Members
Stats
Users OnlineUsers: 0
Guests: 79 Total: 79 |
Finding Nemo, a review by TomTitle: Finding Nemo Year: 2003 Director: Andrew Stanton Rating: FSK-0 Length: 96 Min. Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.78 Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, German: Dolby Digital Surround EX, German: DTS ES (Matrixed), Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo Subtitles: Commentary, English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, Turkish Stars: Englische Stimmen Albert Brooks Ellen DeGeneres Alexander Gould Willem Dafoe Brad Garrett Plot: When Nemo, a young clownfish, is unexpectedly carried far from home, his overprotective father, Marlin (Albert Brooks), and Dory (Ellen DeGeneres), a friendly but forgetful regal blue tang fish, embark on an epic journey that leads to encounters with vegetarian sharks, surfer dude turtles, hypnotic jellyfish and hungry seagulls! Awards:
Extras: Commentary Deleted Scenes Featurettes Interactive Game Kurzfilm "Knick Knack" Music Videos Photo Gallery Scene Access THX certified Trailers Virtuelles Aquarium My Thoughts: A great movie. The animation is wonderful. Dory is the most fun character in this movie. Too bad that I didn't watch it in the theatre.Rating: (From December Marathons - DISCUSSION AND REVIEW THREAD on December 24th, 2009) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, a review by Dragonfire
I am glad that the final book was split into 2 movies. There was just too much to cover and tie up for one movie...especially if Yates would have been able to hack it to bits again. There are changes again, though most of them don't bother me too much. Some things get a little condensed, which isn't too annoying. There is a stupid scene added in, again by Yates decision because he wanted to show the sexual tension - that is what he said - between Harry and Hermione. Ack. There was none between them. They were each in love with someone else and were just friends and for Yates to imply something else is messed up. I guess we are lucky he didn't have them make out. some of the characters aren't used enough again, but that happened in the book too. They are still clueless about what most of the horcruxes could be..though they sort of stumble into figuring out one. Harry has his piece of a magical mirror that Sirus gave him back in the fifth book...which has been left out of the movies completely, yet Harry is now pulling it out looking in it..and it is kind of important later on. This movie refers back to things that were left out of various books, so it really requires people have read the books to be able to fully follow and understand certain things. People that have only seen the movies are going to be lost on some things thanks to how things were cut in previous movies. Most of the issues in this one go back to things that weren't handled properly in previous movies. I do enjoy the movie overall..I just think it would have been even better if a few things were handled better. I did post a longer review at Epinions after seeing the movie. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (From Marie's Random Movie Viewing on July 15th, 2013) Pilot Season 2014-15, a review by DJ DoenaThe Leftovers The Leftovers @ Wikipedia The Leftovers @ IMDb Synopsis: One day, one normal day as the normal day before it, 2% of the world's population just suddenly disappear without a trace. Two years later. The world has changed. Some think of it as a biblical event, some have just learned to accept it and some have joined cults and groups. No one knows what truly happened that day and if it will happen again. My Opinion: I watched the pilot but not more. The whole setting just couldn't get me interested. Maybe I couldn't relate to it because it is centered around a small mid-western town and the reaction to that event is in all aspects very "bible belt American". At least it feels like it. And that's a world I usually don't tend to bother with. (From Pilot Season 2014-15 on September 14th, 2014) |