Recent Topics

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 17, 2024, 09:46:30 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Members
  • Total Members: 54
  • Latest: zappman
Stats
  • Total Posts: 111911
  • Total Topics: 4497
  • Online Today: 34
  • Online Ever: 323
  • (January 11, 2020, 10:23:09 PM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 32
Total: 32

Member's Reviews

Snow Falling on Cedars, a review by Jon


Snow Falling on Cedars    4/5

Though I've yet to record any of it here, I've been having a bit of an unwatched marathon. DVDs I bought cheap thinking I'd watch them when the mood hit and then it never bloomin' hit! Tonight I made the effort to catch up with this one.

At its heart, it's a simple courtroom drama set in a fishing community in the years just after WWII. A fisherman has been found dead, tangled in his nets. A Japanese fisherman is accused of his murder and so begins the usual round of prosecution versus defence, but with a backdrop of prejudice and mistrust against the Japanese community so soon, relatively speaking, after the attacks on Pearl Harbour. The Japanese have their own problems with trust. Despite loyalty to the US during the war, they were still shipped off to camps. They are afraid of an unfair trial. Meanwhile Ishmael, a reporter (Ethan Hawke) is quietly observing the proceedings.

The film is so much more than a simple drama though. It is more concerned with emotion and history. All the main players are dealing with their past, letting it form their own prejudices. The most important history is between Ethan Hawke's reporter and the wife of the accused because he's letting it influence a very important decision. They were lovers, split up by the war. Now he has found important evidence, but instead of handing it over, he broods, unable to truly let go of her. His father, a newspaper man outspoken in his defence of the Japanese, had recently died. Ishmael was never so convinced of his fathers unwavering support of the Japanese and is perhaps fearful to continue it now, so tries to stay neutral.

Usually I really enjoy courtroom stories, but I think what put me off for so long was some of the reviews. Good or bad conclusions, they spoke of it being based on a novel and how the film had matched its ponderous, poetic nature. Somehow I was never in the mood to be bored!

I wasn't of course. Far from it, in fact I was utterly enthralled. This is a truly beautiful film from the very opening shots, the sort where you think you could press pause at any moment, frame it and hang it on your wall. Of course, if you did that you'd be unable to appreciate the use of sound. It's as brilliant as it is ambitious, with scenes and dialogue overlapping in a manner that often contradicts what you see and highlights some emotional clash.

There's a lot of emotional clash. Just as with the sound, flashbacks pepper the narrative, drawing parallels between past and present. And these flashbacks are never highlighted; they drift in and out as if daydreams. They somehow feel more genuine that way, though it does demand your attention keeping track! The detail in some scenes is astonishing (a memory of a love scene), reminding me of a Terence Malick film, while in others, there is hardly any (fractured, incoherent dialogue when narrating a letter). Another sign of a genuinely intelligent and adult film.

In retrospect, perhaps some criticism is valid. Empire suggested that it is too ponderous, and that Ishmael moodily indulges a long time getting where he's going. But that's the point I think. That like many of us, a seemingly simple decision can be clouded by very human emotions and sometimes those clouds are thick.

Now if it was all thoughtful poetry, beautiful or not, the real trial would have been in watching it! Brilliantly, the trial on screen is a fantastic focal point though. The Judge (James Cromwell) and the barristers (Max Von Sydow for defence) have some great banter. Like a real court case, their scenes bring all the threads into sharp context, stripping away the emotion to leave bare facts.

I can't recommend this enough. Ambitious, adult, beautiful and enigmatic. Plus the story of Japanese-Americans was an interesting one I hadn't considered before. Truly, there are two sides to every story, and that could be this films tagline.

I hate to commit, but in some ways, this would appeal most to those of us who enjoyed Lost In Translation. I hasten to add though that that comment shouldn't put off people who didn't. This film lacks Translations commitment to evoking a constant mood. Instead, it builds up a mood, but then breaks it to, as I said before, demonstrate some sort of paradox.

Blimey. I went on a bit there! Sorry, but films like this deserve rattling on about. They are not always perfect, but the mere fact they try to bend rules and conventions demands support. So there.  ;)

(From Snow Falling on Cedars on January 17th, 2008)

Member's Reviews

The Blues Brothers, a review by Tom


MOVIE / DVD INFO:

Title: The Blues Brothers
Year: 1980
Director: John Landis
Rating: 15
Length: 142 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85
Audio: English: Dolby Digital Stereo , Italian: Dolby Digital Stereo , Spanish: Dolby Digital Stereo , English: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: Arabic, Bulgarian, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Greek, Hebrew, Hungarian, Icelandic, Italian, Norwegian, Other, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish

Stars:
Dan Aykroyd
John Belushi

Plot:
After the release of Jack Blues (John Belushi) from prison, he and brother Elwood (Dan Aykroyd) go to visit the orphanage where they were raised by nuns.

They learn that the church stopped its support and will sell the place unless the tax on the property is paid within 11 days.

The brothers decide to raise the money by putting their blues band back together and staging a big gig. They may be on a "mission from God" but they're making enemies everywhere they go.

Featuring performance by some blues finest: James Brown, Cab Calloway, Ray Charles, Aretha Franklin and co-starring John Candy, Carrie Fisher, Henry Gibson and Steve Lawrence.

Extras:
Extended Edition of the Film (142mins) on Disc 2
Featurettes
Production Notes
Scene Access
Trailers

My Thoughts:
Another movie everybody is talking about and I had never seen it. In the beginning I was a little vary and did not think that I will enjoy it, but thankfully I ended up liking it.
I liked most of the musical numbers and also the great car chase scenes everybody is talking about were just that: Really great!

Rating:

(From Two-Weeks Movie Marathon: Unwatched Movies on August 24th, 2008)

Member's TV Reviews

The Flash Marathon, a review by addicted2dvd


The Flash Marathon

Image: The Flash tries to talk some sense into Tina

Episode 13 - Tina, Is that You?
Tina is The Flash's confindant and doctor. But when a biofeedback treatment she devised for him goes wrong, she transforms into something else: leader of a girl gang that wants to kill the superhero.

Guest Stars:
Richard Belzer as Joe Kline
Vito D'Ambrosio as Bellows
Biff Manard as Murphy
Yvette Nipar as Lisa March
John Santucci as Big Ed
Denise Dillard as Shauna Duke

My Thoughts:
I enjoyed this one quite a bit. For some reason it is always fun when a main character, one that is always on the side of good, goes bad.... even if it is just for an episode. While "Evil Tina" was right mean pretty much the whole time.... she was even hotter then she normally is.

My Rating:

(From The Flash Marathon on April 25th, 2010)