DVD Collectors Online

February 09, 2012, 04:05:33 AM

 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Reviews List: # A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y&Z
Support this Site, Order on: Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Sakapo
   Home   Forum Help Search Calendar Login Register  

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The Jason Statham thread  (Read 405 times)
lovemunkey187
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 223
Offline Offline

Posts: 1415


Dead girls don't say no.


View Profile WWW
« on: August 24, 2010, 03:08:41 PM »

There was a little discussion started in the "Whatchya got?" thread, where Jon said something that I agree with and have said many a time. That Crank is a really bad film.

The premise for Crank is quite original and inventive(someone is now going to come up with where this has been done before). If you enjoy action fims the idea that a world class hitman has been drugged and had his heart removed and replaced with a battery powered one and has got to keep spiking his adrenaline levels to keep it from stopping opens up a whole spectrum of possibilities.

Which it fails to deliver. I'm fairly sure that a 12 year old was behind the script, as some of the ideas were things that I would've thought would make excellent cinema when I was 12.  Although I would've included Burt Reynolds.

Shoot 'em Up gives you over the top action and violence with some black humour and a modicum of plot. It also has Monica ( Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling !) Bellucci  in it.



That's very true about his accent. It annoyed me when the character could so easily have been given a British SAS background rather than US.

Crank hitting the action immediately is its appeal for definite, but it also reduces it to a gimmick. I prefer that little detail called "narrative"! Laugh Transporter could do with taking a breather occasionally and director Leterrier ruined Incredible Hulk for being too interested in blowing stuff up all the damn time, but Crank... nah. Good for one off and then it's time to watch films for grown-ups again. Tease
:p Pete, I just watched all three Transporter films... and I was kind of impressed but then...They aren't as good as Crank but... id recommend them I personally i think I like the second one most.

Now that is definitely subjective! Wink I've seen Transporter 1 and 2 and really enjoyed them for what they are. Old fashioned action movies, can't go wrong. Crank? That's something quite different. It's ridiculous to an insane level and actually a very bad film that bludgeons you before you notice how bad it really is! I liked it, but not as a film. Transporter isn't great, but it's far more reliable.



...Jon, I like Crank in a way that its so absolutely ridiculous its awesome... I mean! the action starts instantly! whats not to like! its brainless you can just watch it and not have to think. Have you seen Transporter 3?....  I think my problem with the first Transporter is... Jason Stathem is putting on a funny accent .... and I like his British one!
That's very true about his accent. It annoyed me when the character could so easily have been given a British SAS background rather than US.

Crank hitting the action immediately is its appeal for definite, but it also reduces it to a gimmick. I prefer that little detail called "narrative"! Laugh Transporter could do with taking a breather occasionally and director Leterrier ruined Incredible Hulk for being too interested in blowing stuff up all the damn time, but Crank... nah. Good for one off and then it's time to watch films for grown-ups again. Tease
I'm not 100% but, I don't think that it specifies with which nation he served in the special forces

Just to make Emma happy

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Logged

You cannot slander human nature, its worse than words can paint.

My overdraft
Home of the friendliest till munkeys in the known universe
etailers
[/ur]
goodguy
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 236
Offline Offline

Posts: 1362


Colleen West never liked the first light of day.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2010, 05:19:50 PM »

Shoot 'em Up gives you over the top action and violence with some black humour and a modicum of plot. It also has Monica ( Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling !) Bellucci  in it.[/color]

Shoot 'em Up is a great example on how to get over the top action and violence right. The plot is really nothing more then window dressing and that's a good thing. The casting is pitch perfect with Owen, Bellucci and Giamatti. I haven't seen Crank, but Transporter would be my example on how to try the same and get it all wrong. Narrative my ass.
Logged

Matthias
Jon
Mega Heavy Poster
*******

Score: 582
Offline Offline

Posts: 7865



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2010, 05:34:39 PM »

 Laugh

Matthias, I should say at this point that I didn't mean to suggest Transporter was a good example of "narrative", just that it has one. Wink I like it, but it's just watchable fun, so please don't think I want to imbue with anything more than that.

I haven't seen Shoot 'Em Up yet. Can't think what has been putting me off.  Shrug

I'm not 100% but, I don't think that it specifies with which nation he served in the special forces

I can't remember now, but I think it's simply a picture on his desk or a shelf in his house near the start. There was something that specified he was American.
Logged

Jon
"NOBODY MOVE! I dropped me brain."
Catch up with reviews and news at my blog,
Emma
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 233
Offline Offline

Posts: 2004


Kill him Mr B. KILL HIM!


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2010, 06:04:45 PM »

 Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling ! Drooling !

...Wow, I like that pic. LOL

so...

I think you guys are looking at Crank wrong.

both Crank 1 and 2 and the Gamer (which Neveldine/Taylor also directed) to me are films that are not supposed to be the best films ever they are supposed to be in the same vein as 80's action movies like Demolition man and stuff like that... you know?... dont over analyse them they dont need it...  Wink

And I honestly cant think of anything else to say because that picture really does have me that distracted.  Embarrassed



Logged

Jon
Mega Heavy Poster
*******

Score: 582
Offline Offline

Posts: 7865



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2010, 06:10:54 PM »

Good grief, what are you on?  Laugh Demolition Man is far better than Crank. I love those kind of "everything got all blowed up" movies anyway. Crank wishes it could as much fun. We're not analysing it at all, there's nothing there worth looking at too hard!

And hey, I did actually like Crank. I get what they were trying to do. It's just a shame someone with talent didn't have a crack at it.  Whistle
Logged

Jon
"NOBODY MOVE! I dropped me brain."
Catch up with reviews and news at my blog,
Silence_of_Lambs
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 114
Offline Offline

Posts: 1446


Strength Through Unity - Unity Through Faith


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2010, 11:20:31 PM »

The way I understood the "concept" of Crank it was to shoot an action film that is reduced to the absolute minimum.

The result was an extremely fast action movie without any unnecessary extras (f*** it, who needs a plot if it only distracts from the next carcrash).
You may like it or not, but saying that it lacks a "narrative element" is as funny as stating that Alien has a total absence of little fluffy animals. It's not there because it wasn't intended to be there.

The only really negative thing that can be said about "Crank" is, that they turned it into a sequel and therefore revived "Chev Chelios". But with the success of part I that was to be expected.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2010, 11:24:49 PM by Silence_of_Lambs » Logged

Michael

There's no place like 127.0.0.1
goodguy
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 236
Offline Offline

Posts: 1362


Colleen West never liked the first light of day.


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2010, 11:36:45 PM »

I haven't seen Shoot 'Em Up yet. Can't think what has been putting me off.  Shrug

I know I mentioned it a few times. Maybe it was my frequent recommendation that made you suspicious.   Hmmmm !
Logged

Matthias
lovemunkey187
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 223
Offline Offline

Posts: 1415


Dead girls don't say no.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2010, 12:30:54 PM »

I haven't seen Shoot 'Em Up yet. Can't think what has been putting me off.  Shrug

I know I mentioned it a few times. Maybe it was my frequent recommendation that made you suspicious.   Hmmmm !

How can I say this nicely?  Hmmmm !

Ahh, that's it. Jon pull your thumb out yer butt and get it watched.
Logged

You cannot slander human nature, its worse than words can paint.

My overdraft
Home of the friendliest till munkeys in the known universe
etailers
[/ur]
Achim
Mega Heavy Poster
*******

Score: 346
Offline Offline

Posts: 5862



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2010, 02:11:36 PM »

I am not sure why, but I liked Crank for what it was, except one scene which had me rolling my eyes so hard, it hurt (which is the scene where is having sex with his girlfirend on a trash can Roll Eyes); just rubbed me in a wrong way.

Funny enough, something similar happened with Shoot 'Em Up, although less strongly. I just felt irritated by Belucci's profession
Spoiler (hover to show)
as it seemed they just wanted to make controversial for the sake of it.
Logged


Spoiler: PlayStation Trophy Card (hover to show)
Jon
Mega Heavy Poster
*******

Score: 582
Offline Offline

Posts: 7865



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2010, 04:52:00 PM »

I haven't seen Shoot 'Em Up yet. Can't think what has been putting me off.  Shrug

I know I mentioned it a few times. Maybe it was my frequent recommendation that made you suspicious.   Hmmmm !

How can I say this nicely?  Hmmmm !

Ahh, that's it. Jon pull your thumb out yer butt and get it watched.


 Laugh I just found the Blu on PlayTrade for less than a fiver, so it's worth a crack... Wink
Logged

Jon
"NOBODY MOVE! I dropped me brain."
Catch up with reviews and news at my blog,
lovemunkey187
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 223
Offline Offline

Posts: 1415


Dead girls don't say no.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2010, 06:21:14 PM »

I am not sure why, but I liked Crank for what it was, except one scene which had me rolling my eyes so hard, it hurt (which is the scene where is having sex with his girlfirend on a trash can Roll Eyes); just rubbed me in a wrong way.

Funny enough, something similar happened with Shoot 'Em Up, although less strongly. I just felt irritated by Belucci's profession
Spoiler (hover to show)
as it seemed they just wanted to make controversial for the sake of it.

I don't think that they did specifically do it to be controversial, instead just used a very fetishistic/specialised aspect of that profession. At least it wasn't for gratuitous purposes, it did serve to further the narrative (as Jon would say)
Logged

You cannot slander human nature, its worse than words can paint.

My overdraft
Home of the friendliest till munkeys in the known universe
etailers
[/ur]
Mark Harrison
Heavy Poster
*****

Score: 295
Offline Offline

Posts: 532



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2010, 07:05:51 PM »

I really like Jason Statham.  But I don't care for his choice of movies.  I think Crank is one of the worst blind buys I've ever made.  Saw Transporter and hated it so much I never even bothered with the rest.  And I do like action movies.  I think Demolition Man is a fantastic cheesy action film and can't believe it would be compared to Crank.

I just wish Mr. Statham would start choosing better roles.  I loved him in the Guy Richie films (Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels and Snatch).  So I'd like to see him do something with a little more meat.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Akmif by Fakdordes
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
TinyPortal © 2005-2011