Post by: richierich on January 01, 2009, 04:56:15 PM
Dead Set
(http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/2820/114324mediumat2.jpg)
BIG BROTHER gets a NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD makeover in horror spin-off DEAD SET. The action takes place during a fictional series of the reality TV show, with stories unfolding both on camera in the 'house' and with the staff behind the scenes. When a zombie outbreak occurs the contestants are blissfully unaware inside their secure little bubble, a bubble which soon becomes a fortress when outsiders seek refuge from the walking undead. Inevitably, the infection spreads into the 'house', turning the popularity contest into a scene of carnage, with cast and crew uniting to escape the ultimate 'eviction'.
Jaime Winstone (KIDULTHOOD) stars as production-runner in peril Kelly, with Andy Nyman (SEVERENCE) as hotheaded producer Patrick, Kevin Eldon (HYPERDRIVE) as a disgruntled housemate, and even a surprise appearance from Davina herself. The innovative show is the creation of writer and cult television satirist Charlie Brooker (SCREENWIPE, NATHAN BARLEY) so be prepared for some dark humour, as pop-culture turns zombie and feeds on its own kind.
Our new year eves viewing, really unusual for us as we are not great fans of gore/horror. However to watch the series in one viewing was perfect, and it was an enjoyable experience with plenty of booze and quite a few classic comedy moments.
Overdone zombie/survival theme, but with the twist of a modern everyday scenario. The cast play their parts well of typical braindead big brother contestants, and Andy Nyman as the OTT producer is brilliant and very entertaining. Davina as a bloodlusting zombie is an improvement to her everyday performances :P and it was satisfying watching her get impaled.
The effects are obviously not up to the standard of a multi-million dollar film and there are very few 'scary' moments, but the action is swift, the gore is pretty uncomfortable at times to watch, and all in all I think someone more interested in this genre will really enjoy
:D
Post by: Najemikon on January 01, 2009, 06:21:13 PM
The effects are obviously not up to the standard of a multi-million dollar film and there are very few 'scary' moments, but the action is swift, the gore is pretty uncomfortable at times to watch, and all in all I think someone more interested in this genre will really enjoy
:D
Jimmy seems to have temporarily mislaid my Dead Set review (it was part of the Horror Marathon) :tease:, but whereas we come to the same conclusion, I have disagree about the effects. I think they are up to standard and actually better in some respects. I Am Legend would have been more pricey, but they were shit.
Post by: Jimmy on January 01, 2009, 06:47:02 PM
Jimmy seems to have temporarily mislaid my Dead Set review (it was part of the Horror Marathon) :tease:This is a tv review I only place movie in my part of the review archive ;)
I think that Karsten is the one who update the tv archive...
Post by: Najemikon on January 01, 2009, 07:04:56 PM
Post by: addicted2dvd on January 01, 2009, 08:59:12 PM
Post by: DJ Doena on January 01, 2009, 09:16:57 PM
I think that Karsten is the one who update the tv archive...Actually I have to confess that I only listed entire topics marathon-ing one or more series, not single postings in several threads. :-\
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2009, 05:10:19 PM
(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/6607/106777mediumli4.jpg)
The incredible true story of how an orphaned Jamaican baby, adopted by an elderly white couple and brought up in an all white area of London, became one of the most feared and respected men in Britain. CASS grew up in a time before political correctness and was forced to endure racist bullying on a daily basis, until one day when the years of pent up anger came out in a violent burst. CASS found through violence the respect he never had and became addicted to the buzz of fighting. His way of life finally caught up with him when an attempted assassination on his life, saw him shot three times at point blank range. His inner strength somehow managed to keep him alive but he was left with a dilemma; whether to seek vengeance as the street had taught him, or renounce his violent past. This is the extraordinary story of his life.
For someone who grew up going to football in the late 70's and early 80's, albeit to a lower division club which did not have many incidences of hooliganism, I had read the book and hoped the film would be as mature and enlightening. Unfortunately this is a poorly put together effort, strayed considerably from the autobiography, and was badly acted from most lead characters.
It is more realistic that Green Street, but does not have the same bite and feel of Quadrophenia, I cannot see it being of any interest to anyone who did not live through the era, and I could only keep thinking it was a wasted opportunity of translating a good story to film.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2009, 05:18:09 PM
(http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8489/51ivee9lt2lsl500aa240wx5.jpg)
Clock in to The Office, for even more inappropriate remarks, uncomfortable silences, and petty behavior in the complete fourth season of the Primetime Emmy® Award winning series! Steve Carell (40 Year-Old-Virgin) is back in his Golden Globe® -winning role as Michael Scott, the clueless boss of the Scranton Branch - Dunder Mifflin who 'manages' to create unending comical drama despite his best intentions. Trusty and loyal assistant-to-the-regional manager Dwight Schrute (Rainn Wilson) continues to uphold the office honor as Jim (John Krasinski) and Pam (Jenna Fischer) find ways to sabotage him and encourage Michael's hysterics. Plus, see wonder kid Ryan (B.J. Novak) in his new role at corporate as he pushes the 'infinite' limits of Dunder Mifflin, often pushing Michael to his limits as well. This 4-disc collection contains all 14 hilarious season four episodes and tons of smack talkin' bonus features! You'll want to stay late at The Office to relive every entertaining episode of this must-see, must-own TV show that demands to be watched again and again.
I have been a great fan of the US version of the Office, for the first 2 seasons especially I thought it worked even better than the UK originals. However this 4th series was generally hard work, the scenarios became overly far-fetched and squirmingly embarrassing, and on the whole the format is becoming rather tired. There are of course some great moments and hilarious parts to the series, the dvds have excellent and full extras, but this will probably be the last series I buy.
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2009, 05:29:46 PM
(http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/6001/106689mediumbi4.jpg)
From J.J. Abrams, the director of Cloverfield, comes the long awaited Series 4 of Lost! Join Jack, Sawyer, Kate and the rest of the remaining survivors in an action packed fourth series! Rescue is imminent.... but how or by whom remains a mystery.
Season 4 of Lost and I was wishing for something original this time after a fairly lacklustre S3, and I got it! Unfortunately this is the type of new that makes Lost feel at times it's dragging it's feet - many new characters and a completely new direction of plot. This has made its reputation by releasing small plot details at a time, hand-feeding the watcher pieces of vital story twists & turns just before ending the episode, or even worse the season, thus 'forcing' you to watch more! S4 is the same, but it still infuriantingly works.
As with most Lost fans, I can't wait for the 'end' of the story, hopefully it will be worth the many hours viewing!
;D
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2009, 05:43:17 PM
(http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/1538/51w1t8y2blsl500aa240pq5.jpg)
Turk and Rooster, two aging NYPD detectives who have been longtime partners are faced with a serial killer who is murdering sociopathic criminals. They both have personal issues, and when they start working with a younger team, Perez and Riley, tensions between the pairs of partners is inevitable, especially since Turk is now living with Perez's ex-girlfriend, also a homicide detective.
All the ingredients of a great film? - DeNiro & Pacino playing a couple of veteran cops in a NY thriller, can't go wrong can it? Unfortunately it can, and it did.
Very weak script, two very tired performances from great actors, a plot twist telegraphed so early on in the film it wasn't even worth guessing at, and a storyline too overly cooked for the worst 70's cop shows.
This is not the worst movie ever, but with 2 heavyweights appearing to just be there for their paychecks, it was a major disappointment.
:-\
Post by: Jimmy on January 06, 2009, 05:49:58 PM
The Office - Season 4This is a serie that I think of trying soon, mostly because of Jenna Fischer that I have really appreciated in Lollilove that I've reviewed last year. The first season isn't really costly so I will probably get it in a couple of months.
(http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8489/51ivee9lt2lsl500aa240wx5.jpg)
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2009, 06:02:01 PM
The Office - Season 4This is a serie that I think of trying soon, mostly because of Jenna Fischer that I have really appreciated in Lollilove that I've reviewed last year. The first season isn't really costly so I will probably get it in a couple of months.
(http://img82.imageshack.us/img82/8489/51ivee9lt2lsl500aa240wx5.jpg)
The first 2 seasons are class Jimmy, I highly recommend them, but percevere through the first few episodes S1, I remember it took me a while to get hooked
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2009, 06:12:31 PM
(http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/5565/99266mediumow1.jpg)
Veteran-turned-mercenary Thoorop (Diesel) takes the high-risk job of escorting a woman from Russia to America in a post-apocalyptic world. But it isn't long before they are pursued by warring factions who are both determined to take the girl, and it is up to Thoorop to stop them.
Ignore the trailer for this film, it will give the impression this is worth spending your hard earned dosh on, it isn't. A woeful effort which is reminiscent of the superior Children of Men, the effects and action don't get going till the last half an hour, and these are so choppy it is difficult to understand what is actually happening.
The acting is poor, the action pedestrian and badly filmed, direction amateur and characters unbelievable. An awful ending where it is jumped several years in advance without explanation or what happened in-between culminates this waste of viewing time.
:yawn:
Post by: Dragonfire on January 07, 2009, 03:54:46 AM
Righteous Kill
(http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/1538/51w1t8y2blsl500aa240pq5.jpg)
Turk and Rooster, two aging NYPD detectives who have been longtime partners are faced with a serial killer who is murdering sociopathic criminals. They both have personal issues, and when they start working with a younger team, Perez and Riley, tensions between the pairs of partners is inevitable, especially since Turk is now living with Perez's ex-girlfriend, also a homicide detective.
All the ingredients of a great film? - DeNiro & Pacino playing a couple of veteran cops in a NY thriller, can't go wrong can it? Unfortunately it can, and it did.
Very weak script, two very tired performances from great actors, a plot twist telegraphed so early on in the film it wasn't even worth guessing at, and a storyline too overly cooked for the worst 70's cop shows.
This is not the worst movie ever, but with 2 heavyweights appearing to just be there for their paychecks, it was a major disappointment.
:-\
I actually went to see this one in the theater. I was very disappointed in it as well.. especially how the supposed twist was so clear to me after only a few minutes.
Post by: Achim on January 07, 2009, 05:26:25 AM
This is a serie that I think of trying soon, mostly because of Jenna Fischer that I have really appreciated in Lollilove that I've reviewed last year. The first season isn't really costly so I will probably get it in a couple of months.I also enjoyed the first season very much and recommend it as well.
I just thought I made sure you know that it's not costly because it's only six episodes! If you've seen the much cringe-worthier british original than it's almost fun to compare the two in their similarites and deviations.
Post by: richierich on January 07, 2009, 12:34:10 PM
(http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/6408/104678mediummr0.jpg)
Meet Juno MacGuff (Ellen Page) - a confidently frank teenage girl who calls the shots with a nonchalant cool and an effortless attitude as she journeys through an emotional nine-month adventure into adulthood. Quick witted and distinctively unique, Juno walks Dancing Elk High''s halls to her own tune - preferably anything by The Stooges - but underneath her tough no nonsense exterior is just a teenage girl trying to figure it all out. While most girls at Dancing Elk are updating their MySpace page or shopping at the mall, Juno is a whip-smart Minnesota teen living by her own rules. A typically boring afternoon becomes anything but when Juno decides to have sex with the charmingly unassuming Bleeker (Michael Cera). Faced with an unplanned pregnancy, she and best friend Leah (Olivia Thirlby) hatch a plan to find Juno''s unborn baby the perfect set of parents courtesy of the local Penny Saver. They set their sights on Mark and Vanessa Loring (Jason Bateman and Jennifer Garner), an affluent suburban couple who are longing to adopt their first child. Luckily, Juno has the support of her dad and stepmother (J.K. Simmons and Allison Janney). After the initial shock that their daughter has been sexually active with the unlikely "virile" Bleeker, the family bands together to help Juno. Dad Mac accompanies Juno to size up the prospective adoptive parents to make sure they are not a couple of "wing nuts" while stepmother Bren provides emotional support as Juno fights the prejudices of underage pregnancy. While fall becomes winter and winter turns to spring, Juno moves closer and closer to her due date. Juno''s physical changes mirror her personal growth while the veneer of Mark and Vanessa''s idyllic life starts to show signs of cracking. With a fearless intellect far removed from the usual teen angst, Juno conquers her problems head-on, displaying a youthful exuberance both smart and unexpected.
Quirky flick showing it's Indie roots, at times a little too strongly for my personal taste with sharp dialogue and hip unknown music. But it's offbeat humour and absolutely brilliant acting win-out to produce a memorable film portraying a teenage pregnancy and potentially difficult surrogate mother subject with a lighter look. Ellen Page is great, special mention for JK Simmons who impresses. Not quite a chick-flick, but close! :D
Post by: richierich on January 07, 2009, 12:43:04 PM
(http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9329/65952mediumqf8.jpg)
George Clooney's Oscar-nominated docudrama pits TV newsman Edward R. Murrow (David Strathairn) against Sen. Joseph McCarthy and his single-minded crusade to quell the red threat at home. Despite corporate pressure to back off, Murrow and his CBS staff are determined to examine the lies and fear tactics perpetrated by McCarthy during his Communist witch-hunts. The impressive cast includes Robert Downey Jr., Patricia Clarkson and Jeff Daniels.
I came to this film totally blind regarding Ed Murrow, and generally uninformed about the whole McCarthy witchhunt period of US history. I come away from the film knowing more, but wondering if there are better and more dramatic stories out there from this period that could be told?
A good looking film, you get an excellent period feel with the B&W portrayal, convincing wardrobes and props etc. The direction was good, and the film was easy to watch with time flying by.
Perhaps of much greater interest to a viewer who lived through these times, it is still a good purchase and I am pleased to have watched it.
;D
Post by: Najemikon on January 07, 2009, 01:44:50 PM
I'm sure I remember from elsewhere that Spartacus was one of the first films to finally break the blacklist as Douglas insisted on only using those whose careers had stalled because they were suspected members of the communist party.
Post by: richierich on January 08, 2009, 10:41:54 AM
(http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/853/56976mediumqs3.jpg)
Acclaimed director Atom Egoyan adapts Rupert Holmes's novel about a celebrity journalist who attempts to reveal some old Hollywood skeletons.
Average fare and probably a film that will be remade in 20 years time. The storyline is OK but for some reason the characters aren't convincing and the 'mystery' is fairly transparent, or so I thought, from early in the movie. Lack of depth or atmosphere and the 2 leads just don't quite work, although it is interesting to see Firth playing a more nasty role.
As a bargain bin purchase this is ok, but don't bust your nuts to get it.
:-\
Post by: Dragonfire on January 09, 2009, 12:52:39 AM
Where the truth lies
(http://img360.imageshack.us/img360/853/56976mediumqs3.jpg)
Acclaimed director Atom Egoyan adapts Rupert Holmes's novel about a celebrity journalist who attempts to reveal some old Hollywood skeletons.
Average fare and probably a film that will be remade in 20 years time. The storyline is OK but for some reason the characters aren't convincing and the 'mystery' is fairly transparent, or so I thought, from early in the movie. Lack of depth or atmosphere and the 2 leads just don't quite work, although it is interesting to see Firth playing a more nasty role.
As a bargain bin purchase this is ok, but don't bust your nuts to get it.
:-\
I saw this..rented it a few years ago. It had a different cover them. Anyway, I didn't care for it at all. It just wasn't interesting for me and I didn't care how everything worked out.
Post by: richierich on January 10, 2009, 07:03:42 PM
(http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/354/67120mediumvo8.jpg)
For anyone who's ever been picked on, put down or pushed around, your heroes are here! Rob Schneider, david Spade and Jon Heder star as three older guys who know what it's like to be bullied. After catching some nasty neighbourhood kids picking on a friend's son they strike back by forming a three-man baseball team to challenge the state's best Little Leaguers. Now, cheered on by every nerd, geek and misfit inn town, these underdogs are about to have a field day in this slapstick hit comedy.
Film choice dictated by the company I was in, as normally I wouldn't have viewed this. However I must admit there were quite a good few laughs to be had, farting beef stew into anothers face and projectile vomit jokes are always better when viewing with a crowd and some alcohol intake :laugh:
it won't test your brain cells or be a pleasure from a cinematography or storyline basis, but just for a few adolescent guffaws it is good value :D
Post by: richierich on January 10, 2009, 07:11:40 PM
(http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/2797/7873mediumhk7.jpg)
Derek Zoolander (Ben Stiller) isn't smart, but he looks "really, really good." An empty-headed yet kindhearted male model, the self-absorbed Derek becomes an unwitting pawn in a international assassination plot masterminded by oddball fashion dictator Jacobim Mugatu (Will Ferrell). Meanwhile, the clueless cover guy must also contend with a new rival, a blonde hipster named Hansel (Owen Wilson). Only adding to his troubles is Matilda Jeffries (Christine Taylor), an inquisitive and sensitive journalist.
Stiller's charming and silly comedy liberally skewers the fashion industry while showcasing the actor-director-screenwriter's quirky humour. He casts his real-life family in the film: wife Christine Taylor, sister Amy Stiller, father Jerry Stiller, and mother Anne Meara. As a director, Stiller invokes entertaining performances from Wilson and Ferrell. He also adds cameos by a multitude of celebrities including David Bowie, Natalie Portman, and Lenny Kravitz.
This is the 2nd time I've tried to enjoy this movie, but I'm afraid it does nothing for me and find it dull. It is childish and stupid, perhaps the only thing that got me through it was star spotting the celebrities. Ben Stiller is totally overated and is fortunate to be acting at a period when there is few genuinely funny competition. The best part of the film was a good soundtrack, which bumps up my marks.
This has received great reviews, perhaps I didn't get it, but I will never understand the attention this movie has had.
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 10, 2009, 07:22:43 PM
(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7382/daytheearthstoppedxi8.jpg)
C. Thomas Howell and Judd Nelson star in this sci-fi thriller that finds the citizens of planet Earth forced to prove their worth or else suffer complete and total annihilation. As hundreds of enormous intergalactic robots appear in major cities throughout the world, the future of our civilization hinges on our ability to convince the invaders that our sole purpose in life isn't to spread suffering and misery while laying waste to the planet that has nurtured our species. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide
This was bought for me at xmas, mistakenly by some kind relative thinking it was the Keanu Reeves film.
It is cringeworthingly awful, dreadful in every sense of the word and can only have been made and released to dupe people into viewing it on the back of the aforementioned epic. It doesn't even have the crass appeal of a B movie, the effects are ridiculous, storyline paltry and acting shocking. Will they ever learn that flashing womens boobs and butts will not save a film this awful, it should have been scrapped before the first line was ever recorded.
The only 'highlight' in such a meagre effort is the appearance of Sinead McCafferty, now she really is hot despite not being able to act for toffee!
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on January 10, 2009, 07:29:38 PM
(http://img254.imageshack.us/img254/577/b000e3l7dw01aa240sclzzzoq7.jpg)
Everyone Has A Secret To Confess.
Christian Slater (True Romance, Interview With A Vampire) stars in this tense psychological thriller about a priest caught in the middle of a dangerous murder case. While making his name as a loyal public relations representative for the Catholic Church, Daniel Clemens (Slater) has lost his true calling. But when a fellow priest is accused of a brutal slaying, Clemens defies church orders and continues investigating the case to prove the priest's innocence. With the aid of local reporter (Molly Parker, Nine Lives, TV's Deadwood) and a church lawyer (Stephen Rea, The Crying Game, The End Of The Affair), Daniel soon discovers the deadly truth which will test his faith to the limit.
With a made for TV feel about this movie, it really does not grab the attention, is short on suspense or mystery, and is the type of fare I would only recommend for a wet Sunday afternoon if you were really bored.
Poor old Slater really has filled his career with some average films, I always thought he warranted better roles.
:-\
Post by: Najemikon on January 10, 2009, 08:16:42 PM
This is the 2nd time I've tried to enjoy this movie, but I'm afraid it does nothing for me and find it dull. It is childish and stupid, perhaps the only thing that got me through it was star spotting the celebrities. Ben Stiller is totally overated and is fortunate to be acting at a period when there is few genuinely funny competition. The best part of the film was a good soundtrack, which bumps up my marks.
This has received great reviews, perhaps I didn't get it, but I will never understand the attention this movie has had.
I've seen it a couple of times and while I'm not particularly offended by it, I can't understand it's huge appeal either. I've even seen some reviews and comments seriously suggesting it as one of the best comedies of recent years.
Rubbish. I find its silliness persuasive though and David Duchovny really lifts it for me, obviously taking the piss out of his X-Files persona and does it very well. I think you're being too harsh on Stiller though! A bit hit and miss, maybe, but I enjoy a lot of his stuff. The overrated one you're looking for is Adam Sandler... :D
Post by: Tom on January 10, 2009, 08:22:32 PM
The overrated one you're looking for is Adam Sandler... :DJust when I was about to post a review of an Adam Sandler movie ;) . He may not be a great actor, but I enjoy some of his movies.
Post by: DJ Doena on January 10, 2009, 08:38:02 PM
Post by: richierich on January 13, 2009, 10:54:21 AM
(http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/813/94512mediumbz0.jpg)
Three American brothers who have not spoken to each other in a year set off on a train voyage across India with a plan to find themselves and bond with each other -- to become brothers again like they used to be. Their "spiritual quest", however, veers rapidly off-course (due to events involving over-the-counter pain killers, Indian cough syrup, and pepper spray), and they eventually find themselves stranded alone in the middle of the desert with eleven suitcases, a printer, and a laminating machine. At this moment, a new, unplanned journey suddenly begins.
What started as an original, quirky and interesting movie with plenty of promise sadly tailed off into a twee, dull and self-absorbed trial. It drags on slower than the train from the title, and you find your hand twitching over the fast forward button.
Visually it is a treat, very colourful, rich characters, the music excellent, original and fairly earnest. However this cannot compensate for the lack of any punch in a script that does not spark, I can imagine this is a great book, and should probably have stayed as just that.
Sadly, I am sure there will be pretentious fans of this film who will claim I didn't get it, but when I pop a dvd in I want to be entertained, moved or challenged. This film did not take any of these boxes for me.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on January 13, 2009, 10:59:52 AM
(http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/8350/1514mediumvu3.jpg)
This slick adaptation of Elmore Leonard's 1990 novel features John Travolta as Chili Palmer, a Miami loan shark who's been sent to L.A. to collect on a bad debt from trash movie producer Harry Zimm (Gene Hackman), the maker of the stunning flops "Grotesque" and "Slime People." But this is Harry's lucky day, because Chili is also a film buff, and when he's done talking tough he starts pitching Harry a script idea. As everyone knows, the best background for the motion picture industry is the criminal underworld, and Chili is smoothly launched into the life of a producer: romancing a B-movie scream queen, schmoozing superstars, getting reservations in the hottest restaurants in town. However, Chili's not the only mobster wanting to turn producer. It seems that a thug named Bo Catlett (Delroy Lindo), another of Harry's lenders, also wants a piece of the action. Add in a group of angry drug smugglers and there is an abundance of double- and triple-crosses, as well as plenty of wisecracks and Hollywood insider jokes. GET SHORTY crosses the line of life imitating art--and vice versa--many times, including the real Ernest "Chili" Palmer (on whom the character is based) playing a Mafia henchman. Barry Sonnenfeld's entertaining romp is a wild look at the celebrity life in Hollywood, featuring numerous cameos of stars playing themselves.
A great Hollywood satire, a character just made for Travolta, and plenty of laughs along the way.
Nice jigsaw plotline and great ending with Keitel cameo, all in all a good movie.
:D
Post by: Najemikon on January 13, 2009, 11:31:40 AM
What started as an original, quirky and interesting movie with plenty of promise sadly tailed off into a twee, dull and self-absorbed trial. It drags on slower than the train from the title, and you find your hand twitching over the fast forward button.
Visually it is a treat, very colourful, rich characters, the music excellent, original and fairly earnest. However this cannot compensate for the lack of any punch in a script that does not spark, I can imagine this is a great book, and should probably have stayed as just that.
Sadly, I am sure there will be pretentious fans of this film who will claim I didn't get it, but when I pop a dvd in I want to be entertained, moved or challenged. This film did not take any of these boxes for me.
:yawn:
I loved it! :laugh: "you" may find your hand twitching over the FF button, Mister, but I did not. You obviously didn't get it. :tease:
Have you seen Anderson's other films? It isn't a case of not getting them, because they are Marmite films. I absolutely adore The Royal Tenenbaums, but struggled with The Life Aquatic and I can't see why his debut, Bottle Rocket, was so loved. Rushmore is brilliant though. Actually, if you ever have the chance, watch Rushmore. I would never in a million years recommend the others after you disliked Darjeeling so much, but Rushmore is different. A more focused story with plenty more characters make it busier with less time for his surreal moments; they're still there but he tends to cheat by making them plays staged by the main character.
Post by: richierich on January 13, 2009, 05:58:09 PM
(http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/8269/1385mediumhf1.jpg)
PRESUMED INNOCENT, like most of director Alan J. Pakula's films is also a complex character study. Based on a best-selling novel by Scott Turrow, the courtroom murder mystery tells the story of prosecutor Rusty Sabich (Harrison Ford) who is accused of murdering his former mistress, the beautiful and ambitious Carolyn Polhemus (Greta Scacchi). All the physical evidence points to him, and Sabich's "golden child" character is in deep trouble. His marriage, too, is in jeopardy as new twists of events leave his wife Barbara doubting Ford's innocence, and Sabich's boss Raymond Horgan, who is running for reelection, simply wants the killer caught before his campaign suffers. Ford's performance (somewhat against type based on previous roles) is excellent as the beleaguered attorney who seeks an end to his nightmare, calling acerbic defense lawyer and rival (Raul Julia) to his rescue. Cinematographer Gordon Willis (THE GODFATHER) and Pakula, who collaborated previously on KLUTE, have created a film of shadow and darkness in which great performances keep the audience riveted right up to the unnerving ending.
Slightly dated suspense drama, with a satisfying plot twist at the end, albeit the killer was obvious after about half an hour. Ford has been in better films, this movie coming probably at the peak of his career, but a solid supporting cast and good direction aid in the endeavour.
This has all the right elements, but is missing a certain something to make it a truly memorable classic.
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 14, 2009, 11:17:35 AM
(http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/5420/9787mediumxw2.jpg)
When inexperienced call girl Alabama Whitman (Patricia Arquette) is paid to seduce comic-book-nerd and Elvis fanatic Clarence Worley (Christian Slater), she doesn't expect to fall for him. But these two lost souls seem to be made for each other and quickly pledge their love, marrying at Detroit's city hall. Clarence discovers some newfound bravado and attempts to retrieve Alabama's possessions from her pimp, Drexl (Gary Oldman), who isn't exactly eager to let Alabama go. Fleeing Drexl's apartment, Clarence not only leaves a trail of bodies, but also inadvertently mistakes a suitcase of uncut cocaine for one with his wife's clothing, and the chase is on. The unlikely newlyweds head for Los Angeles hoping to sell the cocaine and make enough money to leave the country. Unfortunately, they also have to contend with the mob, yuppie drug dealers and the police. Michael Rapaport is amusing as Clarence's best friend who lives with Floyd, a stoner played by Brad Pitt. A sedate Dennis Hopper appears as Clarence's father, who ultimately faces off with mob boss Vincenzo Coccotti (Christopher Walken). Director Tony Scott (CRIMSON TIDE, ENEMY OF THE STATE) does justice to the violence and quirkiness of Quentin Tarantino's second feature film script.
Tremendous Tarantino romp, edge of my seat from start to finish. Cleverly written, directed and acted, all the cast were on top form - Slater, the lovely Arquette, Walken, Hopper, Gandolfini, even Val Kilmer as elvis and Pitt as the stoned flatmate worked well.
It is brutal in parts, funny in others, twisted but sweet romance, I now understand how this film reaches into peoples top tens.
Shades of Kill Bill with the extreme violence, specifically to Alabama, but this film can only be heralded as an absolute MUST-SEE
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on January 15, 2009, 10:41:01 AM
(http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/3480/132621gb3.jpg)
Goldie Hawn stars in this comedy of political errors as Sunny Davis, a ditsy Washington, D.C., waitress who gets herself involved in the middle of international politics when she inadvertently saves a visiting foreign politician from an assassin's bullet. Sunny becomes an overnight national hero and is used as a political pawn in a Middle Eastern government scam, unaware of the plot against her until it's almost too late.
Boring and empty, I like Goldie Hawn as a person and loved Overboard, but Protocol was like a poor 70's low budget flick. Hollow characters, typecast leads, ridiculous storyline, and sadly very very few titters or amusing moments.
Clearly made to order for Goldie, this is a movie to avoid unless you enjoy watching wood warp
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on January 15, 2009, 10:43:15 AM
(http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/4592/2408mediumox7.jpg)
Six signs of the world's end have come to pass as predicted in the Bible. Now a young woman discovers that she and her unborn child play a terrifying part in the chain of events destined to end the world - she has been selected as the chosen instrument of the seventh sign.....
Lack-lustre fare with little tension or drama, acting is average at best and storyline plods through mud, only Moore comes out of it with some respect. I'd recommend the Omen opposed to this any day.
:-\
Post by: Najemikon on January 15, 2009, 12:28:33 PM
...this is a movie to avoid unless you enjoy watching wood warp
:yawn:
Best line I've heard in ages! :hysterical:
Post by: richierich on January 16, 2009, 12:12:05 AM
(http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7209/1129mediumph9.jpg)
Before Peter Finch was 'mad as hell' in NETWORK, Sidney Lumet's scorching indictment of the American television industry, Al Pacino played an equally ferocious and fed-up bank robber in Lumet's classic film DOG DAY AFTERNOON. Pacino is heartbreakingly real as Sonny, a smart and tough if self-destructive Brooklyn tough whose plan to rob the local bank to fund his male lover's (Chris Sarandon) sex change goes absurdly wrong. Accompanied only by his doltish accomplice, Sal (John Cazale), Sonny resorts to kidnapping a handful of bank employees when he realizes that all the money had been removed before his arrival. As the lengthy August day drags on, Sonny and the hordes of local police, led by Sergeant Moretti (Charles Durning), make little progress, and eventually Sonny's wife and lover are brought to the scene. The crowd's sympathy is immediately captured by the charismatic Sonny, whose antagonism with the police is played out before an audience of millions, leading to an inevitably tragic finish.
Balancing suspense, violence, and humor, the film's depiction of a grand scale media event craftily dives from the political to the personal, evoking a piercing portrait of a single man and his devastating downward tumble into the cracks of the system that Lumet made a career of chronicling. DOG DAY AFTERNOON reunites Pacino with his SERPICO director Lumet, and stands as one of the finest films of the 1970s.
Stand-out performance by Pacino masks the dating of this movie, incredible depth and appeal he creates for the character Sonny highlights his genuine talent. The film as a whole is pretty limp for me in terms of action and suspense, and the 2nd half is totally ruined by being bogged down with over the top sentimentality regarding homosexuality.
Overall an enjoyable viewing experience, and a pleasure to see Pacino mastering his craft
:D
Post by: richierich on January 19, 2009, 10:34:06 AM
(http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/8729/2481mediumpp2.jpg)
The first spaghetti western made in America (sans Leone) and Eastwood's first star vehicle made outside Europe. Eastwood's innocent cowboy miraculously survives his own hanging and then treks across the frontier to bring his hangmen to justice. Highly entertaining, featuring in small parts Dern, Hopper, and cowboy veteran Bob Steele as a dungeon prisoner.
Clumsy mish-mash of a Western, a potentially good film made badly.
Too many close-ups of the wooden Inger Stevens playing Rachel, trembling bottom lip and moody far-away stares, all should have been cut from the movie. The romance didn't work for me in this film, it should have been left as a gritty tale of frontier life.
Possibly the weakest in the Eastwood stable of Westerns for me, it was early in the career and too much 'eyes' and stretched believability - he was shot a dozen times in the parlour, but was up and about soon after - perhaps they had better health care in those days?
As Hollywoods first attempt to copy the gore and brutality of a Spag Western, and a staging post in Clints career, it is probably worth a watch.
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 19, 2009, 10:42:09 AM
(http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/7662/5078mediumlg0.jpg)
Bruce Willis is The Jackal - the greatest assassin in history - out to eliminate a top U.S. government official. Declan Mulqueen, an imprisoned underground operative, is the only man who can stop him. Now, the Deputy Director of the FBI, is taking the biggest risk of all . . . he's releasing one criminal to stop another in this terrifically explosive, totally intrigueing suspense thriller.
First-off, admission this is a guilty pleasure, I know it isn't a patch on the 70's original, I know the formula was well-tested, I know Gere's Irish accent is about as ill fitting and phony as Willis's tash, but I do like it.
It is entertaining, believable, has dated reasonably well, thumping soundtrack, and I thought Willis as the cold hearted assassin works really well.
The suspense is played out well, Poitier is convincing as the FBI agent, and enough twists and turns to keep you watching.
I like it, but can concede why others would be appalled at this remake.
;D
Post by: richierich on January 19, 2009, 10:44:35 AM
(http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/6938/2018mediumrx7.jpg)
Max is a happily married and successful man with two healthy children. However, on a business trip to New York, he meets the beautiful Karen and they embark on a brief affair. On his return home he finds his life different and he begins to withdraw from the people closest to him, even though he and Karen had vowed to forget the relationship. A year later he returns to New York to comfort his hospitalised best-friend and finds himself face-to-face with Karen...
Better than I anticipated, Snipes was the wrong lead for this film, but the other characters were convincing, and Downey in particular gives a strong and moving performance.
A good storyline, basically an inter-racial NY romance, developing into more following the surprise meeting of the couple with their partners at a dying mans hospital bed.
I am not to aware of Mike Figgis' work, but on the back of this will try and source Leaving Las Vegas, which critically was more successful than this movie.
:D
Post by: richierich on January 20, 2009, 10:20:58 AM
(http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6600/1136mediumkn0.jpg)
A federal marshal on an outer-space mining colony uncovers a hideous secret that threatens the sanity of miners working in the depths of an outer planet. Academy Award Nominations: Best Sound.
Academy award for best sound??? How does that work - very mystifying, I didn't find anything remarkable in that category for this movie??
Somewhat predictable 80's sci-fi come cop action movie, it was the 'sheriff comes to town to clean up and upsets the rich crook, who gets the hired hands to take revenge' plot, but in fairness with a novel twist of it happening in space.
Blue Peter sets do not help the overall visual appeal of the movie, and Sean Connery was definately the wrong lead. The doctor would have struggled in a school pantomine, and the 'baddie' just wasn't bad enough. Lots of running around and up and down walkways, a few exploding bodies etc etc.
Having said all this negative critique, the film has some perverse appeal, was very watchable, you do find yourself cheering on the underdog, and bearing in mind it is now nearly 30 years old, it does hold up rather well.
:)
Post by: richierich on January 20, 2009, 10:41:21 AM
(http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6519/27123mediumrt0.jpg)
ONe of the all-time classic Westerns - considered by many to be the movie that propelled John Wayne to stardom in 1939. The film is set against the impressive backdrop of Monument Valley in Utah and tells the story of a mixed group of travellers who are making their way across the country to Arizona. They are endangered by an Indian War Party and this, along with their personal histories, results in difficulties. The film pays particular attention to the character studies of the group and is a taut psychological piece which earned an Oscar for Thomas Mitchell's performance as the drunken doctor. The music also won an Oscar and John Ford and Bert Flennon were nominated for best picture. A true classic American western.
A true cinema classic, still very enjoyable to watch some 70 years later, amazing stunts that at times are jaw-dropping (falling under moving horses and stagecoach etc) a film often copied but IMO not bettered.
The action has not aged and for such an old film is so impressive, and the time spent on building the characters so worthwhile and testament to Fords direction. I am not a great John Wayne fan, but in this he was perfect as The Ringo Kid, but the show stealer for me will always be Thomas Mitchell playing Doc Boone.
This is a must-see for all cinema fans ;D
Post by: richierich on January 21, 2009, 11:10:17 AM
(http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/2626/1289mediumku3.jpg)
When Chicago cop Nico Toscani (Steven Seagal) discovers that suspects apprehended in a drug bust are allowed to walk, he's not happy. Soon Nico himself is asked to turn in his badge. Although he's now off the force, no way is he out of the action. Seagal makes a smashing screen debut in this tale of a good cop who is forced to confront corruption within the department. NICO offers non-stop thrills and features strong supporting performances by Pam Grier and Sharon Stone.
Interesting to see Seagals first major film, a violent all-action blockbuster specifically written with this actor in mind. Lets be honest, his fighting skills are significantly better than his acting prowess!
An 80's feel of course, but the pace is adequate, the script predictable, and easy to watch.
Not ground-breaking, and not good enough to recommend spending any hard earned cash on.
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 25, 2009, 08:28:43 PM
(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/3377/43509mediumyj0.jpg)
A businessman finds he and his friends the prisoners of a sadistic judge and his equally odd family in the backwoods of a bizarre mansion.
With such a superb cast, I approached this film with an expectation of content. What a surprise I had, one of the weirdest most unpredictable comedies I've seen.
Some parts are rather unpleasant (Fat foundry twins), some were hilariously funny (penis nose at the dinner table), and others bizarre (imagine Jon Candy in drag for example). Written by Dan Ackroyd, who stars as the hideous judge, it is supported by the likes of Candy, Demi Moore, Chevy Chase, and in one set Tupac!
It is an incredibly difficult film to judge, although on hindsight it was pretty poor, I was compelled to watch all the way through, even suffering the spontaneous pop video in the courtroom.
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 25, 2009, 08:45:01 PM
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/7118/107879mediumhx1.jpg)
Based on a true story, "The Express" follows the extraordinary life of college football hero Ernie Davis, the first African-American to win the Heisman Trophy. His fight for equality and respect forever changed the face of American sports, and his story continues to inspire new generations. Raised in poverty in Pennsylvania coal-mining country, Davis hurdled social and economic obstacles to become one of the greatest running backs in college football history. Under the guidance of legendary Syracuse coach Ben Schwartzwalder, he became a hero who superseded Jim Brown's achievements and set records that stand to this day. Decorated veteran Schwartzwalder was a Southerner with a single vision of a national championship and hardened ideas about how the world worked. But, though he and Davis clashed mightily, he taught the player everything he knew about football, just as Davis helped him learn the true meaning of victory. As the growing civil rights movement divided the country in the '60s, Davis became a symbol for achievement that transcended race. Refusing to flinch from others' prejudices, he achieved all his goals--until he faced a challenge that would make most men crumble. He joined the ranks of black pioneers by teaching a generation tolerance, inspiring a movement that smashed barriers on and off the field.
These 'uplifting' true sports stories are becoming more and more common, and I sat down for this worrying it may fall into the 80% made which are too gushy and overdone to be pallatable.
Fortunately this film about Ernie Davis was made in a thoughtful, realistic, and straight down the line way, and was pretty enjoyable, albeit despite it's name of Express, it rather crawled along through the story.
Perhaps the time has come now to reduce the making of such films portraying the overcoming of bygone 'black' bigotry by American sportsmen, and discover some new avenues to pursue on the screen. The focus of the film IMO strayed too far on the portrayal of the coach, one assumes due that the star billing Dennis Quaid played this part? I'd have liked to have learnt more about Ernie Davis, who seemed a very interesting character.
In summary I enjoyed the film, it is definately not the best of its genre, but by no means not the worst.
:D
Post by: richierich on January 25, 2009, 08:48:37 PM
(http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/8922/6716mediumxc5.jpg)
Billy Madison, the dim-witted son of a millionaire, wastes his life guzzling beer and devising obscene pranks until his father threatens to leave him nothing. In order to earn his father's respect,... Billy Madison, the dim-witted son of a millionaire, wastes his life guzzling beer and devising obscene pranks until his father threatens to leave him nothing. In order to earn his father's respect, Billy, who bribed his way through school, must pass all 12 grades in six months or see a sycophantic assistant get his father's fortune. Billy struggles with the aide and his own idiocy to make good in this gag-filled farce.
What a pathetic, juvenile load of shit.
Thank god I didn't see this years ago, or I would have been put off Sandler forever :yucky:
Post by: richierich on January 25, 2009, 09:00:34 PM
Title: Chaplin
Runtime:135
Certificate:PG-13
Year:1992
Genres:Drama, Comedy
Plot:Directed by Sir Richard Attenborough and starring Robert Downey, Jr. and an extraordinary cast, CHAPLIN is a loving, grand scale portrait of the Little Tramp's amazing life and times. HIs poverty-stricken childhood in England comes to life along with his friendships with Mack Sennett (Dan Ackroyd) and Douglas Fairbanks (Kevin Kline), his many wives and scandalous affairs, and his relentless pursuit by J. Edgar Hoover. CHAPLIN is the larger-than-life story of the actor behind the icon and a stunning depiction of a bygone era when Hollywood was at its most glamorous.
My Review:
A wonderful biographical film, for the 2nd time in as many weeks I have witnessed Downeys immense talent as an actor, it's a shame he has been in so many bad films. The movie provides a glimpse into a complicated man with 2 very different personas, the joker on the stage, the quiet, introverted and rather sad man off it.
Clearly Chaplin was a womaniser, with a rather unpleasant taste for very young women, perhaps he became too big for his boots, taking too many risks with controversial themes for his movies, but there is no doubting his immense talent, imagination beyond his years and ahead of time, a workaholic dedication to his art, and many of his movies are now deemed classics. He seemed at home with a camera, developing the scores, creating, but away from this I couldn't help but feel sorry for him as a rather pathetic lonely figure.
I hadn't realised Chaplin had been hounded out of the States by Hoover, and the ending with the return of Charlie to receive a special Academy Award brought a lump to my throat.
A great Attenborough film, superbly acted, and highly recommended.
:thumbup:
Post by: Jimmy on January 25, 2009, 09:29:21 PM
What a pathetic, juvenile load of shit.What was you expecting, it's an Adam Sandler's movie :laugh:
Except for The Wedding Singer, I've never find anything worthy of my time in any film he had appear in his "career". But, I'm certain that I like The Wedding Singer more for nostalgic reasons than anything else (even if the film is full of errors).
Post by: DJ Doena on January 25, 2009, 09:35:55 PM
Try "50 First Dates", "Spanglish", "Click". Especially the latter ones are less slapstick and have a more serious side to them.What a pathetic, juvenile load of shit.What was you expecting, it's an Adam Sandler's movie :laugh:
Except for The Wedding Singer, I've never find anything worthy of my time in any film he had appear in his "career". But, I'm certain that I like The Wedding Singer more for nostalgic reasons than anything else (even if the film is full of errors).
Post by: richierich on January 26, 2009, 01:29:01 PM
Try "50 First Dates", "Spanglish", "Click". Especially the latter ones are less slapstick and have a more serious side to them.What a pathetic, juvenile load of shit.What was you expecting, it's an Adam Sandler's movie :laugh:
Except for The Wedding Singer, I've never find anything worthy of my time in any film he had appear in his "career". But, I'm certain that I like The Wedding Singer more for nostalgic reasons than anything else (even if the film is full of errors).
Good point, I have enjoyed Sandlers later roles, and in less slapstick storylines
Post by: richierich on January 26, 2009, 01:32:27 PM
(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/6861/51zmjw51c5lsl500aa240xp5.jpg)
Spies! Playing the game of love – and sudden death! Along with The 39 Steps (1935), The Lady Vanishes is one of Alfred Hitchcock’s most famous British-produced films. During a journey aboard a Trans-Continental Express train from Europe to England, young socialite Iris (Margaret Lockwood) strikes up an acquaintance with a middle-aged English governess, Miss Froy (Dame May Whitty), who, during the journey mysteriously disappears from her compartment. Based on the story The Wheel Spins by Ethel Lina White.
Definately the best Hitchcock UK film (yes, better than 39 steps) before he was put under contract by Selznick, forgetting the obvious technological constraints of the time. It isn't a great film, especially in comparison to his Strangers on a Train or Shadow of a Doubt, but it is a good film. I wouldn't recommend purchasing it unless you are a 'completist' and wanting to own all of Hitchcocks movies. It is perhaps a little 'too british', littered with cricketing terms, cucumber sandwiches, stiff upper lips and jolly old hockeysticks!
The cast is wonderful, some good witty exchanges especially in the first 20 minutes, but the suspense he mastered in later films is just not there in this outing. Trademark camerawork and stylish flourish of the director are clear to see, but you never get the edge of the seat thrill found in his classics.
A good film nonetheless, imagine the period of history the original audience viewed this and you understand how well it originally went down, and one not to ignore if showing on the tv. :D
Post by: richierich on January 27, 2009, 10:40:50 AM
(http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/8627/68601923ce8.png)
Released in 1962, this first James Bond movie remains one of the best and serves as an entertaining reminder that the Bond series began (in keeping with Ian Fleming's novels) with a surprising lack of gadgetry and big-budget fireworks. Sean Connery was just 32 years old when he won the role of Agent 007. In his first adventure James Bond is called to Jamaica where a colleague and secretary have been mysteriously killed. With an American CIA agent (Jack Lord, pre-Hawaii Five-O), they discover that the nefarious Dr. No (Joseph Wiseman) is scheming to blackmail the US government with a device capable of deflecting and destroying US rockets launched from Cape Canaveral. Of course, Bond takes time off from his exploits to enjoy the company of a few gorgeous women, including the bikini-clad Ursula Andress. She gloriously kicks off the long-standing tradition of Bond women who know how to please their favourite secret agent. A sexist anachronism? Maybe, but this is Bond at his purest
A great start, and a perfect formula to what was going to be such a successful run of films. Bond is edgy in Dr No, faithful to the book, and maybe a little less camp than he became. Sean Connery for me will always be 'The Bond' and his introduction to the audience is masterful, remember that sweeping pan around the card table in the casino, and Connery drawling those immortal words "Bond, James Bond"
On the critical side, it is obviously more primitive than later outings, the ending is a bit of an anti-climax, and it is relatively low budget.
However, the lack of gadgetry and explosives works for me, I find Dr No more intimate, gritty, a deeper sense of danger, providing a more gripping thriller laced with heady intrigue. The villains from here became the norm in later outings, megalomaniacs, normally with a deformity, high tech base etc etc.
And Ursula Andress' arrival on the beach mmmm
I hope everyone has seen this film, I remember my kids watching it on video when they were younger and absolutely loving it also. It is a must-see.
;D
Post by: richierich on January 27, 2009, 10:52:19 AM
(http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/9986/1149mediumkc6.jpg)
Starring legendary actors Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci, this two-time Oscar® winner is "ambitious, violent, poetic and lyrical" ('The New York Times') - "a film of extraordinary power and rare distinction" ('The Wall Street Journal'). Nominated for a total of eight Academy Awards, 'Raging Bull' is filmmaking at its hard-hitting, riveting best.
De Niro turns in an extraordinary, Best Actor Oscar®-winning performance as Jake La Motta, a boxer whose psychological and sexual complexities erupt into violence both in and out of the ring. Nominated for Best Supporting Actor and Actress Oscars®, Pesci and Cathy Moriarty are compelling as the brother who falls prey to Jake's mounting paranoia and jealousy and the fifteen-year-old girl who becomes his most prized trophy. "Tough, compelling [and] powerfully made" ('Halliwell's Film Guide'), 'Raging Bull' strikes hard, fast... and straight to the heart.
I cannot undersand how this has been heralded as the best boxing movie of all time, in my opinion the boxing was purely a backdrop to a deeper exploration of one mans psyche. The fights just appeared to be a release for all the obvious pent-up anger, frustration and jealousy that bubbled in La Motta, and ruined his relationships.
The direction is amazing, just simple shots somehow seem more important and penetrating, claustraphobic in the dometic shots, artistic in the ring. De Niro & Pesci give wonderful convincing acting masterclasses. The unflinching production of a fairly unpleasant personality, makes you realise how volatile and dangerous La Motta would have been roaming the streets, you certainly don't warm to him through the film.
I think everyone should watch this film, to perhaps see de Niro at his best, and Scorsese matching him blow for blow.
;D
Post by: richierich on January 28, 2009, 03:14:05 PM
(http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/4349/105586mediumli3.jpg)
In London, a real-estate scam puts millions of pounds up for grabs, attracting some of the city's scrappiest tough guys and its more established underworld types, all of whom are looking to get rich quick. While the city's seasoned criminals vie for the cash, an unexpected player -- a drugged out rock 'n' roller presumed to be dead but very much alive -- has a multi-million dollar prize fall into his hands.
Disappointing Guy Ritchie film after all the hype, and in this genre we have seen it all before, only done significantly better. The script is weak and full of holes, cockney rhyming slang straight from a dictionary (sorry, people don't talk like that), in fact so bad in places it became laughable.
There is no subtlety or intrigue, the plot is shoved down your throat and made me think Ritchie must think his whole audience is dumb. Acting is tame and only Tony Bebbel would come out with any credibility. The violence in the movie is so watered down to achieve a 15 certificate that it loses it's edge, and makes everything seem pointless.
They are making a sequel to this - nice to know that money is now Ritchies sole purpose of directing.
Earwig the dickie bird and save yerself some bread & honey Guv, give this a wide berth!
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 28, 2009, 03:19:04 PM
(http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/2685/3524mediumpj3.jpg)
Robert Mulligan's classic adaptation of Harper Lee's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel, set in the racially charged atmosphere of Macon County, Alabama in the 1930s, TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD is a poignant coming-of-age story. Winner of four Academy Awards including Best Screenplay (written by Horton Foote), and Best Actor (Gregory Peck), TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD is a timeless film packed with beautiful scenes and meaningful life lessons. The story is told from the vantage point of a young girl nicknamed Scout (Mary Badham) whose widowed white father Atticus Finch (Peck), an attorney, decides on principle to defend a black man (Brock Peters) charged with raping a poor white woman. But the bigoted townspeople would rather lynch the accused than try him, and they make life hellish for the lawyer, his daughter, and his son Jem (Philip Alford). While their father is in the throes of the trial, his bright, inquisitive children learn a hard and unforgettable lesson in justice, morality, and prejudice, part of which requires overcoming an unfounded fear of their mysterious neighbour Boo Radley (Robert Duvall).
Twee American classic, for the year it was produced it must have been controversial in some of its delicately handled content, albeit of course set in 30's Alabama.
The book I read back in school many years ago, and I think the adaptation keeps the original authors intent. The black and white production, novel film angles, sympathetic score and intelligent direction are plusses, the only real problem I had with the film was it's overly long length and at times 'finger on fast forward' desire to speed up the pace.
Peck does a credible job as Addicus, but the film is stolen by both children actors, especially the tomboy who played Scout, who narrates the film.
Worth a recommendation :D
Post by: Najemikon on January 28, 2009, 09:26:13 PM
I cannot undersand how this has been heralded as the best boxing movie of all time, in my opinion the boxing was purely a backdrop to a deeper exploration of one mans psyche. The fights just appeared to be a release for all the obvious pent-up anger, frustration and jealousy that bubbled in La Motta, and ruined his relationships.
The direction is amazing, just simple shots somehow seem more important and penetrating, claustraphobic in the dometic shots, artistic in the ring. De Niro & Pesci give wonderful convincing acting masterclasses. The unflinching production of a fairly unpleasant personality, makes you realise how volatile and dangerous La Motta would have been roaming the streets, you certainly don't warm to him through the film.
I think everyone should watch this film, to perhaps see de Niro at his best, and Scorsese matching him blow for blow.
;D
I think you answer your own question there. La Motta was a fascinating character who kind of never stopped boxing. Most boxing films are just fights joined together by forced drama, but here, he never stops punching, in or out of the ring. He was consumed by his own career.
Post by: richierich on January 29, 2009, 10:00:40 AM
I cannot undersand how this has been heralded as the best boxing movie of all time, in my opinion the boxing was purely a backdrop to a deeper exploration of one mans psyche. The fights just appeared to be a release for all the obvious pent-up anger, frustration and jealousy that bubbled in La Motta, and ruined his relationships.
The direction is amazing, just simple shots somehow seem more important and penetrating, claustraphobic in the dometic shots, artistic in the ring. De Niro & Pesci give wonderful convincing acting masterclasses. The unflinching production of a fairly unpleasant personality, makes you realise how volatile and dangerous La Motta would have been roaming the streets, you certainly don't warm to him through the film.
I think everyone should watch this film, to perhaps see de Niro at his best, and Scorsese matching him blow for blow.
;D
I think you answer your own question there. La Motta was a fascinating character who kind of never stopped boxing. Most boxing films are just fights joined together by forced drama, but here, he never stops punching, in or out of the ring. He was consumed by his own career.
Thats true, even towards the end as the fat loser trawling seedy bars trying to do stand-up comedy (I wonder how they made DeNiro look so fat?)
Post by: Najemikon on January 29, 2009, 10:05:24 AM
Thats true, even towards the end as the fat loser trawling seedy bars trying to do stand-up comedy (I wonder how they made DeNiro look so fat?)
I'm pretty sure, he put the weight on. His face obviously has a lot of make-up, mainly for La Motta's fascinating nose! But the belly was all real.
From Wikipedia: "production of the film was then closed down for around four months with the entire crew was being paid, so De Niro could go on a binge eating trip around Northern Italy and France. When he did come back to the United States, his weight increased from 145 to 215 pounds (66 to 97 kg). The scenes with the fatter Jake LaMotta—which include announcing his retirement from boxing and LaMotta ending up in a Florida cell—were completed while approaching Christmas 1979 within seven to eight weeks so as not to aggravate the health issues which were already affecting De Niro's posture, breathing, and talking."
An American goes to Europe to put weight ON? ???
Post by: richierich on January 29, 2009, 10:12:49 AM
(http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/8711/99124mediumjn9.jpg)
An all-star cast, including George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Frances McDormand, Tilda Swinton and John Malkovich, come together in this outrageous spy comedy about murder, blackmail, sex addiction and physical fitness!
When a disc filled with some of the CIA's most irrelevant secrets gets in the hands of two determined, but dim-witted, gym employees, the duo are intent on exploiting their find. But since blackmail is a trade better left for the experts, events soon spiral out of everyone's and anyone's control, resulting in a non-stop series of hilarious encounters! From Joel and Ethan Coen, the Academy Award winning directors of No Country For Old Men and The Big Lebowski, comes this brilliantly clever and endlessly entertaining movie that critics are calling smart, funny, and original.
Quirky film, like Fargo you are engrossed all the way through and chuckling constantly, caught by surprises often, and look at each other afterwards and say 'WTF was that!'
Such a massive web of deceit, betrayal, infidelity and lies, it is hard to see for an hour how this will all fall together. It suffers from a very stodgy start, but after half an hour you daren't look away. The best comparison I can give is that BAF is a mix between Fargo violence and Big Lebowski humour. All of the actors shine, but Frances McDormand steals it for me as an exceptional performance.
This is a smart comedy, and potentially a cult film in the future. Very enjoyable ;D
Post by: Achim on January 29, 2009, 11:26:29 AM
An American goes to Europe to put weight ON? ???While Europe has the better food (I dare say), if you combine it in all the wrong ways you can easily put on the pounds quickly; and probably in a better way than eating loads of greasy burgers. Sure he could have eaten the same foods in the US, but why do it there is you can have a nice trip to europe at the same time :)
Post by: richierich on January 29, 2009, 01:51:04 PM
:redcard: Where's the To Kill a Mocking Bird review?
In production 8)
I started to watch the dvd but had to switch films when my partner arrived and said she didn't want to watch some old crap :bag:
It will be completed this evening :thumbup:
Post by: richierich on January 30, 2009, 10:41:04 AM
(http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/1494/28471mediumud0.jpg)
STRANGERS ON A TRAIN, based on the Patricia Highsmith novel, quickly became one of Alfred Hitchcock's most successful thrillers and remains one of his most popular films. En route from Washington, D.C., champion tennis player Guy Haines (Farley Granger) meets pushy playboy Bruno Anthony (Robert Walker). What begins as a chance encounter turns into a series of morbid confrontations, as Bruno manipulates his way into Guy's life. Bruno is eager to kill his father and knows Guy wants to marry a senator's daughter (Ruth Roman) but cannot get a divorce from his wife, Miriam (Laura Elliot). So Bruno suggests the men swap murders, which would leave no traceable clues or possible motives. Though Guy refuses, it will not be so easy to rid himself of the psychopathic Bruno. The film is tightly paced and disturbing from beginning to end, an effect heightened by Hitchcock's inventive camera work, including a terrifying sequence shot through a pair of eyeglasses that have been knocked to the ground.
Wonderful Hitchcock drama, with an unfamiliar cast who all punch above their weight. Robert Walker in particular is absolutely superb as the disturbed Bruno. Although this was not one of his supposed classics, it is one of my favourites.
Exquisite camerawork, character building by intelligent dialogue, and as in many of his films A1 music accompiniment.
This has lost nothing over the years, and with a script that performs like clockwork you can't go far wrong
;D
Post by: Achim on January 30, 2009, 04:06:17 PM
I started to watch the dvd but had to switch films when my partner arrived and said she didn't want to watch some old crap :bag:Excused! (just wanted to make sure you don't forget)
Post by: richierich on February 01, 2009, 06:25:59 PM
(http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/7165/98098mediumav9.jpg)
Comedian Paul Merton ventures into the unknown as he embarks upon a six week tour of China. Paul¿s trip will take in the major cities of China, as well as the most breathtaking countryside and remote backwaters that this vast country as to offer.
4 part series originally shown on Channel 5, of interest to those who enjoy travelogues such as Palins adventures. Clearly by choosing comedian Merton as the presenter the producers had hoped to make this slightly more entertaining than other similar shows. However with what was clearly a punishing schedule, and Merton having 'stomach' trouble after tasting local cuisine such as donkey cock and sheeps testicles, he came across a lot of the time as grouchy and an ungrateful tourist.
There was also some restrictions on his access in China, and it was clear that he was minded by several government officials during his trip. I found his dry humour, which works well on his various TV appearances, just fell flat at times and was disappointed he was very unadventurous in various scenarios.
I don't want to totally lambaste the series, it was entertaining, but did not get near the quality or appeal of several similar genre exploits.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 01, 2009, 06:41:33 PM
(http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/1557/107882mediumrs2.jpg)
Coming together to solve a series of murders in New York City are a DEA agent (Wahlberg) whose family was slain as part of a conspiracy and an assassin (Kunis) out to avenge her sister's death. The duo will be hunted by the police, the mob, and a ruthless corporation.
Disappointing adaptation and possibly the 2nd worst film I've watched Wahlberg in.
The noir film setting, the effects (especially the hallucinations), and the principle of the film taken from the video game are wonderful, sadly it doesn't make much sense and is way too far fetched.
At one point he faces up to about 20 security guards who are armed with machine guns, whilst he has just a pistol, and only 10 feet between them. Somehow they shoot about 1000 times and miss him, whilst his never ending magazine picks them off with little trouble as he 'dramatically flees' the scene. And then his pump action shotgun that allows him to fire it with the speed of an automatic?? And let's not even get to how the star was shot so many times without bleeding or getting hurt. Maybe the director thought this was a game and not the movie, made with easy mode chosen.
I finished the film thinking why end here?, what happened?, and was it worth it?
:-\
Post by: Najemikon on February 01, 2009, 07:00:20 PM
Maybe the director thought this was a game and not the movie, made with easy mode chosen.
I reckon you've hit the nail on the head. I have no wish to see this film as I haven't seen one decent comment (poor old Whalberg, after this and The Happening), but I bet half the problem with this and other game adaptations is that the director has not played the game, or even any other game since 1987. So he has no idea how sophisticated they actually can be now and thinks he's making it for action junkies who don't give a shit about even the tiniest hint of realism.
Post by: richierich on February 01, 2009, 07:33:51 PM
CRASH
(http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/3908/44169mediumxd1.jpg)
Crash is a powerful, moving and provocative drama following the intersecting lives of a diverse group of people in Los Angeles. Using a sophisticated, layered structure to tell the stories of a multi-racial group of characters as their lives inter-connect through a sequence of events around a car accident, we see their prejudices, tensions and hopes…and how tough, yet uplifting life in the “melting pot” that is Los Angeles, can be.
An intricate and smart movie exploring the effect people have on one another as they come into contact in various scenarios in everyday life, stereotyping one another in terms of race, nationality, or wealth. It shows such an imperfect and complex world full of twists and turns, of good and bad, and the results of prejudging and assumptions.
Multi-talented cast portraying roles with excellent chararacterisation, they make a fine job of blending the film together and never outshining each other, and are shown enough that you become emotionally involved. The movie has much to say, predominently concerning racism, and it is told in a novel undepressing way, I actually finished the film feeling uplifted.
Top marks for the soundtrack, and hats off to Matt Dillon for proving he isn't a one trick pony.
A professional and well crafted film.
;D
Post by: richierich on February 01, 2009, 07:35:36 PM
Maybe the director thought this was a game and not the movie, made with easy mode chosen.
I reckon you've hit the nail on the head. I have no wish to see this film as I haven't seen one decent comment (poor old Whalberg, after this and The Happening), but I bet half the problem with this and other game adaptations is that the director has not played the game, or even any other game since 1987. So he has no idea how sophisticated they actually can be now and thinks he's making it for action junkies who don't give a shit about even the tiniest hint of realism.
Yep, thats the only conclusion I could also make :cheers:
Post by: richierich on February 01, 2009, 07:37:51 PM
The Greatest Show on Earth
(http://img105.imageshack.us/img105/4720/80153mediumfb8.jpg)
Step right up for Cecil B. DeMille's spectacular Academy Award®-winning Best Picture - 'The Greatest Show On Earth'. The master showman brings the thrills, chills and exhilaration of the Ringling Brothers-Barnum & Bailey Circus to the screen via an Oscar®-winning story and an all-star cast that includes Betty Hutton, Cornel Wilde, Charlton Heston, Dorothy Lamour, Gloria Grahame, James Stewart and Lyle Bettger - plus a few surprises! It's action, romance, laughs and treachery all under the big top, culminating in an incredible train disaster that threatens the very lives and livelihood of the traveling troupe. Grab a bag of popcorn, take a ringside seat and get ready to experience the excitement and drama of 'The Greatest Show On Earth'!
How did this beat High Noon to the best picture?
Clearly made for the big screen, the cast of thousands and multiple scenes within one would no doubt have been better to watch in the cinema. It does come across rather lack-lustre and dated, and I was underwhelmed by Heston as the lead.
By far the best part of the film was watching the real circus performers, both human and animals, totally spectacular performances and something that must have been amazing to see live, in truth I would have preferred watching them without the piss poor editing and wet dialogue of the movie itself.
The worst part besides the corny acting, the appalling 'train crash' scene, Hornby must have been rubbing his hands together!
Seen once, you'd have to be a clown to see it twice
:-\
Post by: richierich on February 02, 2009, 09:39:09 PM
Sunrise
(http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/1009/18843mediumef4.jpg)
SUNRISE chronicles the murderous desires--and ultimate repentance--of a wayward husband. Deeply attracted by a sophisticated vamp who worms her way into the couple's simple country existence, the man agrees to take his wife into the city by rowboat...with plans to drown her on the way. In the midst of their journey, however, he realises he cannot go through with the act. But the pure and innocent wife has already understood what he meant to do. Heartbroken, and with tear-filled eyes, she stumbles away from him through the city streets. Now he must find some way to win her back -- and prevent the fates from punishing him for his misdeeds...Director F.W. Murnau, and cinematographers Charles Rosher and Karl Struss, created stunning expressionist imagery that poignantly captures the characters' complex desires and points-of-view. This is one of the most visually gorgeous and emotionally rich silent films ever made.
A film to watch for historical and posterity reasons, it isn't by any means dreadful, especially considering it was made over 80 years ago and is silent, but of course it is so dated now to make it difficult to get in to.
Much fawning, over-acting, moody shots etc as one would expect, but also a surprising amount of at the time ground-breaking camera angles, moving shots, background techniques which you must marvel at.
The male lead is uncannily like Russell Crowe, and Janet Gaynor is gorgeous as the wife. The interesting element for me was watching the city behind the main shot, the architecture, fashion, automation etc, you really do get a great sense of atmosphere from Murnau's films, and his use of slapstick to lighten the mood is very well timed.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 02, 2009, 09:54:40 PM
Ordinary People
(http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/189/10299mediumbk1.jpg)
Devastated by the loss of their older son, Calvin (Donald Sutherland) and Beth (Mary Tyler Moore), a well-to-do suburban couple, are trying to rebuild their lives after their younger son, Conrad (Timothy Hutton), attempts suicide. While Beth, who always favored the elder son, retreats into an icy, emotionless shell, Calvin tries to draw Conrad back into the family and into life as a teenager. Conrad sings in the choir and returns to the swim team, but both his brother's death and his own experiences traumatize him. Conrad reluctantly begins therapy sessions with Berger (Judd Hirsch), which allow him some respite from the unbearable grief and guilt he carries with him. As Conrad makes strides, Calvin realizes that he no longer knows his wife and is both saddened and angered by how seemingly emotionless she has become. A classic portrait of family life in the face of tragedy, Robert Redford's award-winning directorial debut is moving and thought provoking. Based on the novel by Judith Guest, the film features the debuts of Timothy Hutton and Elizabeth McGovern as well as outstanding performances from Moore and Sutherland.
Moving and emotional, at times hard to watch, this tugs at a variety of your viewing emotions. Understated direction works perfectly, Timothy Hutton as the suicidal teenager seeking an understanding ear through therapy is brilliant. Redford developed the characters slowly and thoroughly through the film, and with such excellent writing and dialogue the storyline is poignant and recognisable.
This will not be to everyones taste, but I defy anyone not to be moved if they have the patience to see it through.
;D
Post by: Najemikon on February 03, 2009, 01:48:49 AM
How did this beat High Noon to the best picture?
Clearly made for the big screen, the cast of thousands and multiple scenes within one would no doubt have been better to watch in the cinema. It does come across rather lack-lustre and dated, and I was underwhelmed by Heston as the lead.
By far the best part of the film was watching the real circus performers, both human and animals, totally spectacular performances and something that must have been amazing to see live, in truth I would have preferred watching them without the piss poor editing and wet dialogue of the movie itself.
The worst part besides the corny acting, the appalling 'train crash' scene, Hornby must have been rubbing his hands together!
Seen once, you'd have to be a clown to see it twice
Boooo! :( Where did I leave my squeaky nose and size 19 shoes? It's a creaky old melodrama, but harmless. I've seen it loads of times and it's a decent film. James Stewart makes it for me.
As to picking it over High Noon, well that's easy enough. High Noon is a very political film made at a time when politics were playing too big a part in Hollywood. To reward it would have been... impossible. The writer would soon be blacklisted as a suspected communist by the ridiculous McCarthy witch-hunts and some see the plot as a metaphor for those who stood their ground against the House of Un-American Activities, even when their supposed friends turn witness (the towns people who stand by). Now John Wayne is one of my favourite actors, Howard Hawks a favourite director and I hold Rio Bravo in very high regard, but they made that film with pitchforks and lynch mobs, as a right-wing retort to High Noon.
I suppose it just proves the enduring magic of cinema that people can make something as good as Rio Bravo for all the very wrong reasons.
Quote from: Wikipedia
"John Wayne strongly despised the film because he felt it was an allegory for blacklisting, which he and his good friends Ward Bond and Howard Hawks actively supported. In his Playboy interview from May 1971, Wayne stated he considered High Noon "the most un-American thing I’ve ever seen in my whole life"[4] and went on to say he would never regret having helped blacklist liberal screenwriter Carl Foreman from Hollywood. He later teamed up with director Howard Hawks to make Rio Bravo as a conservative response. Ironically, Cooper himself had conservative political views, and was a "friendly witness" to the HUAC several years earlier, although he did not "name names" and later strongly opposed blacklisting,[5] and Wayne also accepted Cooper's Academy Award for the role as Cooper was unable to attend the presentation.
The Left appreciated the film for what they believed was an allegory of people (Hollywood people, particular) that were afraid to stand up to HUAC. However, the film would eventually gain the respect of people with conservative/anti-communist views. Ronald Reagan, a conservative and fervent anti-communist, would appreciate the film because the main character had a strong dedication to duty, law, and the well being of the town, despite their refusal to help."
Post by: richierich on February 03, 2009, 10:39:45 AM
Boooo! :( Where did I leave my squeaky nose and size 19 shoes? It's a creaky old melodrama, but harmless. I've seen it loads of times and it's a decent film. James Stewart makes it for me.
I'll concede the Jimmy Stewart comment, he was head and shoulders above everyone else in the film, but I raise you the most ridiculous scenario of Betty Hutton 'singing' on the trampoline accompanied by a washboard and jug bottle :tease:
Post by: Najemikon on February 03, 2009, 03:07:01 PM
Post by: richierich on February 04, 2009, 11:43:31 PM
Grand Hotel
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9598/19189mediumdf3.jpg)
The creme de la creme of MGM's pantheon gathers at the luxurious GRAND HOTEL, where "nothing ever happens." Greta Garbo is at her most radiant and poetic as the melancholy ballerina who finds a reason to dance again after she falls for the down-and-out Baron (John Barrymore) who planned to rob her. In another room a ravishing young secretary (Joan Crawford) succumbs to the advances of an arrogant industrialist (Wallace Beery). In yet another, a fatally ill office clerk (Lionel Barrymore) spends his life savings in a desperate effort to derive some pleasure from this bleak and brief existence. Downstairs at the bar, a disfigured doctor (Lewis Stone) dispenses wry commentary as people come and go. This precedent-setting ensemble piece of frothy, bubbly, tear-jerking super soap cemented the A-list status of its director, Edmund Goulding. It's an oft-imitated, never duplicated spectacle; the old Hollywood star system lighting up the sky with all the wattage at its disposal.
For such an expensive Hollywood epic and an Oscar winner, this was pants. Yawnsville all the way through, 1932 must have been a very lean year for releases if this was the best offering. Even trying to put everything in context regarding when this movie was produced, I could not warm to it at all, neither was it a comedy or a drama.
The plot does not stand modern day examination, I found the storyline stiff, the acting wooden, Garbo wanders around in a trance looking depressed, wanting 'to be alone', and the murder scene laughable even considering the rules regarding showing violence at the time of production. Perhaps the only escapee is Crawford as the stenographer, who shines above the rest.
Most interesting part when watching this film was a phone call I received from a double glazing salesman trying to cold sell me new windows, I wouldn't let him go for fear of having to press play again to watch the rest of movie!
Post by: richierich on February 05, 2009, 11:08:33 AM
Hamlet
(http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/3636/41xb6c9jkblsl500aa240tl6.jpg)
Winner of four Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Actor, Sir Laurence Olivier's 'Hamlet' continues to be the most compelling version of Shakespeare's beloved tragedy. Olivier is at his most inspired - both as director and as the melancholy Dane himself - as he breathes new life into the words of one of the world's greatest dramatists. Criterion is proud to present 'Hamlet' in a luminous black-and-white digital transfer.
Thoust twatched thine grandee purveyance beyond thy western star etc etc :devil:
Broody short adaptation of Hamlet, in comparison to Branaghs which was several hours long. The B&W production, eerie music, and specifically the spirit of Hamlets father who stalks the castle make for an imposing movie. This is said to be the best acted Hamlet ever, I can't compare so I take their word for it, I can confirm that many scenes were compelling and the interactions at times superb. A little direction was annoying as we constantly were lead in POV mode down countless empty corridors.
I struggle to understand Shakespeare, and I don't really like it, but I would say this movie is pretty accessible and not particularly hard to follow, and does allow us to view possibly one of the best Shakespearian actors in his prime.
Not my cup of tea, perhaps I am a peasant?
:-\
Post by: richierich on February 06, 2009, 10:36:55 AM
(http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/8373/115011mediumzt9.jpg)
Your favorite castaways are back - still together and still lost! One of the top movies of the year, DreamWorks Animation's MADAGASCAR: ESCAPE 2 AFRICA is "even better than the first!" (Mark Hyman, Fox-TV). You'll laugh out loud as this outrageous comedy takes you on an African adventure like no other.
Below par and an inferior film to the original offering. Not saying it's not fun, for the right age they will love it I'm sure! Several belly laugh moments but the storyline lacks originality and is cliched. For this old viewer I got bored soon after the plane crash, and just hung on for the best parts of the film that involved.....
The penguins , who are by miles the funniest part of the film, just watching them for 90 minutes would be great, they rock!
Move over Dreamworks, Pixar still have the edge.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 06, 2009, 10:51:37 AM
On The Waterfront
(http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/9704/6115mediumew1.jpg)
Marlon Brando gives one of the screen's most electrifying performances as Best Actor in this 1954 Academy Award® winner for Best Film. Ex-fighter Terry Malloy (Brando) could have been a contender, but now toils for boss Johnny Friendly (Lee J. Cobb) on the gang-ridden waterfront. Terry is guilt-stricken, however, when he lures a rebellious worker to his death. But it takes the love of Edie Doyle (Eva Marie Saint), the dead man's sister, to show Terry how low he has fallen. When his crooked brother Charley the Gent (Rod Steiger) is brutally murdered for refusing to kill him, Terry battles to crush Friendly's underworld empire. Directed by Elia Kazan (A Streetcar Named Desire) and written by Budd Schulberg (What Makes Sammy Run?), this unforgettable drama about Terry's redemption is among the most acclaimed of all films.
Enjoyable movie made brilliant through charismatic Brando's improvisation in the role of Terry Malloy, he literally brings the character to life and you feel yourself totally absorbed in the film. I am not a Brando mega-fan, but watch this performance and you can see the influence he made towards later stars such as Pacino and DeNiro.
The storyline is fairly run of the mill, but the settings away from studios were much more realistic and brought the film to life, unusual locations from what I have seen of this period of Hollywood, and a major plus for the viewer.
If you don't own many older B&W dvds, you would not go far wrong in adding this to your collection.
"It coulda beena contender" for top marks, but not quite.
;D
Post by: richierich on February 09, 2009, 10:30:13 AM
(http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/2857/113482mediumfq2.jpg)
When two gunmen, Virgil Cole and Everett Hitch, arrive in Appaloosa they find a small, dusty and lawless town suffering at the hands of renegade rancher Randall Bragg. Bragg has not only taken supplies, horses and women for his own, but also has left the city marshal and a deputy for dead. In Bragg they find an unusually wily adversary who raises the stakes by playing with emotions. It is now up to Cole and Hitch to stand against the actions of the renegade rancher, which have already taken their toll on the town.
Felt like a break from my Oscar marathon and popped in this Western, a buy I had made simply because of Ed Harris being involved as Director and lead actor.
It had all the right ingredients in a currently unpopular genre with filmmakers, but it is not destined to be a classic Western. The storyline is very convincing, and with a very original final act was a satisfying finale. The actual 'two good guys defend a hapless town' premis is rather predictable, but the solid acting and sub-plots move you past this. Zellweger shines in her role as the flirty lady, and Mortensen from Lord of the Rings a surprising plus as '8-gauge' Everett Hitch.
However there are a few things that pull the film down, the direction is rather haphazard and blocky, Ed Harris was a bit too old to be a convincing hard man, the film is unnecessarily long, and Timothy Spall trying to cover his brummie accent and fashion an 'Old West' American accent was laughable, why would they cast him in this??
Overall an okay film, but I wouldn't recommend you break your neck to see it.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 09, 2009, 10:44:38 AM
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/9979/2590mediumvj6.jpg)
Special agent 007 (Sean Connery) has just come face to face with one of the most notorious villians of all time. And now he'll have to outwit and outgun this powerful tycoon to prevent him from cashing in on a devious scheme to raid Fort Knox – and obliterate the world economy!
Watched with my son, both seen it several times, and for me the best Bond film I have enjoyed, we both loved it again despite nearly being able to quote lines, it is truly endlessly entertaining.
Why is this such a classic Bond film?
The major introduction of gadgets to 007
The Aston Martin
Gert Frobe as Auric Goldfinger - a great villain
Pussy Galore (is that not the best Bond girl name??)
Oddjob and his novel hat
The gold plated death
Guy hamiltons direction
The laser scene
Shirly Bassey belting out an amazing theme song
etc etc etc
I wanted to be Bond after seeing this film originally, it is truly superb, timeless, funny, taut, an example of a big budget well spent.
Very happy to have watched it yet again :thumbup:
Post by: richierich on February 09, 2009, 10:47:36 AM
Chicago
(http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/5791/14177mediumeo8.jpg)
Sexy stars Catherine Zeta-Jones ('Traffic'. 'High Fidelity') and Renee Zellweger ('Bridget Jones's Diary', 'Jerry Maguire') heat up the screen with Hollywood favourite Richard Gere ('Unfaithful', 'Runaway Bride') in a dazzling spectacle that glides between the intrigue of rivalry and betrayal to sensational fantasies of music and dance!
At a time when crimes of passion result in celebrity headlines, nightclub sensation Velma Kelley (Zeta-Jones) and spotlight-seeking Roxie Hart (Zellweger) both find themselves sharing space on Chicago's famed Murderess Row. They also share Billy Flynn (Gere), the town's slickest lawyer with a talent for turning notorious defendants into local legends. But in Chicago, there's only room for one legend!
(This must be amazing on stage, I must get to see it soon in London, with the realisation that scenes and settings must be comprimised in comparison to Hollywood film)
Rather than just transporting the stage musical to the movie screen, Chicago uses techniques not available for the stage and as such is worthwhile viewing. The setting of windy 1920's Chicago is vivid, the mood dark and smoky, with a touch of razzmatazz through the main numbers. CZJ plays the perfect bitch, and Zellwegger is convincing in her role of Roxie and i wasn't sure if I loved or hated her at different times. But Richard Gere - seriously! He may have been a perfect cool cat for the role of Billy Flynn, but as soon as he opened his gob to sing I wished the hamster had climbed back in as that could only have improved his singing voice!
Overall I am glad to have finally watched this film, I am not sure how it plundered the oscars, perhaps in its sheer novelty. The music was first-rate and memorable despite some of the aforementioned poor singing, the slick direction is evident, and I have to admit CZJ does actually have some talent.
Despite not being a major musical fan, having suspended disbelief I did enjoy this.
;D
Post by: richierich on February 10, 2009, 10:57:21 AM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/2240/106723mediumrl5.jpg)
From Touchstone Pictures comes the powerful and uplifting World War II epic Miracle At St. Anna, directed by acclaimed filmmaker Spike Lee (The Inside Man). Stationed in Tuscany, Italy, four members of the U.S. Army's all-black 92nd Infantry Division, the Buffalo Soldiers, are trapped behind enemy lines after one of them risks his life to save a traumatized Italian boy. Separated from their unit, they find themselves in a remote Tuscan village where they experience the tragedy and the triumph of war. Based on the highly praised novel by James McBride, and filled with exceptional battle scenes and action, it's a gripping and inspiring story that will touch the goodness within us all and never let go.
Overly long but surprisingly good film, there were a number of positives for a film I began watching with little expectations.
Firstly the story is excellent and unpredictable, I may even invest in the book to delve into the characters more, and it has been adapted to film competently. The settings are perfect, once you accept that a few mistakes were made concerning some of the modern day background signs, roadways and markings which have slipped into the movie. It is entertaining and moving all in one, Omar Benson Miller is absolutely perfect in his role as the BFG soldier protecting the young boy, and I wonder if he is the new Forest Whitaker?
I am sure this will be described by many as a poignant film detailing the sacrifices and contributions made by African American soldiers during WWII, but avoiding the politics of the issue I purely enjoyed it on its entertainment value.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 10, 2009, 11:01:42 AM
You Can't take it With You
(http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/6506/11243mediumdq4.jpg)
Academy Award® winner James Stewart (1940 Best Actor, The Philadelphia Story and 1985 Honorary Oscar®), Jean Arthur, Academy Award® winner Lionel Barrymore (1931 Best Actor, A Free Soul) and Edward Arnold star in this classic screwball comedy. Based on the phenomenally successful Kaufman-Hart play, You Can't Take It with You was directed by Frank Capra and won two Academy Awards® (1938 Best Picture, Best Director) and garnered five more nominations. It was Capra's third Oscar® for directing.
Arthur stars as Alice Sycamore, the stable family member of an offbeat clan of free spirits who falls for Stewart, the down-to-earth son of a snooty, wealthy family. Amid a backdrop of confusion, the two very different families rediscover the simple joys of life.
A film where everything comes in small doses, at times funny, slightly uplifting, a touch moralistic, touching and vaguely inspirational.
I'd hoped for a great performance by James Stewart in this, but as the young stick thin drawling fiance, I was pretty underwhelmed with his performance. Fortunately it was bolstered by Jean Arthur, Edward Arnold and of course Lionel Barrymore.
Overall I found it a little bit disappointing, the so-called liberated characters came across as annoying, it is way too over sentimental, and I could not swallow the fact that big business and corporate greed can be beaten by sitting down playing a harmonica!
:D
Post by: richierich on February 12, 2009, 10:23:07 AM
Tom Jones
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8066/11029mediumeh0.jpg)
Winner of four Academy Awards including Best Picture, and featuring a cast of superb players headed by the Oscar-nominated Albert Finney and Susannah York, this wickedly funny classic has been hailed as the best comedy ever made.
No one has ever lived so freely and carelessly as Tom Jones. Abandoned at birth and raised by a wealthy squire, Tom romps through English society, leading a lusty life of brawling and bed-hopping...until his bawdy behaviour causes him to be sent away from his family, his home and the only woman he's ever truly loved. But some men never learn, and soon Tom's escapades land him in the company of reckless scoundrels, the boudoirs of more women...and, finally, in jail. Will Tom's charm save him... or will the gallows be his last swing?
Bawdy comedy that is meritable in places, but you continually get a feeling viewing the film that too many segments were like a carry-on film, or a Benny Hill sketch, without the laughs. It is notable for the lewd narration, which must have been an eye-opener even at this period of history in the early swinging 60's.
The direction, score and the actors talking and winking to camera all seemed ahead of its time, Albert Finney is a revelation to me as I have only seen him in recent films, but clearly at this stage of his career he was a heart throb actor.
Very easy to watch, entertaining if slightly overlong, and a costume period romp that was refreshing.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 12, 2009, 10:26:22 AM
Out of Africa
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/9595/5510mediumbd2.jpg)
Adapted from Isak Dinesen's novel, OUT OF AFRICA, this film plaintively tells the story of two troubled adults who meet and fall in love in the African wilderness. Karen Blixen-Flecke (Meryl Streep) is a modern woman, caught in the shortcomings of a practical marriage. Finch Hatton (Robert Redford) is a gallant British hunter, lonely, but unable to commit. As they two meet and begin a torrid affair, they set out on an epic adventure in the badlands of Africa--an adventure that real-life Karen Blixen-Flecke would later WRITE under the pen name Isak Dinesen. Sydney Pollack's opus, OUT OF AFRICA, is a full, visually compelling film. Its storyline evokes a plethora of emotions, ranging from fear and loathing to hope and the elation of love. Robert Redford and Meryl Streep are electric as the two damaged infidels in love. A key American film, OUT OF AFRICA is not to be missed.
Absorbing and fascinating true storyline based on an extraordinary and enchanting backdrop, with top-rate cinematography squeezing out amazing African scenes at every opportunity.
It is a warm romance, sad in places, and with the underlying message that you cannot change people how ever much you love them. It was overly long at nearly 3 hours, but the ending was worth waiting for. Streep is at her best in this role, but for me I felt there was a lack of chemistry between her and Redford.
Captivating, top rate musical accompiniment, and a glimpse at a bygone era, this I would recommended for those with a compassionate nature :D
Post by: richierich on February 16, 2009, 10:21:52 AM
(http://img93.imageshack.us/img93/3493/107888mediumhk6.jpg)
"Body of Lies" is based on "Washington Post" columnist David Ignatius' 2007 novel about a CIA operative, Roger Ferris, who uncovers a lead on a major terrorist leader suspected to be operating out of Jordan. When Ferris devises a plan to infiltrate his network, he must first win the backing of cunning CIA veteran Ed Hoffman and the collegial, but perhaps suspect, head of Jordanian intelligence. Although ostensibly his allies, Ferris questions how far he can really trust these men without putting his entire operation--and his life--on the line.
Topical film, overly long, slow to start, and the trailer was misleading regarding the storyline.
DeCraprio plays a similar portrayal he mastered in Blood Diamond, Crowe acting mainly in a different timezone could literally have been a telephone operator.
But when the film warmed up it did become engrossing, at times brutally violent and gory (torture scene) it did a very good job on how I assume tracking and capturing a terrorist cell would really be like. It also attempted to portray the terrorists viewpoint, and also the daily lives of those innocent people caught up in these 'war' zones.
This film ticked all of the boxes, but just does not have the X factor that makes you drool for more.
A special mention for actor Mark Strong, who played Jordanian security chief Hani, very impressive in his role.
:)
Post by: richierich on February 16, 2009, 10:26:43 AM
(http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/8950/2670mediumvx4.jpg)
The thrills never stop as Agent 007 (Sean Connery) goes above the call of duty - and to the bottom of the ocean - to track down a villainous criminal who's holding millions hostage and threatening to plunge the world into a nuclear holocaust!
Overboard on the gadgets with this outing, and the plot suffers accordingly, but this is still a fun movie which i enjoyed. It is not a personal Bond favourite for me, the villain was not as convincing, the bad girls not as bad, although Claudine Auger is eye candy of the highest order. Connery seemed to become a parody of the Bond character, the lines too predictable and delivered with an apparent monotone disinterest, and the underwater scenes never-ending.
However despite the cheesy one-liners, sexual innuendos, exotic backdrops etc, I find as with the other early 007 films more realism in the storyline and characterisation than in later attempts. The music as always is top notch, and although the action is somewhat dated, in context to production year it is easily appreciatable.
;D
Post by: richierich on February 17, 2009, 10:27:37 AM
(http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3663/107089mediumpc1.jpg)
In 1976, a small American winery bested the exalted French wines of the time and sent the wine industry into a tizzy--putting California wines on the map for good. Based on a true story, "Bottle Shock" chronicles the events leading up to the famous "Judgment of Paris" tastings, told through the lives of father and son, Jim and Bo Barrett. A former real estate attorney, Jim has sacrificed everything to realize his dream of creating the perfect hand-crafted chardonnay. His business, however, is struggling, and he's not only trying to overcome differences with his slacker son, but is also fighting off the creditors. Meanwhile in Paris, unwitting British wine shop owner Steven Spurrier hopes to revive his own failing business by sponsoring a competition which will pit the traditional French powerhouse against the California upstarts. Little did Steven and Jim realize that they were both on course to change the history of wine forever.
Enjoyable tale based on a true story, this was a pleasant yarn with a 'feel-good' after-view factor.
The storyline meanders on a comfortable path, the acting is solid from all the cast besides a disappointing Bill Pullman, who looks like he would rather be somewhere else. I wasn't aware of the history of Californian wine, and how it became so well renowned in Europe, but the movie clearly explains the history from the 70's in a very entertaining way.
This is not an 'amazing' or 'groundbreaking' film, it is however a goold old fashioned story-telling that educates and entertains all in one.
:)
Post by: richierich on February 17, 2009, 10:41:54 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/6207/screamers2jk5.jpg)
It’s been thirteen years since the robotic killing machines known as Screamers destroyed the human population of Sirius 6B. But now a distress signal brings a team of rescuers to the supposedly abandoned planet. Can it be a long-lost colony of human survivors? Or have the Screamers evolved into something even more sinister…a half-man/half-machine hybrid that needs to escape Sirius 6B to finish its mission: the complete annihilation of the human race?
There are times you finish watching a film and regret wasting your time, and others where you purchase a dvd with a lot of expectations and anticipation, only to rue wasting your hard earned dosh. Sadly, this dvd leaves you with both feelings.
It is truly one of the worst cases of a sequel cashing in on the successful original film that I have seen, the actors are second-rate, effects largely unimpressive, storyline non-existent, action sedated, and the suspense rare.
The only highlights were some of the killing shots by the robot/humans, trully gruesome fist in head shots that were impressively delivered.
By far the worst part of the whole movie is the ending, which is so BAD and predictable, that it is nearly funny, the shame is I fear it is a stepping stone for another sequel - god forbid!
Avoid this dismal movie :yawn:
Post by: richierich on February 17, 2009, 10:45:34 AM
Rebecca
(http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/7977/3208mediumjq9.jpg)
"LAST NIGHT, I DREAMT I WENT TO MANDERLEY AGAIN."
Rebecca's haunting opening line conjures the entirety of Alfred Hitchcock's romantic, suspenseful, elegant film. A young woman (Joan Fontaine) believes her every dream has come true when her whirlwind romance with the dashing Maxim de Winter culminates in marriage. But she soon realizes that Rebecca, the late first Mrs. de Winter, haunts both the temperamental, brooding Maxim and the de Winter mansion, Manderley. In order for Maxim and the new Mrs. de Winter to have a future, Rebecca's spell must be broken and the mystery of her violent dead unraveled. The first collaboration between producer David O. Selznick and Hitchcock, Rebecca was adapted from Daphne du Maurier´s popular novel and won the 1940 Academy Award™ for Best Picture and Cinematography
Distant looks, pouting, meaningful glances, crap backgrounds, orchestral crescendos, stiff acting, sharp intakes of breath etc etc. There is a lot wrong with this film 70 years on, it is almost at times the perfect example of why so many people today would not sit through an old movie.
However...(and before Jon jumps all over me) scratch underneath and persevere, and you are treated to an atmospheric drama with a touch of romance, with enough suspense and plot twists to keep you guessing. Hitchcock creates a melancholy, perhaps dark?, mood for this classic, and Judith Anderson is memorably outstanding as the spooky (lesbian??) Mrs. Danvers. Joan Fontaine is convincing as mousy Mrs De Winter part 2, but I was never sure if Olivier was the right choice as lead actor?
It is tame by todays standards, at times the acting is comical, Hitchcock made better films that didn't win an Academy Award for best picture, but once you overcome the negatives all the positives filter through to a film that is definately worth watching and I whole-heartedly recommend it.
:D
Post by: richierich on February 19, 2009, 11:15:01 AM
(http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/8039/106703mediumhd9.jpg)
Clint Eastwood directs Oscar® winner Angelina Jolie and Oscar® nominee John Malkovich in a riveting and unforgettable true story.
Los Angeles, 1928. When a single mother Christine Collins (Jolie) leaves for work, her son vanishes without a trace. Five months later, the police reunite mother and son; but he isn´t her boy. Driven by one woman´s relentless quest for the truth, the case exposes a world of corruption, captivates the public and changes LA forever.
This emotionally gripping story illustrates the profound power of a mother´s love in "a mesmerizing film that burns in the memory" (Peter Travers, Rolling Stone).
Wow - can this really be true?? It is so difficult to comprehend one humans ability for evil, and a whole police departments ability to be so corrupt, uncaring and downright despicable in its actions. You question did this happen, and not that many years ago either.
It is a surprisingly powerful film, as a parent you find yourself swapping places and imagining how awful these tragic events must have been. Jolie proves that underneath all the gloss is a truly talented actress, and she dominates the film with some very moving and emotional scenes. Seasoned director Eastwood displays once again his ability to adapt a true story into a credable, immersing and harrowing movie, sure to weather well with age. With the settings reminiscent of LA Confidential, the whole feel of the film is absorbing and convincing, attention to detail was superb. The trial scenes at the end were the only disappointment, a little bit too 'Americanised' for my personal taste.
A disturbing movie, a storyline that I have not stopped thinking about, and some performances both on and off the set that make this production stand apart. :thumbup:
Post by: richierich on February 19, 2009, 11:17:34 AM
(http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/4430/4153mediumty5.jpg)
This swinging spoof of Ian Fleming's spy hero concerns an aging James Bond (David Niven), reluctantly dragged out of retirement to face down the evil crime clique called SMERSH. In order to confound the enemy, the Secret Service sends five other agents, also under the name "Bond," and all six converge on the titular casino. Woody Allen, as the retiring superspy's nephew, causes havoc, while a flood of famous faces (and directors) revel in the silliness. And there's a great Burt Bacharach score to boot.
Take a dash of a poor Austin Powers, some carry-on, a large helping of pink panther, and the names from an Ian Fleming novel, and you get this disappointing effort. It is a shame Niven did not secure decent films throughout his career, he ended up typecast as the aristocrat British gentleman, and this is a perfect example of that curse.
A chaotic disjointed affair, perhaps because of the various writers and directors involved, and a pretty shameless waste of acting talent. To classify this spoof as a James Bond movie suitable for our marathon is like comparing an apple with an orange, besides the title and character names there is no resemblence to Flemings books and the now familiar Bond movie formula.
:yawn:
Post by: Najemikon on February 19, 2009, 01:44:23 PM
Distant looks, pouting, meaningful glances, crap backgrounds, orchestral crescendos, stiff acting, sharp intakes of breath etc etc. There is a lot wrong with this film 70 years on, it is almost at times the perfect example of why so many people today would not sit through an old movie.
However...(and before Jon jumps all over me) scratch underneath and persevere, and you are treated to an atmospheric drama with a touch of romance, with enough suspense and plot twists to keep you guessing. Hitchcock creates a melancholy, perhaps dark?, mood for this classic, and Judith Anderson is memorably outstanding as the spooky (lesbian??) Mrs. Danvers. Joan Fontaine is convincing as mousy Mrs De Winter part 2, but I was never sure if Olivier was the right choice as lead actor?
It is tame by todays standards, at times the acting is comical, Hitchcock made better films that didn't win an Academy Award for best picture, but once you overcome the negatives all the positives filter through to a film that is definately worth watching and I whole-heartedly recommend it.
:D
Jump all over you? Never! :P That was a very good review. It is old and creaky, which Hitchcock always avoided, but here he was trapped by the same producer of Gone With the Wind. On the Criterion DVD, there is an excerpt from the famous interviews with Truffaut. He asks Hitch what he thinks of Rebecca... "Well it's not a Hitchcock film, is it?", he answered :laugh:
Post by: richierich on February 19, 2009, 03:35:56 PM
Jump all over you? Never! :P That was a very good review. It is old and creaky, which Hitchcock always avoided, but here he was trapped by the same producer of Gone With the Wind. On the Criterion DVD, there is an excerpt from the famous interviews with Truffaut. He asks Hitch what he thinks of Rebecca... "Well it's not a Hitchcock film, is it?", he answered :laugh:
I was conscious that you gave this top marks 5/5, as you have most of the Academy Award winners. Maybe my marks have reflected more my personal leanings towards more modern films as a choice, as I struggle to get overly engrossed in many films over 30 years old. I appreciate them contextually more than enjoy them. :hmmmm:
Or it may be that you are much older than I am and saw some of these films at your local picturehouse after the war? :P
Post by: Najemikon on February 19, 2009, 04:28:12 PM
Jump all over you? Never! :P That was a very good review. It is old and creaky, which Hitchcock always avoided, but here he was trapped by the same producer of Gone With the Wind. On the Criterion DVD, there is an excerpt from the famous interviews with Truffaut. He asks Hitch what he thinks of Rebecca... "Well it's not a Hitchcock film, is it?", he answered :laugh:
I was conscious that you gave this top marks 5/5, as you have most of the Academy Award winners. Maybe my marks have reflected more my personal leanings towards more modern films as a choice, as I struggle to get overly engrossed in many films over 30 years old. I appreciate them contextually more than enjoy them. :hmmmm:
Or it may be that you are much older than I am and saw some of these films at your local picturehouse after the war? :P
Looking at your avatar, Rich, I think I can safely assume you are the elder member by some margin! :devil: Read the first line of my One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest review... :D
I generally don't mark against a films age, because even if its dated, it evokes the period better for me and I find it very easy to get engrossed in any story. A story like Rebecca is inherently dated anyway. It's when the story doesn't make sense because of some poor element, be it the writing, direction or character, that I mark it down. Passion is another plus point for me and Rebecca was going to be a 4/5 or even a 3/5 before Hitchcock's sensibilites kicked in proper.
The one thing I always find hard to stomach in old movies is instant marriage. Not even after a whirlwind romance! It's a case of boy meets girl, girl says "hello", boy says "marry me", girl says "I thought you'd never ask"... ??? It's obviously enforced by the Hays office: if a man says he loves a girl, then he should do the right thing and
Post by: richierich on February 19, 2009, 04:44:33 PM
Post by: Najemikon on February 19, 2009, 05:43:02 PM
Post by: richierich on February 20, 2009, 11:06:44 PM
The Apartment
(http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3849/5951mediumri6.jpg)
Winner of five 1960 Academy Awards®* including Best Picture, The Apartment is legendary writer/director Billy Wilder at his scathing, satirical best, and one of the "finest comedies Hollywood has turned out" (Newsweek).
C.C. "Bud" Baxter (Jack Lemmon) knows the way to success in business… it's through the door of his apartment! By providing a perfect hideaway for philandering bosses, the ambitious young employee reaps a series of undeserved promotions. But when Bud lends the key to big boss J.D. Sheldrake (Fred MacMurray), he not only advances his career, but his own love life as well. For Sheldrake's mistress is the lovely Fran Kubelik (Shirley MacLaine), elevator girl and angel of Bud's dreams. Convinced that he is the only man for Fran, Bud must make the most important executive decision of his career: lose the girl… or his job.
Wonderful script and totally polished performances by Jack Lemmon and beautiful Shirley MaClaine, this satire is absolutely timeless and the plot intricate and complex, full of coincidences and mishaps.
Punchy and brutally honest, the infidelity is rife amongst the cynical money-driven office workers, and there is sadness in this unsavoury merry-go-round. But tender and tough Fran and wimpy Bud dream of something better, and whilst the film depicts a dark subject the movie always feels bright and breezy.
For anyone that has ever loved somone who loves someone else, it is easy to relate to. For anyone else it is a Hollywood masterpiece, and perfect examples of Wilders directing skills and an ideal platform for showcasing Lemmons acting strengths and mannerisms.
;D
Post by: richierich on February 20, 2009, 11:49:26 PM
Annie Hall
(http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/8471/2583mediumxa6.jpg)
Thought by many critics to be Woody Allen's magnum opus, Annie Hall won* four Oscars®, including Best Picture, and established Allen as the premier auteur filmmaker. Annie Hall confirmed that he had "completed the journey from comic to humorist, from comedy writer to wit, and from inventive moviemaker to creative artist." (Saturday Review)
Alvy Singer (Allen) is one of Manhattan’s most brilliant comedians, but when it comes to romance, his delivery needs a little work. Introduced by his best friend Rob (Tony Roberts), Alvy falls in love with the ditzy but delightful nightclub singer Annie Hall (Diane Keaton). When his own insecurities sabotage the affair, Annie is forced to leave Alvy for a new life – and lover (Paul Simon) – in Los Angeles. Knowing he may have lost Annie forever, Alvy’s willing to go to any lengths - even driving L.A.’s freeways – to recapture the only thing that ever mattered… true love.
I started this film not liking Woody Allen films...
Annie Hall is a quirky, neurotic, self-indulgent, introspective and at brief moments amusing (lobsters in the kitchen and the cinema queue) movie. One assumes this is very much based on the directors life, with depressive humour, self-referencing and sketchy storyline. At times the film is best described as irritating, and the 'direct to camera' scenes tedious.
A plus point was Diane Keaton, she was perfect for the role of the dizzy but spirited actress girlfriend, and tried valiantly to lift this film from an obsessed bore to something more entertaining.
If this is supposedly the best this director/actor can do, I will remain clear of his work. It was only an hour and a half long, but it dragged!
I ended this film still not liking Woody Allen :-\
Post by: Najemikon on February 21, 2009, 12:49:37 AM
Academy Award Best Picture winner 1960
The Apartment
(http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/3849/5951mediumri6.jpg)
Winner of five 1960 Academy Awards®* including Best Picture, The Apartment is legendary writer/director Billy Wilder at his scathing, satirical best, and one of the "finest comedies Hollywood has turned out" (Newsweek).
C.C. "Bud" Baxter (Jack Lemmon) knows the way to success in business… it's through the door of his apartment! By providing a perfect hideaway for philandering bosses, the ambitious young employee reaps a series of undeserved promotions. But when Bud lends the key to big boss J.D. Sheldrake (Fred MacMurray), he not only advances his career, but his own love life as well. For Sheldrake's mistress is the lovely Fran Kubelik (Shirley MacLaine), elevator girl and angel of Bud's dreams. Convinced that he is the only man for Fran, Bud must make the most important executive decision of his career: lose the girl… or his job.
Wonderful script and totally polished performances by Jack Lemmon and beautiful Shirley MaClaine, this satire is absolutely timeless and the plot intricate and complex, full of coincidences and mishaps.
Punchy and brutally honest, the infidelity is rife amongst the cynical money-driven office workers, and there is sadness in this unsavoury merry-go-round. But tender and tough Fran and wimpy Bud dream of something better, and whilst the film depicts a dark subject the movie always feels bright and breezy.
For anyone that has ever loved somone who loves someone else, it is easy to relate to. For anyone else it is a Hollywood masterpiece, and perfect examples of Wilders directing skills and an ideal platform for showcasing Lemmons acting strengths and mannerisms.
;D
Great review, Rich. I struggled a bit to say what I meant, but you've summed it up perfectly. :thumbup:
Post by: Najemikon on February 28, 2009, 08:40:49 PM
Academy Award Best Picture winner 1977
Annie Hall
(http://img515.imageshack.us/img515/8471/2583mediumxa6.jpg)
I started this film not liking Woody Allen films...
I ended this film still not liking Woody Allen :-\
:hysterical:
Sorry, Rich, I hadn't noticed you'd edited this post. I wanted to ask you, as you are now the closest to a Woody Allen expert out of the two of us ;), if you were to remove Woody Allen from this film and swap him for another actor/character even, would it improve?
I don't like the guy as a character. As a person, he's very funny when being interviewed and clips I've seen of Manhattan suggest I wouldn't be completely against his style of directing, but not when he's in them! I'm just not convinced by him at all and even less convinced by all the fawning that goes on around him as if he's some svengali.
I ask because I really like the clips I've seen of Vicky Christina Barcelona with Penelope Cruz. And because he now resembles a damp walnut, Allen wisely stays behind the camera and hopefully keeps his navel gazing neuroses with him. :-X
Post by: richierich on March 02, 2009, 10:04:28 AM
I have seen a feature where he was doing a one-man stand-up act, and that seemed to be more acceptable for me personally, I'd even go as far as saying it was funny.
Another actor in the role would have been more plausible, and as a non Woody fan a major improvement.
Post by: richierich on March 02, 2009, 10:15:01 AM
(http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/2219/105030medium.jpg)
Following SG-1 and The Ark of Truth, Stargate: Continuum is the latest chapter in this incredible series. The venerable Richard Dean Anderson returns to the fold, whilst the late Don S. Davis makes his final appearance as General George Hammond.
While SG-1 attends the execution of Ba'al, the last of the Goa'uld System Lords, Teal'c and Vala inexplicably disappear into thin air. Carter, Daniel and Mitchell race back to a world where history has been changed: the Stargate program has been erased from the timeline. As they try to convince the authorities what's happened, hundreds of Goa'uld motherships arrive in orbit, led by Ba'al, his queen Qetesh (Vala), and his first prime, Teal'c. The remaining SG-1 members must find the Stargate and set things right before the world is enslaved by the Goa'uld.
I enjoyed the first Stargate film, and hoped this was a direct carry-on from that. But clearly this movie has taken a lot from the regular TV series, which I've never seen, so i was lost on most of the characters for some time. Despite some lead actors looking a bit jaded (Beau Bridges appeared plastic), this is a good film in its own right and the effects were out of the top drawer.
The time travel return to earth to change history plot has been overdone in Hollywood, right back to ST First Contact of course, and it would of been nice to see a storyline with more originality. I also did not think they used the opportunity of the shifting timeline on earth well enough.
The Ark of Truth film still stands head and shoulders above this offering, but for fans of the TV series I am sure they will love it, others like myself can appreciate it as a reasonable sci-fi flick.
:D
Post by: DJ Doena on March 02, 2009, 10:52:14 AM
Post by: Najemikon on March 02, 2009, 08:33:55 PM
Post by: richierich on March 04, 2009, 09:56:24 PM
(http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/2585/2128medium.jpg)
Epic and glorious were America's dreams to master the sky and journey into space. Also epic and glorious is this landmark movie about one adventurous test pilot, seven brave astronauts and the colorful era that forged their heroism: Philip Kaufman's spectacular film of Tom Wolfe's 'The Right Stuff'.
Winner of four Academy Awards®; 'The Right Stuff' chronicles the story of the pioneering Mercury astronauts: men named Shepard, Grissom, Glenn, Carpenter, Schirra, Cooper and Slayton, the first Americans to ride a primitive spacecraft solo into a new frontier. Preceding them in the history books was the legendary Chuck Yeager, who far removed from the awesome media spotlight that would focus on the "spacemen" a decade later, became the first man to break the sound barrier piloting the fabled X-1.
Sam Shepard (as Yeager), Ed Harris, Dennis Quaid, Barbara Hershey, Fred Ward and others in a marvelous ensemble cast make this sweeping saga funny, touching and bracingly human. Like the movie that contains them, they embody 'The Right stuff' of exciting entertainment.
First outing for this commercial flop, I found some great moments of tension & excitement within this space race biopic, and a reasonable factual account of the Mercury project. As heroic pilot after pilot try to break the air speed and space records, good characterisation techniques are employed to help you understand some truly brave men, and their equally courageous families. Pretty standard Oscar stuff, overly long (3 1/4 hrs), it has all the elements to keep you watching - satire, adventure, human interest, tension and action.
Decent acting and generally impressive effects which stand the test of time (amazing cockpit shots), and a refreshing tongue-in-cheek approach to avoid the ludicrous patriotic macho BS often found in similar films, I think this is a majorly underrated film.
;D
Post by: richierich on March 04, 2009, 10:08:47 PM
(http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/5116/3133medium.jpg)
The foul-smelling "Graboids" from the original comedy-science-fiction-thriller return to snack on more people in this long-awaited sequel. The original worm hunter is called out of retirement to save Mexican oil fields from the pesky subterranean critters, but they prove to be a bit tougher this time around.
More fun with the Graboids! But after the excellent opener with Fred Ward and Kevin Bacon, this sequel is majorly disappointing with Earls sidekick unconvincing and a movie bereft of any originality until the worms start evolving (why show them on screen so often though, they lose any mystique). Don't get me wrong, it is still fairly entertaining in a silly way, the cheesy dialogue makes you smile, and the effects reminiscent of a B movie.
Made for video sequel, of mild viewing interest. :-\
Post by: richierich on March 04, 2009, 10:12:21 PM
(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/4194/2885medium.jpg)
A disaster in space pushes humankind towards World War III, and only James Bond can prevent it in this magnificent, pull-out-all-the-stops movie spectacular. Sean Connery returns as Agent 007, who travels to Japan to stop the evil SPECTRE organization and its diabolical leader, Ernst Stavro Blofeld (Donald Pleasance), from instigating global warfare from his massive headquarters in an inactive volcano.
By far the worst of the Bond films so far, and unlikely to be worsened.
The acting is sub-standard, effects in general were poor (despite huge budget), some action scenes were laughably put together, and the whole feel is of a movie squeezed out for commercial reasons only. No wonder Connery walked away at this point, possibly knowing how silly this film was, or perhaps the ridiculous ninjas, or even the straying away from Flemings books into a more scifi focus?
Disappointing Mr Bond
:-\
Post by: richierich on March 09, 2009, 04:34:03 PM
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2403/1114medium.jpg)
A genetically engineered, shape-shifting creature with extraterrestrial intelligence adopts the form of a beautiful woman to mate with humans and unleash a brood of offspring that will destroy mankind. A team of experts must band together to stop her--it--from accomplishing its diabolical mission.
Flimsy storyline and plot, goriness, gratuitious nudity - lovely! :devil:
A surprisingly renowned cast including Ben Kingsley and Michael Madsen, Species was a pleasant surprise and rises above it's essentially B-movie synopsis. Some good ideas about extraterrestrial contact and genetic engineering, albeit ending on a major bug hunt.
The film will be memorable for 2 major points, both attached to Natasha Henstridge. :drooling:
A great film to watch after the pub or just chilling with a few beers.
:D
Post by: RossRoy on March 09, 2009, 04:46:02 PM
The film will be memorable for 2 major points, both attached to Natasha Henstridge. :drooling:
I don't know exactly why, but the whole Species series has always been a guilty pleasure for me. Which makes me realise - I have none on DVD! Hmmm I should rectify that!
Post by: addicted2dvd on March 09, 2009, 04:50:56 PM
Post by: richierich on March 09, 2009, 05:01:58 PM
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/3586/1124medium.jpg)
Robert Kincaid is a romantic drifter on his way to photograph an historic covered bridge for National Geographic magazine. When he stops at a farmhouse to ask directions, he meets Francesca Johnson, whose passionate nature has long been denied. Their innocent friendship evolves into a tender, torrid and unforgettable four-day affair which they carry in their hearts for the next 24 years.
I suffered throuh the first quarter of an hour of this film feeling rather nauseous, it felt just too cosy and romantic.
By the end of the film I had a lump in the throat, and thought it was as brilliantly told and delicately handled a film as I've seen in some time.
Eastwoods direction is superb, full of precision and deft touches, he truly is masterful at times. The storyline once developed moves along like a smooth flowing stream, it gently rolls over you without ever stopping. Streep is unbelievable, I really have underrated her and this performance was outstanding. The music is so perfect, it literally pulls you inside the film and sweeps you along, with stunning cinematography accompaniment.
The only negative were the 2 irritating modern 'siblings' who told the story, but overlookable.
An intelligent, insightful film turning a difficult moral dilemna into a moving and at times tear provoking production.
HIGHLY recommended :thumbup:
Post by: richierich on March 09, 2009, 05:46:17 PM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/5292/11182medium.jpg)
Oliver Stone might have considered his film a tribute to the enduring power of the Doors' music, but he seems to have also intended it as a cautionary tale on the perils of both celebrity and substance abuse. Starring Val Kilmer as Jim Morrison, the film focuses on the Lizard King from his days as a UCLA film student in the early 1960s to his death in a Paris hotel in 1971. In the early days of the group's formation, Morrison is at his most benign; he's just a guy hanging out at the beach writing poetry. But as the Doors' fame begins to spread--with Morrison as the focus of attention--his drug consumption and erratic behavior increase exponentially. The rest of the band--Ray Manzarek (Kyle McLachalan), John Densmore (Kevin Dillon), and Robby Krieger (Frank Whaley)--begins to grow tired of his late arrivals, the increasing number of cancellations, and the drunken recording sessions requiring infinite retakes. But no one can help Morrison as he spirals downward into an inferno of drugs, alcohol, public obscenity, and depression. Kilmer gives an excellent performance, including a frighteningly accurate imitation of Morrison's singing. Stone's intimate familiarity with SoCal in the 1960s also provides the film with a high degree of surface verisimilitude.
Despite the title, this is another 60's Stone biopic of lead singer Jim Morrison, excellently played by Val Kilmer. Morrison comes across as a vain drug-addled jeckyll and hyde bufoon, and very rarely does the film highlight his poetic prowess and front man ground-breaking performances. Perhaps this was a slightly unbalanced portrayal, it is difficult to contemplate any human being taking the drug and alcohol abuse on a daily basis as is shown here.
I was amazed by Kilmers voice, it is eerily Morrison and I had to check the credits to ensure it wasn't dubbed by another performer. Meg Ryan was totally miscast as Jims wife, and fails as the weird heroin addict.
Too disjointed, badly directed, and obsesses on matters outside of the main narrative that I was soon bored watching this.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on March 09, 2009, 05:49:49 PM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/743/2887medium.jpg)
When his usual intelligence sources fail, James Bond (Agent 007) enlists the aid of crime boss Draco to track down Ernst Stavro Blofeld, head of the evil SPECTRE organization. The trail leads to the mountains of Switzerland, where Bond goes undercover in Blofeld''s hi-tech headquarters. He encounters a bevy of seductive women, but none more beautiful than Draco''s daughter, Tracy, who wins 007 over with her fervent independence, caustic wit and love of adventure. Bond pledges his eternal devotion to her, but there are more immediate concerns: Blofeld is poised to unleash horrific germ warfare weaponry that will endanger every living thing on earth. Bond''s adventures hurl him through artillery-laden ski pursuits, and a dramatic avalanche drive
Unlike a stereotypical Bond, this was very close to the book, Lazenby was a bit one-dimensional but in a film with a gritty plot, actual spy work, emotions and vulnerability, it worked ok. Perhaps Georges downfall for his future as 007 was simply he isn't hard enough, he lacks a certain edge when it comes to physicality and presence.
Kojak is not Blofeld, I much preferred Donald Pleasance in that role. Diana Rigg a passable Bond girl.
This was back to basics with Bond having to save the world with wit, charm and intelligence, and very few gadgets to assist, which is in line with Flemings original book. The music is one of the better offerings in the whole series, and the stunts and effects do not suffer overly from dating. The dark ending I thought could have been worked better, and as we know we now have the next offering with Connerys return to avenge Blofeld.
:D
Post by: richierich on March 10, 2009, 10:38:24 AM
(http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3254/108336medium.jpg)
The ultimate bag-man is back in Transporter 3! Jason Statham resumes his role as Frank Martin and he's still delivering for criminal masterminds. However, this time he's electronically tagged and his life depends on getting the package there on time!
This is a very disappointing film, it has fallen into the trap of churning out rubbish purely for commercial income and hoping the adrenaline will mask it's deficiencies. There are loads of amazing stunts and a multitude of action fighting scenes, but there is no depth, no storyline, suspense, plot, intrigue or acting. Co-star Natalya Rudakova is perhaps the most annoying person in the world, I had hoped she would be killed a lot sooner.
Totally unrealistic and implausible, give this a wide curve.
Post by: richierich on March 10, 2009, 10:51:05 AM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/8631/106620medium.jpg)
Attempting to pick up the shattered pieces of his life, a disgraced former cop (Kiefer Sutherland) takes a routine job guarding the charred ruins of a once-famous department store. But the terrifying images he see in the store's ornate mirrors will send him on a pulse-pounding mission to unravel the secrets of the building's past... before they destroy his entire life!
Tense, suspenseful, creepy, frightening, gripping, yes this film scared the crap out of me. Hardened horror genre fans may not be so impressed, but I actually felt disturbed at points, the bath scene and 'rebirth' of schizo girl in particular, and the amazing effects and apt music made this a superb film.
This for me is how a supernatural film should be, so close to reality that it makes you think it could be you, graphic death scenes, and afterwards you actually feel nervous to look in a mirror. A skeptic might say this is rather an overtold storyline and shallow plot (Pete - PLEASE buy this as I want you to review it), but for a horror novice such as me it was great entertainment, and I highly recommend it as a purchase.
A slightly too obvious twist in the tale leaves you with plenty of reflection.
:thumbup:
Post by: Najemikon on March 10, 2009, 08:18:59 PM
Transporter 3
(http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/3254/108336medium.jpg)
The ultimate bag-man is back in Transporter 3! Jason Statham resumes his role as Frank Martin and he's still delivering for criminal masterminds. However, this time he's electronically tagged and his life depends on getting the package there on time!
This is a very disappointing film, it has fallen into the trap of churning out rubbish purely for commercial income and hoping the adrenaline will mask it's deficiencies. There are loads of amazing stunts and a multitude of action fighting scenes, but there is no depth, no storyline, suspense, plot, intrigue or acting. Co-star Natalya Rudakova is perhaps the most annoying person in the world, I had hoped she would be killed a lot sooner.
Totally unrealistic and implausible, give this a wide curve.
hmmm... what do you think of 1 & 2 though?
Looking forward to your review of Mirrors as I didn't like the original and wonder if they've given the similar story a bit of oomph!
Post by: richierich on March 12, 2009, 04:04:34 PM
hmmm... what do you think of 1 & 2 though?
Looking forward to your review of Mirrors as I didn't like the original and wonder if they've given the similar story a bit of oomph!
i loved 1, 2 was ok.
Mirrors review below, please buy it so i can discuss with someone!
Post by: richierich on March 12, 2009, 04:16:25 PM
(http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1593/113714medium.jpg)
The Kearns were a typical 1960s Detroit family, trying to live their version of the American Dream. Local university professor Bob married teacher Phyllis and, by their mid-30s, had six kids who brought them a hectic but satisfying Midwestern existence. When Bob invents a device that would eventually be used by every car in the world, the Kearns think they have struck gold. But their aspirations are dashed after the auto giants who embraced Bob's creation unceremoniously shunned the man who invented it. Ignored, threatened and then buried in years of litigation, Bob is haunted by what was done to his family and their future. He becomes a man obsessed with justice and the conviction that his life's work--or for that matter, anyone's work--be acknowledged by those who stood to benefit. And while paying the toll for refusing to compromise his dignity, this everyday David will try the unthinkable: to bring Goliath to his knees.
A film regarding an inventors fight to prove he had created the worlds first intermittent windscreen wiper does not sound the most exciting idea, and so it proved. Clearly the film is concerned more with the fight Bob had with Ford to prove his patents were valid, and the effect such a lengthy legal battle had on both himself and his family.
Greg Kinnear comes out of the film with credit, at times he holds together a tired script and ponderous pacing. This is not the worst film you can invest in, but I would best describe it as a good made for TV film.
:-\
Post by: richierich on March 12, 2009, 04:23:30 PM
(http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/521/3042medium.jpg)
Superspy James Bond (Sean Connery) gets tangled up in the wild world of international diamond smuggling. But hold on--the mission is not quite so simple as it seems; his chase of the jewel thieves leads him to conspirators with plans for unleashing a nuclear armageddon on an unsuspecting planet. The majority of the action takes place on the gaudy, glittering streets of Las Vegas, as Bond negotiates the grotesque terrain with his customary aplomb and fancy mechanical gadgets. As always, he manages to dally with several sexy bombshells along the way, including the wonderful Lana Wood as Plenty O'Toole. Connery is as suave and entertaining as ever, taking on the menacing Charles Gray, who is trying his hand at playing Bond's archenemy, Blofeld. Look for the car chase down a narrow alley.
One of the weaker Bonds, ending up with such scenes as farcical moon buggy chases. Connery should have stayed in 007 retirement, but big bucks apparently lured him back. The car chases were badly edited, and the special effects seem to have gone backwards from earlier films.
On the positive, I thought the gay assassin team was a riot, the Vegas scenes generally worked ok, and some of the one-liners went down well.
Clumsy effort overall and disappointing
:-\
Post by: richierich on March 13, 2009, 10:42:40 AM
(http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/5450/1822medium.jpg)
Ace Ventura - Pet Detective is the best there is. In fact he's the only one there is. He finds himself on the case of a lifetime when he is asked to find a kidnapped dolphin, the mascot of the Miami Dolphins Football Team.
Jim Carrey - not funny.
He is amusing for about 20 seconds, a bit like someone doing a loud fart. But in the same way, if they keep farting, it becomes tiresome and unpleasant, similar to Jim Carrey.
So Courteney Cox is going to go to bed with a plonker like him in front of a barnyard of animals - yeah right!
Ridiculous story and unless you were an 8 year old boy I am not sure how you could enjoy this?? (star trek impersonations were good though)
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on March 14, 2009, 05:14:48 PM
(http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/32/51736medium.jpg)
Some guys will do anything for a little something - What happens when a planned night of love turns into the double date from hell? A provocative comedy about two couples grappling with the difference between love and lust, 'BOOTY CALL' tells the outrageous adventures of Bunz (Jamie Foxx), and Rushon (Tommy Davidson), two friends hoping to "get it on" with their beautiful dates. But Nikki (Tamala Jones) and Lysterine (Viveca A. Fox) are women with more than one definition of 'safe sex', and getting them into bed is going to be more complicated than Rushon and Bunz imagined...
There are a million reasons to hate this film - non-existent storyline, pathetic scenarios, Foxx totally wasted, vulgarity, hopeless production etc etc etc
However, there are a lot of absolute belly laugh moments, some cringeworthy embarassing scenarios, and a hilarious dog, which made this short film a guilty pleasure to watch. :D
Post by: richierich on March 14, 2009, 05:26:30 PM
(http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8866/39197medium.jpg)
If you're in the market for what The Detroit News called "a lively comic adventure," Clerks delivers with wholesale hilarity! It's one wild day in the life of a pair of overworked counter-jockeys whose razor-sharp wit and on-the-job antics give a whole new meaning to customer service! Even while braving a nonstop parade of unpredictable shoppers, the clerks manage to play hockey on the roof, visit a funeral home, and straighten out their offbeat love lives. The boss is nowhere in sight, so you can bet anything can - and will - happen when these guys are left to run the store!
Original absurd college humour comedy, quite an interest viewing of what has become cultish.
At times warmly charming, at others bitingly offensive, but always very funny and watchable.
Infamously low budget, and shot in black & white, this movie is not recommended for the sensitive!
:D
Post by: richierich on March 16, 2009, 03:14:34 PM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/4905/107746medium.jpg)
Waging his one-man war on the world of organized crime, ruthless vigilante-hero Frank Castle sets his sights on overeager mob boss Billy Russoti. After Russoti is left horribly disfigured by Castle, he sets out for vengeance under his new alias--Jigsaw. With the "Punisher Task Force" hot on his trail and the FBI unable to take Jigsaw in, Frank must stand up to the formidable army that Jigsaw has recruited before more of his evil deeds go unpunished.
Full of very graphic fighting and death scenes, as vivid as I can remember on any mainstream film, Ray Stephenson from Rome fame stars in this sequel. It is full of action, stunts, shocks, pumping music and brutal imagery.
Not for the faint-hearted, this movie has very little storyline, zero suspense or intrigue. It is purely a hunt em and kill em action flick, with an actor 10 years too old for the role.
:-\
Post by: richierich on March 16, 2009, 03:27:14 PM
(http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7894/3190medium.jpg)
A brilliant and hilarious documentary-style satire of a has-been British heavy metal band who never really was on an absurd American comeback tour that never quite gets off the ground, THIS IS SPINAL TAP practically birthed the mockumentary style. Michael McKean, Christopher Guest, and Harry Shearer are David St. Hubbins, Nigel Tufnel, and Derek Smalls, respectively--three clueless, self-absorbed men who form the nucleus of Spinal Tap, aging purveyors of overwrought songs with titles such as "Big Bottom," "Smell the Glove," and "Sex Farm." Shot in faux cinema verite-style with director Rob Reiner as fictional filmmaker Marty DiBergi, the film lampoons just about every rock & roll cliche (not to mention every rockumentary cliche) in the book as it follows these fallen rock idols from one disastrous gig to the next. Scenes of the tour's descent from desperation into total collapse are interspersed with interviews in which the band members delightfully prattle on inanely about the none-too-illustrious history and dubious vision of Spinal Tap. THIS IS SPINAL TAP is a striking and acutely hysterical directorial debut for Reiner and a deserved cult classic. Watch for an endless array of cameos by wonderful comic character actors along the way.
A film for geeks, headbangers, nerds or students (Just about upset enough of the population there :devil:)
As possibly one of the first and most infamous mockumentaries I can fully respect this film, hence why it is a must for my collection. But I do not really enjoy it, especially now over 20 years later from it's original showing. The humour is just not my taste, the characters a bit too spoofed. There are many great moments, the stonehenge setpiece is brilliant, and the music and especially the lyrics are superb.
It is not for me, but i can understand why it is hilarious for others and has become such a cult classic.
:D
Post by: richierich on March 16, 2009, 03:32:58 PM
(http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/9977/3043medium.jpg)
Roger Moore makes his first appearance as "Bond...James Bond" in 1973's Live and Let Die. Bond is dispatched to the States to stem the activities of Mr. Big (Yaphet Kotto), who plans to take over the Western Hemisphere by converting everyone into heroin addicts. The woman in the case is Solitaire (Jane Seymour in her movie debut), an enigmatic interpreter of tarot cards. The obligatory destructive-chase sequence occurs at the film's midpoint, with Bond being chased in a motorboat by Mr. Big's henchmen, slashing his way through the marshlands and smashing up a wedding party. Clifton James makes the first of several Bond appearances as redneck sheriff Pepper, while Geoffrey Holder is an enthusiastic secondary villain. The title song, written by Paul McCartney and Linda McCartney, provides the frosting on this 007 confection
Top notch film, a young Roger Moore plays Bond as more of a dirty dog, bedding a multitude of women, suave, sophisticated and full of witty one-liners. His apprenticeship as Simon Templar helped carve his character, and it was a breath of fresh air following the last 2 007 movies.
So many memorable scenes and aspects in one movie, alligator hopping, speedboat chase, voodoo ceremony, Louisiana sherriff who is a riot, a curvy Jane Seymour, the train fight with claw handed man.
Connery would do Moore in a scrap, and that is the only negative I have with the eyebrow aching Moore taking the role - he isn't quite hard enough.
But for a film, it is one of my favourite 007 releases despite its straying from Flemings book in so many ways.
;D
Post by: Najemikon on March 16, 2009, 07:31:36 PM
This is Spinal Tap
...the characters a bit too spoofed.
Have you heard about the Anvil documentary? Apparently they are very Spinal Tap-ish, except... it's real.
Post by: richierich on March 17, 2009, 10:57:32 AM
(http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/8946/54181medium.jpg)
A wacky brain surgeon, married to a beautiful but coldhearted woman, falls in love with the brain of another lady who has everything he wants... except a body!
Typical zany Steve Martin film, he became rather typecast at this stage of his career, and this is one of his less prestigious attempts. The storyline is ridiculous of course, the filming style and music very late 70's early 80's in style, which dates it considerably. The direction keeps it just on the right side of silly, so it is watchable.
Kathleen Turner is a leading lady I would typically not rate, but I was surprised watching this movie that 20 years ago she was an absolutely stunning voluptious woman, and perfect for the role as the scheming P.T. temptress.
Put your brain to one side and just enjoy the slapstick and whackiness of thisd film to enjoy.
:D
Post by: richierich on March 18, 2009, 10:22:41 AM
(http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/9969/80001medium.jpg)
Inspired by a true story, Chris Gardner (Will Smith) is a bright and talented, but marginally employed salesman. Struggling to make ends meet, Gardner finds himself and his five year old son evicted from their San Francisco apartment with nowhere to go. When Gardner lands an internship at a prestigious stock brokerage firm, he and his son endure many hardships, including being homeless and living in shelters, in pursuit of his dream of a better life for the two of them.
Feel good tale of a man determined to succeed and provide a better life for him and his son, gritty portrayal of sheer perseverence.
Will Smith is admirable in his role, but his son in real-life Jaden outshines him and looks like a future star unless Hollywood ruins another promising child actor. The interplay between them is clearly natural and never forced, and helps the movie tick along at a good pace.
As a viewer you can relate to the various trials and tribulations that Gardner faced, and how he overcomes adversity to obtain his 'happyness'.
A cynic might question why a man dragged his young son through homeless shelters and sleeping in toilets, when he could have taken a normal job and put a roof over his head.
But aside from this I found it an enjoyable movie, perhaps a must see, heart-warming and emotional.
;D
Post by: richierich on March 18, 2009, 10:38:24 AM
(http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/2235/1171medium.jpg)
The clumsy ape man from Jay Ward's 1967 television cartoon takes on a jungle of another kind in live-action when he follows a visiting San Francisco resident back to the City by the Bay. There aren't as many trees, but he somehow manages to find plenty of other things to crash into--not the least of which are modern society's social norms.
Tarzan send-up, slightly charming, but on the whole pretty silly and irrelevant. it is too slapstick and unintelligent even I would have thought for very young kids, but as an adult it is a pointless viewing. The elephant 'puppy' though was very funny.
Fraser has improved since this outing - fortunately!
Post by: richierich on March 18, 2009, 10:41:50 AM
(http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/5639/14879medium.jpg)
Clint Eastwood stars as the title character in this low-key, moderately politicised variation of his spaghetti westerns. In New Mexico in the late 1890s, the fiery Louis Chama (John Saxon) leads a group of Mexican-American peasants in a fight for their land after the evidence of their ownership has been destroyed in a questionable courthouse fire. The wealthy Frank Harlan (Robert Duvall), who also lays claim to the disputed land, has decided to bypass the legal system and hires a group of killers to take care of Chama. Kidd, who initially rejects Harlan's offer to join his hunting party, changes his mind when he finds that Chama has stolen some of his horses and brutalized one of his ranch hands. However, after seeing Harlan randomly pick off some Mexicans and becoming interested in Helen Sanchez (Stella Garcia), Kidd begins to think twice about his current employer.
Mis-firing Western with little to excite or interest.
The storyline is fairly woeful, plodding along at a snails pace, and given the names involved both in front of and behind the camera it's a waste.
Unless you are completing an Eastwood collection or have an hour and a half to waste, I'd pass this one by.
:-\
Post by: richierich on March 18, 2009, 09:03:00 PM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/484/2484medium.jpg)
The Flesh Pirates rule the barbaric world and have no regard for the human inhabitants. Our Hero comes across a man and woman fleeing from the Pirates. The girl manages to escape and tells him that she is a Cyborg carrying information which could mean the end of the plague. The Pirates recapture the girl, leaving it to our Hero to rescue her...
Shallow offering that really hasn't dated well, I remember enjoying this a lot more 20 years or so ago.
Low budget with badly choreographed fight scenes, the dialogue is non-existent and the plot full of holes.
Give me Terminator, Mad Max or Escape from NY anyday!
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on March 18, 2009, 09:19:03 PM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/9872/934413m.jpg)
After suffering a career-ending injury, a former college football star aligns himself with one of the most reknown bookies in the sports-gambling business. Abrams takes on Lang as his protege, moving him to Manhattan and allowing him to grow used to the lavish lifestyle. But, the seemingly perfect father/son relationship gradually unravels as Lang loses his touch and Abrams seeks too much control...
Typecasted Pacino as the blustering, loud and brash boss, in this above average drama with sterling cast. The chemistry between the 2 leads was good, and Rene Russo again shines, the only major negative of the movie was a fairly uninspiring storyline.
The characterisation of the major roles makes the film an interesting insight and keeps you watching, and you find yourself caring more about what is happening to them than to which betting tips are bearing fruit.
An excellent alternative to Jerry Maguire
:D
Post by: richierich on March 19, 2009, 10:37:48 AM
(http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/2433/1738medium.jpg)
The first film from John Carpenter is a hilarious romp in a not-so-glamourous spaceship into the outer reaches of space. A team of astronauts manning the beat-up spaceship Dark Star are on a mission across the universe to seek out and destroy unstable planets. The journey is wrought with mishaps and danger seems to come from the most unexpected places. There are misbehaving pet aliens, suicidal bombs that see no reason to live and want to blow themselves up, frozen crewmates dispensing advice from beyond the grave and a surly, unhelpful main computer that holds the men it serves in total contempt. Despite all these problems, the crew is still bored to the brink of madness. Co-written by Dan O'Bannon, who would go on to write the script for ALIEN, the film is brimming with jabs at the science fiction genre. John Carpenter cut his directing teeth on this film, which he also co-wrote. Made while Carpenter was a college student and produced for very little money, DARK STAR is considered to be the most successful student film ever made.
Not a lot to add to this infamous cult film. Visual feast it is not, oscar inspired performances forget it, cinematography amateurish.
But what it does have is an intelligent, witty and wholesome script which if you can overcome the 70's dialogue and mannerisms is very watchable.
The philosophising with the bomb was brilliant, and the beach ball alien hilarious.
Despite the movie probably being more of a favourite for sci-fi fans, student hippies or 70's nostalgia freaks, this is still agreeable to the average Joe in the street.
:D
Post by: Najemikon on March 19, 2009, 02:13:09 PM
Post by: richierich on March 19, 2009, 10:24:34 PM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6143/2014medium.jpg)
Thoroughly charming and totally hilarious day-in-the-life comedy in which co-writer Ice Cube plays the stoic Craig opposite Chris Tucker's Smokey, a brilliantly rendered hyperactive marijuana enthusiast. The two twentysomethings, Craig recently wrongly fired and Smokey terminally slacking and scamming, barely make it through one highly eventful day. Eloquent commentary on themes like community, family, friendship, and violence is seamlessly blended with lighter treatments of young romance, bathroom emergencies, nosy neighbors and much more. Casually impeccable performances by the entire cast make this film a standout.
Scattered with hilarious one-liners, plausible plot and humorous undertone, Chris Tucker steals the film with a great performance.
Leave your brain aside, and enjoy some 'in da hood' humour, and occasionally some good music!
:D
Post by: richierich on March 19, 2009, 10:32:43 PM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/8109/4551medium.jpg)
Tina Spangler is just another happy kid at fourteen. At fifteen she's pregnant and faces the choices of abortion, adoption or the lonely life of a single parent. Abandoned by her boyfriend she has only one person to turn to - her mother, a single parent herself. What starts out as a hopeless tale could re-unite this shattered family. Based on a true story.
Moralistic tale fairly well told, in the vein of a made for tv movie. Despite a low budget and average acting, it is worth giving this film a chance as it improves through a fairly emotive story and the viewing of how a teenage pregnancy not only affects the young mother, but also her family.
It has dated already, and I would recommend Juno ahead of it for more entertainment value.
:-\
Post by: richierich on March 20, 2009, 01:11:46 AM
(http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/5584/14432medium.jpg)
From the creators of the Naked Gun films, and starring the creators of the South Park series, comes a spoof of sports and business and anything else that can draw a hearty laugh. Two best friends (Trey Parker and Matt Stone) create "baseketball"--a sport that combines baseball and basketball--and when their silly idea catches on, they are thrust in the spotlight and become media darlings, much to their chagrin.
Dreadful film, who in their right mind could find anything amusing about this rubbish??
Infantile and crude, there are all misses and no hits, and I cannot find one good thing to mention about this pathetic attempt at a comedy.
I am surprised anyone who worked on this film is not shamed into disowning it.
Post by: richierich on March 20, 2009, 11:32:28 PM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/3061/1383mediumr.jpg)
Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman sparkle in Practical Magic, adapted from Alice Hoffman's bestseller and directed by Griffin Dunne (Addicted to Love). They play Sally and Gillian Owens, sisters hexed by a centuries-old curse...and coping with a witches brew of events involving a possible love match (Aidan Quinn) for one, a zombie (Goran Visnjic) for the other and a need to resume the age-old witchcraft taught by two doting Owens aunts (Stockard Channing and Dianne Wiest). Sit for a spell and enjoy!
Cheery film, with a commendable cast, this is a good old fashioned feel good movie.
Average direction and oddly chosen music is rescued by an original storyline, which continually entertains, and the quirky Sandra Bullock delivering her typically top performance.
This is not a great film, and probably only reaches 'good', but I think it can be enjoyed by a broad audience on a rainy afternoon.
:D
Post by: richierich on March 20, 2009, 11:47:30 PM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/4003/6362medium.jpg)
A story-hungry investigative reporter and a frenetic, garrulous small-time con trip down the well-worn path of comically mismatched, interracial buddies on the lam. Smelling a scoop, the reporter sets his pal up for a fall that lands him in jail--and downwind of a jailhouse plot to steal a stash of diamonds. Soon the innocent duo's on the run from the cops, the thieves, and Mobsters.
Pretty lack-lustre and unmemorable comedy, Chris Rock has the platform to highlight his quirky humour but the storyline, supporting cast and production are extremely poor.
If you like Tucker, watch this, if not you will soon tire of pointless car-chases, shootouts and crass jokes.
:yawn:
Post by: Jimmy on March 21, 2009, 03:22:52 AM
BASEketball:hysterical: Can't say that I'm surprise by your review. But this is by the same guys that make South Park... I don't think that we can hope for subtil and mature humour by those 2 guys.
But the real question is : Why you had watched and bought this? no way that you have think of liking that...
Post by: richierich on March 22, 2009, 10:37:50 PM
But the real question is : Why you had watched and bought this? no way that you have think of liking that...
Why watched = I am trawling through my collection and at least every 2nd film I view is an unwatched dvd that I've owned for years, it's a housekeeping issue ;)
Why bought = I could say that for many many dvds in my collection. I am unfortunately a collector first, movie buff 2nd, so I went through a phase for years of just buying and buying, normally trying to complete an actors available portfolio or completing sets. This was actually a gift from one of my generous benefactors (godfather)
Post by: richierich on March 22, 2009, 10:57:51 PM
(http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/8620/92484medium.jpg)
Richard Matheson's classic chiller gets its third adaptation (after THE OMEGA MAN and THE LAST MAN ON EARTH) with this film from director Francis Lawrence (CONSTANTINE). Will Smith plays Robert Neville, the last survivor in a post-apocalyptic New York, but there's still danger left on the city streets.
2nd viewing of this dvd, and my opinion has not changed greatly. After reading the excellent Matheson book which has inspired so many films, I would always feel slightly disappointed by and translated film. However it is an interesting adaptaion, and as a stand-alone film is quite good.
I thought Will Smith played the lead as the last human survivor well, capturing the slow madness of a man chatting to shop dummies and his relationship with Sam the dog. The backdrop of a ravaged New York is excellent, really creepy, with the wild animals roaming free. The lack of other characters does make the film a little bland, and I would have liked the 'other' humans brought into the story earlier.
But as Jon has previously said in his review, the mutants are a major let-down and the director appears to have gone crazy with his CGI effects to a point where at times they were like cartoons, totally unconvincing, and not scary in any way (although the initial 'hive' shot was suspenseful). The ending as well was not translated from the book, and too Hollywood nicey nicey for my taste.
Great effects though, and at times a full-on action piece that makes it a must-see for me.
:D
Post by: richierich on March 24, 2009, 10:38:50 AM
(http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/9964/126615medium.jpg)
Academy Award winner Tommy Lee Jones leads an all-star cast in this psychological thriller based on the bestselling novel by James Lee Burke.
While on an investigation into a series of grisly murders, veteran detective Dave Robicheaux (Jones) navigates his way through the Louisiana bayou and the dark, sultry world of New Orleans mobster "Baby Feet" Balboni (John Goodman). Layers of corruption and long-dead secrets reawaken grudges and a lethal alliance A tangled web of killings, past and present, converges in a shocking showdown with stakes that become deeply personal to Robicheaux and his family. Featuring music from five-time GRAMMY Award-winner Buddy Guy, this film takes you deep into Cajun country's hidden worlds.
Prepare yourself for a yawnfest, as Grandad Jones creaks out another typecast role as an ageing hard man cop from the South.
Slow, ponderous story, led by Jones who looks like he needs a zimmer frame to walk more than 20 paces, and we are meant to believe he is this tough guy who rights the wrongs? Goodman just doesn't suit the gangster role, and looks uncomfortable in every scene. There is no suspense or intrigue, little drama, the characters are shallow, the ghost is pointless, the script dull.
The cover blurb is so misleading as to probably warrant a complaint to the false advertising bureau - tangled web/shocking showdown/sultry world - I wish!!
The setting and atmosphere of Cajun country is about the only redeeeming feature in a wholly disappointing feature film. :yawn:
Post by: richierich on March 24, 2009, 10:45:55 AM
(http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/8923/1375mediumh.jpg)
Five years after he was murdered by his own colleagues in a covert government operation, Al Simmons makes a pact with the devil to be resurrected so that he may see his wife Wanda once more. In return for the favor, the devil requires, in typically Faustian fashion, that Simmons lead Hell's Army for the destruction of humankind. Blessed in life with extraordinary killing skills, Simmons is even more deadly with the backing of his new master and the changling powers he has at his disposal. As he begins to discover and exercise his new strengths, he encounters two figures who direct him to use his powers in order to serve two different agendas. Cogliostro encourages Spawn to fight the devil and become a new champion for humankind, while Clown goads Spawn into continuing to serve his new master and lead the Armageddon.
Poor storyline, acting that left a lot to be desired, a poor mans X-men or batman.
As soon as the farting blue-faced dwarf and his cheesy one-liners entered the film, I lost the will to enjoy this, and it never pulled me back in.
The effects and soundtrack were very good, but there is very little else to hype about this movie.
One to miss. :-\
Post by: richierich on March 26, 2009, 10:16:48 AM
(http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/2712/99121medium.jpg)
On a nonstop quest for justice that crisscrosses the globe, Bond meets the beautiful but feisty Camille (Olga Kurylenko), who leads him to Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a ruthless businessman and major force within the mysterious Quantum organisation. When Bond uncovers a conspiracy to take control of one of the world's most important natural resources, he must navigate a minefield of treachery, deception and murder to neutralise Quantum before it's too late!
Less memorable than Casino Royale, a little less polished than the best Bonds, villains not having such a great impact, Bond girls are great - but could be better.
In other words, this could have been improved with slight tweaks, to transform it from a good movie to a great movie.
The dark rough and ready Daniel Craig is more terminator than the saint, continuing to bring a hard edge to the familiar Bond character, as he goes renegade in an attempt to investigate the organisation that killed Vesper. Very few one-liners, gadgets a rarity, but a mature breakneck speed storyline that fully satisfies.
The action scenes are carbon copies from Bourne, and need to develop in the next Bond film to their own individuality. M has a bigger part than usual, and needless to say Dench pulls off a great performance.
This is the new Bond, grittier and current, and QOS will rank as one of the better films for me.
;D
Post by: richierich on March 26, 2009, 10:29:13 AM
(http://img49.imageshack.us/img49/5273/12280medium.jpg)
He has a firm handshake, and a ready smile, and some strange ideas about friendship. His name is Lester Long and when the bodies start piling up he generously decides to share the blame. Now the F.B.I. has got the whole town under observation, and Lester has put his new friend Clay over a Barrel. The only way for Clay to set things straight is to beat one twisted individual at his own game of deciet and double-crossing.
Enjoyable blind buy Ridley Scott produced black comedy, quadruple cross storyline that keeps you watching. Despite a slow start, this movie draws you in with it's well selected casting, and the empathy you feel for the unlucky lead character as he stumbles from one piece of bad luck to another, all leading to a satisfying conclusion.
Vince Vaughan as the murdorous cowboy steals the show, with a part seemingly made for him. Superb soundtrack and wonderful cinematography (Montana I think?), this film could never be classified as a classic, but is well recommended for something slightly quirky and different.
Reminded me of a Coen movie??
;D
Post by: richierich on March 26, 2009, 10:45:34 AM
(http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/5334/42588medium.jpg)
When a writing assignemnt lands journalist Raoul Duke (Johnny Depp) and sidekick Dr. Gonzo (Benicio Del Toro) in Las Vegas, they decide to make ot the ultimate business trip. But before long, business is forgotten and trip has become the key word.
Fueled by a suitcase full of mind-bending pharmaceuticals, Duke and Gonzo set off on a fast and furious ride through nonstop neon, surreal surroundings and a crew of the craziest characters ever (including cameo appearances by Cameron Diaz, Christina Ricci, Gary Busey and many others). But no matter where misadventure leads them, Duke and Gonzo discover that sometimes going too far is the only way to go.
You'd have to be stoned to enjoy this!
Cult book, not a cult film.
Drug fuelled road trip, this was boring to watch and most of the jokes fell flat. Perhaps it is an acquired taste, viewing 2 guys smashed out of their brains sticking 2 fingers up to society, disturbing scenes and shock for shocks sake, just doesn't fo it for me. Wasted - a good description not only of the state of the leads, but of my time spent on this trashy disappointment.
Terry Gilliam is my marmite, I either love his films, or hate them, and there is seldom any middle ground.
Both leads are convincing and I tip my hat to them for their performances, the music is worth mentioning as it is by far the best feature of the movie, the rest though I have to give a great big fart sounding rasberry.
Post by: richierich on March 26, 2009, 10:50:10 AM
(http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7193/10077medium.jpg)
Sci-fi horror filmmaker David Cronenberg's (Scanners) diabolical invader is a television show that seduces and controls its viewers. Featuring rock star Deborah Harry (in her first major film) as a kinky hostess, James Woods as a cable programmer looking for the ultimate in viewing thrills, and special make-up effects by Oscar®-winner Rick Baker (An American Werewolf in London, Star Wars). Videodrome is a pulsating science fiction nightmare about a world where video can control and alter human life.
This film was unsettling - voyeurism, torture, sex, sadism, James Woods in a strong performance, and Cronenbergs direction all gelling together into a fascinating viewing experience, albeit not the most pleasant.
Watching contestants humiliated on TV has now become a common theme today, so this film in many ways was ahead of it's time. Certainly the whole storyline of the movie is incredibly interesting, I assume it was a demonstration of the negative effect of the television on modern society, but as always with Cronenberg you are never 100% sure what you are meant to take away from one of his films?
Disturbing movie, I am not sure if this should be classified as horror, sci-fi or arthouse? definately worthy of its cult tag, I personally didn't love it, but it left a mark.
:D
Post by: Najemikon on March 26, 2009, 07:23:44 PM
farting blue-faced dwarf
On paper, it sounds like genius! :hysterical: Dreadful film. And the comic was pretty good too...
Post by: richierich on March 26, 2009, 08:27:31 PM
farting blue-faced dwarf
On paper, it sounds like genius! :hysterical: Dreadful film. And the comic was pretty good too...
One of my film gurus has advised me to try and purchase/watch the animated version of Spawn, which he claims is much better
Post by: Najemikon on March 26, 2009, 08:42:18 PM
farting blue-faced dwarf
On paper, it sounds like genius! :hysterical: Dreadful film. And the comic was pretty good too...
One of my film gurus has advised me to try and purchase/watch the animated version of Spawn, which he claims is much better
I've never seen it, but I know Todd McFarlane was heavily involved and fully endorsed it, so it has a much better chance.
And you have film gurus? My goodness, are they employed full-time and live on the grounds? :P
Post by: richierich on March 31, 2009, 11:00:03 AM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/6524/3308medium.jpg)
James Bond (Roger Moore) may have met his match in Francisco Scaramanga (Christopher Lee), a world-renowned assassin whose weapon of choice is a distinctive gold pistol. When Scaramanga seizes the priceless Solex Agitator energy converter, Agent 007 must recover the device and confront the trained killer in a heart-stopping duel to the death!
Really enjoyed watching this one again, it had been some time since my last viewing.
For me this is possibly Moores 2nd best film, I thought Lee as Scaramanga, with sidekick Nick-Nack, were excellent villains, and who could not enjoy seeing Britt Ekland wandering round in a bikini or babydoll nightie? (despite her bad acting skills)
The story is not as per Flemings last book, but I think works well and is still relevant today. Moore is particularly suave and witty, which suited the films at this time. Some of the stunts were awesome, the spiralling jump over the collapsed bridge only spoilt by a bloody penny-whistle noise (listen to the commentary track to see how much they regretted that). The gadgets are balanced well in quantity and not too ridiculous, the jokes are delivered well, the Far-Eastern locations ideal, and the acting solid in most areas.
On the negatives, the soundtrack was poor, a couple of the fight scenes were limp, and the pointless return of Clifton James as the racist 'Southern' sheriff.
A 007 classic and definately one of Moore's better films. Full of humour and an engaging storyline, I rate it higher than others. ;D
Post by: richierich on March 31, 2009, 11:15:40 AM
(http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/3248/9781848420397.jpg)
Jamal Malik, an 18 year-old orphan from the slums of Mumbai, is about to experience the biggest day of his life. With the whole nation watching, he is just one question away from winning a staggering 20-million rupees on India's "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" But when the show breaks for the night, police arrest him on suspicion of cheating; how could a street kid know so much? Desperate to prove his innocence, Jamal tells the story of his life in the slum where he and his brother grew up, of their adventures together on the road, of vicious encounters with local gangs, and of Latika, the girl he loved and lost. Each chapter of his story reveals the key to the answer to one of the game show's questions. Intrigued by Jamal's story, the jaded police inspector begins to wonder what a young man with no apparent desire for riches is really doing on this game show? When the new day dawns and Jamal returns to answer the final question, the inspector and 60 million viewers are about to find out.
Overhyped film, as typical of any Oscar lauded title, but if you reduce your expectations going into viewing this movie, it is genuinely good with an interesting and original storyline.
The first hour can be slow at times, and your finger hovers over the FFW button, but in time the story embraces you, and towards the end you become totally immersed. It is very original, I struggle to find another film to provide an analogy, although I found the portrayal of India and particularly Mumbai stereo-typed. Emotionally it pulls you in many ways, laughter, tears, pain, sorrow, anger and of course feel-good at the end. Technically it is brilliant with amazing cinematography and direction, acting across the board is top-rate, and the soundtrack is one for the ipod.
This is a must see, only you can decide if it is a must-have in your collection.
;D
Post by: richierich on March 31, 2009, 11:33:04 AM
(http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/5568/51zievneislsl500aa240.jpg)
From Gabriele Muccino, the Director of The Pursuit Of Happyness comes Seven Pounds. Will Smith stars as Ben, an IRS agent who is depressed and guilt-ridden about mistakes from his past. He sets out to make amends by helping seven strangers. When he meets Emily (Rosario Dawson), a beautiful woman with a heart condition, he falls in love with her, thereby complicating his plans. Woody Harrelson also appears as a blind pianist who befriends Ben.
Another over-hyped film, I kept waiting for the elements that apparently force you to tears - I never found them.
It is certainly sensitive and sombre, thought-provoking, and in Will Smith he demonstrates his maturing years are improving his acting abilities. It is a bit too broken up and disjointed for my taste, and at times difficult to follow with very little clues, so patience is vital to get full enjoyment.
A good film for dvd, I would have been disappointed if I'd seen this at the cinema, and i personally preferred Pursuit of Happyness.
:D
Post by: richierich on March 31, 2009, 12:40:03 PM
(http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/7821/107077medium.jpg)
From the director of The Devil Wears Prada comes a hilarious and heartwarming comedy based on the #1 New York Times best seller Marley & Me.
Jennifer Aniston and Owen Wilson unleash huge laughs as John and Jenny Grogan, a young couple contemplating the decision to start a family. Then came Marley... an adorable Labrador pup who flunks obedience school and quickly turns his new home into a disaster area. But with a heart as big as his appetite for trouble, Marley sees the Grogans through the ups and downs of life and love, and they ultimately realize that "the world's worst dog" truly brings out the best in them.
Cute loveable dog, and a labrador too. :devil:
Seriously though, this has all the ingredients of a feel-good film, funny cute dog, gorgeous warm wife (Aniston), endearing jokey husband (Wilson), superbly behaved kids, and a tender storyline that forces even the biggest cynic to smile.
Ok, its banal, hollow, dramaless, over-sentimental etc etc as per the critics slamming, you could write an essay on all the holes you can spot and all the negatives around the movie.
But take this at face value, its easy family orientated viewing, its funny in parts, the cast is good, and the storyline adequate and of a sensible length, in other words it hits it's target audience perfectly.
The book is apparently a thousand times better, but for a simple pleasant viewing with family this one will hit the mark
:D
Post by: richierich on March 31, 2009, 12:44:53 PM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6119/3309medium.jpg)
THE SPY WHO LOVED ME, the 10th film in the James Bond series, ventures not only into the depths of the ocean but into the deep topic of betrayal and morality as well, placing it among the boldest of the 007 films. James Bond (Roger Moore) is coupled with Russian agent Anya 'Triple-X' Amasova (Barbara Bach) to recover stolen Soviet submarines from evil oceanographer Carl Stromberg (Curt Jurgens) and his gigantic lackey, Jaws (Richard Kiel). When Triple-X learns that Bond killed her boyfriend on a mission in the Alps, she must overcome her selfish notions of revenge and work with 007 for the good of the world. In addition to the Bond staple of girls and gadgetry, the film features beautifully shot footage of the Austrian Alps, Venice, and the Egyptian pyramids. Furthermore, director Lewis Gilbert uses the film to push the cinematic envelope with stunning underwater action sequences, that leave the viewer gasping for air and a vodka martini--shaken, not stirred.
One of my favourite Bond films, it has all the elements that I really enjoyed in 007 when I was younger, and even watching it again over 30 years after it was made it has not diminished in my view. Beautiful women (especially Bach), superb villains, great action scenes, tongue in cheek humour, exotic locations, and a 7 foot steel toothed hitman.
The opening sequence before the titles is possibly as good as any movie I have ever seen, couple of corny jokes, Bond in bed, dramatic ski chase, followed by Bond skiing off a cliff, only to open a Union Jack parachute to safely drift down the mountainside - classic stuff.
Slick production, an amazing underwater base for Jurgens megalomaniac ambitions, this would be Moores best effort as Bond. Nobody Does it Better, and in this case I agree.
:thumbup:
Post by: Najemikon on March 31, 2009, 02:34:59 PM
Slumdog Millionaire
Overhyped film, as typical of any Oscar lauded title...
Oof! The cynicism! In the end, I don't think it was hyped enough. I was riveted from the start, in fact, when I get the must-have DVD, it may well be good enough to rip the ffw button off my control so it can't be used... ;D
Post by: richierich on March 31, 2009, 03:23:44 PM
Slumdog Millionaire
Overhyped film, as typical of any Oscar lauded title...
Oof! The cynicism! In the end, I don't think it was hyped enough. I was riveted from the start, in fact, when I get the must-have DVD, it may well be good enough to rip the ffw button off my control so it can't be used... ;D
It's a good film Jon, as per my mark which as you know is very high for me.
But come on, it took a stack of oscars and baftas on the roll, cos people think its cool and fashionable to admire this movie. If you read the book you'll see how far it has strayed to ensure it is commercially popular - do I blame them for this? - damn no - it's now a blockbuster.
It's portrayal of India was derogatory, from someone who has been to Mumbai I can assure you there are not gangs of kids waiting to fleece you, hordes of intentionally crippled kids begging, or brutal police houses from the 70's. Sure there is a lot of poverty, and there are beggars - but come to London and I'll show you similar. It's a 3rd world country with more millionaires than any other country, hence the problem (in my uneducated opinion) of an extreme have and have-not society. (shit :redcard: i talked politics - please delete my points and call me Rifter!)
Post by: Najemikon on March 31, 2009, 08:08:08 PM
I can't comment much on the book or the real place, having experienced neither. I did read a rundown of changes from the original and it seems to me to be an improvement, but that isn't fair of me. However, I will say that I did not come away with the apparent misconceptions it gets accused of. I never thought that Mumbai was one big slum with gangs of kids and still don't. I knew it was an affluent area, but it's also very big. Delve deep into the middle of that slum and I reckon you'll find far worse than Boyle depicted. It seems common sense to me that sections will be impossible to govern and local gangs will rule it.
One point hit home sharply because I happened to see it the day after Comic Relief who featured a similar one in Africa; the rubbish tip where the kids sort through for stuff to sell. There ain't nothing like that in London nor the rest of the UK! Regards the police, I agree with you there. The film would still have worked if that was toned right down.
What I did pick up on was that the people in the slum were varied, intelligent and for the most part, getting on with life and grasping opportunities. I think that's important, because while such areas need support, they shouldn't be stereotyped. I know that's what you said it did, but I felt the opposite. I also came away with a strong sense of what you called the "have and have-not". Surely it's a successful film if someone such as I got that without knowing anything about Mumbai before?
Post by: Achim on April 02, 2009, 04:56:42 PM
I clearly have to agree with Jon. It's a well directed film. In some scenes the music and the images complimented each other beautifully. The editing was great and especially the "final question" scene was very gripping; unfortunately it's a bit anti-climactic if you know the answer to the rather trivial question... There was a bit when I felt the threads were dropped, but only to be picked up again fairly soon (the bit between Jamal loosing contact until the part where he explains how he got on the show, although I didn't really get that bit).
I actually had Rich's comment in mind when watching the film, pointing out that the reality isn't as bad as portrayed. But, I found the things shown more believable if set in a country like India rather than the UK and personally didn't have the feeling they tried to say it's like that everywhere... I imagine these things might exist (there is stuff going on in this world we can barely begin to imagine) and this film is about the love story of two of these poor kids.
A clear
from me.The scene that happens during the end credits is really fun! :yu:
Post by: richierich on April 02, 2009, 06:07:11 PM
A clear
And me ;D
The scene that happens during the end credits is really fun! :yu:
The dancing?? - if so I agree very good and catchy tune :egyptian:
Post by: Achim on April 03, 2009, 06:22:34 AM
The dancing?? - if so I agree very good and catchy tune :egyptian:Um, yeah, In a weird and twisted way I considered it a spoiler so didn't want to mention it clearly; nice tribute to Indian cinema.
Post by: Jimmy on April 03, 2009, 06:33:25 AM
Post by: richierich on April 05, 2009, 12:04:11 AM
(http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/6647/17896medium.jpg)
Seventeen year-old Jones (Elijah Wood) has decided to avoid college in favour of renting an apartment, and attempting to learn from life while trying to become a writer. As he tries to gain his mother's (Elizabeth Perkins) approval and figure out his father's whereabouts, he becomes involved with both Lisa (Mandy Moore), a struggling actress, and Jane (Franka Potente), an older photographer. When Jane is involved in a car accident, and an ex-boyfriend comes to take care of her, Jones realises how strong his feelings are for her. He then enlists his strange neighbour, Brad (Aaron Pearl), to help win Jane's love. Look out for a cameo by Deborah Harry as Ma Mabley, an over-sexed seller of beds.
Well written and enjoyable tale, an easy watch that keeps you smiling most of the way through.
Nothing outstanding, acting is fine, the quirky storyline gently pulls you through, with the bonus of Debbie Harry as a busty and horny shopkeeper.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 05, 2009, 12:18:08 AM
(http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/9830/2231medium.jpg)
Jobe, the church gardener known as the Lawnmower Man, is an adult with a six-year-old's mind. At Cybertech, a nearby research centre, Dr Angelo uses his technological breakthrough, an advanced virtual reality computer system, to accelerate the intelligence of laboratory chimps. Ater a chance meeting with Jobe, Dr Angelo begins experiments to advance Jobe's intelligence... with amazing and disturbing results. Based on a short story by Stephen King.
Amazing effects for an early 90's film, Fahey is excellent as the dim-witted Jobe, and Brosnan works his role well as the scientist. The virtual reality opportunities are well exploited, right through to the cybersex scene. If only they could recut the original intelligent chimp on the rampage scene, I would mark it higher.
Daft sci-fi meets frankenstein storyline, albeit watchable, the pace is good but unfortunately predictable. A good afternoons viewing with little brainpower or emotion needed.
:)
Post by: richierich on April 05, 2009, 12:24:34 AM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/2675/18826medium.jpg)
Fifteen-year-old Prep student Oscar Grubman (Aaron Stanford) feels that girls his own age haven't lived enough, which is why he's coming home to Manhattan's Upper East Side for Thanksgiving to profess his love to his stepmother, Eve (Sigourney Weaver)--whose marriage to his professor father (John Ritter) has become routine and uninspiring. Unable to find the right moment to express himself, Oscar slips out to a bar after dinner and finds himself drunk and missing his wallet. Walking home, he bumps into Eve's best friend, Diane (Bebe Neuwirth), a sexy chiropractor who offers to take him home to detox. A backrub leads to a kiss, which results in Oscar and Diane spending the night together. Oscar, feeling he has betrayed his true love, must now prevent Diane--who laughs at the whole situation--from telling Eve what has happened between them.
Disjointed tale with low-budget digital production values, it is too far a stretch of the imagination to assume so many beautiful middle aged women would fall for a nerdy pretentious academic 15 year old. There are some elements of quite good wry humour, but it is lost in what can best be described as a boring immature Graduate clone.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on April 06, 2009, 10:17:22 AM
(http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/792/190769.jpg)
On April 19, 1989, an explosion during training exercises in Gun Turret number two of the U.S.S. Iowa, a storied battleship, created more than one firestorm; Besides the one that killed more than 40 sailors, a scandal swept the nation that put ... Full Descriptionthe U.S. Navy on the defensive. The Navy, in what some suspected was an attempt to cover up unauthorized artillery experiments by enlisted men, accused one of the dead men of being a suicidal homosexual and setting off the explosion in a fit of jealous rage. Idealistic Lieutenant Dan Meyer (Robert Sean Leonard), a witness to the tragedy, whose father was an honored military man, must square off with the ship's longtime, but remote captain, Fred Moosally (James Caan), when testifying during the heated and nationally televised investigation by the Pentagon.
Reasonably well told adaptation of a true event, this was a pleasant surprise from a blind buy. The acting is solid throughout, for a change Caan is watchable, and Robert Sean Leonard (Wilson in House MD) gives a convincing performance as the whistle blowing Lieutenant. It sticks very close to the facts, so at times it did plod along with predictability and mediocraty, but for me the political edge was an interesting accompiniment.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 06, 2009, 10:21:02 AM
(http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/6516/41288medium.jpg)
Chris Kody, the world's best mercenary, is freed from prison -- but there's a catch. Kody must use his lethal weapons and fighting skills to stop a group of terrorists who have taken over a nuclear sub.
Ageing Seagull, dishes out another tedious flick with the guise of an action movie. Overweight, over-rated and over the hill. Very little action on the diesel sub, and not a terrorist in sight, instead they are mind controlled soldiers, so my cover blurb is totally wrong.
Vinnie does his best to add a bit of humour to proceedings, but he is as bad an actor as he was a footballer. This dvd would best be left sunk at the bottom of the ocean.
Under siege wannabe - go enjoy your retirement Steven! :yawn:
Post by: richierich on April 09, 2009, 03:11:51 PM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2271/107580medium.jpg)
Epic action and mind-blowing effects rock the planet in this thrilling reinvention of the sci-fi classic, THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL. Keanu Reeves portrays Klaatu, an otherworldly being whose arrival on Earth triggers an unstoppable series of events that threaten all of mankind. In a desperate attempt to save humanity, governments and scientists race to unravel the mystery behind the visitor’s appearance. When a woman (Jennifer Connelly) and her young stepson find themselves embroiled in the alien’s plan, they become the world’s only hope to stave off apocalyptic annihilation.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda - why isn't this better?
What an opportunity, great ahead of its time original film some 50 years ago, huge budget, some amazing CGI special effects, highly paid cast - but somewhere along the line it became satisfied at being an average film, when it might have been a great sci-fi epic. From the superb originals backdrop of the cold war, emphasis is now on the issue of global warming.
Reeves never appears emotionally attached to this film (as opposed to Matrix), Jennifer Connolly is shocking, the storyline clumsy with a truly hopeless ending. Too much 'America is the only nation' message, very little thought-provoking state of our worlds health questions. The pace was ok, the film fortunately went quite quickly, and the effects at times a saviour.
However overall you will be disappointed by this remake, save your money and rewatch the original! This is Hollywood cashing-in.
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 09, 2009, 03:18:33 PM
(http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9338/105525medium.jpg)
Funnyman Adam Sandler stars in Walt Disney Pictures' Bedtime Stories, the magical family comedy that's packed with adventure and lots of heart. When Skeeter Bronson (Sandler) babysits his sister's (Courteney Cox) children, his imagination runs wild as he dreams up elaborate bedtime stories - always casting himself as the hero. Entranced, the children add their own ideas to these once-upon-a-time tales of heroics and chivalry. Then...magic happens. These nighttime fantasies become Skeeter's daytime realities, leading him on a real-life adventure in search of his own happy ending. Filled with colorful characters, humor and whimsy, this heartwarming comedy will enchant your entire family again and again.
Lame, vomit inducing swill that is being churned out by the Sandler bowels at an alarming rate!
Totally unfunny, devoid of any recognisable comedy, charmless, bland, non-existent storyline, and a complete waste of time and money - for any age group.
Walt would have turned in his grave...
Post by: richierich on April 09, 2009, 04:06:49 PM
(http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/1682/113779medium.jpg)
Carl Allen has stumbled across a way to shake free of post-divorce blues and a dead-end job: embrace life and say yes to everything. Take a bungee plunge? Yes. Accept call-now TV offers? Yes. Learn Korean? Yes. Grab the first flight to anywhere? Yes. Win your dream girl? Yes. Crack up fans with a feel-good, laugh-loaded romp? Yes! Working every funny bone in his nimble body and every muscle in his hilariously mobile face, Jim Carrey plays Carl in a YEScapade about opening up to life's possibilities - especially when those possibilities include romance with an intriguing, free-spirited musician (Zooey deschanel). From the director of Bring It On and The Break-Up comes an invitation to discover the comedy power of yes.
I'm on a bad run, another churned out bunch of twaddle from Hollywood. After hearing such great reviews of the book, it is a shame they picked an unsuitable lead, and strayed so far from the book.
Uninspiring, over-rated, mildly comedic in small sections, this is an ok film to pass a couple of hours on a rainy afternoon.
Wait for this to hit the bargain bins.
:-\
Post by: Najemikon on April 09, 2009, 07:24:01 PM
Under siege wannabe - go enjoy your retirement Steven! :yawn:
He should sign up to Stallone's Expendables! There's a very Seagal shaped hole in that cast...
Post by: Jimmy on April 10, 2009, 01:52:31 AM
Reeves never appears emotionally attached to this filmAre you really surprise? Keenu Reeves and emotions are 2 notions that are complete opposite. How they could have thought that he was able to replace Michael Rennie? :shrug:
Post by: Najemikon on April 10, 2009, 12:14:37 PM
Reeves never appears emotionally attached to this filmAre you really surprise? Keenu Reeves and emotions are 2 notions that are complete opposite. How they could have thought that he was able to replace Michael Rennie? :shrug:
Actually I think he could have been good. I'd read that he was playing him as an alien within a human form, and was therefore awkward and unsure; like driving an unusual car for the first time! But the writing has to support it and apparently the whole thing was a pile of poo so Keanu's range becomes another negative, not a positive. And he can be good. He's a movie star, not an actor, and in the right roles, he's perfect.
Post by: Jimmy on April 10, 2009, 06:39:21 PM
He's a movie star, not an actor, and in the right roles, he's perfect.In what? The last time he was perfect was a long time ago :laugh:
Post by: DJ Doena on April 10, 2009, 06:44:02 PM
Post by: Najemikon on April 10, 2009, 07:06:24 PM
I like him in Bill & Ted, Speed, Matrix and Constantine
Some films have a Keanu Reeves shaped hole in them and simply wouldn't work without that unique emotion range (that should be "emotional range", but in this case, the singular is accurate! :laugh:). Point Break was another. Bram Stoker's Dracula wasn't. Neither was that Johnny Watsit or Chain Reaction.
Post by: richierich on April 14, 2009, 10:41:18 AM
(http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/6408/27389medium.jpg)
Overnight, Jimmy Connelly (Orlando Bloom – Troy, Pirates of the Caribbean, Lord of the Rings) has become a sex symbol in his neighbourhood, and Britain’s boxing hope. And he’s not quite sure what to do with the extra attention! Jimmy’s a milkman, you see, and he loves it. But when one day, at his local gym, he accidentally puts Britain’s contender for the boxing world title out of action, he is propelled from amateur boxer onto the world stage and set to fight against the current world champion. He’s going to have to shape up! And he’s going to need all the help he can get. A lot of it too. Orlando Bloom is hilarious in this quirky comedy that will make you laugh out loud.
It is difficult not to like this quirky easy-going film. It isn't tremendous by any stretch of the imagination, but it is engaging and good fun, and a pleasant storyline that rambles on in good humour. Bloom is clearly uncomfortable in the role, but does make efforts to convince, and the South London settings make a good backdrop.
A very short film, so a good watch after the pub.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 14, 2009, 03:59:06 PM
(http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/765/94270medium.jpg)
Scott stars as John Farley, a self-help author who returns to his hometown only to discover that his mother (Sarandon) has fallen in love with his old high school nemesis, Mr. Woodcock (Thornton) - the gruff, no-nonsense gym teacher who had put him through years of mental and physical humiliation.
Boring rehash of a common theme, fairly unoffensive but wastes a couple of decent actors here in the case of Thornton and Saranden. More laugh an hour than laugh a minute, although several noteworthy cringeworthy moments included.
Poorly written, unenthusiastically acted, and misleading from the trailer (If you watch the trailer that is actually the sum total of funny moments from the whole film!!)
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on April 14, 2009, 04:10:20 PM
(http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/7039/feverpitch.jpg)
Lindsey (Drew Barrymore) is an ambitious business consultant, approaching "twenty-ten", whose spirit is as luminous as her beauty. High-school teacher Ben (Jimmy Fallon) is a good catch. He's charming, funny and great with kids, but has a small income. Sure, they have their differences. She's a workaholic; he loves his summers off, but when they first meet, and despite their differences, their attraction is immediate and true love overcomes all. Everything is wonderful, and Ben seems to be the man of her dreams, until Lindsey discovers what a 23 year long obsession with his favorite team really means. Together they must decide if they will strike out or fight to keep love alive
Marketed in the UK as 'The Perfect Catch', this chick flick written by Nick Hornby will appeal to most viewers. An easy going romantic comedy that won't offend anybody, with enough laughs to keep you entertained. Fallon and Barrymore (I like her in a lot of roles) are convincing in their parts and the switch from the original football to (the boring) baseball is handled smoothly. This isn't quite as good as his High Fidelity or About a Boy, but it is still an impressive Hornby storyline. I will watch the original later this week which starred Colin Firth, and judge between the two.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 14, 2009, 05:05:09 PM
(http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/856/3425mediumh.jpg)
Agent 007 blasts into orbit in this action-packed adventure that takes him to Venice, Rio de Janeiro and outer space. When Bond investigates the hijacking of an American space shuttle, he and beautiful CIA agent Holly Goodhead are soon locked in a life-or-death struggle against Hugo Drax, a power-mad industrialist whose horrific scheme may destroy all human life on earth!
Clumsy special effects, disappointing storyline, and Moore possibly his worst as Bond. Drax (Lonsdale) was not a good villain in my opinion, but the return of Jaws (and speaking!) was a highlight.
The settings were pretty spectacular all round, Venice and Brazil standing out, but must of eaten in to the huge budget considerably. There are action spectaculars within the film, the girls of course are beautiful (how do they get away with calling one Holly Goodhead??) especially gorgeous was Corinne Clery, and the opening halo descent was amazing.
But it is all a bit too tongue in cheek - Star Wars in mind - tick the boxes - for my liking, so I would only go as far as saying this 007 was just above average.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 14, 2009, 05:13:22 PM
(http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/9341/4502medium.jpg)
The best known of Hitchcock's British films, this civilized spy yarn follows the escapades of Richard Hannay (Robert Donat), who stumbles into a conspiracy that involves him in a hectic chase across the Scottish moors—a chase in which he is both the pursuer and the pursued. Adapted from John Buchan's novel, this classic Hitchcock "wrong man" thriller encapsulates themes that anticipate the director's biggest American films (especially North by Northwest), and is a standout among his early works.
Fairly uncomplex Hitchcock thriller in comparison to later efforts, this has all the ingredients of action, dark comedy and suspense to make it work. It is clearly filmed too much within a studio, and you would be disappointed having read the book to see how far this strays from the original storyline, but the interesting camera angles, lighting, lead acting and direction keep this films head above water.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 15, 2009, 10:14:35 AM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/7392/74813medium.jpg)
Jack Black is more hilarious than ever as Ignacio, a monastery cook who feeds orphan childeren by day and by night transforms himself into Nacho Libre, a notorious Luchador in strechy pants. Spurred on by Esqueleto "The Skeleton" a street peasant turned sidekick, Nacho challenges Mexico's most fearsome wrestlers as he fights to save the childeren and win the affections of sister Encarnación, his inspiration and forbidden love. From the creators of Napoleon Dynamite and the writers of School of Rock, Nacho Libre packs "big laughs from start to finish".
Dreadful film. I had hoped for a School of Rock style performance and script given it starred Jack Black and had the same writers, alas it never got anywhere near it. The writing is devoid of any comedy, I can honestly say I never laughed once, not even a titter. They end up resorting to fart noises to try and raise a smile, but that can't help such a disaster. This is a major flop, please avoid.
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on April 15, 2009, 10:18:04 AM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/5354/26157medium.jpg)
When his friend and co-worker suddenly dies, train enthusiast Finbar McBride (Peter Dinklage) inherits an abandoned railway station in rural New Jersey. A dwarf who avoids social contact whenever possible, Fin treks out to the property and moves in. However, his newly isolated life is disrupted by the arrival of the well meaning Joe and Olivia. Joe (Bobby Cannavale), is an outgoing operator of a roadside refreshment stand, and Olivia (Patricia Clarkson), is a reclusive artist who is grieving the loss of her son. As Joe and Olivia slowly bring Fin out of his shell, all three people are affected by their newfound friendships.
Charming film exploring the characters and relationships of 3 differing personalities. The film is a blend of humour, quirkiness, disappointment, sadness and in the end heart warming interaction. It is intentionally slow paced, a beautifully written simple story, directed with craftmanship, the actors excel, and the film washes over you like warm honey.
Don't expect action or suspense, but if you want to delve into a portrait of humanity and characterisation, then give this a try.
;D
Post by: richierich on April 19, 2009, 03:33:05 PM
(http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/9833/4142medium.jpg)
Super-secret-agent Harry Tasker (Arnold Schwarzenegger) has a wife (Jamie Lee Curtis) who thinks he's just a boring salesman--so she has an affair with a salesman who claims he's a secret agent. This confusion mushrooms into a global crisis as Tasker and his wife are caught in the middle of a deadly plot by fanatical terrorists. Absolutely spectacular special effects feature Arnold flying a Harrier jet.
Suffering with man cold and wanting to pop in an old favourite, I stumbled across True Lies again and thoroughly enjoyed the repeat viewing.
James Cameron hits all the right buttons with this tongue-in-cheek espionage thriller, Arnie and JLC have an amusing chemistry between them, and Tom Arnold is the perfect foil. It seems the actors must have enjoyed making this film, the stunts and effects are out of the top drawer, and the blend of characters, action and laughs is perfect.
The movie never takes itself too seriously, spoofs the spy genre, and is a perfect family popcorn movie that doesn't lose it's flavour.
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on April 19, 2009, 03:34:20 PM
(http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/4795/27314medium.jpg)
High school senior Kyle (Chris Evans) gets a major shock when he discovers his SAT score isn't good enough to get him into college as an architecture major. A perfectionist, Kyle's resilient nature is sparked when he embroils his best friend Matty (Bryan Greenberg) in a madcap scheme to steal the SATs. The boys soon realize the enormity of the task ahead of them, and recruit an eclectic bunch of willing accomplices to help. Among their group are Francesca (Scarlett Johansson), an anti-authoritarian hipster whose father happens to work in the building where the elusive test scores are kept; Anna (Erica Christensen), an overachiever who flunked the test due to nerves; Desmond (Darius Miles), the school's star basketball player who wants to get into a good college; and Ray (Leonardo Nam), a hapless stoner who is only included in the group after overhearing Kyle and Matty planning the robbery in the school bathroom. Determined not to fail, the students overcome their different backgrounds and manage to work together by planning an SAT heist in meticulous detail. As the harebrained scheme becomes a reality, moments of bonding, hilarity, and a few lessons in life ensue, as well as a sly critique of the tests along race and gender lines.
Tedious, pointless excuse of a film. It makes you wonder if those involved when making it knew it would be such a lemon?
Poor acting, crap storyline, embarrasing humour attempt, the only saving grace in the whole film was an impressive Matrix scene copy.
Stick to the likes of Breakfast Club in this genre.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on April 19, 2009, 06:37:48 PM
(http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/8806/85414medium.jpg)
Alan embarks on a 100-mile hitchhike to see his mother in the hospital. Along the way he must confront his many demons - both living and dead -and in the end make the ultimate choice that will mean life or death for him and his mother!
Good book - awful film - how familiar does that sound??
Criminally bad adaptation, I'm surprised King would allow his name to be used on this dire attempt. Totally unengaging, pointlessly long, soulless and dull. The whole point of the film - choices - seemed to get lost in the telling
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on April 19, 2009, 11:55:15 PM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/7062/33587medium.jpg)
With tons of action, eye-popping special effects and nonstop laughs, here's a hilarious martial arts comedy about a team of misfits who take their best shot at winning a championship! Sing is a skilled Shaolin kung fu devotee whose amazing "leg of steel" catches the eye of a soccer coach! Together they assemble a squad of Sing's former Shaolin brothers inspired by the big-money prize in a national soccer competition! Using an unlikely mix of martial arts and newfound soccer skills, it seems an unbeatable combination...until they must face the dreaded Team Evil in the ultimate battle for the title!
Possibly tongue in cheek, some fantastic effects and stunts although oddly timed, this film is so bad I wondered if it was intentionally so? The dubbing was hilarious, clearly English speakers putting on Chinese accents, and the film seemed to miss huge chunks of storyline.
It is an awful mess - but at times hilariously so, and I must admit rolling up several times at it's ineptness.
If you like watching a train wreck on celluloid, get this if it's free!
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 19, 2009, 11:57:41 PM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/4696/1695medium.jpg)
Step into the courtly world of Savannah's top-tier law firms. Meet one of the brightest young stars of the bar, Rick Magruder. And witness how his obsession with a beautiful, mysterious client, stalked by her deranged father, plunges him into a world of terrifying intrigue and deadly deceit. As a hurricane bears down on the city, Magruder fins himself locked in a battle without a judge or a jury - only an executioner.
Robert Altman puts a John Grisham tale to film, and it was a fair effort. I was concerned to see Kenneth Brannagh in the lead, as he wasn't the first actor that jumped into my mind to play a womanising lawyer from the South, but he wasn't out of place. Duvall was wasted in his role as the weird father, with very little involvement in the film.
The atmosphere was good, but I did find the film a bit disjointed, and the ending much too predictable to be creditable.
:D
Post by: Achim on April 20, 2009, 07:33:14 AM
Possibly tongue in cheek, some fantastic effects and stunts although oddly timed, this film is so bad I wondered if it was intentionally so? The dubbing was hilarious, clearly English speakers putting on Chinese accents, and the film seemed to miss huge chunks of storyline.´
I understand the intgernational version had been recut, unknown to me is to what extent. However, the original Hong Kong version (which is what I own) might therefore make more sense to you.
Post by: richierich on April 20, 2009, 10:32:19 AM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/5467/3426medium.jpg)
Moore makes his fifth appearance as 007 in this, the twelfth Bond film. In this outing, the renowned British double agent must locate a weapons system known as ATAC, which controls Great Britain's submarines, after it is sunk on a ship in the Ionian Sea. While he must contend with a formidable foe in the villain known as Kristatos (Glover), he does have the lovely and talented Melina (Bouquet), the daughter of a scientist killed by Kristatos, on his side. For fans craving their old favorites, Blofeld, Moneypenny and Q all put in appearances. The stunts come fast and furious, most notably a breathtaking race down a ski slope at the film's opening. Academy Award Nominations: Best Original Song ("For Your Eyes Only").
Fun Bond film, with an amusing intro of remote controlled helicopter and Blofeld, swiftly followed by an amusing car chase with 007 in a Citreon 2CV. The stunts and action come thick and fast, the punny jokes cannot fail to raise a smile, the storyline an aside but willingly so.
One of my preferred theme tunes, and great to see all the old favourites such as Moneypenny, M and Q (gadgets galore), of course several beautiful women and suitable baddies (Particularly the subdued Glover and loyalty challenged Topol). As with most Bond films, the photography, scenery and backgrounds spare no expense, and still remain a hallmark of the complete series.
I particularly liked the 3d identifier, with dot matrix printer, oh we have come so far!
Not the most memorable - but still enjoyable viewing.
;D
Post by: richierich on April 20, 2009, 10:33:11 AM
Possibly tongue in cheek, some fantastic effects and stunts although oddly timed, this film is so bad I wondered if it was intentionally so? The dubbing was hilarious, clearly English speakers putting on Chinese accents, and the film seemed to miss huge chunks of storyline.´
I understand the intgernational version had been recut, unknown to me is to what extent. However, the original Hong Kong version (which is what I own) might therefore make more sense to you.
Have you watched the film? Is it meant to be intentionally bad??
Post by: Achim on April 20, 2009, 12:32:15 PM
Have you watched the film? Is it meant to be intentionally bad??Well, it's aware that it's an over the top comedy and not to be taken seriously. If you go in expecting the Citizen Kane of comedies then it will fail.
Post by: richierich on April 21, 2009, 11:45:35 PM
(http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9452/7049medium.jpg)
Wallace is an efficiency expert, managing the high profile downsizing of a major auto parts factory. But when he is hired to evaluate a small moccasin factory which seems from another era, Wallace has to reconsider the rapid modernisation he advocates, as he is confronted by the human faces such plans hurt. Summer City Drama set in the 1950's, in which four young men take off for a weekend of sun, sand, surf and anything else that takes their fancy. An Australian production.
Gentle and charming Aussie comedy with Hopkins as always stealing the show looking a pro amongst amateurs, and a young Crowe trying his best not to act, the storyline was interesting albeit a bit dated, and very much humour in the vein of Muriels Wedding. Best described as the equivalent of an above average TV film, this is worth looking out for in the bargain bins.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 21, 2009, 11:54:15 PM
(http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/4271/23135mediume.jpg)
In the acclaimed sequel to 'Planet of the Apes', another astronaut (James Franciscus) crashes through the time barrier searching for Taylor (Charlton Heston). The daring rescue mission leads to a subterranean city where mutant humans, who practice mind control, worship a weapon capable of destroying the entire planet. Both an action-oriented sci-fi adventure and a wry commentary on today's world, this second 'Apes' installment is imaginative entertainment for fantasy buffs of all ages.
I found the rewatching of this sequel on a large plasma screen disappointing, the effects were incredibly dated, and the make-up and costumes wanting. I remember the 1st time I viewed this as exciting and dramatic, but alas could not unearth those feelings again. Even the thundering hooves as the apes on horses chased the heroes did not feel as poignant as they did some years ago.
The storyline distinctly lacks the punchiness and though-provoking issues of the original, and ends in a very pathetic hammy Grand Central Station mock-up with telepathic aliens and a nuclear missile.
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 22, 2009, 12:19:36 AM
(http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/5682/61703medium.jpg)
At last there's a movie for anyone who's ever looked at the eccentrics and oddballs in his or her family and wondered: Who are these people? Jennifer Aniston stars in and Rob Reiner (When Harry Met Sally...) directs a star-powered romantic comedy about family, love, marriage and other major catastrophes.
Aniston portrays Sarah Huttinger, whose return home with her fiancé convinces her that the sedate, proper, country-club lifestyle of her family isn't for her, and that maybe the Huttinger family isn't even hers. Join Sarah as she uncovers secrets that suggest the Huttingers are neither sedate nor proper – and as Kevin Costner, Shirley MacLaine and Mark Ruffalo join the fun. The story is rumor. The laughs are real!
Laid back and easy going movie, quite a novel storyline link to The Graduate, the film was made for me personally by Shirley MacLaines brilliant role as the grandmother (and Mrs Robinson). It is a comedy romance with all the usual ingredients, several funny and embarrassing moments, a nice pace that keeps you watching, and of course a happy ending.
If you are a fan of this genre, and do not mind Costner and Aniston, then I would recommend this non-taxing film.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 23, 2009, 10:53:19 AM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/4018/14686medium.jpg)
In August 1914, seasoned British explorer Sir Ernest Shackleton embarks on his third excursion into Antarctic territory, planning to cross the Antarctic continent on foot--something no other explorer has attempted before. Only a day's journey from his final destination, Shackleton's ship, The Endurance, is trapped in pack-ice, where she will remain frozen for the next ten months, all throughout the harsh Antarctic winter. With dwindling rations, blizzards, boredom, and illness to contend with, and only each other and their faithful sled dogs for company, the crew grows restless, and Shackleton has his hands full trying to keep the peace on board. A turning point occurs when ice floes finally threaten to crush the ship, and the men are forced to take to the lifeboats. Now Shackleton, abandoning any remaining notions of completing the mission, decides instead to bring back his crew alive at any cost, even though the nearest outpost of civilization is on an island 800 miles away. Historic film clips of The Endurance shot by expedition photographer Frank Hurley, new colour footage of the eerily beautiful Antarctic landscape, as well as commentary by surviving family members and narration by Liam Neeson all combine to make watching this documentary a gripping experience.
Fascinating portrayal of the infamous expedition, well told and edited with the original 1919 'South' footage mixed in perfectly with relatives of the crew and historical experts. If you are uninformed of this amazing adventure, or want to learn more, this feature is perfect as a starting point. I would also recommend 'South: Sir Ernest Shackleton's Glorious Epic of the Antartic' as a most fascinating dvd showing the complete original footage
:D
Post by: richierich on April 23, 2009, 11:02:09 AM
(http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/4149/14923medium.jpg)
Jonathan Demme's THE TRUTH ABOUT CHARLIE is a swirling romantic suspense thriller, a remake of the 1963 Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn vehicle, CHARADE. Set in Paris, the film stars Thandie Newton as a British ex-pat whose art dealer husband is murdered while she's on vacation. Arriving home, she is met with an empty apartment, the French police, and an array of mysterious thugs who believe she knows where her husband stashed six million stolen dollars. Mark Wahlberg plays the handsome, beret-sporting stranger who comes to her rescue, but who may not be what he seems. Special mention goes to Tim Robbins as a shadowy American agent, and Christine Boisson as the cool-as-nails police commandant trying to get to the bottom of the matter.
Truly awful remake of Charade, Cary Grant and Hepburn would be spinning in their graves. The whole cast lacks chemistry despite some big star names, the writing is dreadful with a tired old plot full of holes, and every storyline and character twist can be spotted a mile off.
A dog of a film that should be filed under 'Trash'
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on April 24, 2009, 02:17:34 AM
(http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/3066/43620medium.jpg)
The World Series, 1909. Pittsburgh versus Detroit. Honus Wagner versus Ty Cobb. And thrust into the middle of this historic baseball challenge is young Joe Soshack (Shawn Hatosy), a baseball fanatic from 1985 who has magically traveled 76 years into the past - and into the lives of legendary baseball great Wagner (Matthew Modine) and his fiancée, Mandy Henton (Kristin Davis), Joe arrives on the scene clutching a rare, extremely valuable Honus Wagner baseball card, on which he hopes to obtain Wagner's autograph to make it even more valuable and thus solve his family's financial problems. Obtaining Wagner's famed signature should be easy - but Joe isn't prepared for the role he will play in Wagner's romantic predicament with Mandy and the ballplayer's passion for the rough-and-tumble world of professional baseball. As the last exciting game of the 1909 World Series is about to begin, Joe will attempt to change history - a situation that may trap him in the past forever! Enthralling characters and nostalgic period flavor make The Winning Season a nine-inning romantic fantasy for the whole family.
Fairly run of the mill sports associated story, this time with he backdrop of baseball, directed well and with a fair paced storyline that prevented the film slipping into tedium or over-sentimentality which often afflicts such productions. It is reminiscent of a Disney tv movie, a bit weepy with occasional drama, it will wash over you without making much impact. Modine was not a good choice for the lead, being unconvincing as any form of an athlete, but I thought Shawn Hatosy was particularly good.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 24, 2009, 09:13:47 PM
(http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/2153/11905medium.jpg)
Using a cast of unknown actors and newcomers, Ken Loach fashions another gritty social drama in SWEET SIXTEEN. In his acting debut, Martin Crampston plays Liam, whose mother is about to be released from prison on his 16th birthday. Liam recognises that the only chance for the pair of them to escape the poverty of their surroundings is to move away from the Greenock council estate they live on. However, to realise this dream he will need to get hold of some money. Roping in his friends to help, he sets out on a series of increasingly dangerous schemes to raise cash and soon finds himself out of his depth.
Typical Loach, gritty, at times depressing, a severely harsh look at modern society and it's youth stuck at the bottom of the pile. Incredibly difficult to follow some of the strong Scottish accents, to consider these were unknown actors the Director used is amazing as generally they were superb, especially Martin Compston in the lead role.
Completely unforgiving film, where the message that hope is futile and a better life does not exist for some of our society, is incredibly powerful and thought provoking. Not for the easily offended due to the continual coarse language and graphic violence, it is perhaps a film that should be seen as it is so raw and real.
;D
Post by: richierich on April 25, 2009, 12:55:05 AM
(http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/7363/3358medium.jpg)
In this eerie science-fiction ghost story, an astrophysicist (Sam Neill), haunted by the memory of his wife's suicide, joins a rescue mission to salvage his life's work: the Event Horizon, a prototype spacecraft capable of faster-than-light travel that has been missing for seven years. Their arrival triggers contact with something beyond human experience--and more dangerous than ever imaginable. Similar in plot to Andrei Tarkovsky's eponymous screen adaptation of Stanislaw Lem's science-fiction novel SOLARIS, EVENT HORIZON provides some truly potent moments in its often potent combination of horror and sci-fi.
I'm not sure why I can't fall in love with this sci-fi, it has all the ingredients I like in such a film, but something just doesn't work for me. Perhaps it is the cast which lacks union and chemistry, or a slow cobbled together storyline which drags the suspense out a little too long? Or is it the lack of original ideas in the film which is a horror/alien clone?
The effects are brilliant, especially the zero-effect ones, the score works well through the surround system, and you can't help but jump at several points. Try playing the video they find of the original crew in slow motion - unbelievable gore and depravity!
But there is just too much unexplained for me to get a high scoring review, the Latin speaking captain, where the ship had been and how it got there, the suicidal wife etc etc.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 27, 2009, 09:09:54 PM
(http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/1765/3843medium.jpg)
From the director of Mission: Impossible comes the thrilling, eye-popping science-fiction adventure Mission to Mars - starring Gary Sinise (Snake Eyes) and Tim Robbins (Austin Powers: The Spy Who Loved Me). The year is 2020, and the first manned mission to Mars, commanded by Luke Graham (Don Cheadle, Out Of Sight), lands safely on the red planet. But the Martian landscape harbors a bizarre and shocking secret that leads to a mysterious disaster so catastrophic, it decimates the crew. Haunted by a cryptic last message from Graham, NASA launches the Mars Recovery Mission to investigate and bring back survivors - if there are any. Confronted with nearly insurmountable dangers, but propelled by deep friendship, the team finally lands on Mars and makes a discovery so amazing, it takes your breath away. Mission to Mars is an action-packed rocket ride that will enthrall you with its stunning special effects and keep you on the edge of your seat.
2001 inferior copy, but with enough special effects and originality to make it viewable. A touch too much sentimentality in a sci-fi for my taste, but the pulsating score and thought provoking ending turned it from a potential onion to a respectable film. Acting was hit and miss, Robbins miscast but Sinise perfect.
Its a marmite film, you'll likely to love it or hate it. I sit on the fence as I found it ok.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 27, 2009, 09:17:54 PM
(http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/4596/3601medium.jpg)
Agent 007 is as daring as ever in the 13th installment in the Bond series. A maniacal Soviet general (Steven Berkoff) is about to cause a nuclear accident that will cripple Western Europe and make the USSR ruler of the world. In order to stop him, Bond (Roger Moore) travels by hot air balloon and folding miniature jet plane to exotic India, where the perils he encounters include a man-eating tiger--and the equally dangerous female head of an international smuggling ring. Maud Adams plays the fabulous villain, Octopussy. This film was released simultaneously against NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN, in which Sean Connery reprised the Bond role for the first time in 12 years.
A good start to the film specifically with the plane stunt through the hanger, but unfortunately the film slowly petered out like a dying flame. It hit the ridiculous mark when they played a Tarzan yell as Bond swung through trees trying to escape, and it never recovered after.
Moore is now showing his age (and his weight), relying heavily on perhaps one too many glib remarks and some disappointingly bad acting, and it is difficult to believe he is athletic and a daring spy anymore. The leading lady is unnoticeable, and the villain limp. The storyline is disjointed, and for a change the score and theme song do not inspire
One of the worst Bonds in my book.
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 27, 2009, 09:27:39 PM
(http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/9164/26793medium.jpg)
Michael Dunn (Andrew McCarthy) has a great choice of friends. A newcomer to St Basil's, a strict Catholic boys' school in Brooklyn, he falls in with Rooney (tough and dumb), Williams (oversexed), Corbet (a born follower), and Caesar (fat and self-styled genius). This rebellious group gets caught in the crossfire between the repressive and liberal elements in the school, represented by Brother Constance, who likes picking boys up by their ears, and brother Timothy (John Heard), the worldly young priest with a penchant for cigarettes and drink.
Donald Sutherland plays the stern but sympathetic headmaster, Brother Thadeus, in this warm and rousing comedy about a group of young boys growing up, rebelling and discovering who they are.
Nostalgic film from the 80's, a perfectly crafted mix of comedy and drama. The acting is top notch, Mary Stuart Masterson and Andrew McCarthy turn in great performances as the leads, ably supported by Kevin Dillon, Dempsey and Donald Sutherland as the headmaster.
Fresh outlook on adolescents, school years, discovering 'lust', and the growing pains of young lads.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 27, 2009, 09:32:58 PM
(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/3555/74653medium.jpg)
Mind-bending thriller about a killer video game. The real world and the game world gruesomely collide when a group of friends play 'Stay Alive', a mysterious underground videogame that kills the gamer whose character dies in play. In a death-defying race against time, the survivors must solve the mystery of the game while desperately trying to stay alive.
Teen horror in the vein of Final Destination, and although not amazing viewing it is not the worst I've seen. The idea of a group of pc gamers drawn into a deadly computer game which starts acting itself out in real life was good, although the movie relied too much on sudden noises and 'jumps' to provide the scary moments. A lot of the scenes are seriously dis-jointed and the cinematography is haphazard. The pace keeps you interested, and the storyline and acting are of an average quality.
Because of an immensely poor ending you are left feeling a little disappointed and cheated, and thus it has to be marked down as below average.
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 27, 2009, 11:42:07 PM
(http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/2109/35029medium.jpg)
Stan "Tookie" Williams founder and member of Los Angeles' notorious gang The Crips, was once the most feared man on the cit streets. His reign of terror was finally brought to an end when he was convicted of multiple murder and sent to the infamous San Quentin prison where, even from his cell on Death Row, his reputation lives on. But when journalist Barbara Becnel is granted an interview,instead of a brutal thug she finds a man intent on putting his life of crime behind him as well as gang warfare.
Unbelievably glossy portrayal of a murdering gang member, Williams is made out to be some form of Saint which is of course far from the truth. It amazes me how a convicted and self confessed murderer gets so much acclaim for his miraculous rebirth and consequent work and books to reduce gang crimes and the violent culture associated with many cities in the States. I wonder whether the release of this film was intentionally just before his clemency hearing?
As a film I did not find myself caring about the characters, Foxx is a good lead but did too many scenes which were solely focused on his face or in the visiting rooms, as if that would tell us his story. It is very predictable, artistic license has gone haywire by the director, and the violence and brutality of Tookies early life and initial time in jail is swept under the carpet.
This movie has had an overdose of Hollywood treatment and smacks of a PR piece by Tookie, and the legacy he built up in the 70's and 80's through extreme violence and murder is ignored. Emotionless and disappointing film.
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 28, 2009, 01:04:45 AM
(http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/1760/11078medium.jpg)
Set in Texas in 1963, Clint Eastwood's film is a subtle and haunting work that features what is perhaps Kevin Costner's best performance. Costner plays against type as Butch Haynes, an escaped convict whose tendency toward violence is masked by his affability. Haynes escapes with a more blatantly dangerous convict, Terry Pugh (Keith Szarabajka), planning to ditch him as soon as they cross the border. But Pugh's lack of self-control gets them in trouble, and they take a young boy hostage. Raised by his single mother, a Jehovah's Witness, Phillip Perry (T.J. Lowther, in a heartbreakingly real performance) is fascinated by Haynes's roughneck ways, and the two form a surprisingly strong bond. Eastwood takes a supporting role as Red Garnett, the lawman who, ineptly but inevitably, is closing in on Haynes. With a woman criminologist (Laura Dern) and a trigger-happy federal agent along for the ride, Garnett chases Haynes down while keeping their shared past a secret from his team.
Average kidnap/manhunt thriller, overly long, and a bit too telescoped. Costner again is quite menacing as the killer with a heart on the run, and his hostage TJ Lowther gives a superb performance. The direction by Clint is of course slick and seamless, and his performance with Laura Dern take back seat roles but are both effective.
Strong character development, excellent dialogue, and overall watchable.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 30, 2009, 10:24:23 AM
(http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/5092/46298medium.jpg)
Martial-arts superstar Jet Li delivers a break-out performance in the gripping, action-packed story about a man raised from childhood by a ruthless crime boss (Academy Award® nominee* Bob Hoskins) to be a violent killing machine. When a blind piano tuner (Academy Award® winner** Morgan Freeman) takes him in, Danny (Li) tries to start a new life, but his brutal life follows him, forcing him to fight back. Featuring breathtaking fight choreography by Yuen Wo Ping (The Matrix and Kill Bill: Vols. 1 & 2).
A boy raised like a dog, trained to kill by cockney gangster Bob Hoskins (perfect for the role), taken in by an all-seeing blind piano tuner, and supposedly set in Glasgow. So the plot sounds ridiculous, but it is still very enjoyable and entertains all the way through. A solid mix of tongue-in-cheek humour, incredible martial arts, good action and originality. Jet Li is typically impressive, and a supporting cast that includes Freeman, Condon and my old cockney wideboy favourite Tamer Hassan is sure to deliver the goods.
Park your reality and enjoy this action comedy.
;D
Post by: richierich on April 30, 2009, 10:38:13 AM
(http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7964/40133012.png)
Set during the height of the First World War, PASSCHENDAELE tells the story of Sergeant Michael Dunne (Paul Gross), a soldier who is brutally wounded in France and returns to Calgary emotionally and physically scarred. While in the military hospital in Calgary, he meets Sarah (Caroline Dhavernas), a mysterious and attractive nurse with whom he develops a passionate love. When Sarah's younger asthmatic brother David (Joe Dinicol) signs up to fight in Europe, Michael feels compelled to return to Europe to protect him. Michael and David, like thousands of Canadians, are sent to fight in the third battle of Ypres, a battle against impossible odds, commonly known as “Passchendaele”. It is a story of passion, courage and dedication, showing the heroism of those that fought in battle, and of the ones that loved them.
Canadian film told with compassion and noble ambition, certainly a story that on paper appears more interesting than it did on the big screen. To say the special feature 'the road to Passchendaele' available from the extras is twice as good as the film is no exaggeration, it is one of the better making-of features I have seen before, and is wholly more memorable than a lot of the actual film.
The war scenes in the movie, gruesome muddy trench warfare with pointless but courageous deaths, are simply amazing, intense, and challenge Saving Private Ryan for quality, and pull this film above what could of been a quite tedious affair. Unfortunately the romance between the leads continually muffles the film, is unbelievable, and eventually causes what could have been a great war film to misfire.
:D
Post by: richierich on April 30, 2009, 10:53:00 AM
(http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/6889/4152medium.jpg)
In this remake and updated version of the 1965 THUNDERBALL, James Bond (Sean Connery), who has been primarily teaching for the last few years, is quite happily yanked out of semiretirement to deal with the deadly SPECTRE organization's newest plan for the destruction of the planet. (The Bond story line mimics Connery's semiretirement from the role, which he had last played in 1971's DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER.) Agent Number 2, also known as Maximilian Largo (Klaus Maria Brandauer), has managed to steal two cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads, and Agent Number 1, Blofeld (Max von Sydow), has threatened to explode them in areas with large populations if a huge, and almost impossible, ransom demand from the NATO countries is not met. The film features an excellent gaming battle between Largo and Bond, as well as stunning turns by Barbara Carrera and Kim Basinger. Technically not an offical Bond movie, NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN was released around the same time as OCTOPUSSY, starring Roger Moore.
Looks like a Bond, smells like a Bond, sounds like a Bond, but it isn't a Bond!
Despite the ingredients being similar, they could not quite replicate the winning formula that is 007. Connery does his best to pull the film through, Bassinger was a convincing Bond girl, and the sexy Barbara Carrera raised temperatures especially when dressed as a nurse with long leather boots. There were exotic locations, plenty of action and fights, and I am sure a fairly hefty budget.
But now the negatives and why it cannot be considered in the same breath as the 007 series. The theme tune is weak, the opening titles (minus the sexist girls) are run of the mill, M is a disaster with Edward Fox, Q is basically absent, lack of flirting with Moneypenny, 007's glib remarks lack the typical punch and cheesiness, the action is below par, the effects disappointed several times (notably the missile scenes), distinct lack of gadgets, and a different and inferior feel to the whole production compared to the mainstream Bonds.
Close - but no cigar
:-\
Post by: richierich on April 30, 2009, 10:59:34 AM
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/2918/96227medium.jpg)
Holly Kennedy (Hilary Swank) is beautiful, smart and married to the love of her life - a passionate, funny and impetuous Irishman named Gerry (Gerard Butler). So when Gerry's life is taken by an illness, it takes the life out of Holly. The only one who can help her is the person who is no longer there. Nobody knows Holly better than Gerry. So it's a good thing he planned ahead!
Before he died, Gerry wrote Holly a series of letters that will guide her, not only through her grief but in rediscovering herself. The first message arrives on Holly's 30th birthday in the form of a cake, and to her utter shock, a tape recording from Gerry, who proceeds to order her to 'get out and celebrate herself!' In the weeks and months that follow, more letters from Gerry are delivered, each sending her on a new adventure and each signing off in the same way: P.S. I Love You!
Above average chickflick, an engaging cast and touching storyline keeps the film of interest and ahead of the typicaly gooey titles from this rom-com genre. Apparently it is a mile away from the original novel, which was set solely in Dublin, but fortunately I hadn't read it so this hasn't spoiled it for me.
Hilary Swank is unusually convincing in her lead role, and the chemistry with all the main cast works well. It is of course very sentimental and thought provoking, and will make you consider your own circumstances for a nano-second.
Did I cry watching this - of course not - but my partner did boo and thus directs you to the perfect target audience for the movie, and guaranteed to give all fellas brownie points if they sit through this with their better halfs.
:D
Post by: Tom on April 30, 2009, 06:38:23 PM
Unleashed
;D
I have had this one on my unwatched pile for quite some time. Seems like I should watch it soon.
Post by: richierich on May 11, 2009, 10:52:02 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9687/38657830.png)
"I was born under unusual circumstances . . ."
Thus begins The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, the Academy Award®-winning film starring Brad Pitt as a man who is born in his eighties and ages backward, and Cate Blanchett as the woman he is destined to love forever. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is a monumental journey - as unusual as it is epic - that follows Benjamin's remarkable adventure of romance and redemption from the end of World War I through the 21st Century. Winner of three Academy Awards , The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is "one of the best movies of the decade!" (Karen Durbin, Elle)
Interesting production with very novel storyline, it is over-hyped, overly long and surprisingly well acclaimed critically, but never stretches itself from a good film to a great film. It reminded me a lot of Forrest Gump with the narrative voice-over, lead character in the middle of history, and very similar direction which was a surprise given Finchers previous movies. I believe both films have the same author?
Cate Blanchett and Brad Pitt are ideally cast, and do a good job breezing through the script. The supporting cast are also unilaterally excellent in their roles. The CGI and make-up are unbelievable and totally convincing, helping Pitt portray Benjamin at several ages.
This is traditional escapism with a simple story, a romantic drama with an unusual theme, well told and adequately acted, but for me on first viewing I did not fall overly in love with the whole picture.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 11, 2009, 11:06:01 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/7597/5890medium.jpg)
The time is now. The place is aboard the U.S.S. Nimitz, America's mightiest nuclear-powered aircraft carrier on maneuvers in the Pacific Ocean. Suddenly, a freak electrical storm engulfs the ship and triggers the impossible: The Nimitz is hurtled back in time to December 6, 1941, mere hours before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. As the enemy fleet speeds towards Hawaii, the warship's Captain (Kirk Douglas), a Defense Department expert (Martin Sheen), a maverick Air Wing Commander (James Farentino) and a desperate Senator in the Roosevelt administration (Charles Durning) must choose between the unthinkable. Do they allow the Japanese to complete their murderous invasion or launch a massive counter-strike that will forever change the course of history?
Once described as the 'Twilight Zone on steroids' with it's larger budget, I couldn't have put it better myself.
I am much more interested in the concept than the delivery, it is a great what-if scenario and one would of hoped the film matched the potential of the idea. Sadly it was disappointing in many areas, the transition scenes are comicaly bad, I never warmed to many of the cast including Douglas, the ending is telegraphed, it has dated poorly, there are no battle scenes, and very little suspense. I would love to see this rewritten and made with todays technology and financial clout.
The outcome leaves you feeling cheated, and the film overall never met it's potential.
:-\
Post by: richierich on May 11, 2009, 11:17:58 AM
(http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/5458/2392medium.jpg)
THE TRENCH tells the story of a group of young British soldiers on the eve of the Battle of the Somme in the summer of 1916, the worst defeat in British military history. Against this ill-fated backdrop, the movie depicts the soldiers' experience as a mixture of boredom, fear, panic, and restlessness, confined to a trench on the front lines. At the center of the troops is 17-year-old Billy MacFarlane (Paul Nicholls), who alongside his older brother, Eddie (Tam Williams), has volunteered for service. Like their fellow squad members, they are boys dressed as men. Their survival is in the hands of war-hardened Saergeant Winter (Daniel Craig) and bookish Lieutenant Hart (Julian Rhind-Tutt). However, when word comes that the squad will join the first wave of the attack, they all face an equal fate.
Full of character cliches, cringe-worthy dialogue, totally inaccurate historical detail, embarrasingly cheap sets, this film was a mess from start to finish, and a total waste of the acting talent available. Do they believe that anyone would think the trenches before the Somme would be spotless and dry, full of clean cheery soldiers in perfect health, lolling about without any sense of imminent danger?
This is a totally unconvincing production, a major disappointment and an insult to the viewer.
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on May 11, 2009, 11:31:52 AM
(http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/3487/44462321.png)
Wesley Snipes stars as the tortured soul Blade - half man, half immortal. Blade sharpens his lethal skills under the guidiance of Whistler (Kris Kristofferson), his mentor, guardian and fellow hunter of the night. When the bloodthirsty Immortals' lord, Deacon Frost (Stephen Dorff), declares war on the human race, Blade is humanity's last hope for survival.
Rewatching the first installment as I begin a short Blade trilogy of viewings.
Kick-ass film that needs little reviewing as most have seen this movie. Extreme violence centred around an 'at-the-time' supercool Snipes, the effects are slickly top notch and there is great attention to style and detail. Forget the scriptual flaws and get immersed in the fights, especially superb through a good home cinema system that will get the blood pumping.
Top drawer vampire battling horror action movie - it is FANGtastic.
;D
Post by: richierich on May 11, 2009, 11:34:22 AM
(http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/4999/9133medium.jpg)
'WHEN THE WORLD IS THREATENED BY A NEW AND DEADLIER BREED OF SUPER VAMPIRE', the legendary Blade ('Wesley Snipes') and his mentor Whistler ('Kris Kristofferson') must join forces with the Bloodpack, an elite team of vampire warriors made up of his sworn enemies. In order to stop the carnage these ravenous fiends must be destroyed at all costs in this high-voltage adventure, exploding with spectacular effects and martial arts action. The electrifying Snipes reprises his role from the original cult classic, 'Blade.'
Pretty much a carry-on in style and format as the first, the quality of the fight-sequences remained as good as in the original movie, and the action continues in the in-yer-face format. Snipes as Blade again delivers the goods, Nyssa Damaskinos is an attractive female baddie, and the film is still 'cool'.
However the script is slightly weaker than the original, very little intrigue or guesswork, and on the whole drops this sequel down one level from Blade.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 11, 2009, 11:37:33 AM
(http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/1200/62569medium.jpg)
Blade (Wesley Snipes) returns as the ultimate vampire hunter in the explosive third and final film, Blade: Trinity. For years, Blade has fought against the vampires in the cover of the night. But now, after falling into the crosshairs of the FBI, he is forced out into the daylight, where he is driven to join forces with a clan of human vampire hunters he never knew existed - The Nightstalkers. Together with Abigail (Jessica Biel) and Hannibal (Ryan Reynolds), two deftly trained Nightstalkers, Blade follows a trail of blood to the ancient creature that is also hunting him, the original vampire, Dracula.
Disappointing finale to the trilogy of films, this movie fails to deliver the goods, has none of the originality of the first Blade, and does not highlight the advances in film-making, stuntwork and CGI that occured between the 2 films production dates. The acting is off the mark, especially Ryan Reynolds as the wisecracking ex-vampire who just comes across as a real prat. The whole movie reminded me of a straight to video enterprise designed to cash-in on previous success.
Poor imagery, stunted and ill fitting soundtrack, haphazard filming and characters you never care for, with a script so full of holes it could be edam, I would recommend any fans of the first 2 Blades to pretend Trinity doesn't exist.
The concept was well and truly SUCKED DRY by the end of Blade 2.
:-\
Post by: DJ Doena on May 11, 2009, 12:46:40 PM
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
I believe both films have the same author?
The Curious Case of Forrest Gump:
http://www.isnichwahr.de/r15811659-the-curious-case-of-forrest-gump.html
Post by: richierich on May 13, 2009, 10:24:49 AM
(http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/2668/3602medium.jpg)
Agent 007 (Roger Moore) races against time to stop a power-mad industrialist (Christopher Walken) who plots to kill millions in order to corner the world’s microchip supply. From the Eiffel Tower to the top of the Golden Gate Bridge, James Bond can’t be stopped!
Unconvincing and dated plot and a tired Moore in a corset as Bond, made this outing slightly below par. There is still plenty of action and memorable excitement, the scenes around the Eiffel Tower and the opening skiing shots especially. Walken, McNee and Grace Jones are welcome additions to the 007 film series, Tanya Roberts an unmitigated disaster.
The best part of the film is of course the superb role of Alison Doody as Jenny Flex, who can forget these immortal lines on meeting Bond?;
Jenny approaches Bond wearing tight Jodhpurs outside Zorins residence...
Jenny - Good afternoon, I'm Jenny Flex
Bond - of course you are (raises eyebrow)
walks up stairs...
Bond - I expect you spend a lot of time in the saddle
Jenny - Oh I love an early morning ride
Bond - I'm an early riser myself (raises eyebrow)
Classic lines, not sure if they could get away with so easily now.
Overall though as Moores last outing, this movie does not deliver enough punch, and the storyline has proved flimsy and dated.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 13, 2009, 08:58:54 PM
(http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/8787/125567medium.jpg)
Danny Dyer (The Business, Football Factory) and Tamer Hassan (The Business, Layer Cake) return to explosive form in the year's most highly anticipated Brit-flick.
Welcome to the world of the City Rats where eight lives collide in a Pulp Fiction style blend that reveals London's true dark and twisted underbelly.
Dyer and Hassan give career-best performances in their first collaboration since British gangster film The Business.
Very low budget film, and sadly poor quality given the cast involved.
It is very slow, glimpsing a dark and depressing underbelly in London society, with the expected coarse language drinks and drugs associated with Danny Dyer.
There is a sense of intrigue to last the course as the characters lives ponderously intertwine together, but unlike Crash it wasn't worth waitng for.
Overly emotional and self-absorbent, possibly the only high point was a wonderful performance by Susan Lynch as the crippled whore.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on May 13, 2009, 09:15:54 PM
(http://img503.imageshack.us/img503/3138/91572medium.jpg)
Based on a true story, Raymond Fernandez (Jared Leto) and Martha Beck (Salma Hayek) are two psychopaths with a passion for hot-blooded sex and cold-blooded murder. Placing ads in singles magazines, they prey on a series of rich, lonely women, whom they later swindle and kill. Leaving a trail of bodies that stretches from New York to Michigan, Raymond and Martha believe they're literally getting away with murder, until homicide detectives Elmer C. Robinson (John Travolta) and Charles Hildebrandt (James Gandolfini) pick up their trail. Co-starring Laura Dern, Scott Caan and Alice Krige.
Gritty fact based crime drama, with a stand-out performance by Salma Hayek as the psychotic lover. The pace isn't electric, but surely it mirrors the true story and as such any further editing would have left out key elements.
The period settings were convincing, and the cast all deliver excellent performances. I will look out for the Honeymoon Killers now, to compare that portrayal of the Lonely Hearts killers against this film.
;D
Post by: richierich on May 14, 2009, 10:18:51 AM
(http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/6849/7547medium.jpg)
In this riveting, tension-filled psychological thriller, a young woman (SANDRA BULLOCK) mysteriously disappears, sending her boyfriend Jeff (KIEFER SUTHERLAND) on a years-long quest to find her. Not even a new love (NANCY TRAVIS) can keep him from his obsessive search. All the while, the calculating psychopath (JEFF BRIDGES) who kidnapped his girlfriend stalks Jeff, ultimately taking him through the exact same steps that led to the crime. In order to find out what really happened, Jeff must put his own life in the hands of this devious stranger.
Psycho-thriller pulled from average status by some top-notch acting from leads Sutherland and Bridges. Never seen the original but may have to invest in that now.
I was never sure of the motive of the killer, why he did the original kidnap and then years later the obsession with the victims husband? Bridges was eerie and original in the role, but what was the thinking behind the accent and slow talking, which was accentuated through the film?
Overall an enjoyably tense, jumpy, watchable thriller with a very exciting ending.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 14, 2009, 10:21:51 AM
(http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/469/15248medium.jpg)
In this installment of the James Bond series, Agent 007 (Timothy Dalton) is assigned to protect a Russian defector (Maryam d'Abo) from the KGB. When the defection proves to be an elaborate ploy, Bond woos her anyway, and together they follow a trail to a crooked American arms dealer supplying weapons to Afghanistan. Dalton finally assumes the role of Bond after refusing it 16 years earlier with DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER. The film is loosely based on Ian Fleming's short story.
Dalton brought a certain charm and seriousness to Bond, but never seemed to have an edge either in action or delivering the one-liners. The opening scenes racing across Gibraltor were excellent, and the cast work well together in what must be perhaps the last 007 film shot during the cold war.
This decent spy thriller would have deserved a better mark, but was really let down by what I thought was a disappointing ending.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 17, 2009, 12:04:40 AM
(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/4539/121849medium.jpg)
When the top players of the Green Street Elite are imprisoned following a deadly battle with their archenemies Milwall, every day becomes a fight for survival. On the inside, rival firms and prison guards will stop at nothing to make their lives a living hell, leaving the lads with no choice but to stand their ground and fight... So when the opportunity of early release arises, the boys will stop at nothing to beat Milwall to the punch.
This is quite possibly the worst film I have seen for some years. The original was dumb, but enjoyable with a certain element of reality and a decent cast. This supposed sequel doesn't have a single redeeming feature, the violence is pointless and unbelievable, amateurish choreography and B grade casting. The script is ridiculous and totally implausible, with a supposed shortass female prison guard the evil leader of all the wrongdoings. How did this ever get past the scripting stage, and more amazingly who ever agreed to fund it?
Shocking waste of time and money
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on May 17, 2009, 12:10:48 AM
(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/6610/117197medium.jpg)
Mickey Rourke gives the performance of a lifetime as pro wrestler Randy "The Ram" Robinson, a former superstar now paying the price for twenty years of grueling punishment in and out of the ring. But he's about to risk everything to prove he has one more match left in him: a re-staging of his famous Madison Square Garden bout against "The Ayatollah." Darren Aronofsky directs a powerful cast in this action-packed saga of guts, glory and gritty determination that is "as irresistible as a headlock" (New York Post).
Gritty, enlightening view of the wrestling world away from the glitzy shows you see on television.
Rourke's performance is absolutely incredible, for a written off actor to deliver such an amazing portrayal is astonishing, and his character is so brilliantly portrayed you find it painful to witness his fall from grace and his day to day survival. Tomei also puts in a first class (and sexy) performance as a tired and bitter stripper, her downfall mirroring the Rams.
With a superb soundtrack, moving storyline, frightening insight into the wrestling world and it's drug enhanced performers, dark humour and in-depth character portrayals, this is an absolute must see for everyone. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on May 17, 2009, 03:43:11 PM
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/3610/101706medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winner Jon Voight (Best Actor, 'Coming Home', 1978), Terence Stamp and Trent Ford star in this film based on the true story of the Mountain meadows Massacre -- the brutal murder of 120 men, women and children on September 11, 1857, as their wagon train passed through Utah on its way to California. The question of whether the attack was carried out by local Paiute Indians or by a renegade sect of the Mormon church remains unresolved to this day.
Set against the breathtaking beauty of the Utah mountains, 'September Dawn' explores what might have happened when the ill-fated settlers stopped near Cedar City to rest before completing the last leg of their journey. Local Mormon Bishop Jacob Samuelson (Vought) is suspicious of the group, so he dispatches his eldest son Jonathan (Ford) to spy on them. Jonathan soon falls in love with an angelic member of the wagon train, the minister's daughter Emily (Tamara Hope), and is horrified when he discovers that his father thinks the settlers are enemies of the church and is planning an attack on them.
While Jonathan makes plans to escape with Emily, his father sets in motion a chain of events, fueled by revenge and fanaticism, which culminates in a violent and tragic ambush.
Staggeringly based on a true story, it is hard to imagine how any man, in any moment of history, could have partaken in such a slaughter. Having read a bit more on the subject it is a bit biased, but if you can ignore a sloppy and fictitious love angle in the movie it is highly enjoyable.
A film with substance and some solid acting performances, notably Voight and Shaun Johnston, this is a skilful portrayal of a delicate subject. You are compelled to watch as the story unravels, culminating in a heinous crime supposedly ordained by gods will.
Fascinating viewing and given the cheap prices this can be picked up for, a true bargain.
;D
Post by: Najemikon on May 17, 2009, 04:41:38 PM
The Wrestler
(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/6610/117197medium.jpg)
Mickey Rourke gives the performance of a lifetime as pro wrestler Randy "The Ram" Robinson, a former superstar now paying the price for twenty years of grueling punishment in and out of the ring. But he's about to risk everything to prove he has one more match left in him: a re-staging of his famous Madison Square Garden bout against "The Ayatollah." Darren Aronofsky directs a powerful cast in this action-packed saga of guts, glory and gritty determination that is "as irresistible as a headlock" (New York Post).
Gritty, enlightening view of the wrestling world away from the glitzy shows you see on television.
Rourke's performance is absolutely incredible, for a written off actor to deliver such an amazing portrayal is astonishing, and his character is so brilliantly portrayed you find it painful to witness his fall from grace and his day to day survival. Tomei also puts in a first class (and sexy) performance as a tired and bitter stripper, her downfall mirroring the Rams.
With a superb soundtrack, moving storyline, frightening insight into the wrestling world and it's drug enhanced performers, dark humour and in-depth character portrayals, this is an absolute must see for everyone. I cannot recommend it highly enough.
:thumbup:
I'm really looking forward to catching up with this one. Yet to hear a bad word, plus Marisa Tomei is probably my favourite actress and never gets enough work. She's adorable and talented.
Post by: Touti on May 17, 2009, 04:43:49 PM
September Dawn
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/3610/101706medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winner Jon Voight (Best Actor, 'Coming Home', 1978), Terence Stamp and Trent Ford star in this film based on the true story of the Mountain meadows Massacre -- the brutal murder of 120 men, women and children on September 11, 1857, as their wagon train passed through Utah on its way to California. The question of whether the attack was carried out by local Paiute Indians or by a renegade sect of the Mormon church remains unresolved to this day.
Set against the breathtaking beauty of the Utah mountains, 'September Dawn' explores what might have happened when the ill-fated settlers stopped near Cedar City to rest before completing the last leg of their journey. Local Mormon Bishop Jacob Samuelson (Vought) is suspicious of the group, so he dispatches his eldest son Jonathan (Ford) to spy on them. Jonathan soon falls in love with an angelic member of the wagon train, the minister's daughter Emily (Tamara Hope), and is horrified when he discovers that his father thinks the settlers are enemies of the church and is planning an attack on them.
While Jonathan makes plans to escape with Emily, his father sets in motion a chain of events, fueled by revenge and fanaticism, which culminates in a violent and tragic ambush.
Rich I'm looking forward to your comments on this movie, I really loved it.
Post by: Jimmy on May 17, 2009, 06:29:35 PM
The WrestlerGlad to read another good review for this film. I was ready to bought it at the release day, but the studio had decided to laugh of us here (more than 20$ for a DVD with absolutly no extra). I just wait for a dvd deserving of the name to add it to my collection.
:thumbup:
Post by: Tom on May 17, 2009, 07:17:31 PM
I'm really looking forward to catching up with this one. Yet to hear a bad word, plus Marisa Tomei is probably my favourite actress and never gets enough work. She's adorable and talented.
Marisa Tomei is also the reason, that this movie is already on my wishlist. As soon the British Blu-ray is released and drops below 10 pounds, it will be mine :)
Post by: richierich on May 18, 2009, 11:21:32 PM
September Dawn
Rich I'm looking forward to your comments on this movie, I really loved it.
Review done Eric, I also enjoyed it :thumbup:
Post by: richierich on May 18, 2009, 11:26:16 PM
(http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/2425/94514medium.jpg)
Ben Stiller stars as Eddie, the 40-year-old confirmed bachelor who finally says "I do" to the beautiful and sexy Lila (Malin Akerman). But during their honeymoon in Mexico, the woman of his dreams turns out to be a total nightmare, and the guy who could never pull the trigger realizes he's jumped the gun. Take home the Farrelly Brothers' hysterical twist on boy-meets-girl, The Heartbreak Kid, and prepare to have a blast!
Fluff movie but with several gut wrenchingly laugh out loud moments to keep it above the politically incorrect humour gutter. Stiller is typecast yet again by the Farrelly brothers as the bumbling unlucky in love male lead, and the chemistry between the leads was never too convincing. It is overly long and the storyline struggled to fill the gaps, but the grossness and cringeworthy scenes manage to keep a smile often enough on ones face to enjoy it.
Not a masterpiece but about what I expected.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 18, 2009, 11:52:30 PM
(http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/9729/96225medium.jpg)
What if your own family stood in the way of everything you worked for? Bobby Green (Joaquin Phoenix) has forsaken his name to escape his family and their tradition in law enforcement to pursue his ambitions as a Brooklyn nightclub owner. As he turns a blind eye to the drug dealers around him, he comes face to face with the family he abandoned when his brother (Mark Wahlberg) and father (Robert Duvall) crack down on the club. Now Bobby must choose a side. Is he going to turn informant or will he help run the biggest crime ring in New York history?
A great film which slipped under the radar, with some stand out performances, particularly from Phoenix. He portrays the torn, angry and disillusioned night club owner brilliantly, and you feel by the 2nd half of the film you understand his character perfectly. It's great 80's soundtrack, gritty storyline and fitting climax made this film well above average, it is quite long but the time seemed to slip past.
The only major downside was Wahlberg, who's paralysed facial expression acting style, which works in some films, definately does not work in this movie and I was disappointed with his performance.
;D
Post by: richierich on May 19, 2009, 12:23:00 AM
(http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/2558/9280medium.jpg)
In the tradition of 'Grosse Pointe Blank' comes an unconventional comedy about two air traffic controllers whose intense rivalry and penchant for one-upmanship causes hilarious havoc with their careers, their marriages - and the planes in their airspace!
Nick Falzone (John Cusack) is the busiest, and the best, air traffic controller on Long Island - until Russell Bell (Billy Bob Thornton) roars into town like a motorcycle-riding cowboy. Fuelled by caffeine and machismo, the two men embark upon an uproarious contest of wit and wills that can ultimately only have one winner. Co-starring Cate Blanchett and Angelina Jolie, 'Pushing Tin' is "One of a kind... a high-flying, free-spirited, wildly funny blast of originality." (CBS-TV)
Comedy revolving around air traffic controllers which quickly meandered into an uneven tale of male rivalry. Sharp dialogue and some entertaining scenes, including the runway jetstream shot, do not make up for a poorly fitting cast and weak character development. BBT is interesting at first, but his inner being and reasons for his aloof demeanour are never explained fully, Cusack is unsympahetic to the role, and Jolie tries too hard in an undemanding position.
Despite a good opening the film is an anti-climax, the promise of a dramatic finale is lost in a too intense voyage in stress and marital problems.
I cannot recommend this film unless you buy it very cheaply and have a major interest in aircraft controllers!
:-\
Post by: Achim on May 19, 2009, 09:26:05 AM
Pushing TinI remember catching some of this on TV one day (quite a while ago). The scene I still remember the most to this day is the one on the runway (you'll know when you see it). Also, the climax at the end is quite exciting. (I hope this is not already considered spoilerific...) Depending your review I may want to look this up on DVD...
Post by: richierich on May 20, 2009, 12:10:04 AM
(http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/1664/95675medium.jpg)
"Tom Cruise gives one of the best performances of his career" (Jeffrey Lyons, NBC/Reel Talk) in this action-packed film from the director of The Usual Suspects and X-Men. Based on the incredible true story of Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg (Cruise) and his ingenious assassination plot targeting Adolph Hitler, this engrossing thriller reenacts the daring operation to eliminate one of the most evil tyrants the world has ever known. Co-starring Kenneth Branagh, Bill Nighy, Tom Wilkinson, Terence Stamp and Eddie Izzard, Valkyrie delivers gripping suspense and pulse-pounding excitement from start to finish!
Despite poor critical reviews I had read of this film, I thoroughly enjoyed it.
History paints a slightly different picture of nazi Colonel Von Stauffenburg (played by Cruise), he wasn't such a well meaning and untarnished hero as Hollywood gloss team would have you believe. However for the sake of entertainment the movie works well as a stand alone thriller, a complicated and dangerous plan that could so easily have worked in killing Hitler.
Some solid performances from Stamp, Brannagh and particularly Bill Nighy, help Cruise in one of his most convincing portrayals. However I couldn't understand why anyone would cast Eddie Izzard as a nazi, it just came across as a drag queen wearing a german army uniform! David Bamber's brief menancing role as Hitler was chilling.
Excellent adventure and well worth watching, I will view this film again and there is no better recommendation.
;D
Post by: richierich on May 20, 2009, 12:15:37 AM
(http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/1648/3722medium.jpg)
James Bond (Timothy Dalton) takes on his most daring adventure ever when he turns renegade and goes head to head with one of the international drug cartel’s most brutal and powerful leaders. This time, he’s fighting not for country, not for justice…but for revenge!
This is possibly the worst 007 film for me, Dalton is a disappointing lead, there are few moments of humourous respite, M has aged badly into the role, and the Moneypenny used in last 2 films is ill-fitting. The darker side of Bond is attempted here perhaps paving the way for Daniel Craigs portrayal, with his pursuit of revenge whilst renegade from the service. There are good stunts and a convincing villain in Robert Davi, and thank god Q made an impromptu appearance.
However I found this predictable, too far away from my ideal James Bond mould, and with a 2nd rate casting.
:-\
Post by: richierich on May 20, 2009, 03:11:54 PM
(http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/1958/3931medium.jpg)
In a bizarre case of nature versus humanity, a Saint Bernard infected with rabies by a diseased bat attacks a mother and her son. When the family becomes trapped in their car, they must depend on their wits to defeat the crazed canine.
Based on Stephen King's novel about a new England family beset by a murderous terror: the family dog.
Low budget adaptation, never quite reaching the tension/horror achieved in the original novel. The whole movie felt very dated, although the acting was fairly solid. Unfortunately a lot of what King writes can never be transposed on film, such as this case where you do not benefit with what the dog was thinking. In addition when a dogs tail is wagging furiously it is because they are happy, so when it is doing that whilst supposedly in a murderous rabid killing rage it spoils the effect.
A poor ending, and a dog you only felt sympathy for and not fear, makes this a miss.
:-\
Post by: richierich on May 20, 2009, 09:06:21 PM
(http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/9921/23692medium.jpg)
Stephen Dorff ('Blade'), Brad Renfro ('Ghost World'), Fairuza Balk ('American History X'), Frankie Muniz ('Malcolm in the Middle') and Drea DeMatteo ('The Sopranos') star in this stylish, tough and sexy gang drama that vividly captures the tumultuous passion and brutal violence that pervaded New York in the late 1950s.
In the sweltering summer of 1958, the Deuces, a gang of Brooklyn toughs, find their turf threatened when the leader of a rival gang, the Vipers, is released from prison. Leon (Dorff), the Deuce's leader, tries to guide his boys through bloody brawls to keep the Vipers out. But when his brother (Renfro) falls into a sultry - and dangerous - relationship with Annie (Balk), the sister of a Viper, and his own girlfriend is brutally attacked, Leon and his gang are plunged into an all out war to save his brother, his girl - and his neighborhood!
2nd time of watching, and this remains a bit of a disjointed and average film. Some good charismatic performances from the leads, and the storyline moves along swiftly enough. The violence within the fights is fairly graphic, albeit a bit unrealistic for streetfights, and the romance within the film is not too drippy. But as a whole it just wasn't gritty enough for a gangster film to suit my taste, such as the excellent Goodfellas or Scarface.
Best way I could describe it is a harder edged West Side Story without the music and dance.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 20, 2009, 11:34:15 PM
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1759/1300medium.jpg)
The Coen brothers' irreverent cult hit comes to DVD as a Collector's Edition, with all-new bonus material. The hilariously twisted comedy-thriller stars Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Steve Buscemi and Julianne Moore. Join the "Dude" and his bowling buddies on their journey that blends unforgettable characters, kidnapping, a case of mistaken identity and White Russians. Enter the visually unique and entertaining world from the creative minds of the Coen brothers and remember: the Dude abides.
DUDE!! whats all the hype over this film??
Inconsistent and over-rated, this is an ok 90's comedy with an odd script and inspired acting. I was really looking forward to this film because of all the rave reviews, and thus just felt disappointment when I finally viewed it. I can appreciate why some people could like this, with the Coen brothers typical collection of zany characters, and good performances particularly from Bridges and Buscemi. Goodmans character was irritating and I was waiting patiently for him to get killed at some point early in the film.
Average comedy, worth watching once.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 22, 2009, 01:03:20 AM
(http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/9085/4026medium.jpg)
They've got the weapons. They've got the posses. And they've got no chance against former Hong Kong cop Han Sing. Gravity-warping martial arts, cool visual effects and an all-star music track combine in this revved-up action movie from producer Joel Silver ('The Matrix') and starring Jet Li ('Lethal Weapon 4') in his first english-language lead role. Li plays rough-and-ready Han, who shares an attraction with Trish O'Day (screen-debuting songstress Aaliyah) even though their families are rivals in a fierce Oakland turf battle. The two also share plenty of danger as they try to find the real cause of the blood feud. No gun, no posse? No problem. With Jet Li going to war as only he can, 'Romeo Must Die' is alive and kicking.
Some great action scenes, and some funny moments with for once one-liners from Jet Li that don't make you cringe. The storyline isn't up to too much but what would you expect, with a twist so obvious you could spot it from the moon.
All in all good entertainment, nice blend of fighting violence and special effects which impressed.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 22, 2009, 01:08:50 AM
(http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/734/23229medium.jpg)
Christian Slater, Kevin Bacon and Gary Oldman star in 'Murder in the First,' the compelling, fact-based story of the trial that shut down the dungeons of Alcatraz. In a haunting performance, Bacon plays convict Henri Young. His crime: heisting $5 for his starving sister. His fate: worse than death. He's confined to the dungeons after a failed escape – an isolation lasting three mind-shattering years. When Henri at last emerges, he's confused, savage, barely human...and he quickly slays the stoolie who ratted on his escape. It's an open-and-shut case of Murder One. But a resolute attorney (Slater) has another option. He and Henri will put Alcatraz and its sadistic associate warden (Oldman) on trial.
Terrific fact based film, with an outstanding set of performances from Bacon, Oldman and even Slater!
At times a little over-intense, emotionally exhausting, but always entertaining and in it's context of being a true story quite shocking. Gary Oldman is a sinister monster as the nasty Warden Glenn who you can't help but despise, and R Lee Ermey was wonderfully cast as the abrupt judge. The portrayal is slick and keeps you interested, I was just disappointed by some of the camerawork, particularly when it was swivelling around the characters, which I found an unnecessary distraction.
A haunting film that stays with you.
;D
Post by: Najemikon on May 22, 2009, 01:21:42 AM
The Big Lebowski
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1759/1300medium.jpg)
The Coen brothers' irreverent cult hit comes to DVD as a Collector's Edition, with all-new bonus material. The hilariously twisted comedy-thriller stars Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Steve Buscemi and Julianne Moore. Join the "Dude" and his bowling buddies on their journey that blends unforgettable characters, kidnapping, a case of mistaken identity and White Russians. Enter the visually unique and entertaining world from the creative minds of the Coen brothers and remember: the Dude abides.
DUDE!! whats all the hype over this film??
Inconsistent and over-rated, this is an ok 90's comedy with an odd script and inspired acting. I was really looking forward to this film because of all the rave reviews, and thus just felt disappointment when I finally viewed it. I can appreciate why some people could like this, with the Coen brothers typical collection of zany characters, and good performances particularly from Bridges and Buscemi. Goodmans character was irritating and I was waiting patiently for him to get killed at some point early in the film.
Average comedy, worth watching once.
:D
:laugh:
One of the finest comedies of the 90s. I think you'll have a friend in Matthias, Rich! We had an interesting discussion about how wrong he was, and by proxy, how wrong you are too. :tease:
This is definitely a Marmite film. I think it's absolutely superb; first time, I scratched my head. Second time, it clicked. Probably on about the eigth time by now!
"or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing..." :hysterical:
Post by: goodguy on May 22, 2009, 03:10:51 AM
The Big Lebowski
...
DUDE!! whats all the hype over this film??
...
:laugh:
One of the finest comedies of the 90s. I think you'll have a friend in Matthias, Rich! We had an interesting discussion about how wrong he was, and by proxy, how wrong you are too. :tease:
It all starts here (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,3213.msg79997.html#msg79997). I give Jon credit that he often has to say interesting things about uninteresting movies. :P
I do recommend Robert Altman's The Long Goodbye as an antidote to the dude. The review is a little further down on the same page.
Post by: richierich on May 22, 2009, 03:11:50 AM
The Big Lebowski
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1759/1300medium.jpg)
The Coen brothers' irreverent cult hit comes to DVD as a Collector's Edition, with all-new bonus material. The hilariously twisted comedy-thriller stars Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Steve Buscemi and Julianne Moore. Join the "Dude" and his bowling buddies on their journey that blends unforgettable characters, kidnapping, a case of mistaken identity and White Russians. Enter the visually unique and entertaining world from the creative minds of the Coen brothers and remember: the Dude abides.
DUDE!! whats all the hype over this film??
Inconsistent and over-rated, this is an ok 90's comedy with an odd script and inspired acting. I was really looking forward to this film because of all the rave reviews, and thus just felt disappointment when I finally viewed it. I can appreciate why some people could like this, with the Coen brothers typical collection of zany characters, and good performances particularly from Bridges and Buscemi. Goodmans character was irritating and I was waiting patiently for him to get killed at some point early in the film.
Average comedy, worth watching once.
:D
:laugh:
One of the finest comedies of the 90s. I think you'll have a friend in Matthias, Rich! We had an interesting discussion about how wrong he was, and by proxy, how wrong you are too. :tease:
This is definitely a Marmite film. I think it's absolutely superb; first time, I scratched my head. Second time, it clicked. Probably on about the eigth time by now!
"or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing..." :hysterical:
:hysterical: :laugh: :hysterical:
I knew I'd get a reaction from you Jon :P
Seriously though, a whole film about a stolen rug being a fine comedy :whistle:
:tomato:
Post by: Achim on May 22, 2009, 06:18:46 AM
Seriously though, a whole film about a stolen rug being a fine comedy :whistle:McGuffin. Hitchcock did it all the time.
Post by: DJ Doena on May 22, 2009, 10:20:51 AM
Post by: Najemikon on May 22, 2009, 08:59:43 PM
I give Jon credit that he often has to say interesting things about uninteresting movies. :P
I do recommend Robert Altman's The Long Goodbye as an antidote to the dude. The review is a little further down on the same page.
I'll take that, thank you! :hysterical: And The Long Goodbye is excellent, though I did find it a little flat in places. The ending is superb, distlled noir. And Arnie is in it... :P
Seriously though, a whole film about a stolen rug being a fine comedy :whistle:McGuffin. Hitchcock did it all the time.
Well said that man. ;D
I was also told from different sides what a great mivie this is and how quote-worthy and so on. I watched it about a year ago. Once. It was an OK comedy, but certainly no masterpiece and I can't remember any of the quotes.
"you're obviously not a golfer..." :dance:
Post by: richierich on May 27, 2009, 11:06:14 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/773/107487medium.jpg)
WHETHER YOU LOVE HIM OR HATE HIM, there is no question that George W. Bush is one of the most controversial public figures in recent memory. In an unprecedented undertaking, acclaimed director Oliver Stone brings the life of our 43rd President to the big screen as only he can. W. takes viewers through Bush's eventful life - his struggles and triumphs, how he found both his wife and his faith, and of course the critical days leading up to Bush's decision to invade Iraq.
This film reinforces a question that has bugged me for years, how did he ever get to be president of USA, and even worse run for two terms?? Who in their right mind would have voted for such a buffoon???
Quite a bland film that washes over you without making much impact, very little new revelations concerning Bush and his cohorts. Dreyfuss is particularly excellent as badboy Cheney, Brolin is a passable Bush albeit less oafish, but the rest of the cast look so unlike the actual characters it is unconvincing. Particularly bad were the portrayals of Rice and Blair, and Jeffrey Wrights portrayal of Powell made him sound like a pantomine Harlem barber.
There is amazingly just one mention of the corrupt way this man came to power, and scant regard to explaining some of the reasons why he took such disastrous decisions through his terms. It is more concentrated on the relationship he had with his parents, wife, and his early years shown through flashbacks.
This film is too kind to what history may view as one of the worst fools ever to hold power, it is surprisingly muted and made you feel it was dumbed down to hide some frightening truths about the man who forced his countries men and women into unjust wars
:-\
Post by: richierich on May 27, 2009, 11:14:43 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/4991/7709medium.jpg)
Sexy and spirited, this endearingly funny comedy has captivated moviegoers everywhere! The charming Hugh Grant (Four Weddings And A Funeral) plays an idealistic young minister on a mission. He must tame the wicked ways of a notorious artist (Sam Neill – Jurassic Park), whose nude paintings of his beautiful models (including sexy supermodel Elle Macpherson) scandalize the nation! Intent on delivering salvation, the repressed reverend and his wife instead are led into temptation by their playfully seductive hosts and sensuous new surroundings! Enchantingly sexy fun from beginning to end – you too will find the allure of Sirens irresistible!
Slow film which appeared to just have the intention of showing naked women, and occasionally some naked men, literally through the whole 90 minutes. Thin uninteresting plot typecasts Grant again as a bumbling handsome innocent, and Neill yet again in a totally undemanding role.
There is slight charm involved with the awakening of innocence, but in truth this movie is worth forgetting.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on May 27, 2009, 11:24:40 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/8009/1596medium.jpg)
When '90's teens David and Jennifer (Tobey Maguire, The Ice Storm, Reese Witherspoon, Freeway) get zapped into the perfect suburbia of the black & white '50's sitcom, Pleasantville, what results is a "visionary adventure" (Peter Travers, Rolling Stone) that Siskel and Ebert give "Two big thumbs up!"
Pleasantville's perfect people include a mild-mannered soda jerk (Jeff Daniels, Dumb and Dumber), a socially repressed mom (Joan Allen, Face/Off) and a father who always knows best (William H. Macy, Fargo). But, when '90's pop culture clashes with '50's family values, chaos ensues, turning the town of Pleasantville upside down and black and white into color.
Totally enjoyed this quirky feature film, it was amusing, original, visually effective with the B&W/Colour mixing and challenging all in one. Tobey Macguire and Reese Witherspoon have perfect chemistry as brother and sister, and are well supported by the likes of Macy and Daniels.
The cinematography is sublime, special effects very impressive in an Indie film, the storyline entertaining and thought-provoking.
I would expect most serious movie fans to have this in their collections.
;D
Post by: richierich on May 27, 2009, 11:37:23 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/3056/103938medium.jpg)
Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman join forces with visionary director Baz Luhrmann in Australia, an epic and romantic action adventure set on the brink of World War II. When an English aristocrat (Nicole Kidman) travels to this faraway continent, she meets rough-hewn cattle driver (Hugh Jackman) and an enchanting aboriginal child (Brandon Walters). This unlikely trio joins forces and embarks on a transforming journey, driving a herd of cattle across hundreds of miles of the world's most beautiful, yet unforgiving, terrain. When their world is torn apart by powerful enemies, they must try to find each other amidst the bombing of the city of Darwin by the Japanese forces that attacked Pearl Harbor. With this new film, director Baz Luhrmann is painting on a vast canvas, creating a cinematic experience that brings together comedy, romance, drama, adventure and spectacle.
An epic film but seriously in need of a trim. At Slightly under 3 hours, it becomes hard work to sit through, and it could have comfortably had some narrative cutting without affecting the storyline. Nicole Kidman's upper class English lady act is enjoyable, and Jackman is just ok as Drover. The real star of the show is the Aboriginal boy they foster, Nullah played by Brandon Walters, who was absolutely terrific.
This is a very well directed film with startling scenery. However, it felt like 2 films sewn together, and at times the movie drifts into some very dull and unnecessary plot diversions. It isn't quite a 'blockbuster', but the portrayal of how Westerners treated Aboriginees in those days (right up to the early 70's) is probably the most frank and honest I have seen before.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 27, 2009, 11:40:47 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/2613/96243medium.jpg)
Four cops down: two dead, two likely. An NYPD drug bust has gone horribly wrong, and Detective Ray Tierney heads the investigating task force. He already has ties to the case. His brother was commander of the ambushed officers. His brother-in-law, a fellow officer, often partnered with them. The more Ray uncovers, the more those family ties are tested. And the more the fraternal order starts to fray. Edward Norton, Colin Farrell, Jon Voight and Noah Emmerich star in a gritty, tension-packed tale of a multigenerational family of cops facing hard realities and tough cohices. Set and filmed in Manhattan's Washington Heights, Pride and Glory draws you into a grippingly raw real world... and into a house divided.
Disappointing and unoriginal thriller, this family of cops facing corruption etc has been done to death, and a darned site better too.
The camerawork during the film is a disaster, shaky shots, spinning around, and zooming all around the place made it feel like the cameraman must be epileptic, and was difficult to follow. Despite some great actors involved, there are no stand out performances, primarily due to a weak script and overly long production. The direction is awful, swearing pointlessly excessive and the violence extreme for no apparent reasoning.
The ending
(click to show/hide)
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on May 28, 2009, 05:39:17 PM
(http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3600/54436medium.jpg)
Steven Spielberg's 'Empire Of The Sun', based on the autobiographical novel by J.G. Ballard, stars Christian Bale as Jim Graham, a British schoolboy separated from his upper-class colonial parents when the Japanese sweep into Shanghai during World War II. Temporarily orphaned, Jim attaches himself to Basie (John Malkovich), a fast-talking American opportunist determined make a buck off the spoils of war. Later, when the two are interned in a prison camp, Jim's boyish fantasies are fueled by the grace and daring of the Japanese fighter pilots whom he comes to idolise despite their enemy status. Spielberg's visually spectacular wartime epic is a testimony to the human will to survive and a child's ability to find wonder even in the midst of horror. Thirteen-year-old Welsh actor Christian Bale is brillant as Jim in his feature film debut. Spielberg himself identified more with Jim, a boy who is obsessed with flying and who experiences the death of his innocence, than with E.T.'s Elliott. After a year of negotiations with the Chinese, Spielberg and his crew were allowed to film in Shanghai, which was virtually unchanged since World War II.
A must watch epic, with superb characterisation, an emotional storyline, and a young Christian Bale showing immense early talent.
Glimpse into the world of yesteryear, and uniquely view a war through a childs eyes.
With Stoppards magnificent screenplay Spielberg crafted a masterpiece, and at todays low dvd prices which you can pick this up for there is no excuse not to proudly own it.
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on May 30, 2009, 10:05:20 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/2872/3949medium.jpg)
Pierce Brosnan ignites the screen in his first adventure as the unstoppable James Bond. When a powerful satellite system falls into the hands of a former ally-turned-enemy, only 007 can save the world from an awesome space weapon that -- in one short pulse -- could destroy the earth!
Thank heavens for the return of an enjoyable and likeable James Bond! Pierce Brosnan suits the role brilliantly, and with the introduction of Judi Dench, Robbie Coltrane and a new Moneypenny the series got back on track.
Memorable intro with the bungee jump down the dam wall, followed by a meeting with 006 (Sean Bean) and finally the skydiving from a motorbike off a cliff to catch the falling plane and escape. The theme song on the otherhand was totally unremarkable and very forgettable.
Action in bucketloads, effects to die for, the most gorgeous women (especially Famke Janssen from X-Men fame), and a lead who oozes charm, wit and daring in equal measures.
Park reality and enjoy a great film.
:thumbup:
Post by: Najemikon on May 30, 2009, 03:06:29 PM
Empire of the Sun
(http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3600/54436medium.jpg)
Steven Spielberg's 'Empire Of The Sun', based on the autobiographical novel by J.G. Ballard, stars Christian Bale as Jim Graham, a British schoolboy separated from his upper-class colonial parents when the Japanese sweep into Shanghai during World War II. Temporarily orphaned, Jim attaches himself to Basie (John Malkovich), a fast-talking American opportunist determined make a buck off the spoils of war. Later, when the two are interned in a prison camp, Jim's boyish fantasies are fueled by the grace and daring of the Japanese fighter pilots whom he comes to idolise despite their enemy status. Spielberg's visually spectacular wartime epic is a testimony to the human will to survive and a child's ability to find wonder even in the midst of horror. Thirteen-year-old Welsh actor Christian Bale is brillant as Jim in his feature film debut. Spielberg himself identified more with Jim, a boy who is obsessed with flying and who experiences the death of his innocence, than with E.T.'s Elliott. After a year of negotiations with the Chinese, Spielberg and his crew were allowed to film in Shanghai, which was virtually unchanged since World War II.
A must watch epic, with superb characterisation, an emotional storyline, and a young Christian Bale showing immense early talent.
Glimpse into the world of yesteryear, and uniquely view a war through a childs eyes.
With Stoppards magnificent screenplay Spielberg crafted a masterpiece, and at todays low dvd prices which you can pick this up for there is no excuse not to proudly own it.
:thumbup:
I don't know why, but this seems to be taken for granted. Almost as if people weren't taking Spielberg seriously, but I love it. I saw it first when I was much younger and some of the images have stuck with me as much as any other film of this sort.
Post by: richierich on May 30, 2009, 10:18:34 PM
I don't know why, but this seems to be taken for granted. Almost as if people weren't taking Spielberg seriously, but I love it. I saw it first when I was much younger and some of the images have stuck with me as much as any other film of this sort.
We agree, definately less known than its quality deserves.
The image that stayed with me was when he was giving the heart massage and the womans eyes moved
Post by: richierich on May 31, 2009, 12:23:28 AM
(http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/1267/4555medium.jpg)
A naive high-schooler named Charlie enjoys a symbiotic relationship with her favorite uncle, also named Charlie (Joseph Cotten). When young Charlie "wills" that Uncle Charlie pay a visit to her family, her wish comes true. Uncle Charlie is his usual charming self, but seems a bit secretive and reserved at times, and Charlie soon suspects the horrible possiblity that her beloved Uncle is the Merry Widow Murderer, who has been preying upon wealthy old women. Alfred Hitchcock's own personal favorite of his 54 films.
This may have been Hitchcock's favourite, but it is not mine.
It is a less engrossing thriller than I anticipated, although I felt on the whole the characterisations were superb. The uncle was suitably creepy, and I just loved Joe and Herb's amateur crime detective act. The first half was a bit tedious, but it did kick-off and get more interesting as the film wore on. The ending was cleverly shot for its time, although the suspense was a disappointment.
I didn't spot Hitch in this one?
:-\
Post by: richierich on May 31, 2009, 12:34:14 PM
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7572/1354medium.jpg)
On the magic Summer's night of high school's end, Julie, Helen, Ray and Barry get into Barry's new Beamer, and drive out to celebrate, their lives and hopes before them.
But on the road they have a terrible accident, hit and kill a man. In the shock and panic that follows, they dump the body in the sea rather than reporting the accident. As the body sinks, the hand of the dead man breaks the surface in a last grasp at life, then disappears into the murky depths. The four friends realise that they are now guilty of murder and swear to take their secret to their graves.
But now someone is stalking them, someone who knows who they are, knows what they did last Summer, and seeks revenge...
Cheesy stalk and slash teen horror, attractive cast and amusing and preposterous storyline. The suspense is ok, the acting as expected, but the stars of the show for me were Hewitts perky tits, which the director appeared to focus on with gay abandon and dressed them perfectly for display.
Good for some light relief, but don't take too seriously.
:D
Post by: richierich on May 31, 2009, 12:39:36 PM
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/5857/5407medium.jpg)
It's a recipe for nonstop action and excitement when the inhabitants of an isolated military outpost go up against a marauding band of cannibals in a deadly struggle for survival!
Guy Pearce (L.A. Confidential, Memento), Robert Carlyle (The World is Not Enough, The Beach) and David Arquette (Scream) must fight brutal elements of the Sierra Nevada wilderness - as well as their own murderous instincts - in this thriilling adventure, filled with "incredibly dark and brilliantly twisted horror." - LOADED.
What a pointless, preposterous movie, I had read such rave reviews but I didn't enjoy it, in fact found it totally boring and ridiculous. It is gory without the horror, in fact my personal thoughts were this was more a tongue in cheek comedy, with plenty of hamming by the lead actors.
If it isn't an attempted comedy, I am at a loss on how to review it? Perhaps a more informed horror viewer can advise it's correct genre??
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on June 03, 2009, 11:38:51 AM
(http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/2007/1776medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winners ROBIN WILLIAMS and CUBA GOODING, JR. embark on a supernatural journey beyond the realm of mortality in this visually stunning and unforgettable epic.
After Chris Nielsen (Williams) dies in an accident, he tries to remain close to his beautiful, mortal wife, Annie (Annabella Sciorra). With the friendly spirit (Gooding, Jr.) assigned to guide him, he begins to adopt to his new state of being in a setting that can only be described as heavenly. But when his distraught wife takes her own life, she is banished to an eternal damnation. Chris vows to find her so they can share eternity together, but no one has ever succeeded in rescuing a soul from such a horrific fate. With the help of his heavenly friends, Chris sets out on the most perilous and harrowing journey of his life, or afterlife: a quest for everlasting love that will take him to hell and back!
Morbid and downbeat, I found this film a struggle to sit through and lost interest early on.
Visually attractive, the storyline was flimsy, and it is best described as strange and complicated. A mixture of dead and live people inhabit a psychadelic screen, and the question of purgatory is forefront to the movie.
This did not grab my attention one iota.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on June 12, 2009, 12:35:30 AM
(http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/2853/106881medium.jpg)
Will McKenzie (Simon Bird) is on a bad run. His parents have just divorced and, to make matters worse, his mum has moved him from a posh school into the sixth form at the local comprehensive. Despite the twin handicaps of being the new kid and carrying 'an actual briefcase', Will quickly makes new friends - Simon (Joe Thomas), Neil (Blake Harrison) and Jay (James Buckley). Unfortunately, they are far from the coolest kids at school. Together they attempt to navigate the perils of sixth form life while trying to make girls, like the gorgeous Carli D'Amato (Emily Head), 'notice them for who they really are'.
Which is a bad move, because they are idiots.
Over the course of their term alone, the boy's roll call of dishonour includes; accidentally hitting a disabled girl in the face with a Frisbee, drunkenly puking on a seven year old child, gate crashing a funeral cortege in Simon's tiny, bright yellow car, and calling Neil's dad a 'bumder'.
I seldom review a TV series but I shall make an exception.
This was an hilarious and quite original Channel 4 series which received little attention when shown, but has since developed a cult status. It follows an old theme of young lads trying to score, but it is written so well, with recognisable characters from ones own school days, with the amusing adolescent banter found in every schoolyard or college campus, that you just have to love it.
It is real-life, near the knuckle, cringe-worthingly and a complete MUST BUY.
Please bang out a tenner and purchase this series.
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on June 12, 2009, 12:47:37 AM
(http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/8213/119076medium.jpg)
Korean War vet and retired autoworker Walt Kowalski doesn't like much how his life or his neighborhood has turned out. He especially doesn't like the people next door, Hmong immigrants from Southeast Asia. But events force Walt to defend those neighbors against a local gang that feeds on violence and fear.
Clint Eastwood works on both sides of the camera, winning the National Board of Review Award as Best Actor for his bone-deep playing of Kowalski, burnished into a "prime vintage Eastwood performance" (Peter Travers, Rolling Stone).
This film treads familiar territory in what is said to be Eastwoods swansong as an actor, and his presence on-screen is dominant, with some terrific and joyous scripting keeping an amusing undertone to the whole movie. There are hints of Dirty Harry in Walt, and the banter between him and his neighbours is superb.
This is not his best film, but nonetheless is still highly watchable and refreshing. It will not find favour with anyone too PC, as racial insults abound but are key to the underlying message of the film. The support cast work well in tandem, and although the film was quite long I never found myself clock watching.
If this is to be Clints last appearance in front of camera, he leaves on a high.
;D
Post by: richierich on June 12, 2009, 12:50:17 AM
(http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4779/2115medium.jpg)
Jean Reno, Gary Oldman, Natalie Portman and Danny Aiello star in LÉON, a go-for-broke thriller about a professional assassin whose work becomes dangerously personal.
Calling himself a "cleaner," the mysterious Léon is New York's top hitman. When his next-door neighbors are murdered, Léon becomes the unwilling guardian of the family's sole survivor — 12-year-old Mathilda. But Mathilda doesn't just want protection; she wants revenge. Training her in the deadly tricks of his trade, LÉON helps her track the psychotic agent who murdered her family. From the electrifying opening to the fatal finale, LÉON, is a nonstop crescendo of action, suspense and surprises. This version contains 24 minutes of extra footage never before released in America.
Great storyline with intriguing characters, Oldman, Reno and a young Portman all give top notch performances.
The mix between touching human relationship and action of a ruthless hitman is superbly directed and sympathetically portrayed, a masterclass by Besson in developing characterisations within a movie.
Touching, violent, moving and beautifully shot, this is an unforgettable voyage and experience, and a must for every dvd collection.
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on June 12, 2009, 05:56:30 PM
(http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/415/56978medium.jpg)
From Academy Award-winning filmmaker Ang Lee comes an epic American love story, Brokeback Mountain . Set against the sweeping vistas of Wyoming and Texas, the film tells the story of two young men -- a ranch-hand and a rodeo cowboy -- who meet in the summer of 1963, and unexpectedly forge a lifelong connection, one whose complications, joys, and tragedies provide a testament to the endurance and power of love.
For such an awarded film with so much hype, we were shocked to find it so boring and hollow. Is the fact that it is an emotional love story about 2 bisexual cowboys enough to warrant such undeserved acclaim? The storyline lacked any substance, the leads consisted of a mumbling and hard to understand Heath Ledger, and a marginally better Jake Gyllenhaal.
Agonisingly slow paced, and a complete yawn of a film.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on June 14, 2009, 01:53:38 AM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/9039/116235medium.jpg)
Best friends and teammates Rick (Sean Faris, Never Back Down) and Lars (Penn Badgley, Gossip Girl) become bitter rivals when Rick's free-spirited lifestyle lands him in juvenile detention. There a concerned counselor (Sean Astin, Lord of the Rings, Rudy) and a national championship rugby coach (Gary Cole, Office Space) recruit Rick for a new team - and a new direction.
Based on actual events surrounding the perennial powerhouse Highland Rugby program (379 wins - 9 losses, and 18 of the last 24 national championships), Forever Strong is a film that combines heart-stopping, on-the-field action with a life-changing story of victory.
Americanised rarity of a film revolving around the greatest sport in the world - rugby.
It is a fair effort, based on actual events, with a particularly good lead by an unknown to me - Sean Faris. The storyline remained interesting throughout, of clearly quite an amazing coach in real life improving young lads lives. The sporting simulations for anyone involved in the sport were a bit off the mark, but not irritatingly so.
Altogether an 'ok' sports based film.
:D
Post by: richierich on June 14, 2009, 01:55:52 AM
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/3180/19358medium.jpg)
If there's a sucker born every minute, these guys will work the delivery room. Meet Roy and Frank, con men who plan to flimflam a flimflammer out of big-time dough. They have a new partner to help them too: Roy's long-absent 14-year-old daughter, who has entered his life and is eager to learn the art of the con.
Just when you think you have it figured out you don't, during this acclaimed comedy thriller directed by Ridley Scott. Nicolas Cage is winningly quirky as Roy, genius at crime and basket case in life because he's an agoraphobe, a germaphobe and suddenly a parent. Sam Rockwell is wily Frank. And Alison Lohman plays the wild child at Roy's door. For fun, suspense and brain-busting twists, nothing's hotter than Matchstick Men.
Interesting film, intriguing plot, with a nice set of twists at the end that I didn't guess until close to the finish. Cage plays his neurotic character well, in an engaging and humourous story that Scott weaves well. The relationships and characterisations between the leads are particularly effective, and the performances and film stay with you.
Underrated movie that deserves watching.
:D
Post by: richierich on June 15, 2009, 10:39:43 AM
(http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/2396/2227medium.jpg)
Sparks fly as Zeta-Jones, an insurance agent, charms her way into doing business with Connery, an aging thief. In preparation for their latest heist, Connery has her suffer through a rigorous training camp. Promises begin to blur and dwindle as romance introduces itself into the picture, building up to a payoff that's sure to disappoint one of the involved parties.
Every once in a while you approach a film with little enthusiasm and low expectations, and it turns out to be a peach. This was just one of those occasions.
Despite not being a great fan of the 2 leads, and in truth with alternative actors may have been slightly better and with a more believable romantic undertone (although of course CZJ does like them old and wrinkly), the storyline, special effects, and fast paced action with a multitude of red herrings, twists and turns made this compelling viewing.
A good popcorn glitzy crime caper, with a generous amount of the film centred around CZJ well proportioned butt, if you can pick this up from a bargain bucket I would recommend it.
;D
Post by: richierich on June 15, 2009, 10:41:55 AM
(http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/2601/20795medium.jpg)
Laura Hillenbrand's best-selling nonfiction novel comes to life with this spectacular big-screen adaptation. Set in the 1930s, SEABISCUIT weaves its story around three men who turned a seemingly untamable horse into a bona fide champion. Jeff Bridges is Charles Howard, a thriving entrepreneur who gives horse racing a shot when his wife leaves him after the death of their son. Chris Cooper is Tom Smith, a mumbling, sensitive horse trainer who sees the untapped potential of Seabiscuit hiding under his flawed outer shell. Tobey Maguire is Red Pollard, a stubborn, oversized jockey who is determined to prove to the world that he has what it takes to be a champion. Together, these men use their individual gifts to mold Seabiscuit into a national icon, culminating in a showdown with Triple Crown winner War Admiral. But when Red breaks his leg riding another horse, Howard must call in George Woolf (played by real life jockey Gary Stevens) to keep the dream alive.
Enjoyable 'based on fact' story, much in the mould of a slightly gritty Disney film, with the expected clichés of small guy (or horse) turning good and wins in the end, triumph over adversity plotting.
William H Macy is a show stealer as the track/radio announcer, truly superb and one of his best roles. The pre-war setting is believable and efficient, the direction is crisp, the acting top-drawer and the storyline interesting albeit a little bit long. On the negative i did find some characters were under-developed and a few sub-stories seemed to fizzle out and disappear, but this does not detract too much from the overall enjoyment.
This is a good film, not too over-sentimental and puke inducing, and I must admit I punched the air at one point :-[
Feel good movie.
;D
Post by: Tom on June 15, 2009, 05:49:31 PM
Matchstick Men
Underrated movie that deserves watching.
:D
I haven't watched this one for a few years. There were a lot of times, that I had it already in my hand to put it in my player but then I decided otherwise and put it back into the shelf.
Post by: Touti on June 16, 2009, 03:32:43 AM
Passchendaele
(http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/7964/40133012.png)
Set during the height of the First World War, PASSCHENDAELE tells the story of Sergeant Michael Dunne (Paul Gross), a soldier who is brutally wounded in France and returns to Calgary emotionally and physically scarred. While in the military hospital in Calgary, he meets Sarah (Caroline Dhavernas), a mysterious and attractive nurse with whom he develops a passionate love. When Sarah's younger asthmatic brother David (Joe Dinicol) signs up to fight in Europe, Michael feels compelled to return to Europe to protect him. Michael and David, like thousands of Canadians, are sent to fight in the third battle of Ypres, a battle against impossible odds, commonly known as “Passchendaele”. It is a story of passion, courage and dedication, showing the heroism of those that fought in battle, and of the ones that loved them.
Canadian film told with compassion and noble ambition, certainly a story that on paper appears more interesting than it did on the big screen. To say the special feature 'the road to Passchendaele' available from the extras is twice as good as the film is no exaggeration, it is one of the better making-of features I have seen before, and is wholly more memorable than a lot of the actual film.
The war scenes in the movie, gruesome muddy trench warfare with pointless but courageous deaths, are simply amazing, intense, and challenge Saving Private Ryan for quality, and pull this film above what could of been a quite tedious affair. Unfortunately the romance between the leads continually muffles the film, is unbelievable, and eventually causes what could have been a great war film to misfire.
:D
I watched this movie last night. I'm not gonna write a full review of my own because I'm not very good at it and I would have to say exactly was Rich said but I couldn't do it so nicely. This could have been a very very good war movie............if it was a war movie but it's not. It's a chicks flick that uses a war story for background. It's called Passchendaele but in a movie that less than 2 hours you hear of Passchendaele for for the first time after 1 hour. Then as Rich rightly said, what could have been good (the last 45 minutes or so) is interrupted all the time by the chicks flick stuff.
All in all not a bad movie but I hope they'll do a Passchendale II without the romance stuff and tell the story itself.
Post by: richierich on June 16, 2009, 12:13:56 PM
(http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/3320/3951medium.jpg)
The British super spy goes after a ruthless media baron (an amalgam of Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, and Bill Gates, played with feisty aplomb by Pryce) whose diabolical plans include instigating World War III so that his empire can obtain an exclusive (a la CNN during the Gulf War). This time, 007 discovers sorrow in a love lost and a worthwhile partner in a female Chinese counterpart (Hong Kong action diva Yeoh). Noteworthy for its unabashed commercial product placement, Sheryl Crow's title song was nominated for a Golden Globe (Best Original Song - Motion Picture).
Average spy film, the start and first hour or so heralded great things, with excellent chemistry between Brosnan and Hatcher, but for me it rather fizzled out through a pedestrian and uninspiring storyline when the settings went to Asia. The villain (Pryce) was pathetic and an unbelieving media mogul, and a limp somewhat camp baddie in relative unknown Gotz Otto.
This what a stretch too far from reality for my taste, and a flimsy plot which did not deliver the goods. A missed opportunity after a great beginning.
:D
Post by: richierich on June 18, 2009, 10:24:19 AM
(http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/2231/41680medium.jpg)
A genuine stand-up-and-cheer movie about a courageous high school football team's fight to fulfill their destiny and live their dream, Friday Night Lights is "unforgettable and real" (Larry King). Billy Bob Thornton stars in a true American story of how one legendary Texas town made hope come alive under the exhilarating glare of Friday Night Lights! "One of the greatest sports stories ever told" (Sports Illustrated) is now "one of the greatest sports movies ever made" (Larry King).
One dimensional sports movie which I found overdone and trite. The characters were never developed enough, and the relationship between the high school team and the town was never fully explored. Full of clichés and everything bad about an American sports film, at some points I was literally retching with how thick the patriotism and nationalism was spread. Does the USA have to produce a film every year about some no-hopers pulled together against adversity to come good?? Stand-up-and-cheer, more like sit-down-and-sleep.
Empty and boring, a bit like Thorntons portrayal of the cowardly coach.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on June 18, 2009, 10:36:44 AM
(http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/5930/3209medium.jpg)
In Notorious, a brilliant allegory of love and betrayal, Hitchcock fuses two of his favorite elements: suspense and romance. A beautiful woman with a tainted past (Ingrid Bergman) is enlisted by American agent Devlin (Cary Grant) to spy on a ring of Nazis in post-war Rio. Her espionage work becomes life-threatening after she marries the most debonair of the Nazi ring, Alex (Claude Rains). Only Devlin can rescue her, but to do so, he must face his role in her desperate situation and acknowledge that he's loved her all along. Stunning performances, Ben Hecht's excellent script, and Hitchcock's direction at its best make Notorious a perfect film.
I will leave it to Jon to wax lyrical over this film, my knowledge of Hitchcock is very narrow in comparison and would not do it justice.
Briefly, it was clear to see the genius of Alfred in the direction of this film, some fantastic shots and suspense expertly delivered. Some truly chilling moments are handled perfectly, particularly impressive was the filming of Bergman, who portrayed so much with a look or close-up of her eyes. Cary Grants performance was edgy and masterful. Bergman was absolutely gorgeous and fitted the role perfectly, simmering and fervent.
Espionage, love story and betrayal, served up expertly.
;D
Post by: richierich on June 18, 2009, 11:02:27 AM
(http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/6383/1560medium.jpg)
Orson Welles' timeless masterwork (#1 in the American Film Institute's 1998 list of Best American Movies) is more than a groundbreaking film. Presented here in a magnificent 60th anniversary digital transfer with revitalized digital audio from the highest quality surviving elements [Disc One], it is also grand entertainment, sharply acted (starting many of Welles' Mercury Players on the road to thriving film careers) and superbly directed with inspired visual flair. Depicting the controversial life of an influential publishing tycoon, this Best Original Screenplay Academy Award® winner (1941) is rooted in themes of power, corruption, vanity — the American Dream lost in the mystery of a dying man's last word: "Rosebud."
As good as I remembered, a masterclass in film making, a moment of history, a lesson in cinematography. I am a movie buff, not a film enthusiast, so this never would be in my top 10. But it never misses by much, as a movie alone it is thoroughly enjoyable and has stood the test of time like few others.
Welles delivers a commanding and spellbinding performance, from young buck to old lonely man shuffling round his monolithic mansion, complete with amazing backdrops and sets. His directorship at just 24 is practically flawless, he clearly was gifted with a natural flair. The supporting cast of mainly unknowns making their first big features are tremendous, and were never a weak link.
The storyline holds up right to the very end, with the 'who is Rosebud' spine of the film lasting until nearly the final shot.
For it's time, the greatest film ever made.
:thumbup:
Post by: Najemikon on June 18, 2009, 08:08:16 PM
Post by: richierich on June 19, 2009, 11:36:09 PM
Looking forward to your verdict on this! ;)
Verdict delivered ;)
Post by: richierich on June 19, 2009, 11:52:09 PM
(http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/3345/106726medium.jpg)
Harrison Ford (Indiana Jones films) is on a quest for justice as an immigrations agent investigating the case of a missing illegal. In a cross-fire of crime and bureaucracy, fraud and murder, he must race against time to try to save a family from becoming collateral damage in the fight for the American dream. Critics rave, "Harrison Ford is terrific. An engrossing, thoroughly entertaining movie with great performances from a first-rate ensemble cast" (Pete Hammond, Hollywood.com). Co-starring Ashley Judd (Twisted), Ray Liotta (Smokin' Aces), Jim Sturgess (21), and Cliff Curtis (10,000 BC), Crossing Over will keep you riveted until the final mystery unfolds.
Average fare with Ford showing his age, and with his constant broodiness seen in several recent films not carrying it particularly well. What has happened to Liotta, did he get a welder to perform his plastic surgery?
Guys only -
(click to show/hide)
For Americans some of the questions raised, and ironies and hipocracies shown surrounding immigration, will probably be more poignant than they were for me. But this storyline has been overdone in recent years, and typically better, and this just misses the mark in too many ways, it actually felt like a dot the dot formula for such a plot design.
Best to leave this one at the border :-\
Post by: richierich on June 20, 2009, 12:05:00 AM
(http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/6165/106313medium.jpg)
In this laugh-out-loud comedy, Ford High’ s star football players Shawn Colfax and Nick Brady scheme to ditch football camp so they can spend the summer surrounded by beautiful girls…at cheer camp. The guys are having the time of their lives as they use their new reputation as "sensitive guy" to talk the hotties into skinny dipping, cheering naked, and hooking up. But when Shawn falls for the gorgeous head cheerleader who’ s suspicious of their motives, the players must change their game to prove Shawn's intentions before the thrilling cheer competition finals.
They broke the mould with Porkys and Lemon Popsicle, nearly rebuilt it for American Pie, but teenage sex comedies such as this are just tedious and over populated.
I didn't really laugh once, it was dull to the extreme, poorly written with wooden actors, and impossible to warm to.
Do not waste your money.
:yucky:
Post by: goodguy on June 20, 2009, 12:43:20 AM
Citizen Kane
...
As good as I remembered, a masterclass in film making, a moment of history, a lesson in cinematography.
It's been a while since I last watched it, but I remember enjoying the Ebert commentary much more than the movie itself. I understand all the praise, but it works even less for me than The Third Man.
Post by: richierich on June 22, 2009, 11:49:34 PM
(http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2716/116864medium.jpg)
Get ready for the comedy adventure that's "smart, funny, and tailor-made for the inner-Jedi in all of us" (Pete Hammond, Hollywood.com). In 1998, four childhood buddies with a shared love of all things Star Wars reunite for one final, hilarious odyssey. Their insane plan: a cross-country road trip to storm George Lucas' Skywalker Ranch and steal a copy of Episode I before it's released. With the police, a crew of angry Trekkies, and a crazy pimp hot on their trail, what could possibly go wrong? Featuring Dan Fogler (Balls of Fury), Jay Baruchel (Tropic Thunder), and Kristen Bell (Forgetting Sarah Marshall), plus a slew of hysterical surprise cameos, "the Force IS strong with this one!" (Brian Gallagher, MovieWeb)
One joke movie, that should have been put to sleep long before the ending. It is a geekfest overdone, do people really get so obsessed that they walk around in stormtrooper outfits and speak like Yoda? I'm sure some do, but it isn't entertaining. Not an original idea appears, we had a scene of accidentally walking into gay bar aka police academy, and the overused mistaken hookers in Vegas scene.
It was a laugh an hour, and not a belly laugh.
Another crap movie to avoid
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on June 23, 2009, 12:05:05 AM
(http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7991/2382medium.jpg)
When the suave Agent 007 (Pierce Brosnan) is assigned to protect a beautiful oil heiress (Sophie Marceau), he is catapulted into a passionate, adrenaline-charged adventure that pits him against one of his most deadly adversaries: Renard (Robert Carlyle), a ruthless anarchist whose total imperviousness to pain makes him a virtually unstoppable enemy. The unrelenting suspense, breathtaking action and sly wit never let up in this explosively entertaining thriller.
Well thought out plot, an endearing Bond, a superb villain in Robert Carlyle, and an outrageous action packed movie funfest. The characters are interesting across the board, Coltrane is back as Zukovsky, Judi Dench shines as always, and Cleese is introduced following the sad loss of Desmond Llewelyn who has a nice final farewell scene as Q. Denise Richards is ridiculous in the role of a nuclear physicist, albeit fantastic eye candy in shorts and breast hugging tee shirts.
Not the best of the franchise, but a lot that I enjoyed and thus I give a good mark for this film.
;D
Post by: richierich on June 23, 2009, 12:17:40 AM
(http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/2346/12038medium.jpg)
Pierce Brosnan plunges into action as James Bond in this adrenaline-pumping thrill-ride, co-starring Oscar® winner* Halle Berry. Bristling with excitement, bursting with explosive special effects and surging with high-octane chases, Die Another Day is a pulse-pounding adventure with "super cool quality from start to finish" (NEWS OF THE WORLD). "Bond is back and it's even better than ever" (THE SUN).
An amazing start, complete with spies surfing in to North Korea, an amazing action sequence with hovercrafts, and then a memorable set where Bond is held captive and given up by MI6. However the film slowly drifted away, somewhere it just didn't work. The choice of Berry was poor, as she tried desperately to steal every scene and spewed cringeworthy lines, and the speed she dropped her pants was amazing even by 007 standards - a couple of corny ornithology chatup lines and bish bosh she's bedded.
The invisible car was ridiculous, possibly only overtaken by the VR shots with Moneypenny.
On the plus side I loved the fencing scene, the attractive supporting cast, and the Ice Palace was an impressive backdrop.
:D
Post by: richierich on June 23, 2009, 12:38:51 AM
(http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/4060/1232medium.jpg)
They were crack troops skilled in the techniques of unconditional warfare, the soldiers of the Special Forces - and the focus of Hollywood's first feature film about the Vietnam War: 'The Green Berets'.
John Wayne stars in and co-directs this red-white-and-blue depiction of America's Vietnam effort, based on Robin Moore's novel. Wayne wrote to President Lyndon Johnson to request military assistance for the film - and got more than enough firepower to create an impressive spectacle.
Its soldiers fit the tried-and-true mold of earlier Wayne war classics like 'Back to Bataan' and 'Sands of Iwo Jima'. Their heroics are timeless.
Flag waving support for the Vietnam war, totally unrealistic, ignoring the true horrors of the conflict, with Wayne acting like this was a Western.
The battle scenes were impressively shot and intricate, but alas again childish in there portrayal that people die heroically with little fuss and bullets miss the good guys.
Heavy going, lacklustre casting, crap dialogue, overlong and way too political for my taste.
:-\
Post by: richierich on June 23, 2009, 11:47:17 PM
(http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/9287/3126medium.jpg)
Drew Barrymore plays Charlie McGhee, a pre-pubescent girl whose moods of anger and frustration are manifested in the telekinetic creation of raging fires. Her parents participated in dangerous government experiments in the 1960s, and their bodies were altered in ways that affected the physical and mental makeup of their child. Now the CIA wants to harness Charlie's powers and use them as weapons of destruction. They successfully kidnap her, but can they contain her fears and blistering rage
Extremly dated, but a reasonable adaptation sticking fairly close to the book.
Barrymore shows early class, and the support cast inclusive of Scott and Sheen work well together.
The low budget effects and at times splintered dialogue though keeps this movie below average and at times boring.
:-\
Post by: richierich on July 05, 2009, 09:16:37 PM
(http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/7584/128654medium.jpg)
Power couple Angela (Heather Graham) and Curtis (Jerry O'Connell) have a seemingly flawless marriage, but a surprise pregnancy could end up turning their carefully ordered world upside down in this riotous rollercoaster of a romantic comedy. Between their know-it-all best friends (John Corbett and Katie Finneran) and Angela's task-master boss (Lara Flynn Boyle), the perfect pair could end up imploding before the bundle of joy's even born.
Unoriginal, unfunny, unpleasant and unappetising.
Tired old predictable story, a cast that should have known better, and so poorly scripted it did not raise one laugh from me during the whole movie.
Avoid this, even if it soon finds its way into the bargain bins.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on July 05, 2009, 09:30:43 PM
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/6800/97845medium.jpg)
Steve Martin returns to the scene of the fun as the brilliant, bumbling Inspector Jacques Clouseau in this side-splitting slapstick comedy for the whole family! When legendary treasures from around the world are stolen, including the priceless Pink Panther diamond, Clouseau is assigned to a dream team of international detectives who are under pressure to bring the master thief to justice before he strikes again. Co-starring Jean Reno, Alfred Molina, Andy Garcia, Lily Tomlin and John Cleese, The Pink Panther 2 will steal your heart...and keep you laughing!
Martin has a slightly better 2nd attempt at Clouseau, but is still at a French snails pace in comparison to Sellers. One would of hoped he had learned with the first film, and his disasterous attempt at Bilko.
It is so ridiculous in parts you cannot help laughing, but overall it is slightly embarrassing to view this pathetic offering.
John Cleese for some reason appears as Clouseaus boss, but he plays the part as Basil Fawlty and this makes no sense at all and does not work.
Wait to watch this one on telly one day you are bored.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on July 05, 2009, 09:41:34 PM
(http://img403.imageshack.us/img403/5669/55800medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winner Jodie Foster (Best Actress, The Silence Of The Lambs, 1991) gives an outstanding performance in the heart-pumping action thriller Flightplan. Flying at 40,000 feet in a state-of-the-art aircraft that she helped design, Kyle Pratt's (Foster) six-year-old daughter Julia vanishes without a trace. Or did she? No one on the plane believes Julia was ever onboard. And now Kyle, desperate and alone, can only count on her own wits to unravel the mystery and save her daughter. From the producer of Apollo 13 and A Beautiful Mind, Flightplan is an intense, suspense-filled thriller that will keep you on the edge of your seat the entire flight.
Enjoyed watching this film again, Jodie Foster seldom disappoints and the action and suspense of the film was smoothly produced.
Skarrsgard and Bean support well, in a movie set almost entirely on a seemingly huge jumbo jet. It delivers the 'guess who the baddie is' right to the last 20 minutes, and you can't help thinking 'what if' for those who fly regularly.
The extras 'making of' detailing the planes construction and the camera angles used etc was fascinating.
A must have in dvd.
;D
Post by: richierich on July 05, 2009, 10:03:51 PM
(http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/433/7244medium.jpg)
They are the unidentified victims of an unsolved death spree, women linked by a killer's gruesome handiwork...and by police files giving them the code name "Jennifer." Homicide investigator John Berlin believes he's made a breakthrough in the case when he uncovers a key witness: a young blind woman named Helena. Yet who can rely on the testimony of a witness who cannot see? Who can trust Berlin when he is ultimately suspected of the murders? And who can keep vulnerable Helena from becoming the next Jennifer?
Andy Garcia (Hero) portrays Berlin and Uma Thurman (Final Analysis) is Helena in this tightly coiled mystery costarring John Malkovich, Lance Henriksen and Kathy Baker. With top stars, top suspense and a surprise ending, it's no surprise "Jennifer 8 is a 10!" (Bill Diehl, ABC Radio Network).
Atmospheric and tense, a great cast is well directed in this excellent suspenseful thriller.
Awash with red herrings, this whodunnit gives Garcia a platform to truly impress, unlike the last few movies I've seen him in. It does stray a little bit with too many coincidences, but nevertheless still holds firm leading up to the final conclusion and some good scenes between Garcia and Malkovich.
Underrated and relatively unknown remake, it is worth a viewing.
;D
Post by: richierich on July 05, 2009, 10:11:29 PM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/6071/1731medium.jpg)
Robert De Niro stars with Jodie Foster, Cybill Shepherd, Harvey Keitel, Peter Boyle and Albert Brooks in the all-too-real story of a psychotic New York cabby who is driven to violence in an attempt to rescue a teenage prostitute.
Intense movie starring a young DeNiro as a menacing insomniac taxi driver whose life slowly unfolds, and unravels, on a self believed righteous and heroic path to kill a senator and save a child prostitute.
His portrayal of a lonely, at times desperate, disengaged and rejected member of society is convincing, and the bloody climax is brutal, graphic and shocking.
You Talking to me?
Top drawer with a great script from Schrader, masterful Scorsese direction, and a support cast including Keitel, Shepherd and Foster.
Treat yourself.
;D
Post by: richierich on July 06, 2009, 09:37:27 PM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/5195/108332medium.jpg)
In 1958, as part of the dedication ceremony for a new elementary school, a group of students is asked to draw pictures to be stored in a time capsule but one mysterious girl fills her sheet of paper with rows of apparently random numbers instead. Fifty years later, Professor John Koestler (Nicolas Cage) makes the startling discovery that the encoded message predicts every major disaster of the past 50 years. As John further unravels the document's chilling secrets, he realizes the document foretells three additional events - the last of which hints at destruction on a global scale and seems to somehow involve John and his son.
Excellent idea for a film, and the first hour or so was enough to convince me I should exchange this for blu-ray. Unfortunately the Hollywood disease hit it at this point, and it disappeared down the toilet with too typical mushiness and far-fetched ending to spoil the whole movie.
The action scenes are spectacular, great attention to detail, dramatic realistic crashes (subway and plane), the fast paced action is fairly breathless once it gets into it's stride, and the production excellent.
However what will totally deflate the viewer is the out of context ghost story that develops, and the bullshit ending that was way too out there, bunnies and all!
Fell into the rail just before cleaning up the pins!
:D
Post by: Jimmy on July 06, 2009, 10:39:30 PM
Taxi DriverDid you get an impression of "deja vue" while watching Rich?
(http://img31.picoodle.com/img/img31/2/7/6/aesp_pres/f_Clipboard01m_1854db9.jpg)
Sometime Sweet Susan review (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,695.msg87125.html#msg87125)
Post by: richierich on July 06, 2009, 11:18:26 PM
Taxi DriverDid you get an impression of "deja vue" while watching Rich?
Sometime Sweet Susan review (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,695.msg87125.html#msg87125)
You know it was bugging me where I had seen that title before - I should have known :laugh: :clap:
Post by: Achim on July 07, 2009, 06:26:31 AM
His portrayal of a lonely, at times desperate, disengaged and rejected member of society is convincing, and the bloody climax is brutal, graphic and shocking.On the DVD release I have there is an excellent feature by Laurent Bouzerount(sp? :bag:), who else, and I believe the DoP mentioned that the colors of that scene have always been of and everything should have looked even more bloody than it already does. He was hoping they'd find a better source one day to restore it to the intended state. (maybe even some shots are missing...)
However, Taxi Driver is indeed a great film.
Post by: richierich on July 08, 2009, 10:23:33 AM
(http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/9913/106654medium.jpg)
Remember that really cute guy who said he'd call...and didn't? Maybe he lost your number. Maybe he's in the hospital. Maybe he's awed by your beauty, brains or success. Or maybe He's Just Not That into You. An all-star cast — Ben Afleck, Jennifer Aniston, Drew Barrymore, Jennifer Connelly, Kevin Connolly, Bradley Cooper, Ginnifer Goodwin, Scarlett Johansson and Justin Long – looks for love and finds laughs in this savvy, sexy, right-now romcom. Based on the runaway (like some guys you know) bestseller by Sex and the City series writers Greg Behrendt and Liz Tuccillo, He's Just Not That into You sparkles with zingy aha moments any survivor of the dating wars will recognize. See it with someone you'd like to love.
Brainless romcom that misses the mark in every department. Tedious and dull, it is basically a movie about a herd of desperate whining women bemoaning men and there ways. Are there really such naive and narrow minded people still in existence?
Too few laughs and up moments, overall a depressing view of love and dating in USA, one to avoid.
:-\
Post by: Najemikon on July 08, 2009, 07:12:31 PM
Fell into the rail just before cleaning up the pins!
:D
Love that sign-off! :laugh:
Post by: richierich on July 09, 2009, 10:59:53 AM
(http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/1598/5430024m.jpg)
Liam Neeson stars in this action-packed international thriller that will have you on the edge of your seat from start to finish. When his estranged daughter is kidnapped in Paris, a former spy (Neeson) sets out to find her at any cost. Relying on his special skills, he tracks down the ruthless gang that abducted her and launches a one-man war to bring them to justice and rescue his daughter.
After reading good reviews here I purchased this, and was not disappointed. It is a top notch action-thriller, full of pace and punch, delivered straight into your face. It is a surprise it was so underhyped by the studio?
The leading role is seemingly crafted for Liam Neeson, and he is totally convincing playing the father hell bent on rescuing his daughter from sex slave traders. Seldom does he appear in bad films, clearly fortunate to be able to select the best scripts/roles. Perhaps a future Bond?
Although there is a major amount of violence, it is never too OTT, and the production values and pacy plot make it addictive edge of the seat viewing.
Close enough to Bourne standards to be cousins.
:thumbup:
Post by: goodguy on July 09, 2009, 05:00:48 PM
Taken
...
After reading good reviews here...
Not from me (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,3213.msg90266.html#msg90266). ;)
It is a surprise it was so underhyped by the studio?
Was it? At least here in Germany, I remember seeing the trailer everywhere, even on the subway.
Post by: richierich on July 27, 2009, 05:12:03 PM
(http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5107/105601medium.jpg)
Someone’s killing our super heroes. The year is 1985 and super heroes have banded together to respond to the murder of one of their own. They soon uncover a sinister plot that puts all of humanity in grave danger. The super heroes fight to stop the impending doom only to find themselves a target for annihilation. But, if our super heroes are gone, who will save us?
A superhero movie for adults, sadly missed the mark for me but I am finding it difficult to ascertain exactly why this is the case. It is way too long, and I continually lost interest and found myself willing it to speed up and give me more action. It is ponderously slow, and at several points drawn out scenes accompanied usually by various 60 and 70's music were unnecessary. Some very cheesy sex scenes just did not fit into the film, and the whole script was quite complicated for someone like myself who knew nothing about the history and past of The Watchmen.
I will watch this again to see if it makes more sense, but on first viewing it was a disappointment.
:-\
Post by: Achim on July 28, 2009, 11:17:07 AM
Did you watch the theatrical or the director's cut?
Post by: richierich on July 28, 2009, 02:59:27 PM
I watched the theatrical version.
Did you see it in the cinema, and if so how was it received by the audience? The first 5 or 6 minutes with Bob Dylan music in background was brilliant, but it slowly went downhill for me after that.
Post by: Achim on July 28, 2009, 05:58:58 PM
I passed on the current Director's Cut in favor of the upcoming 5-disc Ultimate Edition. I may miss a few of the4 special features from the current release, but I don't want to double-dip.
Post by: Najemikon on July 28, 2009, 06:15:29 PM
Yes I have since read up on the movie and learnt the director has produced literally a carbon copy of the original comic. It may be a 'grower', so I will watch it again later this year and hope I enjoy it more. :hmmmm:
I watched the theatrical version.
Did you see it in the cinema, and if so how was it received by the audience? The first 5 or 6 minutes with Bob Dylan music in background was brilliant, but it slowly went downhill for me after that.
Why bother watching it again so soon? If you think the story appeals, man up and buy the comic! Then you have the proper version, with the Tales of the Black Freighter in the right place, rather than a separate money grabbing disc.
Although, I haven't seen it yet and still fancy a look, but the US version seems a better buy as the DC isn't available in the UK yet? Sounds like another attempt to rip us off... :redcard:
Post by: Tom on July 28, 2009, 06:20:26 PM
Sounds like another attempt to rip us off... :redcard:
The problem is, that in the US Warner Bros. has the distribution rights, and in Europe it is Paramount. And Paramount is not known for releasing a decent first release, if there is money to be made later on with follow-up releases (see Star Trek movies).
Post by: richierich on July 29, 2009, 10:01:07 AM
(http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/6760/115206medium.jpg)
Above shadowy, crime-infested streets a masked avenger watches. Denny Colt (Gabriel Macht) was once Central City's finest cop until a gangster's bullet ended his life. Now Fate has brought him back from the beyond as The Spirit, a street-hardened hero who faces off against seductive foes like the voluptuous Sand Saref (Eva Mendes) or the alluring Silken Floss (Scarlett Johansson) in this graphic action-thriller.
Once you get past the wow factor of stunning cinematography, slick design, delightful backdrops and gorgeous cast, the storyline is very flat and hollow, and overall the film tails away into a forgetful mess.
This lacks the substance of Sin City and 300, and clearly Miller directing alone has cost the movie in lack of characterisation, acting direction, and sadly creates a feeling of blandness.
I'd seriously recommend not buying this disappointing dvd.
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on July 30, 2009, 12:57:44 AM
(http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3044/99119medium.jpg)
Interpol agent Louis Salinger (Clive Owen) is determined to expose an arms dealing ring responsible for facilitating acts of terrorism around the globe. But as his investigation leads Salinger and his partner, Manhattan Assistant District Attorney Eleanor Whitman (Naomi Watts), deeper into the secret world of greed, corruption and murder, they become targets of a deadly conspiracy so vast, they soon find the only people left to trust are each other. This pulse-pounding thriller plays a high-stakes game of suspense, intrigue and explosive action.
Despite reading bad reviews on this movie, personally I found it an above average adventure thriller, reasonably cast, and generally well plotted through the film. Pretty good escapist stuff for adults, with the storyline centering around high finance, arms dealing and dodgy banks.
The locations are variously spread around Europe and the US, and were interesting in there originality and architectural impact.
A particular high point in the action was the shoot-out at the Guggenheim which was spectacular, very well directed and tensely shot.
This is no show stopper, but well worth the money.
:D
Post by: Dragonfire on July 30, 2009, 06:29:00 AM
Yes, I saw it in the cinema. Not sure how representative a Taiwanese audience is for that a western-oriented film, but t was basically well received. I found that it had its slow moments in the middle but enjoyed the second half.
I passed on the current Director's Cut in favor of the upcoming 5-disc Ultimate Edition. I may miss a few of the4 special features from the current release, but I don't want to double-dip.
I didn't realize before I got my copy about the 5-disc Ultimate Edition. I don't know if I'll get it yet or not. I'll see.
And I did get the graphic novel after I saw the movie.
Post by: richierich on July 30, 2009, 10:33:08 AM
(http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/2128/101994medium.jpg)
Daniel Craig (James Bond: The Quantum of Solace) stars as Tuvia Bielski, an ordinary citizen turned hero, in this action-packed epic of family, honor, vengeance and salvation. Defiance is a riveting adventure that showcases the extraordinary true story of the Bielski brothers, simple farmers - outnumbered and outgunned - who turned a group of war refugees into powerful freedom fighters. Tuvia, along with his unyielding brother, Zus (Liev Schreiber, X-Men Origins: Wolverine), motivate hundreds of civilians to join their ranks against the Nazi regime. Their "Inspirational story" (David Densby, The New Yorker) is a true testament to the human spirit.
Humbling feel good true story movie, for once not spoilt by Hollywood glamourising, delivers stunning cinematography, haunting soundtrack and amazing shoot locations. Craig works surprisingly well in his lead role of the courageous Tuvia Bielski, but for me the shine-out star was Liev Schreiber, an actor I have never really warmed to perhaps because of his Scream appearances, but here in his part of Tuvias' brother Zus, I found his performance outstanding.
The atmosphere works well, with dialogue intermixing between German, English and Russian, and the drama, action, human interest and love aspects are all finely sculpted together. Some may find the pace gets a bit clumsy at times, but it did not overall detract from my enjoyment.
Story-telling of the highest quality, with the ending of course updating the viewer on what happened to the many survivors after the war. Uplifting and recommended.
;D
Post by: Achim on July 31, 2009, 09:36:43 AM
I didn't realize before I got my copy about the 5-disc Ultimate Edition. I don't know if I'll get it yet or not. I'll see.I did read a few reviews before buying (since I was waiting for the DeepDiscount sale) and same pointed out at the very beginning that the Director's Cut included a coupon for the Ultimate; I believe $10 off or something like that. I still weighed options for a while and then decided to wait.
The Ultimate will have the Extended Director's Cut, with the Tales of the Black Freighter edited in and one of the discs will be the Full Motion comic; for those who want to read the comic but are too lazy to, well, simply read the book (ity had good reviews though, when it came out). I guess one disc may be either the soundtrack or another digital copy and then the other two are open for our guessing.
Post by: richierich on July 31, 2009, 10:32:03 AM
(http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/8707/105584medium.jpg)
Academy Award® nominee Leonardo DiCaprio* and Academy Award® winner Kate Winslet** reunite for two powerful, groundbreaking performances in Revolutionary Road. Based on the bestseller by Richard Yates and directed by Academy Award® winner Sam Mendes***, this mesmerizing and moving story follows the lives of a passionate young couple living in suburban Connecticut who decide to risk everything to pursue their dreams. They're willing to break away from the ordinary – but can they do it without breaking apart? Nominated for 3† Academy Awards® and acclaimed by critics, Revolutionary Road is hailed as "one of the best films of the year." (Roger Ebert, CHICAGO SUN-TIMES)
Pass the mallet Jon!!!
Self-indulgent, hollow, pointless, without substance or purpose - this movie is crap.
With a return to an American Beauty like subject matter for Mendes, the whole feel of the film was dated and unoriginal. The characters are clichéd, and despite solid cinematography and reasonable performances, the lack of punch or any interesting storyline made this a real stinker. I finished this film feeling bored and slightly depressed, having watched a miserable tale of 2 chain smoking argumentative 50's wannabees.
:yawn:
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: richierich on July 31, 2009, 10:40:59 PM
(http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/3735/27852medium.jpg)
From acclaimed writer Charlie Kaufman and visionary director Michel Gondry comes Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. An all-star ensemble cast shines in this comical and poignant look at breakups, breakdowns and breakthroughs.
Joel (Jim Carrey) is stunned to discover that his girlfriend, Clementine (Kate Winslet), has had their tumultous relationship erased from her mind. Out of desperation, he contacts the inventor of the process, Dr. Howard Mierzwiak (Tom Wilkinson), to get the same treatment. But as his memories of Clementine begin to fade, Joel suddenly realizes how much he still loves her.
Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo and Elijah Wood co-star in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind – a memorable film that The Wall Street Journal calls "a romantic comedy unlike any other!"
Probably better watched a bit stoned or half cut, this was a peculiar movie but with superb characters and a very original storyline. It took a lot of concentration to cope with the many twists and turns, but the reward is a heart warming love story supported by excellent direction and sympathetic soundtrack.
The quirkiness may not appeal to everyone, but the performances out of normal type for Carrey and Winslet were refreshing and successful, and should be appreciated by all. The journey with the main character this movie takes you on is both exhilirating and depressing, and I expect may be even more revealing on a second viewing.
I will eek out some more Charlie Kaufman films as I have enjoyed both I have seen so far.
:D
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: Najemikon on July 31, 2009, 10:56:52 PM
Revolutionary Road
(http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/8707/105584medium.jpg)
Pass the mallet Jon!!!
:hysterical:
With pleasure! I was never sure about Revolutionary Road. Certainly doesn't sound like my cup of tea. Your description reminds me of the old melodramas like Cat On A Hot Tin Roof and A Streetcar Named Desire. I hate that sort of thing where characters just seem to beat around the bush for two hours and don't get anywhere.
Post by: richierich on August 01, 2009, 12:13:17 AM
(http://img376.imageshack.us/img376/6099/63828medium.jpg)
See and hear the fearless Kate Winslet as you never have before in this down and dirty savage musical from Director John Turturro and Executive Producers Joel & Ethan Coen - creators of "The Big Lebowski" and "O Brother, Where Art Thou?"
Nick Murder (James Gandolfini) is a man torn between 2 women - his long suffering wife Kitty (Susan Sarandon) and the flame-haired, foul-mouthed seductress Tula (kate Winslet), who really knows how to flick his switch. With faith in her husband shattered, Kitty surprises even herself with the ferocity of her anger as she struggles to cope with his betrayal. It is only through a tragic twist of fate that Nick finally understands the extent of the pain he has inflicted on his family.
Employing a fabulously eclectic mix of contemporary and classic songs, and featuring such diverse artists as James Brown, Nick Cave, Bruce Springsteen, ROMANCE & CIGARETTES is a unique tale of sex and mortality that features an all-star cast.
Musical, comedy, romance, drama - sounds like it will be awful right?
Wrong.
It was absolutely superb viewing, totally entertaining and if like me you see the genre MUSICAL and shy away, I urge you strongly to try this as it is original and compulsive watching pleasure. Incredibly witty dialogue, superbly and star studded casting, music mixed from so many genres and eras but totally works.
Kate Winslet is like you have never seen or heard before, a foul mouthed lingerie selling slut, and 1st rate performances from Gandolfini, Sarandon, Buscemi etc etc etc make this a stand out movie. Raunchy and raw, this film dares to be different and was a joy.
;D
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: goodguy on August 01, 2009, 01:13:11 AM
Revolutionary Road
...
Self-indulgent, hollow, pointless, without substance or purpose - this movie is crap.
I could have sworn I've already read a positive review about it from you (along the lines of "beautiful downer"). But not only is that obviously wrong, there also isn't a review from anyone else here. Strange, strange. Anyway, I liked it a lot and don't get the "hollow, pointless" verdict, but unfortunately don't have the time to get into a more substantial argument. Sorry.
Romance And Cigarettes
I'm very curious what you think of this. One of my favorite movies (top ten, seriously).
Post by: richierich on August 01, 2009, 01:34:16 AM
Nope not me, and we will have to agree to disagree on this one, I would never be convinced it was anything other than boring :surrender:Revolutionary Road
...
Self-indulgent, hollow, pointless, without substance or purpose - this movie is crap.
I could have sworn I've already read a positive review about it from you (along the lines of "beautiful downer"). But not only is that obviously wrong, there also isn't a review from anyone else here. Strange, strange. Anyway, I liked it a lot and don't get the "hollow, pointless" verdict, but unfortunately don't have the time to get into a more substantial argument. Sorry.
Romance And Cigarettes
I'm very curious what you think of this. One of my favorite movies (top ten, seriously).
We can agree on this one - see review - I loved it :cheers:
Post by: richierich on August 01, 2009, 01:48:10 AM
(http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/1456/81845medium.jpg)
Life is not quite what it seems in this haunting and sensual masterwork from Academy Award®-nominated writer/director Todd Field ('In The Bedroom'). Oscar® nominees Kate Winslet and Jackie Earle Haley star along with Oscar® winner Jennifer Connelly and Patrick Wilson in this "beautiful, provocative and compelling" (Michael Phillips, 'Chicago Tribune') adult drama. Based on the novel by Tom Perrota, "this film pulls you in like a magnetic force" (Peter Travers, 'Rolling Stone') as it explores how the lives of seemingly perfect families can unravel in the wake of an adulterous affair.
Pleasant, sensitive and funny, this tale is wonderfully told and ably acted. The diverse mixture of intriguing characters, all with their own secrets, makes the viewing compelling and despite a pretty OTT excessive ending, the journey enjoyable.
The most interesting characters for me were not the main leads, it was the relationship between a recently released peodophile and an ex-cop with some form of personal vendetta. With the excellent portrayal by Haley, you actually find yourself sympathising with this disturbed monster.
On the negative, the film is plagued by a narrator, who in the beginning excessively talks over the action. It was a strange concept, as he just told us what we had seen, and basically provided an idiots guide in case the audience was too stupid to grasp it. For me this doesn't work.
But overall the cast and superb direction do this film justice, and it was a very good watch.
:D
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: Najemikon on August 01, 2009, 02:45:46 AM
Post by: richierich on August 02, 2009, 03:30:31 PM
(http://img518.imageshack.us/img518/7058/63175medium.jpg)
Martin Sweet (Ray Winstone) is from the poorer East End Of London and now runs a successful, exclusive menswear shop in a wealthier part of the city. He has everything he wants, a beautiful wife (Carol Harrison), two daughters being educated at an expensive school, a luxurious house outside London, a Rolls Royce and an enormous overdraft,
When the bank suddenly calls in its loans Martin is forced to sell everything and move with his wife and family back to the small and uncomfortable council flat where Martin and his elder brother (Larry Lamb) were brought up. To make matters worse he has to rent it from his mean and selfish father Bernie (John Bardon) who still feels free to come and go as he pleases. The girls now have to go to the local state school which cheers up the street-wise Joanna (Michelle Cattini) but horrifies the snobbish Eleanor (Kate Winslet).
Series from the early 90's in UK which I only saw a few random episodes, it basically introduced a number of future stars including Ray Winstone (although personally I always think Scum was his 1st major appearance) and my mini-marathon subject Kate Winslet. Having viewed the first few episodes, it was interesting to see the basis for the series, and especially the role of Winslet as a snobby schoolgirl. However the whole comedy aspect and production style felt very 80's, and would not attract me in a hurry to watch the rest of both series I own.
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 02, 2009, 03:48:56 PM
(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1975/14921medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winner* Kevin Spacey (American Beauty) stars with Oscar® nominee** Kate Winslet (Titanic) in a powerfully gripping, edge-of-your-seat thriller hailed as "provocative!" (ABC-TV). An electrifying, suspenseful journey into deadly conspiracy and murderous deception begins when a respected professor who may - or may not - be guilty is charged with a brutal crime. The Life of David Gale is a brilliantly unpredictable thriller, which builds relentlessly to a shocking final twist guaranteed to blow you away!
Having seen this in the cinema on release, it was a first viewing on DVD. It lost nothing for being on a smaller screen, and is a worthwhile addition to everyones collection.
The majority of main cast provide powerful performances, Spacey is at his absolute best and is at times warm and at others menacing, making you guess right through the film about his guilt or innocence. Winslet was weaker in this role, I wasn't totally convinced by her portrayal as a hard nosed investigative journalist.
The ending is predictable but nonetheless fitting, and it is one of those films that make you think long after the credits roll. The death penalty is always going to be subjective, but the question whether an innocent could be convicted and killed, whether by injustice or design, is admirably told by means of this thriller drama.
;D
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 02, 2009, 03:51:41 PM
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/6092/8401medium.jpg)
The powerful true story based on John Bayley's novels that earned Jim Broadbent (Moulin Rouge) an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor, Judi Dench (Shakespeare In Love) a BAFTA Award for Best Leading Actress and Kate Winslet (Titanic) an Academy Award Nomination for Best Supporting Actress.
Judi Dench and Kate Winslet bring to the screen one of the most extraordinary women of the 20th Century, celebrated English author Iris Murdoch. As told by her unlikely soulmate, husband John Bayley, Iris first became known as a brilliant young scholar at Oxford whose boundless spirit dazzled those around her. During a remarkable career as a novelist and philosopher, she continued to prove herself a woman ahead of her time. Even in later life, as age and illness robbed Iris of her remarkable gifts, nothing could diminish her immense influence or weaken the bond with her devoted husband.
Sensitive, moving and emotional classy movie from the UK, a film that portrays perhaps 2 of the best actors in recent history at their finest, Judi Dench and Jim Broadbent. If tears do not come to the viewer at many times in the 2nd half of this film, they must have concrete hearts. Based on the true story of Iris Murdoch, the movie captivates from start to finish, and tackles a really difficult subject of Alzheimers in a touching and focussed manner. The affectionate devoted relationship between the 2 is heart-warming, and the wonderful way the director switches between the young couple and then the old, makes you feel totally part of the story and understanding the frightening confusion and desperation that hits Iris.
Painfully honest portrayal of not just a celebrity, but a frightening illness. Please buy it.
:thumbup:
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 02, 2009, 04:09:49 PM
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/4194/3856medium.jpg)
SENSE AND SENSIBILITY is the story of two sisters; pragmatic Elinor (EMMA THOMPSON) and passionate, wilful Marianne (KATE WINSLET).
When their father, Henry Dashwood, dies, by law his estate must pass to the eldest son from his first marriage. Suddenly homeless and impoverished, his current wife and daughters find themselves living in a simple country cottage.
The two sisters are soon accepted into their new society. Marianne becomes swept up in a passionate love affair with the dashing Willoughby (GREG WISE), while Elinor struggles to keep a tight rein on the family purse strings and to keep her feelings for Edward Ferrars (HUGH GRANT), whom she left behind, hidden from her family. Despite their different personalities, they both experience great sorrow in their affairs, but they learn to mix sense with sensibility in a society that is obsessed with both financial and social status.
Despite being generally uninterested in the period drama, with a British cast of such high calibre, and wonderfully written by Emma Thompson, I found this movie gently absorbing and very watchable.
Sadly Thompson was too old for the role she wrote for herself, but Winslet was perfect along with great performances from Rickman, Spriggs and Grant in particular. The locations, costumes and sets are attractive, and despite a slow pace the clever dialogue and warm touch are enticing.
Funny, fresh and romantic, with a score to lull you into a good mood, this film was an enjoyable surprise.
:D
** Kate Winslet mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7020/katewinsletm.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 03, 2009, 12:31:26 AM
(http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/1025/39748medium.jpg)
Imagine if one day, out of the blue, your wildest dreams came true! That's exactly what happens to junior executive Larry Burrows (James Belushi - 'Taking Care Of Business') when he bumps into a mysterious stranger (Michael Caine - 'Miss Congeniality', 'The Cider House Rules'). Instantly, Larry's ho-hum life becomes his ultimate fantasy - huge mansion, beautiful wife, cars galore! But before long, his new lifestyle isn't so enchanting. Ultimately, Larry discovers it's going to take a lot more than wishful thinking to get back to where he once belonged! Co-starring 'Terminator 2's' Linda Hamilton and comedian Jon Lovitz ('Little Nicky', 'Rat Race'), 'Mr. Destiny' is a delightful rags-to-riches comedy brimming with totally magical entertainment!
Drippy Disney-like family movie, low on laughs and high on clichés.
Belushi does not bring any magic to the part with his wooden acting, and average performances from Caine, Russo and Hamilton do not improve matters. The ending is unsatisfying, and the whole film immediately drifts out of your consciousness and is wholly unremarkable and unmemorable.
Courteney Cox has a minor role as a spurned mistress, which she carries off well.
:-\
** Courteney Cox mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7064/courtneycox150.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 03, 2009, 10:10:17 AM
(http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/4952/80017medium.jpg)
What really happens on the farm when the farmer isn't looking? In director Steve Oedekerk's (KUNG POW: ENTER THE FIST, ACE VENTURA: WHEN NATURE CALLS) computer-generated animation feature, the farm animals can do everything humans do. They talk, walk upright, buy human contraband from a 'grey market' run by the gophers, and even turn the barn into a nightclub. Of course, they do all of this in secret. The biggest party animal is Otis (voiced by Kevin James), a happy-go-lucky cow who's always up for a crazy stunt or practical joke (bizarrely, the movie is full of male cows with udders). But Otis' carefree attitude doesn't sit too well with his father, Ben (Sam Neill), the barnyard patriarch and protector. While he loves his slacker son, Ben thinks that Otis needs to learn some responsibility if he is to continue his legacy. When the dangerous coyote season arrives and Ben is no longer able to serve as barnyard security, mayhem ensues and the farm starts to resemble an amusement park. Alas, Otis is still too immature to take the lead, preferring instead to woo bovine beauty Daisy (Courtney Cox) and party with his friends. But when push comes to shove, will Otis stand up to the coyotes and protect the barnyard, or will he turn the udder cheek? This coming-of-age tale is bolstered by the human antics of the animals and genuine laugh-out-loud moments for all ages. Wanda Sykes voices Bessy, Daisy's cynical cow friend, and Danny Glover voices Miles the Mule, a sage elder on the farm. Songs by Tom Petty and Peter Gabriel, as well as other artists, elevate the soundtrack above typical children's fare.
Certainly not the best animated film of this ilk, but by no means the worst. Many of the characters were very amusing, but the storyline would be banal even for a small child watching this. The number of laugh out loud moments are too few, and there is nothing groundbreaking in the animation or technique.
Just couldn't work out why the male cows had udders - is it a special breed??? Courteney Cox charater is unremarkable and pretty boring, the best was definately Freddy the Ferret (voiced by Cam Clarke).
:D
** Courteney Cox mini-marathon
(http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/7064/courtneycox150.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 03, 2009, 10:50:14 PM
(http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6171/70934medium.jpg)
In the great tradition of witty New York romantic comedies, David Duchovny and Julianne Moore star in this "sexy and sophisticated" (KBWB-TV) ensemble film about life, love and laughter in the big city. Overachieving actress, Rebecca (Moore), must come to grips with her failing marriage to stay-at-home dad, Tom (Duchovny). While Rebecca's slacker brother, Tobey (Billy Crudup), can't seem to commit to his aspiring-novelist girlfriend, Elaine (Maggie Gyllenhaal). As both relationships spin out of control, the two couples embark on a hilarious quest to rediscover the magic and romance of falling in love in New York.
Dire romcom of the worst order, ending up not being funny or romantic.
The majority of cast look like they have sussed how crap the script is, and want a hasty exit from this disaster, and there is not one performance of note. There is no characterisation, after an hour and a half I do not know or understand any of the 4 main leads anymore than I did during the opening credits, and there is not an ounce of chemistry between any personalities. The direction is desperate, whenever the movie tried to be serious it felt forced and false, when it was attempting to be romantic it felt pretentious.
Mediocre and rightly overlooked.
:yawn:
**Eva Mendes mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/9927/evamendessmile150x150.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 04, 2009, 01:26:27 AM
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/1261/4686medium.jpg)
The making of a horror movie takes on a terrifying reality for students at the most prestigious film school in the country in URBAN LEGENDS: FINAL CUT, the suspenseful follow-up to the smash hit URBAN LEGEND.
At Alpine University, someone is determined to win the best film award at any cost - - even if it means eliminating the competition. No one is safe and everyone is a suspect. URBAN LEGENDS: FINAL CUT is an edge-of-your-seat thriller that will keep you guessing until the shocking climax. Starring Jennifer Morrison (STIR OF ECHOES), Matthew Davis (TIGERLAND), Joseph Lawrence (TV's Blossom), Anthony Anderson (ME, MYSELF & IRENE) Hart Bochner (DIE HARD) and Loretta Devine (from the original URBAN LEGEND).
Poorly executed horror slash film, little suspense and predictable storyline and outcome.
Not a patch on the first film, this uninspiring sequel was clearly designed to cash in on the dvd sales, but sadly with it's young cast it does not reach expectations. It is generally a corny, boring plot and the humour, horror, gore etc are all second rate. Not quite sure after the first murder what the Urban Legends were?
Much better alternatives in this genre to choose from.
:yawn:
**Eva Mendes mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/9927/evamendessmile150x150.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 05, 2009, 10:23:08 AM
(http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/8149/20118medium.jpg)
Leaping back into action, gun-slinging, guitar-toting hero "El Mariachi" is back in town in ONCE UPON A TIME IN MEXICO, as director Robert Rodriguez delivers the epic final chapter of his pulp Western trilogy. Starring Antonio Banderas, Salma Hayek, Johnny Depp, Mickey Rourke, Eva Mendes, Enrique Iglesias and Willem Dafoe, ONCE UPON A TIME IN MEXICO is a full-frontal assault.
Banderas reprises his role and is excellent as the brooding and intense guitar playing hitman, but as with many films Depp steals the movie playing the psycho FBI agent delivering classic lines and generally exercising his acting craft at a level above all others in this flick. Being like the other Mariachi films there is little substance to the plot, but what you do get is a slickly directed and produced action film rich in set pieces, amusing one-liners and blood aplenty. Mendes, Iglesias and Hayek provide eye candy for both sexes, and they work well as support to the 2 leads.
With a script all over the place, it was difficult to ascertain where the film was heading, and despite being of lesser quality than the first 2 films this still remained watchable.
:D
**Eva Mendes mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/9927/evamendessmile150x150.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 05, 2009, 10:30:51 AM
(http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/1305/107079medium.jpg)
Fasten your seatbelts for the thrill ride of your life in Disney's fun family action-adventure - RACE TO WITCH MOUNTAIN, starring Dwayne Johnson. Jack Bruno (Johnson), a Las Vegas cabdriver struggling to stay on the right path, gets an out-of-this-world incentive when two aliens, disguised as teenagers, suddenly appear in his taxi. In a race against government agents, an alien hunter and time itself, Jack must help the children recover their lost spaceship so they can return home and save their planet and ours. Breathtaking chases, close calls and special effects make this an action-adventure the whole family will enjoy.
Bearing in mind the audience age this movie was primarily made for, it is a fun adventure with amazing special effects, and ticks the boxes for most youngsters desires from an action movie. Johnsons gags are entertaining, and to be fair he doesn't do a bad job in this movie. Gugino appears as sweet as ever, and the pace of the film is non-stop.
Surprisingly a good family movie that should entertain all.
:D
**Carla Gugino mini-marathon
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/9708/facecarlagugino.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 06, 2009, 10:53:46 AM
(http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/9467/13876medium.jpg)
For Toby Wolff and his divorced mom Caroline, 1950s life wasn't all fun and games. These two free spirits and cross-country travellers settle in the Pacific Northwest, where life will be better. They hope.
This Boy's Life, the Wolffs' true story, "is every boy's life," the Los Angeles Times' Kenneth Turan wrote. The dynamic teaming of Robert De Niro (Analyze This, Meet the Parents), Ellen Barkin (The Big Easy, Sea of Love) and Leonardo DiCaprio (Titanic, Gangs of New York) sparks this funny, touching slice-of-life drama that pits rebellious teen Toby (DiCaprio) against his tyrannical new stepfather Dwight (De Niro). Directed by Michael Caton-Jones (Memphis Belle, City by the Sea), This Boy's Life is one to remember.
What a tremendous feeling to discover a film in your collection that you continually overlook, to finally view it, and find it is an absolute corker.
Hats off to DiCaprio as this movie shows his true talent as an actor, he actually outshines DeNiro which one can rarely say.
The film itself is a true story, is very moving and at times totally shocking. DeNiro as Dwight the stepfather who bullied and mentally tortured the boy, mostly away from others eyes and ears, is frighteningly menacing and you thoroughly hate this character by the end of the film. Barkin as the desperate mother looking for a normal man is superb, and you ache for her happiness. All of the supporting cast do a great job, Blechman in particular as Tobys friend is a great character.
A frightening depiction of 'family' life that still goes on today, is raised above the average stakes by DiCaprios amazing and moving performance. The fight scene in the kitchen between stepfather and Toby will stay in my mind for a long time. A gem of a dvd to own.
:thumbup:
**Carla Gugino mini-marathon
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/9708/facecarlagugino.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 06, 2009, 10:59:34 AM
(http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/4884/5279medium.jpg)
Bursting with an awesome array of ultracool high-tech gadgetry, Spy Kids delivers enough thrilling entertainment to satisfy the entire family! Nine years ago, top international spies Gregorio and Ingrid Cortez (Antonio Banderas and Carla Gugino) traded the excitement of espionage for the adventure of parenthood! But when they are called out on a secret mission, the Cortezes are separated from their family and kidnapped by the evil Fegan Floop. Fortunately, there are two people who possess the skills and know-how to reunite the family: Carmen and Juni Cortez, their kids! Your family will love every fun-filled second as Carmen and Juni bravely crisscross the globe in a thrilling quest to save their parents. All the while, they discover that keeping the family together is the most important mission in the world for kids and parents alike!
Entertaining and fun movie, well paced, imaginative and with reasonable effects, and gladly not too preaching in its message. Banderas and Gugino are well cast, but personally I found both kids to be too bratty and 'Hollywood' schooled. Some good cameo appearances to spot, interesting character for Alan Cumming, and some original ideas around the villains.
Altogether an enjoyable viewing.
:D
**Carla Gugino mini-marathon
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/9708/facecarlagugino.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 07, 2009, 02:19:36 PM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/6864/11266medium.jpg)
The coolest SPYkids anywhere are back for a huge new adventure! This time, Carmen and Juni are on a mission to recover a device that threatens the entire world! They enlist the skills of Mom and Dad (Carla Gugino and Antonio Banderas) - and even their SPY grandparents (Holland Taylor and Ricardo Montalban) - in a thrilling show of family teamwork! With even more cool gadgets, imaginative creatures and awesome special effects...it's nonstop high-tech adventure for everyone!
Rarely does a sequel meet expectations after a good first film, but the 2nd instalment of spy kids actually surpasses the original. With the most bizarre gadgets, imaginative scenarios - from a fantastic amusement park at the beginning, sword fight with skeletons, and to the mini zoos and morphed animals nearer the finale. The special effects are better portrayed on film than the 1st, and again it is spot the star as cameos regularly pop up in minor roles during the movie. The acting bearing in mind 3/4 of the time is being done by children is not too trashy.
Visually pleasing and entertaining.
:D
**Carla Gugino mini-marathon
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/9708/facecarlagugino.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 07, 2009, 02:21:33 PM
(http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/8451/spykids3.jpg)
The Spy Kids are back again! This time, their trademark action is combined with the very latest digital technology and the thrill of the 3-D experience to deliver a motion picture event that pushes family fun to the next level! Secret agents Juni (Daryl Sabara) and Carmen Cortez (Alexa Vega) set out on their most mind-blowing mission yet: a journey inside the virtual reality world of a 3-D video game where awe-inspiring graphics and creatures come dangerously to life! As they face escalating challenges through increasingly difficult levels of the game, the Spy Kids must rely on humor, high-tech gadgets and the bonds of family in order to stop a power-hungry villain (Sylvester Stallone) set on controlling the youth of the world! Also starring favorites Antonio Banderas, Carla Gugino and Ricardo Montalban in an incredible all-star cast!
Oh dear, I lost the 3d glasses and our regular sets also missing :suicide:
Thought I could watch the film without them but oh no, it is regularly just a hazy blur.
Gave up!
**Carla Gugino mini-marathon
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/9708/facecarlagugino.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 07, 2009, 02:27:05 PM
(http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/5272/24565medium.jpg)
Oscar® nominee† Robert Downey Jr. "gives the performance of his career"* in this acclaimed, all-star movie that weaves sly comedy, suspenseful film noir and spirited musical numbers into one of the most original productions in years.
When it comes to murder, seduction and betrayal, pulp-fiction author Dan Dark (Downey) wrote the book. But now, he's living it. Languishing in a hospital room with an immobilizing condition, Dark has lost himself in the fictional world of his alter ego, a hardboiled detective and dance-band singer living in 1950s Los Angeles. As Dark's grasp on reality continues to slip, he's placed under the care of an enigmatic psychiatrist (Oscar® winner†† Mel Gibson). Together, they plunge into the mystery of Dark's psyche, where everyone is suspect and danger waits at every turn.
Co-starring Robin Wright Penn, Jeremy Northam, Katie Holmes, Carla Gugino and Oscar® winner Adrien Brody**, 'The Singing Detective' hits all the right notes.
The switch of backdrop from UK to USA, the reduced running time, the lack of Michael Gambon in the lead, all diminished this movie in comparison to the brilliant original BBC series.
However with Potter having written this simpler screenplay, and if you had not watched the original, this movie is not bad and would stand alone as an interesting piece directed by Gibson. Downey does his best in the lead, but never seems to manage to portray the pain, desperation and psychologically damaged mind that the disease has brought Dan Dark.
Gibson (with amazing makeup) does a great job as the psychiatrist, and a solid supporting cast do their best with a tricky storyline. A big downer for me was the music, which for some reason had been switched to the 50's and didn't work?
Moving, dark and comic all rolled into one.
:D
**Carla Gugino mini-marathon
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/9708/facecarlagugino.jpg)
Post by: goodguy on August 07, 2009, 11:33:08 PM
Singing Detective
...Based on Dennis Potter's stunningly brilliant 1986 mini-series of the same name...
While this US version is surprisingly good, you need to watch the original 6hour mini-series!! "Stunningly brilliant" doesn't even begin to cover it.
EDITh:
Sorry, if I'm preaching to the choir. Since you are from the UK, chances are somewhat better that you already have.
Post by: richierich on August 08, 2009, 12:32:04 AM
Singing Detective
...Based on Dennis Potter's stunningly brilliant 1986 mini-series of the same name...
While this US version is surprisingly good, you need to watch the original 6hour mini-series!! "Stunningly brilliant" doesn't even begin to cover it.
EDITh:
Sorry, if I'm preaching to the choir. Since you are from the UK, chances are somewhat better that you already have.
lol - you are preaching to the choir. :yep:
As per my review, I was pleasantly surprised with the adaptation, but of course not a patch on the original tv series, which i must try and source on dvd as I'd like to watch it again one day
Post by: richierich on August 08, 2009, 12:43:05 AM
(http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/990/2700medium.jpg)
Two time Oscar®-nominee Winona Ryder stars in the fascinating true story of a young woman's life-altering stay at a famous psychiatric hospital in the turbulent late 1960s.
Questionably diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder, Susanna (WINONA RYDER) rebels against the head nurse (WHOOPI GOLDBERG) and top psychiatrist (VANESSA REDGRAVE), choosing instead to befriend the resident "loonies" – a group of troubled women including the seductively charismatic sociopath Lisa (ANGELINA JOLIE).
But Susanna quickly learns if she wants her freedom, she'll have to face the person who terrifies her most of all: herself.
A substandard cuckoos nest, with women.
Great acting by Ryder, Jolie and Murphy kept me interested in a film which was at times quite difficult to relate to. Despite the setting, subject matter and a few harrowing moments, this true story is surprisingly uplifting, detailing a number of friendships and a young womans journey into understanding her position in life.
The film provides a believable insight into a mental institution and is very thought provoking, Jolies performance alone is worth the cost of the dvd.
:D
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: Achim on August 08, 2009, 08:39:53 AM
Oh dear, I lost the 3d glasses and our regular sets also missing :suicide:The US release had the entire film in 2-D as well. Guess that would have come in handy for you; watching 3-D without glasses for 30min or more does sound like a painful experience.
Thought I could watch the film without them but oh no, it is regularly just a hazy blur.
Gave up!
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 08, 2009, 12:01:03 PM
Post by: richierich on August 08, 2009, 10:35:15 PM
(http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/3695/25128medium.jpg)
A pampered life in London collides with the stark realities of poverty and hunger in the world's most dangerous hot spots in 'Beyond Borders', a sweeping romantic adventure starring Academy Award®-winner ANGELINA JOLIE* ('Lara Croft Tomb Raider').
While attending a fundraising gala, Sarah Jordan (Jolie), a naïve, married American socialite living in England, witnesses a fiery plea delivered by an intruder – a renegade humanitarian, Dr. Nick Callahan (CLIVE OWEN, 'Croupier'). His plea, made on behalf of impoverished children under his care, turns Sarah's life upside down. Attracted to Nick and his cause, she impulsively abandons her sheltered life in England to work along side him in his effort to aid the refugee camps.
As Sarah's work takes her to these volatile areas, where few people have traveled and even fewer have survived, she discovers that the harsh realities she encounters – and her growing attraction to the charismatic, unpredictable doctor – ignite in her a passion for saving lives...while risking her own in the process.
Despite a very good performance from Jolie and Owen, and a story about aid workers and refugees which surely must be told, there was something missing, perhaps it just didn't gel too well together? Or perhaps it was the voyeuristic feel the viewer has, watching what must be genuine starving Africans in the name of entertainment?
I felt rather guilty after watching this, wondering how much of the box office returns or the Hollywood stars income was ploughed back into countries like Ethiopia or Somalia? And the faked settings in some instances were just too obvious, spoiling the feel of the movie. At times it even felt like this was a political statement and it was being forced down your throat as opposed to us being able to determine an opinion.
Worthy subject, poorly delivered.
:-\
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 10, 2009, 01:37:09 AM
(http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5218/d17417.jpg)
In the year 2074, a cyborg manufacturing company schemes to stop their main competitor by booby-trapping a gorgeous female cyborg with explosives designed to destroy everything in sight. After she discovers their intentions, she teams with a human to stop the nefarious plot. Jack Palance, Elias Koteas and Angelina Jolie star.
Disappointing sci-fi, completely unbelievable scenario and backdrop to the movie, the film unfortunately plodded on with little to save its fate.
The chemistry between the 2 leads was invisible, and only Jack Palance could walk away with any credit. Some of the special effects were interesting, and the fight scenes would prove brutal enough to be watchable, but besides this I struggle to find a positive to note.
An awful sequel, which made the pretty dire first film seem good.
:yawn:
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 10, 2009, 01:53:11 AM
(http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/2838/89491medium.jpg)
From Academy Award®-winning director Robert Zemeckis* comes a visionary and critically acclaimed adventure unlike anything you have ever seen before! Zemeckis' masterful use of digitally enhanced live-action transports you to a world beyond imagination and brings the fierce battlegrounds of an ancient time to breathtaking life. Featuring incredible footage not seen in theaters and starring Oscar® winners Anthony Hopkins** and Angelina Jolie***, along with Ray Winstone, Robin Wright Penn and John Malkovich, the Beowulf Director's Cut is groundbreaking filmmaking of epic proportions.
Truly amazing feat of ingenuity and animated visual bliss, sadly let down by a fairly average storyline and a pointlessly high volume of gore and bloodletting. I wish I had seen it in its original 3d, but even in 2d it was still stunning, somewhat like a pc game in extreme.
The film felt padded out, the last half an hour was pointlessly long and the tale had been told way before. The characters in general were rather shallow, and I would have liked to learn more of the original story of Beowulf and Grendel. Perhaps too much emphasis was paid to the technology as opposed to the storyline of a movie.
Did anyone else think Beowulf looked like Sean Bean, and not Ray Winstone??
:D
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 11, 2009, 01:00:04 AM
(http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/7541/6637medium.jpg)
A sexy, romantic comedy about modern couples coming together in funny and unexpected ways, Playing by Heart features an amazing cast of hot stars! Paul (Sean Connery – The Rock) and Hannah (Gena Rowlands – The Mighty) discover that...even after 40 years of marriage...they can still learn some very surprising things about each other! Meredith (Gillian Anderson – The X-Files) is a serious theatre director who isn’t looking for a relationship...but has one looking for her in the person of the funny, persistent Trent (Jon Stewart – The Faculty)! Then there’s Joan (Angelina Jolie – Playing God) and Keenan (Ryan Phillippe – I Know What You Did Last Summer), young people searching for love in an L.A. club scene where the rules of dating seem to change every night! A witty, charming motion picture that critics love – you too will fall for this seductive treat!
Confusing and torturously slow build-up, but once the various stories start inter-mingling and you get a better idea of what is happening, the quality of the acting takes over and the final feeling was that it was a cleverly crafted film.
An adult movie, the blend of comedy, compassion, enlightenment and discovery is wonderfully handled, and the cast line-up is very enviable. I'd have liked to see more interaction between some of the main players, but alas not.
Best thought of as an above average made for tv movie.
:D
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 17, 2009, 04:00:34 PM
(http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/1865/4554medium.jpg)
None of Hitchcock's films has ever given a clearer view of his genius for suspense than Rear Window. When professional photographer J.B "Jeff" Jeffries (James Stewart) is confined to a wheelchair with a broken leg, he becomes obsessed with watching the private dramas of his neighbors play out across the courtyard. When he suspects a salesman may have murdered his nagging wife, Jeffries enlists the help of his glamorous socialite girlfriend (Grace Kelly) to investigate the highly suspicious chain of events...Events that ultimately lead to one of the most memorable and gripping endings in all of film history.
Everything I like in Hitch on display in one classic movie. Suspense in lumps, leading up to the hold your breath flat searching by the captivating Grace Kelly, a barrage of wit and sarcasm with Jimmy Stewart, and a masterclass in storytelling by the big man himself.
This movie has aged brilliantly, it is incredibly watchable and you can't help but be absorbed in following Stewarts peeping tom antics. I had a sense of claustraphobia watching this, and a suspicion of all the neighbours! Great set, great cast, and a scene-juggling finalé to savour.
No better proof that simple and cheap can be made into a masterpiece in the right hands.
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on August 18, 2009, 01:15:17 AM
(http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/9467/3832medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winners Nicolas Cage ('The Rock') and sexy Angelina Jolie ('The Bone Collector') ride an unstoppable wave of speed and adrenaline in this hot, edgy action hit from high-octane producer Jerry Bruckheimer ('Armageddon'). Legendary car booster Randall "Memphis" Raines (Cage) thought he’d left the fast lane behind - until he’s forced out of retirement in a do-or-die effort to save his kid brother (Giovanni Ribisi, 'Saving Private Ryan') from the wrath of an evil mobster! But with speed to burn and attitude to spare, Memphis hastily re-assembles his old crew - a rogues' gallery including Academy Award® winner Robert Duvall ('A Civil Action') - and floors it in a full-throttle race to pull off the ultimate car heist: 50 exotic beauties in 24 hours - and the cops are already on to them! Directed by Dominic Sena and written by Scott Rosenberg, 'Gone In 60 Seconds' is an action-packed thrill ride that comes out fast and never slows down.
Petrolhead and car chase fans dream. Fortunately I am not a chav so these things do not overly appeal as the sole focus of a film. This movie generally drifted past me with little impact. Jolie, Duvall and Cage were ill-fitting cast members, but the performances of Ribiso and Lindo were on the money.
If the film could have changed the leads, introduced humour, and developed the storyline, then it might have worked better.
Empty, characterless and at times as cheesy as a mouldy edam
:-\
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 19, 2009, 12:32:23 AM
(http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/7706/14049medium.jpg)
'Angelina Jolie' and 'Edward Burns' sizzle in this romantic comedy about making choices, making friends and making a mess. Lanie (Jolie) is a beautiful, ambitious newscaster who thinks that having the perfect hair, perfect boyfriend and perfect apartment adds up to the perfect life, until an encounter with a street psychic throws her world into chaos. With the help of her handsome, wise-cracking co-worker Peter (Burns), Lanie must face a destiny as hilarious as it is romantic.
Interesting little movie I had not known much about prior to viewing.
We are spared the typical break-down scenes in other movies where a scenario of impending death is tackled, the approach taken in this movie is very light-hearted, warmly handled and refreshing. I saw a new dimension in Jolies acting, she effortlessly shines in this role and was heads above the rest of the cast. At times her uncanny appearance (with blonde wig) to Marilyn Monroe was spooky.
There is enough originality in the storyline to maintain interest, and I would recommend saving this film for a rainy day, with someone you love.
:D
**Angelina Jolie mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3969/angelinajolie1871150x15.jpg)
Post by: Najemikon on August 19, 2009, 02:01:16 AM
Petrolhead and car chase fans dream. Fortunately I am not a chav so these things do not overly appeal as the sole focus of a film.
:hmmmm:
Now, this film is rubbish, but to be fair, so was the original, except for an amazing... car chase. In fact, I did an entire marathon of movies that in some cases were just... car chases. And featured... petrol heads. Chavvy Marathon! (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,2762.0.html)
:weep:
I'm not a chav. Honest I'm not.
Post by: richierich on August 19, 2009, 10:17:46 AM
Petrolhead and car chase fans dream. Fortunately I am not a chav so these things do not overly appeal as the sole focus of a film.
:hmmmm:
Now, this film is rubbish, but to be fair, so was the original, except for an amazing... car chase. In fact, I did an entire marathon of movies that in some cases were just... car chases. And featured... petrol heads. Chavvy Marathon! (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,2762.0.html)
:weep:
I'm not a chav. Honest I'm not.
I believe you Jon - by the way thats a nice Burberry cap your wearing :devil:
Post by: richierich on August 19, 2009, 05:30:39 PM
(http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/452/11772medium.jpg)
Like mother, like daughter. Neither New York playwright Sidda Lee Walker nor her eccentric Louisiana mother Vivi will likely take steps to mend the rift between them. No, this is a job for the Ya-Ya Sisterhood.
The Ya-Yas- sworn lifelong friends of Vivi -stage an unorthodox "intervention” to bring daughter and mother together in this warm adaptation of Rebecca Wells' bestsellers, written for the screen and directed byiCallie Khouri (Thelma & Louise). Sandra Bullock plays Sidda and leadsia stellar cast: Ellen Burstyn, Ashley Judd, James Garner, Fionnula Flanagan, Shirley Knight, Maggie Smith, and more. "This sisterhood is powerful and powerfully funny," The Philadelphia Inquirer's Carrie Rickey wrote: Ya-Ya to that!
Classic chickflick examining a mother/daughter relationship, certainly a good book adaption and well acted.
Maggie Smith and Ellen Burstyn steal the show as 2 elderly eccentric members of the sisterhood, and Ashley Judd is surprisingly accomplished in the role as the crazy younger Vivi. There are several funny parts, and extremely in-depth characterisations, but I found it dragging and overly sentimental for too many segments of the movie.
Definately one for the ladies, but it is watchable for a fella - just!
:D
**Sandra Bullock mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/461/sandrabullock.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 12:39:05 AM
(http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/8702/3927medium.jpg)
An epic adventure and milestone in cinematic achievement, The Prince Of Egypt has captivated movie audiences the world over, becoming one of the top animated films of all time. Unparalleled artistry and powerful Academy Award™ - winning* music bring this beloved story to life as never before, with unforgettable characters voiced by a roster of stars as impressive as any ever assembled for a feature film.
This is the extraordinary tale of two brothers, one born of royal blood, one an orphan with a secret past. Growing up the best of friends, they share a strong bond of free-spirited youth and good-natured rivalry. But the truth will ultimately set them at odds, as one becomes the ruler of the most powerful empire on earth, the other the chosen leader of his people. Their final confrontation will forever change their lives – and the world.
Very reminiscent of a Disney animation, this story of Moses is impressive technically, has a great soundtrack, and is blessed with a heavyweight cast list which make the voices very recognisable.
Not sure how accurate this is in relation to the bible, but scenes such as the red sea crossing and the overall colourful 'feel' were exquisite and memorable.
Now over a decade old, this still appears as an impressive movie technically, and merits a viewing
:D
**Sandra Bullock mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/461/sandrabullock.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 12:52:45 AM
(http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/1289/4450medium.jpg)
Deep in the hot and steamy Amazon jungle, activist Alyssa Rothman (SANDRA BULLOCK) helps a brash photojournalist (CRAIG SHEFFER) investigate the assassination of a famous enviromentalist, at the risk of their own lives.
Disappointing low budget film, this fails for me in so many areas I found myself willing it to end.
It is so badly dated, feels like an early 70's film, with probably the worst audio I've witnessed on a dvd. It seems this is just a straight copy from VHS with no improvements made, the picture was poor and the production/menus cheap and nasty.
As for the film, the message is contrived and politically blatant, with the execution amateurish and direction levels non-existent. It is hard to believe this is Sandra Bullock, as her acting is weak. At best you may describe this as a docu-drama, at worst a school media studies exercise.
The only upside would be if you wanted to see Sandra naked, but in truth you don't see much and it is fleetingly uninteresting.
A real stinker to avoid.
:yucky:
**Sandra Bullock mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/461/sandrabullock.jpg)
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 22, 2009, 12:55:38 AM
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 22, 2009, 12:56:56 AM
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 01:05:38 AM
just looked on amazon.com... looks like my only choice would be marketplace as it has been discontinued here.
very cheap in UK - http://www.thehut.com/hut/62820.product?affil=BUYAT
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 22, 2009, 01:39:54 AM
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 09:09:59 PM
OK... now why haven't I heard of Fire on the Amazon? As much as I love Sandra Bullock! Will be waiting for your review of this one Rich!
Pete - SAVE YOUR MONEY, DO NOT BUY THIS PILE OF HORSE *%@#
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 22, 2009, 09:13:05 PM
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 09:36:09 PM
(http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/1492/21467medium.jpg)
Sandra Bullock gives her most critically acclaimed performance in this touching and heartwarming story about following your heart and finding yourself. Birdee Pruitt (Bullock) has a life most people would envy. But when her cheating husband reveals his infidelity to her on a national TV talk show, her perfect life comes crashing down. Devastated, Birdee and her young daughter head home to the small town she left behind. As mother and daughter struggle to adjust to their new lives, Birdee slowly gains the strength to open her heart – and find hope again.
Very mushy and over-sentimental, this was like a country and western song on celluloid.
The whole flick came across very false, Connick jr was a poor wooden and cheesy lead, and there was zero chemistry with Bullock who tried hard to pull this film from the grave. The eccentric characters do not gel, and the children just come across as spoilt brats. The humour was absent, the sad points too depressing, and the pace deathly slow. I believe this was Forest Whitaker directing - he should stick to acting.
Typical underdog fights back to find love and happiness storyline that Sandra has appeared too often in, but this is the worst of the bunch and a disappointing vehicle for her acting skills. Unless you are a woman hoping to get teary eyed at some of this movies sad parts, it is unlikely to float your boat.
:-\
**Sandra Bullock mini-marathon
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/461/sandrabullock.jpg)
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 22, 2009, 09:39:00 PM
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 11:19:25 PM
Another review I have to look forward to. This one I at least heard of... but haven't gotten around to getting it yet.
Again Pete, you should save your money, this is the lovely Sandra in a very poor film IMO
Post by: richierich on August 22, 2009, 11:27:05 PM
(http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/267/55797medium.jpg)
Matt Damon (The Bourne Supremacy, Ocean's 12) and Heath Ledger (The Patriot, A Knight's Tale) team up to bring you one of the year's most fantastic adventures in this magical tale based on the lives of the legendary storytellers. Will and Jake Grimm (Damon and Ledger) dazzle small towns with their imaginative folklore and elaborate illusions. But when the brothers journey into a real enchanted forest, they encounter many of the fantastic characters and thrilling situations found in their beloved fairy tales! From the award-winning director of Twelve Monkeys, Brazil and Monty Python And The Holy Grail, this fabulous motion picture is sure to leave you living happily ever after!
A true spectacle of a film, amazing effects, effective cast, humour and truly oddball script. However despite a lot of promise it fails to meet the mark, in fact at times it became boring. Terry Gilliam is written all over the production and delivery, some dark moments, with a touch of cheese thrown in. The sets were fairly spectacular, but I found so much was going on at any one time the screen felt cluttered.
Quirky and entertaining at times, this gothic fairy tale is better in principle and concept than receipt.
:-\
**Monica Bellucci mini-marathon
(http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4001/monicabelluccipicture21.jpg)
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 22, 2009, 11:38:07 PM
Another review I have to look forward to. This one I at least heard of... but haven't gotten around to getting it yet.
Again Pete, you should save your money, this is the lovely Sandra in a very poor film IMO
Thanks Rich... that is unfortunate. I actually had hoped this one would be good.
Post by: richierich on August 23, 2009, 01:23:51 AM
Another review I have to look forward to. This one I at least heard of... but haven't gotten around to getting it yet.
Again Pete, you should save your money, this is the lovely Sandra in a very poor film IMO
Thanks Rich... that is unfortunate. I actually had hoped this one would be good.
Don't just go by me Pete, I'd hate for you to miss a film which you may like. It is highly rated on epinions - http://www99.epinions.com/reviews/mvie_mu-1082975
Post by: Najemikon on August 23, 2009, 02:30:36 AM
Post by: richierich on August 23, 2009, 10:27:24 PM
(http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2448/8765medium.jpg)
A dangerous, thrilling mystery of chilling proportions, BROTHERHOOD OF THE WOLF leaps from the screen with breathtaking action and incredible suspense blended with high-flying martial arts excitement.
When a mysterious beast ravages the countryside, two unlikely heroes are called in to fight the evil. The only way they can save the land from this unspeakable terror is to face their greatest fears, unearth a dark power and reveal a deadly secret. Harry Knowles of Aintitcoolnews.com raves, "A Remarkable Film. As Cool As They Come!"
A remarkable mix of fact and fiction, a fantasy like film involving martial arts, witchcraft, an indian, hero and heroine, and of course the French fabled beast from the 18th century.
Despite all of this it is incredibly dull, hollow and ridiculous. The plot is predictable, the acting average at best, and the direction weak. I would rate a hammer house of horror above this attempt, as it spiralled downhill after the first quarter of an hour. The scenery is pleasant, some of the effects inspiring, but the length of the film is truly painful and a marathon to endure.
:yawn:
**Monica Bellucci mini-marathon
(http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4001/monicabelluccipicture21.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 24, 2009, 10:44:47 PM
(http://img269.imageshack.us/img269/8012/32392medium.jpg)
When biotech exec Jack (Anthony Mackie, 8 Mile) blows the whistle on his greedy drug-conglomerate bosses (Woody Harrelson, Natural Born Killers and Ellen Barkin, Sea of Love) over an insider-trading scandal, he gets more than he bargained for. Once this playa is played, he finds himself hitting rock bottom when an old flame, Fatina (Kerry Washington, Save the Last Dance) blows back into his life with the ultimate job offer: father her child, no strings attached. Teaming up to turn the tables on corporate culture, he sets up shop as a stud-for-hire at 10 G's a pop for a bevy of wealthy lesbians. When Jack delivers the goods, even his ex's glamazon gal pals can't resist his considerable...charms. Torn between love and money, Jack chases his American Dream all the way to the bank. But things heat up when Jack impregnates the Mafia daughter (Monica Bellucci, The Matrix Reloaded) of a notorious boss (John Turturro, Secret Window), triggering the FBI to expose Jack's cash-cow scheme.
A Spike Lee film again about minorities (lesbians), but ended up more like a male fantasy!
It is a bizarre mix of sexual politics and big business, and at times you have to wonder whether a message is trying to come through the film in subliminal form. After half an hour or so, as the lead finds a new occupation in life having sex with beautiful lesbians to impregnate them (at times quite graphic) for $10k a time, it feels a bit pervy. Throw in cartoon sperm (not literally), an artsy feel at times, and certainly a few erotic scenes. Then near the end it all gets a bit strange and emotional as he is involved in a menage-a-trois with the main lesbian couple, and Dad to the 2 kids they have had from his seed.
It must be humiliating for a real lesbian if they saw this film, as it basically says that a handsome man with big 'equipment' would immediately make them go like a train and realise what they are missing! And the ending scenes are truly cringe-worthy.
Saying all of the above, it was still watchable in an odd way, and I especially recommend this to Tom for his lesbian marathon.
:D
**Monica Bellucci mini-marathon
(http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4001/monicabelluccipicture21.jpg)
Post by: addicted2dvd on August 24, 2009, 11:01:03 PM
I was actually going to say that while it doesn't sound like my sort of film, Riches review suggests it's ok for a certain audience and I suspect Pete can be a soppy old bugger who'd quite like it... ;)
:laugh:
Will keep it in mind... and may pick it up if I can get it cheap. :P
Post by: Achim on August 25, 2009, 06:32:11 AM
Brotherhood Of The Wolf:o
Wow, you sure left not a single good hair on the film in your review...
I remember it fairly exciting and while maybe a little too long I don't really recal that to be a major bother. maybe I should rewatch...
Post by: richierich on August 25, 2009, 10:36:51 AM
Brotherhood Of The Wolf:o
Wow, you sure left not a single good hair on the film in your review...
I remember it fairly exciting and while maybe a little too long I don't really recal that to be a major bother. maybe I should rewatch...
I really wanted to love this film - and the beginning I found really inspiring
(click to show/hide)
Doubt if I will return to this one - it just wasn't my cup of tea :shrug:
Post by: richierich on August 25, 2009, 11:01:24 AM
(http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/6223/25224medium.jpg)
From Academy Award®-Winning director Mel Gibson comes a profound story of courage and sacrifice depicting the final twelve hours in the life of Jesus Christ.
Featuring stunning cinematography and an inspired performance by Jim Caviezel, The Passion of the Christ is a triumphant and uncompromising filmmaking achievement.
Brutal, graphic, relentless and compelling. It is beautifully shot, but the level of violence is so extreme you become numbed by it, and I had a bad taste in my mouth after watching this. The Aramaic and Latin dialogue is not distracting if you are happy with subtitles, and the acting from the whole cast is top drawer. It is certainly moving in it's depiction of a man being tortured and killed in such an extreme nature, however Gibson perhaps lingers too much on this graphic display of suffering.
Not sure why there was such controversy over this film, perhaps the depiction of jews as evil antagonists, the Romans (aside from Pilate and his wife) as brutal drunkard sadists, or the 'historical accuracy'? The flashbacks of Jesus of Nazareths early life are far too infrequent reliefs from the violence, too short, and haphazard. When the cruxifixion finally takes place you are so used to the brutality that it has less shock appeal than I would have thought, and the ending could not come quick enough.
I am glad I have watched this, I can't say it was a pleasure, more of an experience.
:D
**Monica Bellucci mini-marathon
(http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/4001/monicabelluccipicture21.jpg)
Post by: RossRoy on August 25, 2009, 08:33:59 PM
Brotherhood Of The Wolf:o
Wow, you sure left not a single good hair on the film in your review...
I remember it fairly exciting and while maybe a little too long I don't really recal that to be a major bother. maybe I should rewatch...
I'm with you on that. I remember liking the movie very much. I may have to revisit. I haven't seen it for a while.
Post by: richierich on August 26, 2009, 01:07:16 AM
(http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/2194/thelandthattimeforgotdv.jpg)
This modern adaptation of Edgar Rice Burroughs’ classic novel finds the crew of a ship in the middle of a mysterious storm. They black out and wake up on the shore of an uncharted island. When they go exploring, they soon discover that the island is inhabited by prehistoric beasts... and a boat-load of Nazis. With two enemies to keep at bay, the crew tries to find a way off the island before becoming dinosaur lunch.
I assume an intentional B movie style, the 'creatures' are hysterically poor, the budget must have been bottom drawer, the acting is a mixture of ham and cheese, and the target audience clearly circa 10 year old boys with vivid imaginations.
If this was made seriously then it misses the mark by a massive mile, and I could list here forever the faults of the film such as awful effects, a friendly bunch of nazi inhabitants, and woeful adaptation.etc etc etc
However I prefer to treat this as a fun and tongue in cheek cheapie offering, that left me with a smile on my face through it's sheer awfulness.
:-\
Post by: richierich on August 26, 2009, 01:21:14 AM
(http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/7114/9562medium.jpg)
Sean Penn and Michelle Pfeiffer give career-defining performances in this humorous and heartwarming story about a mentally challenged father who enlists the aid of a high-powered attorney to help him regain the custody of his daughter. An all-star supporting cast and a spectacular soundtrack complete this unforgettable story of life, love and laughter!
Touching movie, totally dominated by the 2 wonderful performances of Penn and Pfeiffer. Add in Dakota Fanning as the daughter, and the mix of cast worked tremendously well together in a project clearly all were enthused about.
A whole range of emotions are pulled from you during this movie, many happy, laugh out loud moments, especially with Sam Dawsons troop of friends in court. Then of course there are the lump in the throat, something in my eye moments which litter the film.
Sure it's a manipulative tear-jerker, exploited to the full by Hollywood, 'well it worked for Hoffman' negative comments that could be thrown at the film.
But personally I enjoyed it, I thought the performances were admirable, and it just stayed below the 'too sickly' borderline.
:D
**Laura Dern mini-marathon
(http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/7459/lauradern.jpg)
Post by: Achim on August 26, 2009, 06:22:07 AM
I Am SamFull retard = no Oscar
:tomato:
Post by: Kathy on August 26, 2009, 03:36:37 PM
...the target audience clearly circa 10 year old boys with vivid imaginations.
...that left me with a smile on my face through it's sheer awfulness.
Hmmm I wonder if one has anything to do with the other? :devil:
Post by: richierich on August 26, 2009, 05:55:32 PM
...the target audience clearly circa 10 year old boys with vivid imaginations.
...that left me with a smile on my face through it's sheer awfulness.
Hmmm I wonder if one has anything to do with the other? :devil:
You don't know how close you are Kath!! :hysterical:
Post by: richierich on August 27, 2009, 05:20:54 PM
(http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/8318/3125medium.jpg)
Beneath the surface of small-town serenity lies a dark domain where innocents dare not tread and unpredictability is the norm. It is the haunting realm of Blue Velvet. Spawned from the mind of David Lynch (Mulholland Drive, "Twin Peaks"), Blue Velvet is a "shocking, deeply disturbing...startling mixture of the heartfelt and the horrific" (Newsweek).
Clean-cut Jeffrey Beaumont (Kyle MacLachlan) realizes his Mayberry-like hometown is not so normal when he discovers a human ear in a field. His investigation catapults him into an alluring, erotic murder mystery involving a disturbed nightclub singer (Isabella Rossellini) and a drug-addicted sadist (Dennis Hopper). Soon Jeffrey is led deeper into their depraved existence... to the point of no return.
David Lynch is like the marmite of directors, you either love him or hate him. Unfortunately I fall into the second camp, only ever previously enjoying one of his movies.
My opinion has not changed after viewing Blue Velvet. Certainly there is a shock value to the film, albeit dated after 2 decades, it subtly hits you on the bonce like a sledgehammer, your senses are tickled as if with a taser, and seedier elements of the film will stay with me.
Dennis Hopper as the vicious psycho was superb, but the rest of the cast just didn't work for me in this, Laura Dern was too old for the role, and MacLachlan a feeble lead. Lynch's style is not my cup of tea, very slow and arty, brooding looks, pans to a tree, or to a specific prop, just doesn't work for my simple brain.
I am sure the cardigan and pipe brigade will tell me how wonderful this movie is, exploring the dark side and sexual frustrations of human nature, with the backdrop of suburban America. But I just found it too pretentious, empty, depressing and confused.
:-\
**Laura Dern mini-marathon
(http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/7459/lauradern.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 28, 2009, 10:21:24 AM
(http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/7866/45926medium.jpg)
Jack Linden (Mark Ruffalo) and Hank Evans (Peter Krause) are best friends who both teach at the same university in a small New England town. They both have young children and Jack's wife, Terry (Laura Dern) is close with Hank's wife, Edith (Naomi Watts). But while things appear happy on the surface, there are smouldering pockets of discontent underneath. Financial struggle and domestic boredom has drained the passion from Jack and Terry's marriage, while Hank's numerous infidelities and self-absorption has prompted Edith to find both comfort and sexual fulfilment with Jack. As Jack begins spending more and more time with Edith, it becomes obvious to Terry, whose anger culminates in a sexual encounter with Hank. Now that the deception has come full circle, both couples are left to decide the futures of their shattered unions...
Depressingly honest, frighteningly accurate, an adult drama that is guaranteed to make you feel shit!
It's view on infidelity, and the damage it can cause to all parties, is reflectively portrayed with brutal performances from all 4 leads. The pace works well, and you feel you know the characters intimately by the end of the film.
But the subject matter for me is too near the bone, the film is a bit too Hollywood in parts, and the ending is fairly unreal.
:-\
**Laura Dern mini-marathon
(http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/7459/lauradern.jpg)
Post by: goodguy on August 28, 2009, 10:47:31 AM
Blue Velvet
...
David Lynch is like the marmite of directors, you either love him or hate him. Unfortunately I fall into the second camp, only ever previously enjoying one of his movies.
...
I am sure the cardigan and pipe brigade will tell me how wonderful this movie is...
*Snicker* I'm probably the only one around here in that brigade. I have no strong opinion on Blue Velvet, it's simply too long since I have seen it. So what's the one you did like? My personal favorites are Mullholland Dr. and Wild at Heart. I also really like The Straight Story, but that's as un-Lynchian as you can get. It wouldn't be that one, would it?
Post by: richierich on August 28, 2009, 12:42:47 PM
Blue Velvet
...
David Lynch is like the marmite of directors, you either love him or hate him. Unfortunately I fall into the second camp, only ever previously enjoying one of his movies.
...
I am sure the cardigan and pipe brigade will tell me how wonderful this movie is...
*Snicker* I'm probably the only one around here in that brigade. I have no strong opinion on Blue Velvet, it's simply too long since I have seen it. So what's the one you did like? My personal favorites are Mullholland Dr. and Wild at Heart. I also really like The Straight Story, but that's as un-Lynchian as you can get. It wouldn't be that one, would it?
I haven't watched Mulholland Dr. in such a long time I can't say too much on that, other than it didn't appeal or repel me. The one I liked was The Elephant Man, but having thought about it I remember Eraserhead favourably also. Wild at heart again is unmemorable for me, and The Straight Story (the lawnmower trip?) I have never seen.
Perhaps his stories and direction is generally beyond me in intelligence, I sit down for a movie typically to be entertained, so I would class myself as a 'popcorn viewer'. I'd have thought the majority of Lynch's fans are professors, arty types, film students and 'thinkers', smoking pipes, wearing jackets and cardigans with elbow patches, and discussing 'meaningful' things in trendy coffee bars. :headscratch:
I know that is typecasting (with tongue firmly in cheek) as there are no doubt millions of fans of his who may not fall into those categories, but I wonder who can enjoy having their senses and emotions pulled in all directions by some of his peculiar films. What I would say is he is totally original, and treads his own path without thought of critical acclaim.
The only thing i find more preposterous than Lynch's directing - is his hairstyle :hysterical:
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/683/davidlynchdirectsmobysn.jpg)
Post by: Najemikon on August 28, 2009, 09:33:46 PM
I enjoyed The Straight Story. It's supposedly true, if I remember correctly, and it's very gentle and straightforward. Slow, but poignant and might leave you with a big smile. It's certainly odd, but not completely bonkers and the story is only as deep as you want to think about it. Guy drives hundreds of miles to reach his brother, using a lawnmower. He meets various people along the way. That's it.
I'd try something similar, but I doubt I'll get too far out of my garden. The cable won't reach... :bag: :laugh: :tease:
Post by: richierich on August 29, 2009, 12:14:24 AM
(http://img268.imageshack.us/img268/9749/12570medium.jpg)
Jennifer Aniston turns in "a fantastic performance" (Us Weekly) in this quirky comedy about first encounters and second chances. Thirty-year-old Justine Last (Aniston) longs for a life more fulfilling than the one she leads with her boring husband (John C. Reilly) and dead-end job at the Retail Rodeo. But when a passionate young co-worker (Jake Gyllenhaal) catches her eye and steals her heart, Justine's good-girl existence takes a turn for the worse — with unexpected and comical results.
Aniston wipes off the mak-up and glamour and displays an acting talent in this serious role I haven't seen from her before, and was impressive in the lead.
Sadly the script was not as ambitious, and although a fairly realistic and dark plot, the movie was only mildly impacting.
Gyllenhall yet again plays a moody teen character to great effect, and the portrayal of the love-sick nerd living in a dream world is convincing.
Certainly not a comedy, despite a few classic monets (sperm bank), more a small town moral choosing mild drama.
Needed a bit more directive oomph to make this one to recommend.
:D
**Jennifer Aniston mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/135/jenniferanistonap.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 30, 2009, 08:08:12 PM
(http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/3867/2110medium.jpg)
Something huge is on the horizon. Hogarth Hughes just rescued an enormous robot that fell from the stars to Earth. Now young Hogarth has one very big friend and an even bigger problem: How do you keep a 50-foot-tall, steal-eating (junkyard cars are especially tasty) giant a secret? It's even harder when a nosy government agent arrives in town to hunt down the "alien invader" and the combined land, sea and air might of the U.S. military is sent to demolish the giant. The result: an incredible adventure that's part metal, part magic, all heart.
Enjoyed this excellent animation, not for any groundbreaking technology but for a thoughtful, fun storyline that you couldn't hate even if you tried. The film has a huge heart and is not sickly sweet like the latest Disneys, it has genuine humour and feeling, adventurous and blessed with a pace that makes the film feel like it has ended too quickly. Congratulations to the director, and the host of voices who bring this movie alive.
Perfect for all ages
;D
**Jennifer Aniston mini-marathon
(http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/135/jenniferanistonap.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 30, 2009, 08:25:48 PM
(http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/8928/106332medium.jpg)
Academy Award® nominee Robert Downey Jr.* and Academy Award® winner Jamie Foxx** star in an extraordinary and inspiring true story of how a chance meeting can change a life. The Soloist tells the poignant and ultimately soaring tale of a Los Angeles newspaper reporter who discovers a brilliant and distracted street musician, with unsinkable passion, and the unique friendship and bond that transforms both their lives. The remarkable performances make for an unforgettable experience in what is hailed as "a courageous and uncompromising film" (Gene Shalit, TODAY).
True story, a very interesting and unique story, but unfortunately delivered to probably only half of its potential. What a shame given the acting talent available, although I am not blaming them. Downey Jr has been a revelation in the last few flicks I've seen him in, but here he is wasted.
This disappointment in the film is heightened after watching the extras, which interviews the real life characters, who are wholly more interesting than their celluloid doubles.
This isn't to say the film is awful, it truly isn't. It was enjoyable, enlightening, moving, uplifting and tragic rolled into one. There are scenes that will stay with me, moments of wonder, musical genius, the harsh difference between have and have nots.
This should have been so much more.
:D
**Catherine Keener mini-marathon
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6091/catherinekeener.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 30, 2009, 08:41:14 PM
(http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/6569/16172medium.jpg)
His leading lady just walked off the set. Now to save his career, Viktor Taransky (Academy Award® winner* Al Pacino) must find the ideal actress to replace her.
Enter S1MØNE. She's beautiful, she's talented - in fact she's perfect in every way except one. She's not real. It's lights, camera, and lots of distractions as Vicktor struggles to keep the truth behind Hollywood's latest sensation away from the Paparazzi's prying eyes. But, with S1MØNE launching a singing career and the whole world watching, that's going to be virtually impossible. From the creator of 'The Truman Show' comes this "highly intelligent and highly entertaining" ('David Sheehan', KCBS-TV) comedy about creating a star.
Intriguing concept exposing the fickleness of Hollywood and stardom, sharply written with the right dose of satire. It is clever and fairly original, but sadly after a bright start it becomes monotonous as it drags for 2 hours. It is too one-paced and never bites, staying in 2nd gear for the last 90 minutes. Pacino is not at his best in an unsuitable role, and the support seem a little resigned to playing second fiddle.
This is a light-hearted distraction, of course far-fetched and fantastical, and will not insult your intelligence
:D
**Catherine Keener mini-marathon
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6091/catherinekeener.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 30, 2009, 08:49:16 PM
(http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/3604/2640medium.jpg)
Vincent (NICK NOLTE) and Lyle (JEFF BRIDGES) were once the best of friends - training thoroughbred horses in 1970's California, tearing up the highway in a '58 Buick, spending nights around a campfire, dreaming about the future. Seduced by the highstakes world of horseracing, they plan the perfect scam. In the process, they destroy an innocent man's life and the friendship of a lifetime.
Twenty years later, Carter is the multi-millionaire owner of a Kentucky horse farm while Vinnie is a down-and-out deluded barfly living on the edge in California. The time has come, in Vinnie's mind, to settle the score.
Tricking Carter into travelling back to California, Vinnie sets off for Kentucky to ruin Carter and his wife (SHARON STONE) and offer restitution to Simms (ALBERT FINNEY), the man whose life was destroyed all those many years ago.
Very disjointed, contrived and purposeless film, despite an enviable cast list, you feel little sympathy for the characters and it all feels very awkward. The leads have little chemistry together and are generally unconvincing, the plot becomes ludicrous as it searches for entertainment, and the most unfulfilling ending imaginable is coughed up.
Perhaps the only interesting part of the film is watching Nolte clean himself up in a suit, and Bridges's decline to drink and a vest, a real role reversal.
Keeners role as the messenger in particular was unbelievable, seriously is anyone really that stupid?
I read this was adapted from a play, one can only be grateful we were not subjected to this on a stage!
:yawn:
**Catherine Keener mini-marathon
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6091/catherinekeener.jpg)
Post by: richierich on August 31, 2009, 12:25:45 AM
(http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/9828/41679medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winners* Nicole Kidman and Sean Penn star in the action-packed thriller, The Interpreter. In one of the hidden corridors of power at United Nations headquarters, translator Silvia Broome (Kidman) overhears a potentially explosive secret about a planned assassination attempt. But when federal agent Tobin Keller (Penn) investigates her claim and digs deeper into Silvia's dangerous past, he begins to question whether she is a victim - or a suspect. From Oscar®-winning† director Sydney Pollack comes the riveting, edge-of-your-seat story of international intrigue that Ebert & Roeper give "Two thumbs up!"
Enjoyable pacy Hitchcock-style thriller, intelligently scripted and directed with aplomb by Sydney Pollack.
Penn and Kidman worked well together with an enthusiasm for their parts, creating suspense in spades and developing the plot through to an obvious, but not disappointing, conclusion. The only criticism would be her attempted South African accent, which regularly lapsed between Australian and American.
Was the Motobo president meant to be Mugabe?? Unjust ruler, violence, racism, ethnic cleansing etc.
Political thriller well worth watching.
;D
**Catherine Keener mini-marathon
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6091/catherinekeener.jpg)
Post by: richierich on September 01, 2009, 12:19:48 AM
(http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/724/18675medium.jpg)
Academy Award® winner Julia Roberts (Best Actress, 'Erin Brockovich'*), David Duchovny ('The X-Files') and Blair Underwood ('Rules of Engagement') star in another acclaimed triumph from Oscar®-winning director Steven Soderbergh (Best Director, 'Traffic'*). It's a chaotic day for seven strangers from Hollywood who end up at the birthday party of a mutual friend. Before the night is over, relationships are tested, hearts are broken and passions are renewed! Also starring David Hyde Pierce (TV's 'Frasier'), Catherine Keener ('Being John Malkovich'), Mary McCormack ('K-Pax') and Nicky Katt ('Insomnia').
Self indulgent boring film, thats 2 hours of my life I won't get back!
Tediously done in docu format, a confusing blend of uninteresting characters merge into nothingness, without context or apparent union, plotless and an insult to the viewers intelligence.
What were the likes of Keener, Underwood and Julia Roberts thinking putting their names against this crap? Did a director who handled films like Oceans 11, Traffic and Brokovich really mastermind this home movie?
If I videod my fingernails growing, it would be more interesting.
:yucky:
**Catherine Keener mini-marathon
(http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/6091/catherinekeener.jpg)
Post by: goodguy on September 01, 2009, 12:49:19 AM
Full Frontal
...
Self indulgent boring film
Haven't seen it myself, but Roger Ebert's review ends with: "There is a scene in "Full Frontal" where a character comes to a tragic end while masturbating. That could symbolize the method and fate of this film."
Post by: richierich on September 01, 2009, 01:10:06 AM
Full Frontal
...
Self indulgent boring film
Haven't seen it myself, but Roger Ebert's review ends with: "There is a scene in "Full Frontal" where a character comes to a tragic end while masturbating. That could symbolize the method and fate of this film."
:hysterical: :thumbup: :hysterical:
Oh how i wish i had thought up that perfect description of this dire film
Post by: addicted2dvd on September 01, 2009, 11:15:38 AM
Post by: richierich on September 01, 2009, 11:23:19 AM
This has been on my unwatched list for a long time now... sounds like it will remain there for a while! :P
If you ever do get round to punishing yourself and watching this, do not watch with your daughter. There is continual pointless and extreme swearing, tacky masturbation and sex scenes etc. Lets be honest who wants to see the guy from X-Files jacked off by a masseuse? euwww :yucky:
Post by: addicted2dvd on September 01, 2009, 11:27:33 AM
Post by: goodguy on September 01, 2009, 02:38:26 PM
Lets be honest who wants to see the guy from X-Files jacked off by a masseuse? euwww :yucky:
Well, some obviously do, because Showtime has an entire series about it. Californication is in its 3rd season I believe. I only ever watched two or three episodes of it and was bored to tears.
Post by: Najemikon on September 02, 2009, 12:36:20 AM
Lets be honest who wants to see the guy from X-Files jacked off by a masseuse? euwww :yucky:
Well, some obviously do, because Showtime has an entire series about it. Californication is in its 3rd season I believe. I only ever watched two or three episodes of it and was bored to tears.
I think Californication is fantastic! I've seen some of Full Frontal, enough to know it's absolutely not for me. Californication has a lot more going for it than that.
Post by: richierich on September 09, 2009, 10:48:12 PM
(http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/3605/108772medium.jpg)
You can’t keep a good man down. Jason Statham is back as Chev Chelios – this time to retrieve his stolen heart (that’s right, he’s running on battery power). High-octane and truly electrifying!
Ridiculous storyline, pointlessly over-violent, brutal, blood-thirsty, vulgar and hardcore. Statham slumps to a new low, it is a shame as he used to be in much better roles. Staggering amount of flesh on display, the language will turn your ears blue, and there is an uncomfortable sleaziness that prevails over the whole film.
This may be destined to cult status with it's 'I don't give a f^%$' attitude, but for me it was just too over the top and swamped with such unnecessary gore and violence that it was a turn-off for the movie.
:-\
Post by: Najemikon on September 09, 2009, 11:02:02 PM
Post by: richierich on September 09, 2009, 11:24:29 PM
I assume you've seen part 1? Surely it's more of the same.
Yes, but about 5 times worse :suicide:
Post by: Najemikon on September 09, 2009, 11:44:54 PM
Post by: Jimmy on September 10, 2009, 12:01:08 AM
Post by: richierich on September 10, 2009, 02:17:24 AM
By the way, even he said the film was disappointing, and he can really sit through rubbish if its an 'in' film ::)
Post by: richierich on September 15, 2009, 10:33:58 AM
(http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/2098/97846medium.jpg)
Tom Hanks and Ron Howard unite for their fourth pairing with this follow-up to THE DA VINCI CODE. Harvard symbologist Robert Langdon (Tom Hanks) works to solve a murder and prevent a terrorist act against the Vatican.
The follow on from Da Vinci Code, lacking the originals controversy, and straying further from the book than I would have liked.
It is very current, utilising the Hadron Collider in it's old age look at Religion vs Science. As expected it is a good blend of action and adventure, limitless budget allowing for some spectacular shots and effects, an impressive cast list, and direction/production values we have got used to with Howards films.
The film is more suspenseful than DVC, it feels more 'real', and the twist near the end was well crafted. McGregor stood out for me as the best actor, but it is hard to point a finger at any who under-performed.
But the ending
(click to show/hide)
Certainly it is a 'must' in most dvd collections, but it will never be the greatest.
:D
Post by: richierich on September 25, 2009, 12:46:20 AM
(http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/7822/63861medium.jpg)
Next of Kin's action blasts through Chicago right from the get-go. The mob wants to muscle in on a local business but they make two mistakes. They kill a youth whose brother is a cop. And that cop is Truman Gates (Patrick Swayze), transplant from Appalachia's backwoods to Chicago's mean streets.
For a break from pilot episodes, I thought I'd pay homage to the late Patrick Swayze. This and Roadhouse were my 2 favourite films of his, and IMO is pretty underrated and relatively unknown.
Vigilante flick that sees redneck cop Swayze pitted against some gangsters, it is a bit corny, specifically his marriage somehow to a concert pianist, but he is fairly convincing in the lead role, with Liam Neeson playing his brother with predictable bad accent. Having seen this originally on vhs, the dvd quality was not a major improvement, thankfully nostalgia for the movie saw me through.
No surprise that Swayze ends up throwing his badge away and reeking some bloody revenge, but like Roadhouse can guiltily be enjoyed despite its more obvious flaws.
:D
Post by: richierich on October 13, 2009, 11:14:39 PM
Title: Zulu (Blu-Ray)
Runtime:138
Certificate:PG
Year:1964
Genres:War, Action, Drama
Plot:Zulu is one of the great movies, an epic adventure of courage in the face of incredible odds. Based on a true story, it tells the amazing tale of 100 British soldiers who stood fast against an overwhelming force of 4,000 of the Zulu nation's mightiest warriors in the defense of Rorkes Drift in 1879.
Set amongst the stunning South African scenery, Zulu is a landmark action film and a fitting tribute to some of the most magnificent acts of heroism in the history of warfare.
Michael Caine's role as the arrogant but courageous Lt. Bromhead brought him international fame, and there are powerful performances from other great British actors including Stanley Baker and Jack Hawkins.
My Review:
Superb HD format offering of this classic film, the picture literally comes alive in its vivid reds and greens, wonderful African backdrop and DTS audio that added menace, hope and drama at the right points.
A movie that never dates too harshly, it is literally an institution in the UK following its many xmas TV outings.
A perfect example of drama, wonderful script, great acting, cinematography from top drawer, period detail with amazing attention to detail, and stirring music to pull you into the movie.
Excellent collection of extras to educate more about the film, the true characters, and the making of.
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on October 13, 2009, 11:29:40 PM
Title: Planet of the Apes (blu-ray)
Runtime:112
Certificate:PG
Year:1968
Genres:Science-Fiction, Adventure
Plot:Witness the evolution of a cinematic masterpiece with this 40th Anniversary Edition of the original Planet of the Apes on Blu-ray, loaded with hours of thrilling extras! In this classic action-adventure film that changed the face of sci-fi forever, an astronaut (Charlton Heston) crash-lands on a strange planet ruled by intelligent apes who use a primitive race of humans for experimentation and sport!
My Review:
HD viewing of another classic. The picture was a stunning improvement, but I was disappointed with the sound upgrade to DTShd, which did not come across as such a vast improvement on original dvd. The crystal clear and dramatic action scenes, being able to define expressions on the humans faces, and the depth of colours, made up for this tenfold. Good extras again, and an interesting commentary.
Please see my film review for my write up on POTA
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: Jimmy on October 14, 2009, 04:08:04 AM
More seriously, does your 2 last reviews count as film review for the list?
Post by: Najemikon on October 14, 2009, 08:18:48 AM
Post by: snowcat on October 14, 2009, 08:33:22 AM
Post by: richierich on October 14, 2009, 10:24:50 AM
Did The Midnight Meat Train scared you so much that you needed a break? :tease:
More seriously, does your 2 last reviews count as film review for the list?
Midnight Meat Train was sick, but not scary, although strangely entertaining??
Yes they are reviews for listing.
Post by: richierich on October 14, 2009, 10:26:59 AM
I like Planet of the Apes, but I really don't want to re buy things on Blu ray or HD (unless they are cheap) I bought American Werewolf in London for £2.50 on HD it looked no different... that kind of gave me a bad opinion of older films on HD/Blu ray, Ill have to take a look at a few more.
No-one ever knows what to buy me for b/day or xmas, so now i ask for my top films if available to be bought on bluray as gifts. Much better than socks or bassetts allsorts :thumbup:
The POTA isn't such a massive upgrade in quality, but Zulu was staggeringly better than dvd.
Post by: Najemikon on October 14, 2009, 11:53:56 AM
I like Planet of the Apes, but I really don't want to re buy things on Blu ray or HD (unless they are cheap) I bought American Werewolf in London for £2.50 on HD it looked no different... that kind of gave me a bad opinion of older films on HD/Blu ray, Ill have to take a look at a few more.
No-one ever knows what to buy me for b/day or xmas, so now i ask for my top films if available to be bought on bluray as gifts. Much better than socks or bassetts allsorts :thumbup:
The POTA isn't such a massive upgrade in quality, but Zulu was staggeringly better than dvd.
Yes, I've found the same. It's very much per release. The Thing looked astonishingly good, while The Fly was merely ok...
Post by: snowcat on October 14, 2009, 08:36:46 PM
I think ill wait to re-buy things, Ill wait until they go down really cheap.
Post by: Jimmy on October 14, 2009, 08:58:06 PM
Even a dvd conversion can make a good film looks bad.
(http://img38.imagefra.me/img/img38/2/10/14/aesp_pres/f_gods8onr6klm_3d18de9.jpg)
Post by: Najemikon on October 14, 2009, 09:04:28 PM
In fact, bloody Zulu has just gone on my bloody upgrade list. Bloody hell! What do I need bloody money for anyway? :redcard: ;)
Post by: richierich on October 14, 2009, 10:22:24 PM
Beaver is an excellent site for in-depth analysis of exactly what you get. Sadly they don't seem to have done Escape From New York, but see how both their Zulu (http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDCompare/zulu.htm) and Planet of the Apes (http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews42/planet_of_the_apes_blu-ray.htm) reviews fairly match Rich.
In fact, bloody Zulu has just gone on my bloody upgrade list. Bloody hell! What do I need bloody money for anyway? :redcard: ;)
Fantastic site, clearly if they agreed with me it must be of high quality and perfect taste :tease:
Seriously, Zulu is the most dramatic upgrade I've personally seen on blu-ray so far.
Post by: Achim on October 19, 2009, 02:00:40 PM
Beaver is an excellent site for in-depth analysis of exactly what you get. Sadly they don't seem to have done Escape From New York, but see how both their Zulu (http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film/DVDCompare/zulu.htm) and Planet of the Apes (http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews42/planet_of_the_apes_blu-ray.htm) reviews fairly match Rich.Wow, what a difference. Zulu certainly appears to be looking stellar on Blu!
Post by: richierich on October 25, 2009, 10:08:31 PM
Title: The Shawshank Redemption
Runtime:137
Certificate:15
Year:1994
Genres:Drama
Plot:Nominated for seven Acadamy Awards including Best Film and Best Actor, this film is an extraordinary tale of hope, friendship and survival inside a maximum security prison.
City banker, Andy Dufresne, (Tim Robbins) arrived at Shawshank Prison in 1947, convicted of two brutal murders, he received a double life sentence.
He discovers that when they send you to Shawshank State Prison of life... that is exactly what they take.
Within the confines of Shawshank, Andy forms an unlikely friendship with the prison "fixer" Red (Morgan Freeman). He also becomes popular with the Warden and the prison's guards, as Andy is able to use his banking experience to help the currupt officials amass personal fortunes.
With an extraordinary twist in the tale, Andy finds that survival comes down to a simple choice, get busy living or get busy dying.
My Review:
As a break from the horror marathon, I picked a title that always hovers in my top 10 movies, a film that oozes class and whos appeal never wanes.
Very moving and sentimental, a great adaptation, with Robbins and Freeman putting in their best ever performances. As I am sure everyone has seen it, I won't do a full review, but would just say I believe it is nearly faultless and a modern classic.
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: Kathy on October 25, 2009, 10:27:36 PM
As I am sure everyone has seen it, I won't do a full review, but would just say I believe it is nearly faultless and a modern classic.
I own it but... :bag:
Post by: Tom on October 25, 2009, 10:31:59 PM
And I wouldn't be sure that everyone has seen it. I have recently shown it to six of my collegues and none of them have seen it before.
Post by: richierich on October 25, 2009, 11:14:01 PM
As I am sure everyone has seen it, I won't do a full review, but would just say I believe it is nearly faultless and a modern classic.
I own it but... :bag:
Kathy - please, please watch the film (http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3451/181c.gif)
Post by: richierich on October 25, 2009, 11:19:38 PM
As I mentioned in another thread, I am currently reading the original Stephen King novella.
And I wouldn't be sure that everyone has seen it. I have recently shown it to six of my collegues and none of them have seen it before.
Yes you are right, I made a poor assumption, for me it is a 'must have' in every dvd collection. It is a bit like Green Mile or Dances With Wolves, I wrongly believe every one must have seen them :bag:
So for everyone who doesn't own it;
£3.20 delivered here (http://www.play.com/DVD/DVD/4-/1983/The-Shawshank-Redemption/Product.html?ptsl=1&ob=Price&fb=0&&engine=froogle_film&keyword=The+Shawshank+Redemption+DVD&_$ja=tsid:11518%7Ccc:%7Cprd:1983%7Ccat:Movie+%3E+DVD+%3E+Classics)
or
$4.99 HERE (http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?id=27648&skuId=3290236&type=product&ci_src=11138&ci_sku=3290236&AID=10475872&PID=179100&URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bestbuy.com%2Fsite%2Folspage.jsp%3Fid%3D27648%26skuId%3D3290236%26type%3Dproduct%26ci_src%3D11138%26ci_sku%3D3290236&ref=39&loc=01)
Post by: Tom on October 25, 2009, 11:20:54 PM
Post by: Tom on October 25, 2009, 11:24:24 PM
Post by: richierich on October 25, 2009, 11:28:45 PM
Also if I would buy it now, I would definetely go with the Blu-ray release (e.g. £8.98 at Amazon.co.uk). Even though it is watchable, the video quality on the DVD release is far from perfect (at least on my 2004 R1 release).
Have you seen the quality of the bluray yet?, it is on my wishlist but I was wondering if they have achieved a major improvement in quality?
Post by: Tom on October 25, 2009, 11:55:33 PM
Have you seen the quality of the bluray yet?, it is on my wishlist but I was wondering if they have achieved a major improvement in quality?
No, I haven't. But I think it would definately be better than my DVD release. I almost would have ordered it myself, but I still stand strong with not double-dipping by upgrading my movies to Blu-ray.
Post by: Kathy on October 26, 2009, 12:00:45 AM
As I am sure everyone has seen it, I won't do a full review, but would just say I believe it is nearly faultless and a modern classic.
I own it but... :bag:
Kathy - please, please watch the film (http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3451/181c.gif)
I'll watch it tonight after football or, if I'm too tired, tomorrow since I'm free all day.
No need to beg...a little groveling will do! :laugh:
Post by: richierich on October 26, 2009, 01:03:19 AM
As I am sure everyone has seen it, I won't do a full review, but would just say I believe it is nearly faultless and a modern classic.
I own it but... :bag:
Kathy - please, please watch the film (http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/3451/181c.gif)
I'll watch it tonight after football or, if I'm too tired, tomorrow since I'm free all day.
No need to beg...a little groveling will do! :laugh:
Great stuff, and I'm not immune to a touch of grovelling when necessary ;D
Look forward to seeing your review
Post by: Najemikon on October 26, 2009, 01:42:55 AM
Looking forward to your comments.
Post by: Jimmy on October 26, 2009, 06:03:15 AM
Look forward to seeing your review
Looking forward to your comments.You will have to be patient...
BTW Kathy where are the reviews I'm waiting for since the beginning of september? :tease:
Post by: Kathy on October 26, 2009, 01:05:40 PM
Look forward to seeing your reviewLooking forward to your comments.You will have to be patient...
BTW Kathy where are the reviews I'm waiting for since the beginning of september? :tease:
Aggghhhhh...I keep forgetting! But what will I call it? Kathy's little know movie review? Or just :devil:
Post by: addicted2dvd on October 26, 2009, 01:09:46 PM
Post by: Tom on October 26, 2009, 02:47:29 PM
Hey... I never seen it either. But to be honest it really doesn't look like my type of movie.
It also seemed like this to me also going by the synopsis. But give it a chance, Pete. There is a reason that it is number 1 at IMDb's Top 250. It is universally likable.
Post by: addicted2dvd on October 26, 2009, 03:29:06 PM
Post by: Jimmy on October 26, 2009, 04:31:51 PM
Aggghhhhh...I keep forgetting! But what will I call it? Kathy's little know movie review? Or just :devil:If you want to use my own thread (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5335.0.html) I've no problem with this Kathy ;)
Post by: Achim on October 27, 2009, 05:28:21 AM
I will have to give it a try when I get the chance to either pick it up or catch it on cable.Can I add my :2cents: that this is indeed a good movie? I had resisted for a long time (just never got around to it, somehow) until Erik (from Invelos forum) pushed me to finally see it. I then postponed the purchase since the Blu-ray had been announced. While I wouldn't put it on the No. 1 spot myself I must say it's a great movie which never dragged despite its 3hr runtime. If anything I had a slight problem with the very last scene of the film, which I obviously can't descibe here.
Post by: Tom on October 27, 2009, 06:03:00 PM
If anything I had a slight problem with the very last scene of the film, which I obviously can't descibe here.In the book this last scene is not in it. And I agree, that this scene does not really fit with the rest of the movie. But I can live with it.
(click to show/hide)
Post by: Najemikon on October 27, 2009, 08:27:46 PM
If anything I had a slight problem with the very last scene of the film, which I obviously can't descibe here.In the book this last scene is not in it. And I agree, that this scene does not really fit with the rest of the movie. But I can live with it.(click to show/hide)
I disagree.
(click to show/hide)
Post by: richierich on October 27, 2009, 11:08:15 PM
If anything I had a slight problem with the very last scene of the film, which I obviously can't descibe here.In the book this last scene is not in it. And I agree, that this scene does not really fit with the rest of the movie. But I can live with it.(click to show/hide)
I disagree.(click to show/hide)
I disagree with your disagreement.
(click to show/hide)
Post by: Najemikon on October 28, 2009, 01:17:28 AM
If anything I had a slight problem with the very last scene of the film, which I obviously can't descibe here.In the book this last scene is not in it. And I agree, that this scene does not really fit with the rest of the movie. But I can live with it.(click to show/hide)
I disagree.(click to show/hide)
I disagree with your disagreement.(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Post by: Achim on October 28, 2009, 05:10:54 AM
(click to show/hide)
Post by: richierich on November 23, 2009, 12:31:52 AM
Title: The Dark Knight
Runtime:152
Certificate:12
Year:2008
Genres:Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Plot:The follow-up to Batman Begins, The Dark Knight reunites director Christopher Nolan and star Christian Bale, who reprises the role of Batman/Bruce Wayne in his continuing war on crime. With the help of Lt. Jim Gordon and District Attorney Harvey Dent, Batman sets out to destroy organized crime in Gotham for good. The triumvirate proves effective. But soon the three find themselves prey to a rising criminal mastermind known as The Joker, who thrusts Gotham into anarchy and forces Batman closer to crossing the fine line between hero and vigilante.
My Review:
Did the movie improve or worsen from my original review of the film HERE (http://www.dvdcollectorsonline.com/index.php/topic,5036.msg83466.html#msg83466) by watching it on BluRay?
It was noticably crisper and more vivid of course, the jokers nake-up was much more prominent, the characters facial expressions more graphoc, but the biggest improvement seemed to be the audio, which literally pumped me out of the seat at times with some incredibly heavy bass and pure HD sound. My previous review stands, it just made a superb film even better, and for a bluray at less than £7 I am really happy
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: snowcat on November 23, 2009, 12:02:05 PM
Post by: richierich on November 23, 2009, 12:20:56 PM
Did you feel the film could have ended about an hour and a half in? I thought Dark Knight was an hour too long :p
(http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/6230/wwwmessentoolscomcrazyo.gif)
Unlike the hitchcock film I reviewed recently, I thought this was the 'perfect length' (I managed to avoid an irresistable urge to use a carry-on pun here :devil: )
Post by: Achim on November 23, 2009, 04:19:57 PM
Title: The Dark KnightThis has been on my unwatched pile for too long... How did you like the effect where they open up the frame from 2.35:1 to 1.78:1, just like what they did in the IMAX theaters? I am so looking forward to that.
Post by: richierich on November 23, 2009, 06:05:06 PM
Title: The Dark KnightThis has been on my unwatched pile for too long... How did you like the effect where they open up the frame from 2.35:1 to 1.78:1, just like what they did in the IMAX theaters? I am so looking forward to that.
I have to be honest, I didn't notice :-[
Post by: Tom on November 23, 2009, 08:25:08 PM
Post by: Achim on November 24, 2009, 05:40:30 AM
I have to be honest, I didn't notice :-[
I only noticed it, because I knew beforehand.
I guess that's actually the point. If it is done well and fluidly integrated than the difference should not be noticable consciously. Like Tom, I know about this beforehand, so I wil see it...
Post by: richierich on November 26, 2009, 09:23:35 AM
Title: I, Robot
Runtime:110
Certificate:15
Year:2004
Genres:Science-Fiction, Suspense/Thriller, Action
Plot:In 2035 A.D., robots are programmed to live in harmony with humans and are part of every day life. When a brilliant scientist at the U.S. Robotics Corporation is found dead, Chicago Detective Del Spooner (Will Smith) is called in to investigate. Aided by robot psychologist Dr. Susan Calvin (Bridget Moynahan), Detective Spooner uncovers the possibility that a robot may be the primary suspect in the case. But as Spooner gets closer to the truth, he gets caught up in a race for his life. With time running out, a deeper threat emerges that challenges the very existence of mankind.
My Review:
Well-known film, picked at random in company.
There is plenty of corn in this movie, but if you can accept the tongue-in-cheek script the special effects, innovative ideas and fluid pace make this a very enjoyable viewing.
This may not be as intense as Blade Runner or explore the humanisation of robots as much as AI, but it delivers thrills and action the whole way through, with some very memorable moments such as the 1000 (1001) robots in the warehouse, the tunnel scene, and for me the facial expressions of Sonny which are amazing.
A blast with Smith in his element and Moynahan keeping good company, I expect everyone has like me seen this movie more than once - if you haven't you won't be disappointed.
My Rating
;D
;D
Post by: richierich on November 27, 2009, 12:16:19 AM
Title: Brüno
Runtime:78
Certificate:18
Year:2008
Genres:Comedy
Plot:VE ALL KNOW FAME IS THE PATH TO HAPPINESS, SO VHEN ZE AUSTRIAN PUBLIC GET ALL JEALOUS AND BOYCOTT ME, I REALIZE IT’S TIME FOR BRÜNO TO TAKE OVER ZE WORLD!
I GO TO ZE MIDDLE EAST TO HELP, I JOIN ZE AMERICAN ARMY, GO TO SWINGERS PARTIES,
DO THE TALK SHOWS, EVEN GO CAMPING WITH GRIZZLY BOYFRIENDS
– PLUS ZE ACCESSORY YOU SHOULDN’T BE SEEN WIVOUT – ZE LITTLE BLACK BABY.
VASSEVER – SO HOW FAMOUS YOU THINK BRÜNO BECOME? PUT IT ZIS WAY– NEXT YEAR
YOU ALL BE LIKE ADOLF WHO??!!??
My Review:
One of the worst films I have ever seen, sick and tasteless, Cohen believes he is something special now, but has clearly run out of ideas and even his cheap tacky humour has sunk to an all time low where he thinks staged shock scenes and shots of his cock will raise publicity and laughter.
This will offend all, without the edgy comedy that he brought with Ali G and Borat, it just leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Totally bereft of any intelligence or planning in the 'script', it stumbles from one appallingly staged scene to the next.
Redefines a bad film - do not waste your time or money.
My Rating
:yucky:
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on November 29, 2009, 10:19:25 PM
Title: Sleepless in Seattle
Runtime:101
Certificate:PG
Year:1993
Genres:Comedy, Romance
Plot:Christmas is a magical time when anything can happen. And for Annie Reed (Meg Ryan), a down-to-earth newspaper reporter, it's just about to.
Whilst driving to her fiancé's house on Christmas Eve, she hears a radio broadcast that will change her life.
Eight-year-old Jonah is worried about his recently widowed father, and calls a radio station agony aunt. Persuaded onto the phone, Jonah's dad Sam (Tom Hanks) tells of his love for his dead wife and how their time together was pure magic.
Annie is so touched by his heartfelt sentiment that she becomes determined to meet him. But there are a few problems: Sam's in Seattle, Annie's in Baltimore...and Sam doesn't even know that Annie exists!
My Review:
Note to self - hide remote controls when girlfriend visiting
Not much more I can say about such a well known film, except if I am being honest it is pretty watchable, and it is enjoyable for all viewers without engaging the brain too much.
My Rating
:D
:D
Post by: Rogmeister on November 29, 2009, 10:38:04 PM
Post by: richierich on December 23, 2009, 01:30:04 AM
Title: 27 Dresses
Runtime:111
Certificate:12
Year:2008
Genres:Romance, Comedy
Plot:Katherine Heigl (Knocked Up, Grey's Anatomy) finds the perfect fit in this sexy stylish film from the screenwriter of The Devil Wears Prada..
Sassy, smart, single Jane (Heigl) is the perfect friend - but looking after other people's perfect moments can sometimes land you in hot water, especially when you have friends to please, a sister's wedding to organise, a boss you secretly love and a handsome stranger thrown into the mix! What's a girl to do? Discover how Jane juggles life, love, laughter, a wardrobe of dresses and multiple weddings in this fabulous feel good film. With an all star cast including Ed Burns (The Holiday, She's The One) and James Marsden (Enchanted, XMen), 27 Dresses is this season's must-have accessory.
My Review:
Mildly entertaining fluff, gently amusing and reasonably acted.
Not enough rom and not enough com to make it stand out, and will fall into the 'soon to be forgotten' category. The characters are fairly dull, the script is cliche riddled, and it is ridiculously obvious from the beginning.
The film could have cut away at least half an hour and the viewer wouldn't have noticed, except for less boredom.
One to miss unless you catch it on TV on a rainy Sunday afternoon, dvd player not working, and your leg in a cast.
My Rating
:-\
:-\
Post by: richierich on December 23, 2009, 01:33:19 AM
Title: American Pie Presents: The Book of Love
Runtime:93
Certificate:18
Year:2009
Genres:Comedy
Plot:This all-new slice of American Pie is packed with more sexy antics, hot babes and uninhibited comedy than ever before!
Rob, Nathan and Lube are High School friends determined to score with the girls of their dreams. They accidentally discover a legendary guide for sexual success, written by former pupils, hidden in the school library. But a few missing pages lead to hilarious surprises for everyone!
My Review:
Even pissed this film is crap, unless you are a 15/16 year-old adolescent boy.
American Pie should have stopped after the 1st film.
But hey, it was bought for my 16 year old son, so I'll ask him after he watches it and maybe he can advise if it hit the target audience
My Rating
:yucky:
:yucky:
Post by: Jimmy on December 23, 2009, 03:46:24 AM
But hey, it was bought for my 16 year old son, so I'll ask him after he watches itYou will have to wait 2 years to know ;)
Post by: snowcat on December 23, 2009, 11:08:25 AM
Post by: Tom on December 23, 2009, 11:17:49 AM
(http://www.invelos.com/mpimages/50/5050582710809.4f.jpg)
Title: American Pie Presents: The Book of Love
How well fared Brandon Hardesty in it? He is the guy left on the cover with the green shirt. I follow his YouTube channel where he makes some fun movie scenes re-enactments.
Post by: richierich on December 24, 2009, 11:01:45 AM
(http://www.invelos.com/mpimages/50/5050582710809.4f.jpg)
Title: American Pie Presents: The Book of Love
How well fared Brandon Hardesty in it? He is the guy left on the cover with the green shirt. I follow his YouTube channel where he makes some fun movie scenes re-enactments.
He plays the fat kid with a crush on a cheerleader, fantasising about laying her for most of the film, but of course has no chance. Does end up bedding a hottie thanks to 'the book of love'.
He is ok, and that is about 100 times better than most of the awful performers in this movie :laugh:
Post by: richierich on December 28, 2009, 12:31:42 PM
  |
Title: Total Recall
Runtime:114
Certificate:18
Year:1990
Genres:Action, Science-Fiction, Suspense/Thriller
Plot:Arnold Schwarzenegger stars as Douglas Quaid, a tough construction worker with a beautiful wife, a good job and great friends. Haunted by recurring dreams of another life on Mars, Quaid is drawn to Rekall Incorporated, a travel service specializing in implanting fantasies in the minds of those who wish to turn their dreams into reality - dreams as real as a memory in your mind.
But something goes wrong and the procedure unlocks memories that were supposed to be left hidden - suddenly his every move is dogged by would-be assassins and he discovers a mirror image recording of himself which says 'Get ready for a big surprise. You're not you. You're me.'
As his reality shatters around him, Quaid journeys to Mars to solve the mystery of who he is. It's a journey of non-stop action and extraordinary special effects on which Quaid must contend with strange mutants, futuristic vehicles and a staggering array of weaponry.
My Review:
First viewing of this old favourite on bluray.
There has clearly been efforts to upgrade the quality from dvd, but it was a bit grainy if you stood close to the tv, and it wasn't 'stagerringly better' in this format.
For the film, I love this OTT sci-fi with plenty of black humour, special effects which have stood the test of time, and action in spades. Arnie shines in this synthetic role, and Sharon Stone was a real eye opener.
It is packed with detail, and director Verhoven works a functional script into a great popcorn movie hit.
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on December 28, 2009, 12:51:57 PM
 |
Title: The Patriot
Runtime:175
Certificate:15
Year:2000
Genres:War, Drama
Plot:In a picture that "has everything you want in an epic" ('Time'), Mel Gibson delivers "a powerful and effective performance" (Roger Ebert) as former war hero Benjamin Martin, who has renounced fighting forever-until the Revolutionary War arrives at his front door.
Faced with the harsh reality of fighting to protect those he loves, Martin takes up arms and commands a brave rebel militia in fierce battles against the well-armed English army, fighting for his family and his young nation's freedom.
My Review:
The Patriot looked remarkable on bluray, the colours are bright and vibrantly add realism to each shot, the contrast is superb, faces and costumes literally jump out of the screen, shadows and dark areas come alive. This attention to detail and work done on this catalogue transfer is as good as I have seen, and makes this release worthwhile purchasing just to highlight to others the benefits of HD viewing.
To really add a cherry on top, the audio is amazing, full use of surroundism is utilised, with bullets whizzing round the room, natures sounds popping out of all speakers, and the cannon fire delivered with whopping bassy realism.
For the film, of course it is a very watchable classic, a bit heavy in terms of its length, but totally absorbing, crisp and professionally directed, with history tweaked a bit for the viewing pleasure. The acting is generally magnificent, with Jason Isaacs being the stand out star for me.
Get this on blu-ray!
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: Najemikon on December 28, 2009, 01:51:48 PM
For the film, of course it is a very watchable classic...
:hmmmm:
Now look, I enjoy this film too and I'm glad to see someone giving it a boost, but... well, that's my point. It needs support! It's usually universally derided! :laugh:
Oh yeah, and thanks. That's another Blu upgrade to consider... :redcard:
Post by: richierich on December 28, 2009, 02:17:09 PM
For the film, of course it is a very watchable classic...
:hmmmm:
Now look, I enjoy this film too and I'm glad to see someone giving it a boost, but... well, that's my point. It needs support! It's usually universally derided! :laugh:
Oh yeah, and thanks. That's another Blu upgrade to consider... :redcard:
Ok - 'classic' may have been an overstatement :-[ but lets be honest everyone says Braveheart is a classic, and this film has so many parallels with that movie they are practically identical under the surface
But I was still overwhelmed by the AVC transfer when I wrote the review, hats off to Sony for another great job
Post by: Najemikon on December 28, 2009, 02:58:15 PM
Post by: richierich on December 30, 2009, 02:06:39 AM
 |
Title: Gangs Of New York
Runtime:166
Certificate:18
Year:2002
Genres:Drama, Action, War
Plot:Martin Scorsese's GANGS OF NEW YORK introduces today's world to the Five Points, a dark corner of the city known to New Yorkers of long ago as the centre of vice and chaos.
Into this frontier of extreme lawlessness arrives the young Amsterdam Vallon (Leonardo DiCaprio). Amsterdam is the orphaned son of the slain Priest Vallon (Liam Neeson) - once chief warrior of the Dead Rabbits gang that rallied the Irish immigrants of the Five Points.
Amsterdam has returned to the Five Points to hunt down his father's killer. His target is William Cutting AKA "Bill the Butcher" (Daniel Day-Lewis), who has since become the merciless new leader of the neighbourhood, a Nativist who detests the newly arrived immigrants and is determined to fend off all so-called "foreign invaders".
My Review:
You would of hoped that a big movie like this which was condemned as being poor quality on dvd, would have been remastered for blu-ray. Sadly not, there is still problems with hues, ghosting and shadow on the edges of the picture, and it is very noticeable specifically in the big fight scenes. The audio is first-rate and really loud, had to turn amp way down more than usual.
For the film itself, it has many flaws of course most noticibly DiCrapio playing a hard Irish immigrant ( :hysterical: ) but it is a fun action and bloodthirsty tale, with Daniel Day Lewis playing a wonderful role, and it is one of my guilty pleasures.
My Rating
;D
;D
Post by: richierich on December 30, 2009, 02:17:02 AM
Title: District 9
Runtime:108
Certificate:15
Year:2009
Genres:Science-Fiction, Action
Plot:From producer Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings Trilogy) and director Neill Blomkamp comes a startlingly original science fiction thriller. With stunning special effects and gritty realism, the film plunges us into a world where the aliens have landed... only to be exiled to a slum on the fringes of Johannesburg. Now, one lone human discovers the mysterious secret of the extraterrestrial weapon technology. Hunted and hounded through the bizarre back alleys of an alien shantytown, he will discover what it means to be the ultimate outsider on your own planet.
My Review:
Disappointed after watching this movie, had hoped it would be either much better action, stronger sci-fi storyline, or blackly humourous. It kinda fails on all counts.
It is jam-packed full of amazing special effects, but it is so light on drama, atmosphere or storyline that it just doesn't ever hit a sweetspot. It is wholly original in many aspects, although you can definately pick out elements that Jackson has picked up from other films, it is pacy, the lead of Jason Cope is excellent, and it doesn't stink of Hollywood.
I think it will be more attractive to others, and I hope to read some reviews on here. For me I liked it, but I was a long way away from loving it.
My Rating
:D
:D
Post by: Achim on December 30, 2009, 03:37:03 AM
I can see how the trailer may have been misleading and could have built false expectations.
Post by: Rogmeister on January 02, 2010, 02:04:12 PM
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2010, 06:30:08 PM
Title: All About Steve
Runtime:99
Certificate:
Year:2009
Genres:Comedy, Romance
Plot:Sandra Bullock (The Proposal) and Bradley Cooper (The Hangover) star in this off-the-wall comedy about a blind date gone hilariously wrong. When eccentric, but lovable, Mary gets set up with Steve, a news channel cameraman, she falls hard. He does not. Mary decides to follow Steve on a cross-country hunt for breaking news and soon finds herself entangled in the story. But despite the media storm surrounding her, Mary may just discover her true place in the world...and the man of her dreams!
My Review:
Limp rom-com, perhaps Bullocks worst film and role in many years, it is a ridiculous storyline and all the actors appear embarrassed to be seen in this Hollywood cash-in.
The whole movie is pointless, SB playing a stalking crossword nerd is a total waste, and Bradley Cooper does his best with limited quality script. There are very few funny moments, and miniscule romantic involvement to accomodate the genre.
Skip this and spend an hour and a half watching something better!
My Rating
:yawn:
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on January 06, 2010, 06:41:52 PM
Title: Paranormal Activity
Runtime:86
Certificate:R
Year:2009
Genres:Horror
Plot:YOU DEMANDED IT and now the surprise hit critics call "one of the scariest movies of all time"* can be experienced in the most terrifying place of all...your home.
After a young, middle-class couple moves into what seems like a typical suburban house, they become increasingly disturbed by a presence that may or may not be demonic but is certainly most active in the middle of the night. Especially while they sleep.
Paranormal Activity builds suspense night after night all the way to the shocking ending. Roger Ebert calls it "truly scary."** Go ahead, WE DARE YOU TO WATCH IT AT HOME...at least you can leave the lights on.
My Review:
Yes, it is scary! Done in the style of a real-life amateur documentary, the slow build-up and understated initial activities create tension, fear and trepidation until the final climax.
Some parts are chilling, and will remain memorable. Where the girl stands rocking by the bed for hours - still makes the hair on back of my neck stand-up, perhaps its that primal fear of what happens when we sleep? You need your imagination to fully enjoy and get unsettled by this, if you liked Blair Witch then this will really cook your goose.
How much of this is based on the true story and video recovered by the police? I like to stay a bit naive and believe a lot so this film remains with me as very impactive and haunting.
My Rating
;D
;D
Post by: richierich on January 09, 2010, 11:27:16 PM
Title: The Wild
Runtime:78
Certificate:U
Year:2006
Genres:Animation, Adventure
Plot:Get ready for an amazing family adventure you'll never forget. Disney uncages the laughs in the hip and hilarious comedy The Wild.
When a funny band of furry friends escape from the city zoo, they discover that New York city is the biggest, craziest jungle of all. Bursting with bonus features, including a hysterical bloopers and blunders reel, deleted scenes and more, The Wild is ferocious fun for audiences of all ages.
My Review:
Mildly amusing animated feature, very clever in its use of cutesy animal characters, but done before and since by the likes of ice age, madagascar and lion king, and bettered several times.
It lacks the pacy script, the 'adult' and kids jokes, but does score highly on the grahics side.
More suited for the younger child I think.
My Rating
:D
:D
Post by: richierich on January 09, 2010, 11:28:13 PM
Title: Carriers
Runtime:84
Certificate:PG-13
Year:2009
Genres:Drama, Horror, Suspense/Thriller
Plot:Chris Pine (Star Trek) stars in this intense, gripping thriller about a deadly threat beyond anyone's worst nightmare. Determined to escape a lethal virus, four teens set out in search of an uncontaminated refuge, only to discover that they are far more dangerous to each other than the virus they are trying to survive. Carriers is a pulse-pounding journey into a world where laws and rules no longer apply, and no one can be trusted - not even your friends.
My Review:
Lost opportunity for what started as an interesting apocalyptic movie, but fell away in to a low budgetted and weakly acted twenty-something human interest story.
It all becomes a bit over familiar, and the pointlessly intensive concentration of characterisation over the horror aspect of such a scenario that the group find themselves in is plainly ridiculous and becomes tedious.
Unimaginative, and near the bottom of the pile with regards to virus/end of world genre of movie.
My Rating
:-\
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 17, 2010, 12:00:39 AM
Title: Gridlock'd
Runtime:91
Certificate:R
Year:1997
Genres:Drama, Comedy
Plot:When their friend Cookie o.d.'s, best buddies and musicians Spoon (Tupac Shakur) and Stretch (Tim Roth) decide it's time to kick their drug habit by putting themselves into detox. But they soon discover that the road to rehab is paved with reams of social service red tape. Spoon and Stretch are just trying to stay alive until they can get treatment. But, between the angry drug dealers, the cops who have mistaken them for murderers, and the people with forms and clipboards, this turns into a task of epic proportions. Thus enfolds their comic adventure to sobriety.
My Review:
At times fairly amusing, but with a cast I was unlikely ever to warm to, this drug/rehab tale is pretty run of the mill and wholly unremarkable. To be fair both leads seemed to gel quite well together, but the subject matter and supposed reasoning for rehabbing was unremarkable.
Paints an horrendous picture of US healthcare, which apparently is quite accurate in that if you do not have health insurance you are basically screwed.
Mildly entertaining, if you happen to be a Roth or Tupac fan you'd proably give this a higher mark.
My Rating
:-\
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 17, 2010, 12:19:29 AM
Title: Demon Seed
Runtime:94
Certificate:R
Year:1977
Genres:Horror, Science-Fiction
Plot:Susan Harris is alone in the house when, suddenly, doors lock, windows slam shut and the phone stops working. Susan is trapped by an intruder...but this is no ordinary thug. Instead, the intruder is a computer named Proteus, an artificial brain that has learned to reason. And to terrorize.
In "one of her finest, most vulnerable perfromances" (Danny Peary, Guide for the Film Fanatic), Julie Christie plays Susan in this taut techno-thriller based on the Dean Koontz novel. Packed with suspense, surprise and special effects, Demon Seed follows Susan's desperate attempts to outmaneuver and outthink her captor. Then Susan learns what Proteus wants: its own child, conceived in her womb and destined for domination.
My Review:
Quirky, strange, weird, scary and immensely watchable.
From a Dean Koontz novel I had read some years ago, Julie Christie is outstanding and brings her character from the page to the screen with admirable panache. The direction is slick, and Vaughns creepy voice of the machine was an inspired choice. It is amazing to think this was made and created in the 70's, when today we are so close to such a scenario of computers with intelligence and artificial consciousness.
Engaging, typically attractive 70's sci-fi effects and feel similar to Logans Run etc, this was an unexpected entertaining pleasure to view.
My Rating
;D
;D
Post by: addicted2dvd on January 17, 2010, 12:27:25 AM
Post by: richierich on January 17, 2010, 12:28:41 AM
Title: Robin Hood: Men in Tights
Runtime:100
Certificate:PG
Year:1993
Genres:Comedy
Plot:The legend that had it coming, ROBIN HOOD: MEN IN TIGHTS wipes away the mystery - and the dignity! - of England's most infamous stocking-filler as Robin of Loxley and his merry men bring a dose of sheer mayhem to Sherwood Forest! Throwing away their titles and their trousers, Robin and his nylon-clad crew battle to bring down the evil Prince John and his hideous side-kick the Sheriff of Rottingham to procure the key to Maid Marian's heart...and her chastity belt! ROBIN HOOD: MEN IN TIGHTS...There's no flies on them!
My Review:
I have always thought 90% of Mel Brooks ventures were awful, but this sinks to a new low and is total crap.
A couple of reasonable performances from the likes of Cary Elwes and Eric Cramer try to drag this film up to mediocre, but sadly it only worsens with cheap and tacky gags, some downright awful acting, and sets looking distinctly amateurish and low budget.
Not sure if it's just that I dislike the director so much my view is tainted, but I cannot believe anyone would get more than a couple of titters from this weak spoof comedy.
My Rating
:yawn:
:yawn:
Post by: richierich on January 17, 2010, 12:28:57 AM
Title: The Marine 2
Runtime:95
Certificate:R
Year:2009
Genres:War, Action
Plot:WWE Superstar Ted DiBiase joins "the few and the proud" in this explosive tale of white-knuckle action, stunning effects and true heroism fit for the Marines. This fully loaded DVD brings the action home with six featurettes, Muay Thai fight outtakes and much more!
On a well-deserved vacation to an exotic resort, Marine sergeant Joe Linwood (DiBiase) and his wife Robin are attending a VIP party when disaster strikes. Ruthless terrorists crash the event and claim a number of hostages -- including Robin! Alone in a foreign country with no backup, Linwood must rely on his Marine training to single-handedly strike back at the terrorists, save the hostages and prevent international war!
My Review:
Very much like the first film, this flick promises more than it delivers and ends up being a ridiculous Hollywood action film.
With the wooden Ted DiBiase in the lead role, one should be warned what drivelling depths this film will sink to. However it drops below awful in a storyline apparently written by a 7 year old boy, a cast that besides eye candy Lara Cox is laughable, and a ridiculous sense of self-worth that is totally undeserving.
A movie to prove that high-budget action does not equal entertainment.
My Rating
:yucky:
:yucky:
Post by: Rogmeister on January 17, 2010, 12:58:34 AM
Why should the people listen to you?
Because...unlike some Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent. :laugh:
Post by: richierich on January 17, 2010, 01:31:17 AM
You're probably right about Mel Brooks' Robin Hood movie. I never saw that one myself but everyone I ever heard from about this movie said it stinks. I did like one exchange I've seen in promos for it, though.
Why should the people listen to you?
Because...unlike some Robin Hoods, I can speak with an English accent. :laugh:
Yes Roger, undoubtably the best line in the film :laugh:
Post by: Achim on January 18, 2010, 05:59:38 AM
Title: CarriersI felt the same way when I saw it at the cinema. I thought the major flaw was that all characters were basically stupid morons and the films lacked a likeable character for the audience to identify with. Also, it could have been a bot more 28 Days Later, but instead they just kept talking until my interest was near 0.
[...]My Rating
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 11:44:37 AM
Title: Shampoo
Runtime:110
Certificate:R
Year:1975
Genres:Romance, Comedy
Plot:SHAMPOO is a racy, star-studded bedroom farce set in the decadent, sexually liberated Los Angeles of the late 1960s. Written by Academy Award® winner Warren Beatty (1982 Best Director, Reds) and Robert Towne (Chinatown) and directed by Hal Ashby (Being There), the film was nominated for four Academy Awards® and has been chosen as one of the American Film Institute's 100 Funniest Movies.
George (Beatty) is one of L.A.'s most desirable men, a Beverly Hills hairdresser who makes all his female clients look, and feel, better than ever. Encouraged by his girlfriend Jill (Goldie Hawn) to open his own salon, George approaches conservative businessman Lester (Jack Warden) for financing. Unbeknownst to Lester, George is sleeping with his wife (Lee Grant), his mistress (Julie Christie) and his teenage daughter (Carrie Fisher). Can George resist temptation and settle down with Jill or will he get tangled up in even more scandalous affairs?
My Review:
Revisit to a film I haven't seen since vhs days.
Goldie Hawn is a guilty pleasure of mine, I know she isn't a great actress but I just love her character and find her infectious.
This movie is a sex farce that doesn't fit brilliantly together, but is striking at times and contains some great acting, notably Warren Beatty in his good period, and even more so Lee Grant as Beattys lover. It has aged over the years, but is still an interesting insight into personal relationships and an alternative view of the hippy culture.
Hawn and a young Julie Christie both look tremendous, and raise the marks accordingly.
My Rating
:D
:D
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 11:54:57 AM
Title: There's No Business Like Show Business
Runtime:117
Certificate:NR
Year:1954
Genres:Comedy, Musical
Plot:Marilyn Monroe and an all-star cast are featured in Irving Berlin's tuneful depiction of the trials and triumphs of a veteran vaudeville family. The talented Donahue family has plenty of love to get them through the hard times – that is, until they cross paths with a rising starlet (Monroe) whose own ambitions may make or break them. Co-starring Ethel Merman and Donald O'Connor, this delightful classic delivers dazzling production numbers and masterful show tunes!
My Review:
Certainly not my favourite Marilyn Monroe film, this musical lacked a worthwhile plot, strong characters or much purpose.
But there is still some charm in its portrayal of a vaudeville family, and the songs of Berlin help drag this above the mundane, and you do find yourself smiling after watching it. Ethel Merman stood out amongst the cast, and the production is colourful and eye pleasing.
The worst element of the film for me is the prémis that Marilyn would of hung out with Donald O'Connor, unlikely or what and totally mismatched.
Still an enjoyable 50's Fox extravaganza, worth a one-off viewing.
My Rating
:D
:D
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 01:43:47 PM
Title: Dances with Wolves (BLURAY)
Runtime:181
Certificate:15
Year:1990
Genres:Western, Drama
Plot:Assigned to a remote outpost in the 1860’s West, Lt. John Dunbar fears the nearby Sioux Indians and expects to fight them. Instead, he befriends them and becomes the man in the middle of a brushfire of tension: the conflict between U.S. expansion and Native Americans.
Kevin Costner plays Dunbar and makes one of Hollywood’s most impressive directorial debuts with this winner of seven Academy Awards** including Best Picture and Best Director. Battles rage, fates collide, bison thunder across the prairie - the adventure is epic, heroic and stunning.
My Review:
An old favourite watched for the first time on bluray.
Firstly the film. It is a superb, deep, moving and memorable epic, directed and starring Costner, in a role that suited his acting persona perfectly. It is passionately produced, with dreamy landscapes and backdrops depicting the old frontier, cinematography at its best. It's portrayal of the Union officer living life on a lonely outpost and his befriending of the native Sioux, culminating in his marriage to Stands with a Fist, is mesmeric and with the moving ongoing narration from his journal draws you into the movie. The use of native languages, Dunbars passionate character, the great performances from so many actors, makes you forget this film is 3 hours long and creates great empathy from the viewer. Whether this picture atones in any way for the treatment by the white man of the Native American Sioux is unlikely, but it does give a truer vision of a caring, compassionate and spiritual people that Hollywood portrayed unjustly for so many years.
As for the bluray itself, I was disappointed as this is the 3 hour cut, not the extended or directors editions. The visuals are superb, but of course they were also on dvd, its just that bit better now. The colours are lush and sharper, fully exploiting those spectacular sweeping vistas of wide open plains. There seems to be more on the screen also, with little or no cropping, adding that feeling of vastness. The sound is rich and wholesome, and bar a few grainy scenes this is a good advert for a 1080 transfer.
My Rating
:thumbup:
:thumbup:
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 01:53:27 PM
Title: Nothing in Common
Runtime:119
Certificate:PG
Year:1986
Genres:Comedy, Drama
Plot:Tom Hanks, Jackie Gleason and Eva Marie Saint are unforgettable in the story of a young, ambitious executive whose life is surprisingly affected by the break-up of his parents' marriage. Co-starring Sela Ward, Bess Armstrong and Hector Elizondo.
Because of his talent, charm and wisecracking sense of humor, David Basner (Hanks) is a self-made man on the fast track. He loves his job, his bank account is healthy, and women find him irresistible. Then his father Max (Gleason, in his final film performance) calls to give David the news that he and David's mother Lorraine (Saint) are calling it quits after 35 years. Now, besides the pressures of his own busy life, David has the new responsibilities of taking care of his crotchety dad and emotionally supporting his mother. Through these experiences, David gains a new understanding and appreciation of his parents, with whom he thought he had nothing in common.
NOTHING IN COMMON is a funny, heart-warming film that struck a chord with audiences (who made it a hit) and showcases the charismatic performance of a young Tom Hanks on his way to Oscar®-winning superstardom.
My Review:
Below average comedy that feels like a cheaply made tv sitcom despite the big name stars. Hanks is below par, but it is an over indulgent self-apprecaiting performance by Gleason that really turned me off to the movie.
The plot is undercooked, the scenes disjointed, and the film feels incredibly dated from its mid-eighties debut. Eva Marie Saint does her best with a weak script, but overall I felt director Garry Marshall missed the mark on this, but I did like his following huge hits like Pretty Women, Beaches and Overboard.
My Rating
:-\
:-\
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 02:08:29 PM
Title: George of the Jungle 2
Runtime:83
Certificate:PG
Year:2003
Genres:Family, Comedy
Plot:"Watch out for the tree-slammin', elephant-callin' action -- all the fun of the original and more!" (Mark S. Allen, UPN-TV). The wild adventure and comedy that families and critics went bananas for continue with everyone's favorite characters in GEORGE OF THE JUNGLE 2. When we last saw George, he and his bride Ursula were living in wedded bliss in the peaceful jungle. Unfortunately, all this is about to change. Scheming mother-in-law Beatrice Stanhope is not about to let her daughter and grandson hang around with the klutzy King of the Jungle forever. In an elaborate plot, she teams with Ursula's obsessive ex-fiance Lyle to hypnotize Ursula into leaving George and turn his jungle to mulch! That's when all vines lead to Las Vegas. There, George, Ape, Shep, and Tookie-Tookie must rescue Ursula, and then swing back to save the jungle from Lyle's bulldozing bullies. You'll go ape when these jungle jesters come together for irresistible all-new family entertainment.
My Review:
Some sequels should never be made, this is one of them.
I didn't even like the first film very much, but it was twice as good as this blatant commercial attempt to cash-in. Without Brendan Frazer in the lead role, there is little of merit to establish a positive from this attempted comedy. The script is funny, but only because there isn't one, as the 'story' wavers all over the place in a dumb plotline that is stupid. I actually felt myself getting irritated by its desperate attempts to mimic the first movie, and its cringeworthy amatuerism. Hollywood owes me another 80 minutes which I would have preferred spent watching paint dry.
The outtakes in the credits were funny, thats the only plus in a rubbish movie to avoid.
My Rating
:yucky:
:yucky:
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 02:19:10 PM
Title: Bloodsport
Runtime:92
Certificate:R
Year:1988
Genres:Action, Martial Arts
Plot:Bloodsport takes you where few have ever gone – inside the hidden Hong Kong arena where elite combatants clash in the Kumite, the little-known but hotly contested world championship of full-contact fighting. No Westerner had ever won this titanic tournament until iron-willed American Frank Dux. Bloodsport is his story, a true-life triumph of bedrock courage, uncanny skill and steadfast loyalty.
As Dux, Jean-Claude Van Damme also enjoyed a true-life triumph. This role kickboxed his career as a box-office favorite into overdrive. Van Damme has dazzled audiences ever since, playing heroes who simply refused to lose. And when Van Damme steps onto the mat, Bloodsport isn't just a sport. It's a war!
My Review:
Loosely based on a true story, i must admit to enjoying watching this early van damme martial arts film that I watched years ago on video. He was an even worse actor then than he is now (and thats saying something) but he sure could fight, and his trademark splits were portrayed several times.
Definately a lads film with more and more violent bouts, a baddie in the guise of Bolo Yeung, a multitude of different fighting styles on show, and an early Forest Whittaker performance.
The loose sub plots do not detract from the main aim of the film, namely a high kicking ball busting scrapfest, which was delivered with aplomb.
One to watch with a few mates and a crate of beer.
My Rating
:D
:D
Post by: richierich on January 24, 2010, 02:20:34 PM
Title: Gamer
Runtime:95
Certificate:
Year:2009
Genres:Science-Fiction, Suspense/Thriller, Action
Plot:Set in a future-world where humans can control other humans in mass-scale, multi-player online gaming environments, a star player (Butler) from a game called "Slayers" looks to regain his independence while taking down the game's mastermind (Hall).
My Review:
My Rating
Post by: Najemikon on February 24, 2010, 10:16:51 PM
(http://www.invelos.com/mpimages/50/5051892007184.4f.jpg)
Title: Dances with Wolves (BLURAY)
An old favourite watched for the first time on bluray.
Firstly the film. It is a superb, deep, moving and memorable epic, directed and starring Costner, in a role that suited his acting persona perfectly. It is passionately produced, with dreamy landscapes and backdrops depicting the old frontier, cinematography at its best. It's portrayal of the Union officer living life on a lonely outpost and his befriending of the native Sioux, culminating in his marriage to Stands with a Fist, is mesmeric and with the moving ongoing narration from his journal draws you into the movie. The use of native languages, Dunbars passionate character, the great performances from so many actors, makes you forget this film is 3 hours long and creates great empathy from the viewer. Whether this picture atones in any way for the treatment by the white man of the Native American Sioux is unlikely, but it does give a truer vision of a caring, compassionate and spiritual people that Hollywood portrayed unjustly for so many years.
As for the bluray itself, I was disappointed as this is the 3 hour cut, not the extended or directors editions. The visuals are superb, but of course they were also on dvd, its just that bit better now. The colours are lush and sharper, fully exploiting those spectacular sweeping vistas of wide open plains. There seems to be more on the screen also, with little or no cropping, adding that feeling of vastness. The sound is rich and wholesome, and bar a few grainy scenes this is a good advert for a 1080 transfer.
Not sure how I missed this review. Just caught it off the homepage thankfully. It is my absolute favourite film and it was great to read those comments! You have taste, sir. :thumbup: Not bothered about Blu yet. Maybe they'll do the extended, then I'll be dipping...
Post by: MEJHarrison on March 04, 2010, 08:17:00 PM