DVD Collectors Online

DVD Reviews => The "Marathon" reviews => Topic started by: RossRoy on February 17, 2008, 11:40:41 PM

Title: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 17, 2008, 11:40:41 PM
So I thought I'd join the fray, and have my own threads for reviews of what I watch.

I'll ask you all to please excuse my writing, I'm not really good at it, but I hope to improve with time.

Feel free to comment on anything.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 17, 2008, 11:41:02 PM
Oh My Goddess!: Volume 1
 
Original Title: Aa! Megamisama!
Year: 1993
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroaki Goda
Rating: NR
Length: 86 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo, English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Music Only: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English


Backstory
Well, since this is basically the first review of Anime I'm doing, I thought I should talk about where I'm coming from, and my experience with Anime, to be able to put this review in context.

So, if we don't count americanized versions of anime shows I saw when I was younger (Thundercats, Voltron, Goldorak), my first introduction to Anime was in 2002, when I bought Steel Angel Kurumi (http://www.dvdalistic.com/phpdvdprofiler/index.php?mediaid=702727012228&action=show) completely blind. I discovered it by reading a quote from the show in somebody's forum signature. So I did a little research, found what it was, thought it was interesting, and bought. I was hooked, right then and there. Since then, I've basically bought everything I've seen so far as blind buys, but I have yet to be truly disappointed in anything. So far, I've watched stuff like Noir (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0294154/), Miami Guns (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0468607/), Neon Genesis Evangelion (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112159/), Witch Hunter Robin (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0402716/), Escaflowne (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0261469/), etc. And I've found something to like in every one of them.

I still shop for Anime the same way as before though. Basically, RightStuf.com (http://www.rightstuf.com)'s big clearout sales, reviews of Anime I stumble accross, or browsing other people's collection (such as Tom (http://www.invelos.com/dvdcollection.aspx/TomGaines)'s or Erik (http://www.invelos.com/dvdcollection.aspx/Erik)'s over at Invelos). I usally try to read a little more about what I'm about to buy, but it's usually limited to AnimeOnDVD.com (http://AnimeOnDVD.com) reviews, the Anime-Planet.com (http://Anime-Planet.com) recommendation Db and IMDb (http://IMDb.com)'s user comments. If the overall is positive, or if something I've seen is recommended in the recommendation Db, it will usually get my interest, and I might buy it.

My thoughts (on all 3 episodes collectively)
So, after saying that, what did I think of Oh My Goddess? I like it a lot. Granted, the basic plot is rather simple: clichéd inept young man falls in love with an overly shy girl, and it grows from there. The humour in the show is great, with the awkward "kiss or kiss not" moments, the sisters coming into play, some pushing for it to work, others to make it fail. The "goddess" angle ultimately adds little to the story so far, except the occasional use of powers, but it could be building to something interesting, we'll see, but they only have 2 episodes left to go.

Overall, this is a well executed simple little story, with enough twists with the introduction of new characters. It shows promise, but I'm guessing it'll truly shine in the TV series form, rather than this short OVA.

Rating:  ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on February 17, 2008, 11:51:19 PM
I think this thread is gonna be interesting what with all the anime who have bought recently   ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 18, 2008, 11:17:44 PM
I think this thread is gonna be interesting what with all the anime who have bought recently   ;D

Only time will tell. I have so much stuff that I've yet to watch, it's actually scary and quite daunting! I'm actually hoping this thread will make me watch stuff more regularly. What I'm hoping to do is get into a sort of rotation between movies, anime and TV series. We'll see how it goes.

Oh and I've finally updated the above post with my review of Volume 1, if anyone is interested and not too bored by what I have to say  ;)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on February 19, 2008, 12:07:51 AM
It shows promise, but I'm guessing it'll truly shine in the TV series form, rather than this short OVA.
In my opinion, you are guessing correctly :)
I really loved the way they handled the story in the TV series. They did the manga justice.

As you have described your experience with anime, I will loose a few words of my experience with. Not counting my childhood anime experiences (Saber Rider, Ulysseus 31,...), I have avoided anime for a long time. I didn't want to get sucked into that hype  :laugh:
Until the end of 2006: A few collegues and I have gone to the theater to watch a special showing of Neon Genesis Evangelion. This opened up my interest for anime. Since then I have watched stuff like Full Metal Panic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_Metal_Panic), Noir (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0294154/), Gunslinger Girl (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0476042/), Midori no hibi (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midori_Days), Ah My Goddess (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0872301/), Ai Yori Aoshi (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0339953/), Elfen Lied (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0480489/), Azumanga Daioh (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0381895/).
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on February 19, 2008, 12:09:52 AM
My niece and nephews (ages 7, 5, 3, and 2) like me check this site with them. They always yell "Hello Kathy" that comes on once I log in. Once they saw Sebastien's DVD covers the first thing they want to look at is "RossRoy pictures". They simply love the colorful covers of the Anime DVDs.

Are there any appropriate for children this age? I'd like to get them some plus it might be a great way for them to learn another language!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on February 19, 2008, 12:24:25 AM
Are there any appropriate for children this age?

I cannot speak of most of RossRoys anime DVDs, but if they are similar to those that I watch, then I do not think that they are appropriate for children of that age. I would say they should be at least 12, or for some of them at least 16.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on February 19, 2008, 01:23:18 AM
Years ago I used to read Manga magazine and I won one of their competitions. The prize was a couple of Anime videos, both aimed at a younger audience. One was silly and I got rid of it. I thought both would be rubbish, but I really enjoyed the second:

Moldiver (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldiver)

It's a funny, light superhero story, and although aimed at kids (BBFC rate it as PG), more than a bit cheeky as I remember!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 19, 2008, 02:06:41 AM
As an introduction to Anime, I guess I'd have to recommend the Miyasaki movies. They're not as big an investment as some series might end up being, and most are more that suitable for kids.

That's tough one. I'm not really all that knowledgeable with Anime to be honest, but most of the stuff I have here is definitely NOT for children (Gantz, Noir).

Here's two that AnimeOnDVD.com recommends for kids (although one of them I'm guessing they already know):

Panda Go Panda (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panda_go_panda)
Pokemon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pokemon)

As an introduction to Anime, I guess I'd have to recommend the Miyasaki movies. They're not as big an investment as some series might end up being, and most are more that suitable for kids.

Howl's Moving Castle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howl%27s_Moving_Castle) (PG)
Spirited Away (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirited_Away) (PG)
Princess Monoke (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119698/) (PG-13)
Porco Rosso (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porco_Rosso) (PG)
Kiki's Delivery Service (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiki%27s_Delivery_Service) (G)
My Neighbor Totoro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Neighbor_Totoro) (G)
Castle in the Sky (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_in_the_Sky) (US: Unrated / Can: PG)
Nausicaä  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nausica%C3%A4_of_the_Valley_of_the_Wind)(PG)
The Castle of Cagliostro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Castle_of_Cagliostro) (PG-13)

Or, not by Miyasaki but I loved it nonetheless: Steamboy  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steamboy)(PG)

EDIT:

I said the Miyasaki movies, but now that I think of it, I meant the Studio Ghibli (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_Ghibli#Films) movies: including The Cat Returns, of course, as well as Whisper of the Heart (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113824/)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on February 19, 2008, 02:16:24 AM
I can also recommend The Cat Returns (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0347618/) (G)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 19, 2008, 02:19:00 AM
Moldiver (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldiver)

One word on the Wiki page was enough to make that interesting: Mecha!

I'm a sucker for mecha-type anime: Evangelion, Escaflowne, Appleseed, etc.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 19, 2008, 04:40:38 AM
Oh My Goddess!: Volume 2
 
Original Title: Aa! Megamisama!
Year: 1993
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroaki Goda
Rating: NR
Length: 67 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo, Music Only: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
4. EVERGREEN HOLY NIGHT
Keiichi's life finally seems to be getting back to normal (or at least as normal as life gets when you live in a temple with 3 goddesses!). Yes, he does get strange dreams, and yes, Urd and Skuld are a pain, but what the heck - his girlfriend is truly divine! Alas, System Bugs are escaping from the Heavens, upsetting the balance of the Earthly Plane. Skuld gets on the case, and soon discovers that whenever Belldandy and Keiichi get close, a Bug Exhaust Port is formed. Until the problem is solved, Belldandy and Keiichi can't be together. Then Belldandy gets a Notice of Recall from the Lord. She has to go back to the Heavens, or else!

5. FOR THE LOVE OF GODDESS
You'd think with a goddess as a girlfriend, Keiichi's life would be Heaven, but the fact is, it's coming to resemble the OTHER after-life address. If he even gets close to Belldandy, Bugs escape onto the Earthly Plane and foul up the works. Worse, the Lord has slapped her with a Recall Notice. In two days, she has to relocate home to Heaven. As the clock ticks down, Belldandy must begin to erase herself from Keiichi's life and memory. And Keiichi? He's working his fingers to the bone so he can buy a ring for Belldandy. A ring that will fulfill a promise... a promise he doesn't remember making!


My thoughts
These 2 last episodes of the OVA bring a nice ending to the story. There's even a nice twist of sort thrown in for good measure. But I can't help feel that something's missing. It's probably simply the fact that it is too short. They don't have time to really flesh out the relationships and establish some kind of rapport between the viewer and the characters. They spent all three episodes of volume 1 presenting the characters, and now, in volume 2, it seems like they are rushing through the grunt of the story. I'm under the impression that even just 1 more episode would've helped.

That being said, I still liked every minute of it. It is still a nice, lighthearted romantic comedy, that is short enough for a single evening viewing. Can't wait for the movie and series, that I should view soon!

Rating: ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on February 19, 2008, 07:00:23 PM
I'm a sucker for mecha-type anime: Evangelion, Escaflowne, Appleseed, etc.
Did you see Full Metal Panic? Great series with a nice mixture of comedy, mecha action and romance. Even though it contains mecha action, I also highly recommend it to people who do not like mecha action.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 19, 2008, 07:14:54 PM
Did you see Full Metal Panic?

I heard of it. Haven't had the chance to check it out though. But thanks for the heads up!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on February 19, 2008, 07:20:57 PM
Did you see Full Metal Panic?

I heard of it. Haven't had the chance to check it out though. But thanks for the heads up!

But I highly suggest to not seek out the trailer: It is the worst trailer I have ever seen. It does not even remotely convey how great the series is. If I had seen the trailer before I had a chance to see this series, I would have never watched it!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 19, 2008, 10:34:38 PM
But I highly suggest to not seek out the trailer: It is the worst trailer I have ever seen. It does not even remotely convey how great the series is. If I had seen the trailer before I had a chance to see this series, I would have never watched it!

 :laugh: No problem there, I very rarely watch trailers.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on February 20, 2008, 02:54:31 AM
Did you see Full Metal Panic? Great series with a nice mixture of comedy, mecha action and romance. Even though it contains mecha action, I also highly recommend it to people who do not like mecha action.
What is mecha action? :-[ (Stuff like at the end of Akira...?)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 20, 2008, 03:00:08 AM
What is mecha action? :-[ (Stuff like at the end of Akira...?)

Don't know if I have the correct and official definition, but to me, it is giant robot action!  ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on February 20, 2008, 03:07:05 AM
Don't know if I have the correct and official definition, but to me, it is giant robot action!  ;D
So, kinda like this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUxDmKFCD2o
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 20, 2008, 03:19:56 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUxDmKFCD2o

Yep! Love that movie BTW
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 23, 2008, 06:45:10 AM
Charmed: Season 5: Disc 1
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 989 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:


My Thoughts

Episode 1-2: A Witch's Tail
It felt kind of weak as a season opener. Not a bad episode per se, but it failed to really keep my interest. The whole mermaid thing was out of place in my opinion, and I hate it when they try to create tension with something that just won't happen (Phoebe running away). 

Rating: :hmmmm:

Episode 3: Happily Ever After
Now this one I liked. I love how they integrated the different fairy tales right into the episode, and how it worked great in the dynamics of the show. They even brought Grams back in this one. 

Rating: ;D

Episode 4: Siren Song
Another good episode in which every one "evolves". Piper/Leo find a new understanding of each other, Paige reconnects with a part of herself she had been neglecting, and Phoebe/Cole learn something new about themselves. Also, the demon-of-the-week was just :drooling: (Melinda Clarke as the Siren). I loved this episode. 

Rating: ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 24, 2008, 05:43:04 AM
Charmed: Season 5: Disc 2
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 989 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:


My Thoughts

Episode 5: Witches in Tights
I loved this episode! Superhero-Witches in tights. The uniforms were great, and it was a great lighthearted episode. Good times!

Rating: ;D

Episode 6: The Eyes Have It
I thought this rather a rather standard fare. Of course, the always gorgeous Emanuelle Vaugier lifted the whole thing up a little. Nothing all that special there.

Rating: :hmmmm:

Episode 7: Sympathy for the Demon
Ah another Barbas episode. The Demon of fear showing up is usually sign of a good episode, and again, it doesn't disappoint. It's again a good way to further the overall story, and again strengthens the bod between the sisters.

Rating: ;D

Episode 8: A Witch in Time 
Whooo! Time travel episode! I loved it! The basic story itself is great. It was also nice to see that the Charmed Ones are not necessarily invincible, yet can overcome all evil. A great one!

Rating: :thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 01, 2008, 02:05:52 AM
Did you see Full Metal Panic?

Well, it's on order now  ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 05, 2008, 03:58:56 AM
Forgot to post for a while.. here's hoping I remember what I actually thought of the episodes...

Charmed: Season 5:Disc 3
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 989 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:


9. Sam I Am
Paige gets to know the whitelighter in her, when she meets her first charge, a man named Sam. Meanwhile, Cole rashly tries to get himself vanquished by the Charmed Ones. Piper and Leo have problems in finding a magical creature that does the babysitting part. Things go bad to worse when they're poisoned by a darklighter, leaving Sam as the only one who can save them.

I liked this episode, there was a lot going on, and they kept it interesting all the way through. Of course, it again shows one of my major gripe about the show: Cole. It looks like they still have no idea what to do with him. We'll see where it ultimately leads. A solid episode nonetheless.

 ;D

10. Y Tu Mummy Tambien
Phoebe falls prey to Jeric, a demon in search of the perfect body to hold the spirit of Isis, his dead lover. To trap the spirit, Jeric mummifies Phoebe's body. Meanwhile, Cole tries to save Phoebe by making a deal with the demon.

Meh. Nothing special here. Standard freak-of-the-week fare, although it is probably meant to further Cole/Phoebe as characters, but I'm at a point where I don't care much about Cole so...

 :hmmmm:

11. The Importance Of Being Phoebe
After kidnapping Phoebe, Cole's scheming spells creative mayhem for the remaining Charmed Ones as he tries to gain access to the powerful spiritual Nexus in the manor.

Well, that ones a shocker. I actually liked it. And it's a nice reversal for Cole. He's basically bad to the core again in this episode, and that's actually how I like it. The ending was a bit of a cop out, but they had to get out of it somehow, but it still works.

;D

12. Centennial Charmed
Cole's twisted attempts to win Phoebe back destroys The Power of Three. The Charmed Ones must overcome the destruction he has caused and pull together to vanquish the desperate Cole.

Alternate reality episode! I usually love this kind of thing, and yes, I loved every minute of it, even though it involves Cole quite a bit. This is my favorite episode of season 5 so far.

:clap:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 05, 2008, 04:08:52 AM
Charmed: Season 5: Disc 4
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 989 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:


13. House Call
The charmed Ones become helplessly self-destructive when the Council of Witchdoctors brings voodoo dolls along on a house call.

Basically a freak of the week episode. It's a fun episode, but nothing special.

:hmmmm:

14. Sand Francisco Dreamin'
Terrifying nightmares come alive when a demon attacks The Charmed Ones with dream dust. The sisters must magically re-enter their nightmares to unmask the symbolic meaning of their dreams.

This is a great episode. The basic premise is great in itself, but it also serves to further develop the characters by having them conquer their dreams. And it's a fun episode too.

;D

15. The Day The Magic Died
At a summit meeting with the leaders of evil, Phoebe and Paige discover that all magic - both good and bad - has disappeared. Piper needs her sisters' help after she loses her soon-to-be-born baby to the leaders.

A good, solid episode. A lot happens in it, not the least of which is the premature birth of Piper's child.

;D

16. Baby's First Demon
Demon kidnappers target Piper's baby for the demonic black market, but when their first attempt fails, the demons use Paige as a pawn to launch an attack on Leo and the baby.

Another good episode. Piper gets to kick some ass again, finally. An odd promise is also made about the baby, which I can't wait to see how it will turn out!

;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 06, 2008, 04:44:52 AM
Charmed: Season 5: Disc 5
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 989 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:


17. Lucky Charmed
The Charmed Ones join forces with a Leprechaun when they go after a demon who is killing Leprechauns to steal their magic. To reward them for their efforts, the Leprechaun grants each sister good luck.

This has all the makings of a filler, freak-of-the-week episode, yet, I liked it. It was a lighthearted and fun episode.

 ;D

18. Cat House
When Piper and Leo see a marriage counselor to work out their marital problems, Piper casts a spell that lets them literally see the key moments of their past. However, the spell goes awry and Phoebe and Paige are sent back in time to relive Piper's memories.

This is a nice episode. Somewhat time travel, so it's already gaining points right there, and adding Paige and Phoebe into older footage of the show was a nice touch. Also allows to see how much the girls have grown, and allows Paige to see what she "missed".

:thumbup:

19. Nymphs Just Wanna Have Fun
When a demon kills the Satyr of the Spring of Life, the Satyr's underlings, a trio of Wood Nymphs, escape to San Francisco to find a new leader. After the Nymphs magically transform Paige into one of them, they are all captured by the demon, Tull, who forces them to lead him to the Spring.

Didn't care much for this one. It was probably a filler episode, but it filled me with is boredom. Not even the beauty of the girls could save it.

 :yawn:

20. Sense and Sense Ability
While at the fair the Crone turns a monkey totem of Hear No Evil, See No Evil, and Speak No Evil into a real monkey. This monkey takes Paige's voice, Phoebe's hearing, and Piper's eyesight.

This is a great episode. It has a lot going for it: humour (the girls losing a sense), drama (the baddy is after the baby), the overall story arc advances (baby finds new power). A solid episode, and you can feel it is building up to the finale.

:thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 10, 2008, 05:54:45 AM
Charmed: Season 5: Disc 6
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 989 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:


21. Necromancing The Stone
Halliwell matriarchs who have been summoned to bless Piper's baby falls prey to the Necromancer demon who has retuirned from the spirit realm to absorb their magical powers.

A good fun episode with Grams having to fight off a previous lover and come to terms with her hatred of men.

Thing is, so close to the season finale, do we really need a filler episode? I have to say, I almost always favor series where each episode furthers the story, over freak-of-the-week type episodes. I can understand the need for a filler episode here and there for time constraint or budget, but at least, throw in some sort of bone in there, especially when the next episode is your season finale!

That being said, I still enjoyed the episode for what it was: fun and entertaining, it just didn't further the story.

 ;D

22. Oh My Goddess! (2-part Season Finale)
At the risk of being seduced by their vast new powers, The Charmed Ones are transformed into gorgous greek goddesses possessing the ultimate power to defeat a band of angry greek mythic gods, the Titans.

Well, that was a bit of a let down. All this build up to a fight between the "Goddess" and the "Titans" for that? Sure there's a lot going on around that whole thing. I can't really say much without spoiling it, but let's just say that yes, the story takes a big leap forward, yet the episode itself still feels like a missed opportunity. But with the twist at the end, it piqued my interest and I can't wait to see what they do with it in Season 6.

 ;D


Charmed: Season 5 - Overall Thoughts

This might be spoiler-ish.... You've been warned! (about Cole)

Well, another season concludes. A lot happened in this one, and I'm left with a good feeling overall. There were a few standout episodes (the 100th episode in particular), but I can't help but feel like they are searching for a thread to bring them somewhere. It's like they don't really know what they want to do.

A good example of that is the Cole character. They made him invincible, trying to build the whole situation to something, and it feels like they ran out of ideas and had to find a way to get rid of him. So, they make him create an alternate reality, and vanquish him there, where he somehow lost his invulnerability. Seems like a bit forced to get rid of a character.

At least, in the later episodes, it looks like they might've found something and will be building on it, we'll see when I get to season 6, eventually.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 10, 2008, 06:05:01 PM
22. Oh My Goddess! (2-part Season Finale)
I like the wink to the anime "Oh My Goddess!" with this title :)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 10, 2008, 07:22:56 PM
22. Oh My Goddess! (2-part Season Finale)
I like the wink to the anime "Oh My Goddess!" with this title :)

I thought it was a nice coincidence that I ended up watching this right after Oh My Goddess  ;)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 11, 2008, 05:31:02 AM
Speaking of "Oh My Goddess", I have a little question for you Tom. I've been looking around, but can't really find the answer. When should I watch Adventures of Mini-Goddess, in relation to the Ah My Goddess movie and TV series? By my purchase order, it'd be Min-Goddess first, but story wise?

And anyway, I'll most probably be watching Ikki Tousen (http://www.anime-planet.com/anirec/ikkitousen) next.. Wanted to start tonight, but it's getting late, so it'll have to wait.


EDIT:

Nevermind, guess I already found the answer..

Oh! My Goddess (OVA): 1993
Adventures of Mini-Goddess: 1998-1999
Ah! My Goddess: Movie: 2000
Ah! My Goddess (TV): 2005
Ah! My Goddess Flight of Fancy (TV2): 2006
Ah! My Goddess: Fighting Wings (Special): 2007

Still doesn't tell me where the movie fits in all this though... Actually, I just found that too. It was made in 2000.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 11, 2008, 10:15:49 PM
You can watch the Mini-Goddess anytime (preferably when you know the basics about the characters, watching the OVA beforehand is sufficient). The Mini-Goddess has not real story but is a collection of fun mini episodes playing with our characters (and Gan-chan) with the main focus on Urd and Skuld.

The movie is somewhat a sequel to the OVA.
The others are of course a complete continuous re-telling of the story largely based on the manga.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 13, 2008, 06:50:38 PM
Well, I know I mentioned earlier that I'd be watching Ikki Tousen next, but life, and especially work, got in the way, and I never started. Now I'm sitting here about to eat lunch on a day off from work, and I have to decide what to watch. Now, I have a sort-of "tradition", where when I'm eating, I will be watching a TV series, because I like the devote my unfettered attention to a movie and anime, but for a TV series, it's usually not as important. So, being that I had to choose a TV series to watch, well, the choice kind of came by itself. So I'm going to be watching Charmed Season 6 next.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 18, 2008, 02:24:38 AM
Charmed: Season 6: Disc 1
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2003
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 988 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:


1. Valhalley of the Dolls (Parts 1 & 2)
Paige tries to cure Piper's memory loss, but her spell goes amiss and Piper suffers total amnesia. Needing Leo's help, Phoebe and Paige discover that he is being held captive by warrior-maidens on the island of Valhalla.

Great season opener! I often enjoy memory loss episodes, especially when there's something to hide, in this case Piper's powers, as it usually creates great moment like when she blows up a vase inadvertently, and of course can't understand anything. It is a plot device, but a plot device I usually enjoy. The whole concept of Valhalla is interesting, and I hope they further explore it down the road, but even if they don't, it was still a nice idea. Oh yeah, Phoebe's got a new power, we'll see what they do with it, but they used it well in this episode.

 :thumbup:

2. Forget Me... Not
When Wyatt brings a dragon to life, the cleaners spring into action toi protect magic from being exposed.

Wyatt is turning out to be one very powerful magic user. Actually, they are making him so powerful at such a young age, one has to wonder how they will manage it. But I digress, this was again a solid episode, centered around the mother/child bond. I enjoyed the episode, and come on, there was a dragon involved! How cool is that? Though I have a hard time with the logic behind Wyatt conjuring a very real dragon, from a computer animated TV show. But then, if I was to start being that nitpicky, I wouldn't like much of anything now would I?

 ;D

3. Power of Three Blondes
When The Charmed Ones' identities are magically stolen by 3 evil sisters, they must outsmart the sinister trio to get their lives back.

All I can say about this one is: meh! Even the beauty of the three blondes (well, two of the three) couldn't save this. This is a very substandard episode.

 :yawn:


As a side note: What the heck did Alyssa Milano (Phoebe) do to her hair?? She looks much better with hair on her head!  :thumbdown:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 18, 2008, 02:46:26 AM

Maybe You will motivate me to continue the serie... I am presently stop at the end of season 5 (don't like how it ends)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 18, 2008, 02:57:31 AM
Maybe You will motivate me to continue the serie... I am presently stop at the end of season 5 (don't like how it ends)

I didn't like how Season 5 went too much either, but so far, Season 6 is turning out to be great! (I'm only at the 2nd disc though).
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 18, 2008, 05:53:55 AM
Charmed: Season 6: Disc 2
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2003
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 988 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:


4. Love's A Witch
Paige becomes immersed in an ongoing feud between two magical families.

Interesting episode, as there are a few side stories advancing, and the beginning of a new one for Paige. I don't have much to say, but I really enjoyed this one.

Oh and the hotness level reached a new high: (http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/8688/vmsy400sx600wb6.th.jpg) (http://img509.imageshack.us/my.php?image=vmsy400sx600wb6.jpg)  :drooling: :drooling: :drooling: (that's Michelle Lefèvre (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0498956/), from Montréal, QC!)

 :thumbup:

5. My Three Witches
The Charmed Ones learn a valuable lesson in magical priorities when a Whitelighter and a demon cast them into an alternate reality.

Another good episode, alternate reality and all. It's been established basically since he got involved that Chris (their new Whitelighter) is fishy, but this episode even furthers it. Can't wait to find out what's really going on!

 ;D

6. Soul Survivor
Paige find out that her new boss sold his soul to the demon Zahn.

Good and entertaining episode. It was nice to see Keith Szarabajka (Holtz on Angel) again. This is the first time I actually got annoyed at Paige though. Her getting obsessed over a lost innocent, I can understand, but there's a point where it goes too far, and to me, this episode crossed the line. I hope that in the context of the show, Paige learned her lesson.

 :hmmmm:

7. Sword and the City
A bevy of magical beings arrive at the manor after The Charmed Ones agree to help the Lady in the Lake protect Excalibur, the legendary Sword in the Stone.

The legend of Arthur, Excalibur and the Knights of the Round Table. It was actually well integrated into the realm of the show. There's also a new reveal about Wyatt. He's going to be one heck of a Witch (in Charmed, "Witch" is used for both male and female, basically it's used to designate a good magic user, as opposed to Warlock. At least, that's how I understand it. Hope I'm not too much in the left field ...)

 ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 22, 2008, 06:23:04 PM
Charmed: Season 6: Disc 3
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2003
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 988 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:


8. Little Monsters
After vanquishing a Manticore demon, Piper, Phoebe and Paige become foster parents to its orphaned half-Manticore infant.

This was a fun episode. It was a touching episode, with the baby's father ready for anything to be with his baby. The basic plotline kept my attention and was interesting, and the way the episode played out allowed for funny and cute scenes (especially between the 2 babies). All in all, it's a strong episode.

 ;D

9. Chris-Crossed
A mysterious woman from the future, Bianca, arrives to take Chris' powers and forcefully bring him back to the future. Leo discovers that Bianca is actually a Phoenix - part of an elite assassin family of witches.

And the mystery unravels! Chris' past (or is it future?) comes back to haunt him, and expose him as a little more involved than he wants the girls to know. I loved this episode. The mystery surrounding Chris is slowly being revealed, and it is shaping up to be a great story line. Great episode.

On a side note, the hotness level was high again here, with guest star Marisol Nichols (Bianca or Nadia Yassir on 24): (http://img382.imageshack.us/img382/8679/fictionprem23ns5.th.jpg) (http://img382.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fictionprem23ns5.jpg)

:thumbup:

10. Witchstock
After trying on a pair of her Grams go-go boots, Paige finds herself transported back in time to an era of free love and free magic; and discovers Grams, a peace-loving hippie, who is on a crusade to rid the world of evil through the magical power of love.

Grams is back! I find love most episodes with Grams, and this one is no exception (especially since it also involves time travel). This episode was clearly intended as comic relief, yet is manages to reveal something new about Grams. I liked how when Paige tries to orb an 8-track tape she says "Uh, big, fat tape thingy."  :hysterical:

 ;D

11. Prince Charmed
After vanquishing a demon from Wyatt's room, Piper has an epiphany and decides to swear off men so that she can devote the rest of her life to raising and protecting Wyatt. Unable to handle Piper's revelation, Paige and Phoebe decide to remind Piper of the importance of love by conjuring up a "Mr. Right" as Piper's birthday present.


Wyatt is the center of attention again. To bind, or not to bind. It was a good episode, again dealing with Wyatt's future and destiny. Chris is again as mysterious as ever. We may know what he's dealt with regarding Wyatt in the future, yet, we don't know if he wants to prevent it from happening, and in what way. The whole "perfect man" thing pushed it a bit, especially since they keep saying that magic for personal gain is bad, yet here, it is used and there's no real sign of backfire. Still, it was a nice episode.

;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 22, 2008, 06:33:17 PM


Mid-season thoughts
Season 5, which you all probably gathered from my comments on the individual episode (and from Jimmy's who said he stopped watching Charmed at Season 5), wasn't exactly a shining example of what Charmed is about. To me, it felt like they had painted themselves in a corner, and didn't know how to get out of there. It felt like they didn't know how to deal with the extreme powers they gave Cole, it's like they ran out of material to keep him interesting and had to find a cop out. When they finally got rid of him (in a very lackluster way), they still hadn't really found what to do with the rest of the show. I didn't read much about the history of Charmed, but it feels like they are dealing with the uncertainty of cancellation at this point. Trying to pack as much as they can to complete before getting cancelled, yet missing so many opportunities to make the show better.

Comes the last few episodes of Season 5, and then it's like they learned they were renewed, and now had to find new ideas. That's when they introduce Chris, make Leo an Elder, and Wyatt is born. And it finally seems like they are building towards something.

At the start of Season 6, it pays off. I can say: the show is Charming (very bad pun, I know) again. They seem to have found a connecting thread, and are following it, building the story, making the characters grow, building the mystery: it like they know what they are doing again.

I must say, this is a great reversal from Season 5. Finishing Season 5 was a struggle. I can say that Season 6 is the exact opposite. I am enjoying the ride very much.

:thumbup:

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 24, 2008, 02:22:37 AM
Charmed: Season 6: Disc 4
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2003
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 988 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:


From now on, I'll put the synopsis in a spoiler tag, for obvious reasons, and not just for this series, but for every future reviews.

12. Used Karma
(click to show/hide)

This was a fun episode, I liked it very much. I tend to like episode where magic backfires, and this doesn't disappoint. There's actually quite a bit going on in this: Phoebe inheriting a WWII spy's karma, the final demon on Chris' list of threats to Wyatt, and the Jason/Phoebe relationship takes a whole new twist. Great effort on this one.

;D

13. The Legend of Sleepy Halliwell
(click to show/hide)

I didn't think all that much of this one. We find out there's actually a school of magic for the gifted, and one of the students is targeting the teachers. It's basically a save the not so innocent of the week, that probably serves simply to introduce a new character, Leo's mentor, the school's director. We'll see where it leads, but as for this episode in particular, nothing special here. There's also a rather big reveal, but it doesn't come into play yet...

:hmmmm:

14. I Dream of Phoebe
(click to show/hide)

I like this one. Nothing really special, but the idea of a cursed genie was interesting.

 ;D

15. The Courtship of Wyatt's Father
(click to show/hide)

Oh! Now the story takes on a whole new meaning! I like these big twist. They didn't flesh out the twisty character enough IMO, but still, it could (and probably will) be VERY interesting to see how it all plays out! I can't wait for what's to come!

:thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 24, 2008, 02:30:25 AM
I need to change my rating scale. I find it hard to actually rate the movies the way I actually felt with what I have so far. So, here's what I'm thinking:

New Rating Scale
:thumbup:Excellent
;DGood
:DOK
:hmmmm:Below Average
:yawn:Boring
:yucky:Bad


Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2008, 05:06:56 AM
Charmed: Season 6: Disc 5
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2003
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 988 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:


16. Hyde School Reunion
(click to show/hide)

Well, let's just say Charmed can be much better than this. I wouldn't say it's a bad episode, but still, the story felt wrong, and at this point in the season, they should be focusing on the season arc rather than the pointless main plot we get in this episode. I'm disappointed in this one.

 :hmmmm:

17. Spin City
(click to show/hide)

I love this one. There's just so much going on emotionally in regards to character development. There's a big reversal in attitude since new information is revealed about Chris. The whole plot, including Chris being turned by the week's demon, is used to good effect to show how Chris really feels towards Leo and how charged their relation is, even though the demon itself is kind of lame.

;D

18. Crimes and Witch-Demeanors
(click to show/hide)

Another good installment, that is actually relevant to the grand scheme. Oh and there's a treat in this one: Barbas is back! So you just know a twist is coming (or more!) and I happen to love it when they twist things up. Billy Drago as Barbas again steals the show. He's worth the price of entry all by himself. All the undertones he can get into a simple phrase. I love it! Great episode!

:thumbup:

19. A Wrong Day's Journey into Right
(click to show/hide)

The episode itself isn't so bad, but I hate it when they do that. I'm going to repeat myself, but anyway: They keep repeating, episode after episode, how magic can't be used for personal gain and that bad things always happen when you do. You'd think after six years (three for Paige) of being witches, they'd understand that. But noooooo, they always have to have at least one episode where one of the witch (this time it's Paige) will be doing magic for her own personal gain, along with the bad consequences. And don't forget, they keep trying to make the girls good, so why would they knowingly risk the consequences?

All this aside, it not a bad episode though. Paige is really really cute in this one, some of the faces and expressions she uses, and there's some decent action.

 :D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 31, 2008, 03:52:10 AM
Charmed: Season 6: Disc 6
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2003
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 988 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:


20. Witch Wars
(click to show/hide)

This was a great episode. The basic premise was really interesting: a demon reality TV show. The way this setting is used to further advance the overall story is really interesting, and there's some decent action. I loved seeing Phoebe go completely ape on the demons! Good stuff!

 :thumbup:

21. It's a Bad, Bad, Bad, Bad World (Parts 1 & 2)
(click to show/hide)

This was an awesome season finale! I loved it! Sure, they're rehashing an old idea (parallel opposite universe), but it is used very effectively in this case. I won't say too much, because I don't want to spoil it, but the opposite world is very interesting, and the aftermath of a certain event makes for some great comedy (even if it is way over the top). Great stuff again!

 :thumbup:

Overall Charmed: Season 6 Thoughts

After the disaster that was Season 5, it is very refreshing to see Charmed back in force for Season 6. It looked like they finally focused on a story, instead of trying so many different things that didn't work. I can't wait to watch Season 7!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 03, 2008, 06:01:01 AM
Ikki Tousen: 1.Legendary Fighter
 
Original Title: Ikki tôsen
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Takashi Watanabe
Rating: NR
Length: 97 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
The Girl with the Booby Bombs!?

Once again blood flows in the streets of Kanto. The eternal fate that has been handed down for over 1800 years is now being fought by ancient warriors who have been reincarnated into the students of the seven top schools. One such student, Hakufu Sonsaku, arrives on the scene and is rumored to be the legendary Shou Haou (The one who is said to be the one to defeat many in battle). But can this blonde air-head with the overly-endowed assets actually be the legendary Shou-Haou?

My Thoughts
Well, I honestly don't know what to think of this one. On one hand it's brilliant, I love the animation, the style, the action is well choreographed and entertaining, but at the same time, something isn't right. I think there's too much mystery. I mean, 4 episodes into a series that has 13, and I still don't really know what the heck is going. There's this whole back history, with historical and powerful fighters, whose powers are handed down through generations and all, but it's not yet really integrated into the actual story. On the bright side, as I said before, the action is great and the fights themselves are really entertaing, and let's be honest, that's what this show is all about. There's also no shortage of fan service (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_service) on this series, right from the opening scene. I don't mind it,and even like it at times, but this is the first time I'm actually starting to think there may be a bit too much of it.

So after 4 episodes, I don't really know where I stand. I'm puzzled as to where they are trying to go with the story, but I'm still enjoying it for the action and "booby bombs" fest that it is!

:)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 05, 2008, 03:26:38 AM
Ikki Tousen: 2.Historic Battles
 
Original Title: Ikki tôsen
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Takashi Watanabe
Rating: NR
Length: 73 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
Ryomou vs. Ryofu

After her defeat by the honorable Taishigi, Hakufu takes it upon herself to fight even harder to reach the top. Even as the tournament's battles rage on, the head of each school plots to defeat the others by manipulating their pawns into battling each other. Will Hakufu become an unwitting tool, or will she be able to control the warrior spirit growing inside her?

My Thoughts
Well, the show is growing on me, I'm starting to really love it. Even the stuff I wasn't sure about from the first volume are becoming clearer and much better. I think a large part of my previous hesitation towards to show had to do with not really being able to differentiate who is who. All the names sound so much alike, and them being asian names made it that much more difficult to me. But I'm finally able to sort out the characters, and I can finally understand what is going on (the narrator explaining part of it at the end of each episode helped a lot!). I'm even enjoying the fan service and how it's integrated in the fights and is fun!

 ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 05, 2008, 11:12:58 PM
Ikki Tousen: 3.Water Wars
 
Original Title: Ikki tôsen
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Takashi Watanabe
Rating: NR
Length: 73 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
Wet T-shirt Battle!

Concerned for her daughter, Hakufu's well being, Goei subtly sets into motion her plans to free her daughter. She cheers on Hakufu's opponent Kakouton as well as arranges for a deep mountain trip to visit Chokou, the caretaker of a hot springs training ground. Even Ryomou and Ryofu learn a little more of themselves at this place. Training there is difficult, but what better way to relax afterwards than to visit the local pool?

My Thoughts
This is definitely getting better as I watch it. I'm actually sad to know there is only 3 episodes left. Can't wait to see what happens next!

 ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 06, 2008, 05:55:02 AM
I've just finished to watch the sixth seasons tonight and you were right, it's a much better one than the precedent (in fact I think that it's the best since the season 3, yeah I know I'm always partial to the Shannen Doherty period).

My favourite episode
Witch Wars (like the evil reality show, if they could be like that I would watch them)
The final (good to see this sub-story end1 and to see Leo finally use his maximum power)
The one when we finally find who is Chris (forget wich one)

My least favourite :
Power of Three Blondes (boring, I hate Jenny Mccarthy : she's untalented, she's not good looking, she's artificial and she had no personality at all)

1.
(click to show/hide)

Now I will wait a little before starting the next seasons and watch some others genre of movie after I've complete my season profile (cast/crew by episode are not done yet). Do you realize that I've not wrote one review (my impression on "The Mist" don't count) in one week  :o
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 06, 2008, 06:57:49 AM
I've just finished to watch the sixth seasons tonight and you were right, it's a much better one than the precedent (in fact I think that it's the best since the season 3, yeah I know I'm always partial to the Shannen Doherty period).

 :phew:

Glad to hear you liked it! You also liked the same episodes as me! That's always nice!


Now I will wait a little before starting the next seasons and watch some others genre of movie after I've complete my season profile (cast/crew by episode are not done yet). Do you realize that I've not wrote one review (my impression on "The Mist" don't count) in one week  :o

Well, if you dove right into Charmed S6, it's no wonder! But I missed your reviews. So come on, get to it!  :P
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 06, 2008, 07:07:40 AM
Ikki Tousen: 4.Fighting Fate
 
Original Title: Ikki tôsen
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Takashi Watanabe
Rating: NR
Length: 74 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
The Demon Awakens!

The mortal battle between Hakufu and Ukitsu has begun. A fight that ended Hakufu's life 800 years ago and one that will determine the future of all the fighters! Will Hakufu break the 800 year cycle, or is death truly their only destiny? How can these stupid girls even think of trying to fight their own fate?

My Thoughts
Well, another show comes to an end. And again, it kept getting better and better, yet, it fell short of greatness. Don't get me wrong, it is a very entertaining show that I enjoyed very much. But, and that's its biggest fault, the pseudo-grand story is actually there as a pretext for the fights, instead of the fights advancing the story. In the end, if you get into it expecting a grand story with complex characters and elaborate betrayals, you'll be disppointed. On the other hand, get into it expecting grand fighting sequence interspersed with strong sexual innuendo (can't deny it's there, especially considering that in a sense, the health of the fighter is basically represented by the clothes: the less clothing, the closer they are to losing the fight), all this in a show that doesn't take itself too seriously, and you'll have a great ride that will keep you entertained through most of it.

I can't really say to watch it without hesitation, but if you like the kind of stuff that's presented here (and I do), you'll enjoy it. If not, you're better off looking elsewhere.

 ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 07, 2008, 05:53:29 AM
Bound
 
Original Title: Bound
Year: 1996
Country: United States
Director: The Wachowski Brothers
Rating: NR
Length: 108 Min.
Video: Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Mono
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
A mobster, his mistress and a tough female ex-con are caught in a dangerous plot with over $2 million of the mob's money at stake in this new, ultra-hip film by the Wachowski Brothers. Starring Academy Award® nominee Jennifer Tilly ('Liar Liar'), Gina Gershon ('Face/Off') and Joe Pantoliano ('The Fugitive').

My Thoughts
I must say, I had apprehensions going into this movie. The whole LGBT (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT) angle was a bit scary for me, not that I have anything against it, I mean, what you do in your own bedroom is your business, but a movie around that? Turns out it is basically a MacGuffin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mcguffin), a way to get the girls together and start the story. After that, it is a mob movie, and a very good one at that.

I didn't know what to expect going into this. I'd barely heard of Gina Gershon (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000153/) (only on Tripping the Rift (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0315081/), and it's only a voice part), and not much more of Jennifer Tilly (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000236/) (basically only the Chuky movies (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0144120/)), I was happy though to know that Joe Pantoliano (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001592/) (Cypher in The Matrix) was in there too. All three actors give great performances. You don't really know what anyone's motive really is. And isn't it the whole point of a mob movie? The mystery surrounding everyone's personality and the tested loyalties, betrayals and manipulations?

The imagery is also great in this movie. It's gritty and ugly when it needs to be, yet maintains a visual beauty throughout, especially in the final showdown. There's even a scene where you can sort of see the precursor to The Matrix's famous bullet-time effect (not that The Matrix was the first incarnation of it, but I'd say it was the first time it was used to such an effect).

One negative point though: the DVD I have is the unrated version (which is good!) but it was not enhanced for widescreen! Big let down on that front. Good thing PowerDVD handles that well with a smart stretch.

:thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 08, 2008, 12:44:46 AM
The 6th Day
 
Original Title: The 6th Day
Year: 2000
Country: United States
Director: Roger Spottiswoode
Rating: PG-13
Length: 123 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Surround, Music Only: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
Superstar Arnold Schwarzenegger is Adam, an ace pilot in the very near future who is having a serious identity crisis. An evil corporation illegally cloned him, and now they're trying to kill him to hide the evidence. Torn from his beloved family and faced with a shocking exact duplicate of himself, Adam races against time to reclaim his life and save the world from the underground cloning movement.

My Thoughts
This is an interesting little piece. On the one hand, you have a rather serious subject matter with the moral, social and ethical implications with human cloning. On the other hand, you have a typical Ahnuld action movie. But unfortunately, the two sides are not treated equally. So, what we end up with is a fairly standard action movie, with some decent stunt and great technology (the choppers are great!), that is, if you like that kind of thing.

I do, to a certain extent, but this time I was disappointed.

The movie could've been so much more! They don't tackle the whole human cloning issue, it's there just to give an excuse for the action. What I mean is, if you're going to open your movie with a partly fictitious history of cloning, with the first successful human cloning going wrong and the subsequent ban on human cloning, why then spend the whole movie just chasing after the clone? They even have cloning protestors! But they are all just plot devices, they're basically useless. There's no real debate between any characters on whether cloning should be ok or not, it just is.

Oh well, I guess the opening scenes made me think this movie would be something it is not, and actually, I should've known better. What else can I really expect from an Ahnuld movie?

:-\
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 08, 2008, 12:49:03 AM
Ok, The 6th Day is weak, but I think you're being unfair on Arnold! :tease: Terminator, Predator, Total Recall, True Lies, and dammit, Kindergarten Cop and bloody Twins as well; they're all great. The man has proved his worth enough to be forgiven a couple of 6th Day's, a Junior and even an End of Days. :thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 08, 2008, 12:50:44 AM
Ok, The 6th Day is weak, but I think you're being unfair on Arnold! :tease: Terminator, Predator, Total Recall, True Lies, and dammit, Kindergarten Cop and bloody Twins as well; they're all great. The man has proved his worth enough to be forgiven a couple of 6th Day's, a Junior and even an End of Days. :thumbup:

Yes, and all the movies you mentioned there, I love! I guess I should've aimed my ire to the director actually. But eh! He's the Governator now, he can take some criticism!  :laugh:

Oh and... I do like Junior!  ;)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 08, 2008, 06:53:39 AM
The Mistress of Spices
 
Original Title: The Mistress of Spices
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director: Paul Mayeda Berges
Rating: PG
Length: 95 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1, Pan & Scan 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles:

What they say
'The Mistress of Spices' is an enchanting and sensual fable about the romantic and personal conflicts that face Tilo (Rai), a beautiful young woman trained in the ancient and magical art of spices. With the guidance of her spices, Tilo can find the perfect remedyfor anyone whi walks through the door of her 'Spice Bazaar'. But when Doug (McDermott), a handsome stranger, crashes his motorcycle outside her store, Tilo tends to his wounds and her life is changed forever. Tilo and Doug are drawn to each other and no matter how hard she tries, she cannot suppress her feelings for him. Soon, her spices loose their affect and Tilo is faced with the painful dilemma of choosing between her talent of healing other and her heart.

My Thoughts
There's only one reason I got interested in this movie: Aishwarya Rai. Don't ask me why, but I can just sit there and stare at her eyes. She's so beautiful. And again, in this movie, she doesn't disappoint in her traditional Indian clothing, sensually manipulating the spices. But unfortunately, to me, the charm ends there. The movie itself is rather bland with so many different micro stories with all the characters, yet so little back story to explain it. I think this movie should've been a short, instead of feature length. It's like diluted coffee. You can taste the coffee, but it's barely there because it's been diluted too much. It's like with the side stories of the other characters here. They could've gotten away with had it been a short story, but they felt very underdeveloped for a feature length movie.

Still, Aishwarya Rai's beauty is well worth the price of this DVD! And I'm ready to watch it again anytime, just to see her again!

:-\
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 10, 2008, 05:47:22 AM
Plan 9 from Outer Space
 
Original Title: Plan 9 from Outer Space
Year: 1959
Country: United States
Director: Edward D. Wood, Jr.
Rating: NR
Length: 78 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Mono
Subtitles:

What they say
Starring Gregory Walcott, Lyle Talbot, Mona McKinnon, Dudley Manlove, Conrad Brooks, Paul Marco, Vampira, Tor Johnson, Norma McCarty Wood, Criswell, John "Bunny" Brekenridge and special ghost star Bela Lugosi. Executive Producer: J. Edward Reynolds. Written, produced and directed by Edward D. Wood, Jr.

This is it! The most popular Atomic Age cult film of the 20th century. Winner of two Golden Turkey Awards for Worst Picture and Worst Director of All Time, the immortal Edward D. Wood, Jr.!

It's all here, the not-so-special efects, aliens in skating skirts zooming around in string-powered flying saucers to implement the ninth plan of Earth's conquest (the first eight failed) with an army of zombies (well, three actually): Vampira, Tor Johnson and Bela Lugosi in his legendary "postmortem" performance (with Ed's chiropractor standing in for Bela after his death).

This truly original movie, Ed Wood's 'Citizen Kane', is a hymn to all those who have ever tried to create something intelligent and meaningful and failed miserably every step of the way.

My Thoughts
Is that for real? I mean, how can a single movie be that bad? I tried. I really tried. But I just can't see what the so-bad-its-good crowd sees in this. I honestly never thought I would find something bad enough for me to almost quit halfway (I didn't, I watched it through and through). And you know what? This is 1h20m or so of my life I'll never get back.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 10, 2008, 06:16:41 AM
I found the documentary (which is actually longer as the film) to be quite interesting.

It is in itself a rather dreadful film...
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 10, 2008, 01:30:11 PM
I found the documentary (which is actually longer as the film) to be quite interesting.

I was planning on watching the documentary when I saw it is on the disc.. but after watching the movie itself? I'm so sure I should devote any more time on the subject. But then, the documentary might shed some light and give me a new perspective? I don't know, maybe I'll watch bits and pieces.

But I guess I should now post this in the "I am so ashamed I won't even sell it" thread ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 10, 2008, 01:52:04 PM
Is that for real? I mean, how can a single movie be that bad? I tried. I really tried. But I just can't see what the so-bad-its-good crowd sees in this. I honestly never thought I would find something bad enough for me to almost quit halfway (I didn't, I watched it through and through). And you know what? This is 1h20m or so of my life I'll never get back.
This movie is not so bad, I like it and not even in the "so-bad-its-good" way. Sure there is no production value and not  so great acting. When you take it for it is you got a nice little earth invasion film (ok the zombie part is stupid). With some money Woods could have done a better film, he has what it takes to be a good director (he was caring about his movie). If you want to see a real bad director (probably one of the worst of all time) try Coleman Francis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleman_Francis), not that I don't like him since I own his complete work.

By the way I already own 2 different version of Plan 9 and I will buy the boxset one day.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 10, 2008, 02:31:50 PM
Is that for real? I mean, how can a single movie be that bad? I tried. I really tried. But I just can't see what the so-bad-its-good crowd sees in this. I honestly never thought I would find something bad enough for me to almost quit halfway (I didn't, I watched it through and through). And you know what? This is 1h20m or so of my life I'll never get back.
This movie is not so bad, I like it and not even in the "so-bad-its-good" way. Sure there is no production value and not  so great acting. When you take it for it is you got a nice little earth invasion film (ok the zombie part is stupid). With some money Woods could have done a better film, he has what it takes to be a good director (he was caring about his movie). If you want to see a real bad director (probably one of the worst of all time) try Coleman Francis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coleman_Francis), not that I don't like him since I own his complete work.
[/quote]

You know, now that I think of it after a good but short night sleep, I may have written my review too quickly after watching the movie. Not that I would be eager to watch it again, and I'm not even going to say it was ok, but, I may have been too harsh. It may be the exact opposite of the usual too high expectations. I heard so many times about how bad it is, that I kept thinking that it can't really be that bad. Turns out it is.

I'll give it one thing though. It asks some very serious questions. The whole let's shoot at them because they are not replying, yet they can't reply as they don't understand each other, is a question that should be asked. I also like the fact that Wood did ask the question "Is humanity mature enough to handle such mass destruction weapons as nuclear or hydrogen bombs?"

I guess the problem is the delivery. The actors in there are, for the most part, so bad, it's not even funny. And let's not even talk about how Woods decided to replace Lugosi with a guy hiding his face behind a cape.

But then, it is Plan 9, it wouldn't be Plan 9 without all this. And it certainly wouldn't still be talked about that much today, if it had been even just a little better. The fact it's at the very bottom of the scale makes it a novelty piece in a sense.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 10, 2008, 02:37:50 PM
I'll give it one thing though. It asks some very serious questions. The whole let's shoot at them because they are not replying, yet they can't reply as they don't understand each other, is a question that should be asked. I also like the fact that Wood did ask the question "Is humanity mature enough to handle such mass destruction weapons as nuclear or hydrogen bombs?"
:hysterical:

I am not laughing at your points, I actually find it interesting you found those in the film. I just doubt Ed was actually going for that; at least not very consciously.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 10, 2008, 02:54:29 PM
I am not laughing at your points, I actually find it interesting you found those in the film. I just doubt Ed was actually going for that; at least not very consciously.

Very possible. But there's a whole scene with the Alien "boss" talking about how humanity is too childish to handle such weapons. How could it be entirely accidental?  ;)

But then, there's no real resolution/answer given to that. The alien vessel just explodes and that's that!  :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 10, 2008, 04:28:05 PM
Very possible. But there's a whole scene with the Alien "boss" talking about how humanity is too childish to handle such weapons. How could it be entirely accidental?  ;)
Well, actually, the more I think about it, the idea of poor Ed having these great ideas and lacks the ability to put them on celluloid properly is intriguing...

There, now you've done it. I almost get the urge to rewatch the film again. :yellowcard:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 10, 2008, 04:50:32 PM
There, now you've done it. I almost get the urge to rewatch the film again. :yellowcard:

 :tomato:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 10, 2008, 06:06:05 PM
:tomato:
Nah, don't worry, I wasn't gonna throw tomatoes... And luckily I already watched something for "9" in this month's marathon, so I can easily overcome the urge. :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 10, 2008, 06:09:52 PM
Nah, don't worry, I wasn't gonna throw tomatoes... And luckily I already watched something for "9" in this month's marathon, so I can easily overcome the urge. :laugh:
But you could always watch it if you need a "19" title (total of letter)  :devil:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 10, 2008, 06:13:28 PM
But you could always watch it if you need a "19" title (total of letter)  :devil:
:hmmmm: (If I am in a masochistic mood, I just may do that... And get the disc's money's worth :))
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 11, 2008, 01:30:54 AM
Maurice Richard
 
Original Title: Maurice Richard
Year: 2005
Country: Canada (Quebec)
Director: Charles Binamé
Rating: PG
Length: 124 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: French: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
Maurice Richard had a dream to play in the National Hockey League. Through hardships and hard work, he became a hero. This film is the exraordinary true story of the man they called The Rocket, who led a team to greatness, inspired a generation, gave passion to his country and brought a national sport to the world.

My Thoughts
Wonderful movie. I just hope nobody expects a fair review of this movie from me. There's just no way I can be objective with this film. First, it's a movie from my home land, Quebec, but even more importantly, it is about Maurice Richard. Maurice Richard is a symbol here in Quebec. A symbol of hope, of the possibility for a "frenchman" to actually be successful in an english environment. He became the catalyst for a change in how the english would treat french people in Quebec. He paved the way for many other french people to take their place, and realize that they too can achieve something and rise to the upper echelon of society. Maurice Richard personifies all that. And to top it all, he is one of the best, if not THE best player in the history of hockey.

So in that context, how can I be objective reviewing this film?

Well, even considering all it represents, I think the movie is very well. Roy Dupuis gives a marvelous performance as the titular character. Actually, all the actors are great in their respective roles. Charles Binamé did a great job showing us the Quebec of the time, and showing the politics of the era, while telling the story of hockey's greatest player, and his fight against the establishment to get the "frenchmen" to be respected.

This is a great movie, and I recommend it without hesitation.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on April 11, 2008, 11:56:31 PM
Sebastien,

Thank you for the recommendation! I love sports and true stories and am always looking out for something new. I will be getting this one as soon as possible.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 13, 2008, 06:44:36 AM
House of Wax
 
Original Title: House of Wax
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director: Jaume Collet-Serra
Rating: R
Length: 113 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Thrills and chills ooze all over you in 'House of Wax', from Dark Castle Entertainment and legendary horror producers Joel Silver and Robert Zemeckis ('Gothika', 'House on Haunted Hill').

When their car breaks down on a road trip, six college friends are sidetracked into an eerie backwoods town. Curiosity gets the better of them when they are intrigured by its macabre House of Wax. They soon find out that the town is not what it seems and they must find their way out before they fall victim to its ghoulishly inventive killers.

My Thoughts
I must say, I have a love/hate relationship with horror movies. On the one hand, I love them. I love how the music works together with the cinematography to create tension and a spooky atmosphere. But then, I'm also squeamish. Not so much about the gore itself, but too much is too much, but also because I'm jumpy. I get so tense expecting to be scared, that when something actually happens, my heart skips a few beats. There's also the whole side of movies lingering with me a few days after watching. Not so much on stuff like Nightmare on Elm Street, Saw, Hostel or House of Wax, but more stuff like The Ring (Ringu), The Grudge, etc. For example, I lost a lot of sleep over The Ring. I'm like that.

So, of course, going into House of Wax, I didn't know what to really expect, except I was happy to know that Paris' character would meet her demise. As is usually the case when I watch a horror movie, I again got very tense expecting the scares at every corner. But surprisingly, I'm either become desensitized, or there weren't any real jump-scare scene, but the gore made up for it. Not that there's all that much of it, but what's there is effective. It is gratuitous gore though, but I found it was good gore. I also liked the whole wax angle to it. Without giving too much away, let's just say I hope real life wax museums aren't built and populated that way ;)

The story? What story? The whole thing is set up as an excuse for melting wax and killing people. There's one thing though, that I can't stand, and sorry, I'll spoilerize it, though I don't think it's all that big of a spoiler.
(click to show/hide)

As a whole though? The movie was entertaining. It kept my interest throughout, though it takes too long to take off. The introduction of the main characters gives so little, that we don't really attach to anyone. They shoud've cut most of it, and made a 90-minute movie, instead of a 120-minute one. It would've been tighter, more focused. I still enjoyed it, even though reading all that might lead some to believe otherwise! ;)

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 13, 2008, 11:24:23 AM
The story? What story? The whole thing is set up as an excuse for melting wax and killing people. There's one thing though, that I can't stand, and sorry, I'll spoilerize it, though I don't think it's all that big of a spoiler.
(click to show/hide)
I agree.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 13, 2008, 06:47:28 PM
The Number 23
 
Original Title: The Number 23
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: Joel Schumacher
Rating: 14
Length: 101 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:

What they say
Jim Carrey and Virginia Madsen star in the year's most "mind-bending" (Pete Hammond, 'Maxim') psychological thriller directed by Joel Schumacher.

The nightmare begins when Walter (Carrey), a mild-mannered dogcatcher, begins reading a tattered, used book called 'The Number 23'. Obsessed by the countless similarities between the degenerate main character and himself, Walter plunges headlong into the same dark, seductive world. When the book's main character commits an unspeakable act, Walter is terrified that he's destined to follow the same twisted path.

My Thoughts
I quite enjoyed that one. I think it is a nice little thriller. And as with many other thrillers, there's the obligatory twist at the ending, which I sort of saw coming, and yet I was still surprised by it. I also felt the urge to watch it again to try and catch the little clues that are scattered throughout the movie. I think it deserves a watch, it may not win any awards, but it's good. I loved Jim Carey in the leading role. I find I like him much more in his dramatic work than his comedy, i.e. Truman Show, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, and now The Number 23. Virginia Madsen is just as beautiful as ever.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 15, 2008, 07:18:12 AM
My Big Fat Greek Wedding
 
Original Title: My Big Fat Greek Wedding
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Director: Joel Zwick
Rating: G
Length: 95 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Greek, Spanish

What they say
Toula is 30. And unmarried. Which means as a nice Greek girl - she's a failure. All her cousins did the right thing - married Greek boys and made Greek babies. So everyone worries: what will become of Toula?

Then one day she sees the ultimate unattainable guy and realizes the only way her life will get better is if she gets away from her big, fat Greek family. Toula escapes from the family restaurant. She exchanges her seating hostess jacket for a college diploma, convinces her aunt to give her a new job, and trades in her coke-bottle glasses for contact lenses, just in time for "him" to walk back into her life.

Ian Miller is tall, handsome, but definitely not Greek. Their courtship is an Olympian culture clash. Can Ian handle Toula, her parents, her aunts, uncles, cousins and several centuries of Greek heritage? Will Toula discover the love she's been missing right in the heart of her big, fat family?

One thing is for sure, for better or worse, richer or poorer, with Ian's proposal, Toula is headed for her big, fat Greek wedding.

My Thoughts
So, what do we have here? Well, at its core, this movie is a fairly standard, run of the mill, love story: Girl meets boy, they fall in love, they marry. Nothing special here. What's interesting, is the clash of cultures. You've got the typical, overprotective, almost paranoid father. The very open-minded, understanding mother. And a big and loud typical greek family. Now, movie may be called "My Big Fat Greek Wedding", but the way I see it, you could exchange Greek for just about anything. The greek angle, is probably just what Nia Vardalos (Writer and leading lady) knew better, but the way the film is constructed, it is a look at how a different culture would react towards the first girl to marry a, in this case non-greek, boy, and all the lack of trust and oddities that ensues. And they are plenty in this movie, which is actually quite funny in its own right. I actually laughed out loud a few times.

You should give this movie a spin, it might surprise you. Even if you don't usually like love stories.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on April 15, 2008, 10:38:29 PM
My Big Fat Greek Wedding
 
Original Title: My Big Fat Greek Wedding
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Director: Joel Zwick
Rating: G
Length: 95 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Greek, Spanish

What they say
Toula is 30. And unmarried. Which means as a nice Greek girl - she's a failure. All her cousins did the right thing - married Greek boys and made Greek babies. So everyone worries: what will become of Toula?

Then one day she sees the ultimate unattainable guy and realizes the only way her life will get better is if she gets away from her big, fat Greek family. Toula escapes from the family restaurant. She exchanges her seating hostess jacket for a college diploma, convinces her aunt to give her a new job, and trades in her coke-bottle glasses for contact lenses, just in time for "him" to walk back into her life.

Ian Miller is tall, handsome, but definitely not Greek. Their courtship is an Olympian culture clash. Can Ian handle Toula, her parents, her aunts, uncles, cousins and several centuries of Greek heritage? Will Toula discover the love she's been missing right in the heart of her big, fat family?

One thing is for sure, for better or worse, richer or poorer, with Ian's proposal, Toula is headed for her big, fat Greek wedding.

My Thoughts
So, what do we have here? Well, at its core, this movie is a fairly standard, run of the mill, love story: Girl meets boy, they fall in love, they marry. Nothing special here. What's interesting, is the clash of cultures. You've got the typical, overprotective, almost paranoid father. The very open-minded, understanding mother. And a big and loud typical greek family. Now, movie may be called "My Big Fat Greek Wedding", but the way I see it, you could exchange Greek for just about anything. The greek angle, is probably just what Nia Vardalos (Writer and leading lady) knew better, but the way the film is constructed, it is a look at how a different culture would react towards the first girl to marry a, in this case non-greek, boy, and all the lack of trust and oddities that ensues. And they are plenty in this movie, which is actually quite funny in its own right. I actually laughed out loud a few times.

You should give this movie a spin, it might surprise you. Even if you don't usually like love stories.



I agree...this movie cracked me up too!  ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 19, 2008, 08:46:56 PM
Sebastien

just to let you know that if you have not watch the season 7 of Charmed yet, it's a great one better than the precedent. I've watched half of it and the storyline is good, no monster of the week and all the episodes are conected. Since you like usually the good looking girls, this is the new Seer  :drooling:

(http://img26.picoodle.com/img/img26/4/4/19/f_Clipboard01m_613c28f.jpg)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on April 19, 2008, 08:56:38 PM
(http://img26.picoodle.com/img/img26/4/4/19/f_Clipboard01m_613c28f.jpg)

Isn't that Charisma Carpenter (Cordelia Chase in Buffy/Angel)?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 19, 2008, 08:59:28 PM
Isn't that Charisma Carpenter (Cordelia Chase in Buffy/Angel)?
Yes, maybe I will have to check those serie too  :hmmmm:
Not that I was interested in them, but if she have an important role  :whistle:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on April 19, 2008, 09:02:29 PM
Isn't that Charisma Carpenter (Cordelia Chase in Buffy/Angel)?
Yes, maybe I will have to check those serie too  :hmmmm:
Not that I was interested in them, but if she have an important role  :whistle:

Cordelia is a "major minor" character in Buffy seasons 1 to 3 and belongs to the main cast of Angel seasons 1 to 4

And if you like Charmed you can hardly go wrong with Buffy.


8 edits for two simple sentences, I should stop writing for today.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 19, 2008, 09:18:08 PM
Cordelia is a "major minor" character in Buffy seasons 1 to 3 and belongs to the main cast of Angel seasons 1 to 4 (...)
Just place an order for the first season of Angel. Don't know if I will like that, but if not it's not the end of the world and if yes I will have discover another good series on dvd.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on April 19, 2008, 09:22:11 PM
Pleas keep in mind that Angel is a spin-off of Buffy and the first season of Angel runs parallel to Buffy's fourth season.

Angel was a major character on Buffy seasons 1 to 3.

While I think Angel is understandable without knowing Buffy you should expect to not understand every subtext.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 19, 2008, 09:27:18 PM
I definitely recommend Buffy first, Jimmy. The Cordelia character is defined there. She's responsible for some of my favourite lines:

"Well, evil just compounds evil, doesn't it? First, I'm sentenced to a computer tutorial on Saturday. Now I have to read some computer book. There are books on computers? Isn't the point of computers to replace books?"

"Can you help me with a ticket? It's totally bogus. It was a one-way street. I was going one way!"



 :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 19, 2008, 09:33:00 PM
And if I've watched the movie will it be ok  :laugh:
I'm not serious with that...

With the order of Angel I've reach my budget for april, but I will check for Buffy too in may.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 19, 2008, 09:38:30 PM
And if I've watched the movie will it be ok  :laugh:
I'm not serious with that...

 :suicide:

 :P
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on April 19, 2008, 09:53:41 PM
Cordelia is a "major minor" character in Buffy seasons 1 to 3 and belongs to the main cast of Angel seasons 1 to 4 (...)
Just place an order for the first season of Angel. Don't know if I will like that, but if not it's not the end of the world and if yes I will have discover another good series on dvd.

another remark: I don't know where you ordered nor do I know shipping costs or exchange rates, but I recently received an ad from Amzon UK regarding Buffy and Angel:

for example: season 1 for 10 pounds: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B0009YVD2Q
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 19, 2008, 09:58:14 PM
That is an excellent price, Karsten. Anyone not on the Buffy band-wagon, this is a great time to board!

Today I bought The Guardian newspaper because they were giving away DVDs of the original Godzilla. In keeping with such notions, one of their supplements contained the following article. I thought I'd post it here because I think it's in keeping with the mood of your thread, Jimmy:

(http://www.jonmeakin.com/misc/guardian (roger corman).jpg)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 19, 2008, 10:05:12 PM
Ordered on Amazon.ca marketplace for 29.95$ (the amazon price is 71.98$). This is not the Slim set who are less costly, but unavalaible on amazon.ca. Because of the border cost, I prefer to order the television set from Canadian sellers (tv dvd are always over our stupid 20$ limit).
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 19, 2008, 10:37:27 PM
Good article Jon. I would never compare MTV Films with American International Picture even if I've appreciated some of their film (Varsity Blues and Æon Flux) because none of their production will be remember in 10 years. If you watch only mainstream film maybe the 3 actors name are known, but I will never say that Beverly Garland, Dick Miller, Barboura Morris or Hazel Court (who had died this week  :() are "never-weres" actors. Most of the time you have a fun time when you watch a movie made by Roger Corman, even his version of the Fantastic Four who was never release (I have it and I find it more enjoyable than the recent FF movies).

P.S : this is not my thread, I've highjacked the review thread of Sebastien  :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 19, 2008, 10:43:10 PM
your thread, Jimmy:

 :redcard:

As Jimmy already pointed out, this is my thread! Not that I mind that it got sidetracked. Just shows how "appreciated" the reviews are  :weep:

 :P
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 19, 2008, 10:46:07 PM
(http://img26.picoodle.com/img/img26/4/4/19/f_Clipboard01m_613c28f.jpg)

 :drooling: :drooling: :drooling:

Must ... resist ... ... Marathon ... not ... over ... yet ...


Oh, and like the others have said, both Buffy and Angel have my vote. You can't go wrong with them (or Firefly, for that matter).
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 19, 2008, 10:47:44 PM
 :-[ :bag:
your thread, Jimmy:

 :redcard:

As Jimmy already pointed out, this is my thread! Not that I mind that it got sidetracked. Just shows how "appreciated" the reviews are  :weep:

 :P

You know, I think I'm lost! I thought I was in Jimmy's "Little Seen Movie Marathon"... Very sorry!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 21, 2008, 03:23:11 AM
Good Morning, Vietnam
 
Original Title: Good Morning, Vietnam
Year: 1988
Country: United States
Director: Barry Levinson
Rating: 14
Length: 121 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English

What they say
When the U.S. Army engages irreverent, nonconformist radio deejay Adrian Cronauer, it unleashed a secret, if unpredictable, weapon: laughter. Academy Award® winner Robin Williams (Best Supporting Actor, 'Good Will Hunting', 1997) shakes up 1965 Saigon in the role that garnered him his very first Oscar® nomination.

Imported by the Military to host an early a.m. radio show, Cronauer (Williams) blasts the formerly serene, sanitized airwaves with a constant barrage of rapid-fire humor and the hottest hits from back home.

The G.I.s love him, the top brass is up in arms. Riddled with sidesplitting comic salvos, bittersweet bombshells and hot '60s rock 'n' roll, this landmark film chronicles one man's raucous Saigon adventures amidst a world gone mad. Featuring all-new bonus material that includes hilarious outtakes from Robin Williams' "raw" monologues, this Special Edition of 'Good Morning Vietnam' scores a direct hit every time you watch!

My Thoughts
Well, it's Robin Williams. What more is there to say? I find it unfortunate that they didn't use more of his improvisations as the deejay, because I really love it when he does improv (anybody saw the Whose Line Is It Anyway? episode with him? Pure improv genius!). And the guy can go on, and on, and on. So I really liked this movie. Definitely warrants a watch if you like Robin Williams.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 21, 2008, 05:25:17 AM
Grave of the Fireflies
 
Original Title: Hotaru no Haka
Year: 1988
Country: Japan
Director: Isao Takahata
Rating: NR
Length: 88 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.66:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
In the aftermath of a World War II bombing, two orphaned children struggle to survive in the Japanese countryside. To Seita and his four-year old sister, the helplessness and indifference of their countrymen is even more painful than the enemy raids. Through desperation, hunger and grief, these children's lives are as heartbreakingly fragile as their spirit and love is inspiring. 'Grave of the Fireflies' is a tale of the true tragedy of war and innocence lost, not only of the abandoned young, but of an entire nation.

My Thoughts
Honestly, words totally fail me. Not that I really know what to say usually, but in this case, even if I was good with words, I wouldn't know what to say. But I'll try anyway.

I've rarely, if ever, been moved that much by a movie. You can't help but feel for these kids. All that they had to go through after losing their mother in the bombing. From their aunt who simply doesn't care, all the way to a farmer who won't spare even a spoonful of rice. You see these kids persevere, trying to make the best of what they have. But when it happens (if you've seen the movie, you know what I'm talking about), it just hits you. And then you start to think, that even though this is a work of fiction, you can't help but think that it may have been like that for some child. And not just in Japan during World War II, but in any war, anywhere on the planet, at any given time. We've all seen wars in movie or on the news, but it always feels so surreal, almost fake. But this movie, manages to bring it closer to home. It actually makes you realise how hard it must be.

Now, some may be thinking "What the heck man? It just a silly animated movie!". Well, I'll reply to that by saying that the fact that it is animated is probably what makes this movie work so well.

They don't take any shortcuts in this. You see the bombers in the air, the bombs raining down, people running for their lives, burnt bodies everywhere, even the common dumps. All this can be done live action, yes, but would it be as effective? With live action, you would know that the people aren't really running for their lives. You would know nobody got killed by the falling bombs, as they would probably be duds anyway. The burnt bodies would be mannequins and makeup. And you'd know that. Deep down inside, it wouldn't be real. The fact that it is all animated here, removes that layer of reality, so you are left with only that idea that it is real. And you get thrown back to what it might be like in real life. You have to imagine it yourself, you have to create the image in your mind, which makes it that much more powerful.

Even the little girl being animated makes it more real. (I'll put that in a spoiler tag. And it is a BIG spoiler, so please, if you plan on watching the movie, DO NOT READ THAT!)
(click to show/hide)

The whole movie is really powerful in what it's trying to convey. I can wholeheartedly recommend the movie. It is a must see. I can't recommend it enough.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 21, 2008, 06:35:49 AM
I haven't seen Grave of the Fireflies, but now I get again/even more the feeling that I should... (A friend of mine owns the DVD, but it may lack English subtitles...) Good review! (especially about animation actually being more efficient for this kind of film than live-action) :thumbup:


BTW, somehow the Overview and your Toughts are headlines "What they say" ;)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 21, 2008, 12:50:48 PM
BTW, somehow the Overview and your Toughts are headlines "What they say" ;)

The joys of cut-n-paste. It's fixed now!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on April 21, 2008, 06:12:49 PM
I think I have to buy this movie at last. I know that it is supposed to be great movie and recommended by all who have seen it. The only reason I haven't so far is, that I fear that it will bring you down watching it. I generally prefer light-hearted movies.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on April 21, 2008, 06:23:39 PM
One question regarding the "Grave of the Fireflies" release you have:
Is the bonus disc worthwile? Or is it enough to buy the single-disc release?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 21, 2008, 06:36:00 PM
One question regarding the "Grave of the Fireflies" release you have:
Is the bonus disc worthwile? Or is it enough to buy the single-disc release?

Well, I'm not much of an extras guy, even though I usually do buy the tricked out releases. The only extra I've watched is the Ebert interview, and not all of it. So honestly, I can't really help you.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 22, 2008, 01:28:54 AM
Grave of the Fireflies


Honestly, words totally fail me. Not that I really know what to say usually, but in this case, even if I was good with words, I wouldn't know what to say. But I'll try anyway.

I've rarely, if ever, been moved that much by a movie. You can't help but feel for these kids. All that they had to go through after losing their mother in the bombing. From their aunt who simply doesn't care, all the way to a farmer who won't spare even a spoonful of rice. You see these kids persevere, trying to make the best of what they have. But when it happens (if you've seen the movie, you know what I'm talking about), it just hits you. And then you start to think, that even though this is a work of fiction, you can't help but think that it may have been like that for some child. And not just in Japan during World War II, but in any war, anywhere on the planet, at any given time. We've all seen wars in movie or on the news, but it always feels so surreal, almost fake. But this movie, manages to bring it closer to home. It actually makes you realise how hard it must be.

I've had this film sat on my shelf for a month or so, and your review compelled me to finally watch it. Oh my. I can only echo those sentiments. It is a beautiful and profound experience, all the more so for never giving a face to the enemy. This is the consequence of war, where all the politics, reasons and blame have no point. In some ways it reminded me of the mood in the early parts of Empire of the Sun, but it continues to follow that rather simple situation, and it is all the more powerful and memorable for it.

I agree with your spoiler section, and I think the animation proved its worth throughout. All war films, possibly all period dramas, are crippled by having to maintain an air of realism, that in the end is self-defeating. Once you accept the animation, all that is left is the story. Beyond that though, the narrative is more interesting than a typical war film anyway.

Tom, I know you worry about it being a downer. There's no escaping the fact that it is a bleak story. It has to be. But because it's about kids trying to be kids, and because it's animation, it sort of creates a bubble within that larger, harder story. You have to see it to understand it, but believe me, the experience as a whole is not a downer.

(click to show/hide)


Also, I think the two disc version is worth getting. The interview with the director is very interesting, and Roger Ebert expresses some of the same points we have here, and also has some interesting comments to make about Anime versus western. There are loads of storyboards too.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on April 22, 2008, 03:09:54 AM
I think that's the first time that I read a review for a movie who is not for a genre that I really care for usually that make me interested in it. Great review Sebastien and because of it and the additional comment by Jon I've put it on my wishlist and will order it next month.

But don't expect that I will start watching cartoon with robot, schoolgirls and others cute animals  :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 22, 2008, 03:57:22 AM
But don't expect that I will start watching cartoon with robot, schoolgirls and others cute animals  :laugh:

Grave of the Fireflies is much more than what most consider common anime. Yes, it is anime in style, but it's serious stuff. Like Roger Ebert is quoted as saying on the box "It belongs on any list of the greatest war films ever made". It's really that powerful.

Don't worry, you will not find any of the "typical" anime quirkyness: no face faults, no weirdos. Just a pure story of love between siblings and the hardship they have to endure.

Damn! I'm almost in tears just writing and thinking about it now!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 23, 2008, 06:14:01 AM
National Treasure
 
Original Title: National Treasure
Year: 2004
Country: United States
Director: Jon Turteltaub
Rating: PG
Length: 131 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: French, Spanish, Trivia

What they say
From Jerry Bruckheimer, producer of 'Pirates of the Caribbean' and Jon Turtletaub, director of 'Phenomenon', comes 'National Treasure'. It's the thrilling, edge-of-your-seat adventure starring Academy Award® winner Nicolas Cage as Benjamin Franklin Gates. Ever since he was a boy, Gates has been obsessed with finding the legendary Knights Templar Treasure, the greatest fortune known to man. As Gates tries to find and decipher ancient riddles that will lead him to it, he's dogged by a ruthless enemy (Sean Bean, 'The Lord of the Rings' trilogy) who wants the riches for himself. Now in a race against time, Gates must steal one of America's most sacred and guarded documents - the Declaration of Independence - or let it, and a key clue to the mystery, fall into dangerous hands. Heart-pounding chases, close calls and the FBI turn Gates' quest into a high-stakes crime caper and the most exciting treasure hunt you've ever experienced.

My Thoughts
After the day I just had, I needed something light and easy that might manage to keep me awake (I had a rough day at work). National Treasure fits the bill. You can't get much easier to follow than this, there's some decent action, although it didn't manage to really keep me awake, I did doze off at some point. But just to show how easy it is to follow, I didn't even have to rewind to actually know what was going on! Basically a nice fun little trip.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 28, 2008, 01:44:34 PM
A Scanner Darkly
 
Original Title: A Scanner Darkly
Year: 2006
Country: United States
Director: Richard Linklater
Rating: R
Length: 100 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
'What does a scanner see? Into the head? Into the heart?' From the novel by Philip K. Dick - the sci-fi legend whose works-to-film include 'Blade Runner', 'Total Recall' and 'Minority Report' - comes 'A Scanner Darkly', brought to the screen by filmmaker Richard Linklater with an edgy graphic-novel look.

The time: just beyond now. The place: suburbia. The story: a twisted, funny tale of people hooked on Substance D. And of a government that cheerfully destroys its citizens - their rights, their relationships - in order to save them. Robert Downey Jr., Woody Harrelson, Winona Ryder and Rory Cochrane play strung-out friends terrified of each other and of spies, Keanu Reeves plays a spy who's also one of the friends...until his two personalities begin to split. Enjoy the paranoia. Nobody's watching you. Really.

My Thoughts
That was ... odd. It may be because I dozed off at the end, in the last 20 minutes or so, but I'm completely lost about this. The whole movie feels like a drug trip ... which is probably exactly what they were trying to achieve though! But the ending.. Well I can't comment on it, as I have no idea what happened! One minute, thing were one way ... I doze off for a minute or two ... and then everything is changed! So I guess I'll have to watch it again, eventually, to actually make some sense of it all.

One thing though the animation style is really odd, but interesting. It's actually quite weird to see it all as animated, yet still be able to recognize each actor. But the result is a mixed bag, but might be completely intentional. Sometimes, it'll look almost real, and sometimes, the animated effect will be too strong and you lose details. There's also something really weird going on with the perspective and relative position of objects during pans and zooms. But still, it was nice! Here's an example of what it looks like:

(http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/6722/keanutk8.th.jpg) (http://img176.imageshack.us/my.php?image=keanutk8.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8400/robertum1.th.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=robertum1.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/5318/rorywp9.th.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=rorywp9.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/6960/woodytj8.th.jpg) (http://img241.imageshack.us/my.php?image=woodytj8.jpg) (http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/1549/wynonamz8.th.jpg) (http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?image=wynonamz8.jpg)

Robert Downey Jr. in this is marvelous. I loved his performance. He is great in the insanity that is Substance D. Rory Cochrane is great too in his portrayal of a close to break down addict.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 29, 2008, 12:26:38 AM
I thought A Scanner Darkly was great. Looking forward to seeing it again because you're right, it can be disorientating. I loved the story overall though and it gave the film real substance.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 19, 2008, 05:33:35 PM
Charmed: Season 7
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2004
Country: United States
Director: 1. A Call to Arms
Rating: NR
Length: 932 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:

What they say
Follow the Charmed Ones, Phoebe (Alyssa Milano), Piper (Holly Marie Combs) and Paige (Rose McGowan), on their suspenseful adventures of the supernatural! In 'Charmed: The Complete Seventh Season', the magical Halliwell sisters are called to travel back in time, protect the innocents from the deadly demon Sarpedon, and keep Zankou from claiming the powerful Book of Shadows. Join the Charmed Ones in the ultimate battle of impending doom when the almighty Avatars from ancient Egypt plot to vanquish anyone who threatens their Utopian transformation of the world! 'Charmed: The Complete Seventh Season' is filled with pure excitement, romance and mystical thrills. The Power of Three has never been better!

My Thoughts
As you may have noticed, I didn't post individual reviews of each episodes. For one thing, they are readily available in plenty of other places, and I found it got really tiresome to keep saying "this was good", "this was bad" trying to not spoil anything for someone who may want to jump in and watch the show himself.

So, what did I think of Season 7? It was awesome! I loved every minute of it. The story flowed well, the adversaries were well thought out and well cast (Oded Fehr as Zankou is awesome!), the Avatars have this serene all powerful look and mannerism.

I absolutely loved all three episodes with Billy Zane in them as an ex-demon turned human. He is wonderful in those.

The finale was awesome, though it felt more like a show finale, than a season finale. I guess they were planning to end ut there, after seven years. Wonder how they'll dig themselves out of this one for Season 8! ;)

One thing though, I'm not sure I like what they did with Leo.. It fits with the story, and makes sense.. But he lost something as a character in the process.

I'm already looking forward to Season 8!

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on May 19, 2008, 06:07:46 PM
From my memory at least... they were not sure if there would be a season 8 or not... they wanted to do one more season... but the studio didn't say yes or no at that point. So they opted to do a story that would work either as a season finale or a series finale... and give some closure either way.

I am glad it worked out the way they did... since they got to do another season as they wanted to... and was able to do a series finale the way they wanted to... one that was much more satisfying as a series finale I must add.  :thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 25, 2008, 07:35:36 PM
Charmed: Season 8
 
Original Title: Charmed
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 918 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital Stereo, Spanish: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Portuguese, Spanish

What they say
Get ready for the ultimate ride in supernatural entertainment! In 'Charmed': The Final Season, the magical Halliwell sisters Phoebe (Alyssa Milano), Piper (Holly Marie Combs) and Paige (Rose McGowan) face their biggest challenges in love, life and death as they try one last time to fulfill their destiny! Join them in their fight to protect Leo from the Angel of Death, and witness their devastating battle when demons conspire to take over the Underworld! 'Charmed': The Final Season's 6 discs deliver 22 episodes of nonstop thrills, suspense and a climactic finale! The 'Charmed' Ones are ready. Are you?

My Thoughts
This is it Ladies and Gentlemen, the final season of Charmed. And boy, what a final season!

They managed to dig themselves out of the situation they created in the season 7 finale in a nice way: introduce a new witch. At first, I wasn't too find of her. I found her annoying. But, as the episodes went by she grew on me, and I started liking her more and more.

The season itself was a bit of a bumpy ride. I didn't find that the story flowed as well as it did in, say, Season 7. That is, until the pieces fall into place and the ultimate season vilain is revealed. Then it picks up and culminates in one of the better series finale I've ever seen.

There are 2 things though that I didn't like about the finale, one of which is common knowledge: Where was Prue? I know, contracts and all and whatever else happened behind the curtains, but still.

Also,
(click to show/hide)

Final season rating:
Series finale rating:

Charmed as a whole is a great series. It'll be weird when I go back to revisit it, and see the girls all wimpy again, barely able to control their powers after seeing them so powerful by the end of the series. There's a ongoing evolution about the girls that make the series so appealing. Every new season, something new happens to make them grow, get stronger. The hardships they faced, the losses, the joys. Charmed is great series, and if you like fantasy stuff, you should really like this. :thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on May 25, 2008, 07:49:45 PM
Glad you enjoyed the series so much!  :thumbup:

You bring up something here I never even though about....
Also,
(click to show/hide)

Since I never thought about it before now... I guess it never really bothered me too much. But I do whole heartedly agree about Prue... I can understand the reasoning surrounding it... but that don't make it seem any more right.
Final season rating:
Series finale rating:

Charmed as a whole is a great series. It'll be weird when I go back to revisit it, and see the girls all wimpy again, barely able to control their powers after seeing them so powerful by the end of the series. There's a ongoing evolution about the girls that make the series so appealing. Every new season, something new happens to make them grow, get stronger. The hardships they faced, the losses, the joys. Charmed is great series, and if you like fantasy stuff, you should really like this. :thumbup:


This is definitely one of my all time favorite series finales. I really prefer it over the season 7 finale... that could have been our series finale.

I always thought I was one of the few that liked this series all the way to the end... so I am glad to see someone else enjoying the entire series.  :yahoo:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2008, 05:42:45 AM
The Thomas Crown Affair
 
Original Title: The Thomas Crown Affair
Year: 1999
Country: United States
Director: John McTiernan
Rating: R
Length: 113 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1, Pan & Scan 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
"Pierce Brosnan and Rene Russo catch fire" ('USA Today') in this sizzling, suspense-filled thriller from the director of 'Die Hard' and 'The Hunt For Red October'.

Thrill-seeking billionaire Thomas Crown (Brosnan) loves nothing more than courting disaster -- and winning! So when his world becomes too stiflingly "safe," he pulls off his boldest stunt ever: stealing a priceless painting -- in broad daylight -- from one of Manhattan's most heavily-guarded museums. But his post-heist excitement soon pales beside an even greater challenge: Catherine Banning (Russo). A beautiful insurance investigator hired to retrieve the artwork, Catherine's every bit as intelligent, cunning 'and' hungry for adventure as he is. And just when Thomas realizes he's finally met his match, she skillfully leads him into a daring game of cat and mouse that's more intoxicating -- and dangerous -- than anything either of them has ever experienced before!

My Thoughts
I really didn't know what to watch tonight. I knew I felt like watching a movie, as opposed to playing games, but I was not in any particular mood. So what I did is I closed my eyes, and "felt" my way through my unwatched pile, and watched the movie on which my hand stopped. And so The Thomas Crown Affair it was.

So, what did I think of it? Well, I don't really know. I guess it wasn't what I was expecting. I don't know where I got that from, but I was expecting some sort of suspenseful thriller. What I got, is a thriller alright, but more a romantic thriller.

I loved the opening scene. Never having seen the original, I really didn't know what was going on. And to open on a heist to steal a painting, really sets the story in motion in a great way. Unfortunately, it kinda drags all the way through to the reveal of the painting's fate. Sure, there's a few highlights. The dance scene is nice, although both of them aren't really dancers. The sex scene is fun too, and I must say, while I never cared much for René Russo, she is strikingly beautiful in this movie. And no, I'm not saying this only because we see her topless a few times :tease:. But all in all, it is quite boring in my opinion. It plays too much like a romance movie sandwhiched between two action scenes.

You know, it could be the ultimate chick flick for boyfriend. Opens with a good action scene, develops the romance, closes on an action scene. With sex and nudity thrown in for good measure. ;)

Thomas Crown is an OK movie, but not something I'll necessarily be eager to watch again.



edit:

I forgot to mention something. The soundtrack is awesome! The choice of the songs is wonderful. It might have something to do with the fact that it is very jazz oriented, and well, I love jazz. I even let the credits roll, twice, just to listen to the song (Windmill of Your Mind by Sting)

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 26, 2008, 12:44:24 PM
It is a strange film, but if you're in the mood for it, it's pretty good. I've never seen the original with Steve McQueen, but apparently that really is a snooze-fest!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2008, 04:01:58 PM
It is a strange film, but if you're in the mood for it, it's pretty good. I've never seen the original with Steve McQueen, but apparently that really is a snooze-fest!

 :phew:

When I saw you had replied, I thought I had incurred your wrath for not liking a masterpiece!  :laugh: :tease:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 26, 2008, 07:01:48 PM
When I saw you had replied, I thought I had incurred your wrath for not liking a masterpiece!  :laugh: :tease:

:hysterical: I don't think anyone is confusing either version with a masterpiece!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 28, 2008, 06:27:08 AM
House of the Dead
 
Original Title: House of the Dead
Year: 2003
Country: Germany
Director: Uwe Boll
Rating: R
Length: 90 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, English: DTS ES (Matrixed), English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
It's Spring Break and the college kids just want to party. When they charter a boat to take them to a rave on a nearby island, they arrive only to find it deserted, except for the bloodthirsty zombies that have taken it over. A frantic search begins for weapons to use against the encroaching killers because, as nighttime falls, their only hope for survival is to win the final battle...in the 'HOUSE OF THE DEAD'.

My Thoughts
Wow, where to begin. There's so many things wrong with this, including something I really hate: the movie doesn't follow its own logic. Yes, the zombies here are a departure from what we're used to. They move fast, they can run, they swim, they are strong, can jump big distances, etc. It's made clear, during one of the first attacks, that they can break your neck one handed easily. I can live with that. Yet, during the battle at the lake, a zombie gets both hands on the neck of some girl, and the girl manages to survive!   :-\

There's also the whole "we are wimps, we don't know what to do, let's run", to the "we have gun, we kick ass, we are now fighting masters" all in what, 2 minutes?  ::)

Also, what's up with the game scenes inserted all over the place? Or the very gimmicky bullet time effects all the time? Or the camera around a character that's just been killed with the screen going red, yet not doing it for all the characters?   ???

And these are just a few examples of all the little things that are wrong in this. But you know what? Despite all this, despite the gimmicky nature of it, and all the illogical stuff going on, beyond it all, what did I find?

It is a fun movie!

Yes, I still liked it! After all, it is based on a basically storyless game, where you just shoot hordes of zombies. And at that, the movie did a great job capturing the fun of the game, and translating it to film. I'm glad I didn't listen to all the people saying that it's bad and shouldn't have been made, because I would've missed a fun movie.

Rating:

Oh, I forgot the mention. The actress playing Alicia (Ona Grauer), is HAWT!  :drooling:
(http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/1149/hotdint02vn7.jpg)

And we get to see Erica Durance (Lois Lane on Smallville) topless, though it makes it obvious she got implants in-between :thumbdown:
She looked mighty fine before the implants.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on May 28, 2008, 02:22:45 PM
I'm glad I didn't listen to all the people saying that it's bad and shouldn't have been made, because I would've missed a fun movie.
That's what I've always said if you give him a chance his movies are entertainning and you pass a good time with them. Many people don't understand that it's based on a video game and no story is needed, just a lot of action. The game inserts are an hommage to the game itself, something who doesn't help the film at all...
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 28, 2008, 03:12:26 PM
The game inserts are an hommage to the game itself, something who doesn't help the film at all...

Yes, but unfortunately it comes off as a very clumsy way to pay homage to the game.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 28, 2008, 08:51:00 PM
Many people don't understand that it's based on a video game and no story is needed, just a lot of action.

 :o
Wash your mouth out! :redcard: Some games have better stories than the average movie these days and they deserve to be made properly. I swear, if this guy tries to make Half-Life, I will track him down and make rude gestures at him... :tease:

Actually, that reminds me, on this very subject of plots in games and writing standards, if you come across this months PC-Zone (UK) magazine, turn to the letters page... ;) 8)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 28, 2008, 11:46:34 PM
Some games have better stories than the average movie these days and they deserve to be made properly.

I keep finding myself wondering what would the new Star Wars trilogy could've been like, had it used either the Thrawn Trilogy (Thimothy Zahn books), or KotOR's storyline (the game).

I'd also love to see Mass Effect made into a movie! Blue alien sex and all!  ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 29, 2008, 10:01:02 PM
I was really disappointed, when I found out, that the title of Indy 4 is not "The Fate of Atlantis"  :laugh:
Seriously though, that would have been awesome!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 30, 2008, 04:50:40 AM
I was really disappointed, when I found out, that the title of Indy 4 is not "The Fate of Atlantis"  :laugh:
Seriously though, that would have been awesome!

Oh that brings back memories! It was a great game! They don't make them like that anymore, unfortunately. I loved those point'n'click adventures.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 30, 2008, 04:58:49 AM
Shrek the Third
 
Original Title: Shrek the Third
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: Chris Miller
Rating: G
Length: 93 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Get ready for Thirds -- the greatest fairy tale never told continues with a whole new hilarious comedy of royal proportions. When his frog-in-law suddenly croaks, Shrek embarks on another whirlwind adventure with Donkey and Puss In Boots to find the rightful heir to the throne. Everyone's favourite cast of characters is back, along with a magical misguided Merlin, an awkward Arthur, a powerful posse of princesses, and a bundle of unexpected arrivals. Only Shrek can tell a tale where everyone lives happily ever laughter!

My Thoughts
Here's a movie from which I had seen bits and pieces, here and there, because it's one of the niece's favourite movie. But I never sat down to watch it, straight through, from beginning to end. Until now.

Well, I don't know if it's the novelty of kind of perversing the traditional fairy tales that is wearing off or what, but I found this installment lacking, as opposed to the first two. Shrek 1 and 2 rank among my most favouritest animated movies, but this third one is lacking something. And you know what, I think it's because we've seen it all before. It felt like a retelling of Part 1, but with Arthur switched out for Fiona. I mean, it is again Shrek sets out to find someone, comes back, gets double crossed, fights to regain what he's lost, wins the fight, and lives happily ever after. Rinse, lather, repeat, yawn! Next!

That's not to say it is all bad though. There are a few good flashes here and there. I like the final fight too. But the freshness of it has worn out. Guess it's time Dreamworks moved on to another franchise. They've milked Shrek for all its worth.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 30, 2008, 09:55:48 AM
Guess it's time Dreamworks moved on to another franchise. They've milked Shrek for all its worth.

Don't speak to soon! Aren't they still working on a Puss In Boots spin-off?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 30, 2008, 01:39:35 PM
Don't speak to soon! Aren't they still working on a Puss In Boots spin-off?

Don't know about that. But a Puss In Boots spin-off would still open up new venues that aren't really available in the Shrek-centric universe.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 31, 2008, 01:50:23 PM
The Pink Panther
 
Original Title: The Pink Panther
Year: 2006
Country: United States
Director: Shawn Levy
Rating: PG
Length: 93 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
When a star soccer coach is murdered and his priceless Pink Panther diamond stolen, France is in an uproar. Fortunately, Inspector Jacques Clouseau (Steve Martin, 'Bowfinger', 'Cheaper by the Dozen') is on the case. He doesn't have a clue, but for Clouseau, that's just a minor detail. With his partner, Gilbert Ponton (Jean Reno, 'The Da Vinci Code', 'The Professional'), he careens from one misadventure to the next, leaving mayhem in his wake from the boulevards of Paris to the streets of New York. Will he seduce the pop diva, Xania (Beyoncé Knowles, 'Austin Powers: Goldmember')? Will he push Chief Inspector Dreyfus (Oscar® Winner Kevin Kline, 1988 Best Supporting Actor, 'A Fish Called Wanda') over the edge? Will he catch the killer and recover the diamond? With Inspector Clouseau, anything is possible.

My Thoughts
I was surprised by that. I didn't realise how slapstick it is. Not that I was expecting intelligent humour, but I didn't realise it was this much over the top. And I must say, this was not my cup of tea, so to speak. To me, one of the biggest problem here is that most, if not all, of the comedy is based around Clouseau's clumsiness. Now, I like scenes where a characters clumsiness creates comedy, but for a whole 90 minutes? It gets really irritating. And what makes it worse, if they reuse gags all over the movie. It's like had ideas to do a short, but had to stretch it to feature length by contract, and decided to rotate the few jokes they had, and redo them in different context over and over again.

So while I didn't hate it, it was a very forgettable 90 minutes. It is a disappointment.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 31, 2008, 03:39:33 PM
I was surprised by that. I didn't realise how slapstick it is. Not that I was expecting intelligent humour, but I didn't realise it was this much over the top. And I must say, this was not my cup of tea, so to speak. To me, one of the biggest problem here is that most, if not all, of the comedy is based around Clouseau's clumsiness. Now, I like scenes where a characters clumsiness creates comedy, but for a whole 90 minutes? It gets really irritating. And what makes it worse, if they reuse gags all over the movie. It's like had ideas to do a short, but had to stretch it to feature length by contract, and decided to rotate the few jokes they had, and redo them in different context over and over again.

I haven't seen this, but I know it's supposed to be weak. While your comments support that, I wonder how you'd get on with the original? It is generally highly regarded, but I'd still call it slapstick. Peter Sellers is marvellous, but his Inspector Clouseau is still a clumsy buffoon. 
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 31, 2008, 04:02:13 PM
I haven't seen this, but I know it's supposed to be weak. While your comments support that, I wonder how you'd get on with the original? It is generally highly regarded, but I'd still call it slapstick. Peter Sellers is marvellous, but his Inspector Clouseau is still a clumsy buffoon. 

I don't mind slapstick humour. It's the repetition I found irritating.

For example, everytime he enters room and is about to question someone, or calls someone to his office, he'll through the whole "How fine iz ze wehzer today?" and start looking around the room, and then declare "Ze room iz sekyure". It's funny the first time, second time, not as much, but by the third time he does it, it's just too much!

If you've seen the trailer, you probably saw the scene where Jean Reno's character hits Clouseau in the face, and Clouseau says "Good one!". Well, they keep doing! 3 or 4 times during the course of the movie. I mean come on! Can't you come up with a little variety in the jokes? I realise slapstick is by nature a little limited, but still..
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 31, 2008, 04:43:30 PM
hmmm, it's a very long time since I saw the Seller's version, but I don't remember it being repetitive. Perhaps the true skill in slapstick is keeping it fresh when it is inherently limited as you said, and that's why Peter Seller's was regarded a comedic genius.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 31, 2008, 08:10:18 PM
Silent Hill
 
Original Title: Silent Hill
Year: 2006
Country: Canada
Director: Christophe Gans
Rating: 18
Length: 125 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English

What they say
Unable to accept the diagnosis that her daughter should be permanently institutionalized for psychiatric care, Rose (Radha Mitchell: 'Man on Fire') flees with her child to the deserted town of Silent Hill in search for answers. It's soon clear this place is unlike anywhere she's ever been. It's smothered in fog, inhabited by strange beings and periodically overcome by a living 'Darkness' that literally transforms everything it touches. Rose begins to learn the history of the eerie town and realizes that her daughter is just a pawn in a larger, terrifying game.

My Thoughts
That was weird, but then, the game is weird too, so, nothing surprising. I haven't played any Silent Hill games much, not exactly the type of game I like. But, I did buy Silent Hill 2 on Xbox and played almost all the way through (according to a friend). And I must say, the movie is very faithful to what I remember from Silent Hill 2. The atmosphere, the monsters, the oddness of the city itself, it's all there. The director did a good job capturing the mood of the game.

As for the movie itself being good, I'd say yes. I enjoyed it. There are a few things that feel forced, but isn't it the case with most, if not all horror movies? The monster designs are good, and I like the fact that they went the people-in-suits road, with some CGI enhancement, instead of going all CGI. It gives a little something extra that has yet to be captured with CGI creatures.

All in all, a well executed haunted city story, albeit a bit on the weird side. As far as video games to movie adaptation, I believe it's one of the good ones.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 01, 2008, 04:22:22 AM
Saints-Martyrs-Des-Damnés
 
Original Title: Saints-Martyrs-Des-Damnés
Year: 2005
Country: Canada (Quebec)
Director: Robin Aubert
Rating: 14
Length: 117 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: French: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English

What they say
Dépêché dans un village pour enquêter sur des disparitions mystérieuses, un journaliste découvre un univers qui oscille entre le drame et le fantastique. La disparition de son photographe et la présence d’étranges personnages, dont le spectre d’une jeune mariée, l’entraîneront sur des pistes où la notion d’identité est fortement compromise… y compris la sienne.

Dispatched to a village in order to inquire about mysterious disappearances, a journalist discovers a universe which oscillates between the drama and the fantastic. The disappearance of his photographer and the presence of strange characters, including the ghost of a young bride, will take him on tracks where the concept of identity is strongly compromised… including his own.

My Thoughts
Well. Where to begin. This movie is so convoluted and overly complicated, it's not even funny. And to make matters worse, it is utterly boring. The lead actor is again his wooden self, nothing new here, though I'm guessing it might fit the character, if the character (and story) were actually interesting.

I really hate dissing a Quebec-made production, but I just can't help it. I was bored, bored, bored, bored, bored ..... bored. Don't waste your time, there are much better movies out there on the same theme, and much better introductions to Quebec cinema than this.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on June 01, 2008, 04:30:06 AM
Eric seems to disagree. (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,649.0.html)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 01, 2008, 04:41:00 AM
Eric seems to disagree. (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,649.0.html)

Well, good for him!  :laugh:

Actually, I'm being a bit unfair in the review. I loved the first 30 minutes. It looked like the intrigue would be interesting. But after that, it got so boring I wasn't even paying attention to the movie. So, the story feels convoluted and overly forced. I was actually reading some website because I was too bored...

OR

Eric is much more intelligent than I am and managed to understand it all, where I couldn't.

 :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 04, 2008, 05:29:01 AM
I started watching Lost Season 3... omg! I forgot how much I like this series! I'm at disc 3 three right now (Stranger In A Strange Land) and I can't get enough of Lost! The whole mystery surrounding it, slowly unraveling (I just wish I knew for sure if it really was all planend that way, or if they're improvising.)

I must say, while I so far really enjoy it, and it feels like it is planned, the current episode, Stranger In A Strange Land, is really odd, and almost bad so far. It even makes the whole thing feel improvised. But I have faith, it's been so good so far, it will get better soon!

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 05, 2008, 06:47:56 AM
Halfway through the season now. I just finished watching Disc 3 (Episode: Par Avion)

I'm getting more and more confused each episode. What the heck is going on on that island? It is getting so weird, and I have so many theories in my head to explain some of the stuff, and I must make a very conscious effort to NOT go online and read more about it all! I want to relish in the whole mystery, but I also want to understand it! It is pure torture (in a good way!)

(click to show/hide)

Excuse me while I  :tv:

But my appreciation of Lost S3 so far:  :thumbup:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 08, 2008, 07:14:03 PM
Lost: Season 3
 
Original Title: Lost
Year: 2006
Country: United States
Rating: NR
Length: 990 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish, Commentary

What they say
Find the answers you've been looking for in the explosive third season of the show 'USA Today' calls "the most gorgeous, audacious, expansive series on network TV."

As the power of the island to both heal and destroy comes into sharp focus, the lines between good and evil are blurred and loyalties are challenged when the survivors of the crash become tangled within the lives of the Others.

Plan your escape, and immerse yourself in all 23 episodes of Season Three. Go deeper than ever before in this Seven-Disc DVD box set, complete with hours of never-before-seen bonus features, including secrets from the world of the Others, behind-the-scenes featurettes, unprecedented access to the 'Lost' writers room, and so much more.

My Thoughts
Wow, what a season. So much happened in the course of these 23 episodes. AS you probably all know by now, I love shows that have season long story arcs. Well, with Lost, it's really something because it is a full series arc. Just now, in S3, some of the story that were started as far back as the beginning of S1 are just coming to their conclusion. So I must say, i really loved this season. So much happens, so many new mysteries, older mysteries are solved, we get to know even more of what happened with each of them in their past lives, and how they might be interconnected even before they borded the plane.

Except for 1 or 2 episodes, I loved each and every one of them. There are a few eye-rolling events, of course, but all in all the intrigue is really interesting.

(click to show/hide)

I really love Lost, and if you like mystery shows, and slowly unfolding intrigue, you should love it too!

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 13, 2008, 11:42:12 AM
I've started watching the third season of the new Battlestar Galactica series. I'm not very far into it yet (finished the 4th episode yesterday), but I saw this post (http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15736) in my RSS feed yesterday somewhat comparing BSG to Star Trek. There's no spoiler in there, so feel free to read even if you haven't seen any of the two series. It's quite an interesting read.

http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15736
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on June 13, 2008, 06:00:09 PM
It was indeed an interesting read and I think he is absolutely right.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 17, 2008, 06:52:39 AM
Battlestar Galactica: Season Three
 
Original Title: Battlestar Galactica
Year: 2006
Country: United States
Director: 1. Occupation
Rating: NR
Length: 953 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
The adventure of one of television's finest dramas continues with the complete third season of the Peabody Award-winning 'Battlestar Galactica'. The Colonies’ survivors have found their hopes of eluding their Cylon pursuers dashed by an invasion and occupation of their new home. As the fate of all human life hangs in the balance, friends become enemies, enemies become unexpected allies, and decisions are made that will haunt some people for the rest of their lives. Relive all 20 episodes of the season that challenges everything you thought you knew about the 'Battlestar Galactica' universe. Presented in Dolby 5.1 surround sound, the 6-disc set features over 15 hours of extensive special features, including the DVD exclusive extended version of the episode "Unfinished Business" containing 25 additional minutes of never-before-seen footage. You won't want to miss a minute of the series considered "one of the best dramas on TV" ('Time Magazine').

My Thoughts
Wow! I'm still reeling from the finale. Quite a few big events, turnovers, surprises.. name it! It's all there, in a single episode. I think it might even top Charmed S7 finale, although that's debatable.

Unfortunately, the season as a whole was very bumpy. Don't get me wrong, Battlestar Galactica is still one of the best, if not THE best show on TV right now, but S3 had a low good to bad ratio, compared to seasons 1 and 2. I remember that I couldn't wait to watch the next episode while I was watching S1 and S2, but here, sometimes, I didn't really feel like watching the next episode. There's was too much of nothing going on. The whole season took a spiritual turn that actually turned me off a little. All the quests for the temple, all that speak of God and Gods (depending whether you're Human or Cylon), I thought it was a bit heavy to bear, and didn't bring much to the table.

I feel the show lost a bit of the momentum that was built from the first two seasons. And I think it might be due, in part, to the fact that they seemed to have gone the standalone episode route, instead of the story arc route. Sure, there's continuity, so you can't really watch the episodes in any order you choose, but you don't feel like you missed much (except for some key episodes) if you miss one. It's like there are quite a few episodes you could just skip over, and not miss anything of the overall story. Considering my preference, and how the show was made in the previous 2 seasons, that was a big disappointed for me.

But all is not lost. I still enjoy the show. Very much. And you have to take into account that a bad episode of Galactica, it still a whole lot better than most of the stuff that's on air these days on TV. There were also some really good episode. The obvious high point being the last 3 episodes, that will lead to a wonderful final season, Season 4.

I also want to add that James Callis, the actor playing Dr. Gaius Baltar, is marvelous. Some people have said he is overacting the part, but I think, in the context of what his character is going through and his state of mind, he is spot on.

Also, Lucy Lawless is very yummy here! I never quite liked her before during her Xena days. I always thought there was something odd about her, and seeing her here in Galactica, I think I know what it is. Her skin tone doesn't fit dark hair, and she was made to look tough on Xena. Here, they left her with her natural hair color (well, if IMDb can be trusted, and her photos on Wikipedia show her natural color), which looks much better on her, and also, she doesn't have to look tough for Galactica. So anyway, she was really yummy!  :drooling:  (But Sharon is still top!  :drooling: :drooling: :drooling:)

If you haven't seen the new reimagined version of Galactica, do so. Now! From the start, including the miniseries. You won't regret it!

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 19, 2008, 08:04:35 PM
Oh my. Some people say you have to see the bad stuff, to really appreciate the good stuff, right? Well, I guess I'm about to enjoy good anime even more!

I started watching Cyberteam in Akihabara yesterday:


Granted, I've only seen 2 episodes so far, and they're not even done introducing all the characters. But as it stands now, even after 2 episodes, it seems like a show with almost no directions. It's like they have no identity. They don't know what they want to do with the show. It's such a mish mash of different styles, it's almost mind boggling. You've got mecha type (the Divas wear special armor), but those divas are summoned by a Pata-Pi (a sort of robot toy). The main protagonist is a 12 year old girl just starting middle, that can summon an older version of herself in Diva form, complete with overly exagerated feminine forms (anyone else feels like that there's something entirely too wrong with that?). And to top it all, it is shock full of sexual innuendos. And I've not even started about how overly hyper the whole show is. The characters barely finish their sentence before going to the next! And it's full of MTV style cut here and there.

I'll give it its chance, and keep watching. But it's not looking too good so far. But then, I remember what I first thought of Ikki Tousen (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,741.msg71835.html#msg71835) and how I ended liking it very much. Maybe this will happen here, but I don't see any sign of it. We'll see.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 01, 2008, 05:38:12 AM
Well I'll be damned. Either I'm very easy public, or the show did get better. In any case, I'm enjoying Cyberteam.

It still lacks focus. And they are trying way to hard at creating the mythos surrounding the whole Diva, Anima Mundi and Metatron concepts. And they're taking their sweet time. I'm at episode 17, and Hibari (the main character) has just, for the first time, fully awakened her Diva. 17 episodes into the show! Even the first real interesting fight came in only at episode 10, and at that time, the girls had yet to figure out how to even summon their Divas!

But the show is still interesting in a way. I can see what they are trying to do. But I feel it is mired in too many details, and they spend way too much time with the girls just "living their lives". They could've cut the show quite a big deal and not lost much in terms of story.

I'm hoping, now that Hibari has finally "awakened", that the show will pick up for the last 9 episodes! Should be fun! ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 04, 2008, 06:37:02 AM
Cyberteam in Akihabra: Complete Collection
 
Original Title: Akihabara Dennou Gumi
Year: 1998
Country: Japan
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 623 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio:
Subtitles:

What they say
Like all girls her age, Hibari Hanakoganei covets the latest fashion in mechanical pets - a Pata-Pi to call her own! But when a strange White Prince provides one, she becomes the target of an equally mysterious Black Prince who plots to steal the prized pet. It's Pata-Pi Densuke to the rescue, however, transforming into a powerful Diva who bears a striking resemblance to Hibari herself!

With astonishing battle agility, Densuke proves to be no ordinary child's toy! But Hibari is not the only one with a Pata-Pi of extraordinary powers, and despite an unlikely friendship, she joins forces with others to form the Cyber Team! Together will they solve the riddle of the Black Prince - or will his flock of nefarious cohorts put an end to the dynamic divas of Akihabara?

My Thoughts
Well, what can I say, that I haven't said in the two previous posts?

The show did get better, especially the last 6 episodes. I still think they took way too much time to develop the story. I mean, there's a single episode that explains it all. Everything they've been hinting at for the previous 21 episodes, is fully explained in the course of ~23 minutes in episode 22. Then, episode 23 to 26 conclude the story. Thing is, the creators of the show assume too much. There's so much someone can take of vague references, and thin threads before losing interest in the show. There's a lot a innuendos in the episodes, that you have to sort of create the relationships between everyone as you go, since it is not really explained. Most of the creatures and ennemies the girls had to fight, we actually learn their names only 22 episodes in. In retrospect, you realise you did hear the names of the beasts mentioned, but how is the viewer supposed to know what they are referring to? There's sometimes many different nomenclatures used to refer to the same person. And then you get all messed up with the talks of Primum Mobile, Apostolus, Avatars,  Homunculus, Anima Mundi, Divas.. How am I supposed to guess which refers to which?

All that being said, I do think the pay off is worthwhile. It takes way to long to get there, and they extend it a bit past due, but it's still satisfying. I wouldn't say it is a prime example of Anime, but it does have elements going for it. Just don't use Cyberteam to introduce someone to anime, you might be disappointed and get turned right off after the first 5 episodes. But if you stick in there, there is something to like about this. I'm thinking I may even enjoy it more as a second viewing in the future, since I'll be able to link all those little connecting dots along the way.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 22, 2008, 07:56:34 AM
Robotech Protoculture Collection: Macross Saga: Disc 01
 
Original Title: Robotech Protoculture Collection: Macross Saga: Disc 01
Year: 1982
Country: United States
Director: Carl Macek
Rating: NR
Length: 144 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles:

What they say
The Zentraedi Are Coming!

Strap into your Veritech and get ready for the ride of your life! When a mysterious space battleship crashes onto Macross Island in the South Pacific, the future of mankind is changed forever!

Realizing that there are hostile forces in the universe, the people of Earth race to rebuild the SDF-1 as their first line of defense against a possible alien attack! But even as they struggle to master the science of Robotechnology, the vengeful Zentraedi armada is approaching the earth!

My Thoughts
Well, as odd as it may seem, this is my first contact with Robotech. I'd heard of it of course, but never actually saw an episode, and being such a fan of Mecha anime, I'm actually puzzled as to why I never sought it out before.

Robotech has an odd origin. Basically, Robotech was put together using three completely unrelated japanese anime series, which were edited and spliced together to create Robotech. This in itself is actually, IMO, quite a feat. Especially since, so far, Robotech is turning out to be very good.

I've only watched the first generation so far, Macross Saga, and I loved it. It had a few filler episodes though. For example, right at episode 14 "Gloval's Report, they already have a full episode which is basically a summary of all that happened so far. And then, 3 episodes later, in ep.17 "Phantasm", they have Rick Hunter in a dreamy state, hallucinating about past events. These two episodes were unfortunate, but rest assured, they are in no way an indication of what's actually going on.

The story is actually quite far reaching, with a massive war, treachery, defections, love triangle, etc. In a sense, it's got it all. No wonder this built up such a following, and is probably largely responsible for the rising popularity of anime in America.

If you have the chance, give the show a shot. It's an interesting study in how far Anime has come since then (the animation can be rather crude at times by today's standards), but there is a great story behind it all, that is well told and very enjoyable.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 24, 2008, 04:46:05 PM
The Golden Compass
 
Original Title: The Golden Compass
Year: 2007
Country: United Kingdom
Director: Chris Weitz
Rating: PG
Length: 113 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, English: Dolby Digital Stereo, French: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
In a marvelous parallel world where witches soar the skies and Ice Bears rule teh frozen North, one special girl is destined to hold the fate of the universe in her hands.When Lyra Belacqua (Dakota Blue Richards) becomes the keeper of the Golden Compass, only she has the ability to read its portent messages and prevent her world - and all others - from slipping into an evil darkness.

My Thoughts
That was an underwhelming experience if there ever was one. Underused stars, overused child actor who obviously can't carry a movie alone, overused CGI, bland and routine direction, etc.

My main gripe about the movie though, is the lead child actress. Not that she's a bad actress or anything, but who the hell decided to greenlight a project where a child actor has to carry a whole movie with only 2 CGI animals as support? I've yet to see a single child actor who could pull that off.

And the animals.. Well, they are well animated and very well done. But the thing is, it is at times painfully obvious that there's nothing there. You'll see someone petting the animal, but not even touching it. Or, holding it in their arms, and it just becomes way too obvious.

The stars? Oh sure, you can put Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig, Eva Green, Ian McKellen, Christopher Lee, even Kathy Bates on the promo material and posters! But, each one of them is on screen for about, oh, 5 minutes each? And two of them are only doing voices anyway (Ian and Kathy)!

But it's a shame really. Because the story itself could have been so much more. It really feels like an introduction of this world, with little regards to an actual coherent story, in the hopes it'll prove "good enough" to warrant sequels that will actually tell the story. Thing is, they leave so much open, and so little actually happens here, I'm not even sure people would want to see a sequel.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 26, 2008, 03:24:30 AM
Over the next few days, I'll be having a themed mini-marathon (but the theme is rather large! hehe) and said theme is:

The Oldie-but-Goodie (IMO) mini-marathon!


Thing is, it may not be all "goodie" though, as I will probably slip in some movies I've never seen before hehehe
And also, "oldie" is not necessarily all that old. I'm thinking about pre-1990 or so

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 26, 2008, 03:40:26 AM
Entry #1 from The Oldie-but-Goodie (IMO) mini-marathon!
Short Circuit
 
Original Title: Short Circuit
Year: 1986
Country: United States
Director: John Badham
Rating: PG
Length: 99 Min.
Video: Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:

What they say
Steve Guttenberg and Ally Sheedy co-star in this high-tech comedy adventure about Number Five, a robot who escapes into the real world after he short-circuits in an electrical storm and decides that he's human. Because he's carrying destructive weapons, the Defense Department and his designer (Guttenberg) are desperate to find him. But Number Five is being protected by a young woman (Sheedy) who is teaching him a gentler way of life.

My Thoughts
I remember seeing a Short Circuit movie when I was younger. And after seeing this, I can say that I saw Part 2, but I don't think I had ever seen this one. Well, nevertheless, I loved it just as much as I remember loving Part 2 back then! It's hard to imagine this movie was as some point a dark high tech action movie with Numebr-5 as the villain. It works so well as a comedy. Of course, the idea of a robot become sentient because of being struck by lightning is ludicrous at best, still, they needed some catalyst to instill life into Number-5, so I can get over it. But after that. The evolution of Number-5 as a sentient robot. His discovery of life, death, love, music, conflict, fear is great. I also think this movie is yet another good example that puppetry and animatronics are better than CGI. I love the jerkyness of movement of Number-5, it gives him personality and an actual sense of weight. His physical presence on set also shows in the actor's play.

This is a nice, light comedy. I love it.

rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 26, 2008, 03:46:58 AM
Entry #2 from The Oldie-but-Goodie (IMO) mini-marathon!
Short Circuit 2
 
Original Title: Short Circuit 2
Year: 1988
Country: United States
Director: Kenneth Johnson
Rating: PG
Length: 111 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1, Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital Stereo, Spanish: Dolby Digital Stereo, Portuguese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: Chinese, English, French, Korean, Portuguese, Spanish, Thai

What they say
Number Five, aka Johnny Five, that incredible, lovable robot from the smash hit 'Short Circuit,' is back and taking the big city by storm in this action-packed comedy adventure. Upbeat Johnny's out for some "urban input," but some street hoods, a greedy banker and a gang of crooks see his naiveté as their high-tech ticket to easy street. Will Johnny survive the big bad city and its big, bad city slickers? Keep your wires crossed when you switch on this high voltage film.

My Opinion
I find it hard to explain why, but this movie is one of my favorite. I remember seeing it as a child, and thinking how cool it would be to have a robot like Johnny-5. And now that I'm older, I find it a marvelous story about how an innocent newcomer to a big city can easily be manipulated into doing questionable things. There's also a sequence that brought a tear to my eye back then, and does every single time I watch this movie.
(click to show/hide)
There's a magic to this story that completely engulfs me when I watch this. And you know, I think Johnny-5 might be one of my favorite movie character of all time.

rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 26, 2008, 03:54:22 AM
They just released a sequel to this!

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 26, 2008, 04:03:05 AM
They just released a sequel to this!

(click to show/hide)

 :laugh:
Yeah. I can't wait to see that! One DVD I'll actually be in-line waiting for it! ;)

But actually, it looks like they are working on a sequel/reimagining (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929281/)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on July 26, 2008, 03:59:45 PM
The Short Circuit films were amongst my favourites too. They seemed to on all the time when I was growing up! It's in vogue to say how bad they were now, especially the supposed "racism" of the Indian character. What bollocks. They were great fun and the sight of the injured Johnny 5 leaking oil is still engrained in my memory. I always desperately wanted to see a third now that he was pimped out in gold! You're right that they can't get that sort of empathy from CGI.

In fact, Johnny 5 is responsible for one of my all time favourite lines (2:23 in the video): :laugh:

Holding Out for a Hero (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l30sOEv_JUc)

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 26, 2008, 07:20:19 PM
Yeah. I can't wait to see that! One DVD I'll actually be in-line waiting for it! ;)
I saw it at the cinema yesterday and thought it was really awesome. Sure, it has it's moments of utter cheese and clichés, but that goes with the territory.

Quote
But actually, it looks like they are working on a sequel/reimagining (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0929281/)
I'll file that under sequel/remake no one needs...

You're right that they can't get that sort of empathy from CGI.
After seeing Wall.E I'd say this statement is wrong.

Please forgive, but I never enjoyed the way they treated the Number 5 character in part 2; making him just too human. In fact, I never was able to watch the second one all the way through.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 26, 2008, 07:24:22 PM
You're right that they can't get that sort of empathy from CGI.
After seeing Wall.E I'd say this statement is wrong.

Not the same thing IMO. In Wall.E it's a CGI robot in an animated movie.

In a live action movie, you wouldn't get the same reactions by the human characters from a CGI robot, as opposed to a real physical robot, even if it's basically puppet and not servos.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 26, 2008, 07:38:49 PM
Not the same thing IMO. In Wall.E it's a CGI robot in an animated movie.

In a live action movie, you wouldn't get the same reactions by the human characters from a CGI robot, as opposed to a real physical robot, even if it's basically puppet and not servos.
I agree on this.

(Should have known what you meant in the first place :-[)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on July 27, 2008, 02:09:03 PM
Not the same thing IMO. In Wall.E it's a CGI robot in an animated movie.

In a live action movie, you wouldn't get the same reactions by the human characters from a CGI robot, as opposed to a real physical robot, even if it's basically puppet and not servos.
I agree on this.

(Should have known what you meant in the first place :-[)

That's what I thought he meant when I meant what I said!  :stars: ??? :P
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 27, 2008, 04:29:11 PM
That's what I thought he meant when I meant what I said!  :stars: ??? :P
:hysterical:

I hadn't even noticed that my second reply was to a different person :-[
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on July 27, 2008, 07:38:58 PM
You're right that they can't get that sort of empathy from CGI.
After seeing Wall.E I'd say this statement is wrong.

Not the same thing IMO. In Wall.E it's a CGI robot in an animated movie.

In a live action movie, you wouldn't get the same reactions by the human characters from a CGI robot, as opposed to a real physical robot, even if it's basically puppet and not servos.

It's related to the "uncanny valley": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_Valley
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 06, 2008, 03:51:11 PM
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
 
Original Title: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: Tim Burton
Rating: 18
Length: 116 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Johnny Depp and Tim Burton join forces again in a big-screen adaptation of Stephen Sondheim's award-winning musical thiller.

My Thoughts
Okay... This is an oddball.

On one hand, you've got the brilliance of Tim Burton's visuals, which wonderfully and beautifully presents this dark story. You also have the acting chops of the likes of Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter and Alan Rickman. But then, it's a musical. And at times, I found it painfully obvious that all three lead actors are NOT singers. Don't get me wrong, they still do a good job, but they acting is so far above their singing, that there's a sort of disconnect that happens with me. The emotions and atmosphere being depicted through acting and imagery, do not come across in the singing. Which is unfortunate, because the story of Sweeney Todd, while rather simplistic (betrayed man seeks revenge), still brings in elements to keep it flowing and interesting.

You know, I find myself wondering how it would've turned out, had it been decided to make a straight horror drama out of it, instead of a dark musical.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on August 06, 2008, 04:58:42 PM
Okay... This is an oddball.
Ya don't say.

I am still trying to persuade myself to give the film another chance with a second viewing (watched it last months and don't want to wait too long with it). I usually like Burton's films, but he really throws a curve ball with this one...
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: goodguy on August 06, 2008, 06:07:56 PM
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
...
You know, I find myself wondering how it would've turned out, had it been decided to make a straight horror drama out of it, instead of a dark musical.

 :laugh: The fact that it is based on the Sondheim musical, is the *only* reason I have this on my wish list at all. Straight horror drama? I was bored to death by Sleepy Hollow. But maybe I should follow Jim Emerson's advise and get the DVD of the old Broadway production instead.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 06, 2008, 08:51:38 PM
Broadly speaking, I don't like musicals at all. I find the basic idea of bursting into song to convey feelings just silly and borders on embarrassing when it's a soloist surrounded by people just grinning and waiting patiently for the chorus. So I haven't touched this with a barge pole.

That said, people have told me that Sweeney Todd has been a bit misunderstood because it is a Sondheim musical and the style is a bit different?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 01, 2008, 05:35:14 AM
Oh.... My.... God....

Has it really been almost 2 months since I last watched a movie? What's going on with me? Well, I plan to remedy all that, sort of. I decided to partake in the October Horror Fest that will be going on in the coming days, to support Pete in his courageous attempt at breaking last year's record, which were really impressive.

So, the coming reviews, during the coming month of October, will be my small contribution in supporting Pete during this daunting task.

First up will be Young Frankenstein, tomorrow evening! See ya then!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 01, 2008, 09:38:15 AM
Blimey. Two months?  :suicide:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 02, 2008, 05:00:55 PM
Blimey. Two months?  :suicide:

Yeah, 2 months... Guess Freelancer, Sacrifice, Rock Band 2, NHL 09, Blue Dragon, Lost Odyssey, etc. all got in the way! hehe

Well that, and the fact I've been struggling to complete the Robotech Protoculture Collection set..
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 02, 2008, 05:24:44 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #1 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Young Frankenstein
 
Original Title: Young Frankenstein
Year: 1974
Country: United States
Director: Mel Brooks
Rating: PG
Length: 106 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Mono, French: Dolby Digital Mono, Spanish: Dolby Digital Mono, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
Mel Brooks' monstrously crazy tribute to Mary Shelley's classic pokes hilarious fun at just about every Frankenstein movie ever made. Summoned by a will to his late grandfather's castle in Transylvania, young Dr. Frankenstein (GENE WILDER) soon discovers the scientist's step-by-step manual explaining how to bring a corpse to life.

My Thoughts
What can I say that has not already been said about this movie?

Gene Wilder is magnificent here as Dr. Fronkensteen ;). Actually, the whole cast is great, and they are having fun, and it shows. The jokes are great, the pacing is well done. It totally works as an homage to the old monster movies, mostly Frankenstein of course. So many great moments. This is one of my favorite comedy.

-----------------------
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Well, dear, are you ready?
Inga: Yes, Doctor.
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Elevate me.
Inga: Now? Right here?
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: Yes, yes, raise the platform.
Inga: Oh. Ze platform. Oh, zat, yah, yah... . yes.
-----------------------

-----------------------
[Frankenstein, Igor and Inga in front of HUGE castle doors]
Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: What knockers.
Inga: Oh, thank you doctor.
-----------------------

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on October 02, 2008, 06:29:56 PM
And one of my favorites: "Ah sweet mystery of life at last I found you."

I love this movie so much, and watched it so many times, that I have the whole thing memorized!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 02, 2008, 06:35:03 PM
Another one I like:

" From that fateful day when stinking bits of slime first crawled from the sea and shouted to the cold stars, "I am man.", our greatest dread has always been the knowledge of our mortality. But tonight, we shall hurl the gauntlet of science into the frightful face of death itself. Tonight, we shall ascend into the heavens. We shall mock the earthquake. We shall command the thunders, and penetrate into the very womb of impervious nature herself. "
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 05, 2008, 04:01:56 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #2 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Blade
 
Original Title: Blade
Year: 1998
Country: United States
Director: Stephen Norrington
Rating: R
Length: 120 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
Wesley Snipes stars as the tortured soul Blade - half man, half immortal. Blade sharpens his lethal skills under the guidance of Whistler (Kris Kristofferson), his mentor, guardian and fellow hunter of the night. When the bloodthirsty Immortals' lord, Deacon Frost (Stephen Dorff), declares war on the human race, Blade is humanity's last hope for survival.

My Thoughts
I always liked vampire movies. Coat it with a hefty dose of action, and you've definitely got my attention. In that regard, Blade doesn't disappoint me. I like the concept of the Daywalker, being a half transformation with the strengths of the vampires, without the weaknesses. The movie itself is rather standard action movie run of the mill fair, but I don't know. There's still something interesting in there that I like. Can't wait to watch part 2!

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 06, 2008, 05:30:05 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #3 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Blade II
 
Original Title: Blade II
Year: 2002
Country: United States
Director: Guillermo Del Toro
Rating: R
Length: 117 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, English: DTS ES (Matrixed), French: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround, Music Only: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English

What they say
When the world is threatened by a new and deadlier breed of super vampire, the legendary Blade (Wesley Snipes) and his mentor Whistler (Kris Kristofferson) must join forces with the Bloodpack, an elite team of vampire warriors made up of Blade's sworn enemies. These ravenous fiends must be destroyed at all costs in this high-voltage adventure exploding with spectacular effects and martial arts action. The electrifying Snipes reprises his role from the original cult classic, 'Blade.'

My Thoughts
Finally! Blade shown as his superhero self, stylized combat and all! This is my favorite of the series*. As I said, Blade is finally given the superhero treatment, a new breed of über-vampire (love them!), the lovely Nyssa, lots of killings, well done effects, a betrayal you see coming miles ahead. Yeah, I like this movie a lot. Only little thing that bugged is that sometimes, it is very obvious they used CGI for some fighting moves, but hey, it's all part of making Blade the superhero he really is!

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on October 07, 2008, 04:37:42 PM
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
 
Original Title: Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: Tim Burton
Rating: 18
Length: 116 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Johnny Depp and Tim Burton join forces again in a big-screen adaptation of Stephen Sondheim's award-winning musical thiller.

My Thoughts
Okay... This is an oddball.

On one hand, you've got the brilliance of Tim Burton's visuals, which wonderfully and beautifully presents this dark story. You also have the acting chops of the likes of Johnny Depp, Helena Bonham Carter and Alan Rickman. But then, it's a musical. And at times, I found it painfully obvious that all three lead actors are NOT singers. Don't get me wrong, they still do a good job, but they acting is so far above their singing, that there's a sort of disconnect that happens with me. The emotions and atmosphere being depicted through acting and imagery, do not come across in the singing. Which is unfortunate, because the story of Sweeney Todd, while rather simplistic (betrayed man seeks revenge), still brings in elements to keep it flowing and interesting.

You know, I find myself wondering how it would've turned out, had it been decided to make a straight horror drama out of it, instead of a dark musical.

Rating:


Hmmm...I wonder if Pete has bought this one yet?!? :whistle:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 07, 2008, 04:52:20 PM
Hmmm...I wonder if Pete has bought this one yet?!? :whistle:

Don't know if he did, but I'd love to see his comments about it!  :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on October 07, 2008, 05:06:46 PM
Nope... didn't buy it... and won't buy it.

Quote from: RossRoy
You know, I find myself wondering how it would've turned out, had it been decided to make a straight horror drama out of it, instead of a dark musical.
Well if they made it a straight out horror instead of a dark musical... they would have at least sold me a copy then!  :P
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 08, 2008, 03:18:13 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #4 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Blade: Trinity
 
Original Title: Blade: Trinity
Year: 2004
Country: United States
Director: David S. Goyer
Rating: R
Length: 122 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, English: DTS ES (Matrixed), French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
Blade (Wesley Snipes) returns as the ultimate vampire hunter in the explosive third and final film, Blade: Trinity. For years, Blade has fought against the vampires in the cover of the night. But now, after falling into the crosshairs of the FBI, he is forced out into the daylight, where he is driven to join forces with a clan of human vampire hunters he never knew existed - The Nightstalkers. Together with Abigail (Jessica Biel) and Hannibal (Ryan Reynolds), two deftly trained Nightstalkers, Blade follows a trail of blood to the ancient creature that is also hunting him, the original vampire, Dracula.

My Thoughts
And this is the conclusion to the trilogy. Again, they play on the superhero side of Blade, which I already I like. Having Dracula in there as the first pureblood was a nice touch, and I like his true form! Kind of explaining the mutations seen in Blade 2.

As usual, it's a rather simple story, and they don't try to overdo it. It's an Action-Horror movie, and they stick to it. They're not trying to get a big emotional response (well, a little with Zoe (the little girl), but nothing too serious), it's just action for the sake of action. And I like it like that.

I found Ryan Reynolds a little annoying as Hannibal King, but I'm guessing it's the way the character is written that I don't like, more than him in particular. Jessica Biel is, as always, her incredibly sexy self as Abigail Whistler.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 08, 2008, 03:20:53 AM
Ugh! At that rhythm, I'm not going to meet my goal of 1 movie a day for October... But at least, I've watched more movies in the last 7 days than I have in the last 2 months! ;)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 08, 2008, 03:19:42 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #5 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Eternelle
 
Original Title: Eternal
Year: 2004
Country: Canada
Director:
Rating: 18+
Length: 107 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio:
Subtitles:

What they say
Detective Raymond Pope is a detective of questionable morals, searching for his missing wife. His investigation leads him to the wealthy estate of the enigmatic Elizabeth Kane and her young maid Irina. Under Elizabeth's fascinating looks and aristocratic manners hides a terrifying secret,shared by her companion Irina. Irina believes that her mistress is a supernatural being, perhaps the real-life 16th Century Blood Countess Elizabeth Bathory, who bathed in the blood of over 650 women in a misguided quest for eternal life. As Detective Pope finds himself perversely drawn to the powerful Elizabeth, bodies begin to surface, his inquiries only deepening the mystery surrounding Elizabeth's past. Pope's obsession grows so intense that he completely fails to anticipate Elizabeth's reaction to his intrusion into her dark world, a fatal mistake that might cost him his life and the lives of those close to him.

My Thoughts
This movie is odd. It is definitely about vampires, but they're fang-less. The main vamp's aid even puts on fake fangs to hunt. It's a bit odd. But at the same time, it makes it that much more scary, because you wouldn't know if she's human or vampire.

We also have a case where they say "Inspired by true events". Well. It may have been inspired by this story (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countess_Elizabeth_B%C3%A1thory), but it has been very lightly inspired. It's not even the main story. For one, it takes place in today's Montreal, which is explainable, seeing as she's a Vampire and immortal, but during the movie, they never really mention that. You end up guessing it by some dialog, but it's far from obvious that she is an immortal vampire, she could just as well be a serial killing mad women who kills, drinks blood and bathes in it.

The main story is about the policeman looking for his lost wife, and it's decent at best. The whole thing feels like an excuse for some softcore porn (very very softcore, mostly just kissing and fondling, you don't really see anything). But there's a lot of it. Almost all killings by the Countess are preceded by some girl on girl action (she kills only pure, virgin young girls).

But the girls in the movie are all really beautiful. Starting with the Countess, played by Caroline Neron, one of the most beautiful actress from Quebec (IMO). Even the nerdy babysitter Lisa with her big black glasses is sexy as hell.

I do have mixed feelings about this movie though. One the one hand, it is enjoyable, but I feel like it is lacking something as a movie. It's like the authors/directors couldn't find what they were really trying to do. Were they telling the story of the Countess? Doing a cop movie? A softcore porn? A horror vampire based movie? As a viewer, you don't know, and they probably didn't know themselves. Or, they may have just tried to tackle too much at once and couldn't render it the way they wanted it to be. Who knows.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 08, 2008, 05:30:28 PM
The big problem with this movie is the fact that it's a copy of the Jean Rollin's vampire movie. The Rollin's movies were made in the seventies and are quite enjoyable, but remade those movies in 2004 isn't the best idea. Another problem : Caroline Neron maybe she's good looking (and it's a real maybe since I don't find her attractive one second), but she have no talent at all. She can't act and she can't sing this is not for nothing if she didn't find a lot of works here...
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 08, 2008, 06:00:28 PM
she have no talent at all. She can't act and she can't sing this is not for nothing if she didn't find a lot of works here...

Yeah, acting wise, she doesn't fly all that high. It's like she's always playing Caroline Neron. No nuance, no nothing.


And your right also, I wouldn't be attracted to her, yet, I still find her beautiful and incredibly sexy.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: goodguy on October 08, 2008, 07:31:57 PM
Blade: Trinity
...
Jessica Biel is, as always, her incredibly sexy self as Abigail Whistler.

I don't care much for the Blade movies, but this one I found kinda amusing. Plus: Parker Posey!

Did you watch the bloopers where she outs herself as a Buffy fan by paraphrasing the Woodstock/crucification scene from S2 before breaking down giggling?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 08, 2008, 07:50:30 PM
I don't care much for the Blade movies, but this one I found kinda amusing. Plus: Parker Posey!

Yeah, I forgot about her!  ;D

Did you watch the bloopers where she outs herself as a Buffy fan by paraphrasing the Woodstock/crucification scene from S2 before breaking down giggling?

I haven't watched the extras. But I'll have to check them out now! Thanks! ;D
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 09, 2008, 03:39:24 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #6 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Man with the Screaming Brain
 
Original Title: Man with the Screaming Brain
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director: Bruce Campbell
Rating: NR
Length: 90 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:

What they say
Somewhere in Bulgaria, sleazy American industrialist William Cole (Bruce Campbell) is finalizing a tax scam that will earn him millions. Meanwhile, mad scientist Dr. Ivan Ivanov (Stacy Keach) and his demented henchmen Pavel (Ted Raimi of Xena) have created a drug that can connect human brains like Lincoln Logs. But when an illicit tryst with a sultry hotel maid leads to Cole's murder, Dr. Ivanov reanimates him by transplanting the half-brain of a former KGB operative into Cole's skull. Now, the capitalist and the communist must reconcile their differences to hunt down the beautiful gypsy freak who killed them both.

My Thoughts
I bought this movie solely on the strength of Bruce Campbell being in it. I like his work in Evil Dead, and I had recently seen, and liked, Bubba Ho-Tep when I bought this. And I liked it, but I guess I just had high expectations. I was expecting it to be really funny, but it was lacking in that department. Actually, it was even all too serious at times. Although, the restaurant scene with William Cole and Yegor fighting over what to eat and drink is really funny. But once they make the pact to hunt down the gypsy girl, it becomes rather bland and it's just a man hunting a gypsy. The dual brain part doesn't really get into it.

I'm also still wondering what the heck it was with the robots and why they were even in there! I guess it's part of the twisted humour of Bruce Campbell as a writer. Though the robots do look really creepy, making them basically the scariest part of the movie!


Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 12, 2008, 02:28:38 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #7 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
The Monster Squad
 
Original Title: The Monster Squad
Year: 1987
Country: United States
Director: Fred Dekker
Rating: PG
Length: 82 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
You know who to call when you have ghosts, but who do you call about monsters? Whether it’s a bat in your belfry or a mummy in your microwave, THE MONSTER SQUAD ain’t afraid of no ghouls!
Count Dracula has until midnight to retrieve an ancient amulet that will give him final control over the delicate balance between good and evil in the world. To help him, the creepy count calls on some old friends: the weird Wolfman, grotesque Gill-Man, mildewed Mummy and freaky Frankenstein. As the ghoulish group gets closer to the amulet, it’s up to THE MONSTER SQUAD, headquartered in the local tree house, to pool its questionable resources and stop the monster mayhem!

My Thoughts
I actually liked this one! First time I've seen it (that I can remember). I found it quite reminiscent of The Goonies, which is good! I like that they stayed true to the original makeup design for all the monsters. The kids are great in this movie, they are believable, even the lead one. I also liked how they set the tone with the opening text scroll whihc ends with "They blew it." (speaking about Dr. Van Helsing messing up the banishment of Evil). All in all, that was quite an enjoyable, light hearted movie.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 12, 2008, 03:18:53 PM
I actually liked this one! First time I've seen it (that I can remember). I found it quite reminiscent of The Goonies, which is good! I like that they stayed true to the original makeup design for all the monsters. The kids are great in this movie, they are believable, even the lead one. I also liked how they set the tone with the opening text scroll whihc ends with "They blew it." (speaking about Dr. Van Helsing messing up the banishment of Evil). All in all, that was quite an enjoyable, light hearted movie.

I finally saw this again after several years only a few weeks ago and loved it more than I remembered. I think cinema is desperate for something light and fun like this or Goonies these days.

I loved the sequences with the little girl! Fantastic delivery for a tot and her scenes with Frankenstein were wonderful:

"Don't be a chicken-shit!"  :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on October 12, 2008, 03:20:43 PM
It is definitely a fun one... Looking forward to watching it again sometime soon for the marathon myself. :)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 12, 2008, 04:13:45 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #8 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Dracula
 
Original Title: Dracula
Year: 1931
Country: United States
Director: Tod Browning
Rating: NR
Length: 398 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Mono, English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital Mono, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
For the first time ever, the original ‘Dracula’ film comes to DVD in this extraordinary Legacy Collection. Included in the collection is the original classic, starring the renowned Béla Lugosi, and three timeless sequels, featuring such legendary actors as Lon Chaney Jr, John Carradine and others. These are the landmark films that inspired an entire genre of movies and continue to be major influences on motion pictures to this day.

My Thoughts
Well, after Monster Squad, I felt the urge to revisit the classic monster movies. So I started with Dracula. Bela Lugosi in his classic performance. What more can be said? The set pieces, the lighting, the creepy atmosphere, even the silences without dialog or music all work together to form a great movie going experience. Oh sure, by today's standards it might be considered rather crude, but, personally, I marvel in its simplicity, suggesting instead of showing.

I made one mistake though: I watched it with the new Philip Glass score. It's not that the score by Glass is bad, it's actually good music (if a little repetitive), but, it's painfully obvious that it has been done years after the movie. For one thing, the music is nice and clean, I'd even say rich, which makes the sound effects and voice sound that much more thin and makes it show their age. Also, while Glass is obviously careful with his score to not overpower key dialog and sound effects, it actually makes it that much more obvious that the score isn't an integral part of the movie. The best example of that is when Renfield first arrives at Castle Dracula. When the door opens, there's a very distinct creaking sound. Well, at the very point, the Glass score becomes completely silent to emphasize the sound. Now that shows Glass wanted to preserve the sound and not affect its power in the context of the film, yet he only achieves making his score separate from the movie, because this would actually be a key moment for the music to change to convey an emotion. Same thing when Renfield cuts his finger with the letter opener. He cuts his finger and the music goes into a crescendo moments after, and it felt odd and out of place. I actually found the score to be detrimental to the movie, instead of supporting it.

I'll give this a , because of Glass' score, otherwise, it would've been a heartfelt

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 13, 2008, 04:12:51 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #9 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
The Mummy
 
Original Title: The Mummy
Year: 1932
Country: United States
Director: Karl Freund
Rating: NR
Length: 75 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, English: Dolby Digital Mono
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Boris Karloff's stellar performance as Im-Ho-Tep in the 1932 version of The Mummy is a landmark in screen history. A British archaeology team accidentally revives former high priest Im-Ho-Tep, nearly 4,000 years after he was embalmed alive. Finally free, he sets out to find his lost love, a vestal virgin sacrificed in a ritual. Powerful and mesmerizing, Im-Ho-Tep is unstoppable and terrifying in this brooding horror masterpiece. As The New York Times noted, "It begs description...One of the most unusual talkies ever produced."

My Thoughts
Continuing my Classic Monster theme. Again, this follows the same formula as Dracula. It establishes itself, and then ever so slowly builds up to the climax. The Mummy makeup is well done, but a little too soft IMO. I mean, Im-Ho-Tep had been rotting away for 3700 years, yet he looks like he is in his fifties at most. I'm not saying they shoud have shown rotting flesh and all, but they could've made him just a tad more wrinkly. But that very minor in the grand scheme of things in the movie. Karloff is effective portraying a menacing individual who will stop at nothing to gain what he wants.

One thing though, is it just me, or does it follow the exact same path as Dracula? Reveal the monster, move the story to a more modern setting, mind control the pretty lady, kill off whoever may get in the way, be killed by Dr Van Helsing...... oh sorry, I mean Dr. Muller (both are played by Edward Van Sloan)?

I still liked the movie, but something's missing. It's like the movie lacks that little spark that would've made it all tick. I don't know, the movie was enjoyable, but not quite as chilling as it could've been.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 15, 2008, 05:09:07 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #10 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
The Wolf Man
 
Original Title: The Wolf Man
Year: 1941
Country: United States
Director: George Waggner
Rating: NR
Length: 281 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Mono, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
The original horror classic that introduced one of the screen's most infamous monsters! Lon Chaney Jr. portrays Larry Talbot, who returns to his father's (Claude Rains) castle in Wales and meets a beautiful woman (Evelyn Ankers). One fateful night, Talbot escorts her to a local carnival where Jenny's fate is revealed by a mysterious gypsy fortune teller. The dreamlike atmosphere and elaborate settings combined with a chiling musical score make The Wolf Man a masterpiece not only of the genre, but for all time! 70 min.

My Thoughts
Pete, I finally understand why you had his picture as an avatar for so long. What a movie, and what a performance by Lon Chaney Jr.! His easy going demeanor, almost child like innocence in how he seduces Gwen, yet, he ends up having to live with such a terrible beast within, and with the guilt of what he knows he did. Again, like its predecessors, the atmosphere of the movie, the foggy forest and streets, the performance of the actors (Bela Lugosi as Bela the Gypsy - it's just sad it didn't last longer! Such an air of mystery about him). The Wolf makeup is extremely well done (although, I can't say the same about the transformation scene, though they probably did the best they could with the technology and techniques available at the time).

I loved every minute of that movie. I should've watched it long before today!


Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 17, 2008, 04:28:58 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #11 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Creature from the Black Lagoon
 
Original Title: Creature from the Black Lagoon
Year: 1954
Country: United States
Director: Jack Arnold
Rating: NR
Length: 241 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, English: Dolby Digital Mono, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: French, Spanish

What they say
Who knows what undiscovered life forms inhabit the bodies of water on our planet? When scientists exploring the Amazon River stumble on a "missing link" connecting humans an fish, they plan to capture it for later study. But the creature jhas plans of his own, inspired by the lead scientist's (Richard Carlson) beautiful fiancee, Kay (Julie Adams). This classic thriller is a genuine tribute to imaginative storytelling and an exceptional showcase for the legendary makeup artistry of Bud Westmore.

My Thoughts
Continuing on my journey through the classic monster movies. This time, is was Creature from the Black Lagoon. I enjoyed the film. I found it to have some nice underwater imagery. The gill man suit is well done. The story is kept interesting, with the discovery of a fossilized amphibian hand leading to the expedition to the black lagoon, but it's still a pretty standard monster story. It thrives on its imagery and atmosphere, though this movie is a lot less atmospheric than say Dracula or The Wolf Man. But they still manage to build some tension, especially during the underwater scenes.

I'll say this though. If you ever go through the classic monsters one after another, don't watch Creature from Black Lagoon right after The Wolf Man, Dracula or Frankenstein. On its own, it's a pretty good film, but when compared to the classic three, it pales in comparison and shows flaws you may not notice otherwise.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on October 17, 2008, 10:05:43 AM
Glad you enjoyed the Wolf Man as much as you did... And I agree... Creature from the Black Lagoon is good... but not as good as the other classics.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 18, 2008, 07:05:03 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #12 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
The Invisible Man
 
Original Title: The Invisible Man
Year: 1933
Country: United States
Director: James Whale
Rating: NR
Length: 386 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: French, Spanish

What they say
Renowned acting legend Claude Rains made a remarkable screen debut in The Invisible Man, based on H.G. Well's acclaimed novel. Rains, a mysterious doctor, creates a serum that makes him invisible. But the miraculous potion also has the power to drive him mad, as he discovers when he is forced to commit horrific acts of terror. Directed by the master of the macabre, James Whale, The Invisible Man set the standard for dazzling special effects with ingenious techniques that are still imitated today.

My Thoughts
Another day, another entry in the Classic "Monster" revisit.

Amazing. Not the film, the special effects. This is 1933. They didn't have green screen with CGI.  The feat they pulled of here is mervelous. I was completely taken aback by the special effects the first time The Invisible Man removes his bandages. I don't know what I was expecting, but certainly not for him to actually be invisible (ok ok yes, there are some anomalies that give it away, but shhhh!) Big thumbs up to the special effects team!

As for the film itself, well I'm puzzled. Why was it made part of the Classic Monster Legacy Collection? He's not a monster per-se. There's no reanimating the dead (Frankenstein, Dracula), he's not a long lost living creature (Gill-man), or even a man with a best inside (Wolf Man).. He's simply a scientist who discovered how make himself invisible, and got mad in the process. Nothing monstruous there. Ah well, probably explains why The Invisible Man wasn't in Monster Squad to begin with.

Other than that, it's a decent Mad scientist story. All the elements are there: power hungry, found a special technology/formula to allow him to gain power by questionable means, and he's mad, as well as madly in love (even though this angle is not played too much)!

The movie thrives on the special effects. And they work, really well.



Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 18, 2008, 07:14:57 PM
As for the film itself, well I'm puzzled. Why was it made part of the Classic Monster Legacy Collection? He's not a monster per-se. There's no reanimating the dead (Frankenstein, Dracula), he's not a long lost living creature (Gill-man), or even a man with a best inside (Wolf Man).. He's simply a scientist who discovered how make himself invisible, and got mad in the process. Nothing monstruous there. Ah well, probably explains why The Invisible Man wasn't in Monster Squad to begin with.

Oooh, I have to strongly and passionately disagree! The Invisible Man is a monster, both in himself and what he becomes. He is monstrous in the same way that Frankenstein is the real monster, not his creation. He is messing with nature and though I'm not religious, considering the age of the story, he is also an affront to God. His madness is kind of a payoff; that such a monstrous act cannot be allowed to succeed.

And then on a more basic level, he is the ultimate boogie man (I don't mean he dances well!). He has a vulgar amount of power in his invisible state.

A monster by definition is an impossible freak of nature. He's that and deserves his place.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 18, 2008, 07:19:22 PM
You know, I hadn't considered that angle, at all. I saw him with my modern, technical mind: He got mad because of the stuff he created, and is a scientist experimenting with new things. Nothing more, nothing less.

But now that you mention it... Yeah, you are totally right. He had to have a reason to actually want to become invisible. And then, while he is invisible, he strives for power and actually wants to kill people to achieve it.

You are entirely right. Sorry, my bad!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 19, 2008, 06:33:43 PM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #13 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Frankenstein
 
Original Title: Frankenstein
Year: 1931
Country: United States
Director: James Whale
Rating: NR
Length: 384 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Mono, Spanish: Dolby Digital Mono
Subtitles: French, Spanish

What they say
Boris Karloff stars as the screen's most memorable monster in what many consider to be the greatest horror film ever made. Dr. Frankenstein (Colin Clive) dares to tamper with life and death be creating a human monster (Karloff) out of lifeless body parts. It's director James Whale's adaptation of the Mary Shelley novel blended with Karloff's compassionate performance of a creature groping for identity that makes Frankenstein a masterpiece not only of the genre, but for all time. 70 min.

My Thoughts
And thus, my Classic Monster revisit comes to an end. An end which was entirely planned to be on a high note. Ending with my favorite monster of the six: Frankenstein.

I guess to me, this is the whole "magic" Jon keeps referring to when talking about what makes a movie work. I can't really put a name or point a finger that what makes me like this movie so much, I just do. It just clicks in place, takes me in its atmosphere with the creepy castle, and never lets me go, right until the very end. Boris Karloff gives a great performance as Frankenstein's monster. Yet, in pretty much the same way Gene Wilder does in Young Frankenstein, I think Colin Clive steals the show as the demented Dr Henry Frankenstein. His delivery of the now classic line "It's Alive!" over and over always gives me shivers (don't ask why, I have no idea, it just does). This is a great movie!

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 19, 2008, 07:14:31 PM
I love Frankenstien too. Way ahead of its time, perhaps even now. I doubt they'd have the guts to do the lake scene with the same stark approach. I've heard Guillermo del Toro has a version planned, which should be good, and I trust him to come up with a version for this generation, but the original can't be improved upon. Somehow I expect del Toro won't try and will instead produce a tribute act, like An American Werewolf in London is a homage to the original wolfman.

I still haven't seen Bride of Frankenstein. Have you?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 19, 2008, 08:20:52 PM
I still haven't seen Bride of Frankenstein. Have you?

I have seen it, but it's been a while. I remember liking it very much, it is a very worthy sequel.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 20, 2008, 04:46:27 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #14 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Bad Taste
 
Original Title: Bad Taste
Year: 1987
Country: New Zealand
Director: Peter Jackson
Rating: NR
Length: 92 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.66:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, English: DTS ES (Discrete), English: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles:

What they say
When an army of evil aliens invades earth with the intention of selling mankind as intergalactic hamburger meat, the New Zealand government calls in an elite team of psychotic assassins. But are these boys brutal enough to tackle the vilest villains in the universe? Get ready for the ultimate battle of flying guts, splattering brains, exploding sheep and guzzling vomit. This is more than just one of the greatest - and most disgusting - horror comedies ever made. This is 'BAD TASTE'!

You have never seen anything like 'BAD TASTE'! This legendary low-budget debut from producer/director/co-writer/star 'Peter Jackson' is packed with all the outrageous action, senseless violence and sick humor that has made it one of the most radical cult classics of all time. Restored and newly transferred from original vault materials, 'BAD TASTE' is now presented 'completely uncut, uncensored and unrated' in all its gory glory!

My Thoughts
Another example that shows you don't need a multi million dollar budget to make an entertaining film. All you need is imagination, a vision, some time and the will to make it a reality. In this case, over the top gore, mixed in with a well balanced dose of humour and a good basic premise all come together to form a good movie, and a very entertaining one.

Peter Jackson is simply sick ... and I love it!

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 20, 2008, 06:32:11 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #15 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
Dead Alive
 
Original Title: Braindead
Year: 1992
Country: New Zealand
Director: Peter Jackson
Rating: NR
Length: 97 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: French, Spanish

What they say
Throw out all your preconceptions about the limits of horror! A new standard has been set with Dead Alive - The Mother of All Horror Films.

On a quiet street, in a small town, pure evil has come to stay. Lionel, an innocent young man, is forced to care for his domineering mother and finds the task a whole lot more demanding after she's bitten by the cursed Sumatran rat monkey. Passing the point of death, Lionel's mother sucks friends and family into her gruesome existence among the living dead and Lionel is sent spiraling into a goulish nightmare.

Now a crazed zombie, she soon infects enough people to make it difficult for Lionel, still the faithful son, to keep the neighbors from suspecting that something is terribly wrong.

Dead Alive is dripping with state-of-the-art special effects that feature mutilations, rock 'n roll dismemberments and household appliances, combining into the most bizarre ending ever filmed. 

My Thoughts
Hahaha! I love that film! What's not to like? It's sick, it's gory, it's all fun! So many memorable scenes: the park scene, the priest kick ass, both meal scenes, obviously the final zombie mow down, even the bizarre freudian ending!

There's even one liners: "Party's Over!", "I kick ass for the Lord!", etc.

And if all that is not enough to keep you coming back, there's also the always beautiful Paquita!

(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/48/3665fe7.th.jpg) (http://img504.imageshack.us/my.php?image=3665fe7.jpg)(http://img504.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif) (http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php)

So, if you like your comedy horror gory, bloody and zombie filled, this is a must see!

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on October 20, 2008, 07:08:56 AM
I had the chance to watch Braindead (a.k.a. Dead Alive) in a cinema! Together with hundreds of horror loving freaks. What a fun we had with this third film by Peter Jackson; which I enjoy all three, by the way. Gore, romance and comedy had never been mixed better before and since.

Bad Taste is great fun too, but shows its low budget a lot more. Gore is less but when it's there it's total gross out (that guy eating with a spoon in the opening sequence :laugh:)

It's still surprising to me how Jackson went on to make stuff like The Frighteners and then the LOTR Trilogy... Not that those are bad films, just not what you'd expect after the first three. Unfortunately he's probably to spoiled now to return to those roots and make another gore classic. :shrug:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 20, 2008, 03:45:55 PM
Unfortunately he's probably to spoiled now to return to those roots and make another gore classic. :shrug:

I'm not sure I want to imagine Bad Taste and Braindead made with a budget to look real.. I don't think they'd be as good.


Gore is less but when it's there it's total gross out (that guy eating with a spoon in the opening sequence :laugh:)

Personally, it's the green stuff Robert regurgitate that they then all eat, including one of the human, who actually ends up liking the stuff! (http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/7553/vomitsmiley7502uw9.gif)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on October 20, 2008, 03:51:59 PM
I'm not sure I want to imagine Bad Taste and Braindead made with a budget to look real.. I don't think they'd be as good.
Well, of course. Kind of what I meant. Even if he were to use a small budget just for the heck of it, not sure it would still work.


Personally, it's the green stuff Robert regurgitate that they then all eat, including one of the human, who actually ends up liking the stuff! (http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/7553/vomitsmiley7502uw9.gif)
I rewatched both again tonight mainly inspired by your reviews here. I agree on Bad Taste and in Dead Alive it's the scene where Uncle Wes pulls out the priest's teeth which makes me cringe every time.


They are both great films, just having seen them again. While Bad Taste won't probably improve too much and is almost supported by all the grain and the not-so-perfect transfer I really wish I could own Braindead (I mention this title as Dead Alive is actually cut by approx. 7 minutes) on Blu-ray.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 28, 2008, 05:17:04 AM
October Horror Marathon 2008 - Entry #16 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4158.msg80531.html#msg80531)
The Frighteners
 
Original Title: The Frighteners
Year: 1996
Country: New Zealand
Director: Peter Jackson (1961)
Rating: R
Length: 123 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Michael J. Fox stars as Frank Bannister, a small-town "ghostbuster" in league with the very spirits he's supposed to be exorcising. The scam works well until a powerful spirit goes on a muderous rampage, forcing Frank to find a way to stop the diabolical ghoul in this special-effects-packed supernatural chiller that's so fiendishly entertaining, it's frightening!

My Thoughts
This movie is a complete blast! I loved every minute of it! From beginning to end! Everybody is just great in it, but I particularly liked Jeffrey Combs as the FBI agent. But it's no surprise. I mean, can this guy be bad in anything? Everything I've seen him in, he's great! And here is no exception!

Oh and, I think I'm in love : Trini Alvarado
(http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9540/trinialvaradowp3.th.jpg) (http://img401.imageshack.us/my.php?image=trinialvaradowp3.jpg)(http://img401.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif) (http://g.imageshack.us/thpix.php)
 :drooling: :drooling: :drooling:

Another winner for Peter Jackson.  :thumbup:

To think that this movie led directly to Lord of the Rings. Peter Jackson says so in the introduction. Lord of the Rings started being conceived during post-production of this movie. He needed a project that would make use of all the computers he bought.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 01, 2008, 11:26:27 PM
Well, 16 movies watched for the October marathon. A little short of my goal of 31, although I knew I'd never get there. Still, I'm glad to have made it to 16. After all, Chicken Chaser* is taking a lot of my time too!




* Fable II ;)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 01, 2008, 11:40:21 PM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #1 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Ocean's 11
 
Original Title: Ocean's 11
Year: 1960
Country: United States
Director: Lewis Milestone
Rating: NR
Length: 127 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Mono, French: Dolby Digital Mono, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
New Year's Eve in Las Vegas. Roulette wheels spin, cards snap, slots chime, champagne fizzes, the shows go on…and the lights go out. It's the perfect time to steal a kiss or a $25 chip. But for Danny Ocean (Frank Sinatra) and his 10 partners in crime, it's the perfect moment to steal millions.

Sinatra and off-screen pals Dean Martin, Sammy Davis Jr., Peter Lawford, Joey Bishop and more play army buddies who devise a scheme to knock out power to the Vegas strip, electronically rig five big casino vaults and raid them all at the same instant. Packed with location-lensed glamour, sweaty suspense, swinging comedy and a stunning twist ending.

My Thoughts
I don't know what to think. I've seen the remake a while ago, and I remember enjoying it a lot, thinking it was entertaining and fun. So I thought the original would be pretty much the same. And in a sense, it is. You've got a bunch of stars having fun making a light hearted movie. Thing is, to me, the stars of the remake are much more Stars, than the Rat Pack. Oh sure, I know the members of the rat pack, but mostly for their music. Not much for their film work. And I think this might've dragged down my enjoyment of it a little. Ok, a lot.

The film, by itself, without the star power, is not really all that interesting to me. I mean, the movie starts with the heist already all planned out, so they're right smack in the middle of preparations, with gathering the gang together. The preparation of the heist itself is not that entertaining, nor suspenseful. The heist itself is pretty bland. I guess the high point is the ending, with that twist at the end. It's like the whole movie never found a rhythm, which is surprising, seeing as it is so star studded with famous singers of the swing era. ;)

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 02, 2008, 03:40:07 AM
I don't know what to think. I've seen the remake a while ago, and I remember enjoying it a lot, thinking it was entertaining and fun. So I thought the original would be pretty much the same. And in a sense, it is. You've got a bunch of stars having fun making a light hearted movie. Thing is, to me, the stars of the remake are much more Stars, than the Rat Pack. Oh sure, I know the members of the rat pack, but mostly for their music. Not much for their film work. And I think this might've dragged down my enjoyment of it a little. Ok, a lot.

The film, by itself, without the star power, is not really all that interesting to me. I mean, the movie starts with the heist already all planned out, so they're right smack in the middle of preparations, with gathering the gang together. The preparation of the heist itself is not that entertaining, nor suspenseful. The heist itself is pretty bland. I guess the high point is the ending, with that twist at the end. It's like the whole movie never found a rhythm, which is surprising, seeing as it is so star studded with famous singers of the swing era. ;)

First things first, the original Ocean's 11 is known as a not very good film and just a showcase for the Rat Pack. On that score at least I think it works well, if indulgent, and I love the ending. However the new one is the far better film all round.

It's a fantastic cast in the new one and I enjoy most of Clooney and Pitts work, not to mention the others. But they don't come close to the star power of Sinatra or Martin. That group were a phenomenon. Their film lives and dies by the sword; on one hand, it was the same real playboy group on screen as off, but they larked around so much the film is bloated. Sinatra didn't bother turning up most days! It's fun because of their personalities and the music, which only they knew how to do properly.

Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin were excellent actors in other work at least. The Manchurian Candidate, Von Ryan's Express and Rio Bravo are amongst my favourites and I can watch them anytime.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 02, 2008, 05:22:13 AM
Frank Sinatra and Dean Martin were excellent actors in other work at least. The Manchurian Candidate, Von Ryan's Express and Rio Bravo are amongst my favourites and I can watch them anytime.

I have seen The Manchurian Candidate and I agree, it's a great film. As for the other two, well since you mention them in the same sentence as Manchurian Candidate, I guess this gives them a fast track to my wishlist!

On the subject of star power, while I fully understand that in their time, Sinatra and Dean Martin were "it", to me, being the youngster that I am, they don't pack as much punch. Like I said, I know who they are, and love them for their musical work, but I'm far from familiar with their movie work.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 02, 2008, 01:07:23 PM
Von Ryan's Express (Sinatra) is a typical Boy's Own WWII adventure story, so it's simple, but a lot of fun, while Rio Bravo is one of the greatest westerns ever with John Wayne. Dean martin plays the drunk and it is superb. Even if you don't usually like westerns, this will likely be the exception (I think Pete enjoys it and there's no gore! :laugh:)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 03, 2008, 05:24:28 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #2 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Lord of War
 
Original Title: Lord of War
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director: Andrew Niccol
Rating: R
Length: 122 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
Chance leads Yuri Orlov to discover his one talent - illegal arms dealing. With his brother's help, he reaches the top of his trade, supplying anyone whose check clears. His skills and quick wits bring him everything he's ever wanted - and help him elude a persistent Interpol agent. But at the peak of his prowess, he discovers his customers might demand more than he can give ... and those he's trying to protect could become deadly liabilities. 

My Thoughts
This is a nice movie. We follow the story of Yuri Orlov in his ascension to become a major player in illegal arms dealing. The story itself is pretty straightforward, with not much twist, and actually developing pretty much how you'd expect. What makes this movie actually interesting is in how Yuri Orlov tells the story. Don't forget, we're talking about the story of a guy who sells illegal arms to some of the most wretched members of humanity, yet, he tells the story the same as if someone would be talking about his ascension as a renowned gourmet Chef. He is really casual about it, and it makes the movie that much more interesting.

The opening shot of the movie sets the tone well. You have Yuri standing in the middle of thousands if spent shell casing, casually telling us that he's an arms dealer. It then cuts to a bullet being manufactured. From the sheet metal being punched, right through to the bullet being loaded, and fired into someone's head. While it is a dark opening, the choice of music during that shot actually sets the tone of the movie really well.

The whole story is said from the point of view of Yuri, in flashback sequences. The movie ends full circle, with the ending of the opening shot. The movie also ends with the mention that is it based on actual events. Of course, how much of those "actual events" actually happened is up in the air.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 04, 2008, 05:31:31 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #3 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Remember the Titans
 
Original Title: Remember the Titans
Year: 2000
Country: United States
Director: Boaz Yakin
Rating: PG
Length: 114 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: DTS 5.1, English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
History is written by the winners.

Academy Award winner Denzel Washington (The Hurricane) gives a victorious performance in this stirring and uplifting film. Based on a real-life drama, Remember The Titans is a rousing celebration of how a town torn apart by resentment, friction and mistrust comes together in triumphant harmony. The year is 1971. After leading his team to fifteen winning seasons, football coach Bill Yoast (Will Patton) is demoted and replaced by Herman Boone (Washington), tough, opinionated and as different from the beloved Yoast as he could be. How these two men overcome their differences, and turn a group of hostile young men into champions, plays out in a remarkable and triumphant story full of soul and spirit. You and your family will never forget the Titans. 

My Thoughts
In one word: Wow! I was taken aback. I wasn't expecting to be moved by this movie. I was expecting a standard story about two different factions of teens getting together and winning football games. I didn't expect the metaphor about racial segregation, much less the fact that it's a true story. I always thought of sports movies as a great medium to tell very human stories. Well, you don't get much more "human" than the end of segregation. All the hatred, the irrational fear of the other "race". They're all depicted very well in the movie. I especially like the scene between team captain Gerry Bertier (the white guy) and Julius Campbell (the black guy) where they basically tell each other that they're liars and no truth will ever be said by either "race", which then leads the them telling each other the whole truth, which happens the be pretty much the same thing: I will not risk my hide for the opposite race. After that scene, they start getting  together and actually forming a team. Becoming friends, getting to know each other, and actually bonding.

The football scenes in the movie are nice, but they're really a means to an end. A way to show the kids (and coach, as well a townspeople) getting to know each other, realizing they like the same things, live the same lives, root for the same teams, etc. Of course, for some it's harder than others, and it's showcased well in the final game.

Again, this movie is great at showing that prejudice and mistrust only lead to more prejudice and mistrust. Get to know some members of "that other race" whatever it is (be it color based, religion/belief based, or even political based). You'll find that their preoccupations are not all that far from yours. You may even find some great friend in the process. That's what this movie is all about. That's what being human is all about.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: richierich on November 04, 2008, 10:41:35 AM
Glad you enjoyed Remember the Titans Seb, I also was pleasantly surprised after viewing it and it certainly makes an impact. One of the better 'real-life to film' adaptations I've seen.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 06, 2008, 12:12:54 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #4 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Nos Voisins Dhantsu
 
Original Title: Nos Voisins Dhantsu
Year: 2007
Country: Canada (Quebec)
Director: Alain Chicoine
Rating: G
Length: 92 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: French: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Stereo, English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French

What they say - (Google translation, summarily reread by me)
Réal Béland and his partner Stéphane K. Lefebvre, two crazy and provocative reporters, are in the city of TOKYO to measure tolerance and sense of humor of the Japanese. Sometimes costumed with stagings chiseled and repeated, sometimes unannounced, sometimes with the help of other actors and local people, they will bring crazyness where nobody has ever seen.

A dynamic and different from the Japanese universe.

My Thoughts
How to classify this? I guess you could say it's a "prankumentary". Basically, they set out to test the sense of humour of our "Voisins Dhantsu" (graphical variation of "Voisins d'en dessous", meaning "Neighbours from down under" or something like that).

What they did is go out there, and do all sorts of crazy stuff. From playing hockey in the middle of the busiest intersection in Tokyo, to going "Japanese Hunting" in a hotel at 3am, to getting arrested for disturbing the peace in an art gallery! I found the whole process really funny, with many laugh out loud moments. But if there's one thing to come out of it all, besides that fact that Real Beland and Stephane K Lefebvre are two really crazy mofo, it's that Japanese people are insanely patient and polite (except the art people  :laugh:).

It's not the kind of humour everybody will like, but it is something I like a lot! So I recommend it wholeheartedly!

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on November 06, 2008, 12:59:25 AM
It's not the kind of humour everybody will like
I suppose that it's exactly the same kind of thing they do on their show broadcast presently at the "Canal D"? I've tried to watch it a couple of time and this is not my kind of humour at all. Humour is supposed to be funny not pissing off people by disrespect them and their country, but since it's Real Beland I'm not surprise to not finding that funny at all.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 06, 2008, 01:33:10 AM
not pissing off people by disrespect them and their country, but since it's Real Beland I'm not surprise to not finding that funny at all.

That's a point of view. There are some sketch that border on being no respectful at all, but most of the time, the Japanese they prank are really good sport about it. Most are just laughing at what they do, or simply ignoring them. The only ones who got pissed off are the art people. But that's because they were playing with paint around art items, and they were scared of damage. Other than that, it's not all that bad.

But yeah, you are right, it's basically the same thing they do on "Au delà du Réal" or on the similarly "Les Cousins du vrai monde".
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 06, 2008, 06:10:48 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #5 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Aurore
 
Original Title: Aurore
Year: 2005
Country: Canada (Quebec)
Director: Luc Dionne
Rating: 16+
Length: 110 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: French: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French

What they say - (translated from French)
Quebec, May 1909 - It is dawn on Sainte-Philomène-de-Cartierville. Anne-Marie Caron, wife of Télésphore Gagnon, gives birth to their second daughter. Born at dawn, the child will be known as Aurore.

Aurore grew up in a united and happy family. That is, until tuberculosis changes everything. This disease carries away Aurore's adored mother.

Widow of just one week, Télésphore Gagnon, bewitched by his beautiful cousin Marie-Anne Houde, decides to marry her. Marie-Anne Houde then moved into the house and imposes her law.

The atmosphere of the house changes. Marie-Anne Houde is show in a different light. Sainte-Philomène-de-Cartierville shuts up and closes on itself. The young Aurore Gagnon dies. The inquest revealed that she died of blood poisoning due to abuse and numerous injuries inflicted by her stepmother. A highly publicized story that will simmer throughout Quebec, which will mark our collective memory forever.

My Thoughts
Like the back cover of the DVD says, this story has touched everyone in Quebec in one way or another. Everybody is affected by this story. Of course, being such a relatively old story, it all happened at the beginning of the last century after all, it has been ingrained in our collective cultural heritage here in Quebec. Even before seeing this movie, or the one that came before it, or before reading about it, I was still very much aware of Aurore's suffering, and the collective indifference to her situation.

Unfortunately, movies being the beast they are, and the actual events taking place so long ago, there's no way to know how much of it real, and how much of it was romanced. Still, from what I've read of the case in the past, they couldn't be all that far. And that, makes it a movie that is hard to bear. You know it actually happened. You know a young girl had to go through this. You know she wasn't alone. You know she wasn't the first. You know she wasn't the last.

I may be reading more than I should into this movie. But I can't help it. I can't help but think of all these children who are being abused, to this day, by a parent and/or close relative, and nobody will say anything. So many kids have had their lives turned into hell, only because nobody will talk.

And that's what this movie is all about. Yes, it's telling Aurore's story in particular. Yes, it's easy to say that the movie may not be faithful to the actual event. Yes, it's also easy to say that the movie is flawed because it may have tried to show the stepmother as being mad, instead of just mean.

But that's not the point. That's not what the director intended.

Aurore's story is mean to an end. What he's doing, is showing how a full community becomes just as guilty as the parents, because they ignored the cries of the children. Everybody knew, yet nobody did anything until it was too late. Everybody had their suspicions. Nobody went in, or even confronted the parents. Even after Aurore was treated for a full month in a hospital.

That's the message of the movie. If you have reason to suspect something, say something. Don't wait until it's too late.

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on November 06, 2008, 06:29:05 AM
Certainly a good French Canadian movie that I've seen at the movie theatre, in fact this is the last time I've gone to a cinema. Not really the genre of movie that I watch usually, but much better than a lot of movie made recently here (movie that are really cheapest ripoff of United States productions).

But I prefer the original  :P

Don't worry I'm not really serious, but have you seen it too?
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 06, 2008, 06:30:55 AM
But I prefer the original  :P

Well Pete probably would hehe :laughing:

Don't worry I'm not really serious, but have you seen it too?

But no I haven't. And after seeing this one, I'm not sure I really want to see it. From what I heard, the whole story was basically reduced to a simple horror story. Aurore deserves much better.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 12, 2008, 06:48:39 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #6 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
K-PAX
 
Original Title: K-PAX
Year: 2001
Country: United States
Director: Iain Softley
Rating: PG
Length: 120 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: DTS 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
Two-time Academy Award® winner 'Kevin Spacey' and Academy Award® nominee 'Jeff Bridges' star in this spellbinding, often humorous story of a mysterious stranger who defies convention, puzzles the experts and leaves everyone searching for the truth.

A stranger who calls himself Prot (Spacey) seemingly appears out of nowhere following a disturbance at New York's Grand Central Station. Claiming to come from the distant planet K-PAX, Prot draws the attention of jaded Dr. Powell (Bridges), whose initial skepticism soon turns to fascination and amazement. Even a team of leading scientists are at a loss to explain Prot's detailed knowledge of the star system he calls home. But with Prot's return to K-PAX fast approaching, the search for answers intensifies and the mystery takes on pulse-quickening proportions.

My Thoughts
I found this to be a nice little mystery story. Kevin spacey plays the role well, and the story develops at a decent enough pace to keep things interesting, while not revealing too much. I also like the ending. Without telling too much about it, let's just say it may leave you scratching your head as to what really happened. And I like that. Make the viewer question the events. Make the viewer think. And this movie does it well. Nothing too fancy, but it's effective.

One thing I'd like to know though: How did Kevin Spacey manage to eat an unpeeled banana without flinching. :yucky:

Rating:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on November 12, 2008, 12:09:43 PM
I remember catching this on cable one day and enjoying it... haven't thought of it since... I wouldn't mind adding this one to my collection as well.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 24, 2008, 02:43:43 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #7 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Iron Man: Steelbook Edition
 
Original Title: Iron Man: Steelbook Edition
Year: 2008
Country: Canada
Director:
Rating: PG
Length: 125 Min.
Video: Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Lift off with high-speed, high-flying action in this Ultimate 2-disc Edition that takes you inside the suit of Marvel's invincible superhero for the ultimate Iron Man experience!

After surviving an unexpected attack in enemy territory, jet-setting industrialist Tony Stark builds a high-tech suit of armor and vows to protect the world as Iron Man. Straight from the pages of the legendary comic book, Iron Man is a hero who is built - not born - to be unlike any other!

My Thoughts
I must say, I didn't know much about Iron Man before seeing this movie. Never read any of the comic books or seen any material about the character. So what did I think of the movie? I loved it! It's great as a superhero movie. It's got some good humor. It's got some tension. And as an origin story, it's really good too. Robert Downey is awesome in the role. And I hope the little surprise at the end will indeed to lead to what it is hinting to ;)


Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 24, 2008, 02:47:12 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #8 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
The Incredible Hulk
 
Original Title: The Incredible Hulk
Year: 2008
Country: USA
Director: Louis Leterrier
Rating: PG-13
Length: 114 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Other, English:
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Academy Award nominee Edward Norton stars as scientist Bruce Banner, a man who has been living in shadows, scouring the planet for an antidote to the unbridled force of rage within him: the Hulk. But when the military masterminds who dream of exploiting his powers force him back to civilization, he finds himself coming face to face with his most formidable foe: the Abomination - a nightmarish beast of pure aggression whose powers match the Hulk's own!

Also starring Liv Tyler, Oscar nominee Tim Roth, and Oscar winner William Hurt, The Incredible Hulk is "steeped in action spectacular special effects" (Claudia Puig, USA TODAY) and delivers a mind-blowing final showdown that can only be summed up with one word... INCREDIBLE!

My Thoughts
Now that's what the first Hulk movie should've been! The special effects are great. Edward Norton is great in the title role. This was a great superhero movie. And again, like the surprise in Iron Man, I hope the surprise in this does lead to something ;)

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 24, 2008, 02:55:36 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #9 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
Pan's Labyrinth
 
Original Title: El Laberinto del fauno
Year: 2006
Country: Mexico
Director: Guillermo Del Toro
Rating: 14A
Length: 119 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: Spanish: DTS ES (Discrete), Spanish: Dolby Digital Surround EX, French: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
From acclaimed director Guillermo Del Toro ('Blade II', 'Hellboy') comes a dark fantasy/thriller about a young girl who enters a mysterious labyrinth and finds herself at the center of a ferocious battle between Good and Evil. 

My Thoughts
It is not often that I watch a movie after hearing all the hype surrounding it and end up liking it as much as the hype hints to. I loved the film. The story is well told, and the contrast between the fantasy world and the real world is well played. The character design is awesome: we've all seen the Fauno on the posters, and I love its look. Guillermo Del Toro did a good job crafting a world beyond reality that is fantastic, at the same time as it is scary.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 24, 2008, 05:38:17 AM
November Alphabet Marathon 2008 - Entry #10 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5035.msg82545.html#msg82545)
D.E.B.S.
 
Original Title: D.E.B.S.
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: G
Length: 91 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1, Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
Sultry crime boss Lucy Diamond (Jordana Brewster, The Fast And The Furious) is back in the states and the D.E.B.S. - an elite team of paramilitary college co-ed super spies - are hot on her trail. But when their top agent, gorgeous Amy Bradshaw (Sara Foster, The Big Bounce), mysteriously disappears after coming face to face with the attractive young villainess, the D.E.B.S. begin a full-scale search for Lucy's secret lair, never suspecting that Amy may not want to be rescued after all, in this smart and sexy spy spoof. 

My Thoughts
Okay. Not at ALL what I expected when I bought that. Granted, didn't know a single thing about it when I bought it. Even after reading the back of the case, it never struck me. I thought I was getting a spoof of spy movies with five hot ladies in all the major roles. So some laughs and action, but with sexy ladies doing the moves. What did I get? This is basically a romantic comedy with a coating of spy parody! Talk about being taken completely off guard. I'm not sure what to think of it all. I mean, it did keep my interest, but it's not something I'm eager to view again. As a spy spoof, it's pretty weak. Not too many laughs, those that are there seem forced. As a romantic comedy, well it sort of works. There's good chemistry between the two actresses. And I like how the movie portrayed the lesbian relationship as being totally normal and casual. It's shown as just two people falling in love. The movie doesn't take itself seriously, and it's better for it. Each little part of it is not fully realized, and unfortunately for the movie, as a whole, it's not much better. It's the kind of movie where you get a bottle of Pepsi Cola, a big bowl of pop corn, turn your brain off, and enjoy.

I'll say one thing though: the girls look great! Especially Janet (Jill Ritchie - left most girl on the cover), and of course Lucy Diamond (Jordana Brewster - not shown on the cover).

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 07, 2008, 06:18:28 AM
The Big Bang Theory: Season 1
 
Original Title: The Big Bang Theory
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: 1. Pilot
Rating: R
Length: 355 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: Chinese, English, French, Korean, Portuguese, Spanish, Thai

What they say
Physicists Leonard and Sheldon understand everything from the inescapable gravitational pull of a black hole to the intricate structure of the atom. But take those atoms and assemble them into a woman, and their comprehension comes to a grinding halt. And when Penny, a woman will all those atoms in all the right places, moves in aross the hall, Leonard and Sheldon's universe begins to expand in ways they could never have imaged.

When series creators Chuck Lorre ('Two and a Half Men') and Bill Prady ('Dharma & Greg') combine equal parts science, superheroes and sex and add stars Johnny Galecki ('Roseanne') and Jim Parsons ('Judging Amy'), the result is an explosively funny comedy for the nerd in all of us.

My Thoughts
I know I was supposed to watch it at the same time as you guys, but, things got in the way and I never actually did get further than disc 1. But fear not, it was not because i didn't like it. Actually, I liked it so much that now that I decided to actually finish watching the season, I started over! From the beginning!

I must say, I love that show. I had never heard of it before seeing it mentioned here, and basically bought it blind. But I'm oh so very glad I did. I thought it was good from the first minute, to the very last.

Favourite character? Sheldon, easily. While I like all of them, Sheldon has that little something more. He's the star IMO. The funniest lines are his. His physical play matches the character perfectly. Jim Parsons really does an awesome job at playing Sheldon. I love the episode where he's sick - it is so funny!

I can only add this: You owe it to yourself to give this show a spin. You won't regret it.

Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on December 07, 2008, 08:55:40 AM
I can only add this: You owe it to yourself to give this show a spin. You won't regret it.
I am in the IT business and thus by definition a bit nerdy. As you may know, in germnay everything foreign language-y is dubbed and most people have an aversion to watch anything that's not dubbed. But we (first I then my working buddies, too) have shown the show to several people (in english of course) and each and every one of them loved it from the start.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 07, 2008, 11:00:24 AM
Favourite character? Sheldon, easily. While I like all of them, Sheldon has that little something more. He's the star IMO. The funniest lines are his. His physical play matches the character perfectly. Jim Parsons really does an awesome job at playing Sheldon. I love the episode where he's sick - it is so funny!

I can only add this: You owe it to yourself to give this show a spin. You won't regret it.



Sheldon is my favorite too.  He's always saying and doing things that crack me up.  And I think the second season is just as good - there have been some classic Sheldon moments.  The way he knocks on Penny's door still makes me laugh.  I'm always laughing when I watch this show..so much that I can't safely snack or really drink anything either.  I almost choked on potato chips when I started laughing - at Sheldon again.   :hysterical:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on December 09, 2008, 01:34:22 PM
Oh great...yet another TV series I've got to buy now. :stars: I've got to stop reading these threads! :laugh:
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 09, 2008, 10:15:13 PM
Oh great...yet another TV series I've got to buy now. :stars: I've got to stop reading these threads! :laugh:

This one is so worth it though.

I was so ticked last night.  A new episode was scheduled for last night.  So I turn on CBS only to find that the CBS station I get had preemted the show to air some nonsense about digital television and how everything switches to digital in February.  This station has a history of doing this, though it is usually for something connected to Ohio States sports.  So...I was so ticked that I went to the station's website and send in an email - it took me like 5 minutes to find how to do it - and let them know that I was not happy. I figured that would be that and at least I vented to them.  I had a reply within the hour saying how the FCC requires all stations to air the informercial thing on the switch.  They looked at time slots and blah blah..basically they felt that doing it when The Big Bang Theory was on would be the least disruptive.  Then he told me that the show was airing at 2 am so I could record it.  I don't have a VCR or a DVR, so I wrote back and told him that.  Then he wrote back asking for my address, saying he is going to send me a DVD.  I don't know what DVD, but I sent back my address.  I'll take what he's sending.  And I think I'll write them again the next them they preempt a show for something.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 11, 2008, 03:08:11 AM
Just a quick update.  I got the DVD today.  It has Monday's new episode on it.  So that works for me. :)
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 15, 2008, 10:01:30 PM
Smallville: Season 6
 
Original Title: Smallville
Year: 2006
Country: United States
Director: 1. Zod
Rating: NR
Length: 917 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.7:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
They tried to be friends. But their chosen paths set them on a collision course. The CLARK KENT-LEX LUTHOR rivalry explodes into the fierce good-versus-evil battle fans have long expected in Season 6 of the spectacular series that reinterprets the characters and events of SUPERMAN mythology from its roots.

Adding to the rivalry: LANA LANG becomes Mrs. Luthor. Clark would be stunned to find out why she says 'yes'. But that’s not all that’s stunning. GREEN ARROW forms a SUPER HERO league. Will Clark join? PHANTOM ZONE escapees menace Earth. Can Clark stop them? LUTHORCORP expands its dark experiments. Will an awesome KRYPTONITE-powered army be the result? The answers - and thrills - are here!

My Thoughts
What a ride! I haven't felt this compelled to keep watching a TV series for a while (well, if you don't count the recently watch Big Bang Theory Season 1 hehe). Plenty of twists, Lana finally growing into an interesting character (not quite there yet, but it's improving). Jimmy Olsen enters Superman's World. Big reveals on some key characters. A big cliffhanger at the end of the season (although I hate those usually - except I already own S7 so it doesn't matter hehe). And of course, the episode "Justice" ;)

But I think what I like the most is that we're a bit past the whole «high school drama» feel of the previous seasons. It's still there at times, but it doesn't feel as forced as it used to.

Now, if only they would stop relying on Red Kryptonite to get CK with Lois. I know I know, it would break continuity with the Superman universe - but still, it's odd to see them interact and not really register.

It's a great season to a great show. 

Now.. on to Season 7!
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 31, 2008, 04:40:21 AM
Smallville: Season 7
 
Original Title: Smallville
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: 1. Bizarro
Rating: NR
Length: 830 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Portuguese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: Chinese, English, French, Korean, Portuguese, Spanish, Thai

What they say
There are two CLARK KENTs. One is the young man whose life in a tiny Kansas town sets him on destiny's path. The other is a BIZARRO show shares Clark's DNA but not his values. Only one of them can survive.

SUPERMAN mythology grows deeper and more powerful in an event-packed season that includes the arrival of Clark's cousin KARA/SUPERGIRL. Keep a low profile and master your powers, Clark says. Kara has other ideas. Plus: LANA LANG might prefer Bizarro to the real deal. LOIS LANE makes a career leap. CHLOE SULLIVAN finds that balancing a meteor power with a personal life isn't easy. And LEX LUTHOR's power-lust has a new fixation - Kara. New characters and complications. New secrets and lore. New thrills and special effects. Power up to Season 7!

My thoughts
Again, a good season for this show. A lot happens with the arrival of new characters. There's also the demise of a major character. Something really big happens at the end of the season. Unfortunately, they insist on developing the Lana/Clark relationship - even though we all know how that ends. We even get to see Clark with his ever sexy black-rim glasses!  :laugh:

All in all - a good season. Not the best, but they are taking the show in a somewhat new direction, and it's all good.


Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 31, 2008, 04:54:58 AM
Lost: The Complete Fourth Season
 
Original Title: Lost: The Complete Fourth Season
Year: 2008
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: TV-14
Length: 604 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Mono
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Immerse yourself in the boldest show on television with every mysterious twist and turn of LOST's addivtive Fourth Season. Exploding with excitement and never-before-seen extras, LOST reaches new heights on DVD.

More than three months after their fateful crash, the survivors of Oceanic Flight 815 will discover that the only thing more dangerous than the island might be the people who have come to rescue them.

Dive deep into this captivating 6-disc DVD box set, complete with original flashbacks, mind-bending flash-forwards and an astonishing world of exclusive bonus features. Experience one of the most groundbreaking shows in television history and "let LOST remind you of how spectacular scripted network programming can be," says USA Today.

My thoughts
And the plot thickens yet again. Boy the mysteries and twists just keep on coming. They even bring back stuff from Season 1 and create new mysteries around them!

So far, the story of Lost has been mostly told by mixing the current events with flashbacks to flesh out the characters and explain/solve some mysteries. They have a new device this season: flashforwards! And I love them! It's obvious that it's a new toy for the writers - they make EXTENSIVE use of them. But it's all good. I loved it.

Again, as usual, even though the season is relatively short - there are only 13 episodes (well, 14 if count the double length finale as 2) - there is still a lot going on and many more intertwining of story and mysteries that just keep on getting thicker and thicker.

And the season ends with a bang - and season 5 has just shot right up on my wishlist and will be bought first thing when it comes out. I can't wait to see how it all plays out and how every little bits and pieces fit together. Because characters you thought were "bad" are turning to be not so bad after all. And some who you thought as "good" - might not be as good as originally thought.

I'm really excited about it all. Since the show has already been confirmed for a total of 6 seasons - ending in May 2010 - it's a little sad to know it will all end then, but at the same time, that means the the production team can really map out all the events and conclude it in a way that will answer all questions.

I can't wait!


Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 31, 2008, 05:01:36 AM
Heroes: Season 2
 
Original Title: Heroes
Year: 2007
Country: United States
Director: 1. Four Months Later...
Rating: NR
Length: 481 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Rejoin the epic and suspenseful phenomenon as Heroes: Season 2 arrives on DVD! Experience all the new and exciting twists of the astonishing series in this 4-disc set that includes every gripping Season 2 episode. Plus, see what could have been with exclusive bonus features that reveal the untold stories that never aired and an alternate ending to the season finale, where the fate of humanity takes an ominous turn when Peter fails to catch the vial containing the deadly virus.

My Thoughts
Meh.

After a great first season, I thought season 2 was a disappointment. Don't get me wrong - it still entertains, but the magic of the first season is lost here. It doesn't help either that two major characters have lost all powers in one case, and forgot they even have them in the second. Most of the season, another of the heroes is doing whatever in the past. Another one is ordered by her father to not use her powers. And then, you have Veronica Mars on steroids appearing just like that, out of nowhere. I mean... What?

Yet, despite all that, the ending the pay off was nice. Matt gets a new power. The heroes end up facing each other (to a certain extent). And it ends with a very little sneak peek scene at Volume 3 that shows promise.

So I haven't given up hope on Heroes - I'm just disappointed that they created something great with Season 1 - and almost shot it to pieces with Season 2 (or Volume 2 - as it seems they like to call them). Let's hope they can get the whole thing back on track for Season 3 (Volume 3)

<-- because of the ending
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 31, 2008, 05:12:12 AM
Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog
 
Original Title: Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog
Year: 2008
Country: United States
Director: Joss Whedon
Rating: NR
Length: 42 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: Chinese, English, French, German, Japanese, Spanish

What they say
Neil Patrick Harris (How I Met Your Mother ) stars as Billy, A.K.A. Dr. HOrrible, a budding super-villain whose plans for world domination contiually go awry. His two goals: getting accepted into the Evil League of Evil, and working up the guts to speak to his laundromat crush Penny, played by Felicia Day (The Guild.) The only thing standing in his way is Captain Hammer, Billy's superhero arch-nemesis play by Nathan Fillion (Firefly ). With one big score, Billy could get into the E.L.E. and earn the respect of Penny, but only if he can keep her away from the dashing Captain Hammer...

My Thoughts
Dr. Horrible Sing-Along Blog: or how to pass time when you can't officially make money doing what you do - writing (this was produced during the writer's strike, for those who didn't know).

This is a labour of love - and it shows. And as opposed to when this "labour of love" moniker is applied to low quality stuff to give them a quality they may lack - in this case, it's different. You have a bunch of very talented people who gave it their all. It's only 42 minutes long. But it's 42 great minutes. From the first second to the last.

Neil Patrick Harris IS Dr. Horrible and he nails the role. He is marvelous as a misunderstood supervillain who is not entirely villainous.
Nathan Fillion also nails the part of Captain Hammer. The whole blown out of proportion ego. The "I'm better than you" attitude.
Even Felicia Day as Penny is great although unfortunately, she doesn't have a big part. Which kinda odd considering Joss Whedon wrote that.

But all this wouldn't work without good music (it's a musical after all) - and rest assured, the music is good. Joss and Jed deliver. The songs are catchy. Sarcastic when they need to be, funny and emotional. Neil, Nathan and Felicia did a good job delivering their songs.

This is a well invested 42 minutes. And like I said in another thread here: it seems to just get better with age.

And I have a plea to whoever could make it happen: SEQUEL!


Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 31, 2008, 08:29:54 AM
I read somewhere that a sequel isn't out of the question.  Whedon wasn't going to give any specifics, but evidently they are talking about it and coming up with ideas.  I hope that happens...I would so love to see more of this.

Oh..I also read that Whedon was thinking of doing new Firefly stuff and releasing it on the web like he did with this..and supposedly Nathan Fillion is willing to do it.  I would so love if that happened...I'd take more Firefly anyway I could get it.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: richierich on January 01, 2009, 04:58:17 PM
Lost: The Complete Fourth Season
 
Original Title: Lost: The Complete Fourth Season
Year: 2008
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: TV-14
Length: 604 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital Surround, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, English: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Mono
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Immerse yourself in the boldest show on television with every mysterious twist and turn of LOST's addivtive Fourth Season. Exploding with excitement and never-before-seen extras, LOST reaches new heights on DVD.

More than three months after their fateful crash, the survivors of Oceanic Flight 815 will discover that the only thing more dangerous than the island might be the people who have come to rescue them.

Dive deep into this captivating 6-disc DVD box set, complete with original flashbacks, mind-bending flash-forwards and an astonishing world of exclusive bonus features. Experience one of the most groundbreaking shows in television history and "let LOST remind you of how spectacular scripted network programming can be," says USA Today.

My thoughts
And the plot thickens yet again. Boy the mysteries and twists just keep on coming. They even bring back stuff from Season 1 and create new mysteries around them!

So far, the story of Lost has been mostly told by mixing the current events with flashbacks to flesh out the characters and explain/solve some mysteries. They have a new device this season: flashforwards! And I love them! It's obvious that it's a new toy for the writers - they make EXTENSIVE use of them. But it's all good. I loved it.

Again, as usual, even though the season is relatively short - there are only 13 episodes (well, 14 if count the double length finale as 2) - there is still a lot going on and many more intertwining of story and mysteries that just keep on getting thicker and thicker.

And the season ends with a bang - and season 5 has just shot right up on my wishlist and will be bought first thing when it comes out. I can't wait to see how it all plays out and how every little bits and pieces fit together. Because characters you thought were "bad" are turning to be not so bad after all. And some who you thought as "good" - might not be as good as originally thought.

I'm really excited about it all. Since the show has already been confirmed for a total of 6 seasons - ending in May 2010 - it's a little sad to know it will all end then, but at the same time, that means the the production team can really map out all the events and conclude it in a way that will answer all questions.

I can't wait!




Thganks for the good write-up, it's on my mantlepiece for viewing this weekend  :thanks:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on February 15, 2009, 06:08:16 PM
Battlestar Galactica: Season 4.0
 
Original Title: Battlestar Galactica: Season 4.0
Year: 2008
Country: United States
Director: Razor
Rating: 14A
Length: 437 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, Spanish

What they say
They've traveled millions of miles and defied relentless attackers, but nothing will prepare the human race for what lies ahead as Battlestar Galactica 4.0 arrives on DVD! In ten gripping episodes, relive each pivotal moment as the civil war amongst the Cylons escalates and the quest for Earth continues. Loaded with riveting bonus features, this 4-disc set includes the unrated, extended version fo Battlestar Galactica: Razor that never aired on television. Presented uninterrupted and in Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound, it's the epic phenomenon that critics call "a truly great show!" (Mary McNamara, Los Angeles Times)

My Thoughts
Galactica is back!

After a somewhat lacking season 3, it's good to see Galactica back, and in full force! Some big surprises packed in these 10 episodes. It ends on a somewhat bleak note, but then, it's Battlestar Galactica we're talking, what else can you expect? Hehe ;) Of course it's not over yet, season 4.5 is airing right now. And I can't wait to see where it's headed from here!

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 06, 2009, 10:52:33 PM
Well, I'll soon be starting a "Get Well Soon Marathon".

I'm under home administered intraveinous antobiotics for the next four days. So I'm stuck with a catheter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catheter) in my right hand, which means I won't be able to play Xbox for the next few days. I'm also off work at least until tuesday, and I have to minimize any movement, so I'll be stuck at the computer watching movies for a little while.

For those of you who care about that sort of things, what I have is a Cellulitis  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulitis)in my right leg.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on March 06, 2009, 10:59:29 PM
Just take it easy and enjoy some movies Sébastien!

Oh... and if you find yourself getting bored maybe you can manage doing the gallery site update.  ;) :P
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on March 06, 2009, 11:09:01 PM
I hope you get well soon!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on March 06, 2009, 11:38:10 PM
I'm sorry you aren't well and I hope you heal quickly. I agree with Pete, it's time to catch up on your unwatched pile!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 07, 2009, 12:23:15 AM
Oh... and if you find yourself getting bored maybe you can manage doing the gallery site update.  ;) :P

That's actually what I am working on right now! ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on March 07, 2009, 01:01:30 AM
Oh... and if you find yourself getting bored maybe you can manage doing the gallery site update.  ;) :P

That's actually what I am working on right now! ;)

 :yahoo: When done I will be sure to announce it at the other forum  :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 07, 2009, 02:50:22 AM
Well, I'll soon be starting a "Get Well Soon Marathon".
Maybe it's the time to watch the 3 movies that you have bought because of one of my order last year. At least they will make you feel good :devil:

Take your time to rest well and don't go play Guitar Hero. Just think that you have just got a long weekend, so relax in front of your computer and take care of yourself.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 07, 2009, 04:46:41 AM
Maybe it's the time to watch the 3 movies that you have bought because of one of my order last year. At least they will make you feel good :devil:

You know, that's actually a good suggestion! I've been somewhat scared of these 3 movies to be perfectly honest. But now, I can't say I don't have time.. I currently have all the time in the world! ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 07, 2009, 05:02:59 AM
Oh... and if you find yourself getting bored maybe you can manage doing the gallery site update.  ;) :P

That's actually what I am working on right now! ;)

 :yahoo: When done I will be sure to announce it at the other forum  :thumbup:

Oh shit! I can't remember the admin password  :bag:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on March 07, 2009, 05:28:11 AM
I hope you get better soon. 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 07, 2009, 05:48:20 AM
It's amazing how fast antibiotics can work. I've just taken the third dose, and the swelling is already less than it was (I have some liberty within my jeans, which I didn't have before going to the hospital). And it stopped hurting for the most part.

So treatment is going well! Still 3 days to go! ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on March 07, 2009, 06:43:26 AM
That's good that the antibiotics have started to work already.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 07, 2009, 08:23:31 AM
You know, that's actually a good suggestion! I've been somewhat scared of these 3 movies to be perfectly honest. But now, I can't say I don't have time.. I currently have all the time in the world! ;)
You are scared to look at some great looking nude women  :o :laugh:
Don't forget to let me know your impressions on those films after you had watched them. Not necessarely a review but at least if you have like them or not.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on March 07, 2009, 11:56:00 AM
You know, that's actually a good suggestion! I've been somewhat scared of these 3 movies to be perfectly honest. But now, I can't say I don't have time.. I currently have all the time in the world! ;)
You are scared to look at some great looking nude women  :o :laugh:

Jimmy, he's only just getting rid of one swelling in his jeans. He doesn't need another... :devil:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 07, 2009, 01:42:33 PM
You know, that's actually a good suggestion! I've been somewhat scared of these 3 movies to be perfectly honest. But now, I can't say I don't have time.. I currently have all the time in the world! ;)
You are scared to look at some great looking nude women  :o :laugh:

Jimmy, he's only just getting rid of one swelling in his jeans. He doesn't need another... :devil:

 :hysterical: :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 07, 2009, 03:34:21 PM
It seems cellulitis is not what I thought it is... (will have to follow that link...)


Good to hear you are already getting better over there!

No XBOX for few days seems hard... WRY(not)P these days? I am currently on trophy achievement hunt in GTA IV and play a bit Killzone 2 (less than I "should").
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on March 07, 2009, 04:17:02 PM
It seems cellulitis is not what I thought it is... (will have to follow that link...)
What you mean is cellulite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulite).

It's like silicone and silicon - not the same thing. ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 07, 2009, 10:04:59 PM
It seems cellulitis is not what I thought it is... (will have to follow that link...)
What you mean is cellulite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulite).

It's like silicone and silicon - not the same thing. ;)

It's even worse in french.. Both condition have the exact same word: Cellulite
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 07, 2009, 10:12:03 PM
In German, the colloquial term for Cellulite is Zellulitis, even though the medical correct term is Cellulite.
So also in German, both conditions are usually referred to by the same word: Zellulitis
This is why Achim confused it here, as did I.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 08, 2009, 01:53:07 AM
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
 
Original Title: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Year: 2008
Country: United States
Director:
Rating: PG
Length: 122 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
'STEVEN SPIELBERG' and 'GEORGE LUCAS' bring you the greatest adventurer of all time in a film packed with "sensational, awe-inspiring spectacles" (Roger Ebert, 'CHICAGO SUN-TIMES'). 'Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull' finds Indy (Harrison Ford) trying to outrace a brilliant and beautiful agent (Cate Blanchett) for the mystical, all-powerful Crystal Skull of Akator in a quest that is filled with "spectacular fun" (Claudia Puig, 'USA TODAY'). Teaming up with a rebellious young biker (Shia LaBeouf) and his spirited original love Marion (Karen Allen), Indy takes you on an action-packed adventure in the exciting tradition of the classic 'Indiana Jones' movies!

My Thoughts
Indy's back! That's all I can think of after seeing the movie. It's all there: the impossible situations where Indy gets out with an ever more improbable solution, the bar fights, the car chases, the mythos surrounding it all. This is a fine Indiana Jones. It's got really beautiful set pieces. Some great tongue in cheek humour (even acknowledging Indy age!), the one-liners are there too.

There's iconic images that stick to my mind after seeing this movie.

I love the Indy reveal at the beginning, where the camera points to his shadow and he puts on his hat and takes his iconic pose with the Indy March lightly creeping into the music.

I also love, for some reason, the image of Indy looking towards the mushroom cloud of the nuclear test bomb.

I loved Cate Blanchett in the role. There's a closeup shot of her face holding a sword to Indy's throat that I can't get enough of. Her's blue eyes contrasting with her dark hair gets to me every time (same reason I love Rena Sofer so much. I don't why, but I have a thing for women with light blue eyes but dark hair. Even if it's not their natural color).

This fourth Indy accomplishes very well what it set out to do: Give a popcorn flick - Indy style!


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 08, 2009, 01:59:54 AM
run fatboy run
 
Original Title: run fatboy run
Year: 2008
Country: United Kingdom
Director: David Schwimmer
Rating: 14A
Length: 100 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.40:1, Pan & Scan 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital Surround, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French

What they say
It's the London Marathon, and thousands of feet pound along the Thames Embankment. Two of those feet belong to out-of-shape, out-of-luck Dennis Doyle. He's running to gain the respect (and hopefully, the love) of Libby, the girl he left pregnant and heartbroken at the altar five years earlier. And running alongside Dennis is Libby's handsome, successful, self-confident and 'very' fit new boyfriend. Simon Pegg ('Hot Fuzz'), Thandie Newton ('Crash') and Hank Azaria ('The Simpsons') star in a runaway laughfest from debuting director David Schwimmer ('Friends'). Can Dennis win back what he lost by lacing up some hi-tech footwear? One thing's for sure: He's putting his heart and soles into the attempt.

My Thoughts
I found the movie enjoyable. I did laugh at a few gags. But the story is so improbable and, at times, it feels forced. It's an entertaining watch, but they drag on a bit, especially at the end. Without revealing too much, let's just say that there's not much chance of the resolution to this movie actually happening in real life, and in a sense, that works against it. Not that I expect realism at every corner in a movie, but some sense of logic is needed sometimes. Running a 26 miles marathon is no easy feat. So, for an average guy to actually complete, in the condition he's in at the end? Didn't work for me.

But, if you are willing to leave out some logic and turn parts of your brain off while watching, what's there is a good heartfelt, feel good, almost romantic comedy. It's clichéd, it's predictable, highly so even, but it's still enjoyable. Just don't expect anything too fancy.

Also, the movie may star Simon Pegg, but it's nowhere near the same league as Shaun of the Dead or Hot Fuzz!. Thandie Newton's hotness does lift up the movie though  :laugh:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 08, 2009, 04:09:59 AM
The Seduction of Misty Mundae
 
Original Title: The Seduction of Misty Mundae
Year: 2005
Country: United States
Director: Michael Raso
Rating: NR
Length: 83 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:

What they say
Shy 18-year-old Misty (Misty Mundae) is staying with her aunt Inga (Julian Wells) for a week in the country. Naïve and innocent, yet on the verge of sexual discovery, Misty wants to learn all she can from her seductive aunt about the desires that have begun to stir within her. Misty loses her virginity to the teenage boy next door, and it whets her appetite for further sensual adventures. So when she discovers that Inga prefers the company of beautiful young women, it unleashes Misty's deepest yearnings to see and experience each and very pleasure that lies at her fingertips. How far will Misty go…and with whom?

My Thoughts
Well, I did it. I, finally, watched one of the movies I ordered after our resident unorthodox movie fan, Jimmy.

So, did I like it? Well yeah! It was actually much better than I expected. Yet, I can't say I really knew what I was getting into. Sure, after ordering, I did look around to try and figure out what it's all about, but I was still surprised.

I just read Jimmy's review of the film (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,695.msg72844.html#msg72844) (I probably should've written my own, before reading his, but oh well), and I must say, I agree with all he said. The two leads, Misty Mundae and Julian Wells, are perfect in their respective role, and I must give mucho kudos to Misty Mundae. She manages to make you actually believe that she is all innocent at the beginning of the movie. Some of the faces she makes as she sees her aunt "perform" for the "first time" in her life are priceless. And I must admit, Misty Mundae is cute as a button. I also like the fact that all the girls in the movie, look like girls you could meet anywhere. They look great, yet not too "artificial". Kudos for that.

I'll admit though, this is not entirely my cup of tea. I liked the movie, it was enjoyable, but it's not something I'd watch regularly. It may be the "first time" factor, and the fact that I'm not used to these type of movies. It may be a type of movie that grows on you, that you like more and more with time. At this point, I don't know. All I know is while I did enjoy the movie, and I'm still curious to see more, it may take a little while for me to dive in again with the other two I bought (Sinful & Chantal).

First contact has been established - let's see where it leads me ;)

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 08, 2009, 05:31:46 AM
Glad that you had appreciated it. I was surprise too when I've watched it, normally the production of this label aren't really good. This is based on a Joe Sarno's movie and I'm a fan of him, so it's not that surprising that I had liked it (it's even in my top 25). Usually erotic movie are boring, honestly I've enough movies to watch the real stuff. But, I can always appreciate a nice story when I see one and this film is one of those.

Don't expect the same for the 2 others. Chantal is the best movie of Misty Mundae but the mood is more dark and depressing. Sinfull is a very confusing "horror" movie but a good one. At least you don't have "Lust for Dracula" that is a real weird one where everyone is a woman from Dracula to Jonathan Harker.
 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 08, 2009, 05:45:03 AM
At least you don't have "Lust for Dracula" that is a real weird one where everyone is a woman from Dracula to Jonathan Harker.

Well.. I had it. Acquired from "questionable" sources. Then I needed to free up some space, so I had to delete it.

Usually erotic movie are boring, honestly I've enough movies to watch the real stuff. But, I can always appreciate a nice story when I see one and this film is one of those.

I think that's what threw me off a bit. I didn't expect it to be that much erotic, and the problem I think I have with it, is that it's painfully obviously that they're faking it, especially both scenes with Billy (Mario Duchi). But at the same time, the sex scenes do serve the movie and further the story, and they are played well and realistically. It's really odd.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 08, 2009, 05:50:33 AM
No XBOX for few days seems hard...

Yeah, it's hard. I was on a roll on Lost Odyssey, collecting the dreams, seeds, slot seeds and doing the treasure hunt before going further with the story. I'm at disc 4 of 4 and I was quite enjoying it. I just hope I still feel like playing it when I get that catheter out of my hand - that I won't jump to another game. I really want to start finishing games before moving to another one. I have too many unfinished games: Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Mass Effect, Assassin's Creed, Halo 3, Fallout 3, Fable II, Star Ocean: The Last Hope, GTA IV.... I really need to start finishing those...

You know there's a problem when Part 2 of a game is about to come out, and you've yet to finish Part 1 (Mass Effect). So you have to avoid announcement trailers and reading about the game, in case it spoils something for the first part  :-\

WRY(not)P these days?

 ??? ???
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on March 08, 2009, 08:35:16 AM
WRY(not)P these days?

 ??? ???
Never read the abbreveation, but I assume: What are you (not) playing these days. But IMHO it has to be WRU(not)P, like in "2 Fast 4 U?"
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 08, 2009, 10:16:00 AM
 :-[ Well, yes, it should have been WRUP and means exactly what Karsten said. Bloody ol' typo on my part.


Sorry for getting back on the health issue. Just wanted to say that the link you gave actually went to the "disease" I was thinking of ("orange peel skin") whereas I have actually never heard of the other cellulitis...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 08, 2009, 11:55:29 AM
I have too many unfinished games: Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Mass Effect, Assassin's Creed, Halo 3, Fallout 3, Fable II, Star Ocean: The Last Hope, GTA IV.... I really need to start finishing those...
I am kind of glad to see I am not the only one with such issues...

Among others (just what pops into my head) I have unfinished: Bioshock, Tomb Raider Underworld, Naruto Ultimate Ninja Storm, Fallout 3, Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, The Orange Box, Call of Duty 4 & 5. And then I should still do some extra playing in some finished ones to collect those trophies... Well, at least I just decided not to add Resident Evil 5 to that list...

Quote
You know there's a problem when Part 2 of a game is about to come out, and you've yet to finish Part 1 (Mass Effect).
I thought that's not supposed to be released until late this year? The recent trailer was merely a teaser...? But then, seeing the pile of unfinished games, it's not really about the time but quantity...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on March 08, 2009, 12:35:41 PM
:-[ Well, yes, it should have been WRUP and means exactly what Karsten said. Bloody ol' typo on my part.

Achim, you do know you're apologising for abbreviating the word "You" for a "Y", don't you? I mean, that's how it's spelt. :whistle: Shush! Before the illiterate Internet hears U...  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 08, 2009, 01:21:14 PM
Quote
You know there's a problem when Part 2 of a game is about to come out, and you've yet to finish Part 1 (Mass Effect).
I thought that's not supposed to be released until late this year? The recent trailer was merely a teaser...? But then, seeing the pile of unfinished games, it's not really about the time but quantity...

It is merely a teaser, but reveals an important development from the ending of Part 1...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 09, 2009, 01:37:18 AM
Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: The Complete First Season
 
Original Title: Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: The Complete First Season
Year: 2008
Country: United States
Director: 1. Pilot
Rating: NR
Length: 392 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Portuguese: Dolby Digital Surround
Subtitles: Chinese, English, Korean, Spanish, Thai, Other

What they say
The mother of all destiny. Her son, the future leader of mankind. Their protector, a Terminator from the future. Together they must take back the future as Sarah Connor (300's Lena Headey) prepares her son to fight the war against machines determined to annihilate the human race. The Clock is ticking. Can they stop Judgement Day?

My Thoughts
That was great! I loved it! I love the characterization of Sarah, John and Cameron - especially Cameron.

I can't judge the series in relation to the movies, simply because I'm a bit fuzzy as to the actual story of the movies, but nothing really jumped in my face as being completely out of whack with the known canon.

What I can tell, is that I loved the series. Lots of action, good characterization, some great "Terminator" moment. I can't wait for S2!

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 09, 2009, 01:46:42 AM
The Dark Knight: Steelbook Edition
 
Original Title: The Dark Knight: Steelbook Edition
Year: 2008
Country: Canada
Director: Christopher Nolan
Rating: PG
Length: 152 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Spanish: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
The follow-up to Batman Begins, The Dark Knight reunites director Christopher Nolan and star Christian Bale, who reprises the role of Batman/Bruce Wayne in his continuing war on crime. With the help of Lt. Jim Gordon and District Attorney Harvey Dent, Batman set out to destroy organized crime in Gotham for good. The triumvirate proves effective. But soon the three find themselves prey to a rising criminal mastermind known as The Joker, who thrusts Gotham into anarchy and forces Batman closer to crossing the fine line between hero and vigilante. Heath Ledger stars as archvillain The Joker, and Aaron Eckhart plays Dent. Maggie Gyllenhaal joins the cast as Rachel Dawes. Returning From Batman Begins are Gary Oldman as Gordon, Michael Caine as Alfred and Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox.

My Thoughts
I'll be very original with my review of this movie.

It definitely deserves all the praise it gets. Heath Ledger as the Joker is M-A-R-V-E-L-O-U-S! Completely deserving of his Oscar. He completely steals the show for me, and that's saying something, because he's against Bale, Freeman, Oldman and Caine - which all give good performances in their respective role. But Ledger brings this little something extra to the Joker character.

I really like the the whole Batman reboot that started with Batman Begins. I like that real, gritty, almost real life feel there is to the new Batman. It's not all shiny and heroic. Even the heroes show some flaws, but will still make the right choice in the end.

Great movie, from beginning to end. Great actor performances. Great mood and atmosphere. Loved it!

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 09, 2009, 04:57:11 AM
Awww crap!

Back to the clinic for me.. The catheter is broken. I tried injecting tonight, and it wouldn't go in, and it hurts. So I called the emergency line, they told me to take my emergency oral dose (a capsule) and to go to the clinic first thing tomorrow morning.

Arghh! To think I only have 5 doses left.... Couldn't that crappy thing held until then? grrrrr!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 09, 2009, 12:13:53 PM
Achim, you do know you're apologising for abbreviating the word "You" for a "Y", don't you? I mean, that's how it's spelt. :whistle: Shush! Before the illiterate Internet hears U...  :tease:
*simply agrees in lack of a witty response*

Actually, I didn't think about it too much :-[ It's WRUP, but maybe I inserted the Y trying subconsciously to do it right :shrug:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on March 09, 2009, 12:24:11 PM
Achim, you do know you're apologising for abbreviating the word "You" for a "Y", don't you? I mean, that's how it's spelt. :whistle: Shush! Before the illiterate Internet hears U...  :tease:
*simply agrees in lack of a witty response*

You could ask why he has a problem with the U but not the R. ;) ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 09, 2009, 12:31:22 PM
You could ask why he has a problem with the U but not the R. ;) ;D
:slaphead: :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 09, 2009, 02:36:54 PM
I'm currently watching La Job. A Quebec remake of Ricky Gervais' The Office.

While I like that they stay true to the original, down to the actual story, tone and presentation, they may actually be TOO faithful, to the point where it is entirely predictable to someone who saw The Office. And I must say, the casting is not all that great. The guy playing the manager just can't get anywhere near Ricky Gervais' wonderful delivery as that same manager.

I fear watching this Quebec-made version will just make me want to watch the actual thing!

But I'll admit, it's great for those of us here in Quebec who can't understand English, or won't even try to watch a series in its original language.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 09, 2009, 05:50:39 PM
I like the German remake of The Office, called "Stromberg". Even though most characters can be recognized as rip-offs of the original The Office, the boss (the title giving Bernd Stromberg) is a fun new take on the character.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on March 09, 2009, 07:39:09 PM
Achim, you do know you're apologising for abbreviating the word "You" for a "Y", don't you? I mean, that's how it's spelt. :whistle: Shush! Before the illiterate Internet hears U...  :tease:
*simply agrees in lack of a witty response*

You could ask why he has a problem with the U but not the R. ;) ;D

Baby steps, Karsten. I'm defending the Queen's English, one letter at a time!  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on March 09, 2009, 08:52:17 PM
Baby steps, Karsten. I'm defending the Queen's English, one letter at a time!  :laugh:

Then start with "Z" and tell those ignorant Americans that it is a "Zed" and not a "Zee" ;) ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 10, 2009, 05:15:05 AM
But as Bruce Willis once said: Zed's dead, baby. Zed's dead.

 :devil:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 11, 2009, 04:44:33 AM
La Job
 
Original Title: La Job
Year: 2006
Country: Canada (Quebec)
Director: André Saint-Pierre
Rating: 13+
Length: 360 Min.
Video: Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: French: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles:

What they say (Google automatic translation)
The world of work now has its own cult!

Who has never suffered the wrath of a careerist or the zealous fed an employee by the stiff routine? On the extreme realism, this TV will not leave one indifferent! Follow the characters both pathetic and endearing, which is the small team of Papiers Jennings Papers. With its acid and caustic humor, 'The Job' you will love to hate life office.

My Thoughts
This is an extremely faithful remake of Ricky Gervais' The Office (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0290978/). It may actually have been a little too faithful, and not adapted enough for Quebec's "sensibilities".

The casting is fine, I don't think the actors are the problem. I think it stems from the writers. They have watched the original too much. They kept the exact same themes, pretty much the exact same jokes, and of course the same tone.

So it's fine, but what's the point? The original is so tight and great, why remake the exact same thing? In a sense, I'm happy they redid it, instead of just dubbing the original. But then, the remake is so verbatim, it's useless. It's kind of like the same situation as Psycho.

So I can recommend it to someone who really can't understand english - but please, do yourself a favor, and get the original if you do understand english.



(that rating is harsh, but it is how I feel after watching this remake. There's a good, very positive point to all this though. It made me start to watch Extras! ;))
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 11, 2009, 04:50:06 AM
Little update on my situation (for those of you who'd like to know):

I went today for the followup visit to the doctor. The infection is healing nicely. The antibiotics are doing their job. The catheter is out of my arm (well, not really. I'm removing it tonight. Yes, I'm doing this myself. The doctor how, but then, how hard can it be? hehe), and I'm completing the treatment on oral antibiotics (capsules).

The swelling is way down, but there's still a little. But then, I regularly had swollen legs even before getting this cellulitis. I'm actually going to have to see another specialist about these lower limbs oedema.

The pain is all gone though, which is great news. The bad side of this, is I'm going back to work tomorrow. I had a great time just laying in bed, leg risen, watching movies (and sleeping too!)  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 11, 2009, 05:27:40 AM
Thanks for the update. I am pleased to see that you are getting better without complications.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 11, 2009, 08:45:29 AM
Good to know that everything goes without any complication. Take it easy for the first days at your job since you're always on medication.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 04:13:09 AM
I'm about to post a new review, but before I do, I just want to say I'm terribly sorry about making the site so slow to load. It would seem that a CPU failure has occured on the server I'm on at my hosting company (Site5, I'm hosted on Poseidon).

Terribly sorry about that. But they are usually pretty quick in fixing problems, so it should be back up soon (I hope...)


Forget about that, looks like it's already back online! Told you they were quick ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 04:46:15 AM
Extras: The Whole Series



Original Title: Extras
Year: 2005
Country: United Kingdom
Written & Directed by:Ricky Gervais & Stephen Merchant
Length: 12x30 min. + 86 min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, French, Spanish

What they say
Meet Andy Millman, Actor. Never forgets his lines because he never gets any.

Andy (Ricky Gervais) is a desperate man. He's been an actor for five years but thanks to his useless agent (Stephen Merchant), he's never done any real acting. Instead, he's a lowly film extra, making his mark in the background while the stars do their work. His partner in arms is the pitiable Maggie, a fellow extra and a hopeless romantic.

Andy may be an extra, but he's a star in his own right.

Too bad nobody else agrees.

EPISODES:
Series 1Series 2
1. Kate Winslet
2. Ben Stiller
3. Ross Kemp
4. Samuel L. Jackson   
5. Les Dennis
6. Patrick Stewart
1. Orlando Bloom
2. David Bowie
3. Daniel Radcliffe
4. Chris Martin
5. Ian McKellen
6. ? ? ? ? ? ?
& Series Finale Special

My Thoughts
I first noticed Ricky Gervais in an episode of Alias (Season 3 - Facade). He played a bomb specialist. And for some reason, his performance struck and I already liked him.

Fast forward some time, and I was shopping for some DVD to watch while I was stuck at work on a December 22nd. I stumbled upon The Office. I recognized Ricky Gervais, read the synopsis, sounded interesting, so I bought it.

Turned out to probably be one of the best blind buy I ever did. I've been a fan of Ricky's ever since.

So of course, watching the well done, but underwhelming, Quebec remake of The Office made me want to watch some proper Ricky Gervais. And since I had just watched "La Job", what better option did I have than "Extras"? ;)

Right off the bat, Extras is very different from The Office. It's filmed as a proper sit-com, whereas The Office is set up as a mockumentary. But the differences don't just end there. Extras is, in a sense, much more serious than The Office, and yet, it's crazier. It's actually quite interesting how the tone for Extras is much more serious, and yet, the joke scenes are actually edgier than they were in The Office.

Extras is the story of the rise of Andy Millman. It is presented as a sit-com, and definitely has all the elements, but I can't help but feel that it is at the same time a drama. The whole series is far from being all fun and games. There are some genuine tender moments, as well as over the top comedy. There is an actual message and a serious undertone to it all, and I love the whole series all the more for it.

The final monologue by Andy Millman on celebrity at the end of the series finale special is brilliant, and sums up the whole point of the series. And it's funny, because while the monologue itself is actual quite funny, the whole message and how he delivers it is actual deep and meaningful. As a climax the series, it's great! A lot of emotions there, which I'm not used to in so-called "comedy" shows, but it works, and it's great.

Now the stars. It's actually funny, because while there are big names among the guest stars, the series stays focused on Andy (and Maggie actually, his best friend). The stars never overpower the story. The whole series is a character piece with great character development of Andy Millman. The guest stars, while they do have great lines and are hilarious in how they are portrayed, often as the opposite of the image they project, they do not take center stage, and are there to give an air of realism to the whole side of Andy being an extra on movies. In a sense, the stars are there to bring the actual comedy to the show, while the main actors (Ricky Gervais and Ashley Jensen mostly) do the more serious stuff.

I loved the show. Give it a shot. It's also 12 episodes plus a special, but I had a great time watching it.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 17, 2009, 05:25:00 AM
I'll give Extras :thumbup:

It was laugh out loud funny to me and I occasionally had to pause it so I could catch my breath. I thought it was great how the guest stars made fun of themselves (most of them anyway, some stayed on the serious side of things, like Robert De Niro and David Bowie). Daniel Radcliffe playing with an unpacked (but  don't worry, it's unused...) condom and the seeing Dame Diana Rigg with it in her hair is a sight to behold.

The story arc over the two series and the special is great, although Andy's "status" kind of changes between the series, we don't get to witness his climb/fall.

"Is he having a laugh?"
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 05:48:38 AM
Well one thing's for sure, I was missing some cultural references. Some of the stars in the show, I had never even seen! But yeah, I love how they all make fun of themselves, especially Orlando Bloom being convinced that his good looks alone is enough to attract women. That the fact he's famous doesn't have anything to do with it!  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on March 17, 2009, 02:28:00 PM
If you like Gervais, you'd appreciate how he handles charity stuff. See if it's on YouTube; I'm at work and can't check properly.

For Comic Relief last Friday there was a sketch where someone wanted to do an Opera version of The Office and went to see Ricky for his blessing. Ricky sits in his office, gnawing at a whole chicken and keeps quoting examples of his success and takes the piss out of celebrity charity fundraising!

And for Children in Need last year (I think) he filmed an African sequence. Except unlike other celebrities, he didn't actually go, he just filmed it on a green screen! :laugh:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 04:41:12 PM
Dead Poets Society
 
Original Title: Dead Poets Society
Year: 1989
Country: United States
Director: Peter Weir
Rating: PG
Length: 129 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, French: Dolby Digital 5.1, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
In an age defined by crew cuts, sport coats and cheerless conformity, he not only broke the mold... he reinvented it. Academy Award® winner Robin Williams (Best Supporting Actor, 'Good Will Hunting', 1997) delivers an extraordinary performance in one of the most compelling motion pictures of all time.

Williams stars as English professor John Keating, a passionate iconoclast who changes his students' lives forever when he challenges them to live life to the fullest and "Carpe Diem" - seize the day! Keating's unconventional approach meets with irrepressible enthusiasm from his students, but the faculty at staid, exclusive Welton Academy prep school is, to put it mildly, not amused. Featuring a star-making performance by Ethan Hawke and over three hours of never-before-seen bonus material this Special Edition of 'Dead Poets Society' will captivate and inspire you again and again.

My Thoughts
I found this to be a marvelous film, and very inspirational. Robin Williams here is delightful in the role of the quirky professor at a very strict school. The scene where he gets Ethan Hawke's character to overcome his inhibition and compose a poem right there in front of the class just blew me away. The whole cast actually is very efficient in bringing the theme of the movie accross.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 04:42:33 PM
Jimmy, this Dead Poets Society review above is just a split away from my previous Good Morning Vietnam / Dead Poets Society review. You might want to update the link in your list.

It was bothering me that they were in the same post, and they now just showed up on the front page, so I decided to split them into 2 separate posts.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 17, 2009, 05:24:12 PM
If you like Gervais, you'd appreciate how he handles charity stuff. See if it's on YouTube; I'm at work and can't check properly.

For Comic Relief last Friday there was a sketch where someone wanted to do an Opera version of The Office and went to see Ricky for his blessing. Ricky sits in his office, gnawing at a whole chicken and keeps quoting examples of his success and takes the piss out of celebrity charity fundraising!

And for Children in Need last year (I think) he filmed an African sequence. Except unlike other celebrities, he didn't actually go, he just filmed it on a green screen! :laugh:
There is also a bit of a great charity routine of his in Grand Theft Auto IV!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 05:40:11 PM
There is also a bit of a great charity routine of his in Grand Theft Auto IV!

Hehe Yeah, I keep going to that comedy club in GTAIV hoping to see Ricky. But the game seems to prefer Kat Williams for some reason  :thumbdown:

Not that he's bad, but I much prefer Ricky!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W85DkdydHmU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUP5tFKj2Uc
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 17, 2009, 06:28:55 PM
The guest stars, while they do have great lines and are hilarious in how they are portrayed, often as the opposite of the image they project, they do not take center stage, and are there to give an air of realism to the whole side of Andy being an extra on movies.

One of my favorite scenes in the series is Ian McKellen telling his acting secrets to Andy  :laugh:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43sbtkQM6zc
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 17, 2009, 06:36:27 PM
Jimmy, this Dead Poets Society review above is just a split away from my previous Good Morning Vietnam / Dead Poets Society review. You might want to update the link in your list.
Ask and it will be done :laugh:

I've just change the previous link in the database with this one.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 17, 2009, 08:00:20 PM
One of my favorite scenes in the series is Ian McKellen telling his acting secrets to Andy  :laugh:

Yeah, love that scene. Actually, that whole episode is probably my favourite!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on March 17, 2009, 09:02:11 PM
This is the Comic Relief clip I mentioned. Ends with a great scene with Louis Walsh! He's Westlife's manager and is well known in his own right as a judge on X-Factor.

Gervais Comic Relief (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DO-8S57Rxmc)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 17, 2009, 09:54:13 PM
Was Ricky Gervais' Microsoft clip posted here in this forum at some point? It's also great.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on March 18, 2009, 05:15:53 AM
Hehe Yeah, I keep going to that comedy club in GTAIV hoping to see Ricky. But the game seems to prefer Kat Williams for some reason  :thumbdown:
When I played it it would start with Kat and go through all of his bits. Then Ricky came up and each time I went I'd see another bit of his. Then it went back to repeat Kat. I think there is about 4(?) of each.


Was Ricky Gervais' Microsoft clip posted here in this forum at some point? It's also great.
No. Should I search YouTube or you have a link readily available?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on March 18, 2009, 11:45:11 PM
Was Ricky Gervais' Microsoft clip posted here in this forum at some point? It's also great.
No. Should I search YouTube or you have a link readily available?

This video was produced as an internal introduction video for new employees at Microsoft, and was leaked to the internet. It was pulled from YouTube at the time (but found a home at other video sharing sites). But now it's back on YouTube also.

Due to its length it's divided into four parts:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKyV-l8i5lg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKXz2qDTiBU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEOz7nxky6Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXdKMoFqHWA


Sorry Sébastien for spamming your thread.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 18, 2009, 11:57:16 PM
Sorry Sébastien for spamming your thread.

Yeah, you should be careful. The anonymous moderators will come down and unleash their wrath on this off topic discussion!  :voodoo:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 19, 2009, 12:01:01 AM
The anonymous moderators will come down and unleash their wrath on this off topic discussion!  :voodoo:
:yellowcard: You aren't invisible, you have a set of blue stars under your name :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 23, 2009, 01:09:31 PM
Spaced: Complete Series
 
Original Title: Spaced
Year: 1999
Country: United Kingdom
Director: 1.1. Beginnings
Rating: 15
Length: 345 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English, Trivia

What they say
THE COMPLETE FIRST AND SECOND SERIES OF THE MULTI AWARD-WINNING SITUATION COMEDY SPACED

Spaced revolves around two idle twentysomething flatmates - immature skateboarding would-be comic artist Tim (Simon Pegg), and moody, responsibility-sh writer Daisy (Jessica Stevenson), and their self-induced lack of success in employment, relationships and life in general. Together with their oddball assortment of friends and neigbours: Marsha, Brian, Mike and Twist, they exist in a world perched precariously on the edge of normality.

My Thoughts
I finally watched Spaced. And you know what? I definitely should have joined the marathon Achim, Jon & Tom did back then. Both series are very good!

I love the mix of seriousness vs all-out comedy that happens in British sitcoms (at least, in the ones I've seen so far). I think it's something that is missing in most sitcoms this side of the pond.

I don't want to rehash what has been said here (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,486.0.html), so I'l say that I fully agree with most of what was said in that thread.

Highlights for me:

There are plenty of good moments, both funny and touching. The series as a whole is a great watch. You can't go wrong.


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 26, 2009, 05:23:09 AM
Divergence Eve: 1.Welcome to Watcher's Nest
 
Original Title: Divergence Eve: 1.Welcome to Watcher's Nest
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroshi Negishi
Rating: NR
Length: 120 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
In the 24th century, intergalactic space travel has become a reality. One of the first outposts in the far reaches of space is WATCHER'S NEST - an inflation hole drive portal - which has recently come under attack by a mysterious force known simply as GHOUL.... A group of young female cadets assigned to the portal are unexpectedly thrown into a hornet's nest of trouble as they finalize their training to become elite pilots in the Seraphim Squadron.

Episode 1: MISSION 2
Episode 2: Quantum Barrier
Episode 3: Necromancer
Episode 4: Specular
Episode 5: Seraphim

My Thoughts
Well, they certainly don't waste time explaining what's going on! Right from episode 1, you are thrown right into the main character's (Misaki Kureha) second mission. Nothing much is explained. They are fighting some unknown enemy and the episode ends on a big explosion with fate unknown to some other characters. Second episode? Jumps backward a few months and we are back at the beginning of training for the 4 main girls.

So far, the series is good. Not knowing what is really going on, and learning it as the girls do, gives the series an air of mystery, which I like. It's still early in the series, but some plot threads are being laid out, and I'm eager to see their resolution. Something really odd is going on with Misaki ;)

One thing I have to mention, for anyone who may be interested in the series. Make sure you like Fan Service. There's a LOT of it. Huge, extra bouncy breasts, tight skimpy outfits, cramped mecha cockpit allowing for revealing angle shots, etc. There's even full frontal nudity right in episode 2! Personally, I don't mind fan service, but I know some anime fans hate it.

So far, Divergence Eve doesn't look like it will revolutionize my view of anime, but, it is turning out to be good entertainment, and the story looks like it'll develop into something interesting.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 31, 2009, 04:01:50 PM
Divergence Eve & Misaki Chronicles



Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroshi Negishi
Rating: NR
Length: 120 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
In the 24th century, intergalactic space travel has become a reality. One of the first outposts in the far reaches of space is WATCHER'S NEST - an inflation hole drive portal - which has recently come under attack by a mysterious force known simply as GHOUL.... A group of young female cadets assigned to the portal are unexpectedly thrown into a hornet's nest of trouble as they finalize their training to become elite pilots in the Seraphim Squadron.

My Thoughts
I decided to review both series as one for a very simple reason. While Misaki Chronicles is a sequel, it picks up right from the end of Divergence Eve and continues the story. Hence I decided to treat it as a 26 episodes long series, instead of 2 series of 13 episodes each.

The story is told in a very puzzling way, playing with time, mixing the past with flashbacks and the present. It does work, in the end, you know what happened and what led to the events depicted. But it is very puzzling and it takes a while to actually start understanding what's going on. But once you do understand and have some back story to the whole, a lot of little scenes take a new meaning and the series as a whole becomes more interesting.

Divergence Eve mainly deals with Misaki's training as part of the Seraphim Squad. You know, right from the start, that there's something about her, because she shouldn't be there. She's scared of firing a gun, can't keep control of her Rampart Armor (a sort of Mecha), yet Seraphim is an elite squad assembled to fight the Ghouls (uberpowerful enemies). Of course, you find out what's so special about her, and she saves the day ... or does she?

Misaki Chronicles, oddly, doesn't center around Misaki at all. Well it does, because it deals with the aftermath of Divergence Eve, the main character here becomes Lyar von Ertiana (Seraphim's commander) as she investigates to understand what's going on. I won't say too much, just in case, but let's just say that the situation is a mess, and Ertiana, along with what's left of Seraphim, has to figure out what's going on.

There's one thing they did that I don't understand and that annoyed me, because I don't like the look of it. They used CGI for all the space sequence, the Rampart armors and the Ghouls. Now, the CGI wouldn't be so bad if it was better integrated (à la Futurama). The thing is, anything that is CGI in the show is rendered as the same look as shows like Transformers: Beast Wars (which was first released 6 years prior!) It clashes again the traditional anime stuff, and makes it stick out, and I don't like that. I don't mind CGI, but keep a consistent look. Make is cell shaded or something. Don't make half-realistic / half-cartoony textures on the CGI against traditional Anime. At times, well, most of the time actually, it looks like the Rampart armor are made of plastics, the Ghouls too. And the movement? Gosh! They can get such smooth movement for the hand drawn anime, they could've at least tried and made it a little less mechanical and rigid in the CGI animation sequence. But then, the series was released in 2002 (its original run in Japan), and they were on an Anime budget (which I've no idea how much it is, but I'm guessing it's somewhat less than they had for Gollum ;)) so they may not have had the money to generate better looking CGI.

I enjoyed the series. There are some great moments. Nothing earth shattering (although they do shatter a planet! haha) but it's a good entertainment series. A little confusing at first, but if you stick with it, there is something worthwhile in the story.



Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 14, 2009, 02:52:18 PM
Paranoia Agent Collection


Original Title: Mousou Dairinin
Year: 2004
Country: Japan
Rating: NR
Length: 319 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1

What they say
A mysterious mugging happened in Tokyo. The victim was Sagi Tsukiko, the designer of the incredibly popular toy Maromi. Tsukiko’s testimony is that the attacker was a young boy on rollerblades swinging a bent golden bat but many suspected Tsukiko to have knocked herself out. The reason was that the attack came at a convenient time when her boss was pressuring her to come up with the next groundbreaking design.

Soon after, the next victims appear, all of them going through some sort of crisis in their lives and their testimonies always involve "Shounen Bat", that young boy with the golden bat...

Who is this "Shounen Bat"? Who's his next target?

My Thoughts
What a weird series. I read that Satoshi Kon (Perfect Blue, Millenium Actress, Tokyo Godfathers) used Paranoia Agent to bring to fruition all the little ideas he had that couldn't be integrated into his movies. I don't how true it is, and I can't find the link where I read that, but whether it's true or not, the show feels like that.

It is such an eclectic mix of different styles, different themes, it's really unnerving. The basic story revolves around Lil' Slugger who goes around and smacks people who are "cornered emotionally". It starts standard enough, with a girl getting smacked while under pressure to create the new kid's mascot. Then two detectives take the case and start investigating.. and from there.. well it becomes a lot of different things.

The series itself is interesting. Might even be a good metaphor to mass hysteria/paranoia that could happen with a serial assaulter on the loose. Yet, it's not really my preference.



Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 14, 2009, 03:01:13 PM
The Adventures of Mini-Goddess


Original Title: Aa Megami-sama: Chicchai tte Koto wa Benri da ne
Year: 1998
Country: Japan
Rating: NR
Length: 356 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1

What they say
Belldandy. Urd. Skuld.

They're back -- sort of!

That's right, everyone's favorite goddesses are back, and this time they're on television. Unfortunately, though, someone seems to have washed them in hot water, as they've been shrunk.

Whenever Keiichi is away, it's time for Belldandy, Skuld, and Urd to play. Follow the Adventures of the Goddesses as they shrink down and have fun with their Rat sidekick, Gan-chan. Be it battling Gan-zilla or kitchen appliance romance, the Mini-Goddesses are there to have a good time.

My Thoughts
What do you do when you have a popular manga, that spawned a popular anime OVA, where the characters are Goddesses, and therefore have almost unlimited powers? Of course! You shrink them and have fun with them!

That's exactly what they did here: 48 episodes of simple fun.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on April 14, 2009, 04:31:50 PM
Spaced: Complete Series
 
Original Title: Spaced

My Thoughts
I finally watched Spaced. And you know what? I definitely should have joined the marathon Achim, Jon & Tom did back then. Both series are very good!

I love the mix of seriousness vs all-out comedy that happens in British sitcoms (at least, in the ones I've seen so far). I think it's something that is missing in most sitcoms this side of the pond.

I don't want to rehash what has been said here (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,486.0.html), so I'l say that I fully agree with most of what was said in that thread.

Highlights for me:
  • Tim doing the army dance at the rave in his tight pink shirt
  • Brian's installation at the art house - especially the reactions at the end
  • The whole "Matrix" episode at the beginning of Series 2
  • Anything with Tyres  :laugh:
  • Sophie  :drooling: :drooling: :drooling:

There are plenty of good moments, both funny and touching. The series as a whole is a great watch. You can't go wrong.

Somehow missed this post. ??? But anyway, I am so glad you enjoyed it after all our hype! :laugh: There's a documentary on disc 3 you might find interesting. It's more substantial and, basically, interesting than the average DVD filler. They even do a nice little scene on the doorstep of the flat suggesting a possible future for the characters (if not the series, sadly).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 14, 2009, 04:37:09 PM

Somehow missed this post. ??? But anyway, I am so glad you enjoyed it after all our hype! :laugh: There's a documentary on disc 3 you might find interesting. It's more substantial and, basically, interesting than the average DVD filler. They even do a nice little scene on the doorstep of the flat suggesting a possible future for the characters (if not the series, sadly).

I did watch the documentary. It was fun seeing them reliving all those experience and sharing it all with us. I also liked the part where they notice the two guys taking photos of the house and they just come out and talk to them. It was a nice moment.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 06, 2009, 06:31:39 AM
Ah! My Goddess TV Series Premium Box
Original Title: Aa Megami-sama
Year: 2004
Country: Japan
Director:
Rating: NR
Length: 632 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio:
Subtitles:
   


What they say
Keiichi Morisato is an engineering student, top driver of his campus motor club, and not very lucky with the ladies. While calling for take-out food one evening, a wrong number puts him in contact with the "Goddess Hotline". One misplaced wish later, Keiichi finds himself blessed with Belldandy, the perfect girlfriend and a goddess in every sense of the word. Unfortunately, she doesn't have any idea of how to act in the human world, and her presence quickly gets Keiichi kicked out of the dorms. Fortunately for Keiichi, his troubles have just begun!

My Thoughts
As mentioned in the very first review of this thread (my my! has it been that long already?) the TV series format is much better suited to the Ah! My Goddess world than the OVA was. There's a lot happening. What I like is how they handled the introductions of the characters. They actually spread them out pretty well all over the series. It's like whenever the series would start feeling stale by focusing too much on the same character, they'd mix things up by introducing someone new. And once everybody is introduced, they have fun with the relationships between them. Of course, the Goddess angle would have absolutely no meaning if they didn't actually make it an obstacle, which they do, especially towards the end of the series.

I really enjoyed the series. It's a a very light hearted romantic comedy, and it's really fun.



--- edit ---
I just ordered Series 2.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 13, 2009, 01:49:57 PM
Ai Yori Aoshi
   


Original Title: Ai Yori Aoshi
Year: 2001
Country: Japan
Rating: NR
Length: 24x ~22 min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
Kaoru Hanabishi just wanted to help. Aoi Sakuraba just wanted to find her first love. They never realized they were looking for each other. Ever since their arranged marriage 18 years ago, Aoi had been in love with Kaoru, but she traveled to Tokyo to meet him when she learned the marriage had been called off. While Kaoru’s impressed by Aoi’s loyalty, innocence and beauty, to accept her affection, he might have to return to the Hanabishi Clan and the emotional and physical pain he suffered during his childhood... Their self-control and their love will be put to the test when she moves in and he tries to stay a gentleman!

My Thoughts
Very enjoyable series. This is a harem-style romantic comedy, with all the quirkyness that comes with it.

The series is fun. There's a good mix of silly comedy, awkwardness, soft and heart warming moments. The secondary characters are interesting, if a little unidimensional. One aspect I was surprised with is how they handled Taeko (one of the secondary character), which is introduced as being incredibly clumsy. So I immediately thought they'd overuse it. Well, I'm glad they didn't, which kept the character interesting. Actually, I found something to like in every characters, which is surprising.

Definitely looking forward to watching the sequel, Ai Yori Aoshi: Enishi!

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 14, 2009, 03:57:31 AM
Wow! I just finished doing something I've been putting off for a while now: putting newly watched stuff onto the bookshelves. They reason I had been putting it off so much is that I knew I'd have to make the whole thing spill out into a second room, but I didn't want to do it yet.. Today I bit the bullet. I had no choice, I had to move the table on which they were being accumulated.

What I ended up doing is take out all the Disney/"Kids" animations. along with anything that could be classified as "special interest" (music concerts, humour stand up, etc) as well as some odd shaped cases and moved them to another shelving unit I already had. This cleared three full shelves, leaving room for the new stuff, and some room to spare.

But, it's now painfully obvious I will have to modify my sorting. I'll probably end up having to go the "per-genre" route, or take the TV-series out and place them elsewhere. We'll see..
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 18, 2009, 07:24:06 AM
Ai Yori Aoshi Enishi
 
Original Title: Ai Yori Aoshi Enishi
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Rating: 13+
Length: 278 Min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English, Japanese
Subtitles: English

 

What they say
One year after the arrival of Chika, things become livelier than ever in the Sakuraba residence. With Chika’s embarrassing questions, Tina’s love for breast fondling, Mayu’s puppy-dog love of Hanabishi-sama, Taeko’s cute clumsiness, and Miyabi’s absolute totalitarian rule of the mansion, Kaoru has a lot to handle. Combining the wants and needs of his friends and his loyalty to Aoi, will Kaoru be able to survive the emotional pressure?

My Thoughts
What a sad day this is. Yeah, despite the fact my nieces were here today. Despite the fact I finally got my NAS running today. It is still a sad day. It is the day I just finished watching Ai Yori Aoshi Enishi.

Ok, maybe not that much! Haha! But I did love the series a lot. I found the characters to be fresh and interesting. Yes, they are stereotypical, but the way they are presented, and the way the interact with one another makes the show so interesting. Also, while I would've gladly watched a lot more Ai Yori Aoshi, I do think the show benefitted the shorter format of Enishi (12 episodes), as opposed to the 24 episodes of the first series. They could make the show tighter and they didn't have use filler stuff to get the full series. I also found the supporting cast more interesting this time around, mostly because they are actually being given screen time!



PS.: I want to add one more thing. While some people would say it is absolute heresy, I'm still unable to watch Anime subtitled. I still watch it dubbed. And this time, I'm glad I did. The woman who does the voice for Mayu (one of the secondary character) just has that little something in her voice that gets me. It's the kind of voice I could close my eyes and just listen to all day long. She has a special little intonation I like in her voice. I'll probably be hunting down more of her work!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 18, 2009, 06:10:34 PM
Heresy!!!  :voodoo:

My ears start to bleed everytime I forget to switch to the original Japanese track before starting an episode. English dubs of animes are really bad. I don't know why, but the English voices (especially the female ones) I really cannot stand. And to make matters worse, it is almost always the same bunch of voice actors (especially if it's a ADV release).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 18, 2009, 06:43:20 PM
My ears start to bleed everytime I forget to switch to the original Japanese track before starting an episode. English dubs of animes are really bad. I don't know why, but the English voices (especially the female ones) I really cannot stand. And to make matters worse, it is almost always the same bunch of voice actors (especially if it's a ADV release).

Yeah, I fully understand what you mean. But I just can't enjoy watching while reading subtitles at the same time. I keep trying though, but I just can't. I always find myself reverting to the english dub.

The real test will be when I start watching Gunbuster.. I'll then have no choice, as there's no english dub on it. Maybe by the time I'm done watching the series, and if the series is good, I'll be a convert ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 18, 2009, 07:42:24 PM
By the way: Any plans to watch "Full Metal Panic" or "Midori Days" soon? :)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 18, 2009, 08:06:36 PM
Hmmm Full Metal Panic is actually a good idea for the next viewing, seeing as I'm itching for something with a little more action and a little less romance after AMG and AYA.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 18, 2009, 09:30:26 PM
Just as an example using one of your recently watched animes:
In "Ah My Goddess" Belldandy has just such a pleasant voice in the original. But in the English dub I always want to claw my ears off. And noone seems to be able to pronounce Belldandy's name correctly. Also the sisters are great. I especially love the voice of Skuld. It's perfect for a spoiled child who whines when something doesn't go her way.

Japanese:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97nt1xW-920

English:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGtlbhTHMSQ
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 18, 2009, 10:17:55 PM
I know what you mean, and I fully realize that I should probably watch the original japanese voices..

but the thing is, I don't find the english voices irritating at all, and it allows me to concentrate on the animation, instead of being stuck reading subtitles, and often having to rewind/pause because I didn't have time to read the whole subtitle..
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 18, 2009, 10:29:07 PM
Yes, that probably depends on how fast you read. I know others who don't want to watch the original language of movies, which aren't German or English, because they don't want to be distracted from the picture.
I do not have problems with subtitled movies as I am a fairly fast reader. Usually I have read the subtitles long before the characters actually have spoken the lines and I can go back to watch the picture. I am quite accustomed to take a quick look at the bottom of the screen to read the next line and then go back to watch the movie. It's also the reason why I prefer English subtitles over German ones. They are much faster to read. For one thing it's usually a little shorter, but mainly it's because of the English grammar as you can get the drift of the sentence with only taking a quick peak.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on May 18, 2009, 11:08:54 PM
I do not have problems with subtitled movies as I am a fairly fast reader. Usually I have read the subtitles long before the characters actually have spoken the lines and I can go back to watch the picture. I am quite accustomed to take a quick look at the bottom of the screen to read the next line and then go back to watch the movie. It's also the reason why I prefer English subtitles over German ones. They are much faster to read. For one thing it's usually a little shorter, but mainly it's because of the English grammar as you can get the drift of the sentence with only taking a quick peak.
For me it's exactly the same. Another reason I choose english subs over german one (in an english movie) is that the subs match what is spoken. You read the same that you are about to hear. German subs would confuse me because what I read isn't what I hear.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on May 19, 2009, 09:36:52 AM
My :2cents::

I cannot stand to watch dubbed films at all any more. Not only does the lip movement not match but usually the ambient sound is almost completely removed.

Obviously animation lends itself a bit easier to being dubbed. Often though the voice is recorded first with the animation then being made to match lips (I know Pixar does it all the time, but I am not sure it's the standard in regular animation). But, if the original actor can get in the mood to perform in the empty room, someone else should be able to do the same. Still, somehow I still tend to stick to the original; like I did with Midoroi Days, The Girl Who Leapt Through Time and soon with Death Note.

Maybe us Germans have a greater tendency to accept the subtitles as we are more used to them...? Then again, there was "quite a few" subtitled movies during my childhood but I don't know if that's still the case. In general Germany has the tendency to dub.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on May 19, 2009, 10:16:05 AM
Maybe us Germans have a greater tendency to accept the subtitles as we are more used to them...? Then again, there was "quite a few" subtitled movies during my childhood but I don't know if that's still the case. In general Germany has the tendency to dub.
I can only speak for me, but I don't know any german television program that has subtitles. In germany basically everything is dubbed nowadays and as far as I can remember back.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 19, 2009, 03:27:04 PM
Maybe us Germans have a greater tendency to accept the subtitles as we are more used to them...? Then again, there was "quite a few" subtitled movies during my childhood but I don't know if that's still the case. In general Germany has the tendency to dub.
I can only speak for me, but I don't know any german television program that has subtitles. In germany basically everything is dubbed nowadays and as far as I can remember back.

It's the same here in Quebec, everything dubbed, so most everybody grew up with dubbing. It's actually very hard with most "average joes" to get them to watch a movie in english, even when they are perfectly bilingual. They'll still watch the french dub.

That I can't understand. If you understand the original language, what's the point in watching the dub?

In the case of languages you don't understand... well...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 19, 2009, 05:12:41 PM
Often though the voice is recorded first with the animation then being made to match lips (I know Pixar does it all the time, but I am not sure it's the standard in regular animation). But, if the original actor can get in the mood to perform in the empty room, someone else should be able to do the same. Still, somehow I still tend to stick to the original; like I did with Midoroi Days, The Girl Who Leapt Through Time and soon with Death Note.

For US productions this is correct: They usually record the voices first and then animate. In Japanese animes on the other hand they usually do it the other way around. But the thing what makes the Japanese tracks so fun to listen to is, that they record "live". I.e. all persons which are part of the scene are all in one room and dub a complete scene together at once (as a matter of fact even the ones not part of the scene are nearby and watch. It seems more like a stage rehearsal). American productions usually record takes of single lines with usually only one actor (or sometimes two) present at a time.
This is why Japanese dubbing is so lively and have a much better flow.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 19, 2009, 05:52:20 PM
Hey Tom, I started watching Full Metal Panic yesterday, and it's awesome! Thanks for the suggestion, both to watch it now, and to buy it back then! I had to force myself to stop watching and go to bed last night because I had to go to work this morning!

I'm getting an almost 24-like vibe from it, with the episodes ending on sort of little cliffhangers and just wanting to keep going and find out what happens next! That's a bit scary, because it means I could get through the whole thing (First Raid, Fumoffu and Second Raid) all in the course of a single week, if it keeps up like that!

But, I'm loving the show so far (end of FirstRaid.Mission.02) and I can't wait to get home tonight and keep going!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 19, 2009, 05:58:28 PM
I am really glad you enjoy it! :)

I also have had the urge to revisit Fumoffu and TSR again, but I have lent my DVDs to a friend a while back and I still don't have them back :(
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on May 19, 2009, 06:16:35 PM
It's the same here in Quebec, everything dubbed, so most everybody grew up with dubbing. It's actually very hard with most "average joes" to get them to watch a movie in english, even when they are perfectly bilingual. They'll still watch the french dub.
But to defend the Quebec dubbing the job is usually well done when it's done here in french canadian, the problem is when it's made in France (wrong expression used and annoying accent). I'm sure that many French Canadian who understand the english perfectly prefer to watch The Flinstone or The Simpsons or Slap Shot dub because our versions are better.

But I watch most of my movie in their original language (with or without subtitles when in english) since this is the only way that I have in my 99.999% french speaking region to keep my english hearing. In theory our province is bilingual, but except for Montreal you don't hear too many english speaking in it.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 19, 2009, 06:21:46 PM
I also have had the urge to revisit Fumoffu and TSR again, but I have lent my DVDs to a friend a while back and I still don't have them back :(

Yeah, I know the feeling. I lend my DVD too to family and close friends, and tell them to take their time, that there's no rush to bring them back. But I hate getting the urge to watch something, only to find out someone borrowed it.

And somehow, I always feel bad asking for it back, even though it's mine to begin with!..
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 19, 2009, 07:02:57 PM
I'm getting an almost 24-like vibe from it, with the episodes ending on sort of little cliffhangers and just wanting to keep going and find out what happens next! That's a bit scary, because it means I could get through the whole thing (First Raid, Fumoffu and Second Raid) all in the course of a single week, if it keeps up like that!

That reminds me: Once when I wanted to show one or two episodes of Fumoffu to my brother and a friend of mine, we ended up watching all 12 episodes in one go (must have 2 or 3 o'clock in the morning when we were finally finished) :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on May 20, 2009, 06:29:26 AM
Maybe us Germans have a greater tendency to accept the subtitles as we are more used to them...? Then again, there was "quite a few" subtitled movies during my childhood but I don't know if that's still the case. In general Germany has the tendency to dub.
I can only speak for me, but I don't know any german television program that has subtitles. In germany basically everything is dubbed nowadays and as far as I can remember back.
I did put the "quite a few" in quotes on purpose... Seems I generally created a wrong impression. Of course "general" TV had always been dubbed. However, I remember seeing some dubbed films on late night TV or on the less mainstream channels, such as N3.

Well., I don't know, I just wanted to say that over the time at least I can read (the subtitles) and enjoy a film at the same time.
Title: Re: My Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on May 24, 2009, 03:31:06 AM

Rating:
Just watch it tonight since it was on TV and the best of all at the SRC so not too much publicity. Not really too much to say except that even if this is a french movie give it a chance and get it. The movie is subtitled in english, you have no excuse to not try it. I know that I don't own it myself, but I can access it by a relative who own the film (I will probably check the second hand store to get it anyway soon).

This time I was more in the film and I was able to really appreciate it, by chance I was alone since I've passed almost 2 hours crying. Certainly one of our best movie (not something that you will heard me say often for this genre of film)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 31, 2009, 05:47:55 PM
   Full Metal Panic! / Fumoffu / Second Raid
   

What they say
On the surface, Kaname Chidori appears to be a normal, popular high school student. The problem is, she doesn't realize just how popular she is. Unbeknownst to her, a group of terrorists believe she possesses the special powers of "the Whispered," and they're out to kidnap her. Enter Sousuke Sagara, a young, hotshot agent from the stealth anti-terrorist organization Mithril. Will he be able to protect Kaname without her finding out what's really going on? Or will he just drive her crazy as he tries to fit in as her awkward gung-ho, war-crazed classmate?

My Thoughts
Like I already said previously in this thread, I loved the show through and through. There's a great balance between the action, the romance and the comedic elements. I especially like how they used the secondary characters. Personally, I didn't find Chidori to be all that interesting as a main character. It changes by the end of Second Raid mind you, but at first, despite being the second lead, it felt like she was there as filler to drive Sousuke. I found the secondary cast much more interesting, especially Tessa (the captain) and Kyoko (Chidori's best friend).

FMP and Second Raid can be seen as a single long story, and is the "meat" of the series. One thing I found a bit sad, is that you don't get to see the full extent of ARX-7 "Arbalest"'s (Sousuke's Arm Slave) full power until the very last episode. It makes sense in the context of the story, but as they reveal the full power of the mecha, it opens up a slew of opportunity... that goes unexplored! Still, the story is fun and the character's growth, well Sousuke's anyway, is kept interesting.

Fumoffu on the other hand, is a spin off. It could be seen as "what happens while Sousuke is undercover at the high school and not not driving his AS". It's meant to be light hearted and fun. It is. I loved it. Probably even more than I did the main story. There's one thing though.. I know it wouldn't make sense.. but.. What was my darling Tessa? I missed her! Yes, they managed to write her into Fumoffu, but it wasn't long enough! Oh well, the rest of it was still very fun (especially the episode where Sousuke trains the school's rugby team! hahaha)

All in all, it was a great show. Thanks for the recommendation Tom! Guess I can now consider just about any anime you like as a wishlist item* ;)



* I started watching Midori Days, and I'm loving it too! Hence the comment about considering anything you like as good hehe
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 31, 2009, 07:14:41 PM
I am glad that you were enjoying these three series just as much as I was :)

.. but.. What was my darling Tessa? I missed her! Yes, they managed to write her into Fumoffu, but it wasn't long enough!

Something we agree on. Tessa is such a sweetie. Not for nothing that I had her as my avatar for awhile (and as I see, you have one now also :) ). Did you know, that although most of Fumoffu was based on existing FMP short stories, they have written the two Tessa shows just for the anime? They were so much fun, that the author of FMP later adapted them into short stories though.
Real fun for us Tessa fans was the very last episode in the TSR set. This episode was originally released as an OVA one year after the end of TSR.

All in all, it was a great show. Thanks for the recommendation Tom! Guess I can now consider just about any anime you like as a wishlist item* ;)



* I started watching Midori Days, and I'm loving it too! Hence the comment about considering anything you like as good hehe
Yes, Midori Days is another real fun anime. Nice to see that we have similar tastes :)
Recently I have bought "This Ugly Yet Beautiful World" as I have came attention to it awhile back when I saw it as one of your items in the WhatYaGot thread. Have you watched it yet? I don't remember if I have read a review of yours about it.
Did you watch "Azumanga Daioh" yet? This is also one of my all-time favorite which I already watched multiple times.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 31, 2009, 07:30:20 PM
Something we agree on. Tessa is such a sweetie. Not for nothing that I had her as my avatar for awhile (and as I see, you have one now also :) ). Did you know, that although most of Fumoffu was based on existing FMP short stories, they have written the two Tessa shows just for the anime? They were so much fun, that the author of FMP later adapted them into short stories though.
Real fun for us Tessa fans was the very last episode in the TSR set. This episode was originally released as an OVA one year after the end of TSR.

I didn't know any of that. Nice! And I loved that last episode of TSR with Tessa!

I love how she plays with her hair anytime she's thinking or concentrating, hence my choice of avatar ;)

Yes, Midori Days is another real fun anime. Nice to see that we have similar tastes :)

At the beginning of the first episode, and when I realized what the show was going to be about, I got a bit concerned. It looked way too crazy for me.. But they won me over after the first episode! It's pure fun!

Recently I have bought "This Ugly Yet Beautiful World" as I have came attention to it awhile back when I saw it as one of your items in the WhatYaGot thread. Have you watched it yet? I don't remember if I have read a review of yours about it.
Did you watch "Azumanga Daioh" yet? This is also one of my all-time favorite which I already watched multiple times.

That's a negatory to both. I hadn't been watching much of anything, even less anime. But I'm on a roll now! And I feel like watching Anime.

Who knows, maybe I'll even get to "The Girl Who Leapt Through Time" before long  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on May 31, 2009, 08:02:45 PM
Who knows, maybe I'll even get to "The Girl Who Leapt Through Time" before long  :laugh:

You definately should!! ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 01, 2009, 06:25:50 PM
Midori Days


         
Original Title: Midori no hibi
Year: 2004
Country: Japan
Director: Tsuneo Kobayashi
Rating: PG-13
Length: 13x 24min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

      


What they say
Seji "Mad Dog" Sawamura is the ultimate high-school punk. With his super-strong, invincible right hand, he can punch through cenemt walls and lay waste to entire street gangs. But street cred comes with a high price - every girl in the school is absolutely terrified of him! Just when he thinks he is doomed to fly solo forever, Seji's right hand becomes an actual girl! Midori Kasugano wished she could be by Seiji's side...but ended up somehow attached to his wrist. Seiji's fighting days may be over, but his girl-trouble days are about to begin!!

My Thoughts
Not much to say really. It's an enjoyable little series, but nothing too special. It got a bit too sappy at times for my tastes. All in all, it was a fun and worthwile watch.



I need to change that image. It is not at all the cover I have on my DVD
Cover updated!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 01, 2009, 06:29:23 PM
Midori Days



Seems like you cannot trust my recommendations blindly anymore  :bag:


Quote
I need to change that image. It is not at all the cover I have on my DVD
It matches my release though.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 01, 2009, 06:40:57 PM
Midori Days


Seems like you cannot trust my recommendations blindly anymore  :bag:

I wouldn't say that. I may have not been as enthusiastic about Midori Days as I was with Full Metal Panic, but I still enjoyed Midori Days. Just a little less than you I guess ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 01, 2009, 06:43:47 PM
Now I would be interested in your opinion of Azumanga Daioh ;)
It's something completely different to FMP and Midori.
This one could go either way for you. For me, this series just got better and better.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 01, 2009, 06:56:50 PM
Now I would be interested in your opinion of Azumanga Daioh ;)
It's something completely different to FMP and Midori.
This one could go either way for you. For me, this series just got better and better.

Guess I know what I'm watching next ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 03, 2009, 12:25:22 AM
Now I would be interested in your opinion of Azumanga Daioh ;)
It's something completely different to FMP and Midori.
This one could go either way for you. For me, this series just got better and better.

Different you say? Wow! At first, I could barely keep up! It's such a hyperactive show! There's what? 1,000,000 mini-episodes per 24-minute episode? (slight exaggeration :laugh:)

But I like it. It's got great humour so far.

I also know where you got your current avatar from (though you might've mentioned it before, I can't remember)! And guess what? I think she'll turn out to be my favourite character too ;)

She'll get tough competition from Sakaki though. She got me, right from the start, when i-forget-her-name wants Kaorin wants to ask her to join the astronomy club, but never actually asks, and Sakaki just says "I wish she'd invited me"... that's so me!!)

from 3:05 -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQEkRbsMAqQ
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 03, 2009, 07:58:54 PM
Different you say? Wow! At first, I could barely keep up! It's such a hyperactive show! There's what? 1,000,000 mini-episodes per 24-minute episode? (slight exaggeration :laugh:)
Hyperactive? And here I thought the series could be paced too slowly for you :laugh:
I think I have explained it in my review. The original manga was a 4-panel comic you find in daily newspapers. And I think this is reflected well in the series. Also one 25 minutes episode was originally five 5-minute episodes (aired during the week), with all bundled to one episode airing on Saturday.

Quote
I also know where you got your current avatar from (though you might've mentioned it before, I can't remember)! And guess what? I think she'll turn out to be my favourite character too ;)
Yes, Nyamo is one of my favorites in this series

Quote
She'll get tough competition from Sakaki though. She got me, right from the start, when i-forget-her-name wants Kaorin wants to ask her to join the astronomy club, but never actually asks, and Sakaki just says "I wish she'd invited me"... that's so me!!)
Yes, Sakaki is the obvious fan-favorite. But I have one character, without which I think the series would only be half as fun. And that is Tomo. She won me over in the episode where they first visited Chiyo-chan's summer house (the scene with the key).
Another character, which I like, is Kagura. She joins the group in the second school year. She may seem like a rip-off of Sakaki mixed with Tomo, but somehow I found her more interesting.

Quote
from 3:05 -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQEkRbsMAqQ

Aaaahhh! Ears bleeding!  :tease:
I am joking. It wasn't as bad as some other dubs. Except for the terrible voice of Chiyo, this part was watchable.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 03, 2009, 09:19:06 PM
I think I have explained it in my review.

You probably did. I did read the review back then, but I didn't read it now before watching, so I didn't remember. I did go on the internet afterwards and found out about the 5-minute episode, 1 per day during the week, and then the replay of all 5 into a single episode on the weekend. And I actually like that format now!

Quote
from 3:05 -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQEkRbsMAqQ
Quote
Aaaahhh! Ears bleeding!  :tease:
I am joking. It wasn't as bad as some other dubs. Except for the terrible voice of Chiyo, this part was watchable.

I know I know.. I thought about warning you in advance, but then you wouldn't have gone and watched it ;)

I just remembered.. I had a really big "WTF" moment during the first episode. Twice actually. When Chiyo does her "cooking is so fun" segment. I actually said aloud "WTF" hahaha!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 03, 2009, 11:27:51 PM
I just remembered.. I had a really big "WTF" moment during the first episode. Twice actually. When Chiyo does her "cooking is so fun" segment. I actually said aloud "WTF" hahaha!

This scene is some kind of deal breaker. I remember, when I first watched this episode, I had my first big laugh there. I don't know why. This scene has the potential to turn off most viewers if the opening didn't already. The opening is one of those, where you think WTF the first time you see it, but it really grows more and more on you every time you watch it. After the third episode I couldn't get it out of my mind anymore.


Here is something which I also have watched many times. An AMV based on Azumanga scenes. I usually do not watch many AMVs, because most of them are not worthwhile to watch, but this one I really enjoy (doesn't include any spoilers):
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=23197757
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 03, 2009, 11:48:17 PM
This scene is some kind of deal breaker. I remember, when I first watched this episode, I had my first big laugh there. I don't know why. This scene has the potential to turn off most viewers


It was really odd and it came out of nowhere.

Quote
The opening is one of those, where you think WTF the first time you see it, but it really grows more and more on you every time you watch it. After the third episode I couldn't get it out of my mind anymore.

I thought the opening was really odd, but it does set the tone of the series. You know right then and there to pretty much expect anything and that the show has the potential of going completely crazy!

Quote
Here is something which I also have watched many times. An AMV based on Azumanga scenes. I usually do not watch many AMVs, because most of them are not worthwhile to watch, but this one I really enjoy (doesn't include any spoilers):
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=23197757

Pardon my ignorance but... What's an AMV?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 03, 2009, 11:57:03 PM
Pardon my ignorance but... What's an AMV?

Anime Music Video.
A video made by fans using a music track and setting it to scenes of one or more animes.
Most are not worthwhile to watch. But sometimes you encounter one, which really is just perfectly edited. Or tell a good story or have otherwise an original idea.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 08, 2009, 05:28:55 AM
I'm halfway through Volume 4 of Azumanga Daioh now, and I'm enjoying it thoroughly. But against all odds, my favorite character has changed. I'm liking Osaka more and more each episode. She pretty much has all the best moments, and she single handedly makes me laugh the most. The facial expressions (or lack thereof) they give her are priceless. And her totally out of the blue remarks... I love them!  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 08, 2009, 09:54:49 AM
Osaka is also the favorite character of a friend of mine (tied with Sakaki). Although she has great scenes, she never was a favorite of mine. I would rate the six girls like this:
1. Tomo
2. Kagura
3. Sakaki
4. Chiyo
5. Osaka
6. Yomi

This tells how good this series is to me. Even such a great character like Osaka only manages to get place 5, being surpassed by four others. And this is not even including supporting characters like the teachers or Kaorin.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 08, 2009, 12:47:53 PM
I wish they'd given more screen time to Kaorin.. but then, with the type of character they make her out to be, it would probably get really old really fast to see her lose all sense of reality every time Sakaki is around hehe
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 08, 2009, 01:21:54 PM
I wish they'd given more screen time to Kaorin.. but then, with the type of character they make her out to be, it would probably get really old really fast to see her lose all sense of reality every time Sakaki is around hehe

They enhanced her role a little compared to the manga. There she had an even smaller part.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 08, 2009, 06:25:10 PM
I would rate the six girls like this:
1. Tomo
2. Kagura
...

Seems you prefer energetic girls!

I prefer the darker, calmer ones, hence Osaka and Sakaki being my favorites ;)

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 08, 2009, 06:28:23 PM
I would rate the six girls like this:
1. Tomo
2. Kagura
...

Seems you prefer energetic girls!

I prefer the darker, calmer ones, hence Osaka and Sakaki being my favorites ;)



I usually do also, but here these two characters cause the most fun in my opinion. In the beginning, Sakaki was also my favorite.
But my favorite character overall is Nyamo (see my avatar). And she counts as calm (or at least rational), doesn't she? :)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 08, 2009, 06:50:28 PM
And she counts as calm (or at least rational), doesn't she? :)

Until the second visit to Chiyo's summer house that is  :hysterical:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 16, 2009, 07:37:37 PM
   Azumanga Daioh: Class Album
   
 
            
Original Title: Azumanga daiô
Year: 2002
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroshi Nishikiori
Rating: TV-PG
Length: 26 x ~24 min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English
         

   
Chiyo-chan
Osaka
Miss Sakaki
Yomi
Tomo
   


What they say
In Miss Yukari's English class, every day is an adventure.

First off, there's the airhead teacher herself. She may have graduated from high school, but she sure hasn't left. And with the arrival of two transfer students - a ten-year-old prodigy and a space cadet - it's going to be an intersting class! Between handling enormous assignments, dodging murderous volleyballs, and eduring endless rivalries, summer vacation should serve as a welcome break for the weary student - unless your teachers come with you! Getting through three years alive with this motley crew is going to be an adventure!

My Thoughts
Osaka: I've always wanted to trip on a banana peel and fall on my face!

That was great! The series was a nice change of pace from what I'm used to. I usually watch anime where they stick to a story that is told through the length of the series. Here, without going too deep into the format of the series (which Tom explains much better than I ever could (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,626.msg68703.html#msg68703)), we very loosely follow the girls as they go through the 3 years of high school. But, despite that, each episode is selfcontained. There's no real overarching plot or anything, but there are some references to previous episodes, but nothing serious.

The series is a comedy through and through. From the animation style, to the character designs (as you can notice from the covers above) everything is geared toward humour. And it worked for me. I found the whole series hilarious. While I do have my favourites, Osaka was consistently the funniest to me and they just can't feature Sakaki enough to satisfy me, all the characters have their "moment", even the supporting characters.

All in all, a great, light, fun and humorous series. I loved it!

.5
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on June 16, 2009, 07:56:10 PM
Time for another series  :laugh:

Looking at your collection you have still some other great anime. I don't know, if you watched any of these yet, but I can really recommend:
Elfen Lied
The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya
Gunslinger Girl
and of course
The Girl Who Leapt Through Time
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 16, 2009, 08:17:54 PM
Time for another series  :laugh:

Looking at your collection you have still some other great anime. I don't know, if you watched any of these yet, but I can really recommend:
Elfen Lied
The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya
Gunslinger Girl
and of course
The Girl Who Leapt Through Time

I have yet to watch any of those yet.

I'm currently watching Ah! My Goddess: Flights of Fancy (I think I like it even more than the first series!), then I was going to watch The Girl Who Leapt Through Time, and then take a little break from Anime and watch a few movies, or a TV series or 2.

But then, I've also had my sight on Madlax. I loved Noir when I watched it, and Madlax, if I'm not mistaken, is pretty much the same people from what I read. That or Gad Guard.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 10, 2009, 04:18:21 AM
Ah! My Goddess: Flights of Fancy: TV Series Season 2
 
Original Title: Aa Megami-sama: Sorezore no Tsubasa
Year: 2006
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroaki Gohda
Rating: TV-PG
Length: 24x 24min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

What they say
The song may say "Thank heaven for little girls" - but who is college student Keiichi Morisato supposed to thank when three honest to goodness living Goddesses move in and take over his life? And should he really be all that grateful?

After all, in most mythologies, close relationships between mortals and immortals usually lead to mortifying complications, so we're already talking about an extremely mixed blessing! And when a FOURTH Goddess suddenly appears, that blessing becomes more like a curse! They may just be trying to help, but sometimes it seems that Belldandy, Skuld, Urd and Peorth might be less concerned with Keiichi's safety than they are with establishing a pecking order and ownership rights!

The delicate celestial balance that exists between human and goddess is thrown into complete and utter chaos in Ah! My Goddess 2 - The Complete Collection!

My Thought
That was great! I loved every minute of it. The introduction of a fourth goddess, even though she has a teeny tiny role, and having Urd's (who's half demon half goddess) mom come into play was a nice touch. I thought they kept it very interesting, balancing the standard everyday life and goddess elements really well. There's also some great moments, both funny and touching.

Rating:

The whole Ah My Goddess series, including both TV Series, the OVA and the Mini-Goddess adventures, is really worthwhile. It's fun, has a great story and great characters. You can't go wrong with it.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 10, 2009, 04:33:35 AM
   Madlax Collection
   
 
         
Original Title: Madlax
Year: 2004
Country: Japan
Director: Koichi Mashimo
Rating: TV-14
Length: 26x 25min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

      

     

What they say
The country of Gazth-Sonika has been engaged in a civil war for more than a decade, struggling to stay afloat amidst attacks from the anti-government faction known as Garza. With lies and corruption seeping into the political food chain, a mysterious book in one young girl’s possession may be the only key to uncovering the truth and bringing an end to the war. This book, however, is sought by many. And when the invincible agent Madlax is hired to protect those in search of its truth, Gazth-Sonika dispatches a ruthless soldier to make sure that truth stays in the darkness...

My Thoughts
I'm disappointed by Madlax. Granted, I had high hopes for it, seeing as it is made by pretty much the same team that did Noir, which I loved. Something's amiss here.

In Noir, the plot was dense, very mysterious and a bit hard to follow at times, but it still made sense and you could make out what was going on. Here, in Madlax, they went for mystery overload! Half the series, I had pretty much no idea what was going on. The plot is incredibly dense and hard to follow at times, it's scary. But, I must say, in the end, during the last few episodes, the puzzle pieces actually do fall into place and everything starts make sense... somewhat. There's still a whole mystical event that isn't explained. There's no mention of how it could happen, why it could be reversed, and why it happened again!

A big positive though, and it was the same in Noir, is that the fight sequences are incredible. They are well choreographed and, as opposed to some other series, the "sexy" factor doesn't overpower the action. Madlax is a tough mercenary, and they stay true to it all the way.

Again, the music by Yuki Kajiura is awesome, blending different genre into a whole that elevates the series to a while new level. I'm still haunted by Madlax's fight theme.

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 28, 2009, 10:25:41 PM
   Gad Guard
   
Original Title: Gado Gado
Year: 2003
Country: Japan
Director: Hiroshi Nishikiori
Rating: NR
Length: 26 x 24min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo, English: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English

     


What they say
Many people have searched for it, many have stolen it, and many will kill for it. The Gad is a seemingly magical stone which, once making a strong spiritual connection with someone, will grow into a very powerful robot known as a Techode -- a mechanical being that embodies the will of the bonded person. This is the story of Hajiki Sanada, a boy struggling to help support his fatherless family in an electricity-impoverished city known as Night Town. One day he encounters the Gad and a special bond is formed. Now his life will never be the same...

My Thoughts
Nice little show. Nothing too fancy, but I liked it. The animation style is interesting, especially the ladies (the adult ones, the children are drawn in the "standard" way, but the adult ladies have something different going on in their drawing style), makes them seem more "sexy".

The story is pretty standard: poor, hard working kid gets his hand on cutting edge "technology" (a Gad) which gives him almost infinite powers when it transforms into a Techode (think giant robot, but a robot that has a will of its own, to a certain extent). The show revolves around Hajiki and trying to understand what are Techodes, while defending the people he loves. He also grows quite a bit as a character during the course of the show. The revelation, at the end, of what the Gads actually are is a nice twist, and it gives a whole new perspective on the events that happen during the show.

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 28, 2009, 10:37:29 PM
   All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku Collection
   
 
Original Title: Bannou Bunka Neko-Musume
Year: 1992
Country: Japan
Director: Hidetoshi Shigematsu
Rating: NR
Length: 6x 30min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English: Dolby Digital 5.1, Japanese: Dolby Digital Stereo
Subtitles: English


What they say
When inventor Kyusaku Natsume transfers the brain of his son Ryunosuke's cat into a top secret android body, the family doesn't lose a pet... they gain a daughter! While she may look like a typical teenage girl to the rest of the world, Nuku Nuku's feminine exterior hides the superhuman strength and abilities of the NK-1124 android chassis, making her the most potent fighting force ever unleashed upon an unsuspecting Japan... and the ideal bodyguard for Ryunosuke!

But can even Nuku Nuku keep her young charge out of the insidious clutches of the ruthless Akiko Mishima, president of Mishima Heavy Industries (M.H.I.), financier of the NK-1124 project, Kyusaku's ex-wife and Ryunosuke's mother? The greatest custody battle of all time erupts in a conflagration across Japan as Akiko unleashes the full force of M.H.I.'s military products division, manned by her elite team of Office-Lady Warriors, in her bid to win back Ryunosuke.

My Thoughts
Just read the back blurb again. It pretty much sums up the whole show.

What I find sad is that they didn't play the cat-brain angle enough. They show Nuku-Nuku as being a pretty standard high school girl. The fact the android body has a cat brain doesn't come into play enough. They play on the android side, more than the cat side, and I think it would've been funnier the other way around. There are a couple of visual jokes of Nuku-Nuku actually being a cat (like when she finds a job and curls up on the table for a nap, or when she goes berserk after seeing a few rats) but they are too few.

This might all stem from the format of the show though. The show doesn't take itself seriously at all. Most of comedy comes from the fights between Nuku-Nuku and all the crazy military hardware. Every fight is completely over-the-top, but it's fun that way, The problem is the length of the show. 6 half hour episode is not enough to flesh out the characters and all. They jump right into the action and never let go.

It's fun, very funny, and interesting. But I just wish they had the time to flesh out the characters and have fun with the characters, instead of with the situations.

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 03, 2009, 06:16:29 AM
   All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku TV: Complete Collection
   
 
            
Original Title: Bannou Bunka Neko-Musume
Year: 1998
Country: Japan
Director: Yoshitaka Fujimota
Rating: TV-PG
Length: 14 x 30 min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English, Japanese
Subtitles: English

         

     

What they say
When Natsume Atsuko, nicknamed Nuku Nuku, comes to live with Ryounosuke’s family, he falls in love instantly. After all, to all appearances, she’s a beautiful, normal, if slightly ditzy, teenage girl. In reality, however, she’s an all-purpose cat-brained andorobot who’s escaped from Mishima Heavy Industries’ research laboratories. She’s not supposed to use her special powers, but when more of Mishima’s experiments run amuck and her friends are threatened, she’ll do whatever she can to save them. It’s never just another day at school when your classmate’s an All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl!

My Thoughts
I liked it, more than I should have really. It did shed a new light on the previous Nuku-Nuku I reviewed and raised my appreciation of the OVA.

The problem with the TV version is that... they changed pretty much everything! Nuku-Nuku is still a cat-brained androbot. And she still lives with Ryounosuke's family. But that's where the similarities end. Gone are the fights between Kyousaku and Akiko (Ryounosuke's parents). Well actually, they are not "gone" per-se, it's just that they don't know they are fighting each other, because they now have alternate superhero style personas... I mean.. what?!? Akiko is not even the head of Mishima anymore, merely a "vice-president" if you will. It is so different from the original OVA that in the opening of each show, Nuku-Nuku explains how she used to be a cat that was transformed into a cat brain androbot and that the show is the awesome story of her life. Right after she says that, you see Ryounosuke come up and say something like "the reality is totally different, but nevermind" while holding copies of the original OVA tapes and Manga. A nice touch, even if it is simply a Lampshade Hanging (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LampshadeHanging)

Then there's Nuku's classmates. Each and every one a full on clichéd stereotype (Pop singer who talks only in song, Occult adept who sees bad omens in everything, Nihilistic pretty boy, Egocentric rich snob spoiled brat along with the twin yes-girls at her side, the bookworm who never speaks, even a junior mad-scientist and a militaristic displinary class lead).. which would work in the context of the show, seeing as it's still a way over-the-top comedy show. The problem is they are over-used, and becoming all too repetitive and predictable as the show goes on.

Most of the comedy is slapstick humour and revolves around Nuku-Nuku's adaptation in "human society", her being cat brained and all. Thing is, like I said previously in my Pink Panther review (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,741.msg73935.html#msg73935), slpastick is inherently limited in the range of things it can do before starting to feel redundant and repetitive. So what do you think happens with a 14 episodes show? They creative team does get a few nice flashes along the way, but the episodes themselves are still quite formulaic and become a bit too repetitive. I may have noticed it more because of watching the show on DVD, instead of once a week on TV. Still, it's a negative.

But like I said above, despite all that, I still loved the show more than I should have. I found it entertaining and very funny at times. Every character gets his "shining moment" and I liked them all. So while I did like it, there's plenty of other stuff I'd recommend over that to anyone getting into anime, starting with the original OVA! But it was good for what it was.

Rating:

Wow, I used way more words than I should have for this show hehehe
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 24, 2009, 05:49:01 PM
   All Purpose Cultural Cat Girl Nuku Nuku Dash!: Complete Collection
   
            
Original Title: Bannou Bunka Nekomusume Dash!
Year: 1998
Country: Japan
Director: Yoshitaka Fujimoto
Rating: TV-PG
Length: 14x 30min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: English, Japanese
Subtitles: English

         

     



What they say
Ryunosuke Natsume has no idea his household helper is really the super sexy hero Cat Girl Nuku Nuku, he just feels lucky to have the lovely girl so close.

Nuku on the other hand, while trying to take care of her newly adopted family, battles with the temper of Ryunosuke's mother, Nuku's lost memories and the evil that lurks inside Mishima, the most powerful company in Maneki City!

As Mishima unleashes new and more terrorizing weapons in an attempt to take down Nuku, placing Maneki City in a clear and present danger, Nuku faces the ultimate choice - save herself or the people she loves!

My Thoughts
Well! They might've just dropped the Nuku-Nuku name. Nothing is the same this time around. Ryunosuke is now older and doesn't know about Nuku Nuku being an android, which of course means they had to make him fall in love with her. Ryunosuke's father is no longer Nuku Nuku's creator. Nuku Nuku herself has also changed. She now sports blonde hair, and has an alternate costume when she unleashes her android powers. I could go on and on with the changes...

But, the biggest change of all is the tone of the series. It's like they tried to make a serious series out of something that just can't be serious at all (cat brain in an android anyone?)

The result is a mixed bag. Sometimes it's great, but it also falls flat on its face quite a few times too.

So, final verdict? I say watch the OVA, then, if you really like it, try the TV series. If you like that, then move on to Dash. Just keep in mind that it's a totally different universe.

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 24, 2009, 06:01:44 PM
   Battlestar Galactica: Season 4.5
   
 
         
Original Title: Battlestar Galactica
Year: 2009
Country: United States
Director: Various
Rating: 14A
Length: 763 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78:1
Audio: English
Subtitles: English, Spanish

      

   


What they say
All will be revealed as teh thrilling final episodes of Battlestar Galactica 4.3 land on DVD. From their initial action-packed battles against the Cylons to their desperate attempts to find the fabled 13th colony, Earth, a determined band of human survivors has captivated audiences everywhere with their desperate quest to find a new home for their dwindling numbers. Join them now as the fleet journeys into the furthest reaches of unexplored space and faces a crucial decision that will change all of their lives irrevocably. Presented uninterrupted in Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound, this epic 4-discs set contains ever 10 hours of intense, groundbreaking DVD features, including extended episodes that never aired - a must-own addition to every fan's collection. Relive the anticpation, the action and the excitement of this groundbreaking series that is destined to live on as "one of the best dramas on TV" (Time Magazine).

My Thoughts
Wow. Just wow. This series hasn't disappointed me since the beginning. Sure, they've hit some roadblocks, mostly during S3, but they got around them and delivered an awesome new take of this series.

Season 4.5 had a lot of strong points going for it. Even some big surprises.

(click to show/hide)

I can't wait to dive again, and rewatch the whole series, knowing in advance what is coming and see if any clues were left throughout the series!

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: goodguy on August 25, 2009, 01:25:09 AM
Battlestar Galactica: Season 4.5

I just got mine and peeked into it a little. "What the frak is going on with BSG" is probably one of the funniest (and longest) recaps I have ever seen.

Not so funny: my Disc 2 seems to be defective, so I'm not sure if I can watch it soon.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 25, 2009, 03:25:04 AM
Battlestar Galactica: Season 4.5

I just got mine and peeked into it a little. "What the frak is going on with BSG" is probably one of the funniest (and longest) recaps I have ever seen.

Yeah, I love the little "color commentaries" the narrator keeps putting in  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 23, 2009, 05:25:41 AM
You know it's funny how when I watch a TV series or an Anime series, I almost never watch the opening sequence. I watch it once with the first episode and then skip over them in subsequent episodes.

Lately, I've been watching Galaxy Angel (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_angel), and starting with Galaxy Angel AA, something odd happened. I like the opening sequence AND the closing sequence enough to actually watch them.. every single time! I love both songs and the animation! So odd for me..

So, if you're curious, here they are:
Opening


Ending


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 29, 2009, 06:37:21 AM
   Galaxy Angel
   
 
         
Original Title: Galaxy Angel
Year: 2001
Country: Japan
Directors:
  • Morio Asaka & Yoshimitsu Ohashi (Galaxy Angel & Z)
  • Shigehito Takayanagi (Galaxy Angel A, AA, S & X)
Rating: TV-14
Length: 127 x 12min.
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Audio: Japanese, English
Subtitles: English

      

     


What they say
Milfeulle Sakuraba is the newest member of the Angel Brigade, a branch of the Transvaal Empire military whose primary mission is to search for relics known as ‘Lost Technology’. The only problem is…no one actually knows what the Lost Technology is! Relegated to performing menial tasks of the highest priorities: a search for lost kittens, defusing of a talking missile, and delivering an old school I.D – The Angel Brigade’s here to save the galaxy…one planet at a time!

My Thoughts
What a crazy show! It's like we've created a bunch of characters and a world to put them in, now, let's have fun, and do whatever the hell we want with them! And that's literally what happens. Stuff that happens in previous episodes don't mean squat in the following one (not as obvious in the first series, but becomes more and more obvious in later ones). Some episodes end with various members of the Galaxy Angel brigade dead or MIA, yet int he next they are back with no mention of their whereabouts. Usually, I don't like that kind of stuff. I prefer when a series in a long story, and each episode comes and expands on it. I don't necessarily mean to continue a single long story, but at least to acknowledge things that happened before. In Galaxy Angel, it's like each episode takes places in its own little dimension.

But somehow, I like the show a lot. The characters are fun. They all have their quirk and oddities, and they complement each other nicely. The situations they put the Angels in are completely out of this world, and most of the time do not follow any logic, and yet, there's something to love the show. It's so cute and funny! I just couldn't stop watching. I had to watch the next episode, and the next, and the next ...

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 10, 2009, 06:44:33 AM
The Insatiable
 
What they say
Harry Balbo (Flanery), a shy salesman, is on his way home one night when he witnesses Tatiana, a female vampire (Ayanna) violently rip the head off her victim. When no one believes his story, Harry decides to build a large cage in his cellar to trap the bloodthirsty killer. Using himself as bait, Harry tricks Tatiana into the cage and imprisons her. But with no source of fresh blood, the strikingly beautiful vampire faces sure death. Not wanting to kill such a remarkable creature, but unable to release a ravenous vampire onto the city streets, Harry is faced with an impossible choice -- give in to her seductive powers or save innocent lives from a gruesome fate.
My Thoughts
I must admit, I bought this movie solely for Charlotte Ayanna (http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=charlotte+ayanna&FORM=BIFD). I completely fell under her charms when I first watched Training Day (she plays Ethan Hawke's companion). Those eyes..

So basically, when I stumbled upon this while browsing some DVD shop inventory, I couldn't resist. I didn't read anything about the movie, just the cover blurb you see above. So I knew it involved Vampires and that's about it.

But, I didn't expect this.

Turns out, it does involve a vampire. It does have killings. It does have blood and gore. But, it's basically a love story, for better or worse.

I like the somewhat of a twist of a normal guy falling in love with a vampire, but it's a bit much. And the whole movie holds together on too many impossibilities. One of the most glaring one being that a run-of-the-mill, white collar, office worker can learn how to weld from a book in a single day, and that very same night build a steel cage strong enough to hold a vampire that can easily jump 3-stories high? Yeah...

But somehow, I still liked the movie. In no small part thanks to Charlotte Ayanna. I think she played the seducteress vampire perfectly. The guy playing the run-of-the-mill white collar worker is pretty good too. And they happen to have decent chemistry, which helps.

I would say The Insatiable is an entertaining little movie. Just be prepared to take some leaps of logic at times, and do not expect a lot of action.
Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 11, 2009, 03:03:27 AM
Friday the 13th
 
What they say
Terror and suspense abound in this 24-hour nightmare of blood. Camp Crystal Lake has been been shuttered for over 20 years due to several vicious and unsolved murders. The camp's new owner and several young counselors are readying the property for re-opening despite warnings of a "death curse" by local residents. The curse proves true on Friday the 13th as one by one each of the counselors is stalked by a violent killer.This film is widely acclaimed for its horrifying and creative murder sequences.
My Thoughts
Suspense? Where? They don't take the time to build the suspense. All they do is to have the story make the kids get isolated, only to be promptly killed, without much build up. The movie gets so easily predictable because of it (not that there's a whole lot of unknown to begin with in a slasher movie). But, the movie does get interesting once the killer is revealed. Then you actually get the cat and mouse chase that finally builds up some tension.

Maybe I did go into the movie with too much expectation. After all, it is the "classic" that spawned a whole franchise and defined a genre. But I'm a bit disappointed by it, I was expecting more. I did enjoy it, that's not the problem, but it didn't tick the way I hoped it would. Maybe it'll click with one of the sequels. We'll see.
Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 11, 2009, 12:23:58 PM
I feel exactly the same. How it even got to one sequel I will never understand, especially as the iconic form of Jason didn't appear until part 3...  :shrug:

Normally I avoid remakes, but I've got it at the back of my mind to give the new one a chance. It can't be much worse and you can rely on modern producers to cut to the chase quicker at least! :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 12, 2009, 05:30:24 AM
I feel exactly the same. How it even got to one sequel I will never understand, especially as the iconic form of Jason didn't appear until part 3...  :shrug:

That one's easy to answer. According to IMDb: "The film made $39,754,601 and had a budget of $550,000."


Normally I avoid remakes, but I've got it at the back of my mind to give the new one a chance. It can't be much worse and you can rely on modern producers to cut to the chase quicker at least! :laugh:

I'm with you on that. Somehow, the movie would probably benefit from cutting to the chase and getting Jason into full-on Jason outfit as fast as possible.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 12, 2009, 05:37:06 AM
FRIDAY THE 13TH - PART 2
 
WHAT THEY SAY
Just when you thought it was safe to go back to camp... here's even more heart-pounding terror.

Five years after the horrible blood bath at Camp Crystal Lake, all that remains is the legend of Jason Voorhees and his demented mother, who had murdered seven camp counselors. At the nearby summer camp, the new counselors are unconcerned about the warnings to stay away from the infamous site. Carefree, the young people roam the area, not sensing the ominous lurking presence. One by one, they are attacked and brutally slaughtered. Suspense and screams abound in this compelling thriller.

MY THOUGHTS
Well, I think Part 2 us an improvement on the first. At least, this time around, they do show the killer moving around, stalking its prey. And I must say, Ginny makes a more believable victim than Alice did. I do hope they show some more creativity with the killings down the line, because if they stick with the machete hack'n'slash killings, it's getting old already.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 12, 2009, 06:07:37 AM
This is my favorite in the series, but I really like Amy Steel (sadly her career was more in tv figuration, but she's the only good thing in April Fool's Day an horror film that I don't recommend at all). The fact that it's the only film where Jason act like an human being and not like an unstopable killing machine make the movie better. Sadly the rest of the serie is mostly parody and eyes candy. Not that I've something against the last one when we talk of Judie Aronson, Debi Sue Voorhees, Darcy DeMoss, Elizabeth Kaitan or Erin Gray ;) 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on October 12, 2009, 01:22:23 PM
I feel exactly the same. How it even got to one sequel I will never understand, especially as the iconic form of Jason didn't appear until part 3...  :shrug:

Normally I avoid remakes, but I've got it at the back of my mind to give the new one a chance. It can't be much worse and you can rely on modern producers to cut to the chase quicker at least! :laugh:

 :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 14, 2009, 04:29:02 PM
FRIDAY THE 13TH - PART 3
 
WHAT THEY SAY
A idyllic summer turns into a nightmare of unspeakable terror for yet another group of naïve counselors. Ignoring Camp Crystal Lake's bloody legacy, one by one they fall victim to the maniacal Jason who stalks them at every turn...

Friday The 13th, Part 3 will have you frozen with fear, as Jason finds his way into your living room!

MY THOUGHTS
Somehow, this Part 3 is my favorite so far. Sure, it pretty much mimics Part 1, but the fact Jason finally gets his iconic goalie mask just made me giddy. I'm a bit disappointed in how the mask enters the picture. I mean, it is so iconic nowadays, but back then, it was probably just a small joke to have Jason cover his face with the hockey mask. One positive that comes from the hockey mask is that they finally show Jason stalking more.

One gripe I'm having about the movies though, and I don't know if it is because they are cut to get a certain rating or if that's really how the director wanted it, but they don't show the kills enough. You'll barely see the knife, harpoon, machete and/or axe penetrate the victim, and then it'll cut to a wide angle shot or a shot of Jason walking away. Where's the blood? Where are the gruesome entrails spilling out? It's a horror movie damn it! Where's my gore? Because let's be honest, this movie isn't exactly oozing with suspense or even scares, it's all about the killings. But killings without gore?

I still found the movie entertaining though. I like that they showed Jason more than before, and I hope they keep showing him more and more. He's the star after all. And they are showing some variety with the kills!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on October 14, 2009, 08:39:00 PM
I love the Friday the 13th movies, Well... not the later ones, but the original few are really great!

I was not a fan of the recent remake though.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 15, 2009, 05:07:30 AM
FRIDAY THE 13TH: THE FINAL CHAPTER
 
WHAT THEY SAY
The body count continues in this vivid thriller, the fourth – but not final – story in the widely successful Friday The 13th series. Jason, Crystal Lake's least popular citizen, returns to wreak further havoc in Friday The 13th – The Final Chapter. After his revival in a hospital morgue, the hockey-masked murderer fixes his vengeful attention on the Jarvis family and a group of hitherto carefree teenagers. Young Tommy Jarvis is an aficionado of horror films with special talent for masks and make-up. Has the diabolical Jason finally met his match?

MY THOUGHTS
What's to say? Same old, same old. This is getting quite formulaic. Are they just reusing the same script over and over, just changing the actors and place? This fourth installment is no better or worse than its predecessor.

There's one thing though. I can't shake the feeling that they should just reduce the body count (it's at 13 in this one!) and take more time! I always find the last 15-20 minutes to be the best in each movie. And oh what a coincidence, it's always Jason chasing the final victim! Why don't they just reduce the body count, and have more toying by Jason with the victims? Just that simple thing, for me would make the movie that much better.

At least, this time around, the gore is amped up a bit. Which is good. I do think Friday the 13th has good entertainment value, I just wish they'd be a little more devious with the stalking and killing.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 15, 2009, 08:06:00 AM
Corey Feldman is so annoying that even with the twins, Judie Aronson, Kimberly Beck and Crispin Glover this film is my least favorite in the serie. The stupid Jason VS Freddy is even better just because Corey Feldman isn't there...

Never understand why this kid was supposed to be talented. He is just an overacting annoying kid and teenager in everything he had done :thumbdown:      

Glad to see that he had fall even below than the reality TV has-been status. NSFBSK untalented idiot :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 15, 2009, 08:24:09 AM
Stand By Me? Goonies? Lost Boys? He was a good actor, Jimmy...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 15, 2009, 08:59:39 AM
I didn't like The Goonies when it was released and not more when I've seen it on tv last year.
I like Stand by Me but certainly not because of him. Wil Wheaton, River Phoenix (he was an awesome actor) and Jerry O'Connell are the reasons to watch this great adaptation of Stephen King.
Lost Boys is a good film, but because of his part the film is only good and not great (when I watch an horror film I don't want to watch a kid movie)   
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 15, 2009, 11:47:10 AM
I didn't like The Goonies when it was released and not more when I've seen it on tv last year.
I like Stand by Me but certainly not because of him. Wil Wheaton, River Phoenix (he was an awesome actor) and Jerry O'Connell are the reasons to watch this great adaptation of Stephen King.
Lost Boys is a good film, but because of his part the film is only good and not great (when I watch an horror film I don't want to watch a kid movie)   

Lost Boys was brilliant because of The Frog Brothers! And I can't imagine Stand By Me without any of the kids. I think you're picking on him!  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 20, 2009, 04:50:28 AM
Friday the 13th - Part V: A New Beginning
 
WHAT THEY SAY
Jason is back, hockey mask and all. And he's up to his old maniacal tricks in Friday The 13th Part V – A New Beginning.. This time he seems to have set his sights on the young patients at a secluded halfway house. And more than a few of his teen targets end up in half, in quarters... you name it, Jason does it.

This is the fifth scary installment in the Friday The 13th saga. If you liked the first four, and think you're up to getting back on Jason's bloody trail, you'll love Friday The 13th Part V – A New Beginning.

MY THOUGHTS
Well the series is starting to feel a bit redundant here. It also reeks of studio involvement/director sellout. I mean, it's worse than an Agatha Christie novel! Always the same plot, just a different setting!

They did try to mix things up a bit, but boy did it fall flat on its face and I can't even think of a single reasoning how they thought, even for a mere second, that it would work and that fans would still like it! (well, I guess fans did like it enough.. after all, there's still 5 movies (6 if you count the Freddy crossover, 7 with the remake) to go!

(click to show/hide)

I can pretty much sum up my feeling for this installment with a single onomatopoeia (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/onomatopoeia): meh!

Is it me who is different? I mean, you could do a "Friday the 13th" in 60 seconds very easily. Line up 10 teenagers, have them each say their name, then have random sex, because we all know you need boobs to sell a horror movie. Then have Jason kill each of them from behind, one after another, in rapid succession. Have the last person finally notice what's going on, pull a knife and drive it into Jason's head. Cut to mental institute, add quick dream sequence of imaginary Jason attacking. Voila! Friday the 13th in 60 seconds!

(click to show/hide)

But then, that's me being a bit harsh. It did keep me entertained. It's just gotten to a point where the movie is just too predictable. But I give it points for having an actress who actually bears the name Voorhees: Debi Sue Voorhees who plays Tina. And she's incredibly beautiful! And we get to see her naked!  :thumbup:
RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 26, 2009, 02:14:51 AM
Friday the 13th - Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan
 
WHAT THEY SAY
The Big Apple's in big trouble, as indestructible psycho-fiend Jason Voorhees hits the road to New York City -- and paints the town "red."

After a shocking return from beyond the grave, the diabolical Jason ships out aboard a teen filled "love boat" bound for New York, which he soon transforms into the ultimate voyage of the damned. Then one of his terrified victims escapes into the nightmarish maze of Manhattan's subways and sewers, only to confront Jason one final time.

MY THOUGHTS
The movie was fine. I liked it. Although with the title, I wish they'd have spent more time in NY. I was hoping to see Jason go haywire into NY. What I got is a very single minded killer, going after a very specific bunch of people. But, they're finally doing it. They're showing Jason more. I just wish they hadn't changed the Jason makeup. I wish they had made it a evolution of the previous one, instead to pretty much completely changing it.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 26, 2009, 05:51:19 AM
Where are the part 6 and 7 :whistle:

Those 2 are certainly better than Jason Vancouver Cruise Vacation :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 26, 2009, 05:55:47 AM
Hahahaha! Oops! I forgot to post the reviews for those.. I'll do them tomorrow, along with Jason Goes To Hell
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 26, 2009, 06:50:46 AM
Friday the 13th - Part VI: Jason Lives
 
WHAT THEY SAY
As a child, Tommy Jarvis did what many other died trying to do. He killed Jason Vorhees, the mass murderer who terrorized the residents of Crystal Lake. But now, years later, Tommy is tormented by the fear that maybe Jason isn't really dead.

So Tommy and a friend go to the cemetery to dig up Jason's grave. Unfortunately for Tommy, (and very unfortunately for his friend), instead of finding a rotting corpse, they discover a well rested Jason who comes back from the dead for another bloody rampage in Friday The 13th, Part VI: Jason Lives.

MY THOUGHTS
Now that's the Jason I know and heard so much about! Jason in full, supernatural, bad ass mode! I also like the self referential inside jokes. For some reason, I like this new, more powerful Jason. He's got a more menacing presence. They also show him more, with helps build tension. I found this installment pretty good.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 26, 2009, 06:59:15 AM
Friday the 13th - Part VII: The New Blood
 
WHAT THEY SAY

Ever since homicidal maniac Jason Voorhees got trapped in chains at the bottom of Crystal Lake, the nearby summer camp has operated without a hitch... without a murder. But one of this season's happy campers has brought along a deadly secret.

Tina Shepherd can see the future and levitate objects. Her doctor knows just how dangerous telekinesis can be, but he's out to exploit her, not help her. And now it's too late. Tina has accidentally unchained Jason from his watery grave and the bloodbath is underway.

Tina's special powers are her only hope for survival. But what chance does a teenage girl have against an axe-wielding maniac?

MY THOUGHTS
This is probably my favorite entry in the Friday the 13th saga. Finally, to a certain extent, Jason meets his match! Sure, a girl with telekinesis is a bit over the top, but, I found it made good a good story. The showdown between Tina and Jason is very interesting, because Jason has a worthy adversary, someone who can actually hurt him. Ultimately, she can't obliterate him, but she still gives him a fight.

This also marks the beginning of Kane Hodder's tenure has Jason, and I found he did a very good job at giving Jason the imposing stature, presence and even show his relentless anger towards everything.

I also really like Jason's look in this movie. He looks battered, ribs poking out, flesh rotting away revealing his bones here and there. He looks nasty, but it fits with the timeline of the movies, and I liked that!

(click to show/hide)
RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 26, 2009, 07:08:07 AM
Jason Goes to Hell: The Final Friday
 
WHAT THEY SAY
Jason Voorhees, the living, breathing essence of evil, is back for another fierce fling. Tracked down and blown to bits by a special FBI task force, everyone now assumes that he's finally dead. But everybody assumes wrong. Jason has been reborn with the bone-chilling ability to assume the identity of anyone he touches. The terrifying truth is he could be anywhere. Or anybody.

In this shocking, bloody soaked installment to Jason's carnage-ridden reign of terror, the secret of his unstoppable killing instinct is finally revealed. And one you know the chilling facts, you'll see him in your nightmares. And he'll see you in hell!

MY THOUGHTS
Three words: What .... the .... Hell !! (no pun intended)

What have they done? Talk about ruining a character and undermining a whole series of film! See that thing coming out of Jason' eye on the cover? Yeah, it's in the movie!

(click to show/hide)

What were they thinking? It makes the rest of the series make no sense at all!

(click to show/hide)

Ugh!! I can't even put into words my disgust for this movie. Sure, it's got some decent special effects, it more recent after all, the whole story is so silly and disconnected from it all, it's not even funny!

There's a thread over at Invelos about which movie you want to burn and throw away right now? I guess this is it!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on October 26, 2009, 08:28:30 AM
Hmm, When I watched Jason goes to Hell I kept thinking "this is going to get better right?" :/ wrong. very wrong.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on October 26, 2009, 01:13:07 PM
I can deal with (and even somewhat enjoy) Jason Goes to Hell... but it has to be my least favorite.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 26, 2009, 04:52:29 PM
I'm probably the only one who like this film, my favorite after the part 2. It's the only one I've seen in the theatre and I was the only one not angry watching it in the theatre.

It was a refreshing take on the serie, sure it's fun but honestly it's the same movie over and over in each sequel. Too bad the next one was a return to the old formula again...

How is it possible to not like a movie with Erin Gray? Even Silver Spoon was watchable on TV just because of her 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 26, 2009, 05:10:20 PM
I'm not saying the movie is not watchable..... Well.... Yeah I am!

But, there are parts of the movie I like. Had the bad guy in this been a whole new bad guy, instead of Jason, I would've liked the movie.

(click to show/hide)

Another thing going against this movie is the sound mix. It is SOO bad! One of the worst I've ever had the displeasure of listening to! The music is constantly overpowering the sound effects, you can barely hear people talk because even if you crank up the volume, the music gets so loud you can't hear anything else! And what's with having a 5.1 mix, with music solely in the back channels? Ugh!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 29, 2009, 05:52:40 AM
Jason X
 
WHAT THEY SAY
If you're looking for terror, here comes a perfect ten. In the year 2455, on a routine training mission, a team of students is about to learn a terrifying lesson. Through the years, Jason Vorhees has claimed over 200 victims. Now, the legendary killer from Crystal Lake is back, hurtling through space and hunting new prey. Jason X is a nerve-shredding thriller loaded with spectacular special effects, hi-tech weapons, and new ways to die.

MY THOUGHTS
What a fun romp!

Jason is back as his usual unrelenting killing machine self, and that's how I like it! The whole freeze and wake up in the future felt completely unnecessary, other then setting the stage for giving the movie an Alien-ish feel. Which isn't too bad, but it's clearly a weak attempt at it. Going to the future is probably also the only way they found to make "Uber-Jason".. Which I liked by the way, for some reason! It's still better than what they did in "Jason Goes to Hell"! In my opinion anyway.. Though I do find it quite convenient that the nano-machines would activate just like that, out of the blue.

So yeah, I thought it was a fun movie. Totally over the top, not taking itself seriously at all, and I thought it worked. Just don't go into expecting horror. This an action comedy, at best, with some gore. Some of the deaths are actually very gruesome.

Kane Hodder reprising the role of Jason is a good move. I like him in the role. Like I said before, he brings a presence. And for a character that doesn't talk, he manages to give Jason some sort of "personality", some purpose.

But...

Jason has hair now?? Seriously! They had the look of Jason down so well in parts 7 and 8.. Why did they have to break all that in Goes to Hell and X?? Oh well..

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 02, 2009, 01:16:54 AM
Freddy vs. Jason
 
WHAT THEY SAY
The Ultimate Battle of Evil vs. Evil

Freddy Krueger is in hell - literally! And like an inmate with a life sentence, Freddy's been plotting a fantastic revenge...all he needs is a little help. In comes Jason Vorhees, the equally iconic madman and perfect means for Freddy to once again instil fear on Elm Street. As the bodies begin to pile up, it becomes clear that Jason isn't willing to step aside.

Now, with a terrified town in the middle, the two titans of terror enter into a horrifying and gruesome showdown. Winner kills all.

MY THOUGHTS
Like you probably, I just discovered the Friday the 13th franchise this year. But, I've loved Nightmare on Elm Street for a long time. Combining the two is brilliant. I will not say the movie is perfect, but I do think it's a fun movie. I luke how they left the ending ambiguous enough to let both camp argue about "Who won?". It's a fun movie, though I wish both protagonists had been feature a bit more. They kids are there too much. Nevertheless, it's a fun movie that I gladly revisit every once in a while.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 02, 2009, 01:27:48 AM
WALL-E
 
WHAT THEY SAY
The highly acclaimed director of Fiding Nemo and the creative storytellers behind Cars and Ratatouille transport you to a galaxy not far away for a new cosmic comedy adventure about a determined robot named WALL·E.

After hundreds of lonely years of doing what he was built for, the curious and lovable WALL·E discovers a new purpose in life when he meets a sleek search robot named EVE. Join them and a hilarious cast of characters on a fantastic journey across the universe.

Transport yourself to a fascinating new world with Disney·Pixar's latest adventure, now even more astonishing on DVD and loaded with bonus features, including the exclusive animated short film BURN·E. WALL·E is a film your family will want to enjoy over and over again.

MY THOUGHTS
What a marvelous movie! Entirely deserving of all the praise it got. It is actually incredible how Pixar can get so much emotions through, even when the characters don't speak. Prime examples here are Wall-E, EVE and that cleaning robot. But if you go back in the history of Pixar, just look at their Luxo short. It's a lamp! But just the way it moves, and you understand everything you have to. And they just keep perfectionning their technique. It's astounding how Pixar can keep churning out winners after winners. The guys love their craft and it shows.

I loved every minute of Wall-E! It's such a nice story and it is told so well. So many little things add up to create a whole. Just the dancing sequence. It is so pretty to look at, and it holds so much meaning for Wall-E, him who evolved for so long, alone, on a desolate Earth, listening to dancing numbers from musicals!

Watch this movie. It is well worth it. It is top notch cinema. Too bad so many artists lost their way and are now churning out money grabbers these days.. Thank God Pixar is still around with their care and love of cinema.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 03, 2009, 04:01:19 AM
Ratatouille
WHAT THEY SAY
From the creators of Cars and The Incredibles comes a breakthrough comedy with something for everyone. With delightful new characters, experience Paris from an all-new perspective. It's "terrific moviemaking!" raves Leonard Maltin of Entertainment Tonight.

In one of Paris' finest restaurants, Remy, a determined young rat, dreams of becoming a renowned French chef. Torn between his family's wishes and his true calling, Remy and his pal Linguini set in motion a hilarious chain of events that turns the City of Lights upside down.

Ratatouille is a treat you'll want to enjoy again and again.

MY THOUGHTS
And another winner by Pixar. It's a good little story. I did find the whole Remy controlling Linguini to be going a bit far, but it's a kid story again so you have to hhave some magic in there! ;)

The animation is, as usual, top notch. Some expressions on the characters are priceless. The movie almost would make you accept to have rats in your kitchen!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 03, 2009, 09:29:15 AM
I know everybody absolutely loves Wall-e but I thought it was very boring and annoying.

I realise the begging was supposed to be universal, but come one, all he does is walk around a rubbish dump for at least 10 minutes... Maybe its because sometimes I have a terribly low attention span, and I was annoyed at the film anyway. I bought the "Special Edition" that comes in the crapyest card board case Ive ever seen. I can see what people like about the film its cute, but it is no way the film I was led to believe it was

Here is another problem I have with it  :tease:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on November 03, 2009, 11:55:32 AM
(click to show/hide)

Emma I am an avid PIXAR fan to the extent that it is my dream to someday work there but I agree with you on this one. I loved WALL-E to no end as a film but this also annoyed me. I hope the studio doesn't do it again.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 03, 2009, 03:06:07 PM
How can you deny Fred Willard anything? He's great! And Wall-E was mervellous, but check out the reviews on here and you'll find a friend in Rich.

He doesn't know what he's talking about either...  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 03, 2009, 04:20:01 PM
I don't know, somehow, I thought it was fitting to have the BnL ads be live action. In the same way that we have car ads that are completely CGI and cereal ads with animated characters, I thought it fitting that an animated world would have live action ads (just don't think too much about how that would be possible!)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 03, 2009, 06:07:59 PM
I love Fred Willard! I love him in Best in Show and Anchorman especially.

I can see that people, like the how ironic the adverts are, but I thought they were out of place, and were not needed ;P also, my favourite band Barenaked Ladies, uses BNL and everytime I saw BnL in the film I thought of them, and was sad they weren't in it XD

As for Pixar, I think they have made a few mistakes! they are overrated XD (im using it again!) I didn't enjoy anything between Toys Story 2 and Up. Even Finding Nemo did not feel right to me! whilst Nemo and Ratatouille are better then Cars, Incredibles and Wall-e though.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 03, 2009, 08:29:13 PM
You should save a few "overrated"s or you'll run out!  :P Actually, it's a moot point because they simply can't be overrated. You don't have to like them, but just take a step back and look at them in context and The Incredibles is some way ahead of its time and Ratatouille is a work of genius. I was blown away by both that and Wall-E. Pixar aren't perfect (who is?), but I've said it before and I'll say it again: Pixar are the best and most important American studio producing today. Especially with the near-demise of Miramax leaving indie somewhat in the cold.

Overrated, my ar.... :-X
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 03, 2009, 08:55:25 PM
Lol, animation wise id say they are the most important western company, but ;P they need to be careful,  they get alot of praise. Often over praising something causes problems ;P I don't think anything beat Toy Story until Up... But, this new film Newt looks strange, kid of rushed... maybe thats Disenys hold on them ;P who knows? after all... Bolt was pretty much a pixar film
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on November 03, 2009, 11:31:01 PM
Quote
As for Pixar, I think they have made a few mistakes! they are overrated XD


Ghibli, PIXAR, Disney. Gee Emma it seems none of the animation studios are up to your standards. Do you like any of them at all?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on November 04, 2009, 05:27:40 AM
Lol, animation wise id say they are the most important western company, but ;P they need to be careful,  they get alot of praise. Often over praising something causes problems ;P I don't think anything beat Toy Story until Up... But, this new film Newt looks strange, kid of rushed... maybe thats Disenys hold on them ;P who knows? after all... Bolt was pretty much a pixar film
Yes, Pixar will eventually fail. It's nature. We'll see it when it happens. But so far even their bad films are better than most others.

As for your comment on Newt: it's mainly a feeling I had with most Pixar films... A film about fish...? A film about talking cars? A film about a cooking rat? Are they nuts? But they always pulled though and even the ones that seemed weird at first turned out much better than expected.

My favorites are Toy Story, The Incredibles and Wall-E (the latter two I liked ever since seeing the first trailers).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 04, 2009, 10:38:28 AM
Quote
As for Pixar, I think they have made a few mistakes! they are overrated XD


Ghibli, PIXAR, Disney. Gee Emma it seems none of the animation studios are up to your standards. Do you like any of them at all?

I love Pixar, and Ive been studying Disney for 5 years, I write essays about Disney frequently off my own back for many college publications. I love Disney, BUT they are overrated, many things are overrated and it crosses into many places film wise.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 04, 2009, 10:40:21 AM
Lol, animation wise id say they are the most important western company, but ;P they need to be careful,  they get alot of praise. Often over praising something causes problems ;P I don't think anything beat Toy Story until Up... But, this new film Newt looks strange, kid of rushed... maybe thats Disenys hold on them ;P who knows? after all... Bolt was pretty much a pixar film
Yes, Pixar will eventually fail. It's nature. We'll see it when it happens. But so far even their bad films are better than most others.

As for your comment on Newt: it's mainly a feeling I had with most Pixar films... A film about fish...? A film about talking cars? A film about a cooking rat? Are they nuts? But they always pulled though and even the ones that seemed weird at first turned out much better than expected.

My favorites are Toy Story, The Incredibles and Wall-E (the latter two I liked ever since seeing the first trailers).

I agree and I will see what happens when its released, but... I think subjectively, and I say subjectively because I feel people are telling me im wrong for disliking pixar films :p I dislike certain films they have released, because they didn't seem right. To me, I did not enjoy them.

So now, for the sake of all that is holy, lets move past this animation argument ¬_¬
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on November 04, 2009, 12:16:40 PM
I just want to add my thoughts  - better late than never - or maybe not! :laugh: I have never taken a course in movies or anything related to film. I base my opinions coming from an outsiders point of view. For example, I would probably lump Anime and Animation into the same category although, after reading these forums, I can understand there are vast differences. And, although I own several Anime DVDs - I haven't yet watched them. That being said...

I like a movie for what it does to me - how it makes me feel. What does it do for me physically, mentally or emotionally? For the most part the movies you have discussed all do one thing for me - they make me feel happy. Even thinking about the lamp in Pixar brings a smile to my face.

I loved every one of the movies that have been discussed. I watched many of the Disney ones ever since I was a child. And yes, I saw many of them in the cinema many, many years ago. Mary Poppins, which my grandmother took me to, remains one of my favorite films of all time. Yes, I know that Dick Van Dyke's accent is, let's say not the best, but I don't care. I love him in it!

It might be that animated films were something I couldn't wait for when I was growing up. Animated films, to me, are just something special. Walt Disney was a pioneer. He brought to TV and film something so different and new I couldn't wait to see what it was. Even now, looking back, I am grateful to him for his genius.  I even like the music in the Disney films (sorry Pete!). I could mention dozens of Disney songs that I adore - Pinocchio's "When You Wish Upon A Star" still gives me goosebumps.

And the characters - love them! They become real to me. I care about them. I still get a lump in my throat when Bambi's or Nemo's mothers die. These type of movies, to me, can never be overrated. I watch them over and over and never tire of them. Well, let me qualify that -after watching Wall-E a dozen or more times in a row with my niece and nephews, I did get a little sick of it. But, after a few months, I watched it again and what happened? I was happy.

In a way I am grateful that I never learned about the technical aspects of film making. I don't want to think and analyze animated films, I just want to enjoy them. I want to go away humming their songs with a smile on my face.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 04, 2009, 01:59:55 PM
In a way I am grateful that I never learned about the technical aspects of film making. I don't want to think and analyze animated films, I just want to enjoy them. I want to go away humming their songs with a smile on my face.

 :thumbup:

Completely agree. I can understand some people like arguing the technical aspects of movies, but I so often feel like they are missing the point because they concentrate on the technical, instead of letting the movie work its magic.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on November 04, 2009, 02:47:58 PM
In a way I am grateful that I never learned about the technical aspects of film making. I don't want to think and analyze animated films, I just want to enjoy them. I want to go away humming their songs with a smile on my face.

 :thumbup:

Completely agree. I can understand some people like arguing the technical aspects of movies, but I so often feel like they are missing the point because they concentrate on the technical, instead of letting the movie work its magic.
I want to agree too! I have read some many books about the technical aspects and watched so many special features laserdiscs and DVDs that now this knowledge often stands between me and the enjoyment of, or at least immersion in, a movie.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 04, 2009, 05:17:46 PM
I tend to try to ignore my education when I watch a film although, sadly I notice bad cuts more then anything, when a scene changes to another quickly i notice it, However, I tend to watch a film based on the story, not actors, music, genre whatever. I like to watch a wide variety of films.

Whilst i can agree that having an technical education can change the way you see things I can also say its not as bad as you think :p I can still appreciate a film with bad voice acting! heck I love Mary Poppins regardless of Dick Van Dykes accent :p

I like to avoid over analysing a film unless I really have to, maybe thats my problem with Wall-e i couldn't see it as a film because i was looking at it as a social experiment ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on November 04, 2009, 05:18:15 PM
I agree as well... as much as I love movies I would never...ever take a class in it as I know it would do nothing but ruin my enjoyment of what I love so much.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 12, 2009, 04:03:36 PM
Starship Troopers
WHAT THEY SAY
From the bridge of the Fleet Battlestation Ticonderoga, with its sweeping galactic views, to the desolate terrain of planet Klendathu, teeming with shrieking, fire-spitting brain-sucking special effects creatures, acclaimed director PAUL VERHOVEN crafts a dazzling epic based on Robert A. Heinlein's classic sci-fi adventure.
CASPER VAN DIEN, DINA MEYER, DENISE RICHARDS, JAKE BUSEY, NEIL PATRICK HARRIS, PATRICK MULDOON, and MICHAEL IRONSIDE star as the courageous soldiers who travel to the distant and desolate Klendathu system for the ultimate showdown between the species.

MY THOUGHTS
Fun over the top science fiction. I like the little "propaganda" segments, they add a nice touch of irony to the movie. The bug effects are quite nice too! Let me guess... ILM? ....<goes off to check>..... their name is there, but they're not alone! Anyways, I liked the effects. It was also very nice to see Dr Horrible (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Horrible), along with John Danziger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_2_%28TV_series%29) and Sam Fisher (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_fisher).
(click to show/hide)

A nice popcorn flick, the way I like them!

RATING



Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 12, 2009, 04:03:47 PM
Journey to the Center of the Earth
WHAT THEY SAY
Professor Trevor Anderson (Brendan Fraser) teaches earth sciences at the university and heads the Center of Volcanic Activity. Max Anderson, Trevor's brother, built the monitoring system and placed the units around the world 10 years earlier. For some unknown reason, Max did not return, leaving behind a wife and son, Sean (Josh Hutcherson). Sean's mother leaves the teenager at Trevor's house to get some quality time with his uncle. They look at Max's copy of Journey to the Center of the Earth by Jules Verne and find a secret code. Back at the monitoring center Trevor compares the volcanic activity numbers and finds that they are exactly the same as the ones in the book. Trevor and Sean fly to Iceland to check one of the units and to see if they can find some information about where Max went. Trevor hires a beautiful mountain guide, Hannah (Anita Briem), to take them up the volcano. During an electrical storm on the volcano, they get trapped in an abandoned mine. They search for a way out of the mine and discover a wall filled with large diamonds. Unfortunately, the floor they are standing on can't hold their weight, and they fall down a volcano tube for miles and miles until they reach the center of the earth. Once there, they encounter prehistoric glow birds, flying piranha, man-eating plants, and T-Rex dinosaurs that have been extinct for millions of years. They find that they are seeing the same things that were printed in the Jules Verne book. This gave them hope that someone was able to escape from the center of the earth and return to the surface. Douglas Young (the-movie-guy)

MY THOUGHTS
It's a fun movie, but nothing too special. Quite run of the mill stuff. But, as adventure movies go, it was quite enjoyable.

I watched the standard version. I did try watching the 3D version (the movie comes with the glasses), but I can't stand it. The 3D effect doesn't work too well on a small screen, and like I've said before, the effect is not worth the color shift in the picture. Although there are a few camera angles that just don't make any sense without the 3D ;)

Consider this movie popcorn-flick territory again!

RATING




just posted these here because I use this thread as a view log.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 14, 2009, 05:13:47 AM
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
WHAT THEY SAY
The battle for Earth continues in this action-packed blockbuster from director Michael Bay and executive producer Steven Spielberg. When college-bound Sam Witwicky (Shia LaBeouf) learns the truth about the ancient origins of the Transformers, he must accept his destiny and join Optimus Prime® and Bumblebee® in their epic battle agains the Decepticons™, who have returned stronger than ever with a plan to destroy the world.

MY THOUGHTS
I don't care what anybody says: I loved it!

Oh sure, some parts are completely silly and I can't believe why someone thought it'd be "cool" (B crying? WTF!) I also didn't care with the robots "bleeding" or "losing teeth" while fighting, also why the heck do they have fog coming out of their mouth the speak?

Anyways, enough with the bad stuff, it didn't deter what the movie should be about - Robot Fights! And we do get plenty of them! I wish the camera would be a little farther away, and not shake as much.. but I loved the slowmo kills! One in particular who gets his face literally torn in halves! Way cool! They even used the SR-71 "Blackbird" as one of the robots!

I know I'm loving this movie way more than I should, after all, the whole plot is just an excuse, and in the end doesn't matter. But I can't help it, I loved it! Maybe even more than the first one, if that's possible...

RATING:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 14, 2009, 05:16:49 AM
The Forbidden Kingdom
WHAT THEY SAY
Individually, they've starred in the most adrenaline-pumping martial-arts adventures ever. Together for the first time, JET LI and JACKIE CHAN join forces to create the greatest epic of them all - 'The Forbidden Kingdom'. As ancient Chinese warriors, they must train and mentor a 21st century kung-fu fanatic who's been summoned to fight a centuries-old battle and free the imprisoned Monkey King. If you're a fighting fan, the wait is over. The team is ready. The Kingdom has arrived.

MY THOUGHTS
Great movie! The fights are well choreographed, the story is interesting, the women are beautiful and the music sounds good! But I must say, the imagery is the star. Some of the shots are just breathtaking. And you get to see Jackie Chan vs Jet Li! What more could you ask for? ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 14, 2009, 10:40:33 AM
As much as I really enjoyed Transformers ROTF, it had some fatal flaws, now, Im not a Transformer expert but weren't the bots hard to distinguish between? especially the Decepticons.

but I did really enjoy the film, in fact that 2 hour long advert made me go out and buy a Bumblebee transformer and the first film on DVD!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 14, 2009, 11:42:46 AM
Some of the shots are just breathtaking.

That's nice to know! I've had the Blu-Ray for ages, but not got around to it yet... :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on November 14, 2009, 05:00:49 PM
but I did really enjoy the film, in fact that 2 hour long advert made me go out and buy a Bumblebee transformer and the first film on DVD!
When I've asked my godson what he want for Christmas he ask for an Optimus Primus transformer ::)
This isn't my idea of a real gift at all, since he will play with that maybe 2 weeks. But I sure don't want to deceive him... maybe I will have buy to another "real" gift with this unnecessary publicity toy.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 14, 2009, 09:03:30 PM
but I did really enjoy the film, in fact that 2 hour long advert made me go out and buy a Bumblebee transformer and the first film on DVD!
When I've asked my godson what he want for Christmas he ask for an Optimus Primus transformer ::)
This isn't my idea of a real gift at all, since he will play with that maybe 2 weeks. But I sure don't want to deceive him... maybe I will have buy to another "real" gift with this unnecessary publicity toy.

Hold on one minute there! Just back up a step or two!  :redcard:

Transformers were toys long before they were cartoons or films and I had an Optimus Prime when I was a kid and it was one of my favourites. I had it for years! I remember saving my pocket money to get it because it was really expensive (£13, IIRC :P).

There is something inherently cool about cars that turn into robots. Don't forget that and encourage him to play with the thing rather than sit in front of the TV watching the films. In fact, get him a couple so he can bash 'em together!

Actually my favourite toys over all were Zoids! When's that movie out? The comics were cool, so there's plenty of material...  :whistle:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on November 14, 2009, 09:18:20 PM
I also had Optimus Prime as a kid (and some others, too). I really liked those toys. As Jon said: What's not to like about robots which can transform into different things? I am not sure how the Transformers toys are nowadays. But my Optimus Prime could turn into a small robot (without the trailer), into a big robot (with trailer), and into some kind of battle station!  ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on November 15, 2009, 12:11:27 AM
Jon this isn't the kind of gift I give usually, I don't like thing with no goal or use...

In the past I've bought him (for his birthday or Christmas) : A battery truck he can ride, an electric guitar, a soccer game set (2 goal + a ball), a table hockey game, an educative mini-computer, a digital camera (I don't even had one :laugh:) and of course some child dvd.

My brother think I spoil him too much since he is only 6 years old, but he is like my kid ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 15, 2009, 12:42:39 AM
Ok, buy him the Prime. Me and Tom both think you should buy him Optimus Prime, so do that.

But six years old, you say? In my review of Jason and the Argonauts the other day, I said it should be required viewing of six year olds! So there's the DVD as well...  :whistle:

No need to thank me.  :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on November 15, 2009, 12:58:26 AM
Good idea Jon, it even had a french track ;D

Is Clash of the Titans correct also for a young kid Jon?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on November 15, 2009, 01:31:14 AM
Good idea Jon, it even had a french track ;D

Is Clash of the Titans correct also for a young kid Jon?

My niece and nephews ages 8 to 3 LOVE Clash of the Titans. They frequently ask to watch it (again and again) when they come over.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on November 15, 2009, 01:40:37 AM
That's what I was thinking, but it been a while since I've watch it. I didn't remember anything bad in it, but since my definition of this term is quite permissive I find it better to ask first ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 15, 2009, 02:03:22 AM
As much as I really enjoyed Transformers ROTF, it had some fatal flaws, now, Im not a Transformer expert but weren't the bots hard to distinguish between? especially the Decepticons.

I'm fully aware there are some fatal flaws, especially regarding the plot and, to some extent, the robot designs themselves. But it's the bloody Transformers we're talking about! I've grown with them! I had them all as a kid! Megatron who transformed into a gun, Starscream, Optimus, Bumblebee, Jetfire, Jazz, Rodimus.. name it I probably had it!

I've said it before, but I'm almost uncontrollable when it comes to giant robot stories. Transformers, Robot Jox, Voltron, Evangelion, Escaflowne, Gad Guard, Full Metal Panic.. even Robocop! Doesn't even have to be "giant" ;)

I'm far from objective when it comes to reviewing Transformers...

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 15, 2009, 09:39:27 AM
As much as I really enjoyed Transformers ROTF, it had some fatal flaws, now, Im not a Transformer expert but weren't the bots hard to distinguish between? especially the Decepticons.

I'm far from objective when it comes to reviewing Transformers...

(click to show/hide)


For all its flaws it was a good movie, I enjoyed it but im glad Michael Bay admitted the flaws.

I agree with your spoiler.
(click to show/hide)

but I did really enjoy the film, in fact that 2 hour long advert made me go out and buy a Bumblebee transformer and the first film on DVD!
When I've asked my godson what he want for Christmas he ask for an Optimus Primus transformer ::)
This isn't my idea of a real gift at all, since he will play with that maybe 2 weeks. But I sure don't want to deceive him... maybe I will have buy to another "real" gift with this unnecessary publicity toy.

Well, im not exactly a kid XD and my transformer is sitting on my shelf right next to my Jurassic Park figures  :-[

But I agree! get him Optimus, my younger cousin has one, He loves it takes it everywhere with him, Ive even had to put its leg back on when it came un clipped last week, he was crying so much :/

but I did really enjoy the film, in fact that 2 hour long advert made me go out and buy a Bumblebee transformer and the first film on DVD!
When I've asked my godson what he want for Christmas he ask for an Optimus Primus transformer ::)
This isn't my idea of a real gift at all, since he will play with that maybe 2 weeks. But I sure don't want to deceive him... maybe I will have buy to another "real" gift with this unnecessary publicity toy.

Transformers were toys long before they were cartoons or films and I had an Optimus Prime when I was a kid and it was one of my favourites. I had it for years! I remember saving my pocket money to get it because it was really expensive (£13, IIRC :P).

There is something inherently cool about cars that turn into robots. Don't forget that and encourage him to play with the thing rather than sit in front of the TV watching the films. In fact, get him a couple so he can bash 'em together!

Actually my favourite toys over all were Zoids! When's that movie out? The comics were cool, so there's plenty of material...  :whistle:

Lol, I have one of those memories of saving up for something for months and then it was your favourite toy because you worked for it ;P I loved my Jurasic Park Velociraptor.  *See earlier in post ;P*

But I also loved Zoids! i have a few of those around somewhere... not sure where. I believe the one I had was called Garius? :S im not good at remembering names.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on November 15, 2009, 11:20:12 AM
My friend didn't want to see the first Transformers in the cinema, because it's not entirely his style of films. We eventually saw it on DVD together and he admitted that it was much better than he thought.

He was then quite interested to see the second one and ultimately liked it much more than I did (as I thought it was trash). Heck, he went and bought an Optimus prime for himself (it's sitting here on my shelf as I write...). He then considered buying more, but those additional ones are for the nephew.3

So, there's gotta be something there (I just don't see it myself).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 15, 2009, 05:56:09 PM
So, there's gotta be something there (I just don't see it myself).

From both your friends and my experience I have come to one conclusion!

Subliminal Advertising!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 17, 2009, 12:50:41 AM
Well, I'm stuck home with gastroenteritis, so what did I do? Watch movies of course! (Well, when I'm not sleeping that is.. which means I've only watched 1 completely, and I keep falling asleep on the second one).

Review following soon.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 17, 2009, 12:56:01 AM
Anger Management
WHAT THEY SAY
After a small misunderstanding aboard an airplane escalates out of control, timid businessman Dave Buznik (Sandler) is ordered by the court to undergo anger management therapy at the hands of specialist Dr. Buddy Rydell (Nicholson). But when Buddy steps up his aggressive treatment by moving in, Dave goes from mild to wild as the unorthodox treatment wreaks havoc with his life in this hilarious hit comedy that will drive you mad with laughter!

MY THOUGHTS
Always liked this movie! I find Jack Nicholson to be completely hilarious in it! I've seen him mostly in "serious" movies, and I find he handles the comedy quite well! And I find it nice that it dabbles in a different subject matter, even at its core, you could see it as a midlife crisis comedy, I liked that they went a little more specific with Anger Management. I also love how just about everybody who seem to be trying to help Adam Sandler's character, happen to be even crazier then he is!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on November 17, 2009, 11:28:29 AM
I love Anger Management, although I prefer Adam Sandler as a more serious character, which id say he was more serious then funny in this its great! he doesn't need to play Happy Gilmore all the time ;P (I love Waterboy though ¬_¬) Something else I loved about this film was John C Reilly's performance as the monk XD thats hilarious.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 20, 2009, 06:33:27 AM
Star Trek
WHAT THEY SAY
The future begins in J.J. Abrams' smash hit STAR TREK, "a burst of pure filmmaking exhilaration and an irresistible invitation for fun." Scott Mantz, ACCESS HOLLYWOOD

When the Romulan Nero comes from the future to take revenge on the Federation, rivals Kirk and Spock must work together to stop him from destroying everything they know. On a thrilling journey filled with incredible action, the new recruits of the U.S.S. Enterprise will voyage through unimaginable danger in one of the biggest and most critically acclaimed movies of the year.

MY THOUGHTS
What a feast! I loved it! Yes, they took a lot of liberties with the Star Trek canon. But you know what? It made for a great movie! And, somehow, I think that's what Star Trek needed the most. A proper reboot. Not necessarily throwing everything out the window, but subtle changes here and there to jazz it up a bit. And it's been done. With "panache"!

The writers did a good job giving it the Star Trek "feel"....
J.J. Abrams and his team did a good job giving it that shiny new, updated and spiffied look (which overuses lens flare, but eh! that's a small cost to finally getting more Trek)....

But all that would've been moot if the casting was off. These characters are iconic. They have a whole aura around them. And I must say, while I was skeptical on some of the choices, they totally nailed the casting. Each actor was right for the job. Because you know, while Zachary Quinto for Spock is almost a given, Karl Urban as Bones is a pure stroke of genius! I loved him as Bones! And Simon Pegg as Scotty? Yeah I was skeptical. Be he gets full marks! They all do!

I honestly didn't expect to like this new movie that much... but I must admit, to me, it ranks amongst the top. It might even become my favorite before too long!

:ok: to J.J. Abrams and his team. They did a terrific job bringing back Star Trek!

RATING:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on November 20, 2009, 08:43:50 AM
I also loved Star Trek when seen in the IMAX :thumbup:

Only I personally thought that Simon Pegg was not the best choice for Scotty. Maybe he gets more to do with it in a sequel, but here I didn't like it (meaning: I didn't really like how theys trreated Scotty's character, and the choice of Simon didn't help).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on November 20, 2009, 01:11:00 PM
My brother wants to watch my copy of Star Trek sometime this weekend... if he does I may just have to watch it again with him!  :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 23, 2009, 03:56:03 AM
I didn't want to do this.. but with the way things are going in my Alphathon.... I decided to include them..

What happened is I didn't have much time before going to bed on Friday, and I needed a laugh! So I thought why not watch an episode or two of TBBT.. Well, I couldn't stop! and I watched it all! So I'm including each disc in my Alphathon.. hope it's ok with all of yous?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 23, 2009, 04:02:51 AM
The Big Bang Theory: The Complete Second Season
WHAT THEY SAY
The science of funny is back! At work, physicists Leonard and Sheldon and their geek pals conquer the cosmos. At home, real life – from dating to driving – conquers them. This season, Leonard gets a girl. So does Sheldon. (Sheldon?!) Howard drives the Mars Rover into a ditch. Raj woos a terminator. Gorgeous girl-next-door Penny falls under the spell of Age of Conan. And super-smart, überconfident Leslie Winkler reduces mere men to spineless jellyfish. Twenty-three laugh-filled episodes from series creators Chuck Lorre (Two and a Half Men) and Bill Prady (Gilmore Girls) and a talented cast with astronomical comedy I.Q.s show why Big Bang is such a big hit.

MY THOUGHTS
This show cracks me up! Funniest sitcom I've seen in a long time!

This season is even better than the first! I love how instead of going the "usual" route - bigger bolder badder - they actually centered on them even more, and brought to a more personal level.

I love seeing Penny and Sheldon interact. They each live in such a different "world". I also love how they have Penny "win" most of the arguments with Sheldon... yet Sheldon will always get the last word, even though Penny obviously won the argument.

I also like how there's an ongoing story thread. The characters are evolving, and the writers do leave breadcrumbs here and there, and then bring them up at crucial moments later in the season.

All the characters are growing on me, even Howard (love the episode where Penny tells him "the truth" - probably my favourite)!

The only bad I can think of on this show? The wait for Season 3 will be too loooooooooong.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 24, 2009, 04:47:50 AM
Masters of the Universe
WHAT THEY SAY
Planet Eternia and the Castle of Greyskull are under threat from the evil Skeletor, who wants to take over the planet. A group of Freedom Fighters led by the heroic He-Man are accidentally transported to Earth by a mysterious Cosmic Key which holds the power to make Skeletor all-powerful. Once on Earth, He-Man joins alliances with two teenagers as they attempt to find the key and return home.

MY THOUGHTS
I thought I had never seen this movie before. But something felt really familiar right from the start. Some scenes were too familiar to be just a coincidence. And then it hit me, when you see Man-At-Arms, Gwildor and Teela eating at the chicken restaurant! Yes, I had seen this movie before!

Anyway... I don't know what to say really. I didn't strike me as particularly good, but I wasn't bored with it. It was fun and entertaining, but gosh are the effects second-rate! But, I thought Frank Langella did a great job as Skeletor. It's obvious the whole movie is kind of limited, but Langella did a great job with what he had to work with.

So yeah, the movie's got a lot going for it - blatant plot holes, cheesy effects, bad acting, steroid-induced muscles - yeah, its got it all! ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on November 24, 2009, 08:52:07 PM
I didn't want to do this.. but with the way things are going in my Alphathon.... I decided to include them..

I'm claiming that. Trend-setter, that's me.  :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 24, 2009, 10:55:27 PM
I didn't want to do this.. but with the way things are going in my Alphathon.... I decided to include them..

I'm claiming that. Trend-setter, that's me.  :hysterical:

I know it's yours, but I thought it sounded good ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 10, 2009, 05:29:26 PM
G.I. Joe: The Rise Of Cobra
WHAT THEY SAY
When a secret weapon is stolen by the mysterious and evil Cobra organization, mankind's only hope is G.I. Joe, an elite covert strike force featuring the best operatives from around the globe. So, suit up and join Duke, Snake Eyes and Ripcord in a race against time to stop Cobra from using their ultimate weapon and plunging the world into chaos. When all else fails... they don't. They are G.I. Joe!

MY THOUGHTS
Loved it! Action from begining to end. Pretty girls. Nice special effects. Nice gadgets and gear. Even a twist of sorts in the story (not that the story matters much in this kind of movie! haha). Much better adaptation of the subjet than I expected.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 13, 2009, 12:07:53 AM
Bionic Woman: Volume 1
WHAT THEY SAY
Join one of TV's most stunning breakout heroines as the action-packed series Bionic Woman leaps into DVD! From executive producer David Eick (Battlestar Galactica) comes this gripping re-imagining of the universally beloved character.

Jamie Sommers is a hard-working woman struggling to take care of her younger sister. But after a serious, life-threatening accident, Jamie is saved by a top-secret procedure that makes her much more than just an ordinary woman...it makes her superhumanly bionic. Starring hot newcomer Michelle Ryan, as well as Miguel Ferrer (Crossing Jordan), Molly Price (Third Watch), Will Yun Lee (Witchblade), Lucy Kate Hale (How I Met Your Mother), and guest stars Isaiah Washington (Grey's Anatomy) and Katee Sackhoff (Battlestar Galactica), it's a non-stop thrill ride unlike anything you've seen before!

Episodes:
1. Pilot
2. Paradise Lost
3. Sisterhood
4. Faceoff
5. The Education of Jamie Somers
6. The List
7. Trust Issues
8. Do Not Disturb

MY THOUGHTS
I think I understand why this got cancelled so far. I do think it's a bit unfair to cancel a show this quickly, without really giving them time to find their stride.

It's odd. One the one hand, I like the show. It was fun and entertaining. But would it keep me coming back week after week? Not after the 8 episodes I've just seen. The show seemed unable to find a driving force. It's like they didn't know what to do with their characters.

I sad really, I still would've liked to see more. I'm sure they'd eventually found something to make the show interesting, but as it stands, it was underwhelming.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on December 13, 2009, 12:21:18 AM
I enjoyed it a bit more then you did Sébastien. It did have me coming back week after week and anticipating the next week. I was pretty upset when it was canceled. No I don't think it was a great series... but I just had so much fum watching it! Kinda like I did with the relaunching of Knight Rider.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 13, 2009, 02:19:03 PM
The Hound of the Baskervilles
WHAT THEY SAY
On his uncle's death Sir Henry Baskerville returns from abroad and opens up the ancestral hall on the desolate moors of Devonshire. Holmes uncovers a plot to have Sir Henry murdered by a terrible trained hound. First casting of Rathbone and Bruce as Holmes and Watson.

MY THOUGHTS
I was in the mood for some mystery and crime solving.. What's better than Sherlock Holmes for that? And the original, with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce? What more can I ask for?

I've always loved Sherlock Holmes, despite the fact I've never read a book, but everytime I stumble accross something Holmes-related, I always love it. But it's been mostly video games so far. Back a few years ago, I saw a Sherlock Holmes Collection that had the 14 movies with Rathbone, so I bought it.

This is no different. I loved it through and through.  The story is great, Rathbone and Bruce are well cast as our iconic duo.

There's also something about the 1930's cinematography that I found lends well to this kind of story. There's an eeriness to the image during the whole movie that gives it that much more mystery. It may be due to the deterioration and subsequent restoration of the film, but I like to think it is as intended.

It was nice to see Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce have that chemistry and more "easy going" manner. Acting back in the 30's is usually, I find, a bit stiff. Rathbone brings a refreshing change of pace.

Only down point for me was that since this is the first of a series of Sherlock Holmes movies... where was Holmes? Most of the movie is Dr Watson at Baskerville mansion, and then, out of nowhere, Holmes reappears. Oh well, can't be perfect ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 13, 2009, 02:33:18 PM
Have you seen any of the BBC series produced over the years, Sébastien? I've seen the occasional one, as well as a couple of the films. The original book was written at a strange time as Conan Doyle had killed the hero off, but the public demanded more stories. He set Hounds before Holmes' death, which might explain his attempt to put more focus on Watson.

Looking forward to the new film then? I really don't know what to think of an all-action version. Ok, he was supposedly adept at martial arts, wrestling, etc, but the point was he hardly used them...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 13, 2009, 06:10:30 PM
Have you seen any of the BBC series produced over the years, Sébastien? I've seen the occasional one, as well as a couple of the films. The original book was written at a strange time as Conan Doyle had killed the hero off, but the public demanded more stories. He set Hounds before Holmes' death, which might explain his attempt to put more focus on Watson.

No I haven't. But I have my eye set on the Granada series boxset (http://www.amazon.ca/Sherlock-Holmes-Complete-Granada-Television/dp/B000RPCJB6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1260724180&sr=1-1), but last I checked, it was still so damned expensive!

Looking forward to the new film then? I really don't know what to think of an all-action version. Ok, he was supposedly adept at martial arts, wrestling, etc, but the point was he hardly used them...

Yes I am! I think Iron Man could make a great Holmes, but like you, I'm not sure about the whole action movie angle. I like the calm and deductive nature of Holmes. Guess we'll see how it turns out before too long ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: northbloke on December 13, 2009, 08:25:51 PM

No I haven't. But I have my eye set on the Granada series boxset (http://www.amazon.ca/Sherlock-Holmes-Complete-Granada-Television/dp/B000RPCJB6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1260724180&sr=1-1), but last I checked, it was still so damned expensive!


If you can multi-region, Play.com have it here (http://www.play.com/DVD/DVD/4-/10713326//Product.html?P36=HZSHSF) for just under £30.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 09, 2010, 07:11:36 PM
Paranormal Activity
WHAT THEY SAY
YOU DEMANDED IT and now the surprise hit critics call "one of the scariest movies of all time" can be experienced in the most terrifying place of all...your home.

After a young, middle-class couple moves into what seems like a typical suburban house, they become increasingly disturbed by a presence that may or may not be demonic but is certainly most active in the middle of the night. Especially while they sleep.

Paranormal Activity builds suspense night after night all the way to the shocking ending. Roger Ebert calls it "truly scary." Go ahead, WE DARE YOU TO WATCH IT AT HOME...at least you can leave the lights on.

MY THOUGHTS
<shivers> that's a creepy movie! I wouldn't say it really scared me, and I did find it a bit too predictable. But, some scenes are just downright creepy and made my skin tingle!

But I don't know why it didn't scare me. It's exactly the kind of thing that usually scares the shit out of me: Blair Witch, The Ring, The Grudge.. they fall in somewhat the same mold regarding paranormal activities. Is it because I wasn't alone? Maybe I should have watched it alone..

Either, I still found it to be a good movie. I like how it ever so slowly builds up and how it doesn't rely too much on jump scares.

One last thing: I hope they release a new DVD down the line that includes the so-called "Festival Ending" (look it up on IMDb).. It sounds a whole lot more terrifying than what is on the DVD. The "Steven Spielberg"-proposed theatrical ending I found lacking... though it is much better than the "Director's Cut" ending...

RATING:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 09, 2010, 07:35:01 PM
The Haunting in Connecticut
WHAT THEY SAY
Based on a chilling true story, The Haunting in Connecticut charts one family's terrifying, real-life encounter with the dark forces of the supernatural. When the Campbell family moves to upstate Connecticut, they soon learn that their charming Victorian home has a disturbing history: not only was the house a transformed funeral parlor where inconceivable acts occurred, but the owner's clairvoyant son Jonah served as a demonic messenger, providing a gateway for spiritual entities to crossover. Now unspeakable terror awaits, when Jonah, the boy who communicated with the powerful dark forces of the supernatural, returns to unleash a new kind of horror on the innocent and unsuspecting family.

MY THOUGHTS
I didn't quite like it, and I didn't quite hate it. The movie is interesting, but the reliance on cheap scare tactics and horror clichés destroyed it for me. The movie touts being based on actual events, but it blows it so much out of proportions, that I kept "disconnecting" from the movie. It's worth a watch, but meh!

RATING:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:06:37 PM
Downfall
WHAT THEY SAY
Called "dramatic, accurate and harrowing" by the 'San Francisco Chronicle' and nominated for the Oscar® for Best Foreign Film, DOWNFALL takes you into Hitler's bunker during the brutal and harrowing last days of the Third Reich. Seen through the eyes of Hitler's infamous secretary Traudl Junge, optimism crumbles into grim realization and terror as it becomes clear that Germany's defeat is inevitable. As the Russian army circles the city, the dimly lit halls of the underground refuge become an execution chamber for the Fuhrer and his closest advisors.

MY THOUGHTS
I quite liked this portrayal of Hitler, as it makes a lot more sense. If you look at previous portrayals, there is no way a whole nation would rally behind such a man. But here, with the way Ganz plays him, it is a way to show how a whole nation could get manipulated into Hitler's plan. 

The movie as a whole is also good. It gives a believable look at the last days of Hitlet's reign, but I do think the movie drags on at times. It is worth a watch though, if only to get the other side of the medal, so to speak.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:13:59 PM
Forrest Gump
WHAT THEY SAY
Forrest Gump is the movie triumph that became a phenomenon. Tom Hanks gives an astonishing performance as Forrest, an everyman whose simple innocence comes to embody a generation. The winner of six Academy Awards®, including Best Picture, Best Director (Robert Zemeckis) and Best Actor (Tom Hanks).

MY THOUGHTS
I just love Forrest Gump! I could watch again and again and never tire of it. Everything comes together to create a great mesh: music, images, acting, the story itself, the special effects, everything.

This, to me, is a masterpiece of créativité.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:18:14 PM
Big Fish
WHAT THEY SAY
Throughout his life, Edward Bloom (Ewan McGregor) has always been a man of big appetites, enormous passions and tall tales. In his later years, portrayed by five-time Best Actor Oscar® nominee Albert Finney (Best Actor in a Supporting Role, Erin Brockovich, 2000), he remains a huge mystery to his son, William (Billy Crudup). Now, to get to know the real man, Will begins piecing together a true picture of his father from flashbacks of his amazing adventures in this marvel of a movie.

MY THOUGHTS
Marvelous movie. I just love everything Tim Burton's made, and this is no exception. This is such a heartwarming father and son story, with some great imaginative storytelling. The actors all give great performance, but I especially like Ewan McGregor. He is perfect in the role of Edward Bloom showing cunning and naïveté all at the same time. Another movie I could watch again and again and not tire of it.

This movie also is one of the very few to actually draw a tear from me.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:22:25 PM
The Grudge
WHAT THEY SAY
From filmmaker Sam Raimi (Spider-Man®, Army of Darkness) and acclaimed Japanese director Takashi Shimizu comes a terrifying tale of horror in the tradition of The Ring and 28 Days Later.

Sarah Michelle Gellar (TV’s "Buffy The Vampire Slayer") stars as an American nurse who has come to work in Tokyo. Following a series of horrifying and mysterious deaths, she encounters the vengeful supernatural spirit that possesses its victims, claims their souls, then passes its curse to another person in a spreading chain of horror. Now, she must find a way to break this supernatural spell or become the next victim of an ancient evil that never dies, but forever lives to kill.

MY THOUGHTS
It's odd. Last time I watched this, I remember liking it and being scared here and there. Either I'm confusing it with something else, or it's lost its effectiveness since. Either way, I was disappointed this time. I found the story lacking, the ghosts too obvious and predictable. Guess it's true that tastes change with time.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on January 24, 2010, 09:29:22 PM
It's odd. Last time I watched this, I remember liking it and being scared here and there. Either I'm confusing it with something else, or it's lost its effectiveness since. Either way, I was disappointed this time. I found the story lacking, the ghosts too obvious and predictable. Guess it's true that tastes change with time.

Maybe you watched the proper version last time and not the rubbish remake!  ;)

I like Big Fish too, but Forrest failed for me on the last viewing. That last act is such a letdown.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:31:39 PM
Dead Silence
WHAT THEY SAY
Dare to unlock the deadly curse of Mary Shaw...

From the writers and director od 'SAW' comes a new thriller of relentless terror! Ever since Mary Shaw was hunted down and killed, the small town of Ravens Fair has been haunted by horrific deaths. When a local's wife is brutally murdered, he returns home to unravel the terrifying legend of Mary Shaw and the reason why when you see her, you should never, ever scream.

Beware the stare of Mary Shaw.
She has no children, only dolls.
If you see her in your dreams,
be sure you never, ever scream or
she'll rip your tongue out at the seam.

MY THOUGHTS
Well! I've always found ventriloquist dolls quite creepy. This is not going to help ;)

But I was disappointed again. The movie is OK, but I find it lacked tension. The kills and makeup effects are nice, but there's very little tension leading to them.

(click to show/hide)


Also, if it me, of does Billy (on the cover) almost looks like an unfinished and/or alternate/early version of the Jigsaw mask (from Saw)? ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:35:12 PM
I like Big Fish too, but Forrest failed for me on the last viewing. That last act is such a letdown.
(click to show/hide)

I know what you mean, that part bothers me too. But at the same time, Forrest looks so happy starting from that moment in the movie, I find it almost makes up for it.

Actually, I always get annoyed at Jenny, especially with her comment early in the movie, when she tells Forrest that he doesn't even know what love is. I know it's meant as a double-entendre, but at face value, it annoys me so much.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 24, 2010, 09:38:07 PM
Maybe you watched the proper version last time and not the rubbish remake!  ;)

But I can't help to wonder how that went to wrong. I mean, it's the same director, and the same actors for the ghosts. Oh well, guess the studios in Hollywood truly are broken ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on January 24, 2010, 09:44:14 PM
Maybe you watched the proper version last time and not the rubbish remake!  ;)

But I can't help to wonder how that went to wrong. I mean, it's the same director, and the same actors for the ghosts. Oh well, guess the studios in Hollywood truly are broken ;)

It's so long since I saw it. But excuse the blatant self-promotion and consider what I said in my review for Ring 2 (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5216.msg85584.html#msg85584). That sequel to the remake (which actually wasn't terrible), also managed to employ the original director. Somehow though, the understated Japanese style kept jarring with the Hollywood overplaying of music and a cast who were used to being nervous from the start, instead of honest.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: DJ Doena on January 24, 2010, 10:57:03 PM
I quite liked this portrayal of Hitler, as it makes a lot more sense. If you look at previous portrayals, there is no way a whole nation would rally behind such a man. But here, with the way Ganz plays him, it is a way to show how a whole nation could get manipulated into Hitler's plan. 

In Germany this movie has been criticized for making Hitler a human being and not a monster. Un-demonizing Hitler is usually a big no-no around here.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Antares on January 24, 2010, 11:22:25 PM

I just love Forrest Gump! I could watch again and again and never tire of it. Everything comes together to create a great mesh: music, images, acting, the story itself, the special effects, everything.

This, to me, is a masterpiece of créativité.

I have to admit that I'm completely in the opposite camp on this one. I saw it in its original theatrical run and both my wife and I would have rather endured an interrogation session at Guantanamo in its place.  :yucky:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 06:39:33 PM
   
Alice in Wonderland (2010)
         
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/alice.jpg)
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/alice-chapelier.jpg)
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/alice-red.jpg)
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/alice-white.jpg)
      

WHAT THEY SAY
19-year-old Alice returns to the whimsical world she first encountered as a young girl, reuniting with her childhood friends: the White Rabbit, Tweedledee and Tweedledum, the Dormouse, the Caterpillar, the Cheshire Cat, and of course, the Mad Hatter. Alice embarks on a fantastical journey to find her true destiny and end the Red Queen's reign of terror.

MY THOUGHTS
No, it's not out on DVD yet. No, I didn't pirate it either. Yes, I did go to the Cinema! Believe it or not..

So, what did I think of Burton's Alice? I'm not so sure.

Visually, I found it stunning (except for the 3D - more on that later). I liked the darker palette, the stylized set and all, yet it is all the familiar Alice we're all accustomed to.

That should be no surprise for anyone here - I've always said I love Tim Burton's visual style, and Alice delivers in that aspect.

Also, I love Helena Bonham Carter as the Red Queen. She gives her an air of superiority, yet a craziness that I loved. The other actors are good too (well, I'm not too sure about Anne Hathaway's protayal of the White Queen - but the rest of the cast is good enough to compensate).

Where I find the movie lacks, is with the actual script. Granted, I haven't seen the original Alice for a while, so I'm not entirely sure what I'm about to say is actually true - but in any case, that's how I felt.

As you most probably all know by now, this version takes place about 10 years after the "original" Alice. Well, they didn't have to do it. I'm guessing there are details here and there to make it actually take place 10 years later, yet the fact Alice has all but forgotten it all makes so it's basically the exact same story, told with the same characters just a tad older.

I still liked the movie, I was just expecting... more. A different story, more like a reunion movie with Alice who's come back to save the day. Instead, it's Alice comes back to save the day - yet does all the same things she did before, because anyway, she doesn't remember anything. It's really odd.

----

Now the 3D..... ugh! What an absolutely useless piece of crap gimmick!

I don't know if it is the fact that Alice was filmed in 2D and the 3D was made after the fact in post production (as opposed to Avatar which was actually filmed in 3D) but I found the 3D totally useless and actually detrimental to the movie.

People look like cardboard cutout in most scenes.

There's a scene at the beginning of the movie where you have two people talking in front of a big house. When it's a side shot, you see the house is 100 or more feet away from them. When it's a front shot, on top of having them look like cardboard cutout, it look like the house is just a few inches behind them.

Also, part of the 3D process involves separating elements into depth levels or panes. Let's say they default to the main actors being at level 0. Well, everything behind them will look ok, it lacks depth, but it is bearable. But everything in front ends up almost flickering being hard to make out actually almost gave me headaches!

And the main offense of the 3D on a movie like Alice is that Burton charges the screen with little details all over. But in 3D, I found it very hard to focus on anything other than the "main action". I don't know if they blurred it in post as part of the 3D process or if it's out of focus to begin with, but I hated the effect it gave. I like to look for those little details in Tim Burton's movies, but I could here because of the 3D effect.

To think they want to do this with classics.... ugh! No thank! Star Wars in 3D? hahahaha NEVER!!

RATING
In 3D:
In 2D:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 07:15:12 PM
Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant
WHAT THEY SAY
Welcome to the Cirque du Freak, a traveling sideshow filled with magical creatures, misunderstood freaks, and the mysterious vampire, Larten Crepsley (John C. Reilly). Drawn to the dark, unpredictable world of the Cirque, 16-year-old Darren (Chris Massoglia) decides to trade in his ordinary life for a chance to become an immortal vampire. As Darren explores his newfound powers and faces unexpected enemies, he'll find that his existence as a memeber of the undead is filled with more challenges, suspense and fun than he ever thought possible. Based on the best-selling book series and co-starring Salma Hayek, Josh Hutcherson, Ken Watanabe, and Willem Dafoe, it's a fast-paced, suspenseful journey critics call, "Imaginative!" (Peter Hall, Cinematical.com)

MY THOUGHTS
Ok movie. Nothing special. It was entertaining, but I found I didn't care much for the actual characters. It drags along at times with not much happening. The concept of the warring Vampire factions is interesting, but not fleshed out enough.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 07:18:57 PM
2012
WHAT THEY SAY
From Roland Emmerich, director of The Day After Tomorrow and Independence Day, comes the ultimate action-adventure movie, exploding with groundbreaking special effects. As the world faces a catastrophe of apocalyptic proportions, cities collapse and continents crumble. 2012 brings an end to the world and tells of the heroic struggle of the survivors.
Starring John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Danny Glover and Woody Harrelson.

MY THOUGHTS
CGI fest. An excuse to destroy the Earth, yet again.

They want it to be a sort of modern retelling of Noah's Ark.. but in the end, the "plot" is there to show chaos, mayhem and destruction. Nothing more. It's along the very same lines as Day After Tomorrow...  :hmmmm:

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on March 28, 2010, 07:20:19 PM
Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant
WHAT THEY SAY
Welcome to the Cirque du Freak, a traveling sideshow filled with magical creatures, misunderstood freaks, and the mysterious vampire, Larten Crepsley (John C. Reilly). Drawn to the dark, unpredictable world of the Cirque, 16-year-old Darren (Chris Massoglia) decides to trade in his ordinary life for a chance to become an immortal vampire. As Darren explores his newfound powers and faces unexpected enemies, he'll find that his existence as a memeber of the undead is filled with more challenges, suspense and fun than he ever thought possible. Based on the best-selling book series and co-starring Salma Hayek, Josh Hutcherson, Ken Watanabe, and Willem Dafoe, it's a fast-paced, suspenseful journey critics call, "Imaginative!" (Peter Hall, Cinematical.com)

MY THOUGHTS
Ok movie. Nothing special. It was entertaining, but I found I didn't care much for the actual characters. It drags along at times with not much happening. The concept of the warring Vampire factions is interesting, but not fleshed out enough.

RATING




I had hoped this one would be good... though I did have my doubts from the trailer.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: snowcat on March 28, 2010, 07:24:37 PM
I quite liked the vampires assistant... ive seen it three times now.

I saw it at the cinema and twice on DVD.

I admit that at some points it gets boring but its also an interesting film that was obviously rushed because of Twilight. It could have been better, but it could have been worse... try it out Pete... you may like it.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 07:24:47 PM
Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant

I had hoped this one would be good... though I did have my doubts from the trailer.

Yeah me too. I was really disappointed. But if you get the chance, do try it. It is good enough to view at least once - who knows, you might like it! It's better than The Sorority in any case ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 07:31:18 PM
The Men Who Stare at Goats
WHAT THEY SAY
In this comedic look at real life evetns that are almost too bizarre to believe, reporter Bob Wilton (Ewan McGregor) teams up with Lyn Cassidy (George Clooney) and discovers an experimental top-secret wing of the U.S. military. Here soldiers are trained to change the ways wars are fought through New Age psychic powers by passing through walls, reading the enemy's thoughts and even killing a goat by simply staring at it.

Inspired by Jon Ronson's non-fiction best-seller of the same name, this is an eye-opening and hilarious story of the government's attempts to harness soldier's paranormal abilities in order to combat its enemies.

MY THOUGHTS
I really liked this movie! It's not an out and out comedy. It is really absurd at times, and it does have moments of laugh out loud moments.

All four main actors are really great in their role. I particularly loved Kevin Spacey.. but I do have a "soft spot" for him. I like him in pretty much anything he's done.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on March 28, 2010, 07:33:45 PM
Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant

I had hoped this one would be good... though I did have my doubts from the trailer.

Yeah me too. I was really disappointed. But if you get the chance, do try it. It is good enough to view at least once - who knows, you might like it! It's better than The Sorority in any case ;)

 :laugh: I am sure it is!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 28, 2010, 07:40:23 PM
You are on a review roll today Sebastien ;D
Any chance to see reviews for the three Misty Mundae's movies that you got last year in a near future. I'm curious to hear about them since I don't think I've watched them...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 07:45:37 PM
5150, Rue des Ormes
WHAT THEY SAY
5150 Elm's Way is located at the end of a quiet street in a generic small town. When Yannick Bérubé falls off his bike, he knocks at the door of the Beaulieu residence so he can clean the blood off his hands. But Jacques Beaulieu and his family have other plans for Yannick.
(click to show/hide)


MY THOUGHTS
I've spoilerized part of the back cover blurb because they go too far. They almost spoil the whole movie right there (good thing I hadn't read it before watching the movie!) Part of the power of the movie is not knowing what's going on and having it be revealed as the movie moves along, and that back cover blurb above spoils most of it  ::)

Anyways, this is a great movie! I loved it! It's suspenseful, intense, and genuinely thrilling! The pacing is pretty much perfect, and the tension is well built throughout. The three main actors are great in their respective roles.

I can't talk too much about the movie without spoiling it - it really gains a lot if you go into it without having seen or heard anything about it. Let's say it like this - Patrick Sénécal here in Québec is our very own Stephen King. He writes disturbing horror stories and he's a great author. 5150 Rues des Ormes is a great adaptation of a great book.

If you want to discover Quebec Cinema - and you like psychological thrillers - 5150, rue des Ormes is a great example of Quebec cinema at its best.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 07:53:30 PM
You are on a review roll today Sebastien ;D

Yeah! But I realise I've left a little too much time between watching the movies and actually reviewing them. I watched Cirque du Freak and 2012 back on March 5th! So I'm reviewing from memory and impression.

Goats, Alice, 5150 (and upcoming review of Quiet) have all been watched this weekend. Goats (and The Quiet) I don't have much to say (or to add to) - But Alice and 5150 lifted "passions" in me ;)

Any chance to see reviews for the three Misty Mundae's movies that you got last year in a near future. I'm curious to hear about them since I don't think I've watched them...

Didn't already post review of The Seduction of Misty Mundae and Chantal? This would leave only Sinful.... oh! just realised, you meant Shock-O-Rama and Screaming Dead, didn't you?

If I can get my movie partner to watch them with me, it may come sooner, but if not, it'll be after hockey season is over (meaning when the Canadiens are kicked out of the series)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 28, 2010, 07:58:39 PM
Yeah I talk about Shock-O-Rama and Screaming Dead (I was sure there was three in the WYG post). So it won't be too long since they will not make the playoff (even if Halak does miracle for the team) :P

I'll wait...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 08:04:03 PM
Yeah I talk about Shock-O-Rama and Screaming Dead (I was sure there was three in the WYG post). So it won't be too long since they will not make the playoff (even if Halak does miracle for the team) :P

I'll wait...

Well, I do think they'll make it, but in all honesty? I wouldn't mind at all if they didn't make it or even got eliminated in 4 - I haven't missed a game this year, and in some way, I am fed up with hockey now! 82 games (not even counting the series) is a lot of hockey to watch!

I still don't understand how Baseball can keep interesting for so many games in a single season.. how many is it these days? 3'857'682 games a year? ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 28, 2010, 08:13:12 PM
162
But since it's one of the most exciting sport to follow, 162 is not enough. Of course for me this sport means many good childhood memories of playing with my dad. ;D

Too bad we don't have a team anymore, but I'm used to support teams who quit the country :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 08:14:16 PM
The Quiet
WHAT THEY SAY
This erotic and suspenseful tale of sex, lies and betrayal stars 'Elisha Cuthbert' ('The Girl Next Door') as Nina Deer, a pretty cheerleader whose life is turned upside-down by the arrival of her parents' godchild Dot ('Camilla Belle', 'When a Stranger Calls'), a deaf and mute girl recently orphaned by her father's death. Although Nina looks upon Dot's deafness with disdain, her family and friends develop a strange attraction to her, and Dot soon becomes a sounding board for everyone's heaviest burdens. But when Nina becomes convinced that Dot is hiding a few secrets of her own, she decides to confess a family secret so disturbing, it cannot be ignored. Also starring 'Martin Donovan' (TV's 'Weeds') and 'Edie Falco' (TV's 'The Sopranos').

MY THOUGHTS
Can't believe I still hadn't posted a full review of this little gem! I know I've mentioned a few times how much I like it, but I really was under the impression I had posted a full on review in the past. Oh well, here goes then! ;)

What can I say? I love this movie! Even more so, because it was a complete surprise when I first watched it. I had bought the movie solely based on the fact the Elisha Cuthbert and Camilla Belle were in it. And look at that picture? Wouldn't that make you want to watch it and makes the film look really "yummy"?

Turns out this drama has a dark secret and really dark story, dealing with a heavy and disturbing theme.

But what, to me, makes this movie so great is the so called "twist".

The movie already develops like a good drama should, establishing the characters, their relationship, evolving as the movie moves along. And then, the twist hits at the end, and the movie takes a whole new meaning. Some situations that almost made no sense, now play a very important part in the flow of events. I find the ending is very powerful too.

I find it hard to actually explain without spoiling it, but I really really love it. And even though I have watched it 4 times now, it still has the same impact on me.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 08:20:14 PM
162
But since it's one of the most exciting sport to follow, 162 is not enough. Of course for me this sport means many good childhood memories of playing with my dad. ;D

Too bad we don't have a team anymore, but I'm used to support teams who quit the country :laugh:

Yeah, I actually have more memories of the Expos than I do of the Canadiens. But, as a sport, I've always prefered Hockey over Baseball. I love playing Baseball, but watching it? I just can't..

It's odd really. I like a good hockey because it's almost non stop action, up and down the rink (yeah, I know, with defensive teams, this doesn't happen - but i did say a "good" hockey game). With baseball (and football also) it's always stopped. It's like 5 minutes of action, spread over 3 hours (football is about 15 minutes). Yes, the short times there is actually action might be intense, but it's still a whole lot of nothing for a very long time.

Mind you I love playing the game though. Baseball is really fun to actually play (especially catcher - the position I've played in the little leagues back then), yet, I still prefer hockey (and since I was catcher at baseball, guess where they put me for hockey? I'll give you a hint: starts with Goal, ends with The-Browser-The-Shall-Not-Be-Named ;))
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on March 28, 2010, 08:36:04 PM
I have started playing also as a catcher untill a ball broke my nose and I became affraid of the ball (it was a friend league, so no protective gear). Because of this I moved to the left field for the rest of the season, but my career was over after this summer because the ball continued to frighten me when I was at the plate. :bag:

Being a goalie is fun. You are the guy who freeze to death while playing :laugh:
I've played a couple of years as a defenceman in a hockey putch team. It was fun, but my big smoking habit made the game really hard to play for me.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 08:39:56 PM
I have started playing also as a catcher untill a ball broke my nose and I became affraid of the ball (it was a friend league, so no protective gear). Because of this I moved to the left field for the rest of the season, but my career was over after this summer because the ball continued to frighten me when I was at the plate. :bag:

My uncle decided I was looking too afraid of the ball and made me play catcher without a helmet and throwing the ball harder and harder until I missed one and received it right between the eyes. That's when he said:

"Now that you know how it hurts to receive the ball right in the face, you'll know to never miss another one"

He was right. He got me back at the plate, with helmet this time, and I very rarely missed a ball. Surprisingly, I made me better instead of scaring me to death.

It also helped me play goalie too, I wasn't afraid of the puck anymore.

And the way they divided the teams, I never had time to freeze while in goal. They always put me in goal with the weak team, and but the stronger better guys in the opposite team.

Awww good times, good times. ;)

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on March 28, 2010, 08:42:05 PM
I know this will only make people think I am weirder then they already thought (my hatred of music)... but I hate sports too.... All sports!  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on March 28, 2010, 10:45:16 PM
When they gave out love of sports they must have given me Pete's share, I love them all. If there is any type of sporting event on, I will watch that over anything else. I even got hooked on curling!

My favorites are hockey, football, baseball, golf, basketball, tennis, summer and winter Olympic events, etc. etc. etc.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on March 28, 2010, 11:40:38 PM
With the last Olympics, I found out I actually love curling! All the strategies and trying to outplay the opponent. I even watched it in english because the english commentators seemed more knowledgeable about the sports than the french ones.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Rogmeister on March 29, 2010, 04:49:48 AM
Baseball is actually my favorite sport despite the fact my team, the Pittsburgh Pirates, suck and have for a long time  :tv:  The last year they had a winning record was way back in 1992.  That's right, they have had nothing but losing records for the last 17 seasons and I really don't think this season will be any different.  But hope springs eternal.  I think my interest in baseball is helped a little by the fact I also play fantasy baseball.  And also the fact I play baseball video games.  It's the one way my team has a chance to win the title...  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on April 13, 2010, 05:28:46 AM
Well, not too surprising but.. they've got me again! 3 episodes in and I'm hooked! Although I just keep getting even more Lost... and I love it!  :thumbup:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on April 13, 2010, 06:09:32 AM
Lost...

I just want them to wrap up the few remaining episodes so that I can have the ending spoiled over the internet somewhere. It's a great show, but it moves way too slow for me. Do the same stuff over four seasons, maybe even three, and I might be interested more.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 04, 2010, 03:12:28 AM
Lost: Season 5
WHAT THEY SAY
The epic story of LOST twists, turns and time-shifts in its outstanding fifth season. Packed with bonus material, including a revealing interview with the cast and an exclusive behind-the-scenes feature, LOST is better than ever on DVD.

When destiny calls, the Oceanic 6 find their way back to the island. Discover what forced them to return, and find out the fate of all those who were left behind.

The answers to some of LOST's most pressing questions are revealed in this spectacular 5-disc collection, complete with deleted scenes an an incredible vault of exclusive bonus features. The show that revolutionized primetime proves once again why it is television's most addictive and creative series. "You'd be crazy not to watch," proclaims Matt Roush of TV Guide.


MY THOUGHTS
The plot thickens again! Is it even possible? Looks like it ..

This season was interesting. Some really intriguing and interesting situations were created, as much between the characters themselves, as with the situations they are thrust in. I did think the season dragged a bit, but it starts well, and ends well, so all is forgiven!

Can't wait to see what the season finale implies for season 6, and for all that happened before!

Still a great series, 5 seasons in. I'm actually sad that it's coming to an end in season 6, but at the same time, I don't think I could take much more of those twists and turns.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 04, 2010, 03:22:16 AM
Robot Chicken: Season 2
WHAT THEY SAY
It's back! Season Two of the ADULT SWIM high-octane hellspawn returns with 20 freshly hatched episodes! It's a brain-scrambling bonanza of pop culture-crushing sketch comedy, acted out by chunks of wire and plastic cunningly crafted to resemble people and animals, then stop-motion animated frame by painstaking frame in the style of the old masters! COME PARTAKE IN A PUNK ROCK PUPPET POOL PARTY!


MY THOUGHTS
I love the concept of the show, best summed up by their own tagline: "Stop-motion animation for grown ups". And it's true to form!

Yes it's crude and there's a lot of scat jokes. But at the same time, they can hit pure genius:

Mario and Luigi: Vice City


Inspector Gadget Terminator:
http://www.livevideo.com/video/benhn1/87054C98EDEF44A0A029F152B06351D2/robot-chicken-inspector-gadget.aspx

And it's these little gems I love. Some of the channel flip jokes are great too, even though they often last only 3-6 seconds.

Of course I love stop motion animation to begin with, so it helps!

Great show!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 04, 2010, 04:05:43 AM
Sherlock Holmes
WHAT THEY SAY
The hangman did his job, Dr. Watson declared the condemned man dead…yet Lord Blackwood has emerged from the tomb to assert his deadly will over 1890 London. Is he in league with the forces of hell itself? Is the whole Empire in peril? It’s a mystery macabre – and only Sherlock Holmes can master it. Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law put memorable imprints on Holmes and Watson in this bold new reimagining that makes the legendary sleuth a daring man of action as well as a peerless man of intellect. Baffling clues, astonishing Holmesian deductions, nimble repartee, catch-your-breath scenes of one slam thing after another – director Guy Ritchie helms the excitement reintroducing the great detective to the world. Meet the new Sherlock Holmes!

MY THOUGHTS
Is there anything Robert Downey Jr. is not good at?

I love this reimagining - or rather, return to roots - for the return of Sherlock Holmes!

I must admit I wasn't entirely sure when I saw the previews and how it looked like it was headed towards boring action-packed-look-first-no-content fare, but I was pleasantly surprised! This Sherlock Holmes doesn't deal in much subtlety, but still, it worked! I like this depressive, darker, deranged Holmes. And I especially like Downey's portrayal.

Hope they make a few sequels!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 04, 2010, 04:09:50 AM
The Island
WHAT THEY SAY
Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson lead an all-star cast as residents of an isolated, high-tech compound. But when they discover they're actually clones, and worth more dead than alive, they stage a daring escape. Battling an unfamiliar environment and an armed team of mercenaries in hot pursuit, they'll risk their lives and freedom to save those they left behind - and reveal the truth about 'The Island'.

MY THOUGHTS
Just as good as I remember it. It's a nice story, with great action, that exposes a dilemma I'm certain we're heading head-first into. Maybe I won't see it myself, but in a few generations...

Scarlett Johansson is stunning as always. Wouldn't mind her cloned meself ;)
Ewan McGregor gives a good performance.
It was really fun to see Neelix again.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 08, 2010, 04:17:30 AM
Quick question - I'm about to watch Ghost in the Shell for the first time ever. But which version?

Ghost in the Shell
  OR  
Ghost in the Shell 2.0

Guess I already found my answer - thanks Jon! (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,6134.msg109060.html#msg109060)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on May 08, 2010, 01:46:49 PM
Oh absolutely the first version. Then do please spin-up the other one and compare. :thumbup: But in any case, I hope you like the film after I enthused about it so much! :tomato:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 10, 2010, 04:19:06 AM
But in any case, I hope you like the film after I enthused about it so much! :tomato:

Well, you won't have to feel so bad about it - I liked it! And anyways, I bought movie 5 years ago so your review had nothing to do with me buying - it did have something to do with me deciding to watch it after all that time however ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 10, 2010, 04:29:50 AM
Ghost in the Shell
WHAT THEY SAY
2029 - A female cybernetic government agent, Major Motoko Kusanagi, and the Internal Bureau of Investigations are hot on the trail of "The Puppet Master," a mysterious and threatening computer virus capable of infiltrating human hosts. Together, with her fellow agents from Section 9, they embark on a high-tech race against time to capture the omnipresent entity.

Ghost In The Shell took the world by storm, exhibiting a new dimension of anime with unprecedented, mesmerizing cinematic expression. Seamlessly merging traditional cel animation with the latest computer graphic imagery, this stunning sci-fi spectacle challenged the boundaries of mainstream animation with detailed artistic expression and a uniquely intelligent story line.

Veteran director Mamoru Oshii skillfully creates the ultimate anime experience in this futuristic masterpiece based on the ground-breaking comic book by Masamune Shirow. A movie that questions human existence in the fast-paced world of the information age, this award-winning, cyber-tech thriller has established itself as one of the leading Japanese animation films of all time.

MY THOUGHTS
It's funny. I kinda feel about Ghost in the Shell the same way I felt after watching Avalon (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0267287/) ... and oh! Surprise-Surprise! It's the same director ;)

As with Avalon, I can't quite put my finger on why I like Ghost in the Shell. It's an odd feeling really, because I'm not quite sure I understood everything that was going on (Jon's review helped in that respect) yet at the same time, I don't feel lost.

I must say though, the animation is great! There's great detailing. In some scenes, I wasn't sure if I was looking at a stylized picture and a simple drawing. I was concerned about the fact it mixed cel animation with CGI (which I usually don't like too much - I find the effect jarring with the "dirtyness" of cel animation vs the "cleanness" of CGI) but here it didn't detract at all.

The music helps set the tone too. It's haunting at time, subtle when it has to, and enhances the experience overall.

So yeah, I liked Ghost in the Shell. Quite a bit, actually. I'm looking forward to receiving GitS2:Innocence and also giving 2.0 a spin soon.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 10, 2010, 05:47:39 PM
I started watched Farscape last night. I've only watched 3 episodes so far but... Why did I wait that long before watching it? I'm already loving it!  :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2010, 04:17:53 AM
Bah! It was bound to happen some day...

As I said before, I've been watching Farscape (you may also have noticed from my watched banner ;))

I bought the Starburst edition - and the first 2 seasons came on 2 DVD-18 (dual layer / dual sided discs) each. I don't how many of you have fallen victim to the shakiness of those stinkin' DVD-18, but ... it just happened..

at the worst possible time...

right in the middle of the Season 1 Finale!!! argh!! I want to know what happens!! But I won't until I get a replacement ... I hate that!! ..
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on May 26, 2010, 04:38:06 AM
RossRoy I was wondering... this has nothing to do with Farscape but how is it that everytime I look your display picture is a different girl? All quite nice one's a must admit  :thumbup:.
But still, are you just changing it a lot or do you have some sort of automatic rotating thing?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2010, 05:34:55 AM
RossRoy I was wondering... this has nothing to do with Farscape but how is it that everytime I look your display picture is a different girl? All quite nice one's a must admit  :thumbup:.
But still, are you just changing it a lot or do you have some sort of automatic rotating thing?

I've set up a script that serves a different JPG each time the page is loaded.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on May 26, 2010, 06:33:18 AM
Bah! It was bound to happen some day...

As I said before, I've been watching Farscape (you may also have noticed from my watched banner ;))

I bought the Starburst edition - and the first 2 seasons came on 2 DVD-18 (dual layer / dual sided discs) each. I don't how many of you have fallen victim to the shakiness of those stinkin' DVD-18, but ... it just happened..

at the worst possible time...

right in the middle of the Season 1 Finale!!! argh!! I want to know what happens!! But I won't until I get a replacement ... I hate that!! ..

Oh no...how annoying.  I hope you don't have to wait too long to get the replacement.  That would irritate me to no end.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2010, 02:24:22 PM
Oh no...how annoying.  I hope you don't have to wait too long to get the replacement.  That would irritate me to no end.

Problem is, the company is gone. ADV Films has shut down last year. So getting a replacement will be next to impossible.

So I looked around on Amazon and I found the Farscape Complete Series for a decent price - comes down to around 18$ per season - so I bought that.

I still managed to watch the season finale though - there's about a minute that it can't read.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: hal9g on May 26, 2010, 02:28:36 PM
Amazon had the complete series for $59.99 in January.  A price I could not resist!   :whistle:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2010, 02:42:35 PM
Amazon had the complete series for $59.99 in January.  A price I could not resist!   :whistle:

I probably would've jumped on it - even without the current situation - if I had seen that price then!

Still, after watching the first season, it's worth it! ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 26, 2010, 11:17:46 PM
Farscape: Season 1
WHAT THEY SAY
The adventure of Farscape begins when American astronaut John Crichton (Ben Browder) undertakes an experimental space mission in a ship of his own design. After a wild ride through an unexpected wormhole, he tumbles out on the other side of the universe right into the middle of an intense space battle. Far from home and family, Crichton joins a quarreling, offbeat band of escaped strange alien prisoners, hardly a “crew,” onboard a massive ship named Moya – who just happens to be a living creature herself! It’s the beginning of a fabulous and colorful voyage for Crichton, who discovers strange creatures, friends, great danger and great love.

MY THOUGHTS
After a great opener, the show got off to a bit of a shaky start. It took a few episodes for it to find its identity. Once the ultimate antagonist is revealed, the story really starts to take shape and the main characters finally start establishing their relationships.

There's a nice, unexpected twist in the last few episodes of this season, which actually makes sense, and moves the story in an interesting direction. It'll be interesting to see what they do with it in Season 2.

One thing I especially like about Farscape is all the use of puppets and animatronics. Pilot is particularly interesting. But then, the show being produced by The Henson Company gives a hint about the quality of the puppets ;)

Great entertainment!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on May 27, 2010, 12:30:15 AM

Problem is, the company is gone. ADV Films has shut down last year. So getting a replacement will be next to impossible.

So I looked around on Amazon and I found the Farscape Complete Series for a decent price - comes down to around 18$ per season - so I bought that.

I still managed to watch the season finale though - there's about a minute that it can't read.

It's good that you found it for a decent price..and still got to watch the last episode. 

Amazon had the complete series for $59.99 in January.  A price I could not resist!   :whistle:

I got the complete series back then from Aamazon too.  No way I was letting that price pass by..especially since I had almost ordered it when it was on sale for about $100.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on May 27, 2010, 12:58:40 AM
I've never seen Farscape but am interested to watch it. I heard it was filmed in Australia. Is there any landscape etc where you can tell that it was filmed here or is it mostly in-studio stuff?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 27, 2010, 01:56:44 AM
Some of the episodes that take place outside probably do have recogniseable landscape (I wouldn't being very far from Australia!) but most of it takes places in space or inside ships or inside whatever structures they find themselves stuck into - so I'd say it is not too distracting.

Your mileage may vary  ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 12, 2010, 06:28:07 AM
Zombieland
WHAT THEY SAY
Nerdy college student Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg) has survived the plague that has turned mankind into flesh-devouring zombies because he's scared of just about everything. Gun-toting, Twinkie-loving Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson) has no fears. Together, they are about to stare down their most horrifying challenge yet: each other's company. Emma Stone and Abigail Breslin co-star in this double-hitting, head-smashing comedy.

MY THOUGHTS
What a great run that was! There's a few WTF moments, some nice surprises, but what I liked the most is the creativity shown all around on how to make the zombies suffer.

All four leads are good, but I'd say Woody Harrelson pretty much steals the show as Tallahasse the crazy "action-guy". It's also great how they managed to make the world look real and they didn't go overboard and didn't fall into the trap of putting zombies all over the place.

Yes, it's got the running zombies variety, but at least they clearly say it's a disease and not the undead.

In any case, the movie is great fun, and I loved it!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 13, 2010, 03:53:21 AM
Dune / Children of Dune
 
WHAT THEY SAY
DUNE
In the distant future, the planet Dune is the only source of a mysterious spice that gives whomever controls it dominion over commerce and civilization. By way of an ancient prophecy, a young man realizes his destiny as Dune's messiah and leads a rebellion against the corrupt galactic empire and forever changes the balance of power. A spectacular version of this science fiction odyssey!


CHILDREN OF DUNE
Against a backdrop of interplanetary intrigue, rebellion and betrayal, the future of humanity itself rests with the Children of Dune in this sweeping tale of visionary sci-fi adventure! A spectacular sequel to the Emmy Award-winning Frank Herbert's Dune, starring Academy Award® winner* Susan Sarandon.

MY THOUGHTS
This is the second time I watch these two miniseries. It also happens that I'm currently re-reading the books.

I love Dune. I keep coming back to the books and rereading them.

Coming into this the first time, I had my apprehensions. The story of Dune is so complex and convoluted, I didn't how they'd do it on screen. Especially when considering Lynch's Dune, which I like also, but it is somewhat of a mess. I had read the book before seeing Lynch's movie, and I'm sure that's the only reason why I was able to follow along with the story.

Being a miniseries, hence having more time available, they could show and tell more of the story. And it pays. They can show more of the subtle stuff. I really like how they treated the story.

Almost the only thing that bugs me are the visual effects. Not because they are bad, they are quite adequate, problem is there's a lot of CGI, and it was all done on a TV budget. Some effects look great (the worms), but some a completely cringe worthy (the desert mouse). But I think they did a decent job with what they had available.

I also especially like the music in Children of Dune. Actually, most of you probably know the music of Children of Dune without even realising it! The music was used in the trailers for Star Trek 2009, Master and Commander, Kung Fu Panda, Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull... to name a few. After the lackluster effort on Dune (don't even remember who did the music - and I won't check), it's really refreshing to get such a strong yet nuanced soundtrack by Brian Tyler for Children.

If you're a fan of Dune, and not too anal about complete faithfullness to the source material and understand the constraint of movies and TV miniseries, this is a great example of a good adaptation.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 21, 2010, 01:42:05 AM
Farscape: Season 2
WHAT THEY SAY
Farscape Season Two unfolds as a tapestry of histories and mysteries. Following Season One's harrowing finale, John Crichton and the crew of the living space ship Moya must now evade the villainous Scorpius. But that's even harder than it seems, thanks to the insidious connection Scorpius has forged with Crichton. And if the Peacekeepers weren't enough trouble, Crichton and company soon cross paths with the ambitious, reptilian Scarran race.

The crew's unstable camaraderie is tested when they discover the part a crew member played in the brutal fate of Moya's first Pilot. Things spin even further out of control as the crew struggles to deal with the violent nature of Moya's offspring—not to mention murders, royal weddings, identity crises, terrorists and slave traders.

Building upon the mind-boggling Season One, Farscape Season Two delivers even more ingenious stories, extraordinary new characters, razor-sharp dialogue and dazzling special effects, from the artists at Jim Henson's Creature Shop™.

MY THOUGHTS
Wow! This is something else! I liked the first season, but this literally blew me away!

Sure, there are many one off episodes and antagonist of the week type things, but they still all serve to move the story forward and things that happen in a given episode have repercussions later. Which I like! And the payoff in the final episodes of the season is mind blowing.

And I must say, with that cliffhanger? Phew! Good thing I already have the next season and can keep watching tonight to know what happens! I can't imagine what it was like back when it was still on TV and having to wait a full off season for the conclusion!  :fingerchew: 

(click to show/hide)

I don't think I would've made it ...

Oh and in case there were any doubts - I absolutely love the show!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 01, 2010, 05:46:19 AM
The Revenge of Doctor X
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #1
WHAT THEY SAY
A NASA scientist is ordered to take a vacation due to showing signs of stress while working on his latest missile project. Traveling to Japan, the scientist decides to indulge in his botany hobby and begins experimenting on a venus flytrap he brought along on his trip. Using radical techniques and falling into madness, the scientist eventually creates a plant creature that feeds on flesh and blood, wich then sets off to find food in the form of the people of a nearby community.

MY THOUGHTS
I can sum this movie up very easily: Tooooooooooo ... Daaaaaaammmmnnnnn ... Looooooooonnnng ...

Nothing happens! The "Doctor" just keeps on babbling and babbling and babbling. Then a guy in a suit humanoid plant appears and goes on a rampage .... or not. It basically just stands there rocking left to right.

Oooooh scary!  :yawn:

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on July 01, 2010, 08:13:47 AM
Boo!

(click to show/hide)

I was less rough than you since I give it a 3, but most for its ridiculousness than anything else... Don't forget Ed Wood wrote that.

Is it great when a cover had nothing to do with anything in a film :whistle:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 01, 2010, 08:30:09 PM
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
WHAT THEY SAY
Enter a dazzling world of fantasy in The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, director Terry Gilliam's magical adventure tale starring Heath Ledger in his last film role along with Christopher Plummer, Johnny Depp, Colin Farrell and Jude Law. In exchange for extraordinary powers, Doctor Parnassus (Plummer) makes a deal with the Devil to turn over any child of his when they turn sixteen. But as his daughter Valentina's (Lili Cole) birthday approaches, a mysterious stranger (Ledger) arrives with the power to change everything. In this captivating, explosive and wonderfully imaginative race against time, Doctor Parnassus must fight to save his daughter in a never-ending landscape of surreal obstacles - and undo the mistakes of his past once and for all!

MY THOUGHTS
Good thing it has the word "Imaginarium" in its title - because it is a very imaginative movie! Sometimes maybe a little too imaginative. Some of the world within Parnassus' Imaginarium are so out there they almost lost me. It's a very wild ride and for a long time, I didn't know what was going on what with the travelling theater troop and the mirror leading to the Imaginarium. But in the end, it works, makes sense, and fits the story.

For those of you who may not know: This is the last movie of late Heath Ledger. So last in fact that he never completed it. Three different actors came to the rescue: Colin Farrel - Jude Law - Johnny Depp. The integration of these three alternate actors actually works with the movie! It actually makes sense! And all three did a pretty good job taking over the role.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 01, 2010, 08:34:00 PM
Dead Man
WHAT THEY SAY
Johnny Depp (Sleepy Hollow, The Astronaut's Wife) delivers a remarkable performance in this highly acclaimed tale of adventure and intrigue in the wild, wild West!

A young man in search of a fresh start, William Blake (Depp), embarks on an exciting journey to a new town…never realizing the danger that lies ahead. But when a heated love triangle ends in double murder, Blake finds himself a wanted man, running scared - until a mysterious loner (Gary Farmer) teaches him to face the dangers that follow a "dead man." With an outstanding supporting cast including Gabriel Byrne (End Of Days, Stigmata) and Robert Mitchum (Cape Fear), and a sizzling soundtrack by Neil Young, Dead Man is another motion picture triumph from filmmaker Jim Jarmusch.

MY THOUGHTS
Oh boy. Talk about boring. The pace is slow. The speech is slow. They even manage to make the travel slow and painful!

Actually, I never even finished it. We stopped it after 70 minutes because it was just dreadful.

I think Plan 9 From Outer Space is better than this! Yes, I said it. Something is worse the Plan 9

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 02, 2010, 04:37:42 PM
Jesse James Meets Frankenstein's Daughter
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #2
WHAT THEY SAY
Jesse James and his partner Hank Tracy are on the run from Marshall MacPhee after their latest robbery and stumble across the decrepit residence of Maria Frankenstein. Maria, the granddaughter of the infamous Baron Frankenstein, is continuing the family legacy of experimenting in resurrecting the dead human tissue and has the still-living brain of the original monster.

MY THOUGHTS
Right off the bat I can tell you that the poster outrights lies. There's not nearly enough action to warrant the claims of "roaring guns" and "raging monster".

This is a pretty run of the mill cash-in movie. Take two popular icons, mash them together into a movie, and spew it out. It's nothing to call home about, but I found it correct. It didn't bore me out of my mind, but I'm not eager to watch it again either.

It was a bit unsettling though that the role of pretty-spanish-girl was played by a 40 years old lady. Oh she looks good, no question, but don't they usually have all sexed up young ladies for these types of role? Mind you the film was made in the sixties.. maybe it was different then.

The lady playing Frankenstein's Granddaughter though - yowhza! What a fine looking lady! Despite her variable foreign accent :laugh:

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 03, 2010, 04:03:07 AM
Up
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #3
WHAT THEY SAY
From the revolutionary minds of Pixar Animation Studios and the acclaimed director of Monsters, Inc. comes a hilariously uplifting adventure where the sky is no longer the limit.

Carl Fredricksen, a retired balloon salesman, is part rascal, part dreamer who is ready for his last chance at high-flying excitement. Tying thousands of balloons to his house, Carl sets off to the lost world of his childhood dreams. Unbeknownst to Carl, Russell, an overeager 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer who has never ventured beyond his backyard, is in the wrong place at the wrong time - Carl's front porch! The world's most unlikely duo reach new heights and meet fantastic friends like Dug, a dog with a special collar that allows him to speak, and Kevin, a rare 13-foot-tall flightless bird. Stuck together in the wilds of the jungle, Carl realizes that sometimes life's biggest adventures aren't the ones you set out looking for.

MY THOUGHTS
Another good one by Pixar!

Great little story. If I am objective, it's a rather standard story but the way it's shown, the imaginativeness of it all makes it a solid movie. There many nice little touches here and there.

Yes, I quite liked it!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on July 03, 2010, 05:10:40 AM
Sebastien since you watch the films in the Chilling Classic set at least try to watch Horror Express (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4156.msg82022.html#msg82022), Naked Massacre (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4618.msg81777.html#msg81777) (Carole Laure is in it), Scream Bloody Murder (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4618.msg81685.html#msg81685), Silent Night, Bloody Night (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4156.msg82335.html#msg82335) and Werewolf in a Girl's Dormitory (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4618.msg81883.html#msg81883) who are five good one in this set... Of course, you can watch War of the Robot (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,6431.msg115399.html#msg115399) also if you want to continue with the bad one :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 03, 2010, 06:27:03 AM
Sebastien since you watch the films in the Chilling Classic set at least try to watch Horror Express (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4156.msg82022.html#msg82022), Naked Massacre (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4618.msg81777.html#msg81777) (Carole Laure is in it), Scream Bloody Murder (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4618.msg81685.html#msg81685), Silent Night, Bloody Night (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4156.msg82335.html#msg82335) and Werewolf in a Girl's Dormitory (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,4618.msg81883.html#msg81883) who are five good one in this set... Of course, you can watch War of the Robot (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,6431.msg115399.html#msg115399) also if you want to continue with the bad one :laugh:

We'll see  ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 03, 2010, 06:35:21 AM
Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #4
WHAT THEY SAY
Brace yourself for the hard-hitting action and high-flying excitement of Street Fighter: The Legend of Chun-Li. including an all new unrated cut! Based on the wildly popular Street Fighter video game series, this powerful martial arts adventure explores the origins of the Street Fighter universe through Chun-Li (Kristen Kreuk), who avenges her father’s death at the hands of Bison (Neil McDonough) and his evil Shadaloo Empire. Now the stage is set, the challenge is clear, the legend will be forged...but who will prevail? Round One. Fight!

MY THOUGHTS
Bought that movie after seeing the trailer and because of Kristin Kreuk.. then I read the reviews. Didn't bode too well. But after watching it for myself, I find it's ok. It's good entertainment. Very simple revenge story, some over the top action, some questionable "magic". It's nothing special, but it's nothing too bad either.

I thought Kristin Kreuk did a fine job with the role. Robin Shou was fine as Gen. But the rest of the cast? There's an expression in hockey where they will call up young player as "jersey filler". That's how they felt.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 05, 2010, 03:59:52 AM
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #5
WHAT THEY SAY
Harry Potter learns on his 11th birthday that he is the orphaned son of two powerful wizards and possesses magical powers of his own. At Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, Harry embarks on the adventure of a lifetime, discovering a world of magic and fantasy where he is destined to live.

MY THOUGHTS
What can I say? I love the Harry Potter franchise. It took me a while to give in, but once I did, I discovered a great little world filled with magic and a very interesting story.

In this first installment, of course the characters are introduced. Our main trio, their closest allies and their future enemies are pretty much already all laid out. The stage is set, now let the magic happen.

I like how magical they make everything look. Hogwarts looks absolutely stunning. A shame though that the Quidditch match and some other effects are already showing their age. It didn't stop me from enjoying the movie though! Still, it's not as good as some of the upcoming ones!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 05, 2010, 04:11:58 AM
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #6
WHAT THEY SAY
The next installment in the Harry Potter series finds young wizard Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) and his friends Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) facing new challenges during their second year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry as they try to uncover a dark force that is terrorizing the school.

MY THOUGHTS
Year 2 at Hogwarts.

Further advancing the story, thing are starting to take a turn for the worse. Voldemort starts getting a bit more fleshed out. Our heroes are getting more powerful and now have more control over their powers. Yet, it still feels like they got lucky. We finally start seeing the lovely Ginny Weasly more.

I love how some seeds are already being planted for events that will happen much further down the line. It helps cement the story as a whole, give it direction to drive it forward.

This year's story is great. The Drago-Harry anomosity is building. Snape is... well.. Snape  :laugh:

Unfortunately, this marks the last appearance of Richard Harris as Albus Dumbledore. I would've loved to see how he'd handle some situations in the later stories. His replacement does a good job, but right form the first movie, Richard Harris brought something special to the role.

A good movie, a good story, and part of a great fantasy world.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 05, 2010, 04:15:33 AM
I completely agree with Richard Harris bringing something special to the part of Dumbledore.  He was prefect in the part and fit it much better than Michael Gambon..but that doesn't mean I think Gambon is bad in the part.  His Dumbledore just isn't the same.  I agree I would have liked to see Harris in the later movies. 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 05, 2010, 04:20:10 AM
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #7
WHAT THEY SAY
As Harry Potter readies himself for his third year at Hogwarts, an incident in which he is unable to control his anger forces him on the lam. At the same time, a dangerous man named Sirius Black escapes from the Azkaban prison with one thought on his mind: to track down and kill Harry Potter. The third year at Hogwarts is full of excitement and danger for Harry and his friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger.

MY THOUGHTS
This movie (and the book that inspired it) to me, marks the beginning of when Harry Potter's story stepped from being a good book/movie series, to a great book/movie series.

As Harry Potter ages and matures, so does the storytelling. We start seeing layers upon layers upon layers in the stories. Dumbledore's army is slowly taking shape, The Order of the Phoenix is slowly revealed. Important figures are starting to appear. The backstory of James and Lilly Potter is slowly being revealed. Harry's place in all of this is taking shape. The tension is rising between the different camps. You can see the pawns being placed and nuggets of information being fed to the audience, all moving the story forward, and leading a great things yet to happen.

I like the darker look Alfonso Cuaron gave the movie. This installment also sports my favourite Potter soundtrack by John Williams.

Azkaban, to me, really marks when Harry Potter (as a story) became a great story and great storytelling. And it just keeps getting better from now on.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 05, 2010, 04:24:25 AM
I completely agree with Richard Harris bringing something special to the part of Dumbledore.  He was prefect in the part and fit it much better than Michael Gambon..but that doesn't mean I think Gambon is bad in the part.  His Dumbledore just isn't the same.  I agree I would have liked to see Harris in the later movies. 

Yeah Michael Gambon (thanks for reminding me!) does a good job too. And I really like how he doesn't try to emulated Harris' Dumbledore. He does his thing, and I appreciate it like that.

Still, something was lost in the transition. Like you said, Richard Harris was such a perfect cast.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 05, 2010, 04:58:42 AM
I completely agree with Richard Harris bringing something special to the part of Dumbledore.  He was prefect in the part and fit it much better than Michael Gambon..but that doesn't mean I think Gambon is bad in the part.  His Dumbledore just isn't the same.  I agree I would have liked to see Harris in the later movies. 

Yeah Michael Gambon (thanks for reminding me!) does a good job too. And I really like how he doesn't try to emulated Harris' Dumbledore. He does his thing, and I appreciate it like that.

Still, something was lost in the transition. Like you said, Richard Harris was such a perfect cast.

It is good that he doesn't try to emulate Harris...that probably wouldn't have worked.  There was something special about Harris as Dumbledore that is missing from Gambon's take on the character.  For me, Harris is how I pictured Dumbledore when reading the books.  I think he is more like Dumbledore from the books.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 05, 2010, 06:17:03 AM
Right from the first movie, there seemed to be a connection between Richard Harris and Daniel Radcliffe. Kind of like a father/son relationship. Which fits the books perfectly. Gambon seems a bit colder, more distanced.

It goes to show how much the intangible, the body language speaks.

I always remember that little wink (I think it's right after Harry gets sorted in Gryffindor in the first movie) Dumbledore gives to Harry. it is possible to read a so much into that simple wink. The face Richard Harris with that wink - kind of like I know what just happened, don't worry, all's going to be alright. And it lasts only a second or two.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 05, 2010, 06:49:38 AM
Right from the first movie, there seemed to be a connection between Richard Harris and Daniel Radcliffe. Kind of like a father/son relationship. Which fits the books perfectly. Gambon seems a bit colder, more distanced.

It goes to show how much the intangible, the body language speaks.

I always remember that little wink (I think it's right after Harry gets sorted in Gryffindor in the first movie) Dumbledore gives to Harry. it is possible to read a so much into that simple wink. The face Richard Harris with that wink - kind of like I know what just happened, don't worry, all's going to be alright. And it lasts only a second or two.

That's it exactly.  There is definitely more of a connection between Harris and Radcliffe....and that translates into more of a connection between the characters.  The little things - like that wink you mentioned - show how Dumbledore is interested in Harry from the beginning.  That connection isn't there with Gambon.

Harris had a bit of ....mischief in how he played the part I think that is missing with Gambon most of the time.  There was a bit of it in the third movie, but not much.  Like at the end of the first movie when Dumbledore visits Harry and tries one of the jelly beans and gets the ear wax.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 06, 2010, 02:54:04 PM
Fanboys
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #8
WHAT THEY SAY
Get ready for the comedy adventure that’s “smart, funny, and tailor-made for the inner-Jedi in all of us,” (Pete Hammond, Hollywood.com). In 1998, four childhood buddies with a shared love for all things Star Wars reunite for one final, hilarious odyssey. Their insane plan: a cross-country road trip to storm George Lucas’ Skywalker Ranch and steal a copy of Episode I before it’s released. With the police, a crew of angry Trekkies, and a crazy pimp hot on their trail, what could possibly go wrong? Featuring Dan Fogler (Balls of Fury), Jay Baruchel (Tropic Thunder), and Kristen Bell (Forgetting Sarah Marshall), plus a slew of hysterical surprise cameos, “the Force IS strong with this one!” (Brian Gallagher, MovieWeb)

MY THOUGHTS
This movie was funny. There are some great flashes and nods to Star Wars in how the scenes are set up. A few great cameos by Star Wars cast members.. but also one cameo by someone who has nothing at all to do with Star Wars but I found it really funny.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 06, 2010, 03:01:23 PM
The Voyeur
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #9
WHAT THEY SAY
At a college in Rome, a professor, nicknamed "Dodo" is in a deep depression. His stunningly beautiful wife has just left him for another man. Dodo wants her back very badly and has erotic daydreams about her. A beautiful young student in his class asks him for a ride home and seduces the lucky man, but still he wonders about his wife and her lover. Wile visiting his father he meets his dad's very sexy live-in nurse who takes care of much more then his broken leg. She tells Dodo of a beautiful young woman whose been having a sexual relationship with his father?

MY THOUGHTS
While I may not be in a position to actually say it, after all you can count on a single hand the number of erotic movies I've watched in my whole life, but this seemed like a rather typical cliched erotic movie. By that, I mean that the "plot" pretty much takes a backseat in order to put our main protagonist in erotic situations.

So as far as my little "experience" with erotic movies go, I enjoyed this one, despite it being in italian with subtitles!.
The guy's wife is absolutely stunning! She's worth the price of entry by herself. The other girls are just icing on the cake.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 08, 2010, 06:01:14 AM
I Am Legend
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #10
WHAT THEY SAY
The last man on earth is not alone. Will Smith plays that lone survivor in 'I Am Legend', the action epic fusing heart-pounding excitement with a mind-blowing vision of a desolate Manhattan. Somehow immune to an unstoppable, incurable virus, military virologist Robert Neville (Smith) is now the last human survivor in New York City and maybe the world. Mutant plague victims lurk in the shadows...watching Neville's every move...waiting for him to make a fatal mistake. Neville is driven by only one remaining mission: to find an antidote using his own immune blood. But he knows he is outnumbered...and quickly running out of time.

MY THOUGHTS
Pretty interesting movie. As usual, I didn't care too much for the CGI creatures, but as CGI creatures go they were OK.

But the rest of the movie is very good. Will Smith gives a great performance here as our main protagonist. I especially like how he plays with the fine line between mental breakdown and being strong to find the cure. I also liked the idle banter with the mannequins.

I watched the alternate ending. Meh! What the alternate ending suggests would've made a much better ending, but the CGI creature cannot render it convincingly. So the decision to go with a Hollywood ending is the right one in this case.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 08, 2010, 06:05:12 AM
Enchanted
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #11
WHAT THEY SAY
A fairy tale comes to life in this thoroughly original, new Disney Classic. Drawing inspiration from its classic heritage, Disney creates an inspired story unlike any you've experienced before. Filled with excitement, fun, and incredible music from the legendary Alan Menken, 'Enchanted' is the ultimate fish-out-of-water adventure. For princess-to-be Giselle, life is a fairy tale – until she's banished from the animated land of Andalasia and thrust into the very unmagical, live-action world of modern-day Manhattan. When a cynical, no-nonsense divorce lawyer comes to her aid, little does he realize that this joyful, wide-eyed innocent is about to enchant him. 'Enchanted' – the musical comedy that will have your entire family under its spell.

MY THOUGHTS
Nice little twist on the Snow White story. Nothing much more to say. It's pretty much a standard Disney fare. I found Amy Adams incredibly yummy in this movie.

Fun and entertaining little family movie.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on July 08, 2010, 12:52:26 PM
We came to the exact same conclusion on I Am Legend! Though I was also frustrated by the wasted title.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 11, 2010, 06:02:21 AM
Bitch Slap
Alphabet Marathon - July 2010 - Entry #12
WHAT THEY SAY
When a down-on-her-luck stripper, a drug-running killer and a ball-busting businesswoman try to retrieve stolen jewels from a ruthless gangster's hideout, they find themselves competing against an assortment of bizarre criminals – and each other. It's an adrenaline-fueled cocktail of bodacious bad girls, sex, violence and cleavage that'll leave you intoxicated for days!

MY THOUGHTS
Oh boy, I think I should be ashamed.

This movie makes no sense. It is way over the top. But you know what? I loved it!

At the beginning of the movie, it was completely aimless. All there was is three girls looking sexy, moving suggestively, looking sexy. But once they get the guy out of the trunk, and they start having the flashbacks, and fleshing out what led this situation, it started being good. And it just kept getting better.

Oh sure, it kept being over the top. It kept making almost no sense. But it was compelling. I was glued to seat the whole time.

It's odd really. I know I shouldn't have liked that so much. But they got me. And you know what? I think I really need to visit the movies that inspired that, like Dragstrip Girl, Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!, Kung Fu Nun (if Wikipedia is to be believed in any case).

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on July 11, 2010, 08:02:05 AM
No idea if Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! was an inspiration for this one, but I'm sure you would like it ;D
Just one advice : get the region 2 release from Arrows (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Faster-Pussycat-Kill-DVD/dp/B0007OC78W/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1278827905&sr=1-9) and not the american release from RM Films (they are 2 thiefs who had stolen all the proprieties of Russ Meyer while he was in the last stage of his alzheimer disease). Anyway their dvd are pieces of crap quality and overprice...

Remember the sympathics guys who wanted to sue me? It's them ;)

In fact, I'm sure you would like most of his film ;D
The set (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Russ-Meyer-Collection-DVD/dp/B000FAOAX8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1278827905&sr=1-1) cost more now than when I got it in december, but it really worth more than that in enjoyment and fun :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 11, 2010, 03:22:25 PM
In fact, I'm sure you would like most of his film ;D
The set (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Russ-Meyer-Collection-DVD/dp/B000FAOAX8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1278827905&sr=1-1) cost more now than when I got it in december, but it really worth more than that in enjoyment and fun :thumbup:

Ordered!  :thumbup:

EDIT: And already dispatched!  :o
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 12, 2010, 03:52:00 AM
Farscape: Season 3
WHAT THEY SAY
The third season of Farscape explores the wonders, possibilities and dangers of the wormhole phenomenon more completely than ever before. Through more ominous, adult-themed tales, the series also peeks into the darker corners in the minds of Moya's crew.

In particular, Farscape Season Three shows the dichotomy of John Crichton: from his volatile, passionate bond with Aeryn to his ability to at once unite and divide the loyalties of the crew. As crew members embark on personal missions to deal with individual agendas, the stories showcase smaller ensembles, allowing each character and relationship more room to grow. Before the company reunites, lovers and friends are betrayed and family ties are ripped asunder. Old enemies become allies and dear friends are lost forever.

Some critics have called Season Three the year Farscape matured into a "grown up show." Others see it as the year its creators' brilliance was thrown into overdrive.

MY THOUGHTS
Wonderful! That's all I can think of. The alien designs are awesome. The stories told are actually awesome. The show is awesome! There were a few filler episodes, but that's to be expected. But I like how daring they are about it.

There's an episode that takes place mostly in Crichton's (the human) head that plays out as cartoons. There's also an episode that I can only qualify as a hyperactive drug trip. It's odd and jarring - but they dare make it different! And I love it!

The season ends with a BIG cliffhanger again.. Can't wait to see it resolved.. so I'll end this review here  :laugh:

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on July 12, 2010, 05:13:24 AM
EDIT: And already dispatched!  :o
The british amazon is always efficient like this and they arrive here faster than Amazon US delivery. The shipping is very low also (almost less than an order from our amazon without the free delivery option). The downside is that you will have to pay the tax duties on it :(

Hope you will like it and had a lot of fun watching the films ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 12, 2010, 05:22:31 AM
The british amazon is always efficient like this and they arrive here faster than Amazon US delivery.
While they may generally be more effective, but this was even on a Sunday!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 12, 2010, 04:01:50 PM
The british amazon is always efficient like this and they arrive here faster than Amazon US delivery.
While they may generally be more effective, but this was even on a Sunday!

That's what surprised me so much!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 12, 2010, 09:37:38 PM
I've gotten emails on Sundays about orders being shipped from Amazon at times. 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 15, 2010, 02:15:15 PM
Farscape: Season 3

I'll let my review stand, because it is still true, but I just realised that I haven't been paying attention enough during some episodes at the end of S3 and am now completely lost at the beginning of S4. So I'm rewatching the last 8 episodes of S3. I'm already starting to pick up story threads I missed previously  :bag:

That'll teach me to build these while watching:
Walking AT-AT (http://starwars.lego.com/en-us/Products/exclusive/10178.aspx)
Space Shuttle (http://shop.lego.com/product/?p=10213&LangId=2057&ShipTo=CA)

(click to show/hide)


I've also watched the interview with Gigi Edgley (Chianna - the grey girl)... Chianna is a bit crazy on the show, but form the interview, Gigi also has a refreshing crazy edge... I think I'm in love! (along with millions of other fans no doubt)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on July 15, 2010, 06:56:31 PM
Lego!  :thumbup: :clap:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on July 17, 2010, 02:40:45 AM
You're in good company, Sébastien. David Beckham was on Jonathan Ross' final show tonight and said he loves Lego! Bought a Taj Mahal while in Spain, but ran out of time to finish it, so left it behind. :thumbup:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 17, 2010, 02:45:50 AM
Nice!

I can't find it on Lego's site, but I saw a review of this upcoming set
http://technicbricks.blogspot.com/2010/07/tbs-techreview-10-8043-motorized.html
and it is tickling my fancy! Love it!

They also some awesome collector Star Wars sets - but they're way too expensive!

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 17, 2010, 06:18:31 AM
I had Legos when I was younger..I never could make anything though.  Houses with no doors, windows, and definitely no roof.   :laugh:

I haven't tried any of the sets..I've seen some cool ones I've been tempted by, but I don't know that I could do them.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 17, 2010, 06:34:26 AM
I haven't tried any of the sets..I've seen some cool ones I've been tempted by, but I don't know that I could do them.
The instructions are very detailed nowadays. ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 17, 2010, 07:16:17 AM
I haven't tried any of the sets..I've seen some cool ones I've been tempted by, but I don't know that I could do them.
The instructions are very detailed nowadays. ;)

and from what I remember - they were pretty detailed back when I was young too
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 17, 2010, 07:51:10 AM
I may try one sometime. 

I never had any sets to build anything specific.  Just had the blocks..things for doors and windows that never could use.  Though I was like 7 or so then.

I did see some cool sets tied in to Toy Story 3 recently...expensive though.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on July 17, 2010, 01:09:11 PM
and from what I remember - they were pretty detailed back when I was young too
I only had a big bucket with the Lego pieces inside. :bag:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 17, 2010, 03:54:20 PM
and from what I remember - they were pretty detailed back when I was young too
I only had a big bucket with the Lego pieces inside. :bag:

Yeah I had that too.. but I also had a few sets with instructions.

Marie, the instructions a pretty detailed, but it can take a while to build. That AT-AT walker took me 4 arns and the shuttle took 6 arns.. granted I'm probably a bit slow because I like to dump all the pieces in a bucket and then look for parts in there (instead of opening each bag in order) but still, assembling 1200+ little lego pieces takes a while - even with instructions - especially when it's hard to differenciate between is it a red light or an orange light? is that part dark grey or black? the booklet doesn't help you too much with some colors.. even clear vs yellow can be hard to distinguish in the book..
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Tom on July 17, 2010, 04:06:27 PM
I had a lot of Lego bricks (even windows, doors and roof pieces). They weren't from a set with instructions. They could be bought like this.
But mostly I played with Lego Technic (don't know how if it is called like that outside of Germany). My first one was a sports car with working gears and pop-up headlights. The second instructions (I loved how they were instructions to build two or more different things with the same pieces) was for a jeep if I remember correctly.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 17, 2010, 04:15:11 PM
I had a lot of Lego bricks (even windows, doors and roof pieces). They weren't from a set with instructions. They could be bought like this.
But mostly I played with Lego Technic (don't know how if it is called like that outside of Germany). My first one was a sports car with working gears and pop-up headlights. The second instructions (I loved how they were instructions to build two or more different things with the same pieces) was for a jeep if I remember correctly.

They're called Lego Technic here ia North America too. Actually, the AT-AT Walker I built has a lot of Technic-type parts in it. It's motorized and actually moves after all  :laugh:

I also have a few Star Wars set as Technics - C3PO, a Stormtrooper, one of those big tri-legged brown droid Droideka (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Droideka) and one of the beige army droid B1 Battle Droid (http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/B1_battle_droid) from the prequels (can't remember their name!  :bag:)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 17, 2010, 05:58:00 PM
Farscape: Season 3

I've refinished S3 yesterday. Great stuff! I'm quite happy to have gone back because I had missed some great moments!

Problem is - I will still be just as lost watching S4 because they start S4 a LONG period of time after the S3 finale (they say "Some Time Later" - but John, who's usually impeccably shaved, now has a Tom-Hanks-at-the-end-of-Cast-Away beard)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 24, 2010, 07:16:58 AM
Farscape: Season 4
WHAT THEY SAY
A great deal of time passes between Seasons Three and Four which helps develop the show's extraordinary characters even more fully. More recent additions to the crew, including Noranti and Sikozu, as well as a shocking former enemy, play major roles in a series of thrilling, surreal, and nearly lethal adventures.

As each season has raised the stakes for the crew, this season raises the stakes for the universe itself, with a series of escalating dangers that threaten not only the Farscape galaxy, but Crichton's home galaxy as well.

Season Four features some of the most imaginative science fiction seen in the series so far, while always remaining true to the extraordinary characters, passionate chemistry and whip-crack dialogue that have become Farscape signatures.

MY THOUGHTS
I'm sitting here, completely flabbergasted.

How could they end it like that?? Ok, yes, I know, they didn't plan on getting cancelled, after all, the final episode does end with the words "to be continued" but damn! What an end!

Yet somehow, it seems to fit the show. It ends on a big cliffhanger. You could even say it ends badly. But then, the whole crew of Moya (that's the ship's name) had 4 full years of being screwed, their plans not working, etc. Yes, they usually manage to get out of their sticky situations, but rarely without a scratch. So that final episode, ending the way it does, fits with the rest of the show.

And you know what? As it stands right now, I believe Farscape is the best damn sci-fi TV show ever produced!

It's imaginative . . . It's different . . . It's daring

I loved it!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 25, 2010, 04:12:52 AM
I've started watching Doctor Who... Wow! That show is crazy!

3 episodes in - we've been in the present, 5,000,000,000 years in the future, and now 150 years in the past! :stars:

To paraphrase a well known fast food chain - I'm lovin' it! ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 25, 2010, 04:32:26 AM
Do you have Farscape Peacekeeper Wars?  It is a movie made after the series ended and it ties up things.  I saw some of it on tv once..and I got the DVD recently.

http://www.amazon.com/Farscape-Peacekeeper-Wars-Ben-Browder/dp/B0006FO9B0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1280025119&sr=1-1 (http://www.amazon.com/Farscape-Peacekeeper-Wars-Ben-Browder/dp/B0006FO9B0/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1280025119&sr=1-1)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 25, 2010, 04:58:08 AM
Do you have Farscape Peacekeeper Wars?  It is a movie made after the series ended and it ties up things.  I saw some of it on tv once..and I got the DVD recently.

Yeah I have it.. but I want to let the last episode of S4 sink in before I watch it. I'm a bit scared it might ruin everything else.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 30, 2010, 11:06:07 PM
Doctor Who: Series 1
WHAT THEY SAY
A set containing all 13 stories from the 2005 series of 'Doctor Who'. Christopher Eccleston's Doctor is wise and funny, cheeky and brave. An alien and a loner (it's difficult keeping up with friends when your day job involves flitting through time and space), his detached logic gives him a vital edge when the world's in danger. But when it comes to human relationships, he can be found wanting. That's why he needs new assistant Rose.

Rose (Billie Piper) is a shop-girl from the present day. From the moment they meet, the Doctor and Rose are soulmates. They understand and complement each other. As they travel together through time, encountering new adversaries, the Doctor shows her things beyond imagination. She starts out as an innocent, unfettered by worldly concerns. But she ends up an adventurer who, by the end of the series, can never go home again...

MY THOUGHTS
Watching this first series of Doctor Who is my very first exposure to The Doctor.

Oh sure, I knew what the Daleks were, what they looked (though I always wondered what was so scary about them), I knew the "Doctor Who" concept, I had seen the blue police box they call The TARDIS. I just never knew how they all fit together.

Now I do.

Wish I had known before!

What a great show! Love the concept. Instead of being locked in whatever world they start the show on, the TARDIS allows pretty much anything! Like I said in a previous post, the first 3 episodes of the series show that right there: episode 1 takes place in the present with the first meeting of The Doctor and Rose. Then they go to the future, but not 100 years in the future, 5 BILLION years in the future! Where Humanity's obsession with weight has pushed the last human (http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Lady_Cassandra) WAY over the edge  :laugh:. And then what? They go in the past! 100 or so years in the past! But there's nothing stopping them from going to prehistory, or even the big bang (from episode titles, I think it's coming actually hehe)

I loved Christopher Eccleston as The Doctor. I love how the character recognizes the awesome power he wields as a Timelord with his TARDIS and also how he marvels at history unfolding right before his eyes. And Christopher brings such a great energy and passion to the role! I have no idea how the eight previous Doctors were, I love this ninth!

I also like the choice of Billie Piper as the companion. She is beautiful, but not too much, and she can be quick witted and is more than a match to The Doctor. She actually challenges him, forces him to see things differently.

Both of them also have a great chemistry. And it's a good thing, because the whole show hinges on their performance and chemistry. If the Doctor / Companion dynamics don't work, the whole show crumbles upon itself. Fortunately for us, it works! Wonderfully!

It's really sad that Christopher decided to leave after a single series. But from that quick single flash at the end of the series finale, I'd say David Tennant might be another interesting Doctor (actually, since I've already watched 5 episodes of series 2 - I say :thumbup: to David Tennant. Different, but quite good.) 

The alien designs on Doctor Who are also quite imaginative (something I really liked on Farscape), from the Face of Boe (http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Face_of_Boe) to the Forest of Cheem (http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Forest_of_Cheem), or even Moxx of Balhoon (http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Moxx_of_Balhoon) (who greets by spitting in your face! :laugh:)

Great show! It's fun, energetic... but way too short! Damn British with their "quality over quantity" mentality! Why not have both? ;)

RATING
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 01, 2010, 04:31:30 AM
Not related to movies or anything but... my wireless mouse receiver just died on me!  :'(
And the worst is? It is was a Logitech G7 mouse - they are not made anymore!
I loved that mouse! First wireless mouse I found to actually work just as good - if not better - than a wired one...
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/crying.gif)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on August 01, 2010, 04:34:33 AM
That sucks. :(
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 01, 2010, 04:56:36 AM
That sucks. :(

Yeah.. but we have plenty of computers here so it was easy to find a temporary replacement... I'm just crushed that I'm going to have to get used to a new mouse...

I'm leaning towards a Logitech M510 (http://www.logitech.com/en-ca/mice-pointers/mice/devices/6811) - anybody got experience with it? Other suggestions?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on August 01, 2010, 05:01:42 AM
I don't know anything about mice, so I'm less than helpful with that.  I just have the generic mouse that came with my computer.  It is a laser mouse, but it isn't wireless. 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on August 01, 2010, 11:25:27 AM
A friend of mine gave me a brand new wireless mouse. I am never going to use it so if you want it, it's yours. I'm not at home (dog sitting for a friend) now but I will run home this afternoon and find out what kind it is and let you know.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Sanuye on August 01, 2010, 01:00:22 PM
I bought a logitech M705 yesterday. The wheel didn't work anymore in the old one...
The new one is a laser wireless mouse. It's nice but the "feel" is different.
And I managed to zoom the DVDCol forum page and now I don't know how to go back to normal  :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: hal9g on August 01, 2010, 03:46:23 PM
Try holding down the CTRL key while moving the scroll wheel on the mouse back and forth.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 01, 2010, 03:48:16 PM
Try holding down the CTRL key while moving the scroll wheel on the mouse back and forth.

Or, on Firefox at least, hitting CTRL-0 (that's a zero, not the letter O) it should revert back to standard zoom

Edit: Works on Internet Explorer 8 too
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Sanuye on August 01, 2010, 03:56:49 PM
Thank you!!!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on August 01, 2010, 11:01:17 PM

And I managed to zoom the DVDCol forum page and now I don't know how to go back to normal  :hysterical:

I did that once..it about made me crazy till I figured out how to fix it.  I think that time I actually had some help from a cat sitting on my keyboard.  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on August 02, 2010, 03:33:08 AM
In Internet Explorer the yoom button (shows a percentage) is usually in the bottom right corner of the screen. If just clicked it goes 100-125-150-100. If the "pull up" is activated, other choices are available.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Sanuye on August 02, 2010, 05:34:13 PM
You can learn something everyday! I never noticed that  :-[
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 02, 2010, 07:05:02 PM
In Internet Explorer the yoom button (shows a percentage) is usually in the bottom right corner of the screen. If just clicked it goes 100-125-150-100. If the "pull up" is activated, other choices are available.

A "Yoom Button"? What that do?  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on August 03, 2010, 12:30:38 AM
 :laugh:

It probably yooms...whatever that is.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on August 03, 2010, 03:49:00 PM
 :laugh:

That happens occasionally when you use an English/US keyboard at home and a german keyboard at work (for the alphabet only the Y and Z keys are swapped).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: kahless on August 03, 2010, 05:29:42 PM
:laugh:

That happens occasionally when you use an English/US keyboard at home and a german keyboard at work (for the alphabet only the Y and Z keys are swapped).

At work I have sometimes to deal with Norwegian keybord layout (http://www.uni-regensburg.de/EDV/Misc/KeyBoards/keys14l.jpg) - that's sometimes really funny with the umlauts and additional characters if you normally use the German keyboard.  ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 04, 2010, 08:05:15 AM
I was starting to hate that new mouse because it didn't behave the same way as my previous one. But I found the perfect game to "practice" on that new mouse and get a feel of how it behaves: Plants vs Zombies (http://store.steampowered.com/app/3590/). I just lost 3 hours to it  :bag:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Sanuye on August 05, 2010, 01:08:25 AM
I practiced on Hammer Heads (http://www.popcap.com/games/free/hammerheads)  :bag:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on August 05, 2010, 02:51:39 AM
Plants vs. Zombies and Hammer Heads are both from PopCap and therefore the digital equivalent of crack.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 06, 2010, 06:12:53 AM
Plants vs. Zombies and Hammer Heads are both from PopCap and therefore the digital equivalent of crack.

You can say that again!

I tried Hammer Heads, not my cup of tea. But Plants vs Zombies? I just can't get enough! And I usually hate tower defense style games... But it's all the little variations they put in that are so much fun.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 06, 2010, 06:25:59 AM
Doctor Who: Series 2
WHAT THEY SAY
Episode list
1. The Christmas Invasion
2. New Earth
3. Tooth And Claw
4. School Reunion
5. The Girl In The Fireplace
6. Rise Of The Cyberman
7. The Age Of Steel
8. The Idiot's Lantern
9. The Impossible Planet
10. The Satan Pit
11. Love & Monsters
12. Fear Her
13. Army Of Ghosts
14. Doomsday


MY THOUGHTS
Still going strong from a great start in S1. David Tennant is a marvelous, if different, Doctor. Love him too!

I'll admit some episodes were a bit shaky. Not exactly bad, but far from great. But as always, the chemistry and play between David Tennant and Billie Piper kept it interesting.

And that finale.... I still can't believe it. Why? Oh Why? .... Ah well, guess we'll see how it pans out in S3. (Which I now need to acquire - pronto!)
 
RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 08, 2010, 09:32:34 PM
Damn! I finished the Adventure Mode of Plants vs Zombies the other day.. Very addictive game! ;)
But that credit song... Can you say earworm (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/earworm)!! I can't get it out of my mind!!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 13, 2010, 06:18:52 AM
Doctor Who: Series 3
WHAT THEY SAY
Episode list:
Special: The Runaway Bride
1.Smith and Jones
2.The Shakespeare Code
3.Gridlock
4.Daleks in Manhattan
5.Evolution of the Daleks
6.The Lazarus Experiment
7.42
8.Human Nature
9.The Family of Blood
10.Blink
11.Utopia
12.The Sound of Drums
13.The Last of the Time Lords


MY THOUGHTS
Wow! What a series! I love it - through and through.

I loved the Shakespeare episode with the word powered witches with Shakespeare as the word master. It was really well.

The whole series was well done. I loved Freeme Agyeman as the companion. I was concerned, because I had grown to really like Rose, but turns out Martha Jones is really good.

And those final three episodes. Wow. Quality TV. Loved every second of it! I love The Master as an antagonist. Oh and Lucy Saxon (played by Alexandra Moen) is just gorgeous! Look at how cute she looks when she bobs her head at 0:04 in this video


It also highlights something I really like about Doctor Who. They surprise you all the time. At almost every corner, you have no idea what's to come. Just take this above little clip. Just before what you see in that clip above, is all serious, and looking rather bad. Things are looking grim. And then, out of the blue, the insanity of The Master shows with that upbeat song just as the spheres arrive!

Brilliant!

And they somewhat repeat the process in the next episode - brilliant passing across what The Master is thinking


 :hysterical: Love it!

And how better to create anticipation than by having the Tardis crashed into by... The Titanic!

Can't wait to know what happened!

Our friends the British sure know how to make good TV - I've yet to be disappointed in my choice from there. :thumbup:
Granted - I've been pretty selective about it! hahaha

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 13, 2010, 07:05:25 PM
Glad you enjoyed it! John Simm is fantastic as The Master and the moment the Doctor pulls himself back together is wonderful.

For more British TV brilliance, you can do no wrong with John Simm again in Life On Mars, which is simply awesome. The follow up, Ashes To Ashes hit it's stride after a wobbly start and the recent ending was a TV highlight of all time for me. :thumbup:

Another Doctor Who angle is the recent Sherlock, a modern retelling of Sherlock Holmes. Matt Smith, the current Doctor Who, and Sherlock actor Benedict Cumberbatch both auditioned for each others roles, I believe. It's written by Stephen Moffat who is the new chief Who writer and has been involved heavily for some time. You can really see the links between the series.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 13, 2010, 09:31:08 PM
I was looking the other day for Life On Mars.. I think there's a boxset coming for R1 with the british version of it.

Same with Sherlock. You posted a video of it the other (well I think it was you) and I loved it. I'm keeping an eye.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 13, 2010, 09:36:45 PM
Yeah, that was me. Pete had just posted his review of Sherlock Holmes, a film I do like, but suddenly feels a bit dumb and obvious now there is this version.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 14, 2010, 03:03:37 PM
I just started watching Torchwood Season 1 (spin off of Doctor Who starring Capt. Jack Harkness).

I like it, but what type of cameras are they using? It looks odd.. It looks flat, artificial, almost too clean.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 14, 2010, 03:06:13 PM
Hmmm, not sure. I never watched Torchwood properly as it didn't grab me. Apparently it improves immeasurably for series 2. Maybe that goes for the photography too!  ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 14, 2010, 03:52:58 PM
Well if IMDB is to be trusted - it seems they filmed with Digital HD Cameras at 25fps

I wonder if it could be the 25fps that's putting me off. I'm used to either film at 24fps, or NTSC at 29.97fps
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 14, 2010, 04:00:33 PM
It would make sense. Digital HD has been coming in slowly for certain productions.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on August 15, 2010, 07:13:33 AM
I just started watching Torchwood Season 1 (spin off of Doctor Who starring Capt. Jack Harkness).

I like it, but what type of cameras are they using? It looks odd.. It looks flat, artificial, almost too clean.

There are a few newer shows that I've seen a little of that I thought something looked off in them.  I think that's it..too clean and artificial looking.  It's just odd.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 28, 2010, 01:55:49 AM
Hmmm, not sure. I never watched Torchwood properly as it didn't grab me. Apparently it improves immeasurably for series 2. Maybe that goes for the photography too!  ;)

I does improve quite a bit with Series 2! Though Series 1 is already pretty good!

But I'm still not used to the Digital HD cams.. ;)

---

Also, are openly gay male superhero leads common in the UK?

Not that I'm complaining, especially since you could described Jack as omni-sexual, he'll hit just about anything: female, male, aliens, etc. But I was surprised when the episode "Captain Jack Harkness" (when we find out how he got his name) involved a slow dance and a male-male kiss! And it's not the only time it happened either! I was a bit taken by surprise on that. We definitely don't see it often this side of the pond.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 28, 2010, 10:33:19 PM
I've often mentioned our soaps on this forum and it's programs like Coronation St, Eastenders and Emmerdale that are popular and good enough to be able to gently push the edge of what is accepted. I think Eastenders had the first male gay kiss in about 87? Still, I preferred Brookside's storyline with a young Anna Friel...  :devil:



Bear in mind soaps get shown at peak viewing times, like early evening, so yes, it is accepted.

They've come so far now, a show like Emmerdale has had a host of gay characters with very substantial and intelligent story-lines. It is absolutely accepted across the board now, but still, Russell T. Davies deservedly got a great deal of credit for going one step further and doing so in a sci-fi genre show. Doctor Who is at heart a children's show, but Captain Jack is well defined character even then.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 28, 2010, 11:09:21 PM
Doctor Who is at heart a children's show, but Captain Jack is well defined character even then.

On Doctor Who, the gay undertones of Jack Harkness aren't present, or at least very toned down. I didn't really notice any. He's even going openly after Rose, and then Martha later on.

It's really on Torchwood that they explore his open minded sexuality. And it makes sense for the character. After all, he's a 51st century Timecop that ended up stuck in the 18th century waiting for the Doctor. And at the time he got stuck, he had already lived quite a bit. And since he can't die, and they make it clear that he's stuck in the 18th century having to wait for the Doctor to come back, for which "the century will turn twice", means Jack has lived a looooong time. So it really makes sense that he would seek comfort with whoever, or dare I say whatever. Afterall, in a sense, he's not human anymore.

It's unrelated, but I'm currently watching an episode that shows how each member of Torchwood ended up being recruited. It's funny because for Jack, instead of saying so-and-so years ago, they say "1,392 deaths earlier". Thought it was funny! :)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on August 29, 2010, 12:02:26 AM
On Doctor Who, the gay undertones of Jack Harkness aren't present, or at least very toned down. I didn't really notice any. He's even going openly after Rose, and then Martha later on.

Well, it's a while since I saw it, but I distinctly remember the way he looked at the Doctor very early on...  ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 29, 2010, 12:49:21 AM
On Doctor Who, the gay undertones of Jack Harkness aren't present, or at least very toned down. I didn't really notice any. He's even going openly after Rose, and then Martha later on.

Well, it's a while since I saw it, but I distinctly remember the way he looked at the Doctor very early on...  ;)

Maybe I just didn't notice until Torchwood because in Torchwood.. well they are not undertones. It's right-smack-in-your-face-tones!  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on August 29, 2010, 12:52:12 AM
Argh! I hate that!  :voodoo:

I've been lucky so far with those, but it seems I'm having a streak of bad luck.

What do I mean? Bad discs.

Disc 4 of Torchwood Series 2 is bad. Right at the end of the season finale (ring a bell? Happened not too long ago on Farscape  :voodoo:)

Fortunately, I haven't bought them all that long ago, and I've just found the receipt! So I'll go see tomorrow if I can't get them to exchange it.

Oh and to make matters worse, I think it killed off my on-the-brink DVD reader! Good that they are cheap these days..
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on August 29, 2010, 12:58:06 AM
Happen to me with my copy of Postal. It works fine when I did the profile, but when I decide to watch it 6 or 7 months later it freezes in the middle... Of course it was too late to get a replacement after all this time, maybe I would have tried if I would got it from Amazon but since it was from Walmart it was a lost cause...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 03:02:48 AM
I'm currently watching Doctor Who Series 4 - and in it, The Doctor has a new companion. Donna Noble.

Now, in Series 3's Xmas Special, Donna was featured. I found her a bit annoying. So when I saw she'd be the replacement for Series 4 I got concerned.

But my oh my is she growing on me! I love her! And I'm finding she's the most beautiful of them all so far too! I must be getting older...  ;)

Rose Tyler - Series 1 & 2
Martha Jones - Series 3
Donna Noble - Series 4
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/drwho/Rose.jpg)
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/drwho/Martha.jpg)
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/drwho/Donna.jpg)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 05, 2010, 03:17:24 AM
Over Billie? Yeah, you're getting older! ;) mind you, the current assistant is a cracker...

But Donna made for the most satisfying assistant arc I think. She is independent and not besotted. Some of her lines are brilliant. I love the sequence of her and the Doc meeting again! The little fat creatures are fun too.

The Christmas special wasn't taken as seriously I think because it was probably supposed to be a one off with Donna. What you probably don't know is that Catherine Tate is a very popular commedienne with her own sketch show and catchphrases, so it was a real novelty to see her in this.

Search Youtube for "Catherine Tate Nan"... :D

If you still find her attractive, there's no hope for you and your definitely old! :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 04:16:56 AM
Over Billie? Yeah, you're getting older! ;) mind you, the current assistant is a cracker...

Ok I'm going to assume that by "cracker" you mean that she is attractive (http://www.peevish.co.uk/slang/c.htm) - because the meaning I am finding looking on the net doesn't mean that (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=cracker) - at all!

And well.. In the pictures I've seen of her in-role for Amy Pond (http://ravenballa.wordpress.com/2010/04/04/amy-pond/).. Yes, she looks great. But in the everyday pictures I've found (http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1674611968/nm2394794)? Not so much ... ;)

But yeah, there is "hotness" potential.

But as of today, I still prefer Donna. For better or worse.

And yes, over Billie. I actually find Martha more attractive than Billie.

Search Youtube for "Catherine Tate Nan"... :D

If you still find her attractive, there's no hope for you and your definitely old! :tease:

 :hysterical:

She definitely looks much better in Doctor Who!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 05, 2010, 12:15:53 PM
"What a f***in' liberty!"  :laugh:

Yes, sorry, "cracker" as in :drooling:. I'm not sure where it comes from. But one might also say, "Blimey, luv. You've gorra crackin' arse."

Not me. I wouldn't say something like that. Liable to get walloped! :-[

Oh. "Wallop" as in to "hit".  :P

That picture of Karen is a bit unfortunate you found. Half the spell is her accent though, and frankly, her very first scenes are a bit persuasive...

(http://media.ove.cybermage.se/2010/07/karen-gillan-amy-pond-as-kissogram-cop.jpg)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 04:34:53 PM
That picture of Karen is a bit unfortunate you found. Half the spell is her accent though, and frankly, her very first scenes are a bit persuasive...

Damn! Is that standard issue police uniform?  :drooling:

But I don't know.. I'll have to see when Series 5 is finally released here (November) and see. Especially if you say her accent sells her.


But I'm concerned about Matt Smith as the Doctor.. and I hear they also changed the opening? the logo? and the theme?  :slaphead:

Why?

This:


Is supposedly more appropriate than this:


And in all fairness.. I actually prefer the very first theme of the revived series:


Why change it? It was fine!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 05, 2010, 04:44:35 PM
Well, it's ok. Stephen Moffat has taken over fully, so it has a new slightly new favour. We do tend to tweak our shows more than you lot!

I really like Matt Smith as the Doctor. The opening scenes of episode 1 were great. Following couple of stories were weak, but once in the swing of things, it took off.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 10:07:14 PM
Torchwood
Torchwood: Season 1
Torchwood: Season 2
WHAT THEY SAY
Separate from the government, outside the police, beyond the United Nations: Torchwood sets its own rules. Led by the enigmatic, ever watchful Captain Jack Harkness, the Torchwood team delves into the unknown and fights the impossible.

From an underground base built on a rift in time and space, the team responds to any alien threat – a meteorite crash landing, sightings of extra-terrestrial technology, an unusual autopsy report, the spread of a deadly alien virus... Everyone who works for Torchwood is young, under 35. Some say that's because it's a new science. Others say it's because they die young.

MY THOUGHTS
I'm really liking this darker, more "mature" Doctor Who spin-off. I have to admit though I think it lacks that magic, that simple innocence that Doctor Who has.

On Doctor Who, it's all about hope and how people can be redeemed and how life, in all its forms, is great.

On Torchwood, it's a bit gloom and doom. There's some really dark stuff going on. The way some situations are resolved... I'm not sure the Doctor would be too proud of Torchwood.

Anyways, enough comparing both shows. They are aiming for completely different targets, and to me, I have to admit, both work. The cast of Torchwood is great. Tosh, Ianto, Gwen, Captain Jack, even Owen I grew to like. I also like that they came up with their own aliens. Of course you have some aliens who appear in both shows, but there are many who appeared only on Torchwood. Gives it more diversity.

Good show. It may be trying a bit too hard to differentiate itself from Doctor Who and going for a more mature audience, but still. It's good stuff. Can't wait to watch Series 3 (only 5 episodes - but I hear there's a 4th planned for 2011! Yay!)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 10:20:04 PM
Doctor Who: Series 4
WHAT THEY SAY
Hot on the heels of the acclaimed third series, Doctor Who returns for a fourth instalment with a familiar face alongside the Doctor. Award-winning actor Catherine Tate returns as the Doctor's new companion, reprising her role as Donna Noble who featured in the 2006 Christmas special The Runaway Bride. Now reunited, the Doctor and Donna travel back to Pompeii in AD 79 on the eve of the infamous eruption where people are slowly turning to stone, investigate a series of grisly murders with the help of Agatha Christie, journey to the home world of the sinister Ood and come face to face an old enemy of the Doctor's. Series Four also sees the return of the Doctor's previous companions - the vivacious Rose Tyler (Billie Piper) and the feisty Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman).

MY THOUGHTS
Oh. My. Gosh.

What a finale! I was literally on the edge of my seat the whole time! And so many past characters are back. I love how they brought together the spin off series (Torchwood and Adventures of Sarah Jane) and how it all integrated together. That finale was massive! Don't want to spoil anything, but, it was completely awesome! Everything a fan could ask for! And to think.. this season started with the Titanic! I mean how cool is that?

We got to see Pompeii and Vesuvius, a planet made of Diamond, the Sontarans are introduced, the Shadow Proclamation, the Ood, and Donna Noble stole my heart.

Donna Noble .... poor Donna Noble. Her story comes to an end, but just how heartbraking was it? Mr Davies got me twice during this final two parter. I rarely get emotional watching a film or TV.. But they got me. Twice. The reunion of The Doctor and Rose.. and again at the end with Donna.

I'm really sad that it's the end of Donna Noble. Well.. I probably shouldn't say that - It's Doctor Who after all! Anything's possible! But .. oh well.

No big cliffhanger though this time. I'm surprised. Series 4 just ends. With the Doctor alone aboard the Tardis. But really, with what just happened, how else to end it?

Again, great season, can't wait for more!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 05, 2010, 10:34:26 PM
Torchwood
Torchwood: Season 1
Torchwood: Season 2


I didn't see the short season 3, but it proved popular, despite confusing the cast by all accounts. It was essentially a mini-series, one story screened over five nights. I think they were expecting to be busier...  :laugh:

As to... "I'm not sure the Doctor would be too proud of Torchwood", he definitely isn't! On the episode where Torchwood was introduced he made his feelings clear. I believe it's the one where the Daleks are invading and he has to send them through to another dimension? Also, I believe that the original Torchwood was created by Queen Victoria after she met the Doctor. She was pleased he had saved the day as usual on the occasion, but she took him as proof of alien existence and set-up Torchwood to defend the earth, including against the Doctor if felt necessary!

Of course he has softened toward them somewhat, but he'll never completely trust them. Same with Unit who I think Martha and Mickey end up working for? I lose track...   :stars:

I thought Donna's arc was just sublime and that ending was powerful. Again, they usually allude to a romantic angle with the assistant, but here it's clear, the Doctor is just lonely.

Season 5... is just awesome. It builds on that angle so beautifully and if the ending of this season has got to you, well, you ain't seen nothing yet. Dark sides are explored and considered. ;)  I'll put you out of your misery on one score, Donna is back in it, though not in a huge capacity. She is important, but only for one point in the series (the ending of series 4 has not been undermined). However, her grandad, Wilf? Another matter entirely. He has a simple line of dialogue toward the end that will take your breath away...  :devil:

Sorry, I should clarify. Wilf doesn't turn out to be some evil overlord or anything, he is just Wilf, but my goodness. How they employ him in the plot is fantastic. :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 10:59:45 PM
As to... "I'm not sure the Doctor would be too proud of Torchwood", he definitely isn't! On the episode where Torchwood was introduced he made his feelings clear. I believe it's the one where the Daleks are invading and he has to send them through to another dimension? Also, I believe that the original Torchwood was created by Queen Victoria after she met the Doctor. She was pleased he had saved the day as usual on the occasion, but she took him as proof of alien existence and set-up Torchwood to defend the earth, including against the Doctor if felt necessary!

Well actually, if memory seves, Queen Victoria created Torchwood to protect Earth against The Doctor himself. The mandate expanded somewhat over the years. And when it was turned over to Captain Jack (on the eve of the year 2000), he tried to turn it into something to help the Doctor because The Doctor may not always be present when Earth needs defending. But Jack still has human roots. 51st century roots, but human nonetheless. With the good, and the bad ;)

Of course he has softened toward them somewhat, but he'll never completely trust them. Same with Unit who I think Martha and Mickey end up working for? I lose track...   :stars:

Yep! Martha started working for Unit shortly after leaving the Doctor. It is implied that Mickey will join either Torchwood or Unit - as he leaves with both Jack and Martha at the end of Journey's End (Series 4 finale).

I thought Donna's arc was just sublime and that ending was powerful. Again, they usually allude to a romantic angle with the assistant, but here it's clear, the Doctor is just lonely.

Oh yeah, definitely agree with you there. I really loved how Donna challenges the Doctor in a best mate way, instead of a romantic one.

Season 5... is just awesome. It builds on that angle so beautifully and if the ending of this season has got to you, well, you ain't seen nothing yet. Dark sides are explored and considered. ;)  I'll put you out of your misery on one score, Donna is back in it, though not in a huge capacity. She is important, but only for one point in the series (the ending of series 4 has not been undermined). However, her grandad, Wilf? Another matter entirely. He has a simple line of dialogue toward the end that will take your breath away...  :devil:

Sorry, I should clarify. Wilf doesn't turn out to be some evil overlord or anything, he is just Wilf, but my goodness. How they employ him in the plot is fantastic. :thumbup:

I'm so glad to hear Wilf is back in some way! Love him! That bit where he shoots a Dalek in the "eye" with a paint gun? Loved it! Especially the Dalek's response "My vision is not impaired"  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 05, 2010, 11:25:42 PM
Season 5... is just awesome. It builds on that angle so beautifully and if the ending of this season has got to you, well, you ain't seen nothing yet. Dark sides are explored and considered. ;)  I'll put you out of your misery on one score, Donna is back in it, though not in a huge capacity. She is important, but only for one point in the series (the ending of series 4 has not been undermined). However, her grandad, Wilf? Another matter entirely. He has a simple line of dialogue toward the end that will take your breath away...  :devil:

Sorry, I should clarify. Wilf doesn't turn out to be some evil overlord or anything, he is just Wilf, but my goodness. How they employ him in the plot is fantastic. :thumbup:

Wait. Wait. By Season 5, do you mean the David Tennant specials? Or the Matt Smith Series 5? Because I was just about to watch the first special "The Next Doctor" and I see Catherine Tate mentioned in the episode guide booklet that is in the "Complete Specials" boxset. Which are the 5 specials following Series 4 (The Next Doctor, Planet of the Dead, The Waters of Mars, End of Time Part 1 & 2) before Matt Smith's arrival..

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 05, 2010, 11:47:47 PM
Oh bugger. Yes you're right, I forgot! Tennant's run was brought to a close in the specials. Sorry for the confusion! :bag:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 06, 2010, 12:13:05 AM
Oh bugger. Yes you're right, I forgot! Tennant's run was brought to a close in the specials. Sorry for the confusion! :bag:

No problem. My fault for being so far behind ;)

I was just watching the 2008 Doctor Who Proms Concert - Love the concept. Lure people in with a Doctor Who themed concert, and pass off some classical music in the lot  :thumbup: (unfortunately, they cut all the non-who music for the DVD, oh well)

But it seems Donna Noble was really liked!

At different points in the concert, they played Rose, Martha and Donna's themes. And Donna got the biggest reaction... by far! It may also be because she was more "fresh" in the memories of the people.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 06, 2010, 12:45:13 AM
To be absolutely fair, I think it would be because Donna was the current assistant. Rose is the one who everyone talks about as having the biggest impact. On the other hand, there is quiet and substantial respect for Donna. Deserved, of course.

By the way, we mentioned Smith earlier and the changes to the credits and what-not. I just watched another episode (I have them queued on my Virgin media box as for some reason I kept running out of time to watch them; you've inspired me to catch up!) and remembered they've also tweaked the Tardis in line with Matt's interpretation, which has brought back the madness of the character. There are several gizmos in the controls which have the weirdest uses!

Anyway, to put things in perspective, the episode I just watched (The Lodger) could be my favourite of any series. It is a perfect episode and captures the essence of Smith's Doctor and uses it deliver a story that in turn captures the essence of what the show is actually about. It's absolutely wonderful! Guest starring James Corden, another popular comedian who can handle drama.

This season has had several stand out episodes. One I enjoyed was outrageously sentimental and contrived, but still worked (they visit Van Gogh), plus has an instance of the word we discussed earlier: the Doctor compliments Bill Nighy on his bow tie, calling it a "cracker".  ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 07, 2010, 05:46:59 AM
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
WHAT THEY SAY
THE WATERS OF MARS
Mars, 2059. Bowie Base One. Last recorded message: "Don't drink the water. Don't even touch it. Not one drop."

MY THOUGHTS
Just finished watching "The Waters of Mars"...

I found it pretty run of the mill, almost boring actually ... ... until the Doctor went all "I'm the King of Time" badass mode!

The Doctor Victorious! Actually changing key fixed events in time!

Woah! Didn't see that coming. The Doctor. Actually breaking down.

It makes sense with all that's happened to him, but to actually do it? It's so out of character. Can't wait for what's in store for End of Time! I mean, after how things go down on Mars, to then move on to End of Time with all that's been foreshadowed? Even just that preview looked awesome!

And Lucy Saxon (http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Lucy_Saxon) (played by Alexandra Moen) is back!!  :drooling:

Can't wait!

RATING




Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 07, 2010, 05:59:00 AM
Doctor Who: The Next Doctor
WHAT THEY SAY
THE NEXT DOCTOR
Christmas 1851, and Cybermen stalk Victorian London. The Doctor discovers a spate of mysterious deaths, and he's surprised to meet another Doctor! Are two Doctors enough to stop the rise of the CyberKing?

MY THOUGHTS
That was a fun special. It's odd to have the Doctor without companion. And to go even as far as having The Doctor be companion to the Next-Doctor ;)

I love the Cybermen. They're like an unstoppable force. They just keep on marching, on and on. Their design is awesome too, with that little tear in both eyes.

And the CyberKing! When I first saw it rise, I was almost rolling my eyes. But then I looked at its design, and how it's pretty well integrated and the effect is well done. And in the end, a giant monster Cynermen taking over Victorian London on Christmas? Why not? It's Doctor Who! ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 07, 2010, 06:03:57 AM
Doctor Who: Planet of the Dead
WHAT THEY SAY
PLANET OF THE DEAD
When a London bus takes a detour to an alien world, the Doctor must join forces with the extraordinary Lade Christina. But the mysterious planet holds terrifying secrets and time is running out as the deadly Swarm gets closer...

MY THOUGHTS
Michelle Ryan! What's more to say? ;)

Ok. Ok. I liked it. Don't really know why, but I liked it.

That bit part, Malcolm I think, the scientist who closes the wormhole for the Doctor was quite funny!

Those fly alien were nice too. And the wormhole creating swarm looked great too!

Oh and Michelle Ryan! Did I mention Michelle Ryan?  :drooling:

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 11, 2010, 08:57:32 PM
It's funny. I came unto some videos for the new Doctor Who Proms 2010 and there's one in pacticular that is the introduction to the new Doctor Who theme song. It's presented by Matt Smith, and Karen Gillan and some other bloke is there.

It's funny because Karen almost looks like she'd rather be somewhere else. She keeps fidgeting and looks almost bored.

but ...  :drooling:

Them legs! And that cute little face there! Very nice laugh too right before the theme starts.



I may just end up liking her more and more in the end ;)

Even the new theme is growing on me the more I hear it. It's got a great energy to it. Especially when the choir joins halfway.  :thumbup:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: dfmorgan on September 11, 2010, 09:34:31 PM
This is the re-imagining of the theme that I like



Dave
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 11, 2010, 11:25:50 PM
The guy who played the scientist in Waters of Mars is Lee Evans. They do have a habit of employing the top comedians for cameos! Peter Kay was in an earlier episode a few years back.

Evans is known for in some ways as a Norman Wisdom type, but an absolute live-wire. He's dripping with sweat minutes into any of his stand-up routines.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 12, 2010, 06:32:57 AM
Doctor Who: The End of Time (Parts One & Two)
WHAT THEY SAY
Christmas Eve, and the Doctor is reunited with Wilf, to face the return of an old enemy.

MY THOUGHTS
Well, that's it. David Tennant's run as the Doctor comes to an end. But what a run it was! And what a send off!

Waters of Mars explored the darker side of The Doctor - a broken, bitter, depressed Doctor. End of Time actually builds wonderfully on that, with the Doctor actually working his way out of it, with help from Wilf (Donna's gramps).

Wilf has some of the best lines of the episode. (Though I haven't noticed that phrase that was supposed to take my breath away - see this post (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,741.msg125126.html#msg125126) by Jon - I must've missed it). Either way, the whole episode took my breath away.

Is it because I've watched it all in such a short time? Or just because it was really that good? Either way, I found the ending really hard to get through. Revisiting old friends, knowing these are the last moments of this incarnation of the Doctor. I got very emotional there.

David Tennant's performance was stellar. I mean, he's been good since he took the role, but here he's simply magnificent. And when he says "I don't want to go" right before regenerating....  :weep:

You know, I think Doctor Who just shot right up there as one of my favorite TV show ever. I really loved it.

And I'm sure I'll still love it come Series 5 in November. That small cameo at the end of End of Time might just have sold me to Matt Smith.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on September 12, 2010, 12:18:48 PM
Matt Smith's opening scenes are wonderful. He's trying different foods ("new mouth") and can't find one he likes... :laugh:

The line from Wilf I liked was very subtle:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 12, 2010, 05:35:22 PM
(click to show/hide)

Now that you mention it - I did gasp at that moment. And a big fat, unbelieving "Nooooo!" came out...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 13, 2010, 11:30:31 PM
Torchwood: Children of Earth: Day One
WHAT THEY SAY
An ordinary day becomes a world of terror, as every single child in the world stops. A message is sent to all the governments of Earth: "We are coming." But as a trap closes around Captain Jack, sins of the past are returning, as long-forgotten events from 1965 threaten to reveal the awful truth.

MY THOUGHTS
Bloody Hell!

What started out as a pretty standard mystery investigation by Torchwood is turning out to be so much more! And that's only after Day 1 of 5!

That cliffhanger!  :o

Will he? Will he not? :tv:

To think I was just about to start watching Lost starting at S1 ... glad I decided to give Torchwood a spin before I did!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on September 16, 2010, 03:13:32 AM
Torchwood: Children of Earth
WHAT THEY SAY
An ordinary day becomes a world of terror, as every single child in the world stops. A message is sent to all the governments of Earth: "We are coming." But as a trap closes around Captain Jack, sins of the past are returning, as long-forgotten events from 1965 threaten to reveal the awful truth.

Torchwood is forced underground, as the government takes swift and brutal action. With members of the tems being hunted down, Britain risks becoming a rogue state, with the mysterious and powerful 456 drawing ever closer. Captain Jack, Gwen and Ianto are helpless, as events escalate until mankind faces the end of civilization itself.

MY THOUGHTS
It starts out rather slow, but when it gets going it just takes off and never stops! I found it to be edge of your seat stuff. I loved it! It managed something that not too many series do - it kept my full interest for the whole duration of each episode! I never even once dozed off and felt like going online to check things out. That, right there, warrants full mark from me!

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 03, 2010, 02:45:49 PM
Forbidden World
WHAT THEY SAY
On the planet Xarbia, an experimental life-form known as "Subject 20" has been created by an elite group of scientists in hopes of preventing a major galactic food crisis. However, instead of prolonging life, Subject 20 is destroying it, and the man-eating organism poses a double threat because it constantly changes its genetic structure. Bounty hunter Mike Colby is called in to investigate but soon suspects that the scientists are keeping something from him, and he discovers why ... Subject 20 is half-human!

MY THOUGHTS
Decent little movie. Nothing too flashy, but effective in what it's trying to do. The creature effects and the "decomposition" effects are really well done. There's really something to be said about practical effects vs CGI. And this, while certainly not having the kind of budget big Hollywood productions get, still manages to look awesome with its effects.

I must admit, the single corridor set started bothering me towards the end. Namely, as Tracy is running away from the beast at the end of the movie. She runs up and down the very same corridor 4 or 5 times. I had already noticed that it was a single corridor, reused all the time. It made sense in that it's a space station on a far awar world, so it's logical that the design wouldn't be up to Martha's standards. But the corridor is a corner one with a door at the end of it. At least have the actress run the corner! Not just straight lines all the time. Oh well. It's a minor complaint.

There's also two instances where I don't understand why they interspersed sexy images almost like a subliminal message. One is about a third into the movie, where the security guy sees the alarm on a monitor and walks off to investigate. While he walks around, we get flashes of the hero having sex with one of the scientist. But the flashes are almost subliminal. No time to actually register. Why do it like that? And they do it later in the movie.

But despite all that, I still liked the movie. The girls were beauties, especially the bunette (Dawn Dunlap). The action was pretty decent. The atmosphere is good. The creature design was inventive. As an Alien rip-off (which Roger Corman openly admits to in the interview) it lacks the production value, but makes up for it by the investment of everybody involved. It actually shows you don't need a big budget to make a decent movie.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 04, 2010, 01:05:56 AM
Dawn Dunlap started her career in a french movie (Laura, les ombres de l'été (http://www.amazon.fr/Laura-ombres-l%C3%A9t%C3%A9-Maud-Adams/dp/B000BU9P50/ref=pd_bxgy_d_text_b)) in 1979. She is also in Barbarian Queen who is a part of this same Cult Collection. Just wait to see Lisa Glasser in Humanoids from the Deep ;)

(http://img40.imagefra.me/img/img40/7/10/3/aesp_pres/f_gods8onr6klm_93d7503.jpg)

Maybe I will try to watch it later today...

Looking at your banner it seems that you have seen the 2 version, are the difference big enough to warrant a watching?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 04, 2010, 01:30:35 AM
Looking at your banner it seems that you have seen the 2 version, are the difference big enough to warrant a watching?

I didn't watch the director's cut all the way through. But what I've seen is not much different. But the picture quality on the DC is almost unbearable. The voice of Sam (the robot) is also very hard to understand. Way too metallic, and there's no subtitles to counter it. From what I've read and heard in the interview, what was cut is the dark humor that Holzmann had put in. Corman didn't it and cut it out. I don't think I've stayed with the DC long enough to actually notice it.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on October 04, 2010, 04:23:48 AM
I read somewhere that the only footage that Shout! Factory could get a hold of for the director's cut was in really, really bad shape.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 04, 2010, 06:04:11 AM
It's because they weren't able to access the real theatrical master of the director cut, since it is store at UCLA and this university ask a lot of money to access whatever is in their vault. So the only material available was a tape master (wich isn't a VHS tape).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 05, 2010, 07:36:31 AM
Screaming Dead
WHAT THEY SAY
An abandoned insane asylum looms dark and foreboding on the horizon. Into it pass six individuals who are about to discover its terrifying secrets and come face to face with its blackest horrors.

Sleaze photographer Roger Neale and three beautiful models take up residence in the reportedly haunted old building -- an ideal location for Neale's photographic "study in terror." The hospital was financed by a depraved industrialist who built a hidden vault under the basement where he tortured and murdered hundreds of patients. Neale himself is a sadist, and he takes great pleasure in exploiting the helpless young women. But when he discovers a secret passageway, it leads to a blood-splattered dungeon...and into a supernatural world where pain and evil await mortal flesh.

MY THOUGHTS
Ah I'm so pissed! All because of the last 10 or so minutes.

The movie was building so well. Threading a fine line between voyeurism, exploitation and sadism. It was actually working towards asking some legitimate questions about how far you can go "in the name of art". When does art become voyeurism? When does voyeurism become exploitation? When does exploitation become sadism?

You had it all. Innocent young girls willing to do anything to get their career started, played marvelously by the three actresses. The down to earth big sister, again well played by the gorgeous Rachael Robbins. The weirdo artsy voyeur photographer, again with a great performance by the actor. There's the hero of the day ... though that guy was a bit shaky as the hero. But still, the rest of the cast made up for it. The story was interesting, pushing the limit slowly further and further.

And then it all crumbled.

Like I said, the whole movie was building so well towards a nice finale. And then boom! Deux Ex Machina. The hero saves the day by doing something so utterly unexpected, not explained, that doesn't even make any sense! And the gibberish "epilogue" - completely unnecessary, and actually detrimental to the whole.

It's so frustrating. It had the makings of a real good movie, despite the obviously teeny tiny budget and cheesy special effects (although they do their job).

I must add though that the movie looked awesome. Probably too good for its own good. They used 24p HD Cameras and the image is pristine. They probably could've used some of the grain of traditional stock film to hide the low budget effects. But for the scene where the three girls are together in a single twin bed? Gorgeous!  ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 05, 2010, 07:49:15 AM
Funny I just watch the same one, gave it the same rating and would explain it with the same reasons if I would have wrote a review...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 05, 2010, 08:10:04 AM
Funny I just watch the same one, gave it the same rating and would explain it with the same reasons if I would have wrote a review...

What's the saying? "Great minds think alike"?  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on October 05, 2010, 08:21:07 AM
Was that one from one of the movie sets you have?
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on October 05, 2010, 10:00:33 AM
Mine is from this set
(http://www.aesppres.com/phpdvdprofiler/images/thumbnails/612385006296f.jpg)
and I think Sebastien own the stand alone release
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 05, 2010, 04:06:53 PM
Yeah, mine's the stand alone release. The exact one shown in my review actually.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 09, 2010, 03:50:22 AM
The Addams Family / Addams Family Values
WHAT THEY SAY
Looking for something CREEPY...SPOOKY...KOOKY...and altogether OOKY?

Come join the Addams Family for twice the frights and gags and ghouls galore with the screamingly funny comedies The Addams Family and Addams Family Values!

Gomez (Raul Julia), Morticia (Anjelica Huston), Fester (Christopher Lloyd), Wednesday (Christina Ricci) and the rest of the most totally twisted family in history are serving up a banquest of tempting tricks and treats with two killer comedies that will leave you laughing your head off!

MY THOUGHTS
Wow! It's been a while since I last watched these two movies! Yet, I still could recite the first by heart, albeit in french, even after all that time!

It's funny because while I love The Addams Family for it's dark humour and just the way told and filmed, at the same find, I find The Addams Family Values just falls flat on its face. And I just watched them both, back to back, and my opinion still hasn't changed.

I find the first movie funny and witty, well written with some genuinely funny gags, both visual and spoken, and I like it's style. I think the main fault of Values is by trying too much to be funny. The school play scene is funny because it puts the Addams in a "normal" setting, but is short enough to still be "The Addams Family". Whereas the whole camp thing in "Values" is just too much. And there's plenty more examples of things that just worked in the first movie, that they tried to replicate in the second that just fall flat.

And it's odd because while the actors and crew looked fully invested in the first movie, like they are having fun playing it and doing it the best they can. On the other hand, the second movie reeks of cash in (studio involvement?).

Well, at least "Addams Family" is just as good as ever. "Values" is the "bonus movie" in the set, the one you don't really want, but it doesn't change the price of the set, so might as well get it ;)

I'm a bit sad though by the lack of french track in this. I don't usually do this, there are very few examples of it (Roger Rabbit, Slapshot and Spaceballs), but I would've preferred the french dub I grew up with. The film is still good in english, but I've seen this movie so many times in its french dubbing, it's like it lost something in translation. Some of the jokes I really did prefer on the french track. The guy who did Gomez's voice in french did really good job back then!

RATING
The Addams Family:
The Addams Family Values:

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on October 09, 2010, 01:09:41 PM
It's a while since I watched these! I may do again, now you've inspired me.  ;D I always liked Values too as well though. I loved the camp sequence with Wednesday exacting revenge. :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 09, 2010, 02:26:33 PM
It's a while since I watched these! I may do again, now you've inspired me.  ;D I always liked Values too as well though. I loved the camp sequence with Wednesday exacting revenge. :laugh:

The revenge scene at the play is awesome! Thing is, I find the build up in camp to drag on too much. It doesn't help either that I found the two camp leader annoying as hell! Sad though, because I do like the two actors playing them, but the roles themselves were annoying. Yes, I know, it was the point, but it just didn't work for me.

There's also, to me, a really gaping plot hole. How the heck would Fester fall in love for Debbie? Yes I get that he's desperate and jealous of Gomez, that he wants to be loved madly, but Debbie so doesn't fit the bill. I don't see any Addams falling in love with that kind of a lady.

Unless they want to imply that Fester is still an impostor and not the real Fester, which would be reaching too far and I'd probably be reading too much into it. ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on October 13, 2010, 03:37:07 AM
Started watching Fringe yesterday.  :clap:

Love it!

Just hearing the theme song makes me want to watch it again and again


Oh and how could I forget! It features a beautiful actress I had never seen before! Anna Torv:
(http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/9990/annatorvfringe.jpg)

and she has such a sexy, sort of raspy and deep voice! :drooling:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on October 17, 2010, 01:56:08 AM
I really like Fringe too.  I still need to get the second season.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 01, 2010, 02:53:15 AM
Been watching S1 of True Blood (since I don't yet have S2 of Fringe  :weep:) and just witnessed the first "live" vampire killing!

AWESOME!!  :drooling:

Now that's how a staked vampire should die!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on November 01, 2010, 03:07:11 AM
I witnessed that myself not long ago. It's disgusting isn't it? Especially the aftermath.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 01, 2010, 03:18:53 AM
Yeah, it's disgusting. But damn! That's going out with style!  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on November 01, 2010, 06:23:14 AM
I still have to watch my set of the first season of True Blood...though I did get the second season of Fringe.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 02, 2010, 06:07:39 AM
True Blood: Season 1
WHAT THEY SAY
Vampires have come “out of the closet” and are now living among us. Surviving on synthetic blood, they no longer need human blood to survive. Or so it seems…

The small town of Bon Temps, Louisiana boasts a wide array of colorful locals. Meet Sookie Stackhouse (Academy Award winner Anna Paquin*), a sweet and innocent waitress who hides her powerful ability to read minds; Bill Compton, a 173-year-old vampire who’s just moved back to town; Sookie’s brother Jason, a ladies’ man who can’t seem to stay out of trouble; tough-as-nails Tara, Sookie’s loyal best friend; Sam, the owner of Merlotte’s who tries to keep his feelings for Sookie to himself; Lafayette, a man about town who’s always cooking up something illicit and “off the menu” and a quirky cast of characters who each hide their dark secrets in the shadows of night in this series that’s like no other.

From Alan Ball, writer of Oscar-winning Best Picture American Beauty and creator of the Emmy Award-winning HBO series Six Feet Under, comes the critically acclaimed world of True Blood.



MY THOUGHTS
Just finished watching S1 today. I wasn't going to really do a review, but I have to say something.

I'm torn.

One the one hand, I loved it. The universe it creates, with the Vampire coming out of the closet and the hints to many other things being out in the open, is interesting. It also starts to build a nice little mystery in the first few episodes, featuring a new dead person in each, with all the hints pointing in a single direction as to who might be the killer....

... then Sookie has sex ...

and the whole mystery gets sent to the back seat, and all we get is: Sookie is happy. Sookie is sad. Sookie is angry. Sookie is happy again. Sookie is unsure. Sookie has to work. Sookie is having dark ideas. Sookie is happy again. Sookie is worried. Sookie is being stalked.

Oh by the way, sorry to interrupt Sookie's moping, but I believe we should be resolving the murders, don't you think? So here: The killer is that guy.

End of season.

I mean... Wha?? I get it. The show is about Sookie. Buuut Sookie is not all that interesting so far. And I must say, had the season finale ended when they caught the killer, I'd be done with this.

But, throughout the season, they've been planting seeds here and there, and the final 15-20 minutes of the episode are setting up some potentially interesting things for S2 and beyond.

I'll be getting S2.

But S1? On its own? Meh!

RATING
½



I have to mention though that some secondary.. well you could even say tertiary actors give terrific performances.

One that stands out is Tara's mother, Lettie Mae played by Adina Porter... Wow! You come to hate the woman. But the acting performance? Fantastic!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on November 02, 2010, 08:53:45 AM
One that stands out is Tara's mother, Lettie Mae played by Adina Porter... Wow! You come to hate the woman. But the acting performance? Fantastic!

I just finished watching season 1 of True Blood myself recently and out of everything you said the quote above is what caught my attention the most. I didn't mind Sookie, I suppose I can understand why she got on your nerves but as far as annoying characters go Tara's mother was almost too far for me. Tara is one of my favourite characters but every scene with her Mother was just so painfully frustrating that I considered turning off the TV more than once. I can usually deal with frustrating people in TV shows but this women seemed to have no redeeming features at all, and I found that any episode where she had a lot of screentime was hard to get through. I suppose the whole crazy ultra religious thing just rubs me the wrong way.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on November 15, 2010, 03:47:43 AM
As you may have read, I just got Doctor Who S5 and almost ditched Dexter when it came in.

I have started watching Dexter S1 a few days ago, and I was having a hard time getting into it. It was like not much was happening, and it felt like just one more of the CSI type shows out there.

Then the so-called "Ice Truck Killer" got revealed.

Things are stirring up nicely! I think they got me now  :clap:

Can't wait to see how that pans out  ;D
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 01, 2010, 04:47:56 AM
Dexter: Seasons 1 & 2

MY THOUGHTS
Just a few quick thoughts about Dexter.

I found it starts quite slow. The first episode is great. It establishes everything quite well and the narration by Dexter really adds as it allows us to peak into Dexter's mind. But after a few episodes, it starts to slump a bit, and to wander aimlessly. Then the S1 vilain is revealed and things get really interesting ....

.... and never stop! Right through to the end of S2! I loved season 2! All the cat and mouse chase about Dexter being found out or not. Doakes tailing Dexter the whole time, trying to find his secret. Really, awesome storytelling! Loved every minute of it in S2.

And Michael C. Hall as Dexter. WOW! He IS Dexter. He really made the character his own.

Of course, seeing Julie Benz again is always welcome, and was the initial spark for my interest in this series. Loved her in the role.. but I'd love her in any role! Something about her I find irresistible..  :drooling:

Good show! Can't wait to get my hands on the other seasons!
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 01, 2010, 04:59:52 AM
Doctor Who: Series 5

MY THOUGHTS
So.. Series 5. New Doctor. New Companion. New TARDIS. New theme song and infographics. New ceative head. New. New. New.

And you know what? I had my doubts but .... GERONIMO!!

Loved it! All of it! I found the introduction to the new Doctor really fun
"New mouth. New rules.".

I loved the storytelling in this one. It was much different from the previous series, but it was a refreshing new take on it. I loved all the little bread crumbs left around in each episode that pay off in the finale.

I love how Steven Moffat plays with time during the finale.

Doctor Who is still, 5(6? with the specials) series* in, a really fun show!  :thumbup:


* yeah I know about the older Who - I'm just not all that interested in the older ones. the new revival from 2005 is so good.

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 01, 2010, 05:04:20 AM
I've recently found Dr. Who on BBC America.  I had been meaning to look for it for a while.  Anyway, I've started DVRing it and I'm hooked now.  I want the DVD sets, but even on sale, they are kind of expensive.  But that won't stop me for long.   :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 01, 2010, 11:29:22 AM
Doctor Who is still, 5(6? with the specials) series* in, a really fun show!  :thumbup:


* yeah I know about the older Who - I'm just not all that interested in the older ones. the new revival from 2005 is so good.

I only liked the idea of the old ones. In practice, I never really enjoyed it, however you have to appreciate it must be one of the BBC's most popular series of all time and is still "canon". They have always had this fascinating ability to build the show around the current lead, so each one is a slightly different flavour.

I loved the episode in this series where he rents a flat! Ok, Amy "Oh my God, look at those legs" Pond wasn't in it much, but it was brilliant and I don't think David Tennant would have done it so well. Just as Matt Smith would have fallen flat in a lot of the previous series.

I also thought the Van Gogh episode was wonderful. Outrageously sentimental, but wonderful nonetheless, especially Bill Nighy's dialogue near the end. I'm no art fan, but it raised my appreciation for what the painter achieved and I'm sure anyone who does understand his art wouldn't fail to be moved.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 01, 2010, 03:01:16 PM
I loved the episode in this series where he rents a flat! Ok, Amy "Oh my God, look at those legs" Pond wasn't in it much, but it was brilliant and I don't think David Tennant would have done it so well. Just as Matt Smith would have fallen flat in a lot of the previous series.

That's what I actually like. They don't just change actors but keep the same character. They adapt to the actors style. The Doctor's personality changes with each iteration. And I like that!

Like The Doctor says in the first episode "Still cooking. Steering's off." (in the sense that it all changed - not that something's off ;))

And you know, while I did like Amy Pond.. she was aggravating at times. It's seems she always fidgeting. Almost like she has too much energy and just can't keep still. Hyperactive.

But look at her? How can you resist? That bit where she tries to seduce the Doctor.. how did he resist?  :drooling:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 01, 2010, 03:25:20 PM
But look at her? How can you resist? That bit where she tries to seduce the Doctor.. how did he resist?  :drooling:

What's that old saying about "rats" and "drainpipes"?  :whistle:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 01, 2010, 03:56:02 PM
But look at her? How can you resist? That bit where she tries to seduce the Doctor.. how did he resist?  :drooling:

What's that old saying about "rats" and "drainpipes"?  :whistle:

 :shrug:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 01, 2010, 03:59:27 PM
 :laugh:

"...like a rat up a drainpipe" is slang term implying swift eagerness.  ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 02, 2010, 01:34:52 AM
I watched 2 episodes of Torchwood last night from my DVR...still not sure who everyone is...or how Jack got involved in that...but I liked it.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 02, 2010, 04:15:52 AM
I watched 2 episodes of Torchwood last night from my DVR...still not sure who everyone is...or how Jack got involved in that...but I liked it.

You'll find out as the show goes on ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 02, 2010, 04:47:44 AM
I have no idea where in the series the episodes I saw fit...meaning I don't know if they are early episodes or from a later season.

The listing thing said they originally aired in October of 2007 I think it was.

Did the first episode have some sort of set up for the team?  Or does it just jump right in without an explanation?

Ohh..one more quick question.  Just to make sure I haven't lost my mind.  Jack in Torchwood is Captain Jack from the first season of Doctor Who isn't it? 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on December 02, 2010, 05:01:11 AM
It's the same Jack. Torchwood is Jacks spin off of Doctor Who. Sort of like how Angel left Buffy then made his spin off. Well sort of, as Jack was never a huge character in Doctor Who to begin with, but you get the idea.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 02, 2010, 05:03:45 AM
I thought it was the same Jack...just wanted to make sure.

Hmm..now just have to figure out if Torchwood is taking place after his time with Doctor Who...and how he got off that ...satellite thing.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 02, 2010, 05:14:02 AM
In the very first episode of Torchwood, everybody is already there except Gwen. So you basically meet the Torchwood team as Gwen is made part of it all.

You might want to make sure to watch the episodes in order though. It's a lot like Doctor Who. Not necessarily a season long plot line, but whatever happens in any episode has repercussions..

Forget what I said about Jack and Doctor Who's Series 1 finale
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 02, 2010, 05:41:11 AM
So far I've only found 4 episodes of Torchwood on BBC America.  I have no idea if they are in order or not. 

Well Gwen is already an established member if the episodes I've seen so far.  One had these creatures that some people though were fairies.  That was the first one I watched.  The second one had the team planning to camp out in basically the middle of nowhere to investigate the disappearance of like 17 people in that area recently. 

I still have 2 more episodes on my DVR to watch..and that is the last of them for who knows how long.  Torchwood isn't going to be on again within the next week anyway.  I'll see what the titles of the episodes are later.  I should have another Doctor Who to watch too.  I think the last Doctor Who I watched was School Reunion.  I like Sarah Jane.  And I figured out that she was in the old episodes I saw years ago.  I remembered K9 too.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 02, 2010, 05:47:31 AM
I was just doing some looking.  It looks like I started with episode 5 of the first season.  I also watched 6...7 and 8 are on the DVR.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 05, 2010, 06:09:37 AM
Jonah Hex
WHAT THEY SAY
OUT OF THE PAGES OF THE LEGENDARY COMICS AND GRAPHIC NOVELS STEPS JONAH HEX (Josh Brolin), a scarred drifter and bounty hunter of last resort who has survived death and can track anyone...and anything. Jonah's violent history is steeped in myth and legend and has left him with one foot in the natural world and one on the "other side." His one human connection is with Lilah (Megan Fox), where life in a brothel has left her with scars of her own. But Jonah's past catches up with him when the U.S. military makes him an offer he can't refuse: to wipe out the warrants on his head, he must hunt and stop dangerous terrorist Quentin Turnbull (John Malkovich). But Turnbull, now gathering an army and preparing to unleash Hell, is also Jonah's oldest enemy and will stop at nothing until Jonah is dead.

MY THOUGHTS
What to say? Guess you could say it's your run-of-the-mill, drab, soulless revenge story. Nothing stands out in this. A few pretty big explosions, some interesting weapon design. That's about it.

Boring story. Bland acting. Uninspired direction. Only redeeming quality, and that's not much, Megan Fox manages to not look like a tramp all the time. Guess that's something, considering she plays a whore.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Rogmeister on December 05, 2010, 04:06:57 PM
For what it's worth, I've been waiting for someone to review this movie!  ::)  I was tempted to see this movie since I am a western film fan AND I used to read his comic book back in the 1970s.  Of course, I heard this happened to be a pretty horrible film so I stayed away.  Now I'm glad to hear that seems to be a wise decision.   :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 06, 2010, 06:59:32 AM
Watchmen


MY THOUGHTS
Woah! This movie just drags on and on and on. And to make matters worse, I have the so-called "Ultimate Cut" clocking in at over 3½ hours!

And what happens over those 3½ hours? Barely anything at all! I mean, for a so-called "superhero" movie, they don't do much "superhero-ing". Oh sure, the few set pieces here and there are nice, but they are far and away, and not much to keep interest while connecting them together. But I have to admit, if you do stick around and trudge through it all, the fight scenes are awesome! They are gruesome, well choreographed, well photographed and heck they don't abuse the slo-mo surprisingly! I found it was done just right.

Also, I get that they call it "the ultimate cut" and all but... what's the point of including the "Black Freighter" segments? Mind you, I think I like them more than the movie itself, but still, why were they there?

So anyway, if after reading my review, and the others on this site, you are still interested in Watchmen. Do yourself a favor. Buy the Theatrical Cut. You won't have to wait as long between the interesting scenes.

RATING

Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on December 06, 2010, 07:21:41 AM
And what happens over those 3½ hours? Barely anything at all! I mean, for a so-called "superhero" movie, they don't do much "superhero-ing".
You went in this with the wrong expectation, disappointment was bound to happen. Maybe the trailers were misguiding, but this is not a superhero movie. Heck, there almost isn't even any heroes in this one :laugh:

However, your comment regarding the runtime and that it may feel too long is clearly a valid opinion.

Quote
Also, I get that they call it "the ultimate cut" and all but... what's the point of including the "Black Freighter" segments? Mind you, I think I like them more than the movie itself, but still, why were they there?
It's a fan service. It's in the novel, so they also put it here. I also liked it a lot and I thought it mirrored the main story rather well.

There is a Director's Cut, that came out earlier than this and only includes the added live-action scenes, or even the Theatrical Cut, which came out first.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 06, 2010, 04:05:45 PM
And what happens over those 3½ hours? Barely anything at all! I mean, for a so-called "superhero" movie, they don't do much "superhero-ing".
You went in this with the wrong expectation, disappointment was bound to happen. Maybe the trailers were misguiding, but this is not a superhero movie. Heck, there almost isn't even any heroes in this one :laugh:

I actually don't know what I was expecting. But I can tell you I certainly was not expecting costumed vigilante moping about previous glory with a backdrop of impending nuclear war. Especially not dragging for 3+ hours  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 06, 2010, 09:15:13 PM
I assume you haven't read the book. That, Sir, was your first mistake.  :redcard: The Tales Of The Black Freighter work brilliantly in the book, which also has a better ending (though an ending they really could not have done on film).

Basically, Watchmen was always unfilmable and Snyder has proved it. That said, I do think it's a great film and as good as it was ever going to be. Haven't seen the Ultimate Cut yet...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 06, 2010, 09:28:56 PM
I assume you haven't read the book. That, Sir, was your first mistake.  :redcard:

When did reading a book become a prerequisite to enjoy a movie?  :headscratch:

And you are right, I haven't read the book ... and don't think I ever will ...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 06, 2010, 10:08:22 PM
No, not a pre-requisite to enjoying the film (though a better understanding of the story would have helped), but simply because this particular story is truly unfilmable, as its subtleties and elegance are unavoidably lost. And now you are likely to always avoid the comic, which is one of the best ever written. It's a double-whammy and a shame.  :shrug:

I'm only pulling your leg though, because of course it's impossible to tell what adaptation gets it right and which one doesn't.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 06, 2010, 10:18:25 PM
I've never really liked comic books. I tried reading Frank Miller's Sin City and I just couldn't get into it for some reason...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on December 06, 2010, 10:19:39 PM
Bit over-stylised for my liking...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: goodguy on December 06, 2010, 10:23:26 PM
When did reading a book become a prerequisite to enjoy a movie?  :headscratch:

As I was saying in reply to Jon's review, I hadn't (and still haven't) read the comic and I was thoroughly surprised how much I liked the movie (director's cut) as a broody and mature take on the superhero genre.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 06, 2010, 11:47:06 PM
I did try a few comic books though, Sin City is the first that came to mind, because it's the most recent one I tried reading. But I don't care for them much. It's like they should really be using a few more pages and have each illustration less cramped. I get headaches trying to decipher it all  :bag:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on December 07, 2010, 01:02:42 AM
When did reading a book become a prerequisite to enjoy a movie?  :headscratch:
Never, usually when I've read the book I'm unable to enjoy a movie and it's easy to know why. I've already made the movie in my head while reading and no film can't beat my imagination (wich is not filled with bad CGI, headache inducing MTV edit, annoying loud music, bad casting choices and non-sense story changes).
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on December 07, 2010, 03:48:40 AM
I saw Watchmen before reading the comic and I liked the movie.  I ended up getting the comic after that.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 13, 2010, 03:54:52 AM
Started watching Bones (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0460627/) the other day.

I love it! I know it's not a comedy show, but I get almost the same vibe as Big Bang Theory. Dr Brennan and her assistant Zack are particularly funny in their total ineptitude at understanding basic human emotions. It is quite funny! Love the writing on the show. Some the side banter/dialog is really great!

And both leading ladies, Emily Deschanel (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0221043/) and Michaela Conlin (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0174819/)?  :drooling: :drooling:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on December 13, 2010, 06:50:40 AM
Can we expect that you will watch some Corman's films soon since I can't wait to read your toughts on them or the Eduardo Cemano's films since you have bought this set because of me?

Comic book films aren't really my cup of tea :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on December 31, 2010, 07:27:45 PM
(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/br_icon.jpg)  Back to the Future  (http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/br_icon.jpg)
WHAT THEY SAY
Experience one of the most popular movie series of all time like never before with the Back to the Future 25th Anniversary Trilogy! Join Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox), Doc Brown (Christopher Lloyd) and a time traveling DeLorean for the adventure of a lifetime as they travel to the past, present and future, setting off a time-shattering chain reaction that disrupts the space time continuum! From filmmakers Steven Spielberg, Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale, these timeless films feature all-new 25th Anniversary restorations for perfect picture and the purest digital sound available, plus hours of exciting bonus features.

MY THOUGHTS
Does this movie really need presentation?  And yeah, I watched it on Blu-ray.

The movie itself? Just as good as ever. I love it. Loved it the first time i saw it (though I have a slight preference for Part II, mostly because of how it integrates itself with this one), and I still love it, 25 years later. Not much more to say about the film itself.

Blu-ray? Ha! ... Ok, it looked AWESOME. Best quality I've ever seen this movie in. Now I know what Jon means about Blu-ray probably being more of a boon for older movies than for recent ones. It's incredible how much background detail come back to life here on Blu-ray! I even had to take out my DVD version to compare and.. yeah, Blu-ray brings out details that DVD misses.

One particular moment that jumped at me is when the time machine reappears at the beginning of the movie after Einstein's 1-minutes time leap. The camera is behind the DeLorean with Marty and Doc behind it, maybe 25-30 feet behind, and in the the background are trees, scrubs and the mall further back. You can easily make it all out. It looks clean and sharp. You can see difference in the greens for the leaves and stuff, the street lights (well, technically parking lights) are sharp and clean on screen, I wouldn't be surprised if I had a bigger TV that I could make out the sign of the store that there. On the DVD, it all looks somewhat muddled in comparison. (Can't wait to see Part III - I don't know why, but I have a feeling the "western" look will lend itself to Blu-ray quite well!)

The DTS-HD audio track sounds awesome! I think it's the first time I can say that I liked the sound of DTS over DD. I always felt DTS (on DVD) to be artificially boosted to make it appear to sound better than DD. Here it's all really well mixed and the level of sound details is amazing. Really, I never thought it could be that big of a step up. And keep in mind, I'm still listening with t he same 5.1 setup from DVD. Sure, my 5.1 decoder and speakers are THX certified and all, but DTS-HD wasn't even available when I bought them! That the codec is backward compatible AND manages to still sound better on older equipment? More power to them! I sounded great!

Now, I know, this all sounds overly enthusiastic and I can see a few of you jumping around saying "yeah! another convert"... but don't jump too fast. Sure the picture is, I have to admit, leaps and bounds above DVD. Sure, it sounds much better. But did it really improve my enjoyment of the movie? Hard to say, but I don't think I would enjoy the movie less on DVD than I do on Blu. So I keep my previous stance. For the same price? Blu all the way. Is Blu worth a 10$ premium (which seems to be the average here in Canada)... No.

Am I glad I got Black to the Future with "PERFECT PICTURE + PERFECT SOUND"? You betcha! But I got it at a ridiculous price (especially if you factor in the fact that it was paid by a gift certificate I received at Xmas  :laugh:)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 02, 2011, 12:37:17 AM
Well, first movie watched for 2011 is

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
WHAT THEY SAY
Game on! Scott Pilgrim just met the girl of his dreams.....literally. But in order for them to date, he must defeat her seven evil exes – a rogues' gallery – including an infamous skateboarder, a vegan rock star and fearsome identical twins! From the genre-smashing director of Hot Fuzz and Shaun of the Dead comes "a true original" (Entertainment Weekly) powered up by wit, action and groundbreaking visuals that you will want to watch again as soon as it's over!

MY THOUGHTS
Man I don't know if I'm just getting old or if maybe I wasn't in the right mood but.. this movie was so loud! Not only volume wise. It was like a full on assault on the senses.

At the beginning, I loved it. From the 8-bit Universal logo and music, to the comic book/gaming look. The fights are great and completely over the top, in a good way. The humour the action it's all good.

But clocking in at 2 hours, with not a single moment of rest? It becomes an unstoppable locomotive of overly loud sounds, overly bright images. I feel it's way overdone.

This movie would've been absolutely perfect... if I was still in my late teens / early 20s. Now? There was a time during the movie i was hoping to get the need to pee just so I could pause it for few a minutes to take a breath..

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: goodguy on January 02, 2011, 01:19:01 AM
This movie would've been absolutely perfect... if I was still in my late teens / early 20s.

Well, I guess I'm young at heart.  :laugh: I wouldn't call it perfect (some of the fights just dragged on a little too long and the ending is kinda muddled), but found it to be a very delightful surprise. And that's although I'm not even a gamer myself.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on January 02, 2011, 02:44:37 AM
 :laugh: Coincidence! Literally just finished wanting this myself. I know exactly what you mean, Sébastien, but despite all logic telling me it shouldn't work, I thought it was incredible. Very much a one-off and I doubt there are many directors who could pull it off. Embrace it and watch it again!  :P

This movie would've been absolutely perfect... if I was still in my late teens / early 20s.

Well, I guess I'm young at heart.  :laugh: I wouldn't call it perfect (some of the fights just dragged on a little too long and the ending is kinda muddled), but found it to be a very delightful surprise. And that's although I'm not even a gamer myself.

I'm glad you liked it, Matthias, but I can sort of see why. It's really very clever.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 02, 2011, 04:52:01 AM
Embrace it and watch it again!  :P

Oh I most definitely will. And maybe watching it after a normal week of sleep, instead of a full week of flu induced sleep deprivation will help my receptiveness.

Now that I had a few hours to "reflect" on it, I may have still been a little too out of breath when I wrote that above ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on January 02, 2011, 07:09:20 AM
Sebastien you must watch Vixen soon for me because Pete made me sad yesterday with his bad review :(

Of course you can watch Supervixen and Good Morning and Goodbye! also ;)
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 03, 2011, 05:26:20 AM
Vixen
WHAT THEY SAY
"Russ Meyer's Vixen will jar your senses...jerk your emotions...straddle your soul. The mind-boggling Erica Gavin...the standard by which all "'voluptua'" must be measured. Vixen...is she woman...or animal?"

Says Roger Ebert, of the Chicago Sun Times, of Vixen: "Meyer's best...a merciless put-on...Erica Gavin...electrifying!"

MY THOUGHTS
Jimmy asked me to watch and review Vixen!. So I did.

Despite everything? I truly liked it! I love the flow of the movie, going seemlessly from one scene to another. Erica Gavin pierces the screen. She's gorgeous! Let me say that again - she is G-O-R-G-E-O-U-S!

I love how the sex scenes are presented. They are portrayed as people having fun with each other, and not as boring "grinding-and-panting" that we usually see in movies.

Yeah, nice, fun escapism. Isn't that what film is all about?
 

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on January 03, 2011, 05:47:37 AM
Great review Sebastien :thumbup:

Really like the fact that you have appreciated the Russ Meyer's way of editing a movie, you don't get one second of boredom with the way he does it.

It's one of the rare film where the girl have the power and the control of her life (Vixen does what she wants when she wants). When you'll dive in the set you will see that most of the Meyer's film are like that ;D

Next time try Supervixen or Faster Pussycat...Kill! Kill! I'm sure you'll like them too. Good Morning ...and Goodbye! is my favourite of his film and star Alaina Capri (the best acting performance in a Meyer's film), but it's a different syle.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 03, 2011, 06:06:26 AM
Ok, now for a complete change of pace, yet we're still in gorgeous lady territory.

As you may know, I recently watched Doctor Who A Christmas Carol (Xmas 2010 Special).. and you may have read me saying I really liked Katherine Jenkins... well it may be more than that. I think I'm building up an infatuation with her!

I've bought all of her albums I could find. And I just can't stop listening. She has such a gorgeous and angelic voice! It's amazing! I keep getting goosebumps. And just now, she completely blew me away! Ok, it's gonna be a bit cliché but the song Nessun Dorma never fails to get to me. First it was Pavarotti's version. Then came Britain's Got Talent's Paul Potts.

And now Katherine Jenkins. I've always heard that song being sung by men. But to hear it, by Katherine. I could just melt. Right there.

Here's what it sounds like (keep in mind this is live and outside - the album is much more powerful)


 :weep: :weep: :weep:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 03, 2011, 06:11:59 AM
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on January 03, 2011, 07:15:40 AM
I really like her too.  I was ready to start looking for her CDs after I saw her on that talk show from England. 
Her singing in the Doctor Who Christmas Carol gave me goosebumps..seriously. 
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on January 03, 2011, 01:37:24 PM
Do I need to start filling in some paperwork to make you two honourary Brits? :laugh: You'll have to learn how to spell though... :whistle:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Critter on January 03, 2011, 01:39:34 PM
Do I need to start filling in some paperwork to make you two honourary Brits? :laugh: You'll have to learn how to spell though... :whistle:
:laugh:

Oh it's pretty easy. Just add a 'u' into all of the words where there should rightfully be one.  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 03, 2011, 05:17:14 PM
Do I need to start filling in some paperwork to make you two honourary Brits? :laugh: You'll have to learn how to spell though... :whistle:

Aren't I already one just by the mere fact we share a Queen?  :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Najemikon on January 03, 2011, 05:23:07 PM
Do I need to start filling in some paperwork to make you two honourary Brits? :laugh: You'll have to learn how to spell though... :whistle:

Aren't I already one just by the mere fact we share a Queen?  :laugh:

Get your own queen, saucy.  :-*

 :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Kathy on January 03, 2011, 05:25:04 PM
Buffalo is "The Queen City" which trumps your lonely Queen!  :tease:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on January 03, 2011, 05:29:09 PM
But she is the chief of our army and our chief of state also. The joy of being an ex-colony :laugh:

BTW why aren't we English citizen de-facto because of that :whistle:
The French welcome us French Canadian with open arms :laugh:

Buffalo is "The Queen City" which trumps your lonely Queen!  :tease:
You already have a Queen District (I'm sure it isn't the way it's called, but I don't know the real name :whistle:) in New-York, you sure love the Queen in your States :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on January 03, 2011, 05:36:54 PM
I know a few drama queens, does that count for anything? :P
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: kahless on January 03, 2011, 05:38:13 PM
I know a few drama queens, does that count for anything? :P

 :hysterical:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on January 04, 2011, 03:06:06 AM
Do I need to start filling in some paperwork to make you two honourary Brits? :laugh: You'll have to learn how to spell though... :whistle:

Doesn't my Doctor Who obsession take care of that? ;)
Heck...I've always had trouble with spelling..why change now?
 :laugh:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 05, 2011, 05:10:45 AM
District 9
WHAT THEY SAY
From producer Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings Trilogy) and director Neill Blomkamp comes a startingly original science-fiction thriller that "soars on the imagination of its creators" (Peter Travers, Rolling Stone). With stunning special effects and gritty realism, the film plunges us into a world where the aliens have landed... only to be exiled to a slum on the fringes of Johannesburg. Now, one lone human discovers the mysterious secret of the extraterrestrial weapon technology. Hunted and hounded through the bizarre back alleys of an alien shantytown, he will discover what it means to be the ultimate outsider on your own planet.

MY THOUGHTS
WOW! I loved this movie!

I loved the documentary look and how seemlessly the special effects integrate in the image. At times, I forgot they were special effects. The creature effects in particular are really well executed. The bipedal tank at the end of the movie is awesome too!

The movie has just the right amount of gore for the type of movie it is. Love the effects of the zapper with the exploding humans left and right!

And you know what makes this work so well? It is not too far fetched to imagine this happening in the real world. An alien ship lands on Earth. So what do we do? Ghetto them into a slum and exploit them. Typical. You don't even need to be alien for this to happen.

Anyways, great sci-fi action flick.

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on January 05, 2011, 05:17:54 AM
The Last Airbender
WHAT THEY SAY
Experience the thrilling live-action adventure based on the hit Nickelodeon series Avatar: The Last Airbender. Join Aang, an extraordinary boy with incredible "bending" powers, as he journeys through an exotic land filled with magical creatures and powerful friends. As the Avatar, he is the only one who can end the age-old conflict between the four nations, Air, Water, Earth and Fire. An inspirational journey, The Last Airbender is exciting entertainment for the entire family!

MY THOUGHTS
Ok, right off the bat, I've only seen a few episodes here and there from the animated series, so no comparison of the two for me.

As a whole? I enjoyed it. It's far the mess I was expecting from the reviews I read all around. I mean 6% on Tomato and 4.5 on IMDb? That's a bit harsh. I can understand being disappointed by it, but to outright hate it that much? There's not that much to hate.

Yes, it's a special effects movie, no question there. The so-called plot is there only to move the characters to new locale and give them some sort of reason to fight. Other than that, it's all about the fight. And you know what? While I would've liked it to have more "dancing" and more side effects from using the elements to fight, I still found the fights quite interesting and well choreographed. The element effects were really well done in pretty much cases, not much to complain about there.

I love during the final fight at the northern water city about the camera slows up to show the water picking up the Fire soldiers off the ground. All in all, I thought it really well done.

I really don't get all the hate this got, and probably still gets... Unless it's one of those case where you write and say that you hate it, but secretly, you have the burned copy in the bottom drawer ;)

RATING


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on January 05, 2011, 06:38:16 AM
I liked it when I saw it too.  Yes there were a few problems, but it wasn't as horrible as so many reviews claimed.  I enjoyed it.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 19, 2011, 03:08:14 AM
No! As you may, or may not, have noticed (just look at my watched banner!) I've been watching Lost again, from the start.

Everything was going fine, until I got to Season 5, Disc 5. The season finale of all things! Guess what? Defective disc!

I hate that ...

In retrospect? Really happy nobody took my single season releases back when I offered them ;)

Just hope BVHE will still agree to send a replacement disc ...
Title: Black Snake Moan
Post by: RossRoy on May 29, 2011, 07:09:11 AM
(http://www.invelos.com/mpimages/09/097363461968.3f.jpg)      Black Snake Moan (2006/United States)

(http://www.dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/DVDLogo.png) (Canada)
Director:Craig Brewer
Writing:Craig Brewer (Written By)
Length:115 min.
Stars:Samuel L. Jackson as Lazarus
Christina Ricci as Rae
Justin Timberlake as Ronnie
S. Epatha Merkerson as Angela
John Cothran as Reverend R. L.

PLOT
In this tale of love, loss and faith, Academy Award® Nominee Samuel L. Jackson ('Pulp Fiction', 'Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith') and Christina Ricci ('Sleepy Hollow') seek redemption Down South through the power of the blues and the transcendence of an unlikely friendship.

My Thoughts:
I liked it a lot. I didn't expect to like it that much actually.
The actors did a terrific job, especially Jackson and Ricci. I expected to be annoyed by Justin Timberlake .. but no. He sells the part well.
The music in the movie is great too.
A pretty good, if sometimes raw, drama, but with an uplifting ending.

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Achim on May 29, 2011, 07:43:31 AM
I had Blake Snake Moan and and off my radar several times. Just wish listed it again...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 29, 2011, 02:48:23 PM
Well, is it release day, full price worth? Probably not .. but it's been out a while, so you probably can find it pretty cheap, if so, Totally worth it.
Title: DOA Dead Or Alive
Post by: RossRoy on May 30, 2011, 04:30:29 AM
(http://www.invelos.com/mpimages/06/065935809210.3f.jpg)     DOA: Dead or Alive (2006/United States)

(http://www.invelos.com/images/DVDLogo.png) (Canada)
Director:Corey Yuen
Writing:J.F. Lawton (Screenwriter), Adam Gross (Screenwriter), Seth Gross (Screenwriter)
Length:86 min.
Stars: Jaime Pressly as Tina Armstrong
Devon Aoki as Kasumi
Holly Valance as Christie Allen
Sarah Carter as Helena Douglas
Natassia Malthe as Ayane

Plot:
Filled with non-stop action, eye-popping martial arts stunts, and hot, ass-kicking women, D.O.A. :Dead or Alive follows a group of super-skilled fighters from across the globe invited to a remote Pacific island to compete for the $10 million title of World’s Best Fighter. Led by pro-wrestler 'Jaime Pressly' (My Name is Earn and ninja princess 'Devon Aoki' (Sin City), the finalists must band together to defeat their sinister host. Featuring the hi-octane direction of 'Cory Yuen' [The Transporter), D.O.A.: Dead or Alive delivers a jaw-dropping, pulse-pounding, heart-stopping finish!

My Thoughts:
"Filled with non-stop action"?

Yep, that's pretty much it. There's some sort of background story, but, it's entirely secondary. It's all about the girls fighting, looking pretty doing so. And you know what? I enjoyed it! It was exactly what I was in the mood for today: mindless, beautiful, sexy, action. That's what I got.

Rating:
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on May 30, 2011, 06:34:33 AM
Not sure if sexy would be the first thing in my mind with a film starring Jaime Pressly :shrug:
She had one of the most annoying voice I've ever heard (even Fran Dreschner sound sexier...), enough to be an instant turn off for my brain.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on May 30, 2011, 06:40:00 AM
Not sure if sexy would be the first thing in my mind with a film starring Jaime Pressly :shrug:

I'm not talking about Jaime Pressly at all ..

I've always liked Holly Valance, and Devon Aoki is also really cute. Natassia Malthe is great too. And the girl playing Helena (Sarah Carter) is very beautiful too!

There's enough pretty lady to counteract Jaime Pressly hahaha
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Jimmy on May 30, 2011, 06:46:12 AM
The only one I knew is Natassia Malthe because of Bloodrayne 2 and yes she is kind of cute, she looks like a normal person and this is what I usually like. By the way she is also in Bloodrayne 3 that I've pre-ordered a couple of days ago.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: goodguy on May 30, 2011, 07:09:48 AM
I had Blake Snake Moan and and off my radar several times. Just wish listed it again...

Well, is it release day, full price worth? Probably not .. but it's been out a while, so you probably can find it pretty cheap, if so, Totally worth it.

Well, I just checked and I paid full price upon release. And I don't regret it either. It's a great movie, a serious (if somewhat simplistic) drama disguised as an exploitation flick, done with verve and style.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 05, 2011, 05:45:17 AM
I'm currently rewatching

(http://dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/DVDLogo.png)Smallville: Season 1.


I wanted to watch Season 8, but when I put the disc in and started watching the first episode, I was lost. I didn't know what was going on. So I was going to rewatch parts of Season 7 to get into it again, and thought .. why not from the start?  :laugh:

So here I am, watching Season 1 again. Getting hooked and loving just as much as before ... and getting as annoyed with Lana as before (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,759.msg70836.html#msg70836).

Really enjoying it .. all over again! 5 episodes to go in Season 1


Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on June 14, 2011, 02:16:15 PM
Just started watching Season 4 of Smallville yesterday.

(http://dvdalistic.com/dvdcol/DVDLogo.png)Smallville: Season 4.


I had forgotten just how much energy Erica Durance brought to the show. I love how she interact with Clark Kent. There is a chemistry between Tom Welling and Erica that just wasn't there between Kristin (Lana Lang) and Tom.

And I love that face Chloe makes in Façada (4x03) at the end after Lois dumps Clark in a pool of water by throwing a football unto a target and they start smiling flirtily at each other.
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: RossRoy on July 08, 2011, 06:25:34 AM
Well, all good things must come to an end. I just finished watching the series finale of Smallville, bringing a 10 years long journey to an end. And I loved it the whole way through! Right on through the last minute of the finale! It's funny because, I know I had that big silly smile the whole time Clark Kent finally endorsed Superman. And you know what? I'm feeling a little down at the moment .. it's over. There's no more Smallville to be watched.

I loved Tom Welling's portrayal of CK. Sure, it was shaky in the first few years, but he's grown as an actor along with CK. Makes you wonder if it was not just an act right from the start ;)

Erica Durance as Lois was just lovable. I said it before, but I'll repeat it here: Her arrival brought a new energy to the show, and it carried all the way through to the end.

Allison Mack as Chloe completely blew me away. Her smile alone makes me meltdown ...

And Lex .. Michael Rosenbaum probably is one of the better live action portrayal of Lex. Sometimes I just wanted to rip his gut out! ;)

---

Anyways, I'm really sad it's over .. I grew quite attached to the whole cast. Even Tess won me over after a time.

---

I'm torn now .. Season 10 is coming out soon, along with a Complete Series set. My mind was set on just getting Season 10 and completing the series and be done but .. I loved it so much, i'm starting to think maybe I should get the complete series on Blu ray now .. decisions decisions ...
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: addicted2dvd on July 08, 2011, 02:25:04 PM
I still need to buy Seasons 9 and 10. But I really could watch that series finale again. Wish I still had it on my DVR! :P
Title: Re: RossRoy's Random Viewings
Post by: Dragonfire on July 09, 2011, 05:12:19 AM
I still haven't seen any of this show...not sure why I didn't start watching it when it first started airing.