Recent Topics

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
December 07, 2016, 03:30:16 PM

Login with username, password and session length

  • Total Posts: 109574
  • Total Topics: 4361
  • Online Today: 20
  • Online Ever: 163
  • (March 25, 2008, 12:28:17 AM)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 11
Total: 11

Member's Reviews

Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance, a review by Dragonfire

Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance

I decided to see this movie while it was still in the theater here.  I tend to like movies based on comic book characters, sometimes even ones that other people don't like, including Ghost Rider.  I could tell by the trailers that this one was going to be different, but I didn't realize how different. 

I ended up seeing this in 3D because of the start times.  The non 3D was only playing once a day, at about 10:00 pm, and that just wasn't possible when I was working.  The 3D is completely pointless and it is a waste of time to watch that version.  There are no shots that take advantage of the 3D.

Johnny Blaze is hiding out in Eastern Europe, trying to avoid people and turning into the Rider.  A monk who like to drink, Moreau, finds Johnny and talks him into trying to help protect a young boy named Danny by offering to get rid of the Rider.  Johnny and Moreau then head off to protect Danny from the people after him who just happen to work for the Devil.

The plot, such as it is, is a big stinking mess.  I wasn't expecting a lot from the movie, but it was still disappointing.  The movie really doesn't build on anything from the first movie, and is barely connected to it.  By the end of the first movie, Johnny knew that the Rider was the Devil's bounty hunter and he had figured out how to control him.  Johnny decided to keep the Rider and fight evil.  In this movie, all that is out the window.  Johnny seems to have no control where the Rider is concerned.  He asks what the Rider is, and gets a different explanation.  He also wants the Rider gone.  Some semblance of continuity with the first movie would have been nice, but there is none.  The plot isn't that interesting and everything tied to Danny just doesn't work that well for me. 

The effects are a mess.  Ghost Rider is a flaming skeleton and his motorcycle is covered in flames as well.  There are very few flames in the movie.  Instead, the Rider is mostly spewing black smoke, sometimes so much, that it blocks other things.  That looks horrible.  The Rider doesn't use his chain that much.  He moves so fast at times, it is almost like he can teleport.  During one scene, when the Rider is there to confront the bad guys, he just stands there, sort of swaying and it looks absolutely ridiculous.  I just realized that it looks like how some of the characters in World of Warcraft or Diablo III sort of sway when standing.  The action scenes don't work that well.  The camera work is very jerky and shaky, which is highly annoying.  Some of the scenes look like they are playing too fast and others use the stupid slow motion. 

The characters are a mess.  Johnny really doesn't seem to be the same character from the first movie and Nicolas Cage reaches new levels of haminess that I didn't think were humanly possible.  His hair was weird too, which was distracting.  There is no explanation for how Moreau knew anything about the Rider, including Johnny being the Rider..or being possessed by him..whatever.  Roarke is the devil, and he is supposed to be the one that Johnny sold his soul to originally.   Anthony Head is in the movie very briefly.

I think there was potential for a somewhat decent movie, but this one isn't that great, though I have seen worse movies.  This movie is a giant mess and really not worth seeing...unless you are like me and feel compelled to see all the movies based on comic books you come across.  I just can't help myself, but there is no way I'm buying this one.  I do draw the line somewhere.

I did post a longer review on Epinions if anyone wants to take a look.

Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance

(From Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance on June 11th, 2012)

Member's Reviews

Kal Ho Naa Ho, a review by Tom

Title: Kal Ho Naa Ho
Year: 2003
Director: Nikhil Advani
Rating: FSK-6
Length: 187 Min.
Video: Anamorphic Widescreen 2.35
Audio: German: Dolby Digital Stereo, Hindi: Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: German

Jaya Bachchan
Shah Rukh Khan
Saif Ali Khan
Preity Zinta
Sushma Seth

Aman Mathur (Shahrukh Khan) is a breath of fresh air when he moves into unhappy Naina's (Priety Zinta) tiny Indian neighborhood in Manhattan, conspiring with friend Rohit (Saif Ali Khan) to help her find happiness. This tear-jerking romantic comedy-drama is the story of their journey together: how they discover themselves, find the courage to love and to celebrate life.

Filmfare Awards2004NominatedBest Actor AwardShahrukh Khan
Filmfare Awards2004WonBest Actress AwardPreity Zinta
Filmfare Awards2004NominatedBest Director AwardNikhil Advani
Filmfare Awards2004WonBest Lyricist AwardJaved Akhtar
Filmfare Awards2004NominatedBest Movie Award
Filmfare Awards2004WonBest Music Director AwardShankar-Ehsaan-Loy
Filmfare Awards2004NominatedBest Supporting Actor AwardShahrukh Khan
Filmfare Awards2004WonBest Supporting Actor AwardSaif Ali Khan
Filmfare Awards2004WonBest Supporting Actress AwardJaya Bachchan
IIFA Awards2004WonBest ActressPreity Zinta
IIFA Awards2004WonBest LyricistJaved Akhtar
IIFA Awards2004WonBest Male PlaybackSonu Nigam
IIFA Awards2004WonBest Movie
IIFA Awards2004WonBest Music DirectorShankar-Ehsaan-Loy
IIFA Awards2004WonBest Supporting ActorSaif Ali Khan
IIFA Awards2004WonBest Supporting ActressJaya Bachchan

Scene Access
Music Videos

My Thoughts:
Even more of a tearjerker than Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham. I enjoyed this movie. Shah Rukh Khan was good again, and Preity Zinta was a joy. The next Bollywood movie I will watch will again have those two in the starring role.
This movie is about a guy, who falls in love with Preity Zinta. After overcoming her dislike of him, she also falls in love with him. The problem is, that he has not long left to live, so he tells her that he is married and plays matchmaker between her and a good friend of hers.


(From Tom's Random Reviews on July 9th, 2009)

Member's TV Reviews

My PILOT Marathon, a review by Rich


First Aired: Sunday January 10, 1999 
Tony Soprano, a Capo in the Jersey mafia, begins seeing a therapist because he is stricken by panic attacks. During his session, Dr. Melfi learns of his two conflicted families. Tony is stressed by his unhappy wife, rebellious kids and his demanding mother. On the business side, Tony feels pressure from his willful nephew, while also engaging in a power struggle with his Uncle Junior.

I knew a bit about the series having watched later episodes and reading about the programme to know that I would like it.
Having now watched the pilot it is really up my street.  :yu:
As a pilot it isn't the greatest, but it does an excellent job of mapping out the storyline, characters and direction of the series. I love the duplicity of the main character Tony Soprano - his Mafia work side and as father and husband to his family. For future watching I truly hope they pursue more the adventure action and comedy of his mafia side as opposed to the complications of his family, which would become tiresome in time having to watch.

(From My PILOT Marathon on May 27th, 2008)