Members
Stats
Users OnlineUsers: 0
Guests: 65 Total: 65 |
Day of the Dead, a review by addicted2dvdTitle: Day of the Dead: Divimax Series Year: 1985 Director: George A. Romero Rating: NR Length: 101 Min. Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 1.85:1 Audio: English: Dolby Digital Surround EX, English: DTS ES (Matrixed), English: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo, Commentary: Dolby Digital Stereo Subtitles: N/A Stars:Plot: In this third and final shocker in the legendary trilogy from writer/director George A. Romero (DAWN OF THE DEAD, NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD), a small group of scientists and soldiers have taken refuge in an underground missle silo where they struggle to control the flesh-eating horror that walks the earth above. But will the final battle for the future of the human race be fought among the living or have they forever unleashed the hunger of the dead? Lori Cardille, Joe Pilato, Richard Liberty and Howard Sherman star in this controversial classic with groundbreaking gore effects by Tom Savini and featuring the most intense zombie carnage ever filmed. This is the ultimate edition of DAY OF THE DEAD. Presented in a stunning new widescreen transfer with terrifying DTS-ES & Dolby Digital Surround EX audio, this is the darkest day of horror the world has ever known, like you've never seen or heard it before! Extras: Scene Access Audio Commentary Trailers Featurettes Gallery Production Notes Interviews DVD-ROM Content Closed Captioned From the Files of Dr. M. Logan P.H.D - 16 Page Booklet My Thoughts: I have watched this movie countless times... has always been one of my favorite of the Romero zombie movies. But this is the first time I watched this release of the movie after a good friend (Thanks Achim!) sent it to me. The gore in this one is really up there. Between the zombies tearing and and eating flesh and some of the scenes such as the doctor's experiments on the zombies and a dream sequence here and there the gore is plentiful and well done. I will say that there is some characters I dislike in this movie. But I think that is usually true of most movies. I would also say that some of the acting is a bit over the top. But if you can get past that you are in for a gory walking dead treat. I didn't get the chance to check out the extras disc yet... but looking forward to checking it out soon. My Rating: Out of a Possible 5 (From Addicted2DVD's November Alphabet Marathon on November 20th, 2009) Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, a review by DragonfireThis movie ties up everything fairly well and it is a good adaptation overall. The main differences come from things that weren't properly set up in previous movies. I still don't really like how Harry ends up being able to find the horcruxes, but it does work for the movie. It just seems like it was an attempt to cover up the fact that they screwed up the set up big time as far as the horcruxes were concerned. I really didn't need to see the snake as often as it was around, but I knew that would happen. I was really worried about how Snape's memories would be handled after memories have been screwed up in previous movies. Thankfully they were done wonderfully. Things were condensed a bit, and one very moving thing was added in that made the memory part stronger overall. It makes Snape more likable overall and shows that he is capable of feelings. I still love how Helena Bonham Carter plays it when Hermione is supposed to be Bellatrix. She looks the same but also different at the same time. The crazed look in her eyes is gone, replaced by the look of someone who is uncertain about what they are doing. It's wonderful. It really is amazing that all these movies were able to be made with the same main cast - except for Richard Harris who unfortunately passed away. There are a few continuity issues here and there that come from the changes the different directors did. The cast is wonderful, especially Alan Rickman. His part is smaller, but it is so important and he really shines in his few scenes. There are a few things that I would have liked to see from the book, though they were more minor things. I did post a longer review on Epinions after seeing the movie. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 (From Marie's Random Movie Viewing on July 15th, 2013) Tom's TV Pilots marathon, a review by Tom
Plot: The first superhero created for comic books, SUPERMAN leaped from radio to television when Adventures of Superman debuted in 1952. Produced by Robert J. Maxwell (who also produced the radio version) and Bernard Luber (a veteran of Hollywood serials), each First Season Episode screens like a classic crime movie, where danger and death lurk in the shadows. Working with some of the industry's best character actors, George Reeves plays the MAN OF STEEL with a genuineness that captivates viewers of all ages. Now, enjoy this legendary series as never before, digitally mastered from original film elements, in a soaring DELUXE 5-DISC SET WITH EXCITING EXTRAS. - Allan Asherman, DC Comics Historian The Adventures of Superman 1.01 Superman on Earth Writer: Richard Fielding (Screenwriter) Director: Tommy Carr Cast: George Reeves (Superman/Clark Kent), Phyllis Coates (Lois Lane), Jack Larson (Jimmy Olsen), John Hamilton (Perry White), Ross Elliott), Herbert Rawlinson), Stuart Randall), Aline Towne), Frances Morris), Dani Nolan) A good first episode considering the age of the series. Strange is the beginning. Jor-El is introduced by the council elder to be a highly regarded scientist who was given the task to look into the seismic activity, but then was ridiculed when he presented his findings, which could easily been verified. And this shortly after the introduction of Krypton having an highly advanced race. I didn't remember that the origin story was rather elaborate on this. We see Jor-El and the council on Krypton. Him and his wife putting the baby in the rocket. The Kents finding the rocket. And even scenes with Clark at age 12 and 25. Rating: (From Tom's TV Pilots marathon on March 25th, 2011) |