Poll

Which is best?

The original trilogy
The prequels (new and shiny!)
They are the same
I don't care. Star Wars is rubbish.
Yes, but does Harry Potter die?

Author Topic: Star Wars: original trilogy vs. prequels  (Read 12364 times)

Offline Antares

  • Super Heavy Poster
  • ******
  • Posts: 4161
    • View Profile

Offline Achim

  • Mega Heavy Poster
  • *******
  • Posts: 7179
  • Country: 00
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: original trilogy vs. prequels
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2010, 05:54:31 AM »
Was this posted before...?



It's hilarious and rather insightful. Go to YouTube to find the other 6 parts; 70min but worthwhile. Not sure the originals would give way under such scrutiny or not, but it certainly shows what a piece3 of crap  The Phantom Menace is; if you needed proof...

I watched his review of Avatar yesterday and it was quite good too

Offline Achim

  • Mega Heavy Poster
  • *******
  • Posts: 7179
  • Country: 00
    • View Profile
Re: Star Wars: original trilogy vs. prequels
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2010, 06:36:01 AM »
RedLettermedia released the review for Attack of the Clones:



If you liked the first one, this is more of the same. George Lucas is (again) revealed to be a useless hack of a writer/director...

SailorRipley

  • Guest
Re: Star Wars: original trilogy vs. prequels
« Reply #18 on: July 28, 2010, 02:59:12 AM »
Ah, I watched this the other day and thought it was a riot. Bravo.

I just never got into the whole captivity/torture angle of the video.